Skip to main content
Download PDF

Physiological and transcriptomic analysis reveals the potential mechanism of Morinda officinalis How in response to freezing stress

BMC Plant Biology volume 23, Article number: 507 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Morinda officinalis How (MO) is a vine shrub distributed in tropical and subtropical regions, known as one of the “Four Southern Herbal Medicines” in China. The unclear responsive mechanism by which MO adapt to freezing stress limits progress in molecular breeding for MO freezing tolerance.

Results

In this study, morphological, physiological and microstructure changes in MO exposed to -2℃ for 0 h, 3 h, 8 h and 24 h were comprehensively characterized. The results showed that freezing stress caused seedling dehydration, palisade cell and spongy mesophyll destruction. A significant increase in the content of proline, soluble protein and soluble sugars, as well as the activity of superoxide dismutase and peroxidase was observed. Subsequently, we analyzed the transcriptomic changes of MO leaves at different times under freezing treatment by RNA-seq. A total of 24,498 unigenes were annotated and 3252 unigenes were identified as differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Most of these DEGs were annotated in starch and sucrose metabolism, plant hormone signal transduction and MAPK signaling pathways. Family Enrichment analysis showed that the glucosyl/glucuronosyl transferases, oxidoreductase, chlorophyll a/b binding protein and calcium binding protein families were significantly enriched. We also characterized 7 types of transcription factors responding to freezing stress, among which the most abundant family was the MYBs, followed by the AP2/ERFs and NACs. Furthermore, 10 DEGs were selected for qRT-PCR analysis, which validated the reliability and accuracy of RNA-seq data.

Conclusions

Our results provide an overall view of the dynamic changes in physiology and insight into the molecular regulation mechanisms of MO in response to freezing stress. This study will lay a foundation for freezing tolerance molecular breeding and improving the quality of MO.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Morinda officinalis How (MO) is a perennial vine shrub and belongs to Rubiaceae family. The roots of MO have been often used as a tonic or traditional Chinese medicine attributed to its unique effects of tonifying kidney-yang, strengthening muscles and bones, and eliminating wind dampness [1]. Researches showed that MO contained many bioactive components, such as oligosaccharides, polysaccharides, iridoids and anthraquinones [2,3,4,5]. Among them, nystose of the oligosaccharide component had attracted extensive attention owing to its high content, anti-depression and anti-osteoporosis effects [6,7,8].

MO prefers a warm and humid climate, mainly distributed in tropical and subtropical regions of China such as Guangdong, Guangxi, Hainan and Fujian provinces. Deqing county in Guangdong is one of the genuine producing areas of MO, where is surrounded by hills, with abundant rainfall, sunshine and mild climate. In recent years, the demand for MO has increased dramatically and the wild resources have been on the verge of extinction. Most of MO had been propagated by cuttings presently. We have previously conducted a large number of investigations on MO germplasm resources, and found that there is rich genetic diversity in MO population [9]. According to the difference of leaf shape and leaf size, it is mainly divided into large-leaf type, middle-leaf type and small-leaf type. We have learned in practice through prolonged observation that the small-leaf type has the characteristics of high yield, strong disease-resistance and easy-planting, while the large-leaf type has the characteristics of cold-resistance and drought-resistance, both of which are widely planted in actual production.

As a result of long-term asexual reproduction, MO may be susceptible to diseases and virus, leading to the degradation of MO germplasm and quality [10,11,12]. In order to improve the situation of succession cropping obstacle, it is of great significance to try to migrate the MO cultivation area, which just like Panax notoginseng [13] and Rehmanniag lutinosa [14]. Interestingly, we found that when MO was transplanted to Wengyuan county, it still maintained its original growth characteristics, had great adaptability and a higher yield, indicating that the northward introduction was initially successful. The roots of MO produced by Wengyuan had numerous branches, short and thick, with a light purple cross-section [15]. Moreover, the nystose content in MO samples of different growth years generally increased. This may be benefited from the special geological conditions and climate of Wengyuan county, which is located in the north of Guangdong province, with fertile soil, a relatively lower annual average temperature and the minimum of -2℃ in winter. The plants usually adapt to freezing environment by accumulating sugars or changing their cell components [16,17,18,19]. However, due to the special growth characteristics of MO, unusual abrupt temperature changes in winter and later spring frost events could seriously attenuate MO growth, development and yield. Therefore, it is an urgent need to clarify MO freezing response mechanisms.

Freezing stress changes not only the phenotype of plants, such as slow growth, leaves dehydrated and atrophied, but also various intracellular metabolisms, such as slower membrane fluidity, increased membrane permeability and the occurrence of lipid peroxidation reaction [20, 21]. In the long-term evolutionary process, plants have formed a series of defensive mechanisms to adapt and resist to low temperature [22]. When plants are exposed to a nonlethal low temperature, cold signals are perceived by hypothetical sensors, including cell membranes, calcium (Ca2+) channels and G-protein regulator (COLD1) [23,24,25]. The concentration of intracellular Ca2+ increases briefly, which stimulates the signaling process. The promoter of the cold regulation (COR) gene contains a CRT/DRE cis element that can bind to DREBs. DREBs include DREB1/CBF and DREB2, which would be induced by low temperature and dehydration, respectively [26]. Also, the CBFs could be activated by other transcription factors of upstream elements, such as the ICE protein [27]. In addition, plant hormone plays a fundamental role in regulating plant responses to low temperature. For example, the increase content of abscisic acid (ABA) would close the stomata, reduce water loss, activate downstream signals and finally enhance the tolerance to dehydration and low temperature. Ca2+ signals at the forefront of signaling process can also be transmitted by ABA signals. ABA may regulate the expression of COR gene through pathways that affect CBFs or unrelated to CBFs [28]. Through the integration and regulation of low-temperature signal transduction networks, plants ultimately improve their cold-resistance ability by changing their physiology and internal structural characteristics.

Higher lipid content and unsaturation are positive factors to improve cold tolerance by maintaining the integrity and fluidity of plasma membrane [29]. The thickness of leaves, palisade tissue and sponge tissue usually vary with the natural environment and physiological conditions of plants, and the changes in internal structural of leaves are often used as one of the important criteria for freezing tolerance. Proteins involved in the stability and repair of photosynthesis play an important role in maintaining the normal structure and function of chloroplasts [30,31,32]. Furthermore, low temperature can induce the accumulation of cell osmore-gulation substances, such as proline, soluble sugar and soluble protein, to prevent the decrease of intracellular water potential. In addition, antioxidant systems such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) play a central role in removing excess ROS [33].

Presently, little is known about MO freezing response mechanism. In this study, we comprehensively characterized the morphological, physiological and microstructural changes to freezing treatment in MO. The large-leaf type of MO was selected for analysis since it showed a higher freezing tolerance than the small-leaf type in our previous preliminary study. We also utilized RNA-seq to evaluate changes in the expression of DEGs at different time points, and identified several genes that may strongly impact the freezing resistance process. It is the first report exploring the MO freezing response molecular mechanism. Our results can provide valuable resources for practitioners performing MO freezing tolerance breeding, laying the foundation for expanding MO cultivation area and improving the quality and yield of MO.

Materials and methods

Plant material

The four-year-old MO plants were collected from Deqing county, Guangdong province of China. The samples were identified by Prof. Ping Ding (Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong, China). In this study, all seedlings were produced by the tissue culture methods, which is a stable genetic system established in the previous study [34]. The original vines of MO were cut from the stem base, and new vines grew after one month in a clean greenhouse. Young stem segments of MO were used as explants and inoculated into Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium (3% sucrose, pH6.0, 0.4% agar, 1.0 mg/L 6-benzyladenine and 0.5 mg/L indole butyric acid) after disinfection. When the tissue culture seedlings grew for 60 days, they were transferred to pots filled with a 1:1 mixture of perlite and peat soil. The culture temperature was set at 22 °C, photoperiod 12 h/12 h (light/dark), light intensity of 1200 lx, and humidity of 75%.

Freezing treatment, phenotypic observation and physiological indexes evaluation

The MO seedlings were transferred to a variable-frequency refrigerator for -2℃ freezing treatment when they continue to grow for 30 days under normal conditions after been transplanted. 15 seedlings were treated and repeated three times. The apically third leaves were collected at 0 h, 3 h, 8 h, and 24 h, with three biological replicates at each time point. All materials were quickly frozen with liquid nitrogen and stored in -80℃ refrigerator for physiological index measurement.

Fresh leaves were collected and the relative electrolyte leakage (REL) was determined by a digital conductometer (Lichen, CT-20). The content of soluble sugar (Solarbio, Beijing, China), soluble protein (Geruisi, Suzhou, China), malondialdehyde (MDA, Jiancheng, Nanjing, China), proline (Real-Times, Beijing, China) and chlorophyll (Leagene, Beijing, China), the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD, Jiancheng, Nanjing, China) and peroxidase (POD, Jiancheng, Nanjing, China) were measured using the kits. All parameters were measured by an enzyme-labeled instrument (A51119700DPC) with three technical replications.

Microstructure observation

Samples were taken near the main veins and cut into 3 × 3 mm pieces. After completely immersed in FAA fixative solution (5% formalin, 5% glacial acetic acid and 90% ethanol) for 24 h, the series alcohol dehydrated, xylene transparent, paraffin embedded, sectioned, safranin fast green stained, placed under an optical microscope for observation and photograph. The thickness of leaf, palisade tissue and sponge tissue were measured (ImageJ V1.8.0.112). Then the organizational structure closely degrees (CRT, thickness ratio of palisade cell to leaf), organizational structure loose degrees (SR, thickness ratio of sponge tissue to leaf), and P/I value (thickness ratio of palisade cell to sponge tissue) were calculated.

Total RNA extraction, library construction and transcriptome sequencing

Total RNA was extracted using the TransZol Up Plus RNA Kit (Transgen, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration and purity of the RNA were assessed with the NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific, USA), and the RNA integrity was measured by the Agilent 4200 Bioanalyzer. Qualified RNAs were taken for cDNA library construction using the NEBNext® Ultra™ RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (NEB, USA). Then sequencing was carried out using the Illumina Novaseq 6000 platform (Illumina, USA) with a paired-end reads length of 150 bp at Science Corporation of Gene (Guangzhou, China). The amount of sequencing data per sample was not less than 6 Gb.

Transcriptome assembly, annotation and differential expression analysis of genes

The sequencing results were transformed into raw sequences after base identification by CASAVA. The raw reads were first processed through in-house Perl scripts, and high-quality clean reads were obtained after filtering out the reads containing connectors and low-quality reads. High-throughput sequencing data were assembled into transcript using the Trinity strategy. Unigene annotation was based on Nr (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), Uniprot (https://www.uniprot.org/), KEGG (https://www.kegg.jp/.) and KOG/COG (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/) databases [35,36,37,38]. The clean reads of each sample were compared to the assembled non-redundant transcripts using hisat2 v2.1.0 [39]. The TPM and FPKM values of each transcript were calculated by stringtie v1.3.3b based on the comparison results, with |log2FC|≥ 2 and P < 0.05 as the screening criteria for significantly differentially expressed genes [40]. They were subjected to GO, KOG and KEGG enrichment analysis, and entries with P < 0.05 were considered significantly enriched.

qRT-PCR analysis for differentially expressed genes

To verify the reliability of transcriptome results, 10 significant DEGs associated with freezing response were screened for qRT-PCR analysis in this study. The total RNA of the samples was reverse transcribed using the TransScript Uni All-in-One First-Stand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix for qPCR kit (Transgen, Beijing, China). According to the manufacturer’s instructions, the qRT-PCR was carried out with a qtower3 real-time PCR instrument (Jena, Germany) using the Perfect Start Green qPCR Super Mix kit (Transgen, Beijing, China). Transcript levels were normalized against the average expression of the CYP gene. All primer sequences were listed in Table S1. Each reaction contained 10 μl of 2 × Perfectstar green qPCR Supermix, 0.4 μl of the forward primers (10 μM), 0.4 μl of reverse primers (10 μM), 2 μl of the cDNA and finally made up to 20 μl with nuclease-free water. Three biological and technical replicates were performed for each sample. The qRT-PCR reaction system was as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 5 s, and annealing at 60 °C for 34 s. The relative expression levels of target genes were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s multiple range test (SPSS 25.0, SPSS Inc., IL, USA). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 represent significant differences at the 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001 levels, respectively.

Results

Phenotypic changes to freezing treatment

We explored the optimal freezing conditions of MO seedlings (Fig. 1). The leaves of MO seedlings were slightly wilted when frozen at 4 °C and 0 °C for 24 h but recovered when transferred to room temperature for 48 h. The damage degree to seedlings deepened with the decrease in temperature. After 24 h of freezing stress at -2 °C, the leaves and petioles of MO were severely dehydrated and wilted. Some of them could not recover when placed at room temperature for 48 h, and the average survival rate of MO was 70.0% (Fig. 2). Freezing at -4℃ for 24 h, MO seedlings were almost dehydrated and did not recover. Therefore -2 °C was selected as the treatment condition for the subsequent experiment.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The morphological characterization of MO seedlings under different freezing treatments (4, 0, -2, -4℃)

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

The survival rate of MO seedlings under different freezing treatments

Full size image

We also found differences in the morphological changes of MO when exposed to -2℃ for 0 h, 3 h, 8 h and 24 h. The leaves of MO seedlings showed mild freezing injury symptoms at the early stage (3 h). After 8 h freezing treatment, the petioles of MO seedlings began to dehydrate and wilt. At 24 h, they had apparent freezing injury symptoms, even lodging occurred in some plants (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The morphological changes of MO seedlings at -2℃ treating for a 0 h, b 3 h, c 8 h and d 24 h

Full size image

Microstructural changes to freezing treatment

We further observed the microstructural changes of MO leaves under freezing treatment. As shown in Fig. 4, the palisade and sponge cells of MO were neatly arranged at 0 h. There was little difference between the treatment group (3 h) and the control group. Stressed for 8 h, the spongy tissues were sparse and the palisade cell were reduced. After continuously stressing for 24 h, the spongy cells relatively crumpled into clusters and appeared cavities. The thickness of leaves, palisade tissue and sponge tissue of MO for different freezing times was measured (Fig. 5 and Table S2). Results showed that organizational structure closely degrees (CRT) and the thickness ratio of palisade tissue to sponge tissue (P/I) decreased, while the loose degrees (SR) increased.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The microstructural changes of MO leaves at -2℃ for different freezing times (0, 3, 8, 24 h). EP: epidermal cells, SP: spongy tissues, PA: palisade cell. × 10 and × 20 represent magnifications are 10 and 20

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

The value of CRT, SR and P/I changes of MO leaves at -2℃ for different freezing times (0, 3, 8, 24 h). CRT: organizational structure closely degrees, SR: organizational structure loose degrees, P/I: the thickness ratio of palisade tissue to sponge tissue

Full size image

Physiological changes to freezing treatment

The REL (Fig. 6a) and MDA content (Fig. 6b) of MO seedlings increased with the prolongation of freezing time, while the chlorophyll content decreased gradually (Fig. 6c), indicating that the continuous freezing caused irreversible damage to the biofilm. Freezing stimulation also promoted the accumulation of osmoregulation substances in plants to adapt to adversity. The content of proline and soluble protein increased with the extension of freezing time and decreased after 8 h (Fig. 6d and e). The soluble sugar content had no significant changes at the early freezing stage, yet sharply increased to 44.53 mg/g at 24 h (Fig. 6f). The antioxidant system also involved in MO freezing response process. The activity of SOD and POD in the treatment group was higher than in the control group (Fig. 6g and h).

Fig. 6
figure 6

The physiological changes of MO seedlings at -2℃ for different freezing times. a Relative electrolyte leakage; b MDA content; c chlorophyll content; d proline content; e soluble protein content; f soluble sugar content; g SOD activity; h POD activity. The data represents mean ± SD (n = 3), and the different letters above the bar represent the values were significant difference with different freezing times (P < 0.05, Duncan’s test). U: Each milligram of tissue protein is defined as an SOD activity unit when the inhibition rate reaches 50% in 1 ml of reaction solution

Full size image

Transcriptome sequencing and assembly

To investigate the molecular mechanism related to freezing resistance of MO, we used RNA-seq approach to profile the leaves of large leaf species at 0 h, 3 h, 8 h, and 24 h exposure to -2 °C. In this study, 12 library reads were obtained. After filtering, clean reads varied from 19 to 27 million (Table S4). The content of GC was between 43.43% to 45.84%. Q20 value ranged from 96.87% to 97.31% and Q30 value range from 92.17% to 93.07%, indicating that the sequencing data were reliable.

The Trinity assembly strategy was used to splice the clean reads to obtain the reference sequences for subsequent analysis (Fig. S1). A total of 60,507 unigenes were obtained, with an average length of 1236 bp, N50 length of 2914 bp and N90 length of 423 bp. More sequences lengths in the range of 1 ~ 500 bp, indicating that the transcriptome data assembly was high quality and met the requirements for in-depth analysis.

Functional annotation and analysis of genes

A total of 60,507 unigenes corresponding functional annotation information were obtained (Fig. S2), of which 24,425 (40.37%) were annotated in the UniProt database, accounting for the largest proportion. Following by 22,249 (36.77%) unigenes were obtained in the Nr database, 17,222 (28.46%) unigenes were annotated in the GO database, 13,101 (21.65%) unigenes were annotated to the KOG database, and 5661 (9.36%) unigenes were annotated to the KEGG database. There were 23,904 (39.51%) unigenes that had an annotation in at least one database. In addition, due to the unclear genetic background of MO, most unigenes (59.51%) had not been annotated.

According to the species distribution statistics of the most similar genes aligned in the Nr database (Fig. S3), Coffea arabica accounted for 7874 (47.22%), with the highest similarity. Followed by Coffea eugenioides accounting for 4100 (24.59%) and Coffea canephora accounting for 2548 (15.28%).

In this study, the GO functional annotation results showed that 52,994 unigenes were classified into three major categories of biological processes, cellular components and molecular functions, and further divided into 36 subcategories (Fig. 7a). Among them, the unigenes involved in biological processes and molecular functions were the main components. In the biological processes, unigenes annotated as cellular processes had the largest percentage (8863), followed by metabolic process and biological regulation, which annotated 7895 and 1851 unigenes, respectively. The highest proportion of unigenes participated in cellular anatomical entity with 9105 unigenes in the cellular components category. In the molecular function category, unigenes accounting for the highest proportions were binding and catalytic activity, with 9174 and 8369 unigenes, respectively.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Functional annotation and analysis of unigenes. a The histogram of GO enrichment analysis; b The histogram of KOG enrichment analysis; c The histogram of KEGG enrichment analysis

Full size image

The KOG terms were assigned to 11,831 unigenes, of which functional annotation were divided into 25 categories (Fig. 7b). Most of them were distributed to cell processes and signals, including signal transduction mechanisms and posttranslational modification, with 1091 and 947 unigenes, respectively. In the information storage and processing classification, 487 unigenes were enriched in transcription. Importantly, there were 447 and 359 unigenes annotated to carbohydrate transport and metabolism, secondary metabolite synthesis, transport and metabolism in the metabolism category.

Blastp was used to compare all assembled unigenes sequences with the KEGG protein database to determine the most important biochemical metabolic pathway and signal transduction pathway involved in the genes (Fig. 7c). KEGG annotated 4992 unigenes mapped to 138 biological signaling pathways, mainly including metabolism, genetic information processing and environmental information processing. Among them, 444 unigenes were enriched in carbohydrate metabolism pathway, 291 unigenes were annotated to amino acid metabolism pathway and 240 unigenes were annotated to the lipid metabolism pathway.

Screening differentially expressed genes

To explore which resistance-responded genes related to improve the freezing stress, we constructed a comparative analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the freezing-treated and control groups (Fig. 8). There were 257 (151 upregulated genes and 106 downregulated genes), 729 (357 upregulated genes and 372 downregulated genes) and 2266 (1265 upregulated genes and 1001 downregulated genes) DEGs were identified at 3 h, 8 h and 24 h, respectively, suggesting that the gene expression was less changed in the initial response stage of chilling stress.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Number of DEGs in different freezing times. a 3 h_vs_0 h; b 8 h_vs_0 h; c 24 h_vs_0 h

Full size image

Functional analysis of differentially expressed genes

Family enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes

The results of family enrichment analysis showed that there were 26, 29 and 32 DEGs enriched in 3 h_vs_0 h, 8 h_vs_0 h and 24 h_vs_0 h group, respectively. Compared with the control group (0 h), the DEGs were significantly enriched in the “glucosyl/ glucuronosyl transferases”, “oxidoreductase” and “calcium binding protein” family after 3 h freezing (Fig. 9a). After 8 h stressing, the DEGs were enriched in “oxidoreductase”, “endo-1,4-beta-glucanase”, “calcium binding protein” and “glucosyl/glucuronosyl transferases” family (P < 0.1) (Fig. 9b). After 24 h continuous freezing, the DEGs were significantly enriched in the “glucosyl/glucuronosyl transferases”, “proline-rich protein” and “chlorophyll a/b binding protein” family (Fig. 9c). To sum up, the DEGs of MO were co-expressed in the “glucosyl/ glucuronosyl transferases” family under the three freezing stress stages.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Family enrichment analysis of DEGs in different freezing times. a 3 h_vs_0 h; b 8 h_vs_0 h; c 24 h_vs_0 h

Full size image

KEGG enrichment analysis of differential genes

KEGG annotation showed that the DEGs were significantly enriched in “MAPK signaling pathway”, “plant hormone signal transduction” and “glucosinolate biosynthesis” at 3 h (Fig. 10a). At 8 h, the DEGs were significantly enriched in “plant hormone signal transduction”, “MAPK signaling pathway” and “starch and sucrose metabolism” (Fig. 10b). At 24 h, the DEGs were significantly enriched in the “plant-pathogen interaction”, “starch and sucrose metabolism” and “phenylpropanoid biosynthesis” (Fig. 10c).

Fig. 10
figure 10

KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs in different freezing times. a 3 h_vs_0 h; b 8 h_vs_0 h; c 24 h_vs_0 h

Full size image

In the plant hormone signal transduction pathway, there were 7 DEGs whose expression levels varied significantly under freezing stress. These genes are mainly involved in the abscisic acid and auxin signaling process (Fig. 11). In addition, there were 10 DEGs enriched in the starch and sucrose metabolism pathway, which were mainly involved in starch degradation and trehalose synthesis (Fig. 12).

Fig. 11
figure 11

Heat map of DEGs related to plant hormone signal transduction pathway

Full size image
Fig. 12
figure 12

Heat map of DEGs related to starch and sucrose metabolism pathway

Full size image

Differential expression analysis of transcription factors

There were 22 DEGs enriched in 7 main transcription factor types (Fig. 13 and Table 1), including 10 MYBs, 7 AP2/ERFs (RAVs, ERFs and DREBs), 1 NAC, 1 WRKY, 1 ZFP, 1 bHLH and 1 CAMTA. Among these differentially expressed transcription factors, the number of upregulated expression (13 genes) was greater than that of downregulated expression (9 genes). Among them, the expression levels of unigene03186, unigene039744, unigene032696, and unigene002153 have a higher multiple of changes (|log2FC|≥ 4), indicating that these transcription factors actively responded to freezing defense responses.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Heat map constructed based on FPKM expression values of a AP2/ERFs and b MYBs

Full size image
Table 1 FPKM values of differentially expressed TF in different freezing times
Full size table

Gene expression level validation by qRT-PCR

To validate the quality of RNA-seq data, we selected 10 genes with a high fold-change in the “glucosyl/glucuronosyl transferases” family enriched in three stress stages for qRT-PCR analysis (Fig. 14). Results showed that the relative expression of unigene015048, unigene056205, unigene002421, unigene059462, unigene036789 and unigene014952 decreased significantly with the extended time. In addition, the expression levels of unigene000269, unigene023278, unigene057427 and unigene 037305 were increased significantly by freezing treatment. Although the fold-change in the expression level detected by qRT-PCR did not completely match the RNA-seq results, the expression patterns of all candidate genes under these two detection methods were similar.

Fig. 14
figure 14

The qRT-PCR results of the DGEs related to freezing resistance. Error bars represent standard errors of the relative expression levels mean values by qRT-PCR (n = 3) (left y-axis). Broken lines represent the change in FPKM values of RNA-Seq (right y-axis)

Full size image

Discussion

Changes to morphology, physiology and microstructure under freezing stress

When plants are subjected to low temperatures, the membrane should be firstly damaged [41]. The destruction of the membrane system may eventually lead to a large amount of solute outflow, matrix imbalance and metabolic disorder. At the same time, the lipid peroxidation produced abundant MDA, causing a cross-linking polymerization of proteins, nucleic acids and other macromolecules, which was toxic to cells [42, 43]. In addition, plants would suffer from different degrees of dehydration under low-temperature stress. Osmoregulation is an adaptive response to low-temperature stress by accumulating metabolites to raise the concentration of cellular fluids, reduce osmotic potential, and thus maintain normal cell turgor pressure and metabolism [44,45,46]. The soluble protein, soluble sugar and proline are important osmotic adjustment substances for plants to defense against freezing stress. Our results suggested that the response of MO seedlings to freezing stress was complex physiological changes. Over the 24 h course of freezing stress, there was an increase in REL, MDA and proline contents, and amount of soluble protein and sugar (Fig. 6). The CRT value decreased and the SR value increased, which suggests that the palisade tissue and spongy tissue of MO leaves exposed to freezing stress were damaged (Fig. 5). Compared with palisade cells, sponge tissue was more severely damaged (Fig. 4). Furthermore, the decrease of chlorophyll content may be related to inhibition of synthesis or acceleration of catabolism [47].

The antioxidant system reduces ROS and promote the freezing tolerance ability [48, 49]. Therefore, the increase of POD and SOD activities may play a critical role in eliminating ROS induced by low temperatures in MO leaves (Fig. 6). The roots of MO are abundant in oligosaccharides that are associated with the freezing resistance, such as Panax ginseng [50] and Arnebia euchroma [51] were also found this phenomenon. At the same time, the content of oligosaccharides in the roots of MO seedlings after freezing treatment was detected by HPLC-ELSD. However, the results showed that nystose was not detected, which may be accumulated gradually during the process of prolonged growth in MO. Taken together, these results of physiological changes indicated that MO seedlings had developed the ability to withstand short-period freezing stress, laying a foundation for its introduction to the north of Guangdong.

Plant hormone signal transduction under freezing stress

Plant hormones not only participate in the process of growth and development, but also serve as a key endogenous factor mediating stress response. Plants resist and adapt to adversities by transmitting external environmental stimuli to multiple hormone signal transduction pathways [52, 53].

Studies show that freezing stress promoted the increase of ABA content, which further induced the expression of freezing response genes [54, 55]. PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors, located upstream of the ABA signal pathway, were important to recognize and start the primary process of ABA signal transduction [56]. After binding with ABA, PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors interacted with class A protein phosphatase PP2C, ABI and HAB to form PYR/PYL/RCAR-PP2C complexes, which inhibited the activity of protein phosphatase and started ABA signal transduction [57]. Our research showed that the expression level of PYL4(unigene036836) increased rapidly in the early stage of freezing stress in MO (Fig. 11). Ren et al. found that overexpression of VaPYL4 gene could enhance the freezing tolerance in grape callus [58]. In addition, the freezing response depends on auxin homeostasis in different plant tissues. Polar auxin transport was regulated by AUX1/LAX inflow vectors, PIN efflux vectors and ABCB/MDR/PGP [59, 60]. We found that auxin response protein genes such as unigene030516, unigene044149, unigene014764 and unigene017859 were significantly induced by freezing stress (Fig. 11). Previous studies have shown that a considerable number of auxin regulation related genes were induced by low temperature [61,62,63,64]. Hence, auxin related DEGs may play an important role in MO responses to freezing stress.

Transcription factor expression under freezing stress

Transcription factors (TFs) activate the expression of freezing responsive genes by binding to cis acting elements of the promoters, regulating signal transduction pathways in plants to improve freezing tolerance. The differential freezing response TFs of MO were significantly enriched in MYB, NAC and AP2/ERF families. AP2/ERF family members include AP2, RAV, ERF and DREB, among which DREB and ERF subfamily members are ideal candidate genes for crop improvement [65]. The pathways of plants response to freezing stress are divided into ABA-dependent and ABA-independent signal transduction pathways. There are two main types of DREB genes (DREB1 and DREB2) in Arabidopsis. The DREB1 genes are ABA-independent, and partial DREB2 genes are ABA-dependent, while others are all involved in ABA-dependent response pathways [66, 67]. When plants were exposed to the freezing environment, they would firstly transmit low temperature signals in the form of Ca2+. The calmodulin binding protein activator (CAMTA) activated the expression of DREBs, which positively induced the expression of downstream freezing resistance genes dependent on DRE/CRT cis-acting elements [68, 69]. Our studies indicated that CAMTA1 (unigene039744) gene was significantly induced in the MO freezing process (Table 1), which may further activate DREB1 (unigene023745) gene to respond to low temperature signal transmission (Fig. 13a). In addition, we also found that DREB2C (unigene031863) gene was significantly up-regulated at the early stage and persistently overexpressed (Fig. 13a), suggesting that its mechanism of action might be related to ABA. Studies have shown that the AmDREB2C gene of Ammopiptanthus mongolicus responded strongly to low temperature. Overexpression of AmDREB2C enhanced the freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis, which was sensitive to exogenous ABA [70]. Lee et al. [71] found that DREB2C interacted with ABF2, which regulated the expression of ABA response genes. Overexpression of ABF2 can enhance the freezing tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis and affect ABA sensitivity. Therefore, the signal conduction mechanism of DREB2C may be related to ABA.

ERF family also plays an important role in response to low temperature. In this study, ERFs such as unigene039160, unigene029774, unigene016214 and unigene036025 were significantly induced by low temperature, among which ERF1 (unigene039160) was continuously down regulated during the whole freezing process (Fig. 13a). Previous studies have illustrated that there was a complex interaction between ABA, ethylene and ERFs. For example, ERF1, JERF1 and TSRF1 regulated the biosynthesis of ABA, while ABA negatively regulated the expression of ERF1 [72]. Besides, our studies suggested that MYB4 (unigene048676) positively responded to freezing stress (Fig. 13b). MYB4 reversely induced PAL2, ScD9SAD and COR15a promoters under low temperature, and its overexpression can enhance freezing resistance [73]. In addition, NAC genes were involved in different hormone signal transduction in the stress response process. Studies showed that the expression level of OoNAC72 was significantly increased after exogenous ABA stimulation [74]. We found that the continuously up-regulated NAC72 (unigene033097) may participate in the MO freezing response process through ABA dependent signal pathway (Table 1).

Carbohydrate and proline metabolism under freezing stress

Carbohydrate metabolism is the basis for maintaining cell life. Carbon energy mainly comes from starch degradation. The enzymes and genes involved in starch degradation are crucial to carbohydrate metabolism. In this study, the “carbohydrate metabolism” pathway was significantly enriched in “starch and sucrose metabolism” and “pentose and glucuronate interconversions”. The expression of sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS, unigene029215) and fructose kinase (unigene027283) genes were significantly up-regulated after 24 h freezing stress (Fig. 12). Carbohydrate transport of advanced plants was mainly in the form of sucrose, which was synthesized by SPS. SPS catalyzes fructose 6-phosphate and UDPG to generate sucrose 6-phosphate, which generates sucrose through the catalysis of phosphorylase (SPP). SPS activity was positively correlated with sucrose accumulation and starch decomposition [75]. Thus, the soluble sugar content of MO increased under the continuous freezing treatment. Carbohydrate plays many roles in improving freezing resistance, including osmotic regulation, sugar signal transduction, and antioxidation [76].

Glycosylation is a modification reaction of natural compounds in plants. Glycosyltransferases (GTs) perform glycosylation, enabling substrate molecules to add sugar groups by catalyzing the formation of glycosidic bonds to form more stable natural glycosides or glycolipids [77]. A large number of studies have shown that GTs were involved in stress response, secondary metabolite synthesis and hormone regulation. For example, UGT76F1 regulated the auxin level in Arabidopsis through IPyA glycosylation [78]; CsUGT75C1 improved the cold resistance of tea plants by regulating the synthesis of anthocyanins [79]; AhUGT83A1 was involved in the regulation of peanut resistance to drought, low temperature and salinity [80]. Interestingly, the “glucosyl/glucuronosyltransferase” family was significantly enriched after 24 h freezing treatment in this study. The expressions of unigene015048, unigene037705, unigene036789, unigene056205, unigene059462 and unigene014952 genes was significantly induced by low temperature (Fig. 14). The qRT-PCR results were consistent with the RNA-seq data. In addition, our previous research found that the “glucosyl/glucuronosyltransferase” family may participate in the biosynthesis of MO oligosaccharides, which speculated that the content of oligosaccharides increased, thus improving the freezing resistance of MO [81].

Proline accumulation is a self-regulation for plants to cope with low temperature stress. Both the decrease of proline degradation and the increase of proline synthesis are the main factors leading to its accumulation. When plants were exposed to stress, proteins would be largely decomposed into NH3, and excess NH3 was toxic to cells. Plants converted NH3 into glutamate and ornithine through various amino acid exchanges, amino acylation and transaminases, and finally synthesize proline [82]. Δ1-Dihydropyrrol-5-carboxylate synthase (P5CS) and proline dehydro-genase (ProDH) are crucial for proline synthesis and degradation [83]. In this study, the expression of the ProDH (unigene009207) gene was significantly downregulated at the early stages of freezing stress (3 ~ 8 h), indicating that low temperature inhibited its expression and alleviated the degradation of proline at the transcriptional level (Table S8). However, the expression of the P5CDH gene was no significant change, suggesting no synergistic effect between P5CDH and ProDH in improving MO freezing resistance. At the same time, the expression of glutamine synthetase (GS, unigene059066) was also significantly down-regulated, hindering the synthesis of glutamine and inhibiting the process of ammonium assimilation. Therefore, we inferred that the proline content of MO increased by inhibiting the degradation process, rather than by promoting its synthesis process. The proline content in MO increased sharply at the early freezing stage, and then its content decreased, but remained higher than 0 h, which was consistent with the above results. Meanwhile, the increase of proline would negatively regulate the expression of the P5CS (unigene024763) gene [84].

Conclusions

In this study, physiological and transcriptomic analyses were performed to reveal the potential mechanisms by which MO responded to freezing stress. The results showed that leaf dehydration, palisade cell and spongy mesophyll destruction occurred when MO seedlings were exposed to -2 °C. The increased REL and MDA content suggested that the membrane of MO was damaged. A decrease in chlorophyll content indicated that the chloroplasts were damaged. Meanwhile, low temperature stimulated the freezing resistance response of MO, and the content of a series of osmoregulatory substances such as proline, soluble sugar and soluble protein were increased, as well as the activity of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD and POD were up-regulated. The dynamic change pattern of oligosaccharides in roots of MO under freezing stress would require further study. Furthermore, the molecular freezing response mechanism of MO may be related to plant hormone signaling transduction, transcription factor regulation, and gene expression of carbohydrate and proline metabolic pathways. Our research provides new insight into antifreeze molecular breeding of MO and lays a foundation for improving the quality of MO.

Availability of data and materials

RNA sequence data were deposited in NCBI under the BioProject accession number PRJNA944555.

References

  1. National Pharmacopoeia Commission. Pharmacopoeia of the People's Republic of China[S]. Beijing: China Medical Science and Technology Press; 2020:83.

  2. Luan ZL, Qiao F, Zhao WY, Ming WH, Yu ZL, Liu J, Dai SY, Jiang SH, Lian CJ, Sun CP, Zhang BJ, Zheng J, Ma SC, Ma XC. Discovery of new iridoids as FXR agonists from Morinda officinalis: agonistic potentials and molecular stimulations. Chin J Chem. 2020;39:1288–96.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yang F, Su YF, Zhao ZQ, Que M, Li TX, Gao XM. Anthraquinones and iridoids from Morinda officinalis. Chem Nat Compd. 2016;52:989–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Xu H, Liu L, Chen Y, Ma H, Li M, Qu W, Yin J, Zhang X, Gao Y, Shan J, Gao Y. The chemical character of polysaccharides from processed Morindae officinalis and their effects on anti-liver damage. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;141:410–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhai HJ, Yu JH, Zhang Q, Liu HS, Zhang JS, Song XQ, Zhang Y, Zhang H. Cytotoxic and antibacterial triterpenoids from the roots of Morinda officinalis var. officinalis. Fitoterapia. 2019;133:56–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chi L, Khan I, Lin Z, Zhang J, Lee MYS, Leong W, Hsiao WLW, Zheng Y. Fructo-oligosaccharides from Morinda officinalis remodeled gut microbiota and alleviated depression features in a stress rat model. Phytomedicine. 2019;67:153–7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang K, Huang D, Zhang D, Wang X, Cao H, Zhang Q, Yan C. Investigation of inulins from the roots of Morinda officinalis for potential therapeutic application as anti-osteoporosis agent. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;120:170–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang D, Zhang S, Jiang K, Li T, Yan C. Bioassay-guided isolation and evaluation of anti-osteoporotic polysaccharides from Morinda officinalis. J Ethnopharmacol. 2020;261:113113.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Luo Z, Chen Z, Liu M, Yang L, Zhao Z, Yang D, Ding P. Phenotypic, chemical component and molecular assessment of genetic diversity and population structure of Morinda officinalis germplasm. BMC Genomics. 2022;23:605.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin L, Xu H, Yao Y, Wang S, Deng P, Zhen Y. Effect of Morinda officinalis Fusarium wilt on host microstructure and components. Chin J Chin Mater Med. 1993;7:401–3+446.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Xu J, Cheng R. A preliminary report on Morinda officinalis Fusarium wilt and its control. Subtrop Plant Sci. 1979;1:3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shi X, Qi P. Identification of pathogen of Morinda officinalis Fusarium wilt. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica. 1988;3:137–42.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fu R, Xing X, Wu F, Sheng Q, Zhao L, Wu G, Yang X. A study on suitability evaluation of Panax notoginseng in Xundian County, Yunnan Province based on GIS and RS. J Wenshan Univ. 2022;35(5):8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang X, Chen M, Huang L, Guo L, Ge X, Lin S, Wu Z. Study on ecology suitability regionalization of Rehmanniag lutinosa Libosch. Planting in China. Chin J Inform Tradit Chin Med. 2011;18(5):55–6+59.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yang L, Cai M, Liu M, F, Lin M, Ding P. Quality evaluation of Morinda officinalis after the introduction. Lishizhen Med Mater Med Res. 2021;32(12):2998–3001.

  16. Ouyang L, Leus L, De Keyser E, Van Labeke MC. Seasonal changes in cold hardiness and carbohydrate metabolism in four garden rose cultivars. J Plant Physiol. 2019;232:188–99.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yue C, Cao HL, Wang L, Zhou YH, Huang YT, Hao XY, Wang YC, Wang B, Yang YJ, Wang XC. Effects of cold acclimation on sugar metabolism and sugar related gene expression in tea plant during the winter season. Plant Mol Biol. 2015;88(6):591.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hajihashemi S, Noedoost F, Geuns JMC, Djalovic I, Siddique KHM. Effect of cold stress on photosynthetic traits, carbohydrates, morphology, and anatomy in nine cultivars of Stevia rebaudiana. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9(4):1430.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu Q, Li Z, Chen X, Yun Z, Li T, Jiang Y. Comparative metabolites profiling of harvested papaya (Carica papaya L.) peel in response to chilling stress. J Sci Food Agric. 2019;99(15):6868–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang Z, Li J, Pan Y, Li J, Zhou L, Shi H, Zeng Y, Guo H, Yang S, Zheng W, Yu J, Sun X, Li G, Ding Y, Ma L, Shen S, Dai L, Zhang H, Yang S, Guo Y, Li Z. Natural variation in CTB4a enhances rice adaptation to cold habitats. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14788.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Cheng H, Chen X, Fang J, An Z, Hu Y, Huang H. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals an early gene expression profile that contributes to cold resistance in Hevea brasiliensis (the Para rubber tree). Tree Physiol. 2018;38:1409–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhu JK. Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell. 2016;167:313–24.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ma Y, Dai X, Xu Y, Luo W, Zheng X, Zeng D, Pan Y, Lin X, Liu H, Zhang D, Xiao J, Guo X, Xu S, Niu Y, Jin J, Zhang H, Xu X, Li L, Wang W, Qian Q, Ge S, Chong K. COLD1 confers chilling tolerance in rice. Cell. 2015;160:1209–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Guo X, Liu D, Chong K. Cold signaling in plants: insights into mechanisms and regulation. J Integr Plant Biol. 2018;60:745–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang J, Li XM, Lin HX, Chong K. Crop improvement through temperature resilience. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2019;70:753–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Molecular responses to dehydration and low temperature: differences and cross-talk between two stress signaling pathways. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2000;3(3):217–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chinnusamy V, Ohta M, Kanrar S, Lee BH, Hong X, Agarwal M, Zhu JK. ICE1: a regulator of cold-induced transcriptome and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2003;17(8):1043–54.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Heidari P, Reza Amerian M, Barcaccia G. Hormone profiles and antioxidant activity of cultivated and wild tomato seedlings under low-temperature stress. Agronomy. 2021;11:1146.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang C, Tian S. Peach fruit acquired tolerance to low temperature stress by accumulation of linolenic acid and N-acylphosphatidylethanolamine in plasma membrane. Food Chem. 2010;120(3):864–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gan P, Liu F, Li R, Wang S, Luo J. Chloroplasts-beyond energy capture and carbon fixation: tuning of photosynthesis in response to chilling stress. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(20):5046.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Shi Y, Ding Y, Yang S. Cold signal transduction and its interplay with phytohormones during cold acclimation. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015;56(1):7–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Qin MS. Recent advances of studies on the structure and function of the light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-protein complex. J Chin Bull Bot. 2000;17:289–301.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Uemura M, Tominaga Y, N chlorophyll akagawara C, Shigematsu S, Minamic A, Kawamurac Y. Responses of the plasma membrane to low temperatures. J Physiol Plant. 2010;126(1):81–89.

  34. Ding P, Luo ZH, Chen ZE, Feng C. A method for rapid propagation of tissue culture seedlings of Morinda officinalis and its application[P]. China Invention Patent ZL202210676371.6. 2023.

  35. Pradhan SK, Pandit E, Nayak DK, et al. Genes, pathways and transcription factors involved in seedling stage chilling stress tolerance in indica rice through RNA-Seq analysis. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19:352.

  36. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:27–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Kanehisa M. Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms. Protein Sci. 2019;28:1947–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Sato Y, et al. KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:D587–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods. 2015;12(4):357–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Pertea M, Pertea GM, Antonescu CM, et al. String Tie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33(3):290–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Lyons JM. Chilling injure in plants. Ann Rev Plant Physiol. 1973;24:445–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Lyons JM, Graham D, Raison JK. Low temperature stress in crop plants: the role of membrane. London: Academic Press; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Takahashi D, Uemura M, Kawamura Y. Freezing tolerance of plant cells: from the aspect of plasma membrane and microdomain. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1081:61–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Yu H, Zheng H, Liu Y, et al. Antifreeze protein from Ammopiptanthus nanus functions in temperature-stress through domain A. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):8458.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang W, Wang X, Lv Z, et al. Effects of cold and salicylic acid priming on free proline and sucrose accumulation in winter wheat under freezing stress. J Plant Growth Regul. 2022;41:2171–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Sami F, Yusuf M, Faizan M, et al. Role of sugars under abiotic stress. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016;109:54–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Jiang Z, Zhu H, Zhang Q, et al. Research progress on plant photosynthesis under low temperature stress. Crop. 2015;3:23–8.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Zhou J, Wang J, Shi K, Xia XJ, Zhou YH, Yu JQ. Hydrogen peroxide is involved in the cold acclimation-induced chilling tolerance of tomato plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2012;60:141–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Ruth GA, Neval E, Lenwood SH. Role of superoxide dismutases (SODs) in controlling oxidative stress in plants. J Exp Bot. 2002;53(372):1331–41.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang T. Physiological and ecological response mechanism of Panax ginseng and its saponins biosynthesis to low temperature[D]. Jilin: Jilin Agricultural University; 2019.

  51. Xie T. Biosynthesis researches of secondary metabolic in Arnebia euchroma[D]. Chengdu, China: Southwest Jiaotong University; 2014.

  52. Ha CV, Leyva-González MA, Osakabe Y, Tran UT, Nishiyama R, Watanabe Y, Tanaka M, Seki M, Yamaguchi S, Dong NV, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K, Herrera-Estrella L, Tran LS. Positive regulatory role of strigolactone in plant responses to drought and salt stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(2):851–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Verma V, Ravindran P, Kumar PP. Plant hormone-mediated regulation of stress responses. BMC Plant Biol. 2016;16(1):86.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Kim TH, Böhmer M, Hu H, Nishimura N, Schroeder JI. Guard cell signal transduction network: advances in understanding abscisic acid, CO2 and Ca2+ signaling. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010;61:561–91.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Cutler SR, Rodriguez PL, Finkelstein RR, Abrams SR. Abscisic acid: emergence of a core signaling network. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010;61:651–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Park SY, Fung P, Nishimura N, Jensen DR, Fujii H, Zhao Y, Lumba S, Santiago J, Rodrigues A, Chow TF, Alfred SE, Bonetta D, Finkelstein R, Provart NJ, Desveaux D, Rodriguez PL, McCourt P, Zhu JK, Schroeder JI, Volkman BF, Cutler SR. Abscisic acid inhibits type 2C protein phosphatases via the PYR/PYL family of START proteins. Science. 2009;324:1068–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Yi W, Wang J, Yang H, Tian Y, Lu X. Plant ABA receptors and the signal transduction pathways they mediate. Chin Bull Bot. 2012;47(5):515–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Ren C, Kuang Y, Lin Y, Guo Y, Li H, Fan P, Li S, Liang Z. Overexpression of grape ABA receptor gene VaPYL4 enhances tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2022;22(1):271.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Swarup R, Kargul J, Marchant A, Zadik D, Rahman A, Mills R, Yemm A, May S, Williams L, Millner P, Tsurumi S, Moore I, Napier R, Kerr ID, Bennett MJ. Structure-function analysis of the presumptive Arabidopsis auxin permease AUX1. Plant Cell. 2004;16:3069–83.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Petrásek J, Mravec J, Bouchard R, Blakeslee JJ, Abas M, Seifertová D, Wisniewska J, Tadele Z, Kubes M, Covanová M, Dhonukshe P, Skupa P, Benková E, Perry L, Krecek P, Lee OR, Fink GR, Geisler M, Murphy AS, Luschnig C, Zazímalová E, Friml J. PIN proteins perform a rate-limiting function in cellular auxin efflux. Science. 2006;312:914–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhang X. IAA involved in the mechanism of H2S induced chilling tolerance in Cucumber[D]. Shandong: Shandong Agricultural University; 2022.

  62. Yu C, Dong W, Zhan Y, Huang ZA, Li Z, Kim IS, Zhang C. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of ClLAX, ClPIN and ClABCB genes families in Citrullus lanatus under various abiotic stresses and grafting. BMC Genet. 2017;18:33.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Zhang C, Dong W, Huang ZA, Cho M, Yu Q, Wu C, Yu C. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the CaLAX and CaPIN gene families in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) under various abiotic stresses and hormone treatments. Genome. 2018;61(2):121–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Fei Q, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Liang L, Wu L, Gao H, Sun Y, Niu B, Li X. Effects of auxin and ethylene on root growth adaptation to different ambient temperatures in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2019;281:159–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Licausi F, Ohme-Takagi M, Perata P. APETALA2/Ethylene responsive factor (AP2/ERF) transcription factors: Mediators of stress responses and developmental programs. New Phytol. 2013;199(3):639–49.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Lata C, Prasad M. Role of DREBs in regulation of abiotic stress responses in plants. J Exp Bot. 2011;62(14):4731–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Erpen L, Devi HS, Grosser JW, Dutt M. Potential use of the DREB/ERF, MYB, NAC and WRKY transcription factors to improve abiotic and biotic stress in transgenic plants. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2017;132(1):1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Polisensky DH, Braam J. Cold-shock regulation of the Arabidopsis TCH genes and the effects of modulating intracellular calcium levels. Plant Physiol. 1996;111:1271–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Tähtiharju S, Sangwan V, Monroy AF, Dhindsa RS, Borg M. The induction of kin genes in cold-acclimating Arabidopsis thaliana. Evidence of a role for calcium. Planta. 1997;203:442–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Jiang X. Cloning and functional analysis of AmDREB2c and AmAtpD genes in Ammopiptanthus mongolicus[D]. Inner Mongolia: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University; 2014.

  71. Lee SJ, Kang JY, Park HJ, Kim MD, Bae MS, Choi HI, Kim SY. DREB2C interacts with ABF2, a bZIP protein regulating abscisic acid-responsive gene expression, and its overexpression affects abscisic acid sensitivity. Plant Physiol. 2010;153:716–27.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Cheng MC, Liao PM, Kuo WW, Lin TP. The Arabidopsis ethylene response factor1 regulates abiotic stress-responsive gene expression by binding to different cis-acting elements in response to different stress signals. Plant Physiol. 2013;162(3):1566–82.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Aydin G, Yucel M, Chan MT, Oktem HA. Evaluation of abiotic stress tolerance and physiological characteristics of potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Kennebec) that heterologously expresses the rice Osmyb4 gene. Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2014;8(3):295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Guan H. Molecular cloning and functional analysis of a NAC gene OoNAC72 from Oxytropis ochrocephala Bunge[D]. Xi'an: Northwestern University; 2018.

  75. Huber SC, Huber JL. Role of sucrose-phosphate synthase in sucrose metabolism in leaves. Plant Physiol. 1992;99:1275–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Van den Ende W, Valluru R. Sucrose, sucrosyl oligosaccharides, and oxidative stress: scavenging and salvaging. J Exp Bot. 2009;60:9–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Li Q, Yu HM, Meng XF, Lin JS, Li YJ, Hou BK. Ectopic expression of glycosyltransferase UGT76E11 increases flavonoid accumulation and enhances abiotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Biol. 2018;20(1):10–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Chen L. Function and molecular mechanisms of glucosyltransferase genes UGT76F1 and UGT71C3 in Arabidopsis[D]. Shandong: Shandong University; 2020.

  79. Shen J, Zhang D, Zhou L, Zhang X, Liao J, Duan Y, Wen B, Ma Y, Wang Y, Fang W, Zhu X. Transcriptomic and metabolomic profiling of Camellia sinensis L. cv. ‘Suchazao’ exposed to temperature stresses reveals modification in protein synthesis and photosynthetic and anthocyanin biosynthetic pathways. Tree Physiol. 2019;39(9):1583–99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Chen N, Hu D, Pan L, Chi X, Chen M, Wang T, Wang M, Yang Z, Yu S. Cloning of UDP-glucosyltransferase gene from peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and its expression analysis during abiotic stress. Chin J Oil Crop Sci. 2014;36(3):308–15.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Liu M, Yang L, Cai M, Feng C, Zhao Z, Yang D, Ding P. Transcriptome analysis reveals important candidate gene families related to oligosaccharides biosynthesis in Morinda offfcinalis. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2021;167:1061–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Yao Y. Accumulation of proline in plants under stress. J Beijing Univ Agric. 1986;6:107–13.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Verbruggen N, Hermans C. Proline accumulation in plants: a review. Amino Acids. 2008;35:753–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Nanjo T, Kobayashi M, Yoshiba Y, Sanada Y, Wada K, Tsukaya H, Kakubari Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Biological functions of proline in morphogenesis and osotolerance revealed in antisense transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1999;18:185–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful for the technical support and theoretical guidance provided by the Science Corporation of Gene, Guangzhou. We thank Dexin Agricultural Development Company Limited in Guangdong for provide the samples, we also would like to acknowledge our colleagues for their suggestions and revisions to the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Guangzhou Key R&D Project (No.202206010010), Guangdong Provincial Rural Revitalization Strategy Special Project (No.2021KJ268) and Guangdong Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation and Promotion Project (No. 2022KJ142 & 2021KJ142 & 2020KJ142 & 2019KJ142).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510006, China

    Zhenhua Luo, Xiaoying Che, Panpan Han, Zien Chen, Zeyu Chen, Jinfang Chen, Sishi Xiang & Ping Ding

Authors
  1. Zhenhua Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaoying Che
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Panpan Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zien Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zeyu Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jinfang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sishi Xiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ping Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PD conceived and designed the studies. ZL analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. XC, PH, ZiC and SX participated in data analyses and experiments. ZyC and JC provided suggestions for the manuscript. PD revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ping Ding.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The current study complies with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation for experimental research and field studies on plants (either cultivated or wild), including the collection of plant material. The plant materials involved in this study have been licensed for collection.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Primer sequences used for qRT-PCR. Table S2. Difference of microstructure parameters of MO leaves under different freezing time. Table S3. The physiological changes of MO seedlings under freezing stress. Table S4. Quality control of transcriptome. Table S5. FPKM values of DEGs related to plant hormone signal transduction pathway. Table S6. FPKM values of DEGs related to starch and sucrose metabolism pathway. Table S7. FPKM values of DEGs related to AP2/ERFs and MYBs. Table S8. FPKM values of DEGs related to proline synthesis and degradation pathways. Table S9. The results of qRT-PCR.

Additional file 2: Fig. S1.

The distribution of unigenes sequence length. Fig. S2. Number of gene annotations among different databases. Fig. S3. Gene quantity distribution of each species.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, Z., Che, X., Han, P. et al. Physiological and transcriptomic analysis reveals the potential mechanism of Morinda officinalis How in response to freezing stress. BMC Plant Biol 23, 507 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04511-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04511-5

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us