Skip to main content
Download PDF

The effect of LED light quality on the carotenoid metabolism and related gene expression in the genus Brassica

BMC Plant Biology volume 23, Article number: 328 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

New vegetable production systems, such as vertical farming, but also well-established in-door production methods led to the implementation of light emitting diodes (LEDs). LEDs are the most important light sources in modern indoor-production systems and offer the possibility for enhancing growth and specific metabolites in planta. Even though the number of studies investigating the effects of LED lighting on vegetable quality has increased, the knowledge about genus variability is limited. In the present study, the effect of different LED spectra on the metabolic and transcriptional level of the carotenoid metabolism in five different Brassica sprouts was investigated. Cruciferous vegetables are one of the main food crops worldwide. Pak choi (Brassica rapa ssp. chinensis), cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis), Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis), green kale (Brassica oleracea ssp. sabellica) and turnip cabbage (Brassica oleracea spp. gongylodes) sprouts were grown under a combination of blue & white LEDs, red & white LEDs or only white LEDs to elucidate the genus-specific carotenoid metabolism.

Results

Genus-specific changes in plant weight and on the photosynthetic pigment levels as well as transcript levels have been detected. Interestingly, the transcript levels of the three investigated carotenoid biosynthesis genes phytoene synthase (PSY), β-cyclase (βLCY) and β-carotene hydroxylase (βOHASE1) were increased under the combination of blue & white LEDs in the majority of the Brassica sprouts. However, only in pak choi, the combination of blue & white LEDs enhanced the carotenoid levels by 14% in comparison to only white LEDs and by ~ 19% in comparison to red & white LEDs.

Conclusions

The effects of light quality differ within a genus which leads to the conclusion that production strategies have to be developed for individual species and cultivars to fully benefit from LED technology.

Peer Review reports

Background

The consumer demand for high quality vegetables containing health-promoting compounds, but also current and future challenges such as climate change or land and water shortage, led to the development of new vegetable production systems, such as vertical farming. These systems need artificial lighting due to a limited access to natural light. Light emitting diodes (LEDs), which are considered the future of greenhouse lighting [1], offer the advantage of the availability of LEDs emitting specific wavelengths that can optimize the quantum yield of photosynthesis [2], and in addition, can enhance the vegetable quality by influencing the contents of secondary plant compounds determining flavour, colour and health-promoting properties [3]. However, many studies focus on metabolite profiles, whereas the effects and regulatory mechanisms by which specific wavelength affect secondary compounds in various vegetables are not well understood.

Carotenoids are plant pigments belonging to the secondary plant compounds [4], have health-promoting effects in humans [5], and thus, are important for vegetable quality. Carotenoid intake and their concentrations in the body have been correlated with the reduced incidence of chronic diseases, such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and several types of cancer [6]. A major source for carotenoids are green leafy vegetables [6]. The carotenoid biosynthesis is well-known (Fig. 1), however, the regulatory mechanisms determining the contents in vegetables are insufficiently described. In green tissues, carotenoids play a crucial role in photosynthesis [4]. Besides a manipulation of temperature, light regimes during vegetable growth can lead to altered levels [7]. There is only limited knowledge about the underlying mechanisms which specific wavelengths influence the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway in green tissues. Different photo-regulatory mechanisms by photoreceptors [8, 9], the circadian clock [10,11,12] and an imbalance in the excitation of the photosystems which activates redox control mechanisms [13, 14] are involved in the regulation of the carotenoid metabolism. Light-activated cryptochromes (regulated by blue light) inhibit the COP1-based ubiquitin-ligase and thus rescue the HY5 transcription factor from proteolysis and phytochromes (regulated by red light) inhibit PIF1 transcription factor. Both processes regulate the phytoene synthase (PSY), the first and main rate-determining enzyme in the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway. The excitation of the photosystems by light intensity and quality is regulated through changes of pH-values inside the lumen and the balance of the ratio of reduced and oxidised plastoquinones [15]. This regulates the upper part of the carotenoid biosynthetic pathway and enhances the biosynthesis under blue light as well as the β-carotene hydroxylase (βOHASE) in pak choi [16]. Even though the regulation mechanism are poorly understood the transcripts of the β-cyclase βLCY and the carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 4 (CCD4) are enhanced by blue light in pak choi too [16].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Carotenoid biosynthesis pathway in plants (dashed line: > 1 reaction; continuous line: 1 reaction; GGPP: geranylgeranyl diphosphate; CYP97A3: cytochrome P450 97A3; CYP97C1: cytochrome P450 97C1; βLCY: β-cyclase; εLCY: ε-cyclase; β-OHASE1: β-carotene hydroxylase 1; PDS: phytoene desaturase; PSY: phytoene synthase; VDE: violaxanthin de-epoxidase; ZEP: zeaxanthin epoxidase

Full size image

There have been some studies investigating the effect of specific wavelengths on carotenoids in green, leafy vegetables. In lettuce (Lactuca sativa ‘Banchu Red Fire’ or ‘Red Cross’) and sprouting broccoli, blue light increased the carotenoid levels [17,18,19]. In another study, total carotenoid levels were highest under blue fluorescent lamps in spinach (Spinacia oleracea ‘Okame’), but they were enhanced under white and red fluorescent lamps in lettuce (Lactuca sativa ‘Redfire’) and under white fluorescent lamps in Komatsuna (Brassica campestris ‘Komatsuna’) [20]. On the other hand, slightly higher carotenoid quantities were measured under only white LEDs in comparison to only blue LED or only red LEDs [10], whereas the combination of blue & white LEDs led to significant higher carotenoid levels in pak choi [16].This is interesting since it demonstrates that blue light alone is not sufficient to increase carotenoid levels and shows that other wavelengths of the visual light spectrum in addition to blue light are essential for carotenoid enrichment in pak choi. Thus, the influence of different light qualities on carotenoid concentrations differs between vegetables. Hence, the question arises if wavelength effects are conserved within the same genus. The genus Brassica contains economically important crops such as cabbage, cauliflower, broccoli, kale or pak choi leading to a worldwide production of 71 million tonnes Brassica vegetables in 2020 [21]. In this study, sprouts of five Brassica vegetables were further investigated. Sprouts are harvested and consumed in a stage of expanded cotyledons, are rich in health-beneficial micronutrients and are culinary appreciated because of their taste and colour [22].

In summary, for the production of vegetables rich in carotenoids, the effect of specific wavelength during the growth on carotenoids has to be determined. Therefore, the objective of this study was to quantify the impact of different LED spectra (white or a combination of white & blue or white & red) on the carotenoid metabolism and to clarify if a general recommendation for light regimes of vegetables belonging to the same genus can be made by (1) determining the fresh and dry weight, (2) qualitative and quantitative analysis of the photosynthetic pigments and (3) determining the transcripts of key enzymes of the carotenoid biosynthesis and degradation.

Materials and methods

Plant material

Five different sprouts belonging to the genus Brassica were investigated: pak choi (Brassica rapa ssp. chinensis ‘White Celery Mustard’), cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis ‘Neckarperle’), Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis ‘Michihili’), green kale (Brassica oleracea ssp. sabellica ‘Ostfriesische Palme’) and turnip cabbage (Brassica oleracea spp. gongylodes ‘Delikatess Weißer’) (seed supplier: see Additional file 1). The sprouts were similarly cultivated as previously described in June and July 2020 [10]: Aluminium foil trays (ø ~10 cm) were filled with wet perlite. One gram of seeds per tray (corresponds to 1 replicate) was sown on a wet cellulose cloth which was placed onto the perlite. The seeds were sprayed frequently with water to avoid drying out.

Growth conditions

The sprouts were grown in darkness for 4 days (25 °C, 75% air humidity). Subsequently, the sprouts were transferred to a growth chamber (25 °C, 75% air humidity) equipped with blue & white (λmax 453 nm), red & white (λmax 633 nm) or only white (λ 404–789 nm) LEDs. The light spectrum of the white LEDs was adjusted with a filter to reduce the amount of blue light and balance the blue and red light [10]. The spectra of the LEDs were analysed with an EPP2000 StellarNet spectrometer (StellarNet, Tampa, FL, USA). The presented LED spectra measured beneath the filter are the means of 3 measuring spots (Fig. 2). The photoperiod in the growth chamber was 12 h (05:00–17:00 h). The photosynthetic active radiation was 90 µmol m− 2 s− 1 for each light treatment (LI-250 Light Meter, LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA). Sprouts were grown for 7 days under the different light spectra and were watered daily. To optimize the uniformity of light treatment, the trays were rotated every day. On day 7 of light treatment, the sprouts were harvested at 09:00 h with 4 biological replicates per LED treatment.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Spectral distribution of (a) white, (b) blue & white and (c) red & white LEDs with filter used in the experiments

Full size image

Sample preparation

In detail, the sprouts of one tray were cut above the perlite surface (cotyledons and hypocotyl) and pooled for 1 replicate. These samples were weighed for fresh mass analysis, frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C. Two independent experiments (I, II) were performed. For further analysis, the frozen samples were ground to a fine powder under liquid nitrogen. Part of the sample was freeze-dried and carotenoids were analysed using this dried material.

Dry matter content

The samples were dried in a drying oven at 103 °C until mass constancy. The dry matter content (DMC) was calculated as dry matter per fresh mass in percent.

Determination of transcripts by RT-qPCR analysis

The primers were designed based on the sequence information available in the Brassica database BRAD (http://brassicadb.org/brad/) (primer pair sequences: see Additional file 1). Total RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis and RT-qPCR was performed as described in Frede et al. [10]. Gene expression was calculated as n-fold induction of the gene of interest in sprouts grown under blue & white or red & white LEDs in comparison to sprouts grown under only white LEDs by the ΔΔCq method using the geometric mean of three reference genes (actin 2, ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 30 and elongation factor 1-alpha) [23, 24].

Analysis of carotenoids and chlorophylls by LC-ToF-MS

Carotenoids and chlorophylls were extracted and measured as previously described [25]. The separation and detection were performed on a C30 column on an Agilent Technologies 1290 Infinity UHPLC and an Agilent Technologies 6230 TOF LC/MS. External calibration was performed using authentic reference compounds.

Statistical analyses

SigmaPlot 14.0 (Systat, Erkrath, Germany) was used for statistics. Treatment differences related to LED irradiation by white, white & blue or white & red light were analysed using the one-way ANOVA/Tukey HSD post hoc test for each Brassica genus. If the assumption of variance homogeneity or normality distribution were violated, the Kruskal–Wallis-test was applied.

Results

Fresh mass and dry matter content

The fresh mass and the dry matter content were determined in the five different Brassica sprouts after growth under the LED treatments. No significant effects of the light quality could be determined in the vast majority of samples that could be confirmed in the repetition experiment (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

(a) Fresh mass (FM) and (b) dry matter content (DMC) in different Brassica sprouts grown under different light-emitting diode (LED) lamp spectra Sprouts were germinated in darkness for 4 days. Subsequently, the sprouts were grown under white (W) LEDs, blue & white (B/W) LEDs or red & white (R/W) LEDs, and were harvested on day 7 of LED treatment. The DMC was determined as dry matter per fresh mass in percent. Values are presented as mean ± SD (n = 4). Significant differences for each genus are indicated by * (p ≤ 0.05). (I: first experiment; II: repetition experiment)

Full size image

Blue light increases the transcription of carotenoid biosynthesis genes

In all five Brassica spouts, the transcript levels of three carotenoid biosynthesis and one degradation gene under different light qualities were determined as n-fold expression of the expression in sprouts grown under only white LEDs (Fig. 4). The four genes were chosen since they cover different steps of the carotenoid metabolism (see Fig. 1), such as the first biosynthesis step (phytoene synthase), cyclisation (β-cyclase), hydroxylation (β-carotene hydroxylase 1) and degradation (carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 4), and in addition, these genes were previously shown to react to different light qualities [10]. In the first experiment and confirmed in the repetition experiment, the expression of phytoene synthase (PSY) significantly increased in three out of five investigated Brassica sprouts after growth under blue & white LEDs in comparison to light spectra with lower blue light percentage, either only white LEDs or red & white LEDs. In pak choi, cauliflower and turnip cabbage, the PSY transcript levels were enhanced by ~ 1.2-1.6-fold, whereas in Chinese cabbage the induction of PSY under blue & white LEDs was significant only in the first experiment (increased by 1.9 ± 0.4-fold) and there were no significant effects in kale. A similar observation was made for β-cyclase (βLCY). Its expression was enhanced by 1.1-1.7-fold by blue & white LEDs in pak choi, cauliflower and turnip cabbage. In kale, blue & white LEDs significantly increased βLCY transcript levels only in the repetition experiment (1.4 ± 0.1-fold), while a combination of red & white LEDs significantly reduced the levels to 0.7 ± 0.1 -fold in the first experiment and to 0.8 ± 0.0-fold in the repetition experiment. For β-carotene hydroxylase 1 (βOHASE1), blue & white LEDs also increased the expression by 1.4-1.9-fold in pak choi, cauliflower and turnip cabbage. In kale, red & white LEDs significantly reduced the levels to 0.7 ± 0.1-fold in comparison to only white LEDs in the first experiment, while blue & white LEDs led to a significant rise of 1.4 ± 0.2-fold in the repetition experiment. In summary, all three carotenoid biosynthesis genes showed an increase in transcription in the majority of the investigated Brassica sprouts when the blue light percentage was increased. However, regarding the degrading enzyme carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 4 (CCD4), no clear results were observed which could be confirmed in the repetition experiment.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Relative transcript levels of (a)  PSY, (b)  βLCY, (c)   βOHASE1 and (d) CCD4 grown under different light-emitting diode (LED) lamp spectra. Sprouts were germinated in darkness for 4 days. Subsequently, they were grown under white (W) LEDs, blue & white (B/W) LEDs or red & white (R/W) LEDs. The sprouts were harvested on day 7 of LED treatment. The RNA transcript levels were determined by RT-qPCR analysis. The gene expression was calculated as n-fold of the expression in sprouts grown under only white LEDs by the ΔΔCq method. Values are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3–4). Significant differences for each genus are indicated by * (p ≤ 0.05). (I: first experiment; II: repetition experiment, PSY: phytoene synthase, βLCY: β-cyclase; β-OHASE1: β-carotene hydroxylase 1, CCD4 carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 4)

Full size image

Carotenoid and chlorophyll profiles in Brassica sprouts after growth under different light qualities

The average total carotenoid levels ranged from ~ 600 ng/mg DM in pak choi to ~ 1300 ng/mg DM in cauliflower, while the average total chlorophyll levels ranged from ~ 5000 ng/mg DM in pak choi to ~ 10,000 ng/mg DM in cauliflower (Fig. 5). Only in pak choi a significant effect of the light quality on total carotenoid and chlorophyll levels could be detected. In detail, the combination of blue & white LEDs enhanced the total carotenoid levels by ~ 14% in comparison to only white LEDs and by ~ 19% in comparison to red & white LEDs. In regard to the total chlorophyll levels, the values increased by ~ 10% and ~ 17% under blue & white LEDs in comparison to only white or red & white LEDs, respectively.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Total (a) carotenoid (TotCaro) and (b) chlorophyll (TotChl) levels in Brassica sprouts grown under different light-emitting diode (LED) lamp spectra. Sprouts were germinated in darkness for 4 days. Subsequently, they were grown under white (W) LEDs, blue & white (B/W) LEDs or red & white (R/W) LEDs. The sprouts were harvested on day 7 of LED treatment. Carotenoids and chlorophylls were measured by LC-ToF-MS analysis. Values are presented as mean ± SD (n = 4). Significant differences for each genus are indicated by * (p ≤ 0.05). (I: first experiment; II: repetition experiment)

Full size image

The individual compounds that could be detected in all Brassica sprouts were lutein, β-carotene, neoxanthin and violaxanthin as well as chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b, while α-carotene was found in Chinese cabbage, kale and turnip cabbage (Fig. 6, see Additional file 1). The two dominant carotenoids were lutein and β-carotene, and regarding the chlorophylls, chlorophyll a was the main compound. The dominant carotenoids and the chlorophylls are shown in Fig. 6. Only for pak choi a significant increase in β-carotene and chlorophyll a was shown under blue & white LEDs in comparison to light spetra with lower blue percentage in both experiments.

Fig. 6
figure 6

(a) Lutein (Lut), (b) β-carotene (βCar), (c) chlorophyll a (Chl a) and (d) chlorophyll b (Chl b) levels in Brassica sprouts grown under different light-emitting diode (LED) lamp spectra. Sprouts were germinated in darkness for 4 days. Subsequently, they were grown under white (W) LEDs, blue & white (B/W) LEDs or red & white (R/W) LEDs. The sprouts were harvested on day 7 of LED treatment. Carotenoids and chlorophylls were measured by LC-ToF-MS analysis. Values are presented as mean ± SD (n = 4). Significant differences for each genus are indicated by * (p ≤ 0.05). (I: first experiment; II: repetition experiment)

Full size image

Discussion

For the optimization of plant growth and of phytochemical profiles in high quality vegetables, the effects of specific wavelengths on the metabolism have to be investigated more thoroughly. In that regard, the observation was made that the carotenoid metabolism differs in its regulation in photosynthetically active and non-active tissues [26]. Therefore, the results of the present study are discussed by comparing them to studies performed in green tissues.

The fresh mass and the DMC were not influenced by the light quality in the different Brassica sprouts or the results were different between the first and second trial for cauliflower. Thus, neither a higher blue nor a higher red percentage of light negatively affected the yield. In other studies, the light quality influenced the fresh and dry mass indicating a species dependent effect. For example, in lettuce (Lactuca sativa ‘Banchu Red Fire’, Lactuca sativa ‘Red Cross’), red light enhanced the fresh mass in comparison to blue LEDs [17, 18]. In the lettuce (Lactuca sativa) cultivar ‘Outredgeous’, additional green LEDs combined with white background LEDs increased the fresh mass 21 days after sowing, while after 28 days after sowing, the combination red plus white LEDs enhanced the fresh mass [27]. Regarding dry mass, Goins et al. [28] presented an increase of shoot dry matter in wheat plants when combining red and blue light in comparison to only red light 40 days after planting. In soybean seedlings, plants exposed to red LEDs showed a smaller plant dry mass in comparison to seedlings exposed to only blue LEDs or to blue combined with red LEDs [29]. Perhaps negative effects of blue light on growth for instance due to reduced cell elongation are not decisive at this developmental stage. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the full potential of LED technology to increase plant yield in respect of developmental stage as well as plant gener aand plant species.

The main goal of the experiments was to investigate how the white light spectrum in comparison to a combination white & blue or white & red light influences the metabolic processes related to carotenoids. The RNA transcripts of four genes were analyzed, three of them coding for carotenoid biosynthetic enzymes and the fourth for a carotenoid catabolic enzyme. For all biosynthesis genes, namely PSY, βLCY and βOHASE1, a higher blue percentage of the light spectrum increased their transcripts in the majority of the sprouts. The transcripts of CCD4 were not affected by the light quality. CCD4 is an enzyme that is very likely involved in the carotenoid turnover in leaves [30, 31]. However, it was shown in the pak choi cultivar ‘Black Behi’ that the transcription can be influenced by the light quality and shows a diurnal pattern with a peak during the light period [10]. It might be that the point of time for sampling was too early during the light period and that a change could have been determined at a later time point in the investigated species. An enhanced transcription of carotenoid biosynthesis genes was also described in other studies. PSY is a key and rate-limiting step in carotenoid biosynthesis and is related to carotenoid accumulation induced by changes in light regimes. In line with the findings of this study, the number transcripts of PSY were lower under red compared to blue and white light as a single light quality or in combination with white light in pak choi ‘Black Behi’ [10, 13, 16]. The results indicate an involvement of a transcriptional regulation of PSY, since red light regulates phytochrome interacting factors such as PIF1 which acts as transcriptional repressor of PSY, while elongated hypocotyl 5 (HY5) acts as transcriptional activator under blue light [7]. In the study of Alrifei et al. [32], enhancing amber and blue light increased the transcription of PSY and εLCY in Brassica microgreens. However, a conclusion about the individual effects of each wavelength cannot be drawn since the light intensities of the two wavelengths were always changed together. In pak choi sprouts of the cultivar ‘Black Behi’, monochromatic blue LEDs induced not only the transcripts of PSY, but also of PDS, βLCY, εLCY, cytochrome P450 97A3 (CYP97A3), cytochrome P450 97C1 (CYP97C1), βOHASE1, ZEP, VDE and CCD4, while monochromatic red LEDs decreased them compared to LEDs emitting white light [10]. The cyclisation by βLCY and the hydroxylation by βOHASE1 is not only favoured by monochromatic blue LEDs, but also by its combination with white as shown for pak choi [16] and here in this study for the different Brassicaceae sprouts (pak choi, cauliflower and turnip cabbage). Thus, it seems that in accordance to literature blue light increases the carotenoid biosynthetic rate in the genus Brassica although this genus is known for its high level of genetic variability [33].

The cultivation under all three different LED treatments led to carotenoid amounts which were similar to levels found in field- or greenhouse-grown vegetables under natural light. In detail, the measured total carotenoid levels ranged from ~ 600 ng/mg DM in pak choi sprouts to ~ 1300 ng/mg DM in cauliflower sprouts. A study conducted in Taiwan with 35 pak choi cultivars presented levels of 440–1110 ng/mg DM during the wet season which was comparable to our growth conditions [34]. In a study conducted with eleven Chinese cabbage cultivars, the total carotenoids levels ranged from 289 to 1001 ng/mg DM [35]. An investigation of 30 kale cultivars found a natural variation of carotenoid amounts of 500–3000 ng/mg DM [33]. These results demonstrated that LED light sources are suitable for carotenoid-rich vegetable production. A further increase could possibly also achieved by special LED light regimes such as sequential light programs [36].

In regard to effects of the light quality on the carotenoid metabolism, only pak choi showed elevated carotenoid amounts under blue & white LEDs which correlated well with transcript levels of the carotenoid biosynthetic genes and the chlorophyll levels. Due to their key role in photosynthesis [4], carotenoids and chlorophylls have to be interrelated which shows in the co-expression of photosynthesis-related and carotenoid biosynthesis genes [12, 14, 37]. Also other studies showed that blue light has the ability to increase carotenoids and other metabolites in leafy vegetables, e.g. in broccoli or kohlrabi [19, 38]. The capability of carotenoids to absorb blue light [39] enables the plant to increase its photosynthesis under blue light, and in addition, protects the plant against this high energy light. In spinach, lettuce, basil and kale, a higher blue light percentage when red and blue LEDs were used together increased the carotenoids more than monochromatic red light [40]. In another study, combining red and blue LEDs or white and blue LEDs instead of using white LEDs alone increased the lutein levels in lettuce (Lactuca sativa ‘Outredgeous’) [27]. In spinach (Spinacia oleracea ‘Okame’) as well as in further lettuce cultivars (Lactuca sativa ‘Red Cross’ and ‘Banchu Red Fire’), blue plus white light or white followed by blue light led to higher carotenoids [17, 18, 20]. However, total carotenoid amounts were enhanced when white plus red light was used for growth of ‘Redfire’ (Lactuca sativa), and when ‘Komatsuna’ (Brassica campestris) was cultivated under white light [20]. In the other four Brassicaceae sprouts namely, cauliflower, Chinese cabbage, kale and turnip, carotenoid levels were the same under the different light regimes indicating different post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms. In line with our study a genus-specific effect in  Brassica microgreens was shown for kohlrabi, Mizuna and mustard [22]. Different mechanisms are known in other species such as posttranscriptional regulation of PSY involving phytochrome photoreceptors or changes in the localization of PSY [41]. In order to shed light on posttranscriptional mechanisms on carotenoid accumulation, it is essential to analyze protein levels and enzyme activities in future research.

Conclusions

Overall, the study demonstrated that Brassica species respond to light qualities and the response may vary for individual species and cultivars. The results also demonstrate that Brassicaceae sprouts can be produced in controlled environments with comparable quality to outdoor grown vegetables. In addition, the study demonstrated that the transcription of carotenoid biosynthesis genes was increased by the combination of blue & white LEDs in most Brassica sprouts, namely in pak choi, cauliflower and turnip cabbage. Surprisingly, this only led to increased carotenoid levels in pak choi. Thus, the responses in carotenoid metabolism to different light qualities are species dependent and measuring the transpiration rate, stomatal conductance and RuBIOSCO activity as well as elucidating the posttranscriptional regulations should help to identify further mechanisms regarding the genus-specific reaction. Hence, no general recommendation for the spectral composition for the Brassica genus can be given. The underlying mechanisms defining the carotenoid levels have to be investigated in more detail.

Data Availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

Abbreviations

B/W:

blue & white LEDs

βCar:

β-carotene

CCD4:

carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 4

Chl a:

chlorophyll a

Chl b:

chlorophyll b

CYP97A3:

cytochrome P450 97A3

CYP97C1:

cytochrome P450 97C1

DMC:

dry matter content

FM:

fresh mass

GGPP:

geranylgeranyl diphosphate

βLCY:

β-cyclase

εLCY:

ε-cyclase

LED:

light emitting diode

Lut:

lutein

βOHASE:

β-carotene hydroxylase

PDS:

phytoene desaturase

PSY:

phytoene synthase

R/W:

red & white LEDs

TotCaro:

total carotenoids

TotChl:

total chlorophylls

VDE:

violaxanthin de-epoxidase

ZEP:

zeaxanthin epoxidase

W:

white LEDs

References

  1. Mitchell CA, Both A-J, Bourget CM, Burr JF, Kubota C, Lopez RG, Morrow RC, Runkle ES. LEDs: the future of greenhouse lighting! Chronica Horticulturae. 2012;52:5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  2. McCree KJ. Action spectrum, absorptance and quantum yield of photosynthesis in crop plants. J Agri Meteorol. 1972;9:191–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hasan MM, Bashir T, Ghosh R, Lee SK, Bae H. An overview of LEDs’ effects on the production of bioactive compounds and crop quality. Molecules. 2017;22(9):E1420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cazzonelli CI. Goldacre Review: Carotenoids in nature: insights from plants and beyond. Funct Plant Biol. 2011;38(11):833–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fiedor J, Burda K. Potential role of carotenoids as antioxidants in human health and disease. Nutrients. 2014;6(2):466–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Böhm V, Lietz G, Olmedilla-Alonso B, Phelan D, Reboul E, Bánati D, Borel P, Corte-Real J, de Lera AR, Desmarchelier C, et al. From carotenoid intake to carotenoid blood and tissue concentrations – implications for dietary intake recommendations. Nutr Rev. 2021;79(5):544–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Harbart V, Frede K, Fitzner M, Baldermann S. Regulation of carotenoid and flavonoid biosynthetic pathways in Lactuca sativa var capitate L. in protected cultivation. Front Plant Sci. 2023, 14.

  8. von Lintig J, Welsch R, Bonk M, Giuliano G, Batschauer A, Kleinig H. Light-dependent regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis occurs at the level of phytoene synthase expression and is mediated by phytochrome in Sinapis alba and Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings. Plant J. 1997;12:625–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Toledo-Ortiz G, Johansson H, Lee KP, Bou-Torrent J, Stewart K, Steel G, Rodriguez-Concepcion M, Halliday KJ. The HY5-PIF regulatory module coordinates light and temperature control of photosynthetic gene transcription. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(6):e1004416.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Frede K, Schreiner M, Zrenner R, Graefe J, Baldermann S. Carotenoid biosynthesis of pak choi (Brassica rapa ssp. chinensis) sprouts grown under different light-emitting diodes during the diurnal course. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2018;17:1289–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Loivamäki M, Louis S, Cinege G, Zimmer I, Fischbach RJ, Schnitzler JP. Circadian rhythms of isoprene biosynthesis in grey poplar leaves. Plant Physiol. 2007;143(1):540–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Thompson AJ, Jackson AC, Parker RA, Morpeth DR, Burbidge A, Taylor IB. Abscisic acid biosynthesis in tomato: regulation of zeaxanthin epoxidase and 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase mRNAs by light/dark cycles, water stress and abscisic acid. Plant Mol Biol. 2000;42:833–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Frede K, Schreiner M, Baldermann S. Light quality-induced changes of carotenoid composition in pak choi (Brassica rapa ssp. chinensis). J Photochem Photobiol B: Biol. 2019;193:18–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Woitsch S, Römer S. Expression of xanthophyll biosynthetic genes during light-dependent chloroplast differentiation. Plant Physiol. 2003;132(3):1508–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kochetova GV, Avercheva OV, Bassarskaya EM, Zhigalova TV. Light quality as a driver of photosynthetic apparatus development. Biophys Rev. 2022;14(4):779–803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Frede K, Baldermann S. Accumulation of carotenoids in Brassica rapa ssp. chinensis by a high proportion of blue in the light spectrum. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2022, (11):1947–59.

  17. Johkan M, Shoji K, Goto F, Hashida S-n, Yoshihara T. Blue light-emitting diode light irradiation of seedlings improves seedling quality and growth after transplanting in red leaf lettuce. Hort Science. 2010;45(12):1809–14.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Li Q, Kubota C. Effects of supplemental light quality on growth and phytochemicals of baby leaf lettuce. Environ Exp Bot. 2009;67(1):59–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kopsell DA, Sams CE. Increases in shoot tissue pigments, glucosinolates, and mineral elements in sprouting broccoli after exposure to short-duration blue light from light emitting diodes. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2013;138(1):31–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ohashi-Kaneko K, Takase M, Kon N, Fujiwara K, Kurata K. Effect of light quality on growth and vegetable quality in leaf lettuce, spinach and komatsuna. Environ Control Biol. 2007;45(3):189–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. FAOSTAT. 2020 [https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL].

  22. Craver JK, Gerovac JR, Lopez RG, Kopsell DA. Light intensity and light quality from sole-source light-emitting diodes impact phytochemical concentrations within Brassica microgreens. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2017;142(1):3–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002, 3(7).

  24. Pfaffl MW. Quantification strategies in real-time PCR. In: A-Z of quantitative PCR. Edited by Bustin SA. La Jolla, CA, USA: IUL Biotechnol. Ser.; 2004: 87–112.

  25. Schmiedeskamp A, Schreiner M, Baldermann S. Impact of cultivar selection and thermal processing by air drying, air frying, and deep frying on the carotenoid content and stability and antioxidant capacity in carrots (Daucus carota L). J Agric Food Chem. 2022;70(5):1629–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Maass D, Arango J, Wust F, Beyer P, Welsch R. Carotenoid crystal formation in Arabidopsis and carrot roots caused by increased phytoene synthase protein levels. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(7):e6373.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Mickens MA, Skoog EJ, Reese LE, Barnwell PL, Spencer LE, Massa GD, Wheeler RM. A strategic approach for investigating light recipes for ‘Outredgeous’ red romaine lettuce using white and monochromatic LEDs. Life Sci Space Res. 2018;19:53–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Goins GD, Yorio NC, Sanwo MM, Brown CS. Photomorphogenesis, photosynthesis, and seed yield of wheat plants grown under red light-emitting diodes (LEDs) with and without supplemental blue lighting. J Exp Bot. 1997;48(312):1407–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fang L, Ma Z, Wang Q, Nian H, Ma Q, Huang Q, Mu Y. Plant growth and photosynthetic characteristics of soybean seedlings under different LED lighting quality conditions. J Plant Growth Regul. 2021;40:668–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gonzalez-Jorge S, Ha SH, Magallanes-Lundback M, Gilliland LU, Zhou A, Lipka AE, Nguyen YN, Angelovici R, Lin H, Cepela J, et al. Carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase4 is a negative regulator of beta-carotene content in Arabidopsis seeds. Plant Cell. 2013;25(12):4812–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lätari K, Wüst F, Hübner M, Schaub P, Beisel KG, Matsubara S, Beyer P, Welsch R. Tissue-specific apocarotenoid glycosylation contributes to carotenoid homeostasis in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Physiol. 2015;168(4):1550–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Alrifai O, Hao X, Liu R, Lu Z, Marcone MF, Tsao R. LED-induced carotenoid synthesis and related gene expression in Brassica microgreens. J Agric Food Chem. 2021;69(16):4674–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mageney V, Baldermann S, Albach DC. Intraspecific variation in carotenoids of Brassica oleracea var. Sabellica. J Agric Food Chem. 2016;64(16):3251–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hanson P, Yang R-y, Chang L-c, Ledesma L, Ledesma D. Contents of caroteniods, ascorbic acid, minerals and total glucosinolates in leafy brassica pak choi (Brassica rapa L. chinensis) as affected by season and variety. J Sci Food Agric. 2009;89(5):906–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Chun JH, Kim NH, Seo MS, Jin M, Park SU, Arasu MV, Kim SJ, Al-Dhabi NA. Molecular characterization of glucosinolates and carotenoid biosynthetic genes in chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis). Saudi J Biol Sci. 2018;25(1):71–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Carvalho SD, Folta KM. Sequential light programs shape kale (Brassica napus) sprout appearance and alter metabolic and nutrient content. Hortic Res. 2014;1(1):8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Stange C, Flores C. Carotenoids and photosynthesis - regulation of carotenoid biosyntesis by photoreceptors. In: Advances in photosynthesis – Fundamental aspects. Edited by Najafpour M. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech; 2012: 77–96.

  38. Sathasivam R, Park SU, Kim JK, Park YJ, Kim MC, Nguyen BV, Lee SY. Metabolic profiling of primary and secondary metabolites in kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes) sprouts exposed to different light-emitting diodes. Plants. 2023;12(6):1296.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Britton G, Liaaen-Jensen S, Pfander H. Carotenoids - Handbook. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser Verlag; 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. Naznin MT, Lefsrud M, Gravel V, Azad MOK. Blue light added with red LEDs enhance growth characteristics, pigments content, and antioxidant capacity in lettuce, spinach, kale, basil, and sweet pepper in a controlled environment. Plants. 2019;8(4):93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Shumskaya M, Bradbury LMT, Monaco RR, Wurtzel ET. Plastid localization of the key carotenoid enzyme phytoene synthase is altered by isozyme, allelic variation, and activity. Plant Cell. 2012;24(9):3725–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank I. Hauschild, A. Maikath and A. Platalla for their excellent technical assistance.

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Leibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Plant Quality and Food Security, Theodor-Echtermeyer-Weg 1, 14979, Großbeeren, Germany

    Katja Frede, Sara Winkelmann, Linda Busse & Susanne Baldermann

  2. University of Bayreuth; Faculty of Life Sciences: Food, Nutrition & Health; Professorship for Food Metabolome, Fritz-Hornschuch-Straße 13, 95326, Kulmbach, Germany

    Susanne Baldermann

Authors
  1. Katja Frede
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sara Winkelmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Linda Busse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Susanne Baldermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KF, SB, SW and LB contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by KF, SW and LB. KF, SB, SW and LB contributed to the interpretation of the data. The first draft of the manuscript was written by KF. SB, SW and LB commented on the manuscript and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katja Frede.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study complies with local and national regulations.

Consent to participate

Not applicable, since this study did not include human participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable, since this study did not include human participants.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frede, K., Winkelmann, S., Busse, L. et al. The effect of LED light quality on the carotenoid metabolism and related gene expression in the genus Brassica. BMC Plant Biol 23, 328 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04326-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04326-4

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us