Skip to main content
Download PDF

Alkaline and acidic soil constraints on iron accumulation by Rice cultivars in relation to several physio-biochemical parameters

BMC Plant Biology volume 23, Article number: 397 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Agricultural production is severely limited by an iron deficiency. Alkaline soils increase iron deficiency in rice crops, consequently leading to nutrient deficiencies in humans. Adding iron to rice enhances both its elemental composition and the nutritional value it offers humans through the food chain. The purpose of the current pot experiment was to investigate the impact of Fe treatment in alkaline (pH 7.5) and acidic (pH 5.5) soils to introduce iron-rich rice. Iron was applied to the plants in the soil in the form of an aqueous solution of FeSO4 with five different concentrations (100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 mM). The results obtained from the current study demonstrated a significant increase in Fe content in Oryza sativa with the application of iron in both alkaline and acidic pH soils. Specifically, Basmati-515, one of the rice cultivars tested, exhibited a notable 13% increase in iron total accumulation per plant and an 11% increase in root-to-shoot ratio in acidic soil. In contrast to Basmati-198, which demonstrated maximum response in alkaline soil, Basmati-515 exhibited notable increases in all parameters, including a 31% increase in dry weight, 16% increase in total chlorophyll content, an 11% increase in CAT (catalase) activity, 7% increase in APX (ascorbate peroxidase) activity, 26% increase in POD (peroxidase) activity, and a remarkable 92% increase in SOD (superoxide dismutase) in acidic soil. In alkaline soil, Basmati-198 exhibited respective decreases of 40% and 39% in MDA and H2O2 content, whereas Basmati-515 demonstrated a more significant decrease of 50% and 67% in MDA and H2O2 in acidic soil. These results emphasize the potential for targeted soil management strategies to improve iron nutrition and address iron deficiency in agricultural systems. By considering soil conditions, it is possible to enhance iron content and promote its availability in alkaline and acidic soils, ultimately contributing to improved crop nutrition and human health.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Rice is the best species for genetic characterization of Iron (Fe) homeostasis and genetic improvement since it is the most adaptable model for cereals and a food crop with economic importance [1]. Two thirds of people are fed by rice, a basic staple diet. In developing nations, it is essential for ensuring food security [2]. In order to reach Zero Hunger, hidden hunger must be tackled as one of the primary difficulties, especially in African, Asian, and Latin American nations where it affects more than two billion people. In fact, almost three million people die each year from nutritional deficiencies, primarily due to a deficiency of vitamins and minerals [3].

Numerous vital activities, including as development, cognition, the immune system, and maintaining antioxidant activity, depend on micronutrients like Zn, Fe, and Se [4]. Fe plays a critical role in the catalytic activities of numerous enzymes, including those involved in the transport of oxygen, the transfer of electrons, oxi-reduction events, collagen manufacture, and the metabolism of vitamin D [5]. Anemia, which is defined as having inadequate red blood cells, accounts for a significant number of cases [6]. Children and adults with chronic IDA (Iron Deficiency Anemia) experience substantial growth and developmental problems, including delayed growth, which results in weariness and lowers physical and mental function [7].

The fourth most prevalent element in the earth’s crust is iron (Fe), and it is crucial for both chemical and biological activities. Recent decades have seen an increase in interest in environmental chemistry and material sciences about the redox reactivity of diverse forms of Fe [8]. Fe is an essential component of many enzymes and proteins in vital processes that support growth and metabolism in plants, and a lack of it is directly linked to a decline in crop production and quality because it is crucial for plant growth, productivity, and quality. Algae and higher plants’ photosynthetic efficiency is significantly influenced by Fe homeostasis [9]. Fe has an impact on the cycling of nitrogen (N) in soils in both oxic and anoxic conditions. The pH of the soil controls how much Fe is used in the conversion of N. Fe oxides frequently stimulate nitrification activity in soil with low pH, where their impact on soil N transformation activities is dependent on soil pH [10].

The importance of iron in rice accumulation is attributed to its role in the synthesis and functioning of proteins and enzymes involved in the transport and storage of nutrients. Iron is particularly important in the synthesis of iron-containing proteins, such as ferredoxins, which are essential for electron transfer reactions in photosynthesis and respiration. These processes are critical for energy production and metabolism within the plant [11, 12]. Iron deficiency in rice occurs due to poor solubility in flooded soils., Alkaline or high pH, excessive phosphorus, and other nutrients [13, 14].

One of the main environmental factors that hinders plant development and yield production globally is alkaline stress. Alkaline or high pH soils negatively affect iron availability. In such conditions, iron tends to form insoluble compounds, making it difficult for rice plants to take up sufficient iron Additionally, alkaline stress caused oxidative damage in plants that was reflected in greater levels of superoxide radical (O2•), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), methylglyoxal (MG), and malondialdehyde (MDA) [15]. On alkaline soils, plants may exhibit iron deficiency chlorosis (IDC), which inhibits development and yield [16]. Alkaline (high pH) soils may also inhibit the absorption of other metal micronutrients such as Mn and Zn [17]. The concentration of carbonate (CO32−) and bicarbonate (HCO3) increases with a rise in the pH of the growth medium, while the solubility of iron decreases as a result of H+ being consumed by HCO3 [18]. Numerous research offer specific solutions to address this issue and improve the micronutrient content in crops [19, 20].

More than 50% of the world’s population is fed on rice (O. sativa L.). One of the most essential staple crops is rice, but polished rice has a low quantity of important micronutrients, various strategies such as biofortification are useful to cope with this problem and increase the concentration of micronutrients in crops [21, 22]. As a result, the major purpose of current research work is to enhance the content of iron in four O. sativa “cultivars: Basmati-198, Basmati-515, PK-386, and KSK-133”. It was also determined how different iron treatments alter morphological, physiological, antioxidant defense systems, and iron absorption. For this purpose, a study was directed to investigate the response of O. sativa to various concentrations of FeSO4 at two pH levels (alkaline and acidic), as well the suitable Fe concentration and pH for normal rice growth and development in iron deficient soil.

Materials and methods

Experimental plan

Seeds of rice (Oryza sativa L.) were received from the Rice Research Institute, KSK, and the rice varieties used in the present research work were “Basmati-198, Basmati-515, PK-386, and KSK-133”. Two Basmati varieties were selected in present research work According to our earlier research, the iron concentrations of Basmati-515 and Basmati-198, are 22.0 and 14.1 ppm, respectively, whereas PK-386 has 19.0 ppm [23]. Seeds of four rice cultivars surface sterilized by using 0.1% bleaching powder (10 to 20 min), then gently rinsed with deionized water before being planted in plastic pots in a natural environment condition (day temperature: 36 oC and night temperature: 27 oC).

Soil preparation

The garden soil (silt loam) from the field of the Botanical Garden, University of the Punjab, Lahore (31o29’57.78 N latitude and 74o17’58.60 E longitude) was collected. The soil samples were air-dried, and their physico-chemical properties are presented (Table 1).

Table 1 The physico-chemical properties of soil samples
Full size table

Throughout the experiment, the pH of the soil for each treatment used in this study was adjusted to 5.5 for acidic soil and 7.5 for alkaline soil, respectively. In this experiment, a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with six replications was used, and iron sulfate (FeSO4) was manually mixed to achieve the five treatment concentrations (100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 mM) along with the control. The control plants were left untreated, without the addition of any specific treatments.

Morphological parameters

The plants were harvested on July 16, 2022, after 25 days of treatment, for the different morphological and biochemical parameters. To eliminate dirt and waste, the plants from each treatment were first washed with tap water and then with distilled water. After the plants were harvested, morphological measurements including total plant length, shoot fresh weight, root fresh weight, and total dry weight per plant were recorded in alkaline as well as acidic soil.

Iron accumulation in plant

Samples of Fe-added rice varieties were collected to assess the Fe concentration in their tissues. Whole plants washed with distilled water after harvesting to remove soil, and either after all these plants kept in cold DCB (dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate) solution for 3 h for iron content determination. Samples were heated to 500 °C for 3 h and then dried at 60 °C. By using concentrated HCl to decompose the ashes, iron was then measured using atomic absorption spectrophotometry [24].

Estimation of antioxidant enzyme activities

A leaf of fresh plant material weighing 0.2 g was taken and homogenized in phosphate buffer (5 mL) and liquid nitrogen having a pH of neutral. At 4 °C and 12,000 rpm, the homogenate mixture was centrifuged for 20 min, and then the extracts were stored at -20 °C while the supernatants were discarded.

The antioxidant enzymes CAT [25], APX [26], POD [27], SOD [28], GPX [29] and DPPH [30] were measured at absorbance of 550, 290, 420, 405, 460, 460, and 517 nm respectively.

Estimation of oxidative stress markers

A mixture of 3 mL of sample extract and 1 mL of 0.1% titanium sulphate in 20% (v/v) H2SO4 was centrifuged at 6000 g for 15 min to determine the H2O2 content of plant tissues. The yellow colour intensity was measured at 410 nm [31]. According to [32], the quantity of MDA was determined.

Results

Effect of Fe on morphology of O. sativa cultivars in soil (pH 7.5 and pH 5.5)

After 25 days of treatment, plants of all O. sativa cultivars planted in high doses of Fe amended soils displayed a better plant growth with higher height and weight. Compared to control plants, O. sativa cultivars exhibited different growth trends at varying FeSO4 concentrations. In Fig. 1 (A, B), displayed the various morphological characteristics of the O. sativa cultivars. Findings of the study showed that plant height, root fresh weight, shoot fresh weight, and total dry weight per plant increased by increasing Fe concentrations (100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 mM) than those of control plants. Results from the current study also indicated that at all Fe levels, acidic soil (pH 5.5) produced more significant effects from Fe treatment than alkaline soil with a pH of 7.5. At 500 mM Fe treatments, the height of Basmati-198 and Basmati-515 increased in comparison to control plants by 47% and 45%, respectively (Fig. 1A) in soil having pH alkaline (pH 7.5). Exogenous Fe supply in acidic soil dramatically increased plants height as compared to plants grown in alkaline soil. Basmati-515 in acidic soil showed maximum plant height results that were 63% higher than the control and Basmati-198 in alkaline soil (Fig. 1B). In alkaline soil, Basmati-198 exhibited a substantial increase in root, shoot fresh weight, and dry weight, with respective increments of 94%, 71%, and 491% compared to untreated plants. Additionally, when compared to Basmati-198, Basmati-515 displayed a 285% and 6% increase in root and shoot fresh weight, respectively, and a remarkable 31% increase in total dry weight in acidic soil. These findings underscore the contrasting growth responses between the two cultivars, indicating the superior performance of Basmati-515 in terms of root and shoot fresh weight and total dry weight. In control plants, total dry weight was significantly lower as compared to Fe-treated plants (Fig. 1C- H).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effect of Fe (0, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 mM) on selected O. sativa cultivars under alkaline and acidic pH. Plant height (A, B), root fresh weight (C, D), shoot fresh weight (E, F), and total dry weight per plant (G, H). According to DMRT, bars with distinct alphabet letters are substantially (p < 0.05) different from one another. All data in the graph are the averages of six replicates (n = 6)

Full size image

Effect of Fe on photosynthetic parameters of O. sativa cultivars in soil (pH 7.5 and pH 5.5)

The chlorophyll and carotenoids analysis revealed that application of FeSO4 enhanced chlorophyll and carotenoids content in O. sativa. The results regarding chlorophyll and carotenoids (chl-a, chl-b, and total chlorophyll content) in alkaline and acidic soil under FeSO4 treatment are presented in Fig. 2. Chlorophyll-a increased by 85 and 65% in alkaline and acidic soils, respectively, in O. sativa cultivar (Basmati-198) in contrast to control. While the highest chl-a was observed in acidic soil, it was observed in Basmati-515 with an average value of 2.8 mg kg− 1 FW at the highest concentration 500 mM in comparison to the control with a value of 1.8 mg kg− 1 FW (Fig. 2A, B). The chl-b content was significantly increased with the same pattern as in chl-a, but in comparison, the chl-a content was higher at each concentration in all cultivars (Figure C, D). Total chlorophyll content was strongly correlated with chl-a and chl-b content. The results regarding this showed that total chlorophyll content was significantly high in Basmati-515, with values of 3.28 and 4.2 mg kg− 1 FW in alkaline and acidic soils, respectively. In contrast to Basmati-198, which exhibited maximum results in alkaline soil, Basmati-515 demonstrated a significant 16% increase in total chlorophyll content specifically in acidic soil (Figure E, F). We also discovered that raising the concentrations of FeSO4 in the soil caused a substantial (p < 0.05) rise in the carotenoids content in alkaline as well as acidic soil (Figure G, H).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect of Fe (0, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 mM) on selected O. sativa cultivars under alkaline and acidic pH. Chlorophyll a (A, B), chlorophyll b (C, D), total chlorophyll content (E, F), and carotenoids (G, H). According to DMRT, bars with distinct alphabet letters are substantially (p < 0.05) different from one another. All data in the graph are the averages of six replicates (n = 6)

Full size image

Effect of Fe on Fe accumulation in shoot, root, total accumulation in plants and root-to-shoot Fe ratio of O. sativa cultivars in soil (pH 7.5 and pH 5.5)

We assessed another important effect of application of FeSO4 on iron accumulation in shoots, roots, and total Fe accumulation in plants, as well as root-to-shoot Fe ratio (Fig. 3). This showed that by increasing the levels of FeSO4 contents, iron accumulation was also increased. As compared to the control plants, iron accumulation increased in all cultivars of O. sativa under the different treatments of Fe. Basmati-198 accumulated the most Fe in alkaline soil, while Basmati-515 accumulated the higher Fe in acidic soil (Fig. 3). The root-to-shoot Fe ratio was also elucidated, with data demonstrating that increasing FeSO4 concentrations resulted in a substantial (p < 0.05) rise in Fe contents of O. sativa cultivars when compared to control (Fig. 3). Iron accumulation in the shoot of the O. sativa cultivar Basmati-198 exhibited a significant increase of 175% in alkaline soil and 117% in acidic soil compared to the respective control conditions (Fig. 3A, B). However, all other parameters, including iron accumulation in the root, total accumulation, and root to shoot ratio, showed a significant positive response towards the highest concentrations of FeSO4 in alkaline and acidic soil (Fig. 3C–H). Upon further analysis, it was found that Basmati-515 exhibited the highest iron accumulation in roots when treated with a high concentration of FeSO4 (500 mM), with an average value of 350 root accumulation P− 1. Notably, Basmati-515 displayed an 18% increase in iron accumulation in acidic soil compared to Basmati-198, which exhibited its highest response in alkaline soil with a value of 287 root accumulation P− 1 (Fig. 3C, D). The O. sativa cultivar Basmati-198 demonstrated the highest total iron accumulation in alkaline soil, while Basmati-515 displayed a more favourable response in acidic soil, reaching a maximum total accumulation of 630 and 555 total accumulation P− 1, respectively at 500 mM. Furthermore, when comparing the two Basmati cultivars, Basmati-515 exhibited a notable 13% increase in total accumulation in acidic soil (Fig. 3E, F). Root to shoot iron accumulation ratio was increased in the same pattern as iron accumulation in leaves, roots, and total accumulation in plants. In terms of root-to-shoot iron accumulation, Basmati-198 exhibited an average value of 2.6 in treated plants in alkaline soil. On the other hand, Basmati-515 displayed a higher average value of 2.9 in acidic soil compared to untreated plants. When comparing the two cultivars, Basmati-515 demonstrated significantly higher results, with an 11% increase in iron accumulation, specifically in acidic soil. This indicates the stronger responsiveness of Basmati-515 to iron treatment in an acidic soil environment. (Fig. 3G, H).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of Fe (0, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 mM) on selected O. sativa cultivars under alkaline and acidic pH. Fe accumulation in shoot (A, B), Fe accumulation in roots (C, D), Fe total accumulation in plant (E, F), and root to shoot Fe ratio (G, H). According to DMRT, bars with distinct alphabet letters are substantially (p < 0.05) different from one another. All data in the graph are the averages of six replicates (n = 6)

Full size image

Effect of Fe on antioxidant enzymatic activity (CAT, APX, POD and SOD) of O. sativa cultivars in soil (pH 7.5 and pH 5.5)

The data related to the antioxidant enzymatic activity (CAT, APX, POD and SOD) of O. sativa cultivars in alkaline (pH 7.5) and acidic soil (pH 5.5) as depicted in Fig. 4. The treatment of different doses of iron has a positive effect on all antioxidant enzymes and by increasing the concentration of FeSO4 significantly high results were obtained in Basmati-515. Maximum antioxidant enzymatic activity was observed in Basmati-198 in alkaline soil, while Basmati-515 showed the maximum antioxidants in acidic soil (Fig. 4A-H). A dose of 500 mM FeSO4 induced a significant increase in CAT activity in alkaline and acidic soils, with values of 0.43 and 0.48 UgP− 1 in Basmati-198 and Basmati-515, respectively. Basmati-198 displayed a notable 69% increase in APX (ascorbate peroxidase) activity in alkaline soil, whereas Basmati-515 exhibited maximum results in acidic soil with a 62% increase in APX activity Fig. 4 (C, D). Basmati-198 demonstrated a significant 55% increase in POD activity in alkaline soil, while Basmati-515 displayed the highest results with a remarkable 65% increase in POD activity specifically in acidic soil (Fig. 4E, F). Basmati-515 showed a maximum SOD value at a level of 400 and 500 mM of FeSO4, with an average value of 0.41 and 0.52 UgP− 1 higher than the control, which has a value of 0.31 UgP− 1. Basmati-515 exhibited a substantial 95% higher increase in acidic soil compared to Basmati-198 (Fig. 4G, H). This highlights the superior responsiveness of Basmati-515 in terms of the observed increase in all antioxidants.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of Fe (0, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 mM) on selected O. sativa cultivars under alkaline and acidic pH. CAT activity (A, B), APX activity (C, D), POD activity (E, F), and SOD activity (G, H). According to DMRT, bars with distinct alphabet letters are substantially (p < 0.05) different from one another. All data in the graph are the averages of six replicates (n = 6)

Full size image

Effect of Fe on antioxidant enzymatic activity (GPX and DPPH) and oxidative markers (MDA and H2O2) of O. sativa cultivars in soil (pH 7.5 and pH 5.5)

Figure 5 depicts another important effect of the application of Fe on the antioxidant enzymes and total antioxidant activity (GPX and DPPH), as well as the reduction in oxidative stress markers (MDA and H2O2) in O. sativa. The results showed that, by increasing the application treatment of FeSO4, GPX and DPPH increased, as in the case of the other antioxidant enzymes in Fig. 4. As compared to the control plants, GPX and DPPH increased in all cultivars of O. sativa under the different treatments of Fe. GPX activity was high in Basmati-198 in alkaline soil, while in acidic soil, Basmati-515 showed a significant high result with a value of 0.07 and 0.085 UgP− 1, respectively (Fig. 5A, B). When compared to the control in acidic soil at 80%, increasing the treatment level of FeSO4 in the soil resulted in a substantial (p < 0.05) rise in the DPPH of O. sativa cultivars (Fig. 5D). In contrast to antioxidants, oxidative stress markers (MDA and H2O2) decreased in all O. sativa cultivars. Basmati-198 exhibited a 50% decrease in MDA (malondialdehyde) content in alkaline soil, while Basmati-515 showed a 40% decrease in MDA in acidic soil. Comparatively, Basmati-515 displayed a 9% greater decrease in MDA in acidic soil compared to Basmati-198. (Fig. 5E, F). In terms of H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide) content, Basmati-198 demonstrated a 39% decrease in alkaline soil, whereas Basmati-515 exhibited a more substantial 67% decrease in acidic soil when compared to untreated plants. Furthermore, in alkaline soil, Basmati-515 displayed a 54% greater decrease in H2O2 content compared to Basmati-198 (Fig. 5G, H). The oxidative stress levels were significantly lower in acidic soil compared to all treated and untreated plants in alkaline soil.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effect of Fe (0, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 mM) on increasing the level of antioxidants (GPX (A, B); DPPH (C, D)) and reducing oxidative stress levels (MDA (E, F); H2O2 (G, H)) in selected Oryza sativa cultivars under alkaline and acidic pH. According to DMRT, bars with distinct alphabet letters are substantially (p < 0.05) different from one another. All data in the graph are the averages of six replicates (n = 6)

Full size image

Effect of Fe on soluble sugar, flavonoids, free amino acids, and carbohydrates of O. sativa cultivars in soil (pH 7.5 and pH 5.5)

The effect of application of FeSO4 on antioxidants non-enzymatic activities (soluble sugar, flavonoids, total free amino acids, and carbohydrates) in O. sativa cultivars is presented in Fig. 6. By increasing the concentration of FeSO4, all non-enzymatic activities were increased, in the case of the antioxidant enzymes as compared to the control (Fig. 4). Soluble sugar was significantly higher in Basmati-198 in alkaline soil, while in acidic soil, Basmati-515 showed a significant high result with a value of 48.8 and 61 mg g− 1 FW, respectively (Fig. 6A, B). The application of increased FeSO4 concentrations in alkaline soil resulted in a statistically significant improvement in flavonoid content in Basmati-198, compared to the control (0.31 µmol g-1 FW). Notably, the highest flavonoid content was observed in Basmati-515, with an average value of 0.5 µmol g-1 FW. These findings, demonstrate the potential of FeSO4 treatment in promoting flavonoid accumulation, with Basmati-515 displaying a better response in terms of flavonoid content (Fig. 6 C, D). Basmati-198 exhibited a substantial 76% increase in free amino acid content, while Basmati-515 displayed an even greater 80% increase. These results indicate the potential of both Basmati-198 and Basmati-515 varieties to enhance the accumulation of free amino acids when treated with FeSO4 (Fig. 6E, F). In a comparison between Basmati-515 and Basmati-198, Basmati-515 exhibited a 7% higher increase in carbohydrate content in acidic soil compared to Basmati-198 in alkaline soil. This suggests that Basmati-515 is more responsive to acidic soil conditions in terms of carbohydrate accumulation (Fig. 6G, H).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Effect of Fe (0, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 mM) on selected O. sativa cultivars under alkaline and acidic pH. Soluble sugar (A, B), flavonoids (C, D), free amino acids (E, F), and total carbohydrates (G, H). According to DMRT, bars with distinct alphabet letters are substantially (p < 0.05) different from one another. All data in the graph are the averages of six replicates (n = 6)

Full size image

Discussion

Iron is required for a variety of metabolic activities in plants. However, its low availability in high pH soils and roots’ reduced ability to acquire it due to iron are two of the most important problems restricting plant development [33]. Micronutrient deficiencies, encompassing calcium, selenium, zinc, and iron, are prevalent among a significant portion of the global population. These deficiencies contribute to malnutrition and pose a substantial burden on public health worldwide [34]. Zinc (Zn) and Iron (Fe) are the two most commonly deficient micronutrients, and they both play vital roles in supporting overall health and well-being [35]. Alkaline soils demonstrate a lack of micronutrients on a global scale [36]. The required levels of micronutrients vary depending on the soil type and pH, necessitating different nutrient considerations for optimal plant growth, and development [37]. pH of the soil is a key component that influences nutrient availability for plants, and soil in arid areas is generally alkaline with a high pH [38]. Despite the widespread recognition of chlorosis occurring in alkaline soils with limited iron (Fe) availability, the antioxidant and physiological responses to iron deficiency remain poorly characterized. There is a lack of comprehensive understanding regarding the specific mechanisms and responses associated with iron deficiency, highlighting the need for further research in this area. Exploring the antioxidant and physiological dynamics under iron-deficient conditions can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of iron deficiency on plant health and provide insights into potential strategies for mitigating the detrimental effects of iron deficiency in alkaline soil environments. In this study, we examined the effects of pH and iron (Fe) supply as two factors on plant responses. Our findings revealed that plant responses to Fe supply were significant in acidic soil pH but not in alkaline pH. The experiment involved five Fe treatments at pH levels of 5.5 and 7.5. O. sativa cultivars grown in soil treated with FeSO4 exhibited enhanced plant growth, improved antioxidant activity, and increased iron accumulation. These results emphasize the importance of considering both soil pH and iron supplementation in optimizing plant performance and nutrient uptake in rice cultivation.

Fe is a crucial micronutrient that plays a significant role in numerous biological processes and is essential for both human health and plant vitality [39]. In alkaline soils with a pH ranging from 7.4 to 8.5, iron minerals tend to have low solubility and slow dissolution kinetics. The uptake of iron by plants growing in alkaline soils is further hindered by elevated bicarbonate levels, a characteristic feature of calcareous soils. As a result, the concentration of available iron becomes inadequate for optimal plant growth, leading to common occurrences of iron deficiency in plants [40]. Fe is necessary for the plants growth, and development. While iron is present in abundance in soil, the fraction of iron that is readily available for plant uptake is often limited. This limited availability of accessible iron in the soil can pose a challenge for plants to meet their iron requirements, potentially leading to iron deficiency [41]. O. sativa cultivars grown in soil treated with FeSO4 (100, 200, 300, 400 and 500 mM), both in acidic and alkaline soil conditions, exhibited notable improvements in various morphological characteristics, including growth, plant height, and fresh and dry mass. Iron can contribute to increased plant height. It is a crucial component of various enzymes involved in protein synthesis. Proteins are essential for cell division and elongation, which contribute to overall plant growth and height. Adequate iron levels ensure the proper functioning of these enzymes, facilitating optimal protein synthesis and promoting plant height development [42]. Our study, which focused on the impact of FeSO4 on plant growth and morphology, is highly relevant to the findings from the previous study regarding the role of iron in plant hormone regulation and cell elongation. The previous study highlighted that iron is involved in the biosynthesis and regulation of plant hormones, specifically auxins. Iron influences the synthesis and distribution of auxins, which, in turn, impacts cell elongation and ultimately contributes to increased plant height [43]. By ensuring sufficient iron availability through FeSO4 treatment, our study demonstrated the positive impact of iron on morphological characteristics in O. sativa cultivars. The increased iron availability stimulated chlorophyll synthesis, enzymatic activity, and hormone regulation, all of which collectively contributed to improved growth, plant height, and biomass accumulation. The lack of comprehensive studies and understanding regarding the uptake and translocation of iron from the soil has hindered the development of rice cultivars. However, previous research has shown that for cultivars such as BARI-2000 and BARD-699, foliar applications of iron treatments led to growth and photosynthetic rate increases of up to 58% and 70%, respectively. Furthermore, Various morpho-physiological parameters, including shoot length, root length, shoot fresh and dry weights, root fresh and dry weights, photosynthetic and transpiration rates, as well as SPAD values, were also observed to increase [44].

Significant decreases in plant height, shoot fresh weight, root dry weight, germination percentages, and photosynthesis (chl a, chl b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids content) were observed in iron-deficient rice cultivars in alkaline as well as acidic soil (Figs. 1 and 2). Previous studies that examined morphological traits under different iron levels and chlorophyll contents have shown that iron deficiency can lead to chloroplast degeneration in plant leaves [45]. Salinity refers to high levels of salt in the soil, which can lead to osmotic stress as the high salt levels disrupt water uptake and inhibit nutrient absorption such as iron. Without sufficient iron, the photosynthetic rate of plants can be reduced, leading to decreased shoot and root growth. Additionally, iron deficiency can affect the functioning of stomata, which regulate gas exchange and transpiration rates. Reduced stomatal conductance can further impact photosynthesis and transpiration, limiting plant growth [46, 47]. Iron deficiency can disrupt electron transport and ATP synthesis, leading to reduced energy availability for plant growth and photosynthetic processes [48]. By increasing the levels of FeSO4 contents, iron accumulation was also increased. As compared to the control plants, iron accumulation increased in all cultivars of O. sativa under the different treatments of Fe (Fig. 3). FeSO4 serves as a source of soluble iron ions (Fe2+) that are readily available for uptake by plant roots. As the concentration of FeSO4 increases, there is a higher concentration gradient of Fe2+ in the soil, which enhances the potential for iron uptake by plant roots, leading to a higher accumulation of iron in the plant tissues [12, 49].

In our current research, we observed significant enhancements in various antioxidants with increased Fe treatment in both alkaline and acidic soil conditions (Fig. 4). These findings highlight the positive impact of FeSO4 on multiple biochemical parameters associated with plant health and stress response Specifically, antioxidants such as catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), and the free radical scavenging capacity measured by the DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) assay exhibited increased activity in response to Fe treatment (Figs. 3 and 4). The positive influence of Fe supplementation on the plant’s antioxidant capacity observed in our research can be related to previous studies that showed the enhancement of antioxidants due to the use of iron oxide nanoparticles [50]. Furthermore, Fe plays a role in regulating the expression of genes involved in antioxidant defense. Fe availability affects the transcription and translation of genes encoding antioxidant enzymes, thereby increasing their production and activity. This ultimately leads to an enhanced antioxidant capacity in Fe-supplemented plants [51]. The reduction in SOD, POD, and CAT activities in O. sativa cultivars under significant Fe deficiency. Additionally, our study clarified that, under conditions of significant iron (Fe) deficiency, the activities of key antioxidant enzymes, reduced O. sativa cultivars reflects the impact of Fe deficiency on the antioxidant defense system and increase in oxidative stress (Fig. 5). Our study is in line with the findings of previous research that investigated the exogenous application of FeSO4 on O. sativa plants and its impact on Cd toxicity, antioxidant potential, plant growth, and photosynthesis. The previous study reported that the application of FeSO4 resulted in decreased Cd toxicity by enhancing the antioxidant potential and decreasing the MDA and H2O2 level [52,53,54].

Furthermore, Fe treatment led to elevated levels of proline, free amino acids, soluble sugars (including reducing and non-reducing sugars), flavonoids, total soluble protein, phenolic compounds, and total carbohydrates (Fig. 6). These biochemical components are involved in various physiological processes, such as osmotic adjustment, stress tolerance, defense mechanisms, and energy metabolism. By establishing a connection between our research and previous studies, it is reported that Fe is known to interact with other components of the antioxidant system, such as non-enzymatic antioxidants like phenolic compounds and flavonoids, further enhancing the antioxidant capacity of the plant [55]. According to our study, increasing the iron concentration level in the soil can lead to an increase in free amino acids and carbohydrates and enhance the uptake of iron by plants. These findings are in agreement with previous studies. Iron levels lead to increased carbohydrate production in plants, strengthen cell walls, and provide building blocks for the synthesis of defense-related compounds [56]. Another study showed that iron is essential for maintaining optimal amino acid metabolism in plants [57, 58]. A significant increase in flavonoid content in O. sativa cultivars was caused by increased FeSO4 concentrations in comparison to the control (0.27 µmol g− 1 FW) in acidic soil at 500 mM (Fig. 6D). In addition to acting as antioxidants, flavonoids also contribute to plant metal tolerance by donating hydrogen atoms. It has been demonstrated that plants are more tolerant of stress when their flavonoids are higher [59].

It was observed in the present study that iron availability in the soil is highly influenced by soil pH. In alkaline soils, iron tends to form insoluble compounds, making it less available for plant uptake. However, Fe treatment enables them to better access and acquire iron in alkaline soil. On the other hand, in acidic soils, iron is generally more soluble and available for plant uptake; therefore, O. sativa cultivars adapted to acidic soil conditions under Fe treatment efficiently take up and accumulate iron. Furthermore, the efficiency of iron uptake and transport is closely related to the characteristics of the plant’s root system, morphology, and antioxidants (Fig. 7). Different cultivars, such as Basmati-515 and Basmati-198, exhibited variations in morphology and antioxidants that influenced the cultivar’s ability to acquire iron from the soil, allowing them to accumulate higher iron levels in either alkaline or acidic soil conditions. Further research is needed to explore the genetic and physiological basis for the differential iron accumulation observed in various cultivars and soil pH conditions.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Impact of iron fertilizer treatment on iron accumulation in rice plants and pH-dependent solubility

Full size image

Conclusion

On the basis of current findings, it can be concluded that Fe deficiency caused a significant decrease in all morphological characteristics such as plant height, root and shoot fresh and dry biomass, total plant biomass production, photosynthetic activity, and gas parameters due to the lower availability of Fe in alkaline soil. While significant increases in oxidative stress markers (MDA and H2O2) increased in Fe deficient conditions, which were reduced by treatment with FeSO4 by the production of CAT, APX, POD, SOD, GPX and DPPH. Thus, the application of Fe is a safer and better way to increase iron content in O. sativa as well as biomass production. Basmati-515 and Basmati-198 performed better in alkaline and acidic soils, respectively, than the control and other cultivars of O. sativa. However, the acidic and alkaline restrictions on iron availability in soil, as well as the influence of pH on iron transporter genes, must be investigated further at the molecular level.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Calayugan MIC, Swamy BM, Nha CT, Palanog AD, Biswas PS, Descalsota-Empleo GI, Min YMM, Inabangan-Asilo MA. Zinc-biofortified rice: a sustainable food-based product for fighting zinc malnutrition. Rice Improvement: physiological, molecular breeding and genetic perspectives. Springer International Publishing Cham; 2021: 449–70.

  2. Pérez-Almeida I, Celi-Herán R, Sánchez-Mora F, Paz-Carrasco L, Ramos-Viteri B. Assessment of molecular genetic diversity of ecuadorian rice cultivars using simple sequence repeat markers. Bioagro 2019, 31(1).

  3. Organization WH. The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2019: safeguarding against economic slowdowns and downturns. Volume 2019. Food & Agriculture Org; 2019.

  4. Shen Y, Huang H, Wang Y, Yang R, Ke X. Antioxidant effects of Se-glutathione peroxidase in alcoholic liver disease. J Trace Elem Med Biol 2022:127048.

  5. Toxqui L, Vaquero MP. Chronic iron deficiency as an emerging risk factor for osteoporosis: a hypothesis. Nutrients. 2015;7(4):2324–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sundararajan S, Rabe H. Prevention of iron deficiency anemia in infants and toddlers. Pediatr Res. 2021;89(1):63–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Camaschella C. New insights into iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia. Blood Rev. 2017;31(4):225–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang J, Jones A, Waite TD, Chen Y, Huang X, Rosso KM, Kappler A, Mansor M, Tratnyek PG, Zhang H. Fe (II) redox chemistry in the environment. Chem Rev. 2021;121(13):8161–233.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tripathi DK, Singh S, Gaur S, Singh S, Yadav V, Liu S, Singh VP, Sharma S, Srivastava P, Prasad SM. Acquisition and homeostasis of iron in higher plants and their probable role in abiotic stress tolerance. Front Environ Sci. 2018;5:86.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huang X, Zhu-Barker X, Horwath WR, Faeflen SJ, Luo H, Xin X, Jiang X. Effect of iron oxide on nitrification in two agricultural soils with different pH. Biogeosciences. 2016;13(19):5609–17.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Li P, Chen Y-H, Lu J, Zhang C-Q, Liu Q-Q, Li Q-F. Genes and their molecular functions determining seed structure, components, and quality of rice. Rice. 2022;15(1):18.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rout GR, Sahoo S. Role of iron in plant growth and metabolism. Reviews in Agricultural Science. 2015;3:1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Briat J-F, Dubos C, Gaymard F. Iron nutrition, biomass production, and plant product quality. Trends Plant Sci. 2015;20(1):33–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Krohling CA, Eutrópio FJ, Bertolazi AA, Dobbss LB, Campostrini E, Dias T, Ramos AC. Ecophysiology of iron homeostasis in plants. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2016;62(1):39–47.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rasheed R, Ashraf MA, Ahmad SJN, Parveen N, Hussain I, Bashir R. Taurine regulates ROS metabolism, osmotic adjustment, and nutrient uptake to lessen the effects of alkaline stress on Trifolium alexandrinum L. plants. South Afr J Bot. 2022;148:482–98.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Waters BM, Amundsen K, Graef G. Gene expression profiling of iron deficiency chlorosis sensitive and tolerant soybean indicates key roles for phenylpropanoids under alkalinity stress. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Riaz MU, Ayub MA, Khalid H, ul Haq MA, Rasul A, ur Rehman MZ, Ali S. Fate of micronutrients in alkaline soils. Resour use Effi Agric 2020:577–613.

  18. Valipour M, Khoshgoftarmanesh AH, Baninasab B. Physiological responses of hawthorn (Crataegus persica Pojark.) And quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill.) Rootstocks to bicarbonate-induced iron deficiency in nutrient solution. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 2018;181(6):905–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shukla AK, Behera SK, Prakash C, Tripathi A, Patra AK, Dwivedi BS, Trivedi V, Rao CS, Chaudhari SK, Das S. Deficiency of phyto-available sulphur, zinc, boron, iron, copper and manganese in soils of India. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):19760.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Bana RS, Grover M, Kumar V, Jat GS, Kuri BR, Singh D, Kumar H, Bamboriya SD. Multi-micronutrient foliar fertilization in eggplant under diverse fertility scenarios: Effects on productivity, nutrient biofortification and soil microbial activity. Sci Hort. 2022;294:110781.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Saleem A, Zulfiqar A, Ali B, Naseeb MA, Almasaudi AS, Harakeh S. Iron Sulfate (FeSO4) improved physiological attributes and antioxidant capacity by reducing oxidative stress of Oryza sativa L. Cultivars in Alkaline Soil. Sustainability. 2022;14(24):16845.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zulfiqar U, Hussain S, Maqsood M, Ishfaq M, Ali N. Zinc nutrition to enhance rice productivity, zinc use efficiency, and grain biofortification under different production systems. Crop Sci. 2021;61(1):739–49.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zulfiqar A, Naseer S, Saleem A, Sabar M, Ahmed S, Sardar R, Shahzadi F, Raza Q. Genetic diversity studies for grain iron and zinc content analysis for Elite rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotype by using SSR markers. J Food Compos Anal. 2023;115:104816.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Taylor GJ, Crowder A. Use of the DCB technique for extraction of hydrous iron oxides from roots of wetland plants. Am J Bot. 1983;70(8):1254–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Aebi H. [13] catalase in vitro. Methods in enzymology. Vol. 105: Elsevier; 1984: 121–6.

  26. Nakano Y, Asada K. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 1981;22(5):867–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sakharov IY, Ardila GB. Variations of peroxidase activity in cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) beans during their ripening, fermentation and drying. Food Chem. 1999;65(1):51–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen C-N, Pan S-M. Assay of superoxide dismutase activity by combining electrophoresis and densitometry. Bot Bull Acad Sinica 1996, 37.

  29. Chance B, Maehly A. [136] Assay of catalases and peroxidases. 1955.

  30. Marinova G, Batchvarov V. Evaluation of the methods for determination of the free radical scavenging activity by DPPH. Bulgarian J Agricultural Sci. 2011;17(1):11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jana S, Choudhuri MA. Glycolate metabolism of three submersed aquatic angiosperms: effect of heavy metals. Aquat Bot. 1981;11:67–77.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Heath RL, Packer L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1968;125(1):189–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lucena JJ, Hernandez-Apaolaza L. Iron nutrition in plants: an overview. Plant Soil. 2017;418:1–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Shekari F, Mohammadi H, Pourmohammad A, Avanes A, Benam MBK. Spring wheat yielding and the content of protein and zinc in its grain depending on zinc fertilisation. Electron J Pol Agricultural Universities 2015, 18(1).

  35. Kalra T, Tomar PC, Arora K. Micronutrient encapsulation using nanotechnology: Nanofertilizers. Plant Arch. 2020;20(2):1748–53.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mohammed S, Alsafadi K, Enaruvbe GO, Harsányi E. Assessment of soil micronutrient level for vineyard production in southern Syria. Model Earth Syst Environ 2021:1–10.

  37. Neina D. The role of soil pH in plant nutrition and soil remediation. Appl Environ soil Sci. 2019;2019:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang Y-Y, Wu W, Liu H. Factors affecting variations of soil pH in different horizons in hilly regions. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(6):e0218563.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Zaid A, Ahmad B, Jaleel H, Wani SH, Hasanuzzaman M. A critical review on iron toxicity and tolerance in plants: role of exogenous phytoprotectants. Plant micronutrients: Deficiency and toxicity management 2020:83–99.

  40. Hsieh E-J, Waters BM. Alkaline stress and iron deficiency regulate iron uptake and riboflavin synthesis gene expression differently in root and leaf tissue: implications for iron deficiency chlorosis. J Exp Bot. 2016;67(19):5671–85.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang X, Zhang D, Sun W, Wang T. The adaptive mechanism of plants to iron deficiency via iron uptake, transport, and homeostasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(10):2424.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Vogl T, Glieder A. Regulation of Pichia pastoris promoters and its consequences for protein production. New Biotechnol. 2013;30(4):385–404.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Romera FJ, Lucena C, Alcàntara E. Plant hormones influencing iron uptake in plants. Iron nutrition in plants and rhizospheric microorganisms. Springer; 2006: 251–78.

  44. Akhtar S, Hussain M, Afzal M, Gilani SA. The impact of teacher-student interaction on student motivation and achievement. Eur Acad Res. 2019;7(2):1201–22.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Li J, Cao X, Jia X, Liu L, Cao H, Qin W, Li M. Iron deficiency leads to chlorosis through impacting chlorophyll synthesis and nitrogen metabolism in Areca catechu L. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:710093.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Abbas G, Saqib M, Akhtar J, Haq, MAu. Interactive effects of salinity and iron deficiency on different rice genotypes. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 2015;178(2):306–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Therby-Vale R, Lacombe B, Rhee SY, Nussaume L, Rouached H. Mineral nutrient signaling controls photosynthesis: focus on iron deficiency-induced chlorosis. Trends Plant Sci. 2022;27(5):502–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Manoj KM. Aerobic respiration: criticism of the proton-centric explanation involving rotary adenosine triphosphate synthesis, chemiosmosis principle, proton pumps and electron transport chain. Biochem insights. 2018;11:1178626418818442.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Andrew E, Dorcas O, Olawale O. Effects of Iron on the Productivity of Lowland Rice (O. sativa L.) in segregating populations. Am J Agric Forestry. 2020;8(4):91–9.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Shah AA, Yasin NA, Mudassir M, Ramzan M, Hussain I, Siddiqui MH, Ali HM, Shabbir Z, Ali A, Ahmed S. Iron oxide nanoparticles and selenium supplementation improve growth and photosynthesis by modulating antioxidant system and gene expression of chlorophyll synthase (CHLG) and protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase (POR) in arsenic-stressed Cucumis melo. Environ Pollut. 2022;307:119413.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Rossatto T, do Amaral MN, Benitez LC, Vighi IL, Braga EJB, de Magalhães Júnior AM, Maia MAC, da Silva Pinto L. Gene expression and activity of antioxidant enzymes in rice plants, cv. BRS AG, under saline stress. Physiol Mol Biology Plants. 2017;23:865–75.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Afzal J, Saleem MH, Batool F, Elyamine AM, Rana MS, Shaheen A, El-Esawi MA, Tariq Javed M, Ali Q, Arslan Ashraf M. Role of ferrous sulfate (FeSO4) in resistance to cadmium stress in two rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. Biomolecules. 2020;10(12):1693.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Jia N, Qiao H, Zhu W, Zhu M, Meng Q, Lu Q, Zu Y. Antioxidant, immunomodulatory, oxidative stress inhibitory and iron supplementation effect of Astragalus membranaceus polysaccharide-iron (III) complex on iron-deficiency anemia mouse model. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;132:213–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Maurya AK. Oxidative stress in crop plants. Agronomic Crops: Volume 3: Stress Responses and Tolerance 2020:349–380.

  55. Mehla N, Sindhi V, Josula D, Bisht P, Wani SH. An introduction to antioxidants and their roles in plant stress tolerance. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant Systems in Plants: role and regulation under abiotic stress 2017:1–23.

  56. Patel P, Trivedi G, Saraf M. Iron biofortification in mungbean using siderophore producing plant growth promoting bacteria. Environ Sustain. 2018;1:357–65.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ghasemi S, Khoshgoftarmanesh AH, Afyuni M, Hadadzadeh H. Iron (II)–amino acid chelates alleviate salt-stress induced oxidative damages on tomato grown in nutrient solution culture. Sci Hort. 2014;165:91–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Ghasemi S, Khoshgoftarmanesh AH, Hadadzadeh H, Jafari M. Synthesis of iron-amino acid chelates and evaluation of their efficacy as iron source and growth stimulator for tomato in nutrient solution culture. J Plant Growth Regul. 2012;31:498–508.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Šamec D, Karalija E, Šola I, Vujčić Bok V, Salopek-Sondi B. The role of polyphenols in abiotic stress response: the influence of molecular structure. Plants. 2021;10(1):118.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Botany, University of the Punjab Lahore, Lahore, 54590, Pakistan

    Ammara Saleem & Asma Zulfiqar

  2. Centre for Applied Molecular Biology, University of the Punjab Lahore, Lahore, 54590, Pakistan

    Muhammad Zafar Saleem

  3. Department of Plant Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan

    Baber Ali

  4. College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China

    Muhammad Hamzah Saleem

  5. Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Government College University, Faisalabad, 38040, Pakistan

    Shafaqat Ali

  6. Department of Biological Sciences and Technology, China Medical University (CMU), Taichung City, 40402, Taiwan

    Shafaqat Ali

  7. Food and Agriculture Vocational School, Department of Field Crops, Cankiri Karatekin Universitesi, 18100, Cankiri, Turkey

    Ebru Derelli Tufekci

  8. Faculty of Science, Department of Chemistry, Cankiri Karatekin Universitesi, Cankiri18100, Turkey

    Ali Rıza Tufekci

  9. Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Science and High Technology and Environmental Sciences, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran

    Mehdi Rahimi

  10. Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Benha University, Benha, 13518, Egypt

    Reham M. Mostafa

Authors
  1. Ammara Saleem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Asma Zulfiqar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Muhammad Zafar Saleem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Baber Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Muhammad Hamzah Saleem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shafaqat Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ebru Derelli Tufekci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ali Rıza Tufekci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Mehdi Rahimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Reham M. Mostafa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, Ammara Saleem, Asma Zulfiqar; Muhammad Zafar Saleem; Data curation, Baber Ali, Muhammad Hamzah Saleem, Reham M. Mostafa; Formal analysis, Shafaqat Ali, Ebru Derelli Tufekci, Ali Rıza Tufekci, Reham M. Mostafa, Baber Ali, Muhammad Hamzah Saleem; Investigation, Ammara Saleem, Asma Zulfiqar; Methodology; Muhammad Zafar Saleem; Project administration, Asma Zulfiqar; Resources, Asma Zulfiqar; Software, Muhammad Hamzah Saleem and Baber Ali; Validation, Shafaqat Ali; Visualization, Mehdi Rahimi., Shafaqat Ali; Writing – original draft Ammara Saleem, Asma Zulfiqar; Muhammad Zafar Saleem; Writing – review & editing, Ammara Saleem, Asma Zulfiqar; Muhammad Zafar Saleem, Baber Ali, Muhammad Hamzah Saleem, Shafaqat Ali, Ebru Derelli Tufekci, Ali Rıza Tufekci, Reham M. Mostafa, Mehdi Rahimi.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Asma Zulfiqar or Mehdi Rahimi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

In this study, experimental research, and field studies on plants (either cultivated or wild), including the collection of plant material involved from University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan. All the protocols and experiment were conducted according to national, and international guidelines and legislation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saleem, A., Zulfiqar, A., Saleem, M.Z. et al. Alkaline and acidic soil constraints on iron accumulation by Rice cultivars in relation to several physio-biochemical parameters. BMC Plant Biol 23, 397 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04400-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04400-x

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us