Skip to main content

Independent flavonoid and anthocyanin biosynthesis in the flesh of a red-fleshed table grape revealed by metabolome and transcriptome co-analysis

Abstract

Background

Red flesh is a desired fruit trait, but the regulation of red flesh formation in grape is not well understood. ‘Mio Red’ is a seedless table grape variety with light-red flesh and blue-purple skin. The skin color develops at veraison whereas the flesh color develops at a later stage of berry development. The flesh and skin flavonoid metabolomes and transcriptomes were analyzed.

Results

A total of 161 flavonoids were identified, including 16 anthocyanins. A total of 66 flavonoids were found at significantly different levels in the flesh and skin (fold change ≥ 2 or ≤ 0.5, variable importance in projection (VIP) ≥ 1). The main anthocyanins in the flesh were pelargonidin and peonidin, and in the skin were peonidin, delphinidin, and petunidin. Transcriptome comparison revealed 57 differentially expressed structural genes of the flavonoid-metabolism pathway (log2fold change  1, FDR < 0.05, FPKM ≥ 1). Two differentially expressed anthocyanin synthase (ANS) genes were annotated, ANS2 (Vitvi02g00435) with high expression in flesh and ANS1 (Vitvi11g00565) in skin, respectively. One dihydro flavonol 4-reductase (DFR, Vitvi18g00988) gene was differentially expressed although high in both skin and flesh. Screened and correlation analysis of 12 ERF, 9 MYB and 3 bHLH genes. The Y1H and dual luciferase assays showed that MYBA1 highly activates the ANS2 promoter in flesh and that ERFCBF6 was an inhibitory, EFR23 and bHLH93 may activate the DFR gene. These genes may be involved in the regulation of berry flesh color.

Conclusions

Our study revealed that anthocyanin biosynthesis in grape flesh is independent of that in the skin. Differentially expressed ANS, MYB and ERF transcription factors provide new clues for the future breeding of table grapes that will provide the health benefits as red wine.

Background

Grape is one of the most important fruit in the world, with several thousands of recorded varieties. In 2019, grapevine planting area was 6.93 million ha, and production reached 77.14 million tons (http://www.fao.org/faostat/zh/ # data/QC). China is the largest table grape producer and consumer. Grape berry development follows a typical double-sigmoid growth curve. Veraison, the start of stage III on this curve, is marked by berry softening and changing skin color [1]. Based on the skin color, grape varieties can be divided into two major categories: red grapes, which are purple, red or pink, and white grapes, which are light green to golden-colored at ripening.

Flavonoids are a class of secondary metabolites that include flavanones, proanthocyanidins and anthocyanidins. They scavenge reactive oxygen species in plants, and are of high value for human health [2]. Anthocyanins are one of the most important flavonoids in grape berries determining berry color. Six anthocyanidins are commonly identified in grape berries: cyanidin, peonidin, delphinidin, malvidin, pelargonidin and petunidin [3]. The dominant anthocyanin differs in different grape varieties, and pelargonidin derivatives are barely detectable in most Vitis vinifera varieties [4].

Anthocyanin biosynthesis via the phenylpropanoid- and flavonoid-biosynthesis pathways, and the main regulatory transcription factors (TFs), have been widely elucidated in grape skin [5]. In the flavonoid-biosynthesis pathway, proteins encoded by late biosynthesis genes (LBGs) including dihydro flavonol 4-reductase (DFR), anthocyanin synthase (ANS) and UDP-glucose: flavonoid-3-O-glucosyltransferase (UFGT) are the most important enzymes for anthocyanin biosynthesis and stability [6]. Anthocyanins are synthesized in the cytoplasm and then transported to vacuoles for storage. However, the mechanism governing anthocyanin transport is unclear. Four types of anthocyanin transporters have been reported in grape: glutathione S-transferase (GST), ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, multidrug and toxic compound extrusion transporters (MATE), and bilitranslocase (BTL) [7]. A total of 161 transporters were identified in a study of the grape vacuolar proteome in our laboratory, among which 13 ABC transporters were more abundant at fruit maturity [8].

Among the large MYB TF family, subgroups 5 and 6 are regarded as inhibitors and activators of anthocyanin biosynthesis, respectively [9]. V. vinifera (Vv) MYBA1 and VvMYBA2 have been identified as the main TFs regulating grape-skin coloring [10, 11]. Subgroup III of basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) has been reported to be involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis [12, 13]; VvMYC1 interacts with MYBs in grapes and participates in the regulation of anthocyanin and proanthocyanin biosynthesis [14]. Some ethylene response factor (ERF) TFs have also been found to regulate anthocyanin accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana [15], as well as apple [16] and other fruit.

The differential expression of key enzyme genes regulated by TFs in various developmental periods and organs of plants gives tissue synthesis specificity to anthocyanins, especially in some red-fleshed fruit types [17]. In apple, MdMYB1 binds to the MdDFR and MdUFGT promoters, and MdMYBA regulates the expression of MdANS, which is involved in the synthesis of anthocyanin in the pericarp [18]. MdMYB10 regulates the synthesis of anthocyanin in apple pulp, it interacts with MdbHLH3/33 to increase the activity of the MdDFR promoter [19]. Genotypic differences among varieties lead to different key structural genes for anthocyanin synthesis in red kiwifruit, AcUFGT3a is the key synthetase for anthocyanin in ‘Hongyang’ fruit, LDOX, AcF3GT1, and AcF3GGT1 control key structural genes for anthocyanin accumulation in some red-fleshed fruits of Chinese kiwifruit, respectively [20]. AcMYB110 has been shown to activate F3GT expression, and AcMYB10 interacts with AcbHLH42 to activate the expression of LDOX and F3GT [21].

For most red grape varieties, anthocyanin only exists in vacuoles of the 3–4 layers of the skin, and the flesh and juice are white. Red flesh is rare among grape varieties, with ‘Alicante Bouschet’ being the best-known of these: it has rose-red flesh, and is used as a teinturier variety to enhance the color of red wine. ‘Yan73’ is a Chinese teinturier variety from a cross between ‘Alicante Bouschet’ and ‘Muscat Hamburg’ [22]. In ‘Yan73’, anthocyanin appears to accumulate in the flesh before veraison, and in comparison to its dark-skinned, white-fleshed parent ‘Muscat Hamburg’, the accumulation of anthocyanins in ‘YAN73’ flesh likely due to the tissue-specific expression of OMT, AM3, GST, F3’5’H, LDOX and MYBA1 genes in flesh tissue [23].

The red-flesh phenotype exists in many fruits, such as orange, kiwi, apple and plum, among others. With their higher antioxidant capacity and attractive color, red-fleshed fruit are welcomed by the market. Our laboratory bred a red-fleshed table grape—variety ‘Mio Red’. This grape is destined for fresh consumption, but it is also suitable for making juice. Comparing and analyzing the different coloring in the flesh and skin of ‘Mio Red’ berries could provide a further understanding of the coloring regulation in berry flesh, which could in turn benefit future breeding of such grapes as healthy snacks.

Results

Flavonoids in the skin and flesh of ‘Mio Red’ at ripening

The skin and flesh of ‘Mio Red’ berry demonstrated different colors at ripening. The skin was uniformly deep purple–black, while the flesh color was red with a higher concentration around the style (Fig. 1A). Microscopic observation supported flesh coloration as an independent event, rather than due to diffusion of anthocyanin from the skin, because layers of non-colored cells could be seen between the skin and the colored flesh tissue, and in the flesh, the colored areas were concentrated in a multiple-subarea pattern (Fig. 1B). The anthocyanin content of ‘Mio Red’ flesh was about 6.2 times lower than that of the skin. Total flavonoid content demonstrated the same trend: in the flesh it was 14.25 times lower than in the skin (Fig. 1C).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Anthocyanin accumulation and total flavonoids in the skin and flesh of ‘Mio Red’. (A) Colored skin and flesh at berry ripening (86 DAA). (B) Distribution of anthocyanin in the flesh. Upper figure: observation of skin and flesh. Lower figure: flesh near the style. (C) Content of anthocyanin and total flavonoids in the skin and flesh; significance between groups was determined by Student’s t-test, different lowercase letters indicate significant differences. Error bar indicates standard error, p < 0.05

Table 1 Anthocyanins identified in skin and flesh of ‘Mio Red’ grape

A total of 161 flavonoids were identified in the colored skin and flesh of ‘Mio Red’, which could be further divided into 8 groups of 57 flavones, 30 flavonols, 14 flavanones, 17 polyphenols, 16 anthocyanins, 19 flavonoids, 5 isoflavones and 3 proanthocyanins (Table S2). Clustering analysis of the flavonoid data revealed obvious differences between and within the two samples (Fig. S1A). Principal component analysis showed a clear trend of separation between the sample groups, with PC1 and PC2 contributing 84.23% and 5.89% of the difference, respectively (Fig. S1B), indicating that there was a significant difference between the metabolites in the skin and flesh of ‘Mio Red’ grape. A hierarchical heatmap clustered all biological replicates together, and metabolites of the same type together (Fig. S1C), demonstrating the high reliability of the flavonoid metabolome results.

Sixty-six metabolites showed different contents in ‘Mio Red’ flesh and skin by VIP ≥ 1 and fold change ≥ 2 or ≤ 0.5. (Table S3). Compared to the skin, 63 flavonoids had a lower content, and 3 had significantly higher content in the flesh; the latter 3 were epicatechin-epiafzelechin, apigenin 6,8-C-diglucoside and quercetin O-glucoside/hesperetin 5-O-glucoside. These three flavonoids were barely detected in the skin (Fig. S2A). The six common anthocyanins reported in grape were detected in both the skin and flesh of ‘Mio Red’, but their contents were significantly different in the two tissues. There were three differentially accumulated anthocyanins in the skin and flesh: peonidin, delphinidin 3-O-glucoside, petunidin 3, 5-diglucoside (Table 1). Peonidin derivatives were the main anthocyanin in the skin, whereas the flesh was dominated by pelargonidin derivatives (Table S4), further supporting the independent coloration of flesh and skin of ‘Mio Red’.

Four flavonoid-biosynthesis pathways with significant differences between the flesh and skin were found by locating the differentially accumulated metabolites (DAMs) in the KEGG pathway; the flavonoid and flavonol biosynthesis pathway had the largest number of metabolites showing differential levels, followed by the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway (Fig. S2B).

Transcriptome differences between ‘mio red’ skin and flesh

Three biological replicates of each sample (skin and flesh of ‘Mio Red’ grape berries 86 DAA) were subjected to RNA-seq analysis. After filtering, transcriptome sequencing gave 149,774,478 and 158,097,474 clean reads from skin and flesh respectively, of which 93.8% reached Q30 (Table S5), and 78.01–83.80% were uniquely matched with the grape reference genome (map quality ≥ 30) (Table S6). There were 20,929 genes expressed in both skin and flesh, and 1,326 and 1,531 genes were specifically expressed in the skin and flesh, respectively (Fig. 2A).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Transcriptome analysis of the skin and flesh of ‘Mio Red’ grape 86 DAA. (A) Venn diagram of all expressed genes in the skin and flesh. (B) FPKM value distribution of DEGs (log2fold change  1, FDR < 0.05, FPKM ≥ 1) in the skin and flesh. (C) Enriched KEGG pathways (top 20) of DEGs

With |log2fold change| 1, FDR < 0.05 and FPKM ≥ 1 as thresholds, 3,970 DEGs were screened from the transcriptome data (Table S7), among which 1,420 genes were upregulated and 2,550 genes downregulated in the flesh compared to the skin. Expression-level analysis showed that about 0.2% of the DEGs were very highly expressed (FPKM > 1000), 5.4% were highly expressed (FPKM ~ 100–1000), and 56.2% had FPKM of 1–100 (Fig. 2B). Further KEGG-pathway enrichment revealed that metabolic pathway, flavonoid biosynthesis pathway, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, and flavonoid and flavonol biosynthesis pathway were among the top-ranked, in addition to the enrichment of genes encoding ABC transporter protein (Fig. 2C).

Expression of structural genes of flavonoid- and anthocyanin-biosynthesis pathways

A total of 2 CHS, 2 CHI, 2 F3’H, 2 F3’5’H and 2 F3H genes were identified as DEGs in flavonoid pathway, among which, these genes were down-regulated in flesh, consistent with the low content of total flavonoids in flesh tissue. (Table S8). Among F3H, F3’H and F3’5’H, F3H had the highest FPKM value, followed by F3’H, and F3’5’H with the lowest FPKM; one F3’5’H (Vitvi06g01895) exhibited the highest fold change in transcript abundance, with FPKM value in the skin that was about 12-fold higher than in the flesh. The significant difference in F3’5’H expression may be lead to the difference in anthocyanin ratio between delphinidin 3-O-glucoside and petunidin 3,5-diglucoside (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Expression profiles of DEGs involved in flavonoid-biosynthesis pathway. Scale from white (low) to red (high) indicates FPKM value in skin and flesh of ‘Mio Red’ 86 DAA. Red and blue boxes indicate anthocyanins and polyphenols, respectively

Only one DFR gene was differentially expressed, although its expression was high in both skin and flesh. Two differentially expressed ANS genes were identified: ANS1 (Vitvi02g00435) and ANS2 (Vitvi11g00565) were highly expressed in the skin and flesh, respectively. The FPKM value of ANS2 was 201 in the flesh, 5 times that in the skin. Only one DEG was revealed with UFGT, with about 8 times higher expression in the skin than in the flesh (Fig. 3).

The transcript abundance of genes involved in flavonol and proanthocyanidin biosynthesis was significantly lower than that of the anthocyanin-biosynthesis branch. It is worth noting that the expression level of FLS (Vitvi18g02538) in the flesh was 8.2 times higher than that in the skin, which is in agreement with the metabolome result that the flesh of ‘Mio Red’ tends to accumulate more flavonols relative to the skin. DEGs LAR and ANR, which had extremely low expression in both the skin and flesh, were consistent with the detected low proanthocyanidin content.

Flavonoid-biosynthesis gene expression during berry development

The expression of structural flavonoid-biosynthesis genes was found to align with the specific flavonoid and anthocyanin accumulation characteristics in the flesh and skin. In the phenylpropanoid pathway, CHS and CHI demonstrated overall increased expression in the early stage of berry development, which then decreased from veraison to berry ripening. Overall higher expression was found in the skin than in the flesh, in agreement with the higher flavonoid and anthocyanin contents in the skin. High expression of CHS and CHI in the flesh was found on 72 and 65 DAA, respectively (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

QRT-PCR of genes associated with flavonoid metabolism during ‘Mio Red’ grape berry development. All qRT-PCR calculations of expression levels were normalized using the corresponding Ct values of the grape β-actin gene. Values are means ± SE of three biological replicates, p < 0.05

In the flavonoid pathway, F3’5’H, F3’H, F3H, ANS, UFGT and LAR showed overall higher expression in the skin than in the flesh, especially UFGT which demonstrated the largest difference in expression. F3’H and F3H revealed higher expression in the flesh than in the skin 86 DAA, supporting the late anthocyanin accumulation feature of ‘Mio Red’ flesh. Moreover, expression of FLS and ANR, key genes for the biosynthesis of flavonols and proanthocyanins, respectively, had generally higher expression in the flesh than in the skin (Fig. 4), supporting the high levels of apigenin 6,8-C-diglucoside, epicatechin-epiafzelechin and quercetin O-glucoside/hesperetin 5-O-glucoside found in the flesh.

Identification and correlation analysis of TFs related to flavonoid biosynthesis

The important TF families associated with fruit growth and development were identified in the transcriptomes of the skin and flesh of ‘Mio Red’, including 45 AP2/ERF, 39 MYB (including MYB-related TFs), 32 bHLH, 27 WRKY and 23 NAC. Most of the of NAC TFs were upregulated in the flesh. The number of upregulated and downregulated genes of bHLH was the same. Members of the rest of the TF families were mostly downregulated in the flesh vs. skin (Fig. 5A).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Clustering of differentially expressed TFs in the skin and flesh of ‘Mio Red’. (A) Expression profile of major TF families. Red and blue colors indicate the number of TFs that are up- and downregulated in flesh compared to skin, respectively. (B) Phylogenetic tree analysis of ERF DEGs. (C) Phylogenetic tree analysis of R2R3-MYB DEGs in subgroups 4/5/6/7. (D) Phylogenetic tree analysis of bHLH DEGs in subgroup III. Scale from white (low) to red (high) indicates FPKM value. GenBank accession numbers of the TFs are listed in Table S9

The ERF, MYB (subgroups 4/5/6/7) and bHLH (Subgroup III) TFs annotated in the transcriptome of ‘Mio Red’ as related to the biosynthesis of anthocyanin were constructed into their respective phylogenetic trees to screen for TFs that might be involved in the regulation of berry flesh coloration. A total of 12 ERF, 9 MYB and 3 bHLH genes were screened. ERF Vitvi18g01617 and ERFBP-like1 Vitvi18g02398 were highly expressed in both skin and flesh. They clustered with PbERF3 of pear, JcERF035 of physic nut (Jatropha curcas L.) and MdERF38 of apple, respectively (Fig. 5B).

Among the MYB TFs, MYBA1/2/3 clustered in subgroup 6, and were highly expressed in both skin and flesh; these TFs may directly regulate fruit coloring. MYBC2-L3 and MYB3 were clustered in subgroup 4, which may play a role in feedback regulation and inhibit the excessive accumulation of anthocyanin. MYBPA7 was clustered in subgroup 5; its expression level was low, consistent with the low content of proanthocyanin in ‘Mio Red’ fruit. MYBPA1 was clustered in subgroup 7, homologous to VvMYBPA1 and VvMYBF1 (Fig. 5C). Among bHLH TFs, MYC2 gene had a high expression level in both skin and flesh and clustered with AtMYC2/4/5 of Arabidopsis thaliana. bHLH93 and bHLH116, which clustered together with AtbHLH33, were highly expressed in the skin and flesh, respectively (Fig. 5D).

Integrated analysis of DEGs and DAMs related to flavonoid biosynthesis and transport

The genes and metabolites with high expression/abundance in the flavonoid pathway and a Pearson correlation coefficient greater than 0.8 were selected for correlation analysis. Genes and metabolites were negatively correlated in quadrants 1 and 9, and positively correlated in quadrants 3 and 7 (Fig. 6A). The number of genes and metabolites in quadrants 7 and 9 was much higher than that in quadrants 3 and 1, indicating that genes and metabolites related to flavonoids in the flesh were significantly downregulated compared to the skin, regardless of whether the genes were positively or negatively regulated. KEGG enrichment of combined DEGs and DAMs showed that only the flavonoid-biosynthesis pathway was significantly enriched (p < 0.05) (Fig. 6B).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Integral analysis of DAMs and DEGs. (A) Nine-quadrant diagram, DEGs and DAMs with Pearson correlation coefficients greater than 0.8 were divided into 1–9 quadrants from left to right and from top to bottom with black dotted lines. (B) KEGG enrichment histogram. X-axis represents metabolic pathways. Y-axis represents expression as -log (p-value). Green and red represent DEGs and DAMs, respectively. (C) Expression profile of flavonoid-associated transporters and their correlation heatmap with DAMs. Red, positive correlation; blue, negative correlation; circle size indicates significance: the larger the circle, the higher the significance

A correlation network was constructed with genes and metabolites that were enriched in flavonoid, flavone and flavonol, and anthocyanin biosynthesis, with a correlation coefficient higher than 0.8. Most genes correlated with flavonoid, and flavone and flavonol biosynthesis. Three screened UFGTs correlated with anthocyanin biosynthesis, and could play a key role in the differential coloring of flesh and skin (Fig. S3).

Three types of putative flavonoid-related transporters were identified: 15 GSTs, 5 MATEs and 3 ABC transporters. These may implement the transport of anthocyanins, proanthocyanins and flavonols. The transcriptome results showed that the expression levels of all of the transporter genes were higher in the skin than in the flesh. Among the transporters, GST14 and MATE4 had high FPKM in both skin and flesh. Correlation analysis with metabolites showed that most of the transporters were positively correlated with DAMs. Interestingly, transporter GST8 was negatively correlated with most flavonoids, including two anthocyanins: delphinidin 3-O-glucoside and petunidin 3,5-diglucoside, but only positively correlated with quercetin O-glucoside/hesperetin 5-O-glucoside and epicatechin-epiafzelechin (Fig. 6C).

Effect of candidate TFs on VvDFR and VvANS2 promoter activity

In the biological process of anthocyanin biosynthesis in grape, the downstream anthocyanin biosynthesis branch is the key to controlling color accumulation. We selected two genes encoding key enzymes of the anthocyanin synthesis pathway, VvDFR and VvANS2, which are highly expressed in flesh, as target genes to verify the regulatory role of upstream TFs. The ERFs, MYBs and bHLHs screened for possible involvement in color accumulation of ‘Mio red’ were the main candidate regulators. The promoter sequences of VvDFR and VvANS2 were used as the baits, and the candidate TFs were used as preys. The Y1H assay resulted that ERF23 (Vitvi18g02398), MYB3, and bHLH93 could bind to promoters of VvDFR and VvANS2. ERFCBF6 (Vitvi02g00407) only had interaction with the ANS2 promoter (Fig. 7A). In-vivo dual luciferase assay was conducted in tobacco leaves to detect the specific regulation of VvDFR and VvANS2 gene expression by EFR23, bHLH93 and ERFCBF6. The results showed that ERF23 and bHLH23 could activate the expression of DFR by physically combing with the promoter region, and the activation capacity of ERF23 was significantly stronger than that of bHLH93 (Fig. 7B, left, Fig. 7C). MYB3 had no significant activation or inhibition on both ANS2 and DFR (Fig. S3). MYBA1 plays an important role in the anthocyanin accumulation of grape skins, while ANS2 may be the key structural gene that promotes the coloration of ‘Mio Red’ flesh. The dual luciferase assay results of MYBA1 and ANS2 showed that MYBA1 could significantly activate the activity of ANS2 (Fig. 7B right, Fig. 7C), indicating that MYBA1 also played an important role in ‘Mio red’ flesh coloring. The Luc/Ren ratio of ERFCBF6 + proANS2 was decreased compared to the control, suggested slightly inhibitory effects on ANS2 (Fig. 7B middle, Fig. 7C).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Yeast one-hybrid (Y1H) and dual luciferase (LUC) assays verifying that the candidate TFs increased or decreased the VvDFR and VvANS2 promoter activity. (A) The results of Y1H. (B, C) The results of LUC assays. The promoter activity is described by the LUC/REN ratio. The lowercase letters indicate significance difference between different groups. All the data are means ± SEs of three biological replicates, p < 0.05

Discussion

Anthocyanin accumulation in the flesh of different red-fleshed grape varieties

Most colored grapes only accumulate anthocyanin in the skin at berry ripening; veraison is the common starting point for skin anthocyanin accumulation. However, the timing of anthocyanin development in the flesh is remarkably diverse among the small population of red-fleshed varieties. Flesh coloring of the teinturier wine variety Yan73 begins at stage II of the double-sigmoid curve, clearly earlier than the skin coloring [24]. ‘Summer Black’ is a table grape variety with a V. vinifera and V. labrusca hybrid background. The flesh and skin of the ‘Summer Black’ red-fleshed mutant begin to accumulate color at almost the same time as berry ripening [25]. In the case of ‘Mio Red’, coloration of the flesh occurs significantly later than that of the skin. Since flesh coloration occurs when the skin is already dark, it may have a non-light-dependent character.

The anthocyanin content in the skin and flesh of ‘Yan 73’ had little difference, and the proportion of different anthocyanin derivatives was similar, with malvidin and peonidin derivatives predominating [26]. The anthocyanin species in the skin and flesh of ‘Summer Black’ fruits were also similar, and the red flesh trait is considered to be associated with enhanced anthocyanin biosynthesis in the whole berry [24]. The significant difference between more than one-third of the flavonoid metabolites in the skin and flesh of ‘Mio Red’ grapes, including flavonols, flavonoids and anthocyanins.

Anthocyanin biosynthesis in grape flesh is independent in ‘Mio red’

In other red-fleshed grape varieties, there is only a small difference in the type and content of flavonoids including anthocyanins in skins and flesh. However, unlike them, ‘Mio Red’ grape with peonidin derivatives dominating the anthocyanins in the skin and pelargonidin derivatives in the flesh, implying a difference in the pathways of flavonoids synthesized in the skin and flesh, may be dominated by several different key enzymes.

The differentially expressed genes encoding early synthesis enzymes of the flavonoid pathway, including CHS, CHI, F3’H, F3’5’H, and F3H, all showed high expression in the skin and low expression in the flesh of ‘Mio Red’ grapes. F3’H and F3’5’H produce quercetin and myricetin, respectively, in response to the b-ring hydroxylation of naringin, and these hydroxylases are required for the production of cyanidin and delphindin [27]. The significant difference in F3’5’H expression ultimately leads to differences in the metabolism of delphinidin and petunidin anthocyanins and is a key factor in the blue-purple coloration [28]. The specific high expression of F3’H and F3’5’H in the skin of ‘Mio Red’ corresponded to a significant accumulation of Delphinidin 3-O-glucoside.

Grapes were previously considered to be devoid of pelargonidin [29], because the DFR in the studied varieties could not effectively reduce dihydrokaempferol to produce leucopelargonidin [30]. Later, an extremely low content of pelargonidin was detected in V. vinifera varieties such as Cabernet Sauvignon and Pinot Noir. In ‘Yan73’ grapes, DFR can complete the reduction of dihydrokaempferol, but it favors the synthesis of cyanidin and delphinidin using dihydroquercetin and dihydromyricetin as substrates, so the content of pelargonidin derivatives in ‘Yan73’ is also low [31]. However, in ‘Mio Red’ grapes, and especially in the flesh the DFR expression was also at a high level, pelargonidin accumulated to easily detectable amounts (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Proposed model of the regulatory mechanisms difference of coloration in skin and flesh of ‘Mio Red’. The upper indicates that the skin of ‘Mio red’ grape changes from green to red during ripening, while the lower part for the flesh

Previous studies have reported that the expression pattern of ANS varies in different grape varieties; ANS protein accumulates in various tissues of grapevine and exhibits different effects on secondary metabolites [32, 33]. In this study, two ANS genes were highly expressed in the skin and flesh of ‘Mio Red’, respectively. The specific spatiotemporal expression of the two ANS genes may be involved in the different coloration initiation and anthocyanin content in the skin and flesh of this grape. That is, in ‘Mio Red’ grapes, flavonoid synthesis in the skin and flesh is via different synthetic pathways. Among them, ANS1 and ANS2 in the anthocyanin synthesis branch may be respectively the key enzyme genes dominating in the skin and flesh (Fig. 8).

TFs regulating flavonoid accumulation

There have only been a few studies on TFs that regulate flavonoid synthesis in grape flesh. The study with ‘Yan73’ suggested that anthocyanin accumulation in the flesh tissue is probably coordinated and regulated by transcription activator VvMYBA1 and transcription repressor VvMYBC2-L1 [34]. Comparing the metabolic and transcriptomic profiles of the skin and flesh of three table grape varieties (Kyoho, Wink and Italia), it was found that besides anthocyanin, flavonol and flavanol also differ widely in the two tissues, and MYB24, MADS5 and two ubiquitin proteins (RHA2) were suggested as promising candidates for regulation of flavonoid biosynthesis in grape [35].

In the present study, we screened for TFs related to flavonoid biosynthesis, and a high level of AP2/ERF was found. The direct relationship between ERFs and flavonoid biosynthesis is still unclear. ERFs generally regulate anthocyanin accumulation in fruit by interacting with MYB or bHLH TFs [36,37,38].

MYBA1, MYBA2 and MYBA3 play an activating role in grape anthocyanin biosynthesis by binding to the UFGT promoter [39, 40]. In ‘Mio Red’, the expression of these 3 activators in the skin was significantly higher than that in the flesh. Their expression patterns in the flesh of ‘Mio Red’ could be important to its coloration. In this study, MYBA1 can significantly activate the expression of ANS2, which means that MYBA1 plays an important role in grape flesh coloring, besides in the skin (Fig. 8). According to the object of inhibition, suppressors which fine-tune the synthesis process and maintain fruit homeostasis [41] can be divided into two types: MYB4 and MYBC2-L1 homologs (low-molecular-weight phenolic and flavonoid, respectively) [42]. MYBC2-L1 and MYB3, screened in this study, may inhibit the accumulation of flavonoids. Although the Y1H assay showed that MYB3 could interact with the promoters of ANS2 and DFR, there was no obvious inhibitory effect on their expression, and its specific action and mechanism still need to be further explored.

The MYBPA7, regulating proanthocyanin biosynthesis [43], was clustered into subgroup 5. The low expression of MYBPA7, especially in the flesh, could be the main reason for the low accumulation of proanthocyanins in ‘Mio Red’. Studies have shown that VvMYBPA1 activating promoters of several flavonoid-pathway structural genes, including CHS, F3’5’H, ANS, LAR and ANR, participates in the biosynthesis of procyanidins [44, 45]. MYBPA1 in ‘Mio red’ may mainly regulate the flavonol biosynthesis.

The bHLH93 screened from the phylogenetic tree were clustered together with AtbHLH116 (ICE1) and AtbHLH93 (ICE2), which reported as a role in low-temperature stress [46]. In this study, it was found that bHLH93 significantly activated DFR, an important gene in anthocyanin synthesis pathway (Fig. 8). Previous studies have shown that low temperature stress can promote anthocyanin accumulation while affecting plant growth and development [47], bHLH93 may be the bridge connecting anthocyanin pathway initiation under low temperature stress.

In this study, the results of the Y1H and dual luciferase assays demonstrated that MYB3 can bind to the DFR promoter in vitro, whereas ERF23, MYB3 and bHLH93 can bind to the ANS2 promoter. However, no significant activation or inhibition effect was identified in tobacco leaves. This may due to the fact that the in-vivo performance of many TFs is affected by other cofactors, non-coding RNAs or signals from pathways that are induced by environmental conditions [48, 49]. In previous studies, ERF, MYB and bHLH TFs were found to require the formation transcription complexes to perform their regulatory functions [50]. It was reported that CmMYB4 in chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium) can bind to the CmbHLH2 promoter, but it requires recruitment of a corepressor, CmTPL, to inhibit the expression of CmbHLH2 [51]. In strawberry (Fragaria vesca), FvbHLH9 is a light-inducible TF which can specifically bind to the promoter of FvDFR, and it exerts its activating function by binding with FvHY5 under light conditions [52]. Moreover, during plant growth and development, expression regulation by TFs may occur only in specific tissues or at specific developmental stages [53, 54]. DNA structure or chromatin state can also influence the binding of TFs to promoters and consequently, the expression of downstream genes [55, 56]. Last but not least, biological false-positive Y1H results cannot be fully excluded by biological replications. Future results from transformation validation in grapes will provide us with new information on the regulation of DFR and ANS2 promoters by the suggested TFs.

Other regulatory factors in flavonoid accumulation

Flavonoids are synthesized in the cytoplasm and then transported to vacuoles for storage or to other destinations where they function as bioactive molecules. Different compartments for flavonoid biosynthesis, storage and function require effective transport mechanisms to realize their biological functions. In grape, VvABCC1, VvGST4, AM1 and AM3 have confirmed roles in anthocyanin transport, and VvGST1 in proanthocyanidin transport [57]. VvMATE1/2, which are homologs of AtTT12 in Arabidopsis thaliana, are located in vacuoles and the Golgi complex, respectively [58]. Stress-induced TaGSTL1 selectively recognizes flavonol in wheat [59]. Our integrated DEG and DAM analysis suggested that GST14 and MATE4 play a role in flavonoid transport, while GST8 might be involved in the transport of quercetin glucoside, hesperetin glucoside and epicatechin-epiafzelechin. Compared to the skin, the expression of transporter genes in the flesh was lower; inefficient transport after synthesis could be another reason for the lower accumulation of flavonol in the flesh.

Structural and regulatory genes in the flavonoid-biosynthesis pathway can be induced by light [60]. Light-induced anthocyanin accumulation requires light-responsive elements, including Constitutively Photomorphogenic 1 (COP1) and Long Hypocotyl 5 (HY5) [61]. In apple, MdMYB1 accumulates in the light and is degraded in the dark [62]. In addition, under low ultraviolet irradiation, the transcription levels of FLS, HY5 and MYB10 in apple fruit are downregulated, and anthocyanin and flavonol contents decrease [63]. In pear, PpBBX16 is an activator of light-induced anthocyanin accumulation [64]. In nature, in many red-fleshed fruit, flesh coloration does not depend on light signals, and follows a different timeline from the light-dependent skin coloration, such as in fig (Ficus carica L.) [65]. Anthocyanin accumulation in the flesh of ‘Mio Red’ berry occurs in little or no light; further elucidation of this mechanism could help us improve the coloring of this high economic value fruit.

Conclusion

The dark-skinned table grape variety ‘Mio Red’ develops flesh coloration at ripening, due to anthocyanin accumulation. Metabolome analysis revealed a different spectrum of flavonoids in the flesh and skin, with pelargonidin derivatives and peonidin derivatives as the major anthocyanins in the former. Transcriptome analysis revealed preferential expression of ANS and differential expression of a small number of MYB TFs in the flesh and skin, including both activators and repressors. The results of the candidate TFs validation assays showed that MYBA1 in the ‘Mio Red’ grape can promote the biosynthesis of anthocyanins in the flesh. Meanwhile, ERF23 and ERFCBF6 participate in the regulation of anthocyanin synthesis through an interaction network. The present study proved our hypothesis that flesh coloration is an independently regulated event in grape berry, and use of the recruited genes for further mechanism elucidation will help pave the way for breeding seedless red-fleshed table grapes with the health benefits of red wines.

Materials and methods

Plant material

‘Mio Red’ vines were grown at Shangzhuang experimental station of China Agricultural University, Beijing (40°23ʹN, 116°49ʹW). Onset of anthesis was on 20 May 2020. From June to August, five samples were collected: 20 days after anthesis (DAA, Stage I on the double-sigmoid curve of fruit development), 35 DAA (end of Stage I), 65 DAA (late Stage II, before veraison), 72 DAA (middle of stage III) and 86 DAA (late stage III). Each sampling consisted of three biological replicates, 40 berries per replicate. Samples were taken randomly from eight clusters growing on different vines, and transported to the laboratory on ice. The berry skin was carefully separated with a scalpel, then the skin and flesh were quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored separately at -80 °C for further use. Based on the flesh color at the five sampling time points, the grape berries collected 86 DAA were selected for metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses.

Determination of total anthocyanin

Tissue anthocyanin content was measured following Ni et al. [66]., with some modifications. Briefly, ~ 0.2 g grape tissue was ground in liquid nitrogen, then mixed with 1 mL methanol: acetic acid solution (99:1, v/v), and placed in a refrigerator at 4 °C for 24 h. The absorbance of the supernatant at 530, 620 and 650 nm was measured by ultraviolet spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). The anthocyanin content was calculated as: [(A530 - A650) − 0.2 × A650 - A620].

Determination of total content of flavonoids

Flavonoid content was determined as in Robinson et al. [67]. After the sample was thoroughly ground in liquid nitrogen, ~ 0.2 g was mixed with 1 mL precooled 80% ethanol, and extracted at 4 °C for 24 h. After centrifuging at 12,000 rpm at 4 °C for 20 min, 0.5 mL supernatant was transferred to a 10-mL centrifuge tube, then 0.3 mL 8% NaNO2, 0.3 mL 10% Al(NO3)3 solution, 2 mL 2 M NaOH solution and 4.9 mL ethanol were added consecutively. After standing for 10 min, the absorbance of the reaction solution was determined at 510 nm. Rutin was used as the standard, and the final flavonoid content was calculated as mg rutin/g fresh weight.

Flavonoid metabolome analysis

Flavonoid metabolome analysis was carried out by Metware Biological Science and Technology Company Ltd. (Wuhan, China) using a well-established protocol [68, 69]. Briefly, ~ 1 g of the frozen-stored grape flesh/skin samples was vacuum freeze-dried, then ground to a fine powder with a mixer mill (MM 400, Retsch). For each extraction, 100 mg powder was dissolved in 1 mL 70% methanol, left to stand at 4 °C for 24 h, then centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 min. The supernatant was filtered through a microporous membrane (0.22 μm) for LC-MS/MS analysis. Each sample consisted of three biological replicates.

Analytical conditions for HPLC were as follows. We used a Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 C18 column (1.8 μm, 2.1 mm x 100 mm). The solvent system consisted of solution A (0.04% acetic acid in water) and solution B (0.04% acetic acid in acetonitrile), with gradient program 100 A:0B (v/v) at 0 min, 5 A:95B at 11.0 min, hold for 1 min, 95 A:5B at 12.1 min, hold to 15.0 min; flow rate was 0.40 mL/min. The column temperature was 40 °C, and the injection volume was 2 µL.

The effluent was connected to a triple quadrupole-linear ion trap (Q TRAP) mass spectrometer equipped with a dual electrospray ionization source in positive ion mode and controlled by Analyst 1.5 software (AB Sciex, Ontario, Canada) [60]. Instrument tuning and mass calibration were set with 10 and 100 µmol/L polypropylene glycol solutions in QQQ and LIT modes, respectively. Purine (C5H4N4) and HP-921 [hexakis-(1 H, 2 H, 3 H-terrafluoro-pentoxy) phosphazene] (C18H18O6N3P3F24) were added for internal mass calibration. According to the metabolites eluted in each period, and the specific set of Q1 and Q3 data, metabolites were identified by annotation against the commonly used Metware Data Base [70]. Thresholds of VIP (variable impact in project) ≥ 1 and fold change ≥ 2 or ≤ 0. 5 were set as criteria for metabolites with significant differences.

Transcriptome analysis

‘Mio Red’ grape skin and flesh collected 86 DAA were selected for total RNA extraction using a modified CTAB method [71], with three biological replicates per sample. RNA quality was checked by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, a NanoPhotometer spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA), a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Life Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) before constructing the libraries. The mRNA enrichment and cDNA library construction followed standard protocols. The libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq platform after qualified quality inspection. After removing the sequencing connectors and low-quality reads, the clean reads were annotated against the grape reference genome [72] and the libraries were compared using HISAT2 [73]. Fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped (FPKM) was used to measure the expression level of the transcripts. DESEQ2 [74] was used to analyze the differential expression among sample groups. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened with |log2fold change| 1 and FDR < 0.05.

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)

Based on the transcriptome data, 11 structural genes in the flavonoid-biosynthesis pathway were selected, and their expression levels at the five sampling timepoints of berry development were validated by qRT-PCR. The primers are listed in Table S1. The PCR was carried out with ABI QuantStudio 6 (Applied Biosystems) using ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). The 10-µL amplification system consisted of 5 µL SYBR qPCR Master Mix, 0.2 µL upstream and downstream primers (10 µM each), 1 µL template, and 3.6 µL distilled water. The amplification procedure was 95 °C 30 s; 40 cycles of 95 °C 10 s, 60 °C 30 s; 95 °C 15 s; 60 °C 60 s; 95 °C 15 s. All samples were run in at least three technical repetitions. Grape β-actin was used as the reference gene, and the data were quantitatively analyzed by 2−ΔΔCT method. Means and standard errors (SEs) were calculated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s test with SPSS Version 16.0 (Chicago, IL, USA). The significance level was set to p < 0.05.

Yeast one-hybrid assay

Y1H assay was performed according to the Yeast Laboratory Manual (Clontech, USA). Vectors pBait-AbAi and pGADT7 were used. The promoter region of VvDFR / VvANS2 was cloned, and cis-acting regulatory elements were predicted by PlantCARE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/). The promoter region and the full-length TF sequences were inserted to the pBait-AbAi and pGADT7 vectors respectively (primer sequences in Table S1). The one-to-one interaction verification was carried out after the self-activation of yeast was inhibited by designing different AbA concentrations. The specific operation was followed Wang et al. [75].

Dual luciferase assay

The dual luciferase assay was according to Wu et al. [76]. The candidate TFs and promoter region of VvDFR / VvANS2 were constructed into the vector pGreenII 62-SK and pGreenII 0800-LUC (with Firefly luciferase reporter gene), respectively. The primers for all the constructed vectors are listed as Table S1. All the constructed vectors were transformed into Agrobacterium strain GV3101(pSoup). Nicotina benthamiana leaves were selected as the transiently expressed plant material. The enzyme activities of firefly luciferase (LUC) and Renilla luciferase (REN) were detected using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System and Modulus Luminometer (Promega, USA). The LUC /REN value of TFs on VvDFR / VvANS2 was calculated by normalization to reflect the regulatory effect of candidate TFs.

Data Availability

The raw RNA-seq data are available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA781680.

Abbreviations

ANS:

Anthocyanin synthase

UFGT:

UDP-glucose:flavonoid-3-O-glucosyltransferase

bHLH:

Basic helix-loop-helix

ERF:

Ethylene response factor

DAMs:

Differentially accumulated metabolites

KEGG:

Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes

DEGs:

Differentially expressed genes

CHS:

Chalcone synthase

CHI:

Chalcone isomerase

F3H:

Flavanone 3-hydroxylase

F3’H:

Flavanone 3′-hydroxylase

DFR:

Dihydroflavonol 4-reductase

F3’5’H:

Flavonoid 3′,5′-hydroxylase

FPKM:

Fragments per kilobase of exon model per million mapped reads

FLS:

Flavonol synthase

ANR:

Anthocyanidin reductase

LAR:

Leucoanthocyanidin reductase

Y1H:

Yeast one-hybrid

TF:

Transcription factor

References

  1. Coombe BG, Bishop GR. Development of the grape berry.2. Changes in diameter and deformability during veraison. Aust J Agr Res. 1980;31(3):499–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Agati G, Azzarello E, Pollastri S, Tattini M. Flavonoids as antioxidants in plants: location and functional significance. Plant Sci. 2012;196:67–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fuleki T, Ricardo-da-Silva JM. Catechin and procyanidin composition of seeds from grape cultivars grown in Ontario. J Agr Food Chem. 1997;45(4):1156–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ageorges A, Fernandez L, Vialet S, Merdinoglu D, Terrier N, Romieu C. Four specific isogenes of the anthocyanin metabolic pathway are systematically co-expressed with the red colour of grape berries. Plant Sci. 2006;170(2):372–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jiu S, Guan L, Leng X, Zhang K, Haider MS, Yu X, Zhu X, Zheng T, Ge M, Wang C, et al. The role of VvMYBA2r and VvMYBA2w alleles of the MYBA2 locus in the regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis for molecular breeding of grape (Vitis spp.) skin coloration. Plant Biotechnol J. 2021;19(6):1216–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Luan A, Zhang W, Yang M, Zhong Z, Wu J, He Y, He J. Unveiling the molecular mechanism involving anthocyanins in pineapple peel discoloration during fruit maturation. Food Chem. 2023;412:135482.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Petrussa E, Braidot E, Zancani M, Peresson C, Bertolini A, Patui S, Vianello A. Plant flavonoids–biosynthesis, transport and involvement in stress responses. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(7):14950–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuang L, Chen S, Guo Y, Ma H. Quantitative proteome analysis reveals changes in the protein landscape during grape berry development with a focus on vacuolar transport proteins. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:641.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Jaakola L. New insights into the regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in fruits. Trends Plant Sci. 2013;18(9):477–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kobayashi S, Goto-Yamamoto N, Hirochika H. Retrotransposon-induced mutations in grape skin color. Science. 2004;304(5673):982.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Azuma A, Kobayashi S, Mitani N, Shiraishi M, Yamada M, Ueno T, Kono A, Yakushiji H, Koshita Y. Genomic and genetic analysis of myb-related genes that regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis in grape berry skin. Theor Appl Genet. 2008;117(6):1009–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao R, Song X, Yang N, Chen L, Xiang L, Liu XQ, Zhao K. Expression of the subgroup IIIf bHLH transcription factor CpbHLH1 from Chimonanthus praecox (L.) in transgenic model plants inhibits anthocyanin accumulation. Plant Cell Rep. 2020;39(7):891–907.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Xi HC, He YJ, Chen HY. Functional characterization of SmbHLH13 in anthocyanin biosynthesis and flowering in eggplant. Hortic Plant J. 2021;7(1):73–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hichri I, Heppel SC, Pillet J, Leon C, Czemmel S, Delrot S, Lauvergeat V, Bogs J. The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor MYC1 is involved in the regulation of the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway in grapevine. Mol Plant. 2010;3(3):509–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Koyama T, Sato F. The function of ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR genes in the light-induced anthocyanin production of Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. Plant Biotechnol (Tokyo). 2018;35(1):87–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. An JP, Zhang XW, Bi SQ, You CX, Wang XF, Hao YJ. The ERF transcription factor MdERF38 promotes drought stress-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis in apple. Plant J. 2020;101(3):573–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang D, Chen L, Yang Y, Abbas F, Qin Y, Lu H, Lai B, Wu Z, Hu B, Qin Y, et al. Integrated metabolome and transcriptome analysis reveals the cause of anthocyanin biosynthesis deficiency in litchi aril. Physiol Plant. 2023;175(1):e13860.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Takos AM, Jaffe FW, Jacob SR, Bogs J, Robinson SP, Walker AR. Light-induced expression of a MYB gene regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis in red apples. Plant Physiol. 2006;142(3):1216–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Espley RV, Hellens RP, Putterill J, Stevenson DE, Kutty-Amma S, Allan AC. Red colouration in apple fruit is due to the activity of the MYB transcription factor, MdMYB10. Plant J. 2007;49(3):414–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Li B, Xia Y, Wang Y, Qin G, Tian S. Characterization of genes encoding key enzymes involved in anthocyanin metabolism of kiwifruit during storage period. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:341.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang LH, Tang W, Hu YW, Zhang YB, Sun JQ, Guo XH, Lu H, Yang Y, Fang CB, Niu XL, et al. A MYB/bHLH complex regulates tissue-specific anthocyanin biosynthesis in the inner pericarp of red-centered kiwifruit Actinidia chinensis cv. Hongyang. Plant J. 2019;99(2):359–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Xi ZM, Meng JF, Huo SS, Luan LY, Ma LN, Zhang ZW. Exogenously applied abscisic acid to Yan73 (V. vinifera) grapes enhances phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of its wine. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2013;64(4):444–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Xie S, Song C, Wang X, Liu M, Zhang Z, Xi Z. Tissue-specific expression analysis of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes in white- and red-fleshed grape cultivars. Molecules. 2015;20(12):22767–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. He JJ, Liu YX, Pan QH, Cui XY, Duan CQ. Different anthocyanin profiles of the skin and the pulp of Yan7 (Muscat Hamburg x Alicante Bouschet) grape berries. Molecules. 2010;15(3):1141–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang K, Liu Z, Guan L, Zheng T, Jiu S, Zhu X, Jia H, Fang J. Changes of anthocyanin component biosynthesis in ‘Summer Black’ grape berries after the red flesh mutation occurred. J Agric Food Chem. 2018;66(35):9209–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen WK, Wang Y, Gao XT, Yang XH, He F, Duan CQ, Wang J. Flavonoid and aromatic profiles of two Vitis vinifera L. teinturier grape cultivars. Aust J Grape Wine R. 2018;24(3):379–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Peng Y, Lin-Wang K, Cooney JM, Wang T, Espley RV, Allan AC. Differential regulation of the anthocyanin profile in purple kiwifruit (Actinidia species). Hortic Res. 2019;6:3–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Catola S, Castagna A, Santin M, Calvenzani V, Petroni K, Mazzucato A, Ranieri A. The dominant allele Aft induces a shift from flavonol to anthocyanin production in response to UV-B radiation in tomato fruit. Planta. 2017;246(2):263–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jeong ST, Goto-Yamamoto N, Hashizume K, Esaka M. Expression of the flavonoid 3 ‘-hydroxylase and flavonoid 3 ‘,5 ‘-hydroxylase genes and flavonoid composition in grape (Vitis vinifera). Plant Sci. 2006;170(1):61–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Xie DY, Jackson LA, Cooper JD, Ferreira D, Paiva NL. Molecular and biochemical analysis of two cDNA clones encoding dihydroflavonol-4-reductase from Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol. 2004;134(3):979–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Xie S, Zhao T, Zhang Z, Meng J. Reduction of dihydrokaempferol by Vitis vinfera dihydroflavonol 4-reductase to produce orange pelargonidin-type anthocyanins. J Agric Food Chem. 2018;66(13):3524–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Boss PK, Davies C, Robinson SP. Expression of anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway genes in red and white grapes. Plant Mol Biol. 1996;32(3):565–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang H, Wang W, Li H, Zhang P, Zhan J, Huang W. Expression and tissue and subcellular localization of anthocyanidin synthase (ANS) in grapevine. Protoplasma. 2011;248(2):267–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Xie S, Qiao X, Chen H, Nan H, Zhang Z. Coordinated regulation of grape berry flesh color by transcriptional activators and repressors. J Agric Food Chem. 2019;67(42):11815–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lu S, Wang J, Zhuge Y, Zhang M, Liu C, Jia H, Fang J. Integrative analyses of metabolomes and transcriptomes provide insights into flavonoid variation in grape berries. J Agric Food Chem. 2021;69(41):12354–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang J, Xu H, Wang N, Jiang S, Fang H, Zhang Z, Yang G, Wang Y, Su M, Xu L, et al. The ethylene response factor MdERF1B regulates anthocyanin and proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in apple. Plant Mol Biol. 2018;98(3):205–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. An JP, Wang XF, Li YY, Song LQ, Zhao LL, You CX, Hao YJ. EIN3-LIKE1, MYB1, and ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR3 act in a regulatory loop that synergistically modulates ethylene biosynthesis and anthocyanin accumulation. Plant Physiol. 2018;178(2):808–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Ni J, Premathilake AT, Gao Y, Yu W, Tao R, Teng Y, Bai S. Ethylene-activated PpERF105 induces the expression of the repressor-type R2R3-MYB gene PpMYB140 to inhibit anthocyanin biosynthesis in red pear fruit. Plant J. 2021;105(1):167–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Walker AR, Lee E, Bogs J, McDavid DA, Thomas MR, Robinson SP. White grapes arose through the mutation of two similar and adjacent regulatory genes. Plant J. 2007;49(5):772–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Leng F, Cao J, Ge Z, Wang Y, Zhao C, Wang S, Li X, Zhang Y, Sun C. Transcriptomic analysis of root restriction effects on phenolic metabolites during grape berry development and ripening. J Agric Food Chem. 2020;68(34):9090–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. LaFountain AM, Yuan YW. Repressors of anthocyanin biosynthesis. New Phytol. 2021;231(3):933–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Cavallini E, Matus JT, Finezzo L, Zenoni S, Loyola R, Guzzo F, Schlechter R, Ageorges A, Arce-Johnson P, Tornielli GB. The phenylpropanoid pathway is controlled at different branches by a set of R2R3-MYB C2 repressors in grapevine. Plant Physiol. 2015;167(4):1448–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Koyama K, Numata M, Nakajima I, Goto-Yamamoto N, Matsumura H, Tanaka N. Functional characterization of a new grapevine MYB transcription factor and regulation of proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in grapes. J Exp Bot. 2014;65(15):4433–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bogs J, Jaffe FW, Takos AM, Walker AR, Robinson SP. The grapevine transcription factor VvMYBPA1 regulates proanthocyanidin synthesis during fruit development. Plant Physiol. 2007;143(3):1347–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Czemmel S, Stracke R, Weisshaar B, Cordon N, Harris NN, Walker AR, Robinson SP, Bogs J. The grapevine R2R3-MYB transcription factor VvMYBF1 regulates flavonol synthesis in developing grape berries. Plant Physiol. 2009;151(3):1513–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Fursova OV, Pogorelko GV, Tarasov VA. Identification of ICE2, a gene involved in cold acclimation which determines freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene. 2009;429(1–2):98–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Yu L, Sun Y, Zhang X, Chen M, Wu T, Zhang J, Xing Y, Tian J, Yao Y. ROS1 promotes low temperature-induced anthocyanin accumulation in apple by demethylating the promoter of anthocyanin-associated genes. Hortic Res. 2022; 9.

  48. Dong NQ, Lin HX. Contribution of phenylpropanoid metabolism to plant development and plant-environment interactions. J Integr Plant Biol. 2021;63(1):180–209.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Zuo JH, Grierson D, Courtney LT, Wang YX, Gao LP, Zhao XY, Zhu BZ, Luo YB, Wang Q, Giovannoni JJ. Relationships between genome methylation, levels of non-coding RNAs, mRNAs and metabolites in ripening tomato fruit. Plant J. 2020;103(3):980–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang BH, Luo Q, Li YP, Du KX, Wu Z, Li TY, Shen WH, Huang CH, Gan JH, Dong AW. Structural insights into partner selection for MYB and bHLH transcription factor complexes. Nat Plants. 2021;8(9):1108–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhou LJ, Wang YX, Wang YG, Song AP, Jiang JF, Chen SM, Ding BQ, Guan ZY, Chen FD. Transcription factor CmbHLH16 regulates petal anthocyanin homeostasis under different lights in Chrysanthemum. Plant Physiol. 2022;190(2):1134–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Li Y, Xu PB, Chen GQ, Wu J, Liu ZC, Lian HL. FvhHLH9 functions as a positive regulator of anthocyanin biosynthesis by forming a HY5-bHLH9 transcription complex in strawberry fruits. Plant Cell Physiol. 2020;61(4):826–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lee S, Wang WL, Huq E. Spatial regulation of thermomorphogenesis by HY5 and PIF4 in Arabidopsis. Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1).

  54. Luo X, Plunkert M, Teng Z, Mackenzie K, Guo L, Luo YG, Hytonen T, Liu ZC. Two MYB activators of anthocyanin biosynthesis exhibit specialized activities in petiole and fruit of diploid strawberry. J Exp Bot. 2023;74(5):1517–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Bourbousse C, Barneche F. A dynamic signaling path to chromatin-level control of plant drought response. Mol Plant. 2019;12(3):292–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Samo N, Ebert A, Kopka J, Mozgova I. Plant chromatin, metabolism and development – an intricate crosstalk. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2021; 61.

  57. Zhao J. Flavonoid transport mechanisms: how to go, and with whom. Trends Plant Sci. 2015;20(9):576–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Perez-Diaz R, Ryngajllo M, Perez-Diaz J, Pena-Cortes H, Casaretto JA, Gonzalez-Villanueva E, Ruiz-Lara S. VvMATE1 and VvMATE2 encode putative proanthocyanidin transporters expressed during berry development in Vitis vinifera L. Plant Cell Rep. 2014;33(7):1147–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Dixon DP, Edwards R. Roles for stress-inducible lambda glutathione transferases in flavonoid metabolism in plants as identified by ligand fishing. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(47):36322–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Jaakola L, Poole M, Jones MO, Kamarainen-Karppinen T, Koskimaki JJ, Hohtola A, Haggman H, Fraser PD, Manning K, King GJ, et al. A SQUAMOSA MADS box gene involved in the regulation of anthocyanin accumulation in bilberry fruits. Plant Physiol. 2010;153(4):1619–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Maier A, Schrader A, Kokkelink L, Falke C, Welter B, Iniesto E, Rubio V, Uhrig JF, Hulskamp M, Hoecker U. Light and the E3 ubiquitin ligase COP1/SPA control the protein stability of the MYB transcription factors PAP1 and PAP2 involved in anthocyanin accumulation in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2013;74(4):638–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Li YY, Mao K, Zhao C, Zhao XY, Zhang HL, Shu HR, Hao YJ. MdCOP1 ubiquitin E3 ligases interact with MdMYB1 to regulate light-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis and red fruit coloration in apple. Plant Physiol. 2012;160(2):1011–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Henry-Kirk RA, Plunkett B, Hall M, McGhie T, Allan AC, Wargent JJ, Espley RV. Solar UV light regulates flavonoid metabolism in apple (Malus x domestica). Plant Cell Environ. 2018;41(3):675–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Bai S, Tao R, Tang Y, Yin L, Ma Y, Ni J, Yan X, Yang Q, Wu Z, Zeng Y, et al. BBX16, a B-box protein, positively regulates light-induced anthocyanin accumulation by activating MYB10 in red pear. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019;17(10):1985–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Cui Y, Zhai Y, Flaishman M, Li J, Chen S, Zheng C, Ma H. Ethephon induces coordinated ripening acceleration and divergent coloration responses in fig (Ficus carica L.) flowers and receptacles. Plant Mol Biol. 2021;105(4–5):347–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Ni J, Zhao Y, Tao R, Yin L, Gao L, Strid A, Qian M, Li J, Li Y, Shen J, et al. Ethylene mediates the branching of the jasmonate-induced flavonoid biosynthesis pathway by suppressing anthocyanin biosynthesis in red chinese pear fruits. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020;18(5):1223–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Robinson SP, Pezhmanmehr M, Speirs J, McDavid DAJ, Hooper LC, Rinaldo AR, Bogs J, Ebadi A, Walker AR. Grape and wine flavonoid composition in transgenic grapevines with altered expression of flavonoid hydroxylase genes. Aust J Grape Wine R. 2019;25(3):293–306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Chen W, Gong L, Guo ZL, Wang WS, Zhang HY, Liu XQ, Yu SB, Xiong LZ, Luo J. A novel integrated method for large-scale detection, identification, and quantification of widely targeted metabolites: application in the study of rice metabolomics. Mol Plant. 2013;6(6):1769–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Dong NQ, Sun Y, Guo T, Shi CL, Zhang YM, Kan Y, Xiang YH, Zhang H, Yang YB, Li YC, et al. UDP-glucosyltransferase regulates grain size and abiotic stress tolerance associated with metabolic flux redirection in rice. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):2629.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Sun SK, Xu X, Tang Z, Tang Z, Huang XY, Wirtz M, Hell R, Zhao FJ. A molecular switch in sulfur metabolism to reduce arsenic and enrich selenium in rice grain. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1392.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Wang Z, Song M, Wang Z, Chen S, Ma H. Metabolome and transcriptome analysis of flavor components and flavonoid biosynthesis in fig female flower tissues (Ficus carica L.) after bagging. BMC Plant Biol. 2021;21(1):396.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Canaguier A, Grimplet J, Di Gaspero G, Scalabrin S, Duchene E, Choisne N, Mohellibi N, Guichard C, Rombauts S, Le Clainche I, et al. A new version of the grapevine reference genome assembly (12X.v2) and of its annotation (VCost.v3). Genom Data. 2017;14:56–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods. 2015;12(4):357–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Varet H, Brillet-Gueguen L, Coppee JY, Dillies MA. SARTools: a DESeq2- and edger-based R pipeline for comprehensive differential analysis of RNA-Seq data. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(6):e0157022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Wang Z, Song M, Li Y, Chen S, Ma H. Differential color development and response to light deprivation of fig (Ficus carica L.) syconia peel and female flower tissues: transcriptome elucidation. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19(1):217.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Wu T, Liu HT, Zhao GP, Song JX, Wang XL, Yang CQ, Zhai R, Wang ZG, Ma FW, Xu LF. Jasmonate and ethylene-regulated ethylene response factor 22 promotes lanolin-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis in ‘Zaosu’ Pear (Pyrusbretschneideri Rehd.) fruit. Biomolecules. 2020; 10(2).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was financially supported by 111 Project (B17043) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2022M723425). The funding bodies played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HM and MS designed the experiments, RL and MS prepared the samples for RNA-seq, RL completed the physiological experiments and qRT-PCR, RL and MS completed all data collation and analysis, RL, MS, HM, ZW, YZ, CH and AP wrote and revised the article. All authors have read and approved the manuscript for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huiqin Ma.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Plant experimental research, including the collection of plant materials, in accordance with relevant institutional, national and international guidelines and legislation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

12870_2023_4368_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx

Supplementary Material 1: Table S1: Primer sequences for genes used in assays in this study. Table S2: List of metabolites detected and quantified in the skin and flesh of ‘Mio Red’ grape. Table S3: List of metabolites differentially accumulated in the skin and flesh of ‘Mio red’ grape. Table S4: Relative contents of the 6 anthocyanin derivatives identified in the skin and flesh of ‘Mio Red’ grape. Table S5: Quality check of the raw data from the RNA-seq. Table S6: Overview of transcriptome sequencing dataset and mapping statistics of ‘Mio Red’ grape. Table S7: Expression profile (FPKM values) of the 23,786 genes detected in the skin and flesh of ‘Mio Red’ grape. Table S8: Identification of structural genes in flavonoid-biosynthesis pathway of ‘Mio Red’ grape. Table S9: GenBank accession numbers of the transcription factors in the phylogenetic tree analysis.

12870_2023_4368_MOESM2_ESM.pptx

Supplementary Material 2: Fig. S1 Flavonoid metabolomes in the skin and flesh of ‘Mio Red’. (a) Correlation diagram between samples. (b) Principal component analysis score chart based on mass spectrum data of samples. Mix indicates control sample. (c) Hierarchical clustering heatmap based on flavonoid metabolite profiles in the skin and flesh of ‘Mio Red’ grape. Fig. S2: (a) Volcano plots of differentially abundant metabolites between ‘Mio Red’ grape skin and flesh. (b) KEGG enrichment of the differentially abundant metabolites. Fig. S3: Network of flavonoid-related genes (blue) and metabolites (red) in ‘Mio Red’ grape. There are 4 KEGG pathways: flavonoid biosynthesis, flavone and flavonol biosynthesis, anthocyanin biosynthesis and isoflavone biosynthesis. Fig. S4: Dual luciferase (LUC) assay of MYB3 and promoter of VvDFR and VvANS2.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, R., Song, M., Wang, Z. et al. Independent flavonoid and anthocyanin biosynthesis in the flesh of a red-fleshed table grape revealed by metabolome and transcriptome co-analysis. BMC Plant Biol 23, 361 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04368-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04368-8

Keywords