Skip to main content

Chromosomal-level genome assembly of the high-quality Xian/Indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) Xiangyaxiangzhan

Abstract

The indica rice variety XYXZ carries elite traits including appearance and eating quality. Here, we report the de novo assembly of XYXZ using Illumine paired-end whole-genome shotgun sequencing and Nanopore sequencing. We annotated 39,722 protein-coding genes in the 395.04 Mb assembly. In comparison to other cultivars, XYXZ showed a larger gene size including the transcripts and introns, and more exons per gene. And hundreds of ultra-long genes were also detected. A total of 4362 complete LTRs were annotated, and among them, many were located next to or in protein-coding genes including several genes related to rice quality. We observed the different distributions of LTRs in these genes among XYXZ, Nipponbare, and R498, implying these LTRs might potentially affect expressions of the proximal genes and rice quality. Overall, This chromosome-length genome assembly of XYXZ provides a valuable resource for gene discovery, genetic variation and evolution, and the breeding of high-quality rice.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Rice is one of the most important staple foods of the world, especially for most regions in Asia, part of North, and South America, and Africa. These regions accounted for half of the earth’s population. Benefiting from dwarf breeding and hybrid rice, the rice yield in China increased from 1.9 t/hm2 in 1949 to 7.0 t/hm2 in 2018 [1]. After achieving remarkable progress in yield, the central of rice breeding focuses more on quality. Rice quality contains four aspects: appearance, grinding, eating, and nutrient. High-quality rice is being traded at a higher price in the local and global markets [2]. The quality of rice grain mainly includes five aspects: appearance quality, milling quality, cooking quality, nutritional quality, and eating quality [3]. The specific content includes transparency, chalkiness, grain shape, amylose content, gel consistency, gelatinization temperature, protein content, and whether there is fragrance [4]. So far, many QTLs related to rice quality traits have been mapped, but few genes have been characterized, due to the genetic complexity and environmental sensitivity of these traits.

Rice has been long-standing cultivated over the planet, from tropical to temperate, and from basin bottom to high altitude mountains, the huge ecological environment difference has created the genetic diversity of rice ecotypes [5]. To require more complete knowledge of the Oryza sativa gene pool, 3000 rice genomes were resequenced [5, 6]. In addition, several high-quality genome assemblies of rice varieties and species had been reported, including Nipponbare, Shuhui498 (R498), IR64, Zhenshan97 (ZS97), Minghui63 (MH63), Oryza granulate, Oryza longistaminata [7,8,9,10,11]. Genetic and comparative analysis of these genomes serves as a foundation for the large-scale discovery of novel alleles for important rice phenotypes, using various bioinformatics and/or genetic approaches. Despite the great progress in rice breeding and research that had been made in yield and stress resistance traits, achievement in rice quality remains limited. The study of the genome structural characteristics, evolution, and expression regulation of high-grade rice will contribute to precise breeding.

Almost all eukaryotes’ genomes compose high copy numbers of transposable elements (TEs) [12]. TEs are generally able to autonomously change locations within the plant genome through both copy-paste (retrotransposon) and cut-and-paste (DNA transposon) mechanisms [13]. TEs contribute to genetic diversity among species and potentially within species in many ways. For example, TEs situated near the functional region are not under selective pressure; therefore, may have the potential to generate mutations or attain novel functions [14]. Activities of TE may cause gene breakage; genome rearrangement within a certain range, and may also affect the expression of adjacent genes, thus affecting the structure and function of the plant genome [15, 16]. A high abundance of TE copies might hinder the generation of good-quality genome assemblies, with extensive fragmentation of TE-rich regions [17].

The Xiangyaxiangzhan (XYXZ) cultivar (Oryza sativa ssp. indica) is one of the varieties of “Guangdong SIMIAOMI” and has been welcomed by farmers since it launched, with an accumulated planting area of over 200,000 ha in south China. This fragrant cultivar is famous for its long, slender grains with excellent eating quality. Tens of derivative lines and hybrid lines had been developed based on this excellent tasted cultivar. However, like other cultivars with superior grain quality, the XYXZ exhibits inferior agronomic performance, relatively low yield, and is highly prone to environmental conditions [2]. In this article, we report the de novo genome of XYXZ using Illumina and Oxford Nanopore sequencing. A high-quality reference genome was assembled, and annotation for 39,722 protein-coding genes was provided. The availability of the XYXZ genome will lay a strong foundation for both basic rice research and breeding by design.

Result

De novo assembly of XYXZ genome sequence

The genome of indica rice cultivar XYXZ was sequenced on Illumina PE150 platform and generated 158.7 million raw reads, equivalent to 47.62 Gb (~ 110× coverage) pair-end reads. We estimated the genome size of XYXZ using k-mer frequency distribution (k = 17). The estimated size of the genome was 420.7 Mb, with a 0.07% heterozygous rate and 47.16% repeat rate. Subsequently, high-quality paired-end reads were assembled into scaffold using SOAPdenovo [18] with k-mer =41). The XYXZ assembly had 160,915 scaffolds in total, the maximum length and the N50 of the scaffolds were 144,615 bp and 12,179 bp (Table 1).

Table 1 Statistics for XYXZ genome assembly

To fill the gaps in the draft genome assembly of XYXZ, we sequenced the XYXZ genome using PacBio Sequel II platform with 20× coverage and acquired 230.57 Gb subreads (Table S1). However, we tried to assemble the genome with different software or version yet fail in obtaining an ideal contig N50 (Table S2). We suspected large structural variations (SVs), or long repeat sequences could be important reasons causing smaller contig N50 in the genome assembly. Thus, Illumina short reads were mapped onto the rice genome of the indica cultivar Shuhui498 and the japonica cultivar Nipponbare [19, 20]. It resulted in a high mapping rate of 99.29 and 98.69%, respectively (Table S3), which indicated no large SVs existed in the XYXZ genome since the mapping rate should not reach 95% due to the formation of large gaps. To evaluate the assembly continuity, we introduced the LAI metric (LTR assembly index) which is independent of genome size, genomic LTR content, and gene space evaluation metrics [21]. The LAI of the draft XYXZ genome was 21.19 (LAI ≥ 20, gold quality), in other words, LTRs were well assembled. The insertion size of SMART library was about 20 kb. Is it possible that the XYXZ genome contained LTRs longer than 20 kb where SMART sequencing could not stride across?

To confirm the above hypothesis and consider the short length of contig might cause a disadvantage to the subsequent gene structure prediction and exchange rate calculation, we carried out Nanopore sequencing using the PromethION platform of Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) which provided longer reads. The resulting subreads size was 33.45 Gb covering ~ 83.63 × of the genome. The mean and the N50 of the reads’ length were 29,477 bp and 47,718 bp. The reads were assembled with nextdenovo (https://github.com/Nextomics) and corrected with Racon [22] producing error corrected contigs amounting to 1,134,686. The assembled contigs were merged with the Illumina clean reads for further error correction using Pilon [23]. This process yielded assembly results with a contig/scaffold N50 length of 25.59 Mb and a total length of 395.04 Mb (Table 1).

The completeness and accuracy of this genome were assessed with three approaches. First, we used the software tool BUSCO [24], which indicated that 1596 (98.9%) of the 1614 highly conserved core proteins in the embryophyta lineage were revealed. Second, CEGMA [25] showed 245 (98.79%) of 248 core eukaryotic genes were present in our XYXZ genome. Third, we mapped all the high-quality reads from short-insert-size libraries back to the assembly using BWA (Burrows-Wheeler Aligner) [26], it showed good alignments with an average mapping rate of 99.6% and coverage of 99.56% (Table S4). Taken together, these results indicated that the genome assembly is of high quality.

Hi-C (High-throughput chromosome conformation capture) was employed to assist in assembling the contigs/scaffolds to chromosome scale. Finally, the scaffolds were constructed into 12 pseudochromosomes with a 99.21% mounting rate, with only 3.11 Mb unplaced sequences. The sequence length of the pseudochromosomes ranges from 25,015,458 bp to 44,279,745 bp (Fig. 1, Table 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Hi-C scaffolding of the XYXZ genome. Hi-C interaction matrices show the pairwise correlations between ordered scaffolds along the 12 pseudomolecules. The intensity of the dark color is proportional to the strength of the correlation

Table 2 Basic sequence statistics of XYXZ

Gene annotation and repeat analysis

We employed a combined strategy to identify repeats in the genome based on homology alignment and de novo search. Tandem Repeat and repeat regions were extracted using TRF (http://tandem.bu.edu/trf/trf.html) and RepeatMasker software (http://www.repeatmasker.org), respectively. Raw TE library was predicted with LTR_FINDER [27], RepeatScout, and RepeatModeler. The annotation showed that approximately 44.89% (177.33 Mb) of non-redundant regions of the assembled genome consisted of repeat sequences (Table S5).

Three methods were employed to predict protein-coding genes of the XYXZ genome, including ab initio prediction, homology-based, and RNA-seq-aided gene predictions. For ab initio gene prediction, Augustus (http://augustus.gobics.de/), GlimmerHMM (http://ccb.jhu.edu/software/glimmerhmm), SNAP [28], Geneid [29], Genscan [30] software were adopted, and each predictor was trained with the RNA-seq dataset acquired from 4 tissues (root, stem, leaf, panicle) in advance. Five well-annotated rice varieties including three Oryza sativa ssp. indica (MH63, R498, ZS97), Nipponbare (Oryza sativa ssp. japonica), and O. rufipogon were taken as homologous to conduct homology-based gene prediction. All genes’ structures obtained from the above methods were combined using EVidenceModeler (http://EVidenceModeler.github.io). In total, 39,722 protein-coding genes were predicted in the XYXZ genome. Interestingly, the average transcript length of XYXZ is 2986 bp, which is longer than other cultivated rice while shorter than Oryza rufipogon, and so is the average intron length. The average exons per gene in XYXZ is also larger (Fig. S1, Table S6). Approximately 96.08% (38,164) of these gene models were supported by RNA-seq and/or homologous proteins (Fig. S2).

Next, we aligned the predicted protein sequences to Swiss-Prot protein databases, Non-Redundant (NR), the Integrated Resource of Protein Domains and Functional Sites (InterPro), and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database for gene functions inference. We also identified motifs and domains within the genes using PFAM database. In total, 92.30% of predicted protein-coding genes could be functionally annotated (Tabel S7).

Non-coding RNA genes including transfer RNA (tRNA) genes, ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes, small nuclear RNA (snRNA) genes, and microRNA (miRNA) genes were known to be involved in important biological processes. We used tRNAscan-SE program (http://lowelab.ucsc.edu/tRNAscan-SE/) to predict tRNAs. And the highly conserved rRNAs were predicted using Blast with relative species’ rRNA sequences as references. For miRNAs and snRNAs, we employed the infernal software (http://infernal.janelia.org/) to search against the Rfam database with default parameters. A total of 6728 miRNA genes, 638 tRNA genes, 1468 rRNA genes, and 1374 snRNA genes in the XYXZ genome were annotated (Table S8).

Genomic variations between XYXZ and other rice varieties

Based on predicted protein-coding genes, we identified 22,731 gene families in XYXZ. Through the clustering analysis with 15 other Oryza genomes, a total of 53,515 gene families were clustered. Among them, 6985 gene families were found in all Oryza genomes. Single-copy genes count 63.32% (25,151 genes) of the protein-coding genes in XYXZ (Fig. 2A). Over 70% of gene families (16,528) were shared by Oryza granulate and Nipponbare (Fig. 2B). We identified 858 gene families (2505 genes) that are only present in XYXZ but are absent in the other two genomes. Analysis of GO terms for these specific families revealed that several functional pathways involved in negative regulation of translation (GO:0017148), Box C/D RNP complex (GO:0031428), and RNA glycosylase activity (GO:0030597) are enriched in XYXZ (Table S9). Phylogenetic analyses showed that XYXZ had a close relationship with R498 (Fig. 2C).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Comparative genomics analysis between XYXZ and other Oryza species. A Gene family comparison between XYXZ and other Oryza species. B Venn diagram showing common and unique gene families between XYXZ, Nipponbare, and O. granulata. C Phylogenetic tree for XYXZ. Phylogenetic tree constructed with 3740 single-copy gene families in the maximum likelihood method. D Scatterplots showing the enriched aroma-related GO biological process of positively selected genes in XYXZ

The expansion and contraction gene families of XYXZ were estimated using CAFE. A total of 2940 genes expanded in XYXZ, while the contracted genes were 642 (Tables S10 and S11). Significantly expanded families (p ≤ 0.05) were clustered in the GO items. Among the expanded genes, the most enriched molecular function was carbohydrate binding (GO:0030246) (Table S12). As for contracted genes, the most enriched molecular function was catalytic activity (GO:0003824) (Table S13). These genes may be involved in specific phenotypes and environmental adaptability.

In addition, we used MUSCLE software (http://www.drive5.com/muscle/) and branch-site model in PAML software to detect signals of positive selection on genes involved in adaptive divergence and/or human selection in XYXZ, and the five closely related rice genomes of R498, Nagina22, ZS97, MH63, and IR64 were served as background branches. As a result, 703 positive selective genes were identified (Table S14). Aroma is one of the excellent qualities of XYXZ, over 300 compounds have been recognized from aromatic rice including lipids, aldehydes, heterocycles, alcohols, and phenols [2]. Sixty-six of the positive selective genes were annotated to be involved in the heterocycle metabolic process, such as lipoyl synthase, methyltransferase, and pyridoxal kinase. It suggests that these genes may have undergone artificial selection during the breeding (Fig. 2D).

Transposable elements in XYXZ

TEs are widely spread in the plant genome and provide a rich source of new genes and a regulatory sequence [16]. Given the important role of TEs, we extend the analysis of TEs in XYXZ and made a comparison to that of its close relative Oryza. The six genomes contain a similar amount of transposable elements ranging from 51.63 to 56.94% of the total genome length (54.34% for XYXZ) (Table 3, Table S15). These TEs are classified into 12 superfamilies according to the hierarchical TE classification system [28]. In the XYXZ genome, approximately 70% of the TEs are classified into class I elements (retrotransposon). The percentages of each TEs superfamilies between XYXZ and R498 are close. For example, XYXZ had 22.67 and 4.75% LTR/Gypsy and LTR/Copia, respectively, while R498 had 21.72 and 4.77%, respectively (Table 3). Despite the similar content of LTRs in the genomes, their distribution is varied. Figure 3 shows the distribution of Copia and Gypsy LTRs in the XYXZ, R498, and Nipponbare genomes.

Table 3 The characteristics of TEs in the genomes of XYXZ, R498, and Nipponbare
Fig. 3
figure 3

Distribution of LTRs (Copia and Gypsy) along the chromosomes of the XYXZ, R498, and Nipponbare. Tracks from the outer to inner circles indicate the following: 1, Chromosome; 2, All predicted LTRs in Nipponbare; 3, All predicted LTRs in R498; 4, All predicted LTRs in XYXZ; 5, LTRs with complete structure in XYXZ; 6, Predicted genes in XYXZ. A Copia. B Gypsy

TEs are closely related to the variation of genetic traits, the insertions of TEs contain the potential for both genetic and epigenetic influences on the flanking genes [29]. The insertion of TEs into coding regions may cause direct influences on gene function, in addition, they also may insert into existing regulatory regions or create new regulatory elements, resulting in altered gene expression [30]. A typical LTR retrotransposon contains specific signals for packaging, dimerization, reverse transcription, and integration [28]. It can be inferred that the expression of those flanking genes might be affected by the LTRs. Since the identification of LTRs was based on the presence of characteristic LTRs, we filter the structural uncomplete LTRs to further investigate LTRs in XYXZ. Out of these sets, 4362 complete LTRs were found, consisting of 2818 LTR/Gypsy, 643 LTR/Copia, and 901 LTR/Other (Fig. S3). Six hundred and seventy-four of these LTRs are located within 1 kb upstream of 569 genes while 655 LTRs position downstream of 646 genes (Table S16). Thirty-one of these flanking genes had been functionally studied, mainly relating to plant morphogenesis, stress response, nutrient utilization, and rice quality (Table 4). Half of the plant morphogenesis genes participate in internode length and lignin biosynthesis, expression of these genes might be regulated by the flanking LTRs and thereby affect the stem strength of XYXZ. The result shows that 8 stress/resistance genes are involved in biotic stress (including blast resistance, leaf blight resistance, and stripe disease resistance) and abiotic stress (including heat resistance, drought tolerance, and salt stress response). In terms of nutrient utilization, three genes related to the iron content and phosphate content locate downstream and two nitrogen-utilize genes are situated upstream of complete LTRs.

Table 4 Some cloned genes containing complete LTR in their 1 kb flanking regions

Five of the LTR flanking genes are related to rice quality regulating grain shape, filling process, and/or endosperm substance. To visually display the location relationship between LTRs and these genes, we compared their structure models among XYXZ, Nipponbare, and R498 (Fig. 4). AL1 is an aleurone layer and/or transfer cell-specific gene, only expressed in the aleurone layer of immature seeds [31]. According to our analysis, a complete LTR/Gypsy is located within 1 kb upstream of AL1 in XYXZ which is absent in the other two varieties. OsGS1;3 is one of the glutamine synthetases in rice, NF-YC12 is directly bound to its promoters to regulate endosperm development and the accumulation of storage substances in rice seeds [32, 33]. An LTR/Other inserts in the upstream of OsGS1;3 in XYXZ and R498, no such insertion was found in Nipponbare. OsPK2 regulates rice endosperm starch synthesis, compound granule formation, and grain filling [34]. An LTR/Gypsy was found downstream of OsPK2 in XYXZ which does not produce a good alignment in Nipponbare, no corresponding gene of OsPK2 is predicted in R498. GGC2 determines grain size in rice [35], the structure model in the two indica rice are identical, however, the sequence of TE090939 (LTR/Gypsy) is not completely matched in Nipponbare genome region. PDIL1–1 controls endosperm development through regulation of the amount and composition of seed proteins in rice [36]. The three varieties contain the same LTR/Gypsy upstream of PDIL1–1.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The structure characteristics of several quality-related genes in genomes of XYXZ, R498, and Nipponbare. AL1 (Aleurone layer and/or transfer cell-specific gene); OsGS1;3 (Glutamine synthetase); OsPK2 (Plastidic pyruvate kinase); GGC2 (G protein gamma subunit); PDIL1–1 (Protein disulphide isomerase-like enzyme)

Discussion

As a genomic model crop species for monocots and the main staple food for humans, rice genetics has aroused great interest [37]. It has become clear that one single genome is not enough to represent the huge amount of variation in rice genomes [38]. The previously published de novo assemblies, for example, Nipponbare and 93–11, had facilitated the scientific research and breeding of rice in aspects of yield, disease resistance, and stress resistance, while inadequate in rice quality.

Here we report the de novo assembly and annotation of XYXZ, a south China cultivar rice with excellent appearance and eating quality. The total length of the assembly is 395.04 Mb, we predicted that the XYXZ genome contains 39,722 protein-coding genes (Table S6). The availability of a high-quality genome and annotation for XYXZ will be useful for associating traits of interest with genetic variations, and for identifying the genes controlling those traits, especially in rice quality.

XYXZ also contains ultra-long LTRs in its genome. SMART and Nanopore are third-generation sequencing technology and are increasingly used in many different research areas [39]. They rely on different principles, assembly with either PacBio or Nanopore reads, followed by polishing with Illumina reads, which facilitated high-quality genome reconstruction [40]. We chose PacBio at first for it had been successfully used in several Oryza genomes [7, 9, 20, 41, 42]. We assembled several version draft genomes using Illumina and PacBio reads, but all of them were far from satisfactory for the small size in contig N50 (Table S2). However, no large SVs existed in the XYXZ genome (Table S3), and LAI indicated that LTRs were well assembled. Thus, we proposed the XYXZ genome may contain many ultra-long LTRs that PacBio read length could not stride over. Subsequently, we employed Nanopore sequencing to confirm the hypothesis and acquired assembly with contig N50 up to 25.59 Mb (Table 1). We found 4362 complete LTRs in the XYXZ genome (Fig. S3), 361 of which were longer than 19.2 kb, some of them even reached 38 kb (Fig. S4). The genetic and biological function of these ultra-long LTRs remains to be resolved. In comparison with other rice cultivars, the XYXZ genome does have special features. Although the CDS length in the genome of XYXZ is similar to that in other rice reference genomes, the protein-coding genes in XYXZ have larger-sized transcripts and introns, and more exons per gene (Fig. S1, Table S6). Compared with other rice reference genomes, we detected more or longer LTR types of TEs in some genes of the XYXZ genome (Fig. 4). In addition, we screened the genome and found 5466 ultra-long genes (≥5918 bp, double the average transcript length). Among these genes, 540 are inserted by complete LTRs (Fig. S5). The insertion of TEs may result in large transcripts and introns in genome evolution [43, 44], which may be one of the factors for special gene features in XYXZ.

We identify 1215 genes closely flanked (within 1 kb) by complete LTRs in their regulatory regions (Table S16), expression of these genes is probably under control by the TEs. Evidence had been shown that LTRs may provide regulatory activity [43,44,45,46]. The color of the black-skin grape is determined by the accumulation of anthocyanins, an LTR insertion upstream of VvmybA1 blocks the expression of the gene and gives rise to the white-skin grape [43]. In blood orange, an LTR/Copia insertion at 5’UTR of Ruby provides regulatory sequences for initiating the expression of the Ruby and promoting cold-dependent expression of the gene, thereby, facilitating anthocyanin production in the fruits [44]. In XYXZ genome, five genes related to rice quality are closely adjacent to LTRs (Fig. 4). We surmise these LTRs could have a potential regulatory effect on rice quality genes, thereby affecting the appearance quality and cooking quality of XYXZ. It is known that the genetic network that determines quality traits in rice is complex with low heritability and is generally vulnerable to environmental impacts. The expressions of TE families are highly dynamic across both tissues and genotypes. Regulatory elements within TEs have been shown to influence the expression of nearby genes, either through acting as enhancers or creating merged transcripts initiated within the TE [46]. Besides, the epigenetic trade-off between TE and the proximal gene could also influence the expression of both [47]. The existence of TEs might provide hints for why quality traits suffer from large environmental effects. More studies need to be conducted in the future to elucidate the details of the regulatory relationship. It is noteworthy that the structure model of these genes in the three cultivars is not completely consistent, which not only enriches the genetic diversity of the genes but simultaneously, makes the regulatory mechanism even more complicated.

Conclusions

The good quality genome sequence produced in the study will facilitate the biological research at the genomic level, especially for the deep mining of genetic variations in rice quality traits, and provide more information for genome-based molecular breeding in rice.

Methods

Plant materials and DNA/RNA extraction

Collection of plant material and all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines/regulations/legislation. The cultivar XiangYaXiangZhan (Oryza sativa ssp. indica) was grown in the greenhouse of the Rice Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China. Healthy and fresh tissues were harvested from the best-grown individual plant 2 months after being transplanted. For WGS sequencing, high-quality genomic DNA was extracted from leaves with a Plant DNeasy kit (Qiagen, USA). The extracted DNA was then electrophoresis on a 0.8% agarose gel and detected using a Qubit fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) for examination of quality and quantity. Total RNA from root, stem, leaves, and panicle were isolated using Invitrogen TRIzol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA).

Short-insert library preparation and sequencing

Genomic DNA was randomly interrupted into about 350 bp fragments using S220 Focused-ultrasonicator (Covaris, USA). Then the PE library was prepared with NEB Next® Ultra DNA Library Prep Kit (NEB, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA isolated from different tissues were used to prepare strand-specific RNA seq libraries with TruSeq Stranded Total RNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina, USA). Libraries were sequenced by the Illumina NovaSeq PE150 platforms (Illumina, USA).

The raw data were filtered by removing adapter and low-quality reads. The short reads were assembled into contigs and then scaffold using Soapdenovo [18] and k-mer. Genome size was estimated from the k-mer using JellyFish-2.2.10 with a k-mer size of 17 (contig scale) and 41 (scaffold scale), respectively.

PacBio sequencing and genome assembling

DNA of XYXZ was sheared to ~ 20 kb targeted size, followed by damage repair and end repair, blunt-end adaptor ligation, and size selection. Finally, the libraries are sequenced on the PacBio sequel instrument. Around 12 million subreads (Tabel S1) were used for assembly with FALCON v1, FALCON v2, Canu, hicanu, hifiasm v1, and hifiasm v2 to generate the contig.

Nanopore sequencing and genome assembling

High-quality genome DNA was sheared using Covaris® g-TUBE™ device (Covaris, USA), and followed by repairing DNA damage. The DNA library for MinION sequencing was prepared with Rapid Sequencing Kit (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, UK). Then, the sequencing was performed on the PromethION platform (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, UK). Packages including Canu v2.0, wtdbg v2.5, Smartdenovo v1.0, Nextdenovo v2.2 (https://github.com/Nextomics), and Racon v1.3.1 [22] were employed to conduct the genome assembling. Short reads obtained from PE150 platforms were used to correct the assembled contigs with pilon v1.22 [23]. The completeness and accuracy of the genome were assessed with BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) [24], CEGMA (Core Eukaryotic Genes Mapping Approach) [25], and BWA (Burrows-Wheeler Aligner) [26].

Hi-C sequencing and chromosomal architecture

At first, the Leaf sample was ground with liquid nitrogen and cross-linked with a 4% formaldehyde solution for 30 min. Then, 2.5 M glycine was added to stop the cross-linking reaction and neutralize the remaining formaldehyde. The nuclei were digested with the DpnII restriction enzyme. The sticky ends of the digested fragments were labeled with biotin − 14-dCTP and re-ligated by T4 DNA polymerase. Next, the DNA fragments were sheared by ultrasonicator to a size of 200-600 bp. The biotin-labeled DNA fragments were enriched and then amplified by PCR to produce the Hi-C sequencing library. The Hi-C library was sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq PE150 platform. The chromosomal-scale genome was assembled using ALLHiC [48] based on Hi-C data.

Genome annotation

As modified based on the method reported by Du et al. [20], tandem repeat was extracted using TRF v4.09 (http://tandem.bu.edu/trf/trf.html) by ab initio prediction. The homolog prediction commonly used Repbase [49] database employing RepeatMasker v4.1.0 (http://www.repeatmasker.org) software and its in-house scripts (RepeatProteinMask) with default parameters to extract repeat regions. LTR_FINDER [27], RepeatScout v1.0.5 [50], RepeatModeler v2.0.1 were employed to build de novo repetitive elements database with default parameters. Repeat sequences (with lengths > 100 bp and gap ‘N’ less than 5%) in the database constituted a raw TE library. The de novo TE library together with Repbase was supplied to uclust to produce a non-redundant library. DNA-level repeat identification was carried out by RepeatMasker.

The gene structure de novo annotation was made using Augustus v3.2.3 (http://augustus.gobics.de/), Genscan v1.0 [30], Glimmer v3.0.4 (http://ccb.jhu.edu/software/glimmerhmm), Snap v2013.11.29 [28], and Geneid v1.4 [29]. Homology-based method was also employed to annotate the protein-coding gene structure. We built a non-redundant protein database of O. indica (MH63, R498, ZS97), Nipponbare (O. japonica), and O. rufipogon. Then the protein sequences were aligned to the genome by Blastall v2.2.26 (E-value cutoff by 1E-5). The blast hits were conjoined by solar. For each blast hit, Genewise was used to predict the exact gene structure in the corresponding genomic regions. RNA-seq data were mapped to the genome using Tophat v 2.0.13 (https://tophat.com). Then, cufflinks v 2.1.1 (http://cufflinks.cbcb.umd.edu/) was used to assemble transcripts to gene models. EVidenceModeler (http://EVidenceModeler.github.io) was used to combine all genes’ structures.

The tRNAs were predicted using the program tRNAscan-SE v1.4 (http://lowelab.ucsc.edu/tRNAscan-SE). Blast v2.2.26 was used to predict rRNA sequences. Other ncRNAs, including miRNAs, snRNAs were identified by searching against the Rfam v14.1 database with default parameters using the infernal software (http://infernal.janelia.org/).

Gene family evolution analysis

OthoMCL was used to identify gene families in O.brachyantha, O. glaberrima, O. granulate, O. longistaminata, O. punctata, O. rufipogon, Nipponbare, R498, MH63, IR64, kasalath, kitaake, ZS97, PA46S, Nagina22. For multiple-transcript genes, only the transcript with the longest coding region was reserved. And filter out the genes encoding protein less than 50 amino acids or those with stop codons inside. The similar relationship between protein sequences of all Oryza was obtained through all vs all blast p, with default E value. The inflation of OthoMCL was 1.5.

A total of 3740 single-copy gene families are subject to MUSCLE (http://www.drive5.com/muscle/) for multi-sequence alignment, and then combine all the alignment results to form a super alignment matrix. The sequence alignment result was used to construct phylogenetic tree by RAxML (http://sco.hits.org/exelixis/web/software/raxml/index.html) with the maximum likelihood method.

Filter gene families with abnormal gene numbers in individual Oryza, the rest gene families were imported into CAFE software (http://sourceforge.net/projects/cafehahnlab) to analyze the amplification and contraction of gene families (family-wide P-value< 0.05 and Viterbi P-values< 0.05). MUSCLE was used to analyze positive selective genes in XYXZ with default parameters.

Availability of data and materials

Sequencing data generated for this project are achieved at National Genomics Data Center (NGDC) with BioProject number PRJCA012191, under accession code CRA008357.

Abbreviations

XYXZ:

Xiangyaxiangzhan

R498:

Shuhui498

ZS97:

Zhenshan97

MH63:

Minghui63

TEs:

Transposable elements

CRL:

Continuous long reads

CCS:

Circular consensus sequencing

SVs:

Structural variations

LTRs:

Long terminal repeat retrotransposons

ONT:

Oxford nanopore technologies

Hi-C:

High-throughput chromosome conformation capture

NR:

Non-Redundant

InterPro:

Protein domains and functional sites

KEGG:

Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes

tRNA:

Transfer RNA

rRNA:

Ribosomal RNA

snRNA:

Small nuclear RNA

miRNA:

MicroRNA

References

  1. Fei C, Xu Q, Xu Z, Chen W. Effect of rice breeding process on improvement of yield and quality in China. Rice Sci. 2020;27(5):11.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Prodhan ZH, Shu Q. Rice aroma: a natural gift comes with price and the way forward. Rice Sci. 2020;27(2):86–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li P, Chen YH, Lu J, Zhang CQ, Liu QQ, Li QF. Genes and their molecular functions determining seed structure, components, and quality of rice. Rice. 2022;15(1):18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao C, Zhao L, Zhao Q, Chen T, Yao S, Zhu Z, et al. Genetic dissection of eating and cooking qualities in different subpopulations of cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.) through association mapping. BMC Genet. 2020;21(1):119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang W, Mauleon R, Hu Z, Chebotarov D, Tai S, Wu Z, et al. Genomic variation in 3,010 diverse accessions of Asian cultivated rice. Nature. 2018;557(7703):43–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Li JY, Wang J, Zeigler RS. The 3,000 rice genomes project: new opportunities and challenges for future rice research. Gigascience. 2014;3:8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang Q, Liang Z, Cui X, Ji C, Li Y, Zhang P, et al. N6-methyladenine DNA methylation in japonica and indica rice genomes and its association with gene expression, plant development, and stress responses. Mol Plant. 2018;11(12):17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Du H, Liang C. Assembly of chromosome-scale contigs by efficiently resolving repetitive sequences with long reads. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):5360.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Song JM, Xie WZ, Wang S, Guo YX, Koo DH, Kudrna D, et al. Two gap-free reference genomes and a global view of the centromere architecture in rice. Mol Plant. 2021;14(10):1757–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shi C, Li W, Zhang Q, Zhang Y, Tong Y, Li K, et al. The draft genome sequence of an upland wild rice species, Oryza granulata. Sci Data. 2020;7(1):131.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Li W, Li K, Zhang QJ, Zhu T, Zhang Y, Shi C, et al. Improved hybrid de novo genome assembly and annotation of African wild rice, Oryza longistaminata, from Illumina and PacBio sequencing reads. Plant Genome-US. 2020;13(1):e20001.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang CR, Burns KH, Boeke JD. Active transposition in genomes. Annu Rev Genet. 2012;46:651–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sahebi M, Hanafi MM, van Wijnen AJ, Rice D, Rafii MY, Azizi P, et al. Contribution of transposable elements in the plant's genome. Gene. 2018;665:155–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaessmann H, Vinckenbosch N, Long M. RNA-based gene duplication: mechanistic and evolutionary insights. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10(1):19–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Fedoroff NV. Transposable elements, epigenetics, and genome evolution. Science. 2012;338(6108):758–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lisch D. How important are transposons for plant evolution? Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14(1):49–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Thomma B, Seidl MF, Shi-Kunne X, Cook DE, Bolton MD, van Kan J, et al. Mind the gap; seven reasons to close fragmented genome assemblies. Fungal Genet Biol. 2016;90:24–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W, Yuan J, et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience. 2012;1(1):18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kawahara Y, de la Bastide M, Hamilton JP, Kanamori H, McCombie WR, Ouyang S, et al. Improvement of the Oryza sativa Nipponbare reference genome using next generation sequence and optical map data. Rice. 2013;6(1):4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Du H, Yu Y, Ma Y, Gao Q, Cao Y, Chen Z, et al. Sequencing and de novo assembly of a near complete indica rice genome. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15324.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ou S, Chen J, Jiang N. Assessing genome assembly quality using the LTR assembly index (LAI). Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(21):e126.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Vaser R, Sovic I, Nagarajan N, Sikic M. Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads. Genome Res. 2017;27(5):737–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e112963.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Simao FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(19):3210–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Parra G, Bradnam K, Korf I. CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(9):1061–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with burrows-wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(5):589–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu Z, Wang H. LTR_FINDER: an efficient tool for the prediction of full-length LTR retrotransposons. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(Web Server issue):W265–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Wicker T, Sabot F, Hua-Van A, Bennetzen JL, Capy P, Chalhoub B, et al. A unified classification system for eukaryotic transposable elements. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8(12):973–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Noshay JM, Marand AP, Anderson SN, Zhou P, Mejia GM, Lu Z, et al. Assessing the regulatory potential of transposable elements using chromatin accessibility profiles of maize transposons. Genetics. 2021;217(1):1–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chuong EB, Elde NC, Feschotte C. Regulatory activities of transposable elements: from conflicts to benefits. Nat Rev Genet. 2017;18(2):71–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kuwano M, Masumura T, Yoshida KT. A novel endosperm transfer cell-containing region-specific gene and its promoter in rice. Plant Mol Biol. 2011;76(1–2):47–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Xiong Y, Ren Y, Li W, Wu F, Yang W, Huang X, et al. NF-YC12 is a key multi-functional regulator of accumulation of seed storage substances in rice. J Exp Bot. 2019;70(15):3765–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Tabuchi M, Sugiyama K, Ishiyama K, Inoue E, Sato T, Takahashi H, et al. Severe reduction in growth rate and grain filling of rice mutants lacking OsGS1;1, a cytosolic glutamine synthetase1;1. Plant J. 2005;42(5):641–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cai Y, Li S, Jiao G, Sheng Z, Wu Y, Shao G, et al. OsPK2 encodes a plastidic pyruvate kinase involved in rice endosperm starch synthesis, compound granule formation and grain filling. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018;16(11):1878–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Sun S, Wang L, Mao H, Shao L, Li X, Xiao J, et al. A G-protein pathway determines grain size in rice. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):851.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim YJ, Yeu SY, Park BS, Koh HJ, Song JT, Seo HS. Protein disulfide isomerase-like protein 1-1 controls endosperm development through regulation of the amount and composition of seed proteins in rice. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44493.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Sevanthi AMV, Kandwal P, Kale PB, Prakash C, Ramkumar MK, Yadav N, et al. Whole genome characterization of a few EMS-induced mutants of upland rice variety Nagina 22 reveals a staggeringly high frequency of SNPs which show high phenotypic plasticity towards the wild-type. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1179.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Nie S, Liu Y, Wang C, Gao S, Xu T, Liu Q, et al. Assembly of an early-matured japonica (Geng) rice genome, Suijing18, based on PacBio and Illumina sequencing. Sci Data. 2017;4(1):170195.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Cui J, Shen N, Lu Z, Xu G, Wang Y, Jin B. Analysis and comprehensive comparison of PacBio and nanopore-based RNA sequencing of the Arabidopsis transcriptome. Plant Methods. 2020;16:85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang P, Jiang D, Wang Y, Yao X, Luo Y, Yang Z. Comparison of de novo assembly strategies for bacterial genomes. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(14):7668.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Tanaka T, Nishijima R, Teramoto S, Kitomi Y, Hayashi T, Uga Y, et al. De novo genome assembly of the indica rice variety IR64 using linked-read sequencing and nanopore sequencing. G3-Genes Genom Genet. 2020;10(5):1495–501.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Jain R, Jenkins J, Shu S, Chern M, Martin JA, Copetti D, et al. Genome sequence of the model rice variety KitaakeX. BMC Genomics. 2019;20(1):905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Kobayashi S, Goto-Yamamoto N, Hirochika H. Retrotransposon-induced mutations in grape skin color. Science. 2004;304(5673):982.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Butelli E, Licciardello C, Zhang Y, Liu J, Mackay S, Bailey P, et al. Retrotransposons control fruit-specific, cold-dependent accumulation of anthocyanins in blood oranges. Plant Cell. 2012;24(3):1242–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Makarevitch I, Waters AJ, West PT, Stitzer M, Hirsch CN, Ross-Ibarra J, et al. Transposable elements contribute to activation of maize genes in response to abiotic stress. PLoS Genet. 2015;11(1):e1004915.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Anderson SN, Stitzer MC, Zhou P, Ross-Ibarra J, Hirsch CD, Springer NM. Dynamic patterns of transcript abundance of transposable element families in maize. G3-Genes Genom Genet. 2019;9(11):3673–82.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Choi JY, Purugganan MD. Evolutionary epigenomics of retrotransposon-mediated methylation spreading in rice. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35(2):365–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang X, Zhang S, Zhao Q, Ming R, Tang H. Assembly of allele-aware, chromosomal-scale autopolyploid genomes based on Hi-C data. Nat Plants. 2019;5(8):833–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Bao W, Kojima KK, Kohany O. Repbase update, a database of repetitive elements in eukaryotic genomes. Mob DNA. 2015;6:12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Price AL, Jones NC, Pevzner PA. De novo identification of repeat families in large genomes. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(Suppl 1):i351–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the Reginal Collaboration R&D Program of Sichuan Province (2021YFQ0020), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2021A1515110294), the Special Fund of Scientific Innovation Strategy-Construction of High-Level Academy of Agriculture Science (R2021YJ-YB3001 and R2020QD-004), and the Guangdong Key Laboratory of New Technology in Rice Breeding (2020B1212060047).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J. L. performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. L.K. performed the experiments. X. H. provided critical assessments for the manuscript. C.F. and S.B. designed the research and analyzed the data. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chongyun Fu or Song Bai.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Statistics for SMART Sequencing.

Additional file 2: Table S2.

Statistics for draft genome assembled using Pacbio data.

Additional file 3: Table S3.

Mapping rate of XYXZ Illumina short reads to R498 and Nipponbare.

Additional file 4: Table S4.

Evaluation of assembly results.

Additional file 5: Table S5.

Statistics for repeat sequence.

Additional file 6: Figure S1.

Distribution of gene structure length.

Additional file 7: Table S6.

Statistics for gene structure annotation.

Additional file 8: Figure S2.

Venn diagram showing gene function annotation.

Additional file 9: Table S8.

Statistics for non-coding RNA.

Additional file 10: Table S9.

GO terms for specific families in XYXZ.

Additional file 11: Table S10.

Expenssion genes in XYXZ.

Additional file 12: Table S11.

Contraction genes in XYXZ.

Additional file 13: Table S12.

Enriched GO terms for expansion genes in XYXZ.

Additional file 14: Table S13.

Enriched GO terms for contraction genes in XYXZ.

Additional file 15: Table S14.

Positively selected genes in XYXZ.

Additional file 16: Table S15.

Statistics for TEs in 9311, MH63, and ZS97 genomes.

Additional file 17: Figure S3.

Complete LTRs in XYXZ genome.

Additional file 18: Table S16.

Complete LTRs and the flanking gene (within 1 kb) location in XYXZ genome.

Additional file 19: Figure S4.

Length distribution of complete LTRs in XYXZ.

Additional file 20: Figure S5.

Distribution of ultra-long genes in XYXZ genome.

Additional file 21: Table S7.

Statistics for gene function annotation.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liang, J., Kong, L., Hu, X. et al. Chromosomal-level genome assembly of the high-quality Xian/Indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) Xiangyaxiangzhan. BMC Plant Biol 23, 94 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04114-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04114-0

Keywords