Skip to main content
Download PDF

Unravelling the genetic diversity and population structure of common walnut in the Iranian Plateau

BMC Plant Biology volume 23, Article number: 201 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Common walnut (Juglans regia L.) has a long cultivation history, given its highly valuable wood and rich nutritious nuts. The Iranian Plateau has been considered as one of the last glaciation refugia and a centre of origin and domestication for the common walnut. However, a prerequisite to conserve or utilize the genetic resources of J. regia in the plateau is a comprehensive evaluation of the genetic diversity that is conspicuously lacking. In this regard, we used 31 polymorphic simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers to delineate the genetic variation and population structure of 508 J. regia individuals among 27 populations from the Iranian Plateau.

Results

The SSR markers expressed a high level of genetic diversity (HO = 0.438, and HE = 0.437). Genetic differentiation among the populations was moderate (FST = 0.124), and genetic variation within the populations (79%) significantly surpassed among populations (21%). The gene flow (Nm = 1.840) may have remarkably influenced the population genetic structure of J. regia, which can be attributed to anthropological activities and wind dispersal of pollen. The STRUCTURE analysis divided the 27 populations into two main clusters. Comparing the neighbor-joining and principal coordinate analysis dendrograms and the Bayesian STRUCTURE analysis revealed the general agreement between the population subdivisions and the genetic relationships among the populations. However, a few geographically close populations dispersed into different clusters. Further, the low genetic diversity of the Sulaymaniyah (SMR) population of Iraq necessitates urgent conservation by propagation and seedling management or tissue culture methods; additionally, we recommend the indispensable preservation of the Gonabad (RGR) and Arak (AKR) populations in Iran.

Conclusions

These results reflected consistent high geographical affinity of the accession across the plateau. Our findings suggest that gene flow is a driving factor influencing the genetic structure of J. regia populations, whereas ecological and geological variables did not act as strong barriers. Moreover, the data reported herein provide new insights into the population structure of J. regia germplasm, which will help conserve genetic resources for the future, hence improving walnut breeding programs’ efficiency.

Peer Review reports

Background

Genetic diversity has been constantly found to be essential for adapting the population to environmental changes [1]. Genetic diversity analysis of plants' germplasm can expand our knowledge of evolution and genetic variability determinants giving profound insights into plant conservation [1-3].

Juglans L. belongs to the Juglandaceae family, which includes ca. 21 deciduous tree species [4]; It is a widespread genus ranging from North and South America, the West Indies, and Southeast Europe to East Asia [4-6]. Juglans regia L., also called common walnut, English walnut, or Persian walnut (hereafter refer as common walnut), is monoecious and heterodichogamous with 2n = 2x = 32 [7]. The species is cultivated across the temperate and tropical regions of the world for its high-quality timber and for its excellent, and edible nuts [8, 9]. High genetic variation has been reported among walnut populations worldwide, and seed reproduction, high heterozygosity, and allogamy have been suggested to be responsible for the shaping of high genetic differentiation in this species [10-12].

Common walnut is one of the most essential fruit trees cultivated primarily for edible nuts since ancient times. It is highly supported that walnut originated from the Iranian Plateau [13-15]; previous findings proposed that the walnut’s domestication first occurred in the plateau, including parts of Iran, the southern Caucasus, Turkmenistan, and afterward expanded east to China and west to Europe by human movement via the Persian Royal Road and Silk Road [14, 16-18].

The Iranian Plateau is situated at the upper plate of the Arabia-Eurasia collision zone [19]. The plateau is located between East Azerbaijan province to the northwest of Iran (East Azerbaijan province), and Afghanistan and Pakistan to the east, and Zagros Mountains to the west. It also includes the Kurdistan region of Iraq, Turkmenistan, and smaller parts of the Republic of Azerbaijan. The plateau hosts an extraordinarily diverse flora given the specific topographic conditions, such as heterogeneous landscapes [20]. The largest part of the plateau is in Iran (almost 64%), where J. regia cultivation is 4.48 × 104 ha, producing 3.57 × 105 tons of nuts in shell, and is ranked the third globally [21].

Juglans regia formed fragmented forests in the west of Asia during the Pleistocene [22]. It has been revealed [23, 24] that Juglans pollen was present throughout the Upper Paleolithic in Georgia and northwestern Iraq. Glacial refugia often show more values of genetic diversity conservation than postglacially colonized regions [25]. The Iranian Plateau has been considered as one of the ancient centres of diversity and an important glacial refugium of the common walnut after Pleistocene glaciations in Asia [22].

The Iranian Plateau contains several mountain ranges, such as the Alborz, Zagros, Kopet Dagh, Baluchistan, and Hindu Kush, etc.; hence, they might have facilitated the genetic divergence of J. regia populations. Nowadays, the walnut in the plateau is distributed in different ecological environments and geographic conditions. As elevation increases, climate, and physicochemical properties are also affected, which may increase population variation. These conditions might support the potential of the Iranian Plateau walnut as a rich gene resource.

Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) or microsatellites, due to their codominant inheritance, being genome- and locus-specific, high polymorphism [26, 27], have been widely utilized in studying of genetic variation of common walnut [21, 28-41]. However, they all focused on evaluating the genetic variability of regional genotypes with a few markers and populations. Additionally, political instability in some countries, such as Iraq and Afghanistan, and formidable geographic barriers to sampling have made little information available for the whole plateau. Due to the widespread distribution of J. regia and the lack of an accurate, comparative, and large-scale molecular study, the extent and structure of the J. regia genetic diversity across the Iranian Plateau have never been undertaken. To fill the gap, based on a comprehensive population-level field sampling of common walnut from four countries across the Iranian Plateau, we aim to 1) evaluate the genetic diversity of walnut populations using microsatellites, 2) assess the genetic differentiation and structure of walnut populations, and 3) propose the recommendations for germplasm conservation and resource development and utilization.

Results

Genetic diversity of SSR markers

All the primers produced polymorphic fragments where the average number of alleles across marker loci was 6.129 and ranged from 3 (in JM5446) to 11 (in JS12) (Table 1). The number of effective alleles (NE) varied from 1.024 (JM5446) to 3.964 (BFU-Jr38), with an average of 2.379. Observed heterozygosity (HO) and expected heterozygosity (HE) varied from 0.012 (JM5446) and 0.023 (JM5446) to 0.697 (JS09) and 0.744 (JS12), with a mean of 0.437 and 0.511, respectively.

Table 1 Genetic diversity of the 31 microsatellite loci used in this study
Full size table

The mean Shannon’s Information index (I) was 0.976 and ranged from 0.072 (JM5446) to 1.598 (BFU-Jr38) across loci. In addition, unbiased expected heterozygosity (uHE) of individual loci ranged from 0.023 at JM5446 to 0.748 at BFU-Jr38 and averaged at 0.512 alleles per locus. The Fixation index (F) ranged from 0.020 at JR05 to 0.545 at BFU-Jr277 and averaged 0.164 (Table 1). Moreover, Polymorphic information content (PIC) varied from 0.022 (in JM5446) to 0.743 (in CUJRD462), with a mean of 0.503.

Population genetic diversity and gene flow

The genetic diversity parameters at the population level were considerably different across populations of J. regia (Table 2). The number of observed alleles (NA) averaged 3.141 and varied from 2.323 (GMR) to 3.419 (TPR and GDR). The mean number of effective alleles (NE) across 27 populations was 2.067, ranging from 1.789 (GMR) to 2.284 (AKR). The observed heterozygosity (HO) and expected heterozygosity (HE) across all populations varied from 0.347 (ZAR) to 0.522 (AKR) and 0.371 (SMR) to 0.495 (RGR), with an average of 0.438 and 0.437, respectively.

Table 2 Genetic diversity within 27 populations of Juglans regia based on SSR data
Full size table

The populations AKR (NE = 2.284, HO = 0.522, HE = 0.492 and I = 0.864), GDR (NE = 2.211, HO = 0.515, HE = 0.484 and I = 0.852), and RGR (NE = 2.264, HO = 0.5, HE = 0.495 and I = 0.877) showed high levels of genetic diversity, while those with low values were observed in SMR (NE = 1.826, HO = 0.348, HE = 0.371 and I = 0.674) and GMR (NE = 1.789, HO = 0.456, HE = 0.372 and I = 0.602). The fixation index (F) averaged 0.005, ranging from -0.201 (GMR) to 0.170 (ARR). The low level of fixation index identifies the deficiency of heterozygosity in the J. regia populations. The high values of uHE were observed in populations RGR (0.508) and AKR (0.507), whereas the low uHE values belong to populations SMR (0.381) and TKR (0.394). AR values ranged between 2.040 (GMR) and 2.565 (RGR). As with the case of uHE, population RGR also represented a high AR level. The mean polymorphic loci (PPL) percentage across 27 populations was high (91.40%) and ranged from 80.65% for TKR to 100% for EHR (Table 2). The gene flow (Nm) between populations averaged 1.840. The highest value of Nm was observed between ARR and TKR populations (0.857), whereas the lowest value belongs to TAR and TPR populations (5.614) (Table S4).

Population clustering and genetic structure

Patterns of genetic differentiation

The genetic differentiation coefficient (FST) was moderate, ranging from 0.042 between TPR and TAR to 0.225 between ARR and TKR. Moreover, pairwise comparative analysis of Nei’s genetic distance values represents minimum range of 0.046 between ETR and ESR to 0.200 between ARR and TKR (Fig. 1, Table S3). The data demonstrated that populations ARR and TKR are genetically far from each other in terms of genetic distance and genetic differentiation. Also, the results of AMOVA analysis indicated that variation within populations was 79%, while variation among populations was 21% (Table 3), possibly because of the high gene flow (Nm = 1.840) between J. regia populations.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Heat map depicting pairwise genetic distance between populations. The left-lower half represents the genetic differentiation (FST); the right-upper half indicates the genetic distance (DA)

Full size image
Table 3 Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of 27 populations of Juglans regia
Full size table

Two main genetic groups

Bayesian structure analysis of 508 samples revealed the maximum peak at K = 2, and one smaller peak at K = 4, hence K = 2, 3, and 4 are shown (Fig. 2). At K = 2, the populations of J. regia were grouped into two genetic clusters. The first genetic cluster (green) mainly contained 213 individuals from 11 populations, including GSR, GDR, SAR, TER, QAR, RGR, RUR, MZR, TPR, TAR, and TKR. The second comprises 292 accessions collected from 16 populations (blue, Fig. 2a). Generally, lots of admixtures were detected among most populations, except populations TER, QAR, ARR, ESR, ETR, and ZAR. Populations corresponding to these groups were geographically differentiated. Each population and its proportion are represented as a pie chart in Fig. 3. Consistent with STRUCTURE results, K = 2, the populations were separated into two clusters in the PCoA (Fig. 4) and NJ analyses (Figs. 5 & S1). In PCoA, both the first (5.71%) and second (4.72%) axes generally separated individuals of J. regia into two main groups (blue and green ones). The admixtures were grouped between the above groups (Fig. 4).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Bayesian inference of the number of clusters (K) from 2 to 4 of J. regia by STRUCTURE. (a) Different colors indicate various genetic components, green for G1, blue for G2, yellow for G3, and orange for G4. (b) The optimal K value using the Delta K (ΔK) method. (c) Mean log-likelihood of the data at varying estimates of K

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Geographical distribution of the genetic structure in 27 populations across the Iranian Plateau. Right-lower inset represents the population from Georgia. The proportion of the pie charts are based on the STRUCTURE results in Fig. 2a (K = 2). The designation of G1 and G2 corresponds to Fig. 2a

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Principal Co-ordinates Analysis (PCoA) of 508 individuals based on 31 microsatellite loci. The designation of G1 and G2 corresponds to Fig. 2a, while the grey crosses indicate mixed individuals

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Neighbor-joining tree of 508 individuals, colors correspond to Fig. 4. The designation of G1 and G2 corresponds to Fig. 2a, while the grey branches represent mixed individuals

Full size image

In addition, at the maximum likelihood clustering with K = 3, the number of optimum groups was three. Cluster 1 consisted of six TKR, TAR, TPR, MZR, RUR, and RGR (green) populations. Cluster 2 arises from 13 populations, including HMR, JBR, GMR, AKR, EHR, KNR, WER, NGR, ZAR, KHR, ARR, ESR, and ETR (blue). Cluster 3 contained eight populations in QAR, TER, SAR, GDR, GSR, SMR, KDR, and KSR (yellow). These results were consistent with the results from the PCoA (Fig. S2). Further, 508 individuals were assigned to four clusters at K = 4. Populations from Turkmenistan, the northeast, and one population from north of Iran (TKR, TAR, TPR, RUR, RGR, and MZR) were grouped in cluster 1 (green). While cluster 2 (blue) encompassed the populations of HMR, JBR, GMR, AKR, EHR, KNR, WER, NGR, ZAR, KHR, ARR, ESR, and ETR. Accessions in cluster 3 were mainly from the west of Iran (yellow), with the GSR population being an exception, not following this pattern. Populations from the Center and north of Iran, including QAR, TER, SAR, and GDR, were grouped in cluster 4 (orange) (Fig. 2a). Each population and its proportion are represented in figure S3 according to colours depicting the genetic cluster identified in STRUCTURE. The STRUCTURE analysis showed gene penetration among the 508 individuals in the four clusters (Figs. S4 & S5).

Mantel Test

Simple and partial Mantel tests were carried out to explore the correlations between genetic distance (FST) and environmental factors. The results stipulated a weak correlation between genetic distance and geographical distance (r = 0.26, P = 0.05; Fig. S6a) and between genetic diversity and altitude (r = -0.19, P = 0.05; Fig. S6b) in the whole dataset.

Discussion

Genetic diversity of common walnut populations

Our findings indicate that populations of J. regia from the Iranian Plateau possess moderate genetic diversity. The average HO and HE, and NE in the current study were lower than in the previous studies [9, 42-46] (Table 4). The lowest genetic diversity was observed in the populations from Iraq and Georgia. The low genetic diversity in the latter might be attributed to a small sample size. The presence of low genetic diversity in SAM population indicates that the main factors behind this might be ecological factors. The population from Iraq, which is situated in a relatively low-altitude area (1186 m), will be most affected by human activities and global warming. Plenty of alleles will be lost due to overexploitation and inappropriate climate warming, thus genetic diversity will be considerably reduced. Additionally, habitat changes and human interference impact the genetic diversity of the SMR population in some ways. The SMR population is located in tourist hotspot, where the natural habitat was disturbed, which may directly cause their genetic variation decrease.

Table 4 Comparison of genetic diversity of Juglans regia between current study and previous ones which used microsatellite markers
Full size table

Populations of RGR, AKR, and GDR possessed the highest genetic diversity. According to our observations in the field and enquiries from the farmers, some samples were almost 1000 years old in the AKR population. In addition, the population GDR has been considered a wild stand in Iran [47, 48]. Therefore, the remaining trees in Talesh (GDR) and populations from Arak (AKR) imply the reservation of an invaluable genetic source. We presumed that heterogeneous environment of habitat and climatic features might drive the local adaptation, preserving the genetic variation of RGR, AKR, and GDR populations at the same time. GDR population is located in remote areas, which is advantageous to maintaining high genetic diversity. However, we did not conduct a habitat survey, so, the factors that led to the high level of genetic differentiation of these populations should be elucidated in future studies.

Population genetic structure among J. regia populations

The gene flow and genetic differentiation coefficient are critical parameters for realizing the population structure [49]. The genetic differentiation coefficient (FST) varied from 0.042 to 0.225, with an average of 0.124 within 508 J. regia individuals (Table S3). According to Wright’s classification [50], the FST value indicates moderate differentiation among the populations. Different factors might cause moderate population differentiation, such as pollen and seed diffusion, geographic isolation, breeding system, and environmental heterogeneity [51]. The present study’s most feasible explanation for moderate genetic differentiation could be the out-crossing and wind-pollination of J. regia. The close genetic distances between TPR/TAR accessions (0.042) and AKR/JBR (0.044) showed that these populations share many common alleles and are closely related. The adjacency might justify the genetic affinity between these populations.

The results of the AMOVA analysis indicated that 21% of the variation belonged to the differences among populations (P < 0.001), and 79% was attributed to the differences within populations. Significant variation within populations and a small variance between populations could be a result of the wind pollination system [52, 53], or a broad exchange of seeds among farmers from different regions. Hence, when selecting populations with high genetic diversity for breeding programs, the emphasis should be on individuals within the population.

The mean gene flow (Nm) was 1.84; if Nm is = 1, which indicates high-intensity gene flow between populations [50], preventing genetic drift and decreasing the genetic differentiation among populations [54]. Our results suggest that gene flow is one of the main factors influencing the genetic structure of J. regia populations. Therefore, the differentiation within populations was remarkably greater than between populations. In contrast to previous studies [44, 55], our findings demonstrated that ecological and geological features such as Zagros, Alborz, and Kopet Dagh mountains and deserts were not a barrier to gene flow as previously envisioned. Therefore, we postulated that the current level of moderate diversity is due to sustaining a high level of gene flow in this species in Iran and neighboring countries. Pollen spreading is probably the determinant mechanism of gene flow among populations [45]. Besides the natural factors, human-mediated selection, and exchanges of the germplasms, such as choosing fat-rich nuts, could have likely contributed to the distribution and level of genetic differentiation of J. regia.

The three complementary approaches, NJ, PCoA, and STRUCTURE, employed to investigate the structure of the J. regia accessions mostly confirmed each other. The findings reflected consistency with the accession’s geographic distribution pattern.

Iraq, Georgia, and Turkmenistan are geographically located in the west, northwest, and northeast of Iran, respectively. The Kopet Dagh mountain range is on the border between Turkmenistan and Iran [56]. Moreover, Hawraman or Uramanat is a mountainous region divided between the provinces of Kermanshah and Kurdistan (west of Iran), and the northeast of the Kurdistan Region in Iraq. The STRUCTURE and NJ analyses placed them adjacent to their neighboring populations in Iran. These data prove that walnut populations in Georgia, Turkmenistan, and Iraq may have originated from the same historic gene pools as their counterparts in Iran. In addition, Georgia does not have a common border with Iran, but is located near the northwestern populations of Iran. The finding was inferred to indicate that human activities may have promoted long-distance dispersal. Samples from Georgia have also been assembled in one cluster with Iranians’ in Pollegioni et al. [17]. Additionally, a lot of admixtures were detected among all populations that might reflect allele sharing [57].

The relationship between molecular data of J. regia populations and environmental factors was investigated using the simple and partial Mantel tests. The findings indicated a weak correlation between the genetic and geographic distance among the populations (r = 0.26, P = 0.05). The genetic structure of some populations in the plateau was not influenced by geographic distribution; for example, grouping accessions from the different regions in a similar cluster (e.g., GSR) could result from low genetic variation among the populations suggesting that the genetic structure of J. regia populations does not always correspond to their geographical regions. The reduced genetic structure, even in broad geographic barriers including the Lut desert, Alborz and Zagros Mountain ranges, can be attributed to human-mediated gene flow among the populations. Further investigation to identify the determinant reasons is needed.

The partial Mantel test also exhibited a weak correlation between the genetic distance and altitude (r = -0.19, P = 0.029). It could be speculated that the genetic differentiation of J. regia populations in the Iranian Plateau might be affected by altitude. Nevertheless, further research using additional samples from the neighboring countries such as Afghanistan and Pakistan, and other molecular markers (e.g., SNP) will be helpful to provide a more accurate conclusion on the driving force behind the population structure in the Iranian Plateau. In addition, considering the presence of many commercial walnut cultivars around the world, it is suggested to include commercial cultivars with comrephesive sampling scheme in future research for a better population genetic comparison between native populations and native plantation.

Conservation implications

A comprehensive insight into the genetic differentiation and structure are prerequisites to devising species preservation measures [58]. From a conservation standpoint, the maximum genetic differentiation was identified within AKR, RGR, and GDR populations. The GDR population has been considered a wild stand in Iran [47, 48]. As mentioned earlier, the AKR population includes some trees that are more than 1000 years old. These characteristics are encouraging for preserving the genetic resources of these populations for in situ conservation. There is an urgent need to increase interpopulation genetic diversity for SMR populations that showed low genetic diversity and approaches through assistant migration whereby methods such as such as propagation, seedling management, and tissue culture could be the most effective.

Conclusions

Our analyses provide the most comprehensive investigation, to date, on the genetic diversity and population structure of J. regia in the Iranian Plateau. The findings revealed moderate genetic differentiation and high gene flow, which were attributed to its out-crossing mating system and anthropogenic activities. In addition, the data generated here confirmed that the accessions contained a relatively high level of genetic variation and a weak correlation between the genetic and geographic distance of J. regia. The common walnut populations of the Iranian Plateau can be divided into two main genetic groups, but with a wide genetic exchange. Moreover, our results provide insights into incorporating the most diverse populations, including AKR, RGR, and GDR into germplasm resources conservation. Lastly, we put forward an extended sampling of J. regia populations from more countries to enhance better understanding the genetic relationship of J. regia in the Iranian Plateau with other regions.

Methods

Sampling

A total of 508 walnut trees from 27 populations were collected from 21 provinces of Iran and one location each from Georgia and Iraq, and three from Turkmenistan with various climates and altitudes (Fig. 6) during the spring and summer of 2019.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Geographical distribution of the 27 J. regia populations (see Table S1 for detailed sampling information). (a) The geographical location of the populations; (b) The right-lower inset shows the geographical location of three populations from Turkmenistan

Full size image

We planned to collect ca. 20 trees per location, but 11 populations had sample sizes ranging from 7 to 21 individuals. The geographical location of each population was recorded (Table S1). Depending on their availability to avoid consanguinity, the trees were at least 100 m apart, with a trunk diameter of more than 100 cm, and at least 100 years old based on interviews with orchard owners and local people. The human participants (orchard owners and local people) who were interviewed are not directly involved in this study. All healthy leaf samples intended for DNA extraction were collected and dried. Voucher specimens were deposited at the herbarium of Yasouj University Herbarium (YUH) in Iran.

DNA extraction and PCR amplification

Total DNA was extracted from ca. 20 mg of dry leaves according to a modified CTAB method [59, 60]. DNA concentration and quality were measured on 1% TAE agarose gels and using a NanoDrop®ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA); subsequently, all samples were diluted to 30–50 ng/mL for PCR reactions. Previous studies [46, 61] described a multiplex of 31 pairs was used for genotyping the 508 walnut trees (Tables 1, S2). PCR amplification and cycling conditions were performed according to Magige et al. [46]. Briefly, pre-denaturation at 98 °C for 2 min, 35 cycles of denaturation at 98 °C for 10 s, primer annealing at 53–61 °C for 15 s, extension at 72 °C for 10 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min, with a holding temperature of 4 °C. The fragment sizes of PCR products were separated with an ABI 3730xl automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). GENEMARKER v4.0 (SoftGenetics, State College, PA, USA) was applied to score the SSR data as diploid genotypes.

Statistical analysis

To assign the level of the genetic diversity of loci and populations, genetic diversity analysis, such as number of alleles (NA), observed heterozygosity (HO) and expected heterozygosity (HE), genetic differentiation coefficient (FST), gene flow (Nm), fixation index (FIT), polymorphic information content (PIC), inbreeding coefficient (FIS), unbiased expected heterozygosity (uHE) across loci, Nei’s genetic distances between populations, and analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) were performed in GeneAlex v.6.5 [62]. Allelic richness (AR) was assigned with the R package “hierfstat”(https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/hierfstat) package v.3.0.7 [63] for R version 3.6.3 [64]. Assessing of the pairwise genetic differentiation (FST) and Nei’s genetic distance (DA) between pairs of populations was performed using Arlequin v.3.5 [65] and MSA v.4.05 [66]. Then, the data was reflected on a heatmap by the R package “ggplot” [67].

The genetic assignment of each individual was implemented in STRUCTURE v.2.3.4 [68]. The run parameters were set as follows: burn-in period of 100,000 iterations, length of 1,200,000 Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) generations to increase K values from 1–10. Each K was repeated in 20 simulations. The optimum value of K was evaluated according to the Delta K criterion using STRUCTURE HARVESTER v.0.6.1 [69], and repeated sampling analysis of the results was carried out in CLUMMP v.1.1.2 [70]. Finally, the Distruct v.1.1 software [71] was used to map the results, and STRUCTURE graphical results were plotted with Distruct. The populations were represented on the topographical map according to their relative proportions to the genetic clusters generated from STRUCTURE using ArcGIS v.10.7 (ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA) [72]. The value of Q estimated the affiliation probabilities of each genotype in every cluster, and genotypes were assigned to their relevant clusters based on a threshold value of 0.80. According to Wambulwa et al. [34], individuals with a high percentage of membership (Q = 0.80) in any of the genetic clusters were defined as distinct genetic groups, and the individual with low probabilities (Q < 0.80) were treated as “admixture”.

Moreover, structure in the distribution of genetic differentiation was plotted by principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) using Nei’s genetic distance in R package “ggplot2” [73]. In addition, a graphical presentation of the genetic structure of J. regia populations was acquired by applying the neighbor-joining (NJ) method with 1000 bootstrap replicates in Populations v.1.2.31 [74]. R package “ggtree” [67] was used to visualize the result. Further, the simple and partial Mantel tests were performed with the “vegan” package v.2.5–3 [75] for R version 3.6.3 [64] for correlation between F ST genetic distance, altitude, and geographic (km) differences for the dataset of J. regia. Significance was evaluated by conducting 1000 permutations.

Availability of data and materials

All data from this study are incorporated in this article and its supplementary information.

Abbreviations

N A :

Number of alleles

N E :

Effective number of alleles

I :

Shannon’s information index

A R :

Allelic richness

PPL :

Percentage of polymorphic loci

PIC :

Polymorphic information content

H O :

Observed heterozygosity

H E :

Expected heterozygosity

F ST :

Genetic differentiation coefficient

N m :

Gene flow

F IT :

Fixation index

F IS :

Inbreeding coefficient

uH E :

Unbiased expected heterozygosity

d.f.:

Degree of freedom

D A :

Nei’s genetic distance

SSR:

Simple Sequence Repeats

PCoA:

Principal coordinate analysis

NJ:

Neighbor-joining

AMOVA:

Analysis of molecular variance

IR:

Iran

TM:

Turkmenistan

IQ:

Iraq

GE:

Georgia

References

  1. Kirk H, Freeland JR. Applications and implications of neutral versus non-neutral markers in molecular ecology. Int J Mol Sci. 2011;12(6):3966–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bothwell H, Bisbing S, Therkildsen NO, Crawford L, Alvarez N, Holderegger R, et al. Identifying genetic signatures of selection in a non-model species, alpine gentian (Gentiana nivalis L.), using a landscape genetic approach. Conserv Genet. 2013;14(2):467–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Reed DH, Frankham R. Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Biol Conserv. 2003;17(1):230–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Manning WE. The classification within the Juglandaceae. Ann Missouri Bot Gard. 1978;65(4):1058–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stanford AM, Harden R, Parks CR. Phylogeny and biogeography of Juglans (Juglandaceae) based on matK and ITS sequence data. Am J Bot. 2000;87(6):872–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aradhya MK, Potter D, Gao F, Simon CJ. Molecular phylogeny of Juglans (Juglandaceae): a biogeographic perspective. Tree Genet Genomes. 2007;3(4):363–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Woodworth RH. Meiosis of microsporogenesis in the Juglandaceae. Am J Bot. 1930;17(9):863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vischi M, Chiabà C, Raranciuc S, Poggetti L, Messina R, Ermacora P, et al. Genetic diversity of walnut (Juglans regia L.) in the Eastern Italian Alps. Forests. 2017;8(3):81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Karimi R, Ershadi A, Vahdati K, Woeste K. Molecular characterization of Persian walnut populations in Iran with microsatellite markers. HortScience. 2010;45(9):1403–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shah RA, Baksi P, Jasrotia A, Bhat DJ, Gupta R, Bakshi M. Genetic diversity of walnut (Juglans regia L.) seedlings through SSR markers in north-western Himalayan region of Jammu. Bangladesh J Bot. 2020;49(4):1003–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cosmulescu S. Phenotypic diversity of walnut (Juglans regia L.) in Romania – opportunity for genetic improvement. South-West J Hortic Biol. 2013;4(2):117–26.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ebrahimi A, Zarei A, Zamani Fardadonbeh M, Lawson S. Evaluation of genetic variability among “Early Mature” Juglans regia using microsatellite markers and morphological traits. PeerJ. 2017;5: e3834.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bayazit S, Kazan K, Gülbitti S, Çevik V, Ayanoglu H, Ergül A. AFLP analysis of genetic diversity in low chill requiring walnut (Juglans regia L.) genotypes from Hatay, Turkey. Sci Hortic. 2007;111(4):394–8 Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0304423806004602 .

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ding YM, Cao Y, Zhang WP, Chen J, Liu J, Li P, et al. Population-genomic analyses reveal bottlenecks and asymmetric introgression from Persian into iron walnut during domestication. Genome Biol. 2022;23(1):145.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ebrahimi A, Vahdati K, Fallahi E. Improved success of Persian walnut grafting under environmentally controlled conditions. Int J Fruit Sci. 2007;6(4):3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pollegioni P, Woeste KE, Chiocchini F, del Lungo S, Olimpieri I, Tortolano V, et al. Ancient humans influenced the current spatial genetic structure of common walnut populations in Asia. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(9):e0135980.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Pollegioni P, Woeste K, Chiocchini F, del Lungo S, Ciolfi M, Olimpieri I, et al. Rethinking the history of common walnut (Juglans regia L.) in Europe: Its origins and human interactions. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(3):e0172541.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Laufer B. Sino-Iranica; Chinese contributions to the history of civilization in ancient Iran, with special reference to the history of cultivated plants and products. Chicago: Field Museum of Natural History Press; 1919.

  19. Hatzfeld D, Molnar P. Comparisons of the kinematics and deep structures of the Zagros and Himalaya and of the Iranian and Tibetan plateau and geodynamic implications. Rev Geophys. 2010;48(2):RG2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mashkour M, Tengberg M. Animal–plant interactions on the Iranian plateau and in adjacent areas: Using bioarchaeological methods in the reconstruction of agro-pastoral practices. Environ Archaeol. 2013;18(3):189–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. FAOSTAT. FAO Statistics division. 2022. Available from: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Accessed 20 Dec 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pollegioni P, Woeste KE, Chiocchini F, Olimpieri I, Tortolano V, Clark J, et al. Landscape genetics of Persian walnut (Juglans regia L.) across its Asian range. Tree Genet Genomes. 2014;10(4):1027–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bar-Yosef O, Belfer-Cohen A, Mesheviliani T, Jakeli N, Bar-Oz G, Boaretto E, et al. Dzudzuana: an upper palaeolithic cave site in the Caucasus foothills (Georgia). Antiquity. 2011;85(328):331–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Henry AG, Brooks AS, Piperno DR. Microfossils in calculus demonstrate consumption of plants and cooked foods in Neanderthal diets (Shanidar III, Iraq; Spy I and II, Belgium). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(2):486–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Krebs P, Conedera M, Pradella M, Torriani D, Felber M, Tinner W. Quaternary refugia of the sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.): an extended palynological approach. Hist Archaeobot. 2004;13(4):285–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Powell W, Machray GC, Provan J. Polymorphism revealed by simple sequence repeats. Trends Plant Sci. 1996;1(7):215–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hodel RGJ, Segovia-Salcedo MC, Landis JB, Crowl AA, Sun M, Liu X, et al. The report of my death was an exaggeration: a review for researchers using microsatellites in the 21st century. Appl Plant Sci. 2016;4(6):1600025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bernard A, Barreneche T, Lheureux F, Dirlewanger E. Analysis of genetic diversity and structure in a worldwide walnut (Juglans regia L.) germplasm using SSR markers. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(11):e0208021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Shamlu F, Rezaei M, Lawson S, Ebrahimi A, Biabani A, Khan-Ahmadi A. Genetic diversity of superior Persian walnut genotypes in Azadshahr. Iran Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2018;24(5):939–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yuan XY, Sun YW, Bai XR, Dang M, Feng XJ, Zulfiqar S, et al. Population structure, genetic diversity, and gene introgression of two closely related walnuts (Juglans regia and J. sigillata) in southwestern China revealed by EST-SSR markers. Forests. 2018;9(10):646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Torokeldiev N, Ziehe M, Gailing O, Finkeldey R. Genetic diversity and structure of natural Juglans regia L. populations in the southern Kyrgyz Republic revealed by nuclear SSR and EST-SSR markers. Tree Genet Genomes. 2019;15(5):5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Taheri A, Seyedi N, Abdollahi Mandoulakani B, Mirzaghaderi G, Najafi S, Vahdati K. Genetic diversity in Persian walnut (Juglans regia L.) seedlings using SSR markers. Sci Hortic. 2022;8(1):13–26.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gaisberger H, Legay S, Andre C, Loo J, Azimov R, Aaliev S, et al. Diversity under threat: Connecting genetic diversity and threat mapping to set conservation priorities for Juglans regia L. populations in central Asia. Front Ecol Evol. 2020;8:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wambulwa MC, Meegahakumbura MK, Kamunya S, Muchugi A, Möller M, Liu J, et al. Insights into the genetic relationships and breeding patterns of the African tea germplasm based on nSSR markers and cpDNA sequences. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7. PMCID: PMC5004484

  35. Wambulwa MC, Fan PZ, Milne R, Wu ZY, Luo YH, Wang YH, et al. Genetic analysis of walnut cultivars from southwest China: implications for germplasm improvement. Plant Divers. 2022;44(6):530–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Salieh FMH, Tahir NAR, Faraj JM. Assessment of genetic relationship among some Iraqi walnut genotypes (Juglans regia L.) in Sulaimani Region using RAPD and SSR molecular markers. Jordan J Biol Sci. 2013;9(3):351–62.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Eser E, Topcu H, Kefayati S, Sutyemez M, Islam MdR, Kafkas S. Highly polymorphic novel simple sequence repeat markers from Class I repeats in walnut (Juglans regia L.). Turk J Agric For. 2019;43(2):174–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kefayati S, Ikhsan AS, Sütyemez M, Paizila A, Topçu H, Bükücü SB, et al. A genetic linkage map for walnut based on SSR markers. Acta Hortic. 2021;1318:39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mahmoodi R, Rahmani F, Rezaee R. Genetic diversity among Juglans regia L. genotypes assessed by morphological traits and microsatellite markers. Span J Agric Res. 2013;11(2):431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ruiz-Garcia L, Lopez-Ortega G, Fuentes Denia A, Frutos Tomas D. Identification of a walnut (Juglans regia L.) germplasm collection and evaluation of their genetic variability by microsatellite markers. Span J Agric Res. 2011;9(1):179–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Noor Shah U, Mir JI, Ahmed N, Fazili KM. Assessment of germplasm diversity and genetic relationships among walnut (Juglans regia L.) genotypes through microsatellite markers. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2018;17(4):339–50.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ebrahimi A, Zarei A, Lawson S, Woeste KE, Smulders MJM. Genetic diversity and genetic structure of Persian walnut (Juglans regia) accessions from 14 European, African, and Asian countries using SSR markers. Tree Genet Genomes. 2016;12(6):114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Karimi R, Ershadi A, Ehtesham Nia A, Sharifani M, Rasouli M, Ebrahimi A, et al. Morphological and molecular evaluation of Persian walnut populations in Northern and Western regions of Iran. J Nuts. 2014;5(2):21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Vahdati K, Karimi R, Ershadi A. Genetic structure of wild walnut populations in Iran. Acta Hortic. 2015;1074:125–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Vahdati K, Mohseni Pourtaklu S, Karimi R, Barzehkar R, Amiri R, Mozaffari M, et al. Genetic diversity and gene flow of some Persian walnut populations in southeast of Iran revealed by SSR markers. Plant Syst and Evol. 2015;301(2):691–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Magige EA, Fan PZ, Wambulwa MC, Milne R, Wu ZY, Luo YH, et al. Genetic diversity and structure of Persian walnut (Juglans regia L.) in Pakistan: Implications for conservation. Plants. 2022;11(13):1652.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Maghsoodi M, Sheidai M, Koohdar F. Population genetic study in Juglans regia L. (Persian walnut) and its taxonomic status within the genus Juglans L. Phytotaxa. 2018;376(4):154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Jafari Sayadi MH, Vahdati K, Mozafari J, Mohajerany MR, Leslie CA. Natural Hyrcanian populations of Persian walnut in Iran. Acta Hortic. 2012;948:97–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang SQ. Genetic diversity and population structure of the endangered species Paeonia decomposita endemic to China and implications for its conservation. BMC Plant Biol. 2020;20(1):510.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Wright S. Evolution and the genetics of populations. Vol. 4. Chicago: Variability within and among natural populations illustrated. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1978. p. 1–590.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Yang S, Xue S, Kang W, Qian Z, Yi Z. Genetic diversity and population structure of Miscanthus lutarioriparius, an endemic plant of China. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(2):e0211471.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Nie G, Zhang XQ, Huang LK, Xu WZ, Wang JP, Zhang YW, et al. Genetic variability and population structure of the potential bioenergy crop Miscanthus sinensis (Poaceae) in southwest China based on SRAP markers. Molecules. 2014;19(8):12881–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhao Y, Basak S, Fleener CE, Egnin M, Sacks EJ, Prakash CS, et al. Genetic diversity of Miscanthus sinensis in US naturalized populations. GCB Bioenergy. 2017;9(5):965–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Slatkin M. Rare alleles as indicators of gene flow. Evolution. 1985;39(1):53–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Arab MM, Marrano A, Abdollahi-Arpanahi R, Leslie CA, Askari H, Neale DB, et al. Genome-wide patterns of population structure and association mapping of nut-related traits in Persian walnut populations from Iran using the Axiom J. regia 700K SNP array. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):6376.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Rustamov AE. Turkmenistan: landscape–geographical features, biodiversity, and ecosystems. In: Zonn IS, Kostianoy AG, editors. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry. Berlin: Springer; 2012. p. 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Huang CL, Chen JH, Tsang MH, Chung JD, Chang CT, Hwang SY. Influences of environmental and spatial factors on genetic and epigenetic variations in Rhododendron oldhamii (Ericaceae). Tree Genet Genomes. 2015;11(1):823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wuyun T, Amo H, Xu J, Ma T, Uematsu C, Katayama H. Population structure of and conservation strategies for wild Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim. China PLoS ONE. 2015;10(8): e0133686.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull. 1987;19(1):11–5.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Liu J, Gao LM. Comparative analysis of three different methods of total DNA extraction used in Taxus. Guihai. 2011;31:244–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Xu Z, Jin Y, Milne RI, Xiahou Z, Qin H, Ye L, et al. Development of 32 novel microsatellite loci in Juglans sigillata using genomic data. Appl Plant Sci. 2020;8(3): e11328.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Peakall R, Smouse PE. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research--an update. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(19):2537–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Gruber B, Adamack A. PopGenReport, a simple framework to analyse population and landscape genetic data. version 3.0.7. 2022. https://github.com/green-striped-gecko/PopGenReport.

    Google Scholar 

  64. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020. https:// www.R- project. org.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Excoffier L, Lischer HEL. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010;10(3):564–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Dieringer D, Schlötterer C. Microsatellite analyser (MSA): a platform independent analysis tool for large microsatellite data sets. Mol Ecol Notes. 2003;3(1):167–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Yu G, Smith DK, Zhu H, Guan Y, Lam TT. ggtree: an R package for visualization and annotation of phylogenetic trees with their covariates and other associated data. Methods Ecol Evol. 2017;8(1):28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155(2):945–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Earl DA, vonHoldt BM. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour. 2012;4(2):359–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA. CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. J Bioinform. 2007;23(14):1801–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Rosenberg NA. Distruct: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol Ecol Notes. 2003;4(1):137–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. ESRI. ArcGIS® Desktop 10.7: ArcMap™ functionality matrix. Redlands: Environmental Systems Research Institute; 2019.

  73. Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2016. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  74. Langella O. POPULATIONS 1.2.31. Population genetic software CNRS UPR9034. http://bioinformatics.org/~tryphon/populations/; 2018.

  75. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, et al. Vegan: Community ecology package. R package version 2.5–3. https://cran.r-project.org, https://github.com/vegandevs/vegan. 2018.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Profs. Wei-Bang Sun, Victor Fet, Mr. Gochmyrat Kutlyev, Dr. Areej Alrawi, Mis. Ying Chen, Mis. Min Zhang and Mr. Zuo-Ying Xiahou, for field sampling or lab work. We are also grateful to Mr. Reza Akbari, the staff at the organization of Agriculture-Jahad of 22 provinces of Iran, Dr. Sara Kharazmi, Mr. Morteza Ghayormand, Mr. Mahdi Vafi, and other volunteers for their help with field-work in Iran. We would also like to thank Miss Winnie Mambo and Mr. Dennis Alego for their assistance with English editing.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32170398, 41971071, 31770367), the Top-notch Young Talents Project of Yunnan Provincial “Ten Thousand Talents Program” (YNWR-QNBJ-2018–146), CAS “Light of West China” Program, and Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan (202201AT070222), Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS (ZDBS-LY-7001) and Yunnan Fundamental Research Projects (202201BC070001). Molecular experiments were performed at the Laboratory of Molecular Biology at the Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran

    Robabeh Shahi Shavvon

  2. CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, Yunnan, China

    Hai-Ling Qi, Hong-Yu Wu & Jie Liu

  3. Germplasm of Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, Yunnan, China

    Hai-Ling Qi, Pen-Zheng Fan & Jie Liu

  4. School of Ecology and Environmental Science, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, China

    Hai-Ling Qi & Yue-Hua Wang

  5. Department of Plant Sciences, University of California - Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA

    Mohammad Mafakheri

  6. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Pen-Zheng Fan & Hong-Yu Wu

  7. Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

    Fatemeh Bazdid Vahdati

  8. Department of Biology, College of Education for Pure Sciences (Ibn Al-Haitham), University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq

    Hanady S. Al-Shmgani

Authors
  1. Robabeh Shahi Shavvon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hai-Ling Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Mafakheri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pen-Zheng Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hong-Yu Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fatemeh Bazdid Vahdati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hanady S. Al-Shmgani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yue-Hua Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jie Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Liu J. and Shahi Shavvon R. conceptualized the project; Shahi Shavvon R., Liu, J., Bazdid Vahdati F., Al-Shmgani H.S. are responsive to plant resources; Fan P.-Z., Qi H.-L., Wu H.-Y., Wang Y.-H., performed data curation; Qi H.-L., Mafakheri M., Shahi Shavvon R. performed formal analyses; Shahi Shavvon R. wrote the original draft; Liu J. and Shahi Shavvon R. and Mafakheri M. reviewed & edited the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Robabeh Shahi Shavvon or Jie Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The authors confirm that all methods involving the plant and its material complied with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

 Table S1. Detailed sampling information of 27 Juglans regia populations across the Iranian Plateau. Table S2. Detailed information for the 31 pairs of primers and their combination for multiplex PCR. Table S3. Population pairwise FST and Nei’s genetic distance (DA). Lower-left part: FST; upper-right part: DA. Table S4. Gene flow (Nm) among populations. Fig. S1. Neighbor-joining tree of 508 individuals, colors correspond to Fig. 4. The designation of G1 and G2 corresponds to Fig. 2a, while the grey branches represent mixed individuals. Fig. S2. Principal Co-ordinates Analysis (PCoA) analysis of 508 individuals based on Nei’s genetic distance (DA). The groups were defined according to STRUCTURE analysis (K=3, Q> 0.8). Fig. S3. Geographical distribution of the genetic structure of 27 populations. Pie charts show the genetic proposition of each cluster in STRUCTURE analysis (K=4). Fig. S4. Principal Co-ordinates Analysis (PCoA) of 508 individuals based on Nei’s genetic distance (DA). The groups were defined according to STRUCTURE analysis (K=4, Q> 0.8). Fig. S5. Neighbor-joining tree of 508 individuals. Colors correspond to Fig. S4. Fig. S6. Genetic isolation by distance of 27 populations in the Iranian Plateau. (a) genetic distance and geographical distance (r= 0.26, P= 0.05), (b) genetic distance and altitude (r= -0.19, P= 0.05).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shahi Shavvon, R., Qi, HL., Mafakheri, M. et al. Unravelling the genetic diversity and population structure of common walnut in the Iranian Plateau. BMC Plant Biol 23, 201 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04190-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04190-2

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us