Skip to main content
Download PDF

Phytosulfokine contributes to suspension culture of Cunninghamia lanceolata through its impact on redox homeostasis

BMC Plant Biology volume 23, Article number: 480 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Suspension culture is widely used in the establishment of efficient plant regeneration systems, as well as in the mass production of plant secondary metabolites. However, the establishment of a suspension culture system of Cunninghamia lanceolata is genotype-dependent given that proembryogenic masses (PEMs) are prone to browning during this process in recalcitrant genotypes. Previously, we reported that the plant peptide hormone phytosulfokine (PSK) can tremendously decrease the hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) level and help to initiate somatic embryogenesis (SE) in recalcitrant C. lanceolata genotypes. However, to date, no studies have revealed whether or how PSK may contribute to the establishment of a suspension culture system in these recalcitrant genotypes.

Results

Here, we demonstrated that exogenous application of PSK effectively inhibited PEM browning during suspension culture in a recalcitrant genotype of C. lanceolata. Comparative time-series transcriptome profiling showed that redox homeostasis underwent drastic fluctuations when PEMs were cultured in liquid medium, while additional PSK treatment helped to maintain a relatively stable redox homeostasis. Interestingly, PSK seemed to have a dual effect on peroxidases (PRXs), with PSK simultaneously transcriptionally repressing ROS-producing PRXs and activating ROS-scavenging PRXs. Furthermore, determination of H2O2 and MDA content, as well as cell viability, showed that exogenous PSK treatment inhibited PEM browning and safeguarded PEM suspension culture by decreasing the H2O2 level and increasing PEM activity.

Conclusions

Collectively, these findings provide a valuable tool for the future establishment of large-scale C. lanceolata PEM suspension culture without genotype limitations.

Peer Review reports

Background

Somatic embryogenesis (SE) is a unique process in plants in which embryos form from somatic cells and develop into whole plants in a developmental path that closely resembles zygotic embryogenesis both morphologically and temporally [1]. Since its first report in research on carrot in 1958, SE has been believed to be one of the most powerful biotechnology tools and is widely used in both basic research and applied research [2]. One SE application is in the production of plants, especially in crops and forest trees, for commercial-scale clonal propagation [3]. SE can be classified into two general modes, i.e., direct and indirect SE, depending on whether or not embryogenic calli (or proembryogenic masses, PEMs) are formed [4]. In addition, a sharp distinction between these two SE pathways is that the propagation efficiency is much higher in indirect SE than in direct SE, which is important to consider when laying the foundation for application in industrialized seedling cultivation [5, 6]. However, embryogenic calli are normally induced to form somatic embryos and develop into whole regenerated plants on a solid medium during indirect SE, which cannot be used for large-scale propagation due to the insufficient regeneration efficiency and the poor synchrony of somatic embryo development [6]. An alternative method is to culture and propagate embryogenic calli in liquid medium, namely, with an embryogenic cell suspension culture system that has been well established for mass proliferation in many plant species, such as Euonymus alatus, coconut, and date palm [7,8,9]. In addition, embryogenic cell suspension culture together with successive plant regeneration systems via SE has provided an ideal platform for genetic transformation in multiple species, such as in citrus, Coffea arabica, and Liridoendron [10,11,12].

Cunninghamia lanceolata, also known as Chinese fir, is one of the main plantation trees in southern China, with an artificial forest area of 148 million acres and a forest stock volume of 755 million m3 according to the 9th National Inventory of Forest Resources (2014–2018) in China. The SE system for C. lanceolata was established in 2017, in which PEMs that had been induced from immature cones were in turn induced to form somatic embryos on solid medium supplemented with polyethylene glycol (PEG) and abscisic acid (ABA) [13, 14]. Furthermore, C. lanceolata PEMs have been synchronized in liquid suspension before somatic embryo induction, leading to the improvement of successive SE both in quantity and quality [14]. However, not all genotypes are suitable for suspension culture since PEMs of recalcitrant genotypes are prone to browning, which causes loss of cell viability and ultimately cell death. Browning is a ubiquitous phenomenon in plant cell culture, representing a primary barrier in the establishment of suspension culture systems [15, 16]. Browning in plant tissues is usually induced by cell/tissue damage that leads to the enzymatic oxidation of soluble phenolic compounds into quinones by polyphenol oxidases (PPOs) [17]. Normally, antioxidants and adsorbents are added to the medium to decrease the degree of browning [15, 18]. However, these additives sometimes have deleterious effects on cell cultures and have to be removed from the culture medium at a certain point [19, 20].

Phytosulfokine (PSK) belongs to a group of plant peptides and has been classified as a growth factor with extensive functions in growth regulation, stress responses, and reproductive development [21]. PSK was first identified as a chemical compound that was secreted into the older cell suspensions and that enabled the feeder effect to be overcome in suspension-cultured plant cells [22, 23]. In higher plants, PSK genes encode PSK precursors that are sulphated in the cis-Golgi and proteolytically processed in the apoplast [24, 25]. Mature PSK peptides are recognized by PSK receptors (PSKRs), which belong to the leucine-rich repeat receptor-like protein kinase (LRR-RLK) family [26]. In tomato, PSKR1 perceives PSK and increases cytosolic [Ca2+], leading to auxin-mediated immune responses [27]. Further research showed that PSKR1 interacts with the calcium-dependent protein kinase CPK28, leading to phosphorylation of two sites in glutamine synthetase GS2, one of which regulates plant defence and the other of which regulates growth in tomato [28]. In addition, in response to chilling stress, PSK application decreases reactive oxygen species (ROS) content in peach and increases proline and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) contents in banana [29, 30]. In our previous study, we found that PSK inhibits PEM browning and decreases H2O2 content, leading to the improvement of the SE system, especially in recalcitrant C. lanceolata genotypes. Here, by combining exogenous application of PSK, phenotype characterization, histological staining and comparative transcriptomics, we explored the potential function of PSK in the establishment of PEM suspension culture in a recalcitrant C. lanceolata genotype to investigate the maintenance of redox homeostasis and prevention of PEM browning.

Results

C. lanceolata PEM suspension culture and sampling

C. lanceolata PEMs consist of a clump of rounded densely cytoplasmic cells with several highly vacuolated cells [31]. In general, PEMs are transferred to the solid SE induction medium and induced to form somatic embryos [14]. However, this solid induction method is not suitable for large-scale production because of its limited reproductive efficiency and poor synchronization. Thus, it is important to develop a liquid suspension culture system with characteristics of rapid proliferation. Here, we established a PEM suspension culture system using the recalcitrant C. lanceolata genotype 4098–5, which is prone to browning when cultured in liquid medium but remains normal with additional exogenous PSK (Fig. 1a). 3,3'-Diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining showed obviously decreased H2O2 levels in the PEM cultures receiving PSK treatment compared to the nontreatment control (Fig. 1b). In addition, Evans blue staining indicated that the PEMs were less active under control conditions than under PSK treatment (Fig. 1c). These results revealed that PSK helped to inhibit ROS burst and to promote cell viability when the PEMs were cultured in liquid medium. To investigate the potential role of PSK in this process, we collected PEM cultures at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 days in liquid medium with or without PSK treatment for RNA sequencing (RNA-seq).

Fig. 1
figure 1

PSK inhibits PEM browning during suspension culture in the recalcitrant genotype of C. lanceolata. C. lanceolata PEMs of the recalcitrant genotype 4098–5 were cultured in liquid medium with or without exogenous PSK a The H2O2 accumulation and cell viability of PEM cultures were examined via DAB staining b and Evans blue staining c

Full size image

Comparative time-series transcriptome profiling

To examine the potential role of PSK in C. lanceolata PEM suspension cultures, we generated two sets of time-series RNA-seq data from 1 to 12 days with or without PSK treatment. A total of 181.6 Gb clean data was obtained with RNA-seq data of each sample ranging from 5.8 to 7.4 Gb (Table S1). By de novo transcript assembly, we obtained a total of 208,714 transcripts and 99,295 unigenes with average lengths of 1,197 bp and 957 bp, respectively (Table S2). Assembly completeness assessment using Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) showed that complete BUSCOs accounted for 84.44% and 70.97%, respectively (Table S3).

Among these 99,295 unigenes, 43.79% (43, 481 unigenes) were expressed in at least one stage across all time points in the PSK treatment and nontreatment groups. We identified differentially expressed unigenes via one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests with a false discovery rate [FDR] less than 0.05, leading to 11,877 unigenes. The hierarchical clustering of these differentially expressed unigenes showed that PEMs underwent extensive transcriptional changes in the liquid medium without PSK, while most of these unigenes maintained a stable expression pattern in the PSK treatment (Fig. 2a). Then, we used the K-means clustering algorithm to obtain four clusters based on the gene expression profiles under control conditions (Fig. 2b). For each cluster, we extracted and examined gene expression patterns in the PSK treatment and performed a pairwise comparison between the PSK treatment and nontreatment control at each time point. Consistent with the hierarchical clustering results, the pairwise comparison showed that most unigenes changed dramatically at the transcriptional level in the nontreatment control but remained relatively stable in the PSK treatment. In particular, 24% (2,890, Cluster I) and 34% (4,046, Cluster II) of unigenes were first significantly upregulated and then significantly downregulated and peaked at Days 3 and 6, respectively, under control conditions. In contrast, expression levels of unigenes in these two clusters were slightly decreased and remained stable in general in the PSK treatment.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Transcriptional comparison of C. lanceolata PEM cultures between the PSK treatment and nontreatment control. Differentially expressed unigenes were hierarchically clustered using the expression values a K-means clustering analysis classified these differentially expressed unigenes into four clusters according to their expression profiles under control conditions b A paired t test was performed at each time point between the PSK treatment and nontreatment control

Full size image

Redox fluctuation during PEM suspension culture

To further explore the potential biological mechanisms underlying these clusters, we performed comparative functional enrichment analysis (Fig. 3). Both Gene Ontology (GO) [32] and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) [33] enrichment analyses showed that Clusters I and II were enriched in cell growth- and proliferation-related terms such as ribosome biogenesis (GO:0042254, ko03008) and protein processing in the endoplasmic reticulum (ko04141). Meanwhile, Cluster II was also enriched in energy metabolism-related terms, such as ATP synthesis coupled proton transport (GO:0015986), the TCA cycle (ko00020) and oxidative phosphorylation (ko00190). These results indicated that PEMs cultured in liquid medium led to enhanced cellular respiration under control conditions but not under the PSK treatment.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Comparison of the functional enrichment of four clusters with distinct expression patterns. GO a and KEGG b functional enrichment analyses were performed and compared across four unigene clusters with distinct expression patterns

Full size image

Normally, the enhancement of respiration leads to the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [34]. ROS burst is directly proportional to browning [35]. Thus, we first examined the expression of genes encoding enzymes that participate in browning, including polyphenol oxidases (PPOs, EC: 1.10.3.1), phospholipase D (PLD, EC: 3.1.4.4) and lipoxygenase (LOX, EC: 1.13.11.12). We found that all these genes were either highly expressed on Days 3/6 and then decreased or expressed at low levels at first and then increased to the peak level on Day 12 under control conditions but remained relatively stable in the PSK treatment (Fig. 4a), consistent with the observed phenotypes of PEM browning occurring in the nontreatment control but not in the PSK treatment (Fig. 1a). Then, we further examined the expression of genes functioning in dynamic ROS regulation processes, including ROS production and scavenging. Interestingly, we found that either ROS-producing (Fig. 4b) or ROS-scavenging (Fig. 4c) enzymes showed a similar expression pattern to browning-related enzymes. These results indicated a disequilibrium of redox homeostasis in PEM cultures, more likely indicating a shif to a more oxidizing environment, which might lead to PEM browning in the liquid medium without PSK.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Transcriptional comparisons of redox homeostasis-related enzymes. The expression heatmap for the main enzymes that participate in enzymatic browning a ROS production b and ROS scavenging c PPO, polyphenol oxidase; PLD, phospholipase D; LOX, lipoxygenase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; PAO, polyamine oxidase; RBOH, respiratory burst oxidase homologue; CAT, catalase; GPX, glutathione peroxidase; APX, ascorbate peroxidase; GR, glutathione reductase; MDAR, monodehydroascorbate reductase

Full size image

A potential dual effect of PSK on PRXs

During expression analyses of redox homeostasis-related genes, we found that Class III peroxidases (PRXs, E1.11.1.7) showed two opposite expression patterns, i.e., one was extremely highly expressed on Days 3/6 or Day 12 in the nontreatment control but maintained stable expression in the PSK treatment, and the other was highly expressed on Days 3/6 in the PSK treatment but expressed at low levels in the nontreatment control (Fig. 5a, b). Since PRXs can act both as ROS scavengers in the peroxidatic cycle and ROS producers in the oxidative and hydroxylic cycles [36], we further examined the phylogenetic classification of these C. lanceolata PRX (ClPRX) genes by reconstructing an evolutionary tree together with Arabidopsis homologues (AtPRXs). A total of 72 unigenes were annotated as PRX-coding genes in C. lanceolata, of which 64% (46 unigenes) were expressed across the PSK treatment and the nontreatment control. We further predicted protein coding sequences from these expressed PRX-coding unigenes and identified a total of 40 ClPRX preteins by performing a BLASTP search with a best hit to AtPRX in the TAIR database.

Fig. 5
figure 5

A potential dual effect of PSK on the regulation of ClPRX transcription. Heatmaps of absolute a and relative b gene expression of ClPRXs in C. lanceolata PEM cultures with or without PSK treatment. The phylogenetic tree was reconstructed based on the multialignment of ClPRX and AtPRX proteins using the ML method with a bootstrap value of 1,000 c Comparisons of gene expression across suspension cultures are shown for four selected unigenes

Full size image

Phylogenetic analysis showed that ClPRXs can be classified into five groups together with AtPRXs (Fig. 5c), consistent with the phylogenetic results in Arabidopsis [37]. Cluster-30736.42844 had the overall highest expression level across all these ClPRXs (Fig. 5a) and was further transcriptionally activated on Day 6 in the PSK treatment (Fig. 5b). The closest homologue of Cluster-30736.42844 in Arabidopsis was AtPRX52 (Fig. 5c), functioning in lignification, which is considered an ROS consumption process via substrate oxidation [38, 39]. Another unigene showing a similar expression pattern to Cluster-30736.42844 but with a lower absolute expression level was Cluster-30736.44480, which was the closest homologue to AtPRX31/63 with no certain biological function. Interestingly, two unigenes (Cluster-30736.41200 and Cluster-30736.42200) shared the same expression pattern, that is, they were specifically transcriptionally activated on Day 3 in the nontreatment control and were clustered together in the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 5). Both of them had the best BLASTP hit to AtPRX3, which was reported to be involved in the production of ROS under potassium deprivation in roots [40]. Overall, these results suggest a potential dual role of PSK in the transcriptional regulation of PRXs functioning in ROS production and scavenging, that maintains a redox homeostasis in C. lanceolata PEM cultures and prevents PEM browning.

PSK safeguarded the success of PEM suspension culture

To further confirm the success of C. lanceolata PEM suspension culture, we examined the H2O2 and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents of PEM cultures (Fig. 6a, b). We found that the content of H2O2 was increased in the suspension culture under both conditions but was always lower in the PSK treatment than in the nontreatment control, although not all comparisons showed a significant difference (Fig. 6a). However, an obvious H2O2 burst was observed as soon as PEMs were transferred into the liquid medium in the nontreatment control, whereas the H2O2 content even slightly decreased in the PSK treatment compared with the initial PEMs. In addition, the measurement of MDA content revealed a similar pattern, with much more obvious differences (Fig. 6b). Then, we collected PEM cultures after one cultivation cycle of suspension culture and subcultured them on solid medium. The results showed that PEMs in the PSK treatment continued to grow, whereas browning PEMs tended to die in the nontreatment control (Fig. 6c). Light microscopy showed that a typical PEM structure was maintained in PEMs from PSK treatment, but only broken and incomplete PEMs were found in the nontreatment control (Fig. 6c). Furthermore, Evans blue and Trypan blue staining indicated much more cell viability in PEMs in the PSK treatment than in the nontreatment control (Fig. 6d). Overall, we concluded that PSK helped to establish a PEM suspension culture system in C. lanceolata by maintaining ROS homeostasis, inhibiting PEM browning and promoting cell viability.

Fig. 6
figure 6

PSK contributes to the establishment of a PEM suspension culture system in C. lanceolata. The H2O2 a and MDA b contents of PEMs were quantified during suspension culture under both conditions. A t test was performed to examine the difference between the PSK treatment and the nontreatment control at each time point. PEMs were subcultured on solid medium after suspension culture c PEMs on solid medium were stained using Evans blue stain and Trypan blue stain d

Full size image

Discussion

PSK inhibits C. lanceolata PEM browning during suspension culture

In our research, the major obstacle in the establishment of an effective PEM suspension culture system in recalcitrant C. lanceolata genotype 4098–5 was lethal browning after the PEMs were transferred from solid to liquid medium (Fig. 1). Browning requires the joint participation of PPOs and their substrates phenolic compounds, as well as oxygen [17]. Excessive accumulation of ROS induces cell membrane lipid peroxidation and causes structural integrity loss of the cell membrane, leading to cellular decompartmentalization and finally enzymatic browning [35]. Consistent with this, the H2O2 content increased as soon as PEMs were transferred from solid to liquid medium under control conditions (Figs. 1b and 6a), and the degree of PEM browning increased over the course of the suspension culture (Fig. 1a). In contrast, exogenous application of PSK obviously alleviated the ROS burst, especially in the early stages of the suspension culture (Figs. 1b and 6a), and effectively inhibited PEM browning (Fig. 1a). In particular, PEMs could still grow on the solid medium after a cycle of suspension culture in the PSK treatment, while PEMs in the nontreatment control experienced severe browning and ultimately death (Fig. 6). Thus, exogenous application of PSK effectively inhibits PEM browning and contributes to the establishment of a suspension culture system in this recalcitrant C. lanceolata genotype.

PSK inhibits PEM browning via the maintenance of redox homeostasis

Compared to the nontreatment control, in suspension PEM cultures with additional exogenous PSK, the H2O2 content was decreased, and browning was inhibited. To explore the underlying transcription regulation mechanisms, we performed comparative time-series transcriptome analyses and found that extensive transcriptional changes occurred as soon as PEMs were transferred from solid to liquid medium under control conditions (Fig. 2). In contrast, exogenous application of PSK facilitated a smooth transition from solid culture to liquid suspension culture at least at the transcriptional level (Fig. 2). GO and KEGG enrichment analyses showed that an enhanced aerobic respiration occurred when PEMs were cultured in liquid suspension, especially at the early stage, in the nontreatment control but not in the PSK treatment (Fig. 3). The enhancement of respiration in the nontreatment control is supposed to induce ROS bursts and browning [34, 35], which is consistent with observations in the practical situations of our study (Fig. 1). Furthermore, we examined the transcriptional responses of key enzymes in ROS production and scavenging to suspension culture and found that most of these genes presented dramatic fluctuations in the nontreatment control but maintained a relatively stable expression pattern in the PSK treatment (Fig. 4).

Recent studies have shown that the PSK receptor RSKR1 can enhance plant defence and growth via phosphorylation of a glutamine synthetase in tomato, which is associated with oxidation–reduction processes [28]. In peach fruit, exogenous application of PSK contributed to a decrease in ROS content and LOX activity, thus ameliorating chilling injury [30]. Furthermore, exogenous PSK in banana helps to alleviate chilling injury by increasing polyamine, proline, and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), all of which play a role in mitigating ROS in plants [29, 41,42,43]. In addition, exogenous PSK application decreased H2O2 and MDA accumulation, accompanied by higher expression of SOD, CAT, APX, and GR and lower expression of PLD and LOX, thus delaying broccoli floret yellowing during cold storage [44]. Consistent with the roles of PSK in the regulation of redox homeostasis, we found that PSK decreased the H2O2 and MDA content and inhibited browning in PEM cultures during suspension culture. However, exogenous PSK contributed to redox homeostasis via the maintenance of the stability of ROS metabolism, rather than some particular ROS-producing or ROS-scavenging enzymes in C. lanceolata PEM culutres (Fig. 4). In other words, PSK treatment decreased the transcriptional responses of most ROS-producing and ROS-scavenging enzymes to the transition from solid to liquid medium, maintaining a relatively stable redox environment.

Conclusions

In summary, we established a PEM suspension culture system in a recalcitrant C. lanceolata genotype, in which H2O2 and MDA accumulation and successive PEM browning were repressed by exogenous application of PSK. We performed comparative time-series transcriptome analysis and found that exogenous PSK contributed to the smooth transition of PEM cultures from solid to liquid medium at least at the transcriptional level. Further gene expression profiling showed that PSK treatment decreased the transcriptional fluctuations of most ROS metabolism-related enzymes, thus maintaining redox homeostasis when PEMs were cultured in liquid suspension, especially in the early stage. In addition, we also found that PSK might have a dual effect on the transcriptional regulation of PRXs, i.e., repressing ROS-producing PRXs and activating ROS-scavenging PRXs. These results provide new insights into the biological roles of PSK in repressing browning during plant cell suspension culture and a valuable tool for future establishment of a large-scale suspension culture system of conifer species without genotype limitation.

Methods

Plant materials

Immature cones were collected from a clonal tree of C. lanceolata genotype 4098 growing at the Yangkou forest station of the Chinese fir National Germplasm Bank (Fujian, China) in 2017. Renhua Zheng and Jisen Shi were responsible for the formal identification of the samples. Living plantlets are preserve in the Chinese fir National Germplasm Bank (Fujian, China) with a genotype number of ‘4098’. PEMs were induced from these cones and subcultured in the State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding (Nanjing, China). In this study, approximately 2 g of PEMs on the 21st day of growth on solid medium was subcultured in liquid medium at an agitation speed of 85 rpm for suspension culture in 50 mL Erlenmeyer flasks. The liquid suspension medium consisted of DCR salts, 0.5 mg/L 2,4-D, 0.2 mg/L 6-BA, 10 mg/L VC, 450 g/L glutamine, 500 mg/L CH, 2 g/L inosite and 30 g/L maltose. The treatment concentration of PSK was 0.2 mg/L. RNA samples from mixed PEM cultures at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 days in liquid medium with and without of PSK were prepared for RNA-seq with three biological replicates per sample.

Transcriptome analysis

The quantity and quality of RNA was assessed using the RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit of the Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, USA), and approximately 1.5 μg RNA per sample was used as the input material for the RNA sample preparations. Sequencing libraries were generated and sequenced by Illumina NovaSeq 6000, generating the end reading of 150 bp pairing. After quality control, read filtering and base correction for the raw read data, the clean read data were used to de novo assemble transcripts using Trinity version 2.6.6 [45]. Then, Corset version 4.6 was used to aggregate redundant transcripts, which were used as representative gene models in the following differential expression analysis [46]. We used the clean read data to quantify representative gene model expression using Kallisto version 0.46.1 [47]. Then, we used the R package edgeR version 3.34.1 to perform differential expression analysis using read count data [48]. Specifically, we performed one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)-like testing using the glmQLFTest function in edgeR to identify differentially expressed genes across all samples with an FDR cut-off of 0.05. Next, we used the R package clusterProfiler version 4.0.5 to perform GO and KEGG enrichment analyses [49] and pheatmap version 1.0.12 to draw gene expression heatmaps.

PRX gene family identification

All CDS and protein sequences of Class III PRXs in Arabidopsis were downloaded from The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR, www.arabidopsis.org) [50]. Then, these AtPRX nucleic acid sequences were used in a BLASTN search against the C. lanceolata redundant transcript database, resulting in ClPRX candidates with E-values less than 0.0001 [51]. After that, each ClPRX candidate was submitted to NCBI ORFfinder (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/orffinder/) for predicting open reading frames (ORFs) and to NCBI CDD version 3.20 for predicting conserved domain [52]. The predicted protein sequence was further submitted to TAIR to run a BLASTP search and was counted as a ClPRX protein if the best BLASTP hit was an AtPRX protein. Finally, all PRX protein sequences were aligned using Clustal Omega version 1.2.4 [53]. The phylogenetic tree was reconstructed using RAxML version 8.2.11 and visualized using iTOL version 6.7.4 [54, 55].

ROS staining and measurement

Histochemical staining of H2O2 was performed using DAB solution (Sigma‒Aldrich) at a working concentration of 1 mg/ml. C. lanceolata PEMs were infiltrated with DAB solution and incubated in the dark for 1.5 h at room temperature. The stained PEMs were removed and made into slides, which were observed and photographed using an inverted microscope (Leica, DMI4000) and a confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, LSM 800). The H2O2 content was determined using an H2O2 assay kit (Jiancheng, China), and the absorbance was measured at 415 nm using an enzyme labelling instrument with three biological replicates. The MDA content was determined using an MDA assay kit (Jiancheng, China), and the absorbance was measured at 532 nm using an enzyme labelling instrument with three biological replicates.

Evans blue and trypan blue staining

C. lanceolata PEMs were extracted from liquid suspension medium and placed on slides, stained with Evans blue stain (0.5%) or Trypan blue stain (0.04%) for 45 s, and observed and photographed using a confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, LSM 800).

Availability of data and materials

Raw reads have been deposited under National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) BioProject accession number PRJNA970264.

References

  1. Zimmerman JL. Somatic embryogenesis: a model for early development in higher plants. Plant Cell. 1993;5(10):1411–23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Steward FC, Mapes MO, Smith J. Growth and organized development of cultured cells I. growth and division of freely suspended cells. Am J Bot. 1958;45:693–703.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Loyola-Vargas VM, Ochoa-Alejo N. Somatic Embryogenesis: Fundamental Aspects and Applications. Switzerland: Springer; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ramirez-Mosqueda MA: Overview of Somatic Embryogenesis. In: Somatic Embryogenesis. Edited by Ramírez-Mosqueda MA. New York, NY: Humana; 2022.

  5. von Arnold S, Sabala I, Bozhkov P, Dyachok J, Filonova L. Developmental pathways of somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2002;69:233–49.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang M, Wang A, Qin M, Qin X, Yang S, Su S, Sun Y, Zhang L. Direct and indirect somatic embryogenesis induction in camellia oleifera abel. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12: 644389.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Woo HA, Ku SS, Jie EY, Kim H, Kim HS, Cho HS, Jeong WJ, Park SU, Min SR, Kim SW. Efficient plant regeneration from embryogenic cell suspension cultures of Euonymus alatus. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):15120.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Abohatem MA, Bakil Y, Baaziz M. Plant regeneration from somatic embryogenic suspension cultures of date palm. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1637:203–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kong EYY, Biddle J, Kalaipandian S, Adkins SW. Coconut callus initiation for cell suspension culture. Plants (Basel). 2023;12(4):968.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dutt M, Grosser JW. An embryogenic suspension cell culture system for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of citrus. Plant Cell Rep. 2010;29(11):1251–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li M, Wang D, Long X, Hao Z, Lu Y, Zhou Y, Peng Y, Cheng T, Shi J, Chen J. Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of embryogenic callus in a liriodendron hybrid (L. Chinense x L. Tulipifera). Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:802128.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ribas AF, Dechamp E, Champion A, Bertrand B, Combes MC, Verdeil JL, Lapeyre F, Lashermes P, Etienne H. Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of Coffea arabica (L.) is greatly enhanced by using established embryogenic callus cultures. BMC Plant Biol. 2011;11:92.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu R, Sun Y, Wu B, Duan H, Zheng H, Hu D, Lin H, Tong Z, Xu J, Li Y. Somatic embryogenesis of immature cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook Zygotic Embryos. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):56.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou X, Zheng R, Liu G, Xu Y, Zhou Y, Laux T, Zhen Y, Harding SA, Shi J, Chen J. Desiccation treatment and endogenous IAA levels are key factors influencing high frequency somatic embryogenesis in cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:2054.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Mustafa NR, de Winter W, van Iren F, Verpoorte R. Initiation, growth and cryopreservation of plant cell suspension cultures. Nat Protoc. 2011;6(6):715–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Li Y, Meng T, Wang Y, Zhang X. Study on enzymatic browning in suspension cultures of licorice cells. Biotechnol Biotec Eq. 2016;30(2):277–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gupta SD, Conger BV. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from suspension cultures of switchgrass. Crop Sci. 1999;39(1):243–7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dong YS, Fu CH, Su P, Xu XP, Yuan J, Wang S, Zhang M, Zhao CF, Yu LJ. Mechanisms and effective control of physiological browning phenomena in plant cell cultures. Physiol Plant. 2016;156(1):13–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thomas TD. The role of activated charcoal in plant tissue culture. Biotechnol Adv. 2008;26(6):618–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Khosoushahi AY, Naderi-Manesh H, Omidi Y. Effects of Camellia sinensis L. extract and cysteine on browning, growth and paclitaxel production of subcultured Taxus brevifolia L. calli. J Med Plant Res. 2011;5:6210–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sauter M. Phytosulfokine peptide signalling. J Exp Bot. 2015;66(17):5161–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Matsubayashi Y, Sakagami Y. Phytosulfokine, sulfated peptides that induce the proliferation of single mesophyll cells of Asparagus officinalis L. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(15):7623–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Matsubayashi Y, Takagi L, Sakagami Y. Phytosulfokine-alpha, a sulfated pentapeptide, stimulates the proliferation of rice cells by means of specific high- and low-affinity binding sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(24):13357–62.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Komori R, Amano Y, Ogawa-Ohnishi M, Matsubayashi Y. Identification of tyrosylprotein sulfotransferase in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(35):15067–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Srivastava R, Liu JX, Howell SH. Proteolytic processing of a precursor protein for a growth-promoting peptide by a subtilisin serine protease in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2008;56(2):219–27.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Matsubayashi Y, Ogawa M, Morita A, Sakagami Y. An LRR receptor kinase involved in perception of a peptide plant hormone, phytosulfokine. Science. 2002;296(5572):1470–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang H, Hu Z, Lei C, Zheng C, Wang J, Shao S, Li X, Xia X, Cai X, Zhou J, et al. A plant phytosulfokine peptide initiates auxin-dependent immunity through cytosolic Ca(2+) signaling in tomato. Plant Cell. 2018;30(3):652–67.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Ding S, Lv J, Hu Z, Wang J, Wang P, Yu J, Foyer CH, Shi K. Phytosulfokine peptide optimizes plant growth and defense via glutamine synthetase GS2 phosphorylation in tomato. EMBO J. 2023;42(6): e111858.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang D, Huang H, Jiang Y, Duan X, Lin X, Soleimani Aghdam M, Luo Z. Exogenous phytosulfokine alpha (PSKalpha) alleviates chilling injury of banana by modulating metabolisms of nitric oxide, polyamine, proline, and gamma-aminobutyric acid. Food Chem. 2022;380: 132179.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jiao C. PpCBF6 is involved in phytosulfokine alpha-retarded chilling injury by suppressing the expression of PpLOX5 in peach fruit. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13: 874338.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Hao Z, Wu H, Zheng R, Li R, Zhu Z, Chen Y, Lu Y, Cheng T, Shi J, Chen J. The plant peptide hormone phytosulfokine promotes somatic embryogenesis by maintaining redox homeostasis in Cunninghamia lanceolata. Plant J. 2023;113(4):716–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gene Ontology C, Aleksander SA, Balhoff J, Carbon S, Cherry JM, Drabkin HJ, Ebert D, Feuermann M, Gaudet P, Harris NL, et al. The Gene Ontology knowledgebase in 2023. Genetics. 2023;224(1):iyad031.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Ishiguro-Watanabe M. KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51(D1):D587–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nadarajah KK. ROS homeostasis in abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(15):5208.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang W, Pan Y, Jiang Y, Zhang Z. Advances in control technologies and mechanisms to treat peel browning in postharvest fruit. Sci Hortic-Amsterdam. 2023;311: 111798.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Jovanović SV, Kukavica B, Vidović M, Morina F, Menckhoff L: Class III Peroxidases: Functions, Localization and Redox Regulation of Isoenzymes. In: Antioxidants and Antioxidant Enzymes in Higher Plants. Edited by Gupta D, Palma J, Corpas F: Springer, Cham; 2018.

  37. Tognolli M, Penel C, Greppin H, Simon P. Analysis and expression of the class III peroxidase large gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene. 2002;288(1–2):129–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fernandez-Perez F, Pomar F, Pedreno MA, Novo-Uzal E. The suppression of AtPrx52 affects fibers but not xylem lignification in Arabidopsis by altering the proportion of syringyl units. Physiol Plant. 2015;154(3):395–406.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Shigeto J, Tsutsumi Y. Diverse functions and reactions of class III peroxidases. New Phytol. 2016;209(4):1395–402.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kim MJ, Ciani S, Schachtman DP. A peroxidase contributes to ROS production during Arabidopsis root response to potassium deficiency. Mol Plant. 2010;3(2):420–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rehman AU, Bashir F, Ayaydin F, Kota Z, Pali T, Vass I. Proline is a quencher of singlet oxygen and superoxide both in in vitro systems and isolated thylakoids. Physiol Plant. 2021;172(1):7–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Saha J, Brauer EK, Sengupta A, Popescu SC, Gupta K, Gupta B. Polyamines as redox homeostasis regulators during salt stress in plants. Front Environ Sci. 2015;3:21.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ansari MI, Jalil SU, Ansari SA, Hasanuzzaman M. GABA shunt: a key-player in mitigation of ROS during stress. Plant Growth Regul. 2021;94(2):131–49.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Aghdam MS, Flores FB. Employing phytosulfokine alpha (PSKalpha) for delaying broccoli florets yellowing during cold storage. Food Chem. 2021;355: 129626.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, Adiconis X, Fan L, Raychowdhury R, Zeng QD, et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(7):644-U130.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Davidson NM, Oshlack A. Corset: enabling differential gene expression analysis for de novo assembled transcriptomes. Genome Biol. 2014;15(7):410.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Bray NL, Pimentel H, Melsted P, Pachter L. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34(5):525–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(1):139–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012;16(5):284–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Lamesch P, Berardini TZ, Li D, Swarbreck D, Wilks C, Sasidharan R, Muller R, Dreher K, Alexander DL, Garcia-Hernandez M, et al. The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): improved gene annotation and new tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(Database issue):D1202-1210.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215(3):403–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lu S, Wang J, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, Geer RC, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Hurwitz DI, Marchler GH, Song JS, et al. CDD/SPARCLE: the conserved domain database in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(D1):D265–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, Lopez R, McWilliam H, Remmert M, Soding J, et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:539.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(W1):W293–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(9):1312–3.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Lu Tong and Ya Chen for helping determine the H2O2 and MDA contents in C. lanceolata PEM cultures and Junjie Zhu for technical assistance in PEM culture.

Funding

This research was supported by the Seed Industry Innovation and Industrialization Engineering Project of Fujian Province (ZYCX-LY-202101), the Fujian Provincial Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund (2020R1009003), the Nature Science Foundation of China (32071784), the Youth Foundation of the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20210614), the Higher School in Jiangsu Province College Students' Practice Innovation Training Programs (202110298005Z) and Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Zhaodong Hao and Jinyu Shi contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China

    Zhaodong Hao, Jinyu Shi, Hua Wu, Yiqing Yan, Kaifei Xing, Jisen Shi & Jinhui Chen

  2. Key Laboratory of Forest Genetics and Biotechnology of Ministry of Education, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China

    Zhaodong Hao, Jinyu Shi, Hua Wu, Yiqing Yan, Kaifei Xing, Jisen Shi & Jinhui Chen

  3. Fujian Academy of Forestry, Fuzhou, 350012, Fujian, China

    Renhua Zheng

Authors
  1. Zhaodong Hao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jinyu Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hua Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yiqing Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kaifei Xing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Renhua Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jisen Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jinhui Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.H.C. and Z.D.H. led the project and designed the experiments. R.H.Z. and J.S.S. collected cones for PEM induction. J.Y.S., H.W., and Y.Q.Y. established the suspension culture system. J.Y.S., Y.Q.Y., and K.F.X. collected RNA-seq samples and performed PEM staining. Z.D.H. and J.Y.S. performed the transcriptome analysis. Z.D.H. and J.Y.S. wrote and edited most of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinhui Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Permission has been obtained for collecting cones of C. lanceolata at the Yangkou forest station of the Chinese fir National Germplasm Bank (Fujian, China).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Table S1. Data statistics of RNA-seq data. Table S2. Length distribution of assembled transcripts and unigenes. Table S3. BUSCO assessment for transcript assembly completeness.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hao, Z., Shi, J., Wu, H. et al. Phytosulfokine contributes to suspension culture of Cunninghamia lanceolata through its impact on redox homeostasis. BMC Plant Biol 23, 480 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04496-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04496-1

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us