Skip to main content

Screening of differentially expressed microRNAs and target genes in two potato varieties under nitrogen stress

Abstract

Background

A reasonable supply of nitrogen (N) fertilizer is essential for obtaining high-quality, high-level, and stable potato yields, and an improvement in the N utilization efficiency can effectively reduce N fertilizer use. It is important to use accurate, straightforward, and efficient transgenic breeding techniques for the identification of genes that can improve nitrogen use efficiency, thus enabling us to achieve the ultimate goal of breeding N-efficient potato varieties. In recent years, some of the mechanisms of miRNAs have been elucidated via the analysis of the correlation between the expression levels of potato miRNA target genes and regulated genes under conditions of stress, but the role of miRNAs in the inhibition/expression of key genes regulating N metabolism under N stress is still unclear. Our study aimed to identify the role played by specific enzymes and miRNAs in the responses of plants to N stress.

Results

The roots and leaves of the N-efficient potato variety, Yanshu4 ("Y"), and N-inefficient potato variety, Atlantic ("D"), were collected at the seedling and budding stages after they were exposed to different N fertilizer treatments. The miRNAs expressed differentially under the two types of N stress and their corresponding target genes were first predicted using miRNA and degradome analysis. Then, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed to verify the expression of differential miRNAs that were closely related to N metabolism. Finally, the shearing relationship between stu-miR396-5p and its target gene StNiR was determined by analyzing luciferase activity levels. The results showed that NiR activity increased significantly with an increase in the applied N levels from the seedling stage to the budding stage, and NiR responded significantly to different N treatments. miRNA sequencing enabled us to predict 48 families with conserved miRNAs that were mainly involved in N metabolism, carbon metabolism, and amino acid biosynthesis. The differences in the expression of the following miRNAs were identified via screening (high expression levels and P < 0.05): stu-miR396-5p, stu-miR408b-3p_R-1, stu-miR3627-3p, stu-miR482a-3p, stu-miR8036-3p, stu-miR482a-5p, stu-miR827-5p, stu-miR156a_L-1, stu-miR827-3p, stu-miR172b-5p, stu-miR6022-p3_7, stu-miR398a-5p, and stu-miR166c-5p_L-3. Degradome analysis showed that most miRNAs had many-to-many relationships with target genes. The main target genes involved in N metabolism were NiR, NiR1, NRT2.5, and NRT2.7. qRT-PCR analysis showed that there were significant differences in the expression levels of stu-miR396-5p, stu-miR8036-3p, and stu-miR482a-3p in the leaves and roots of the Yanshu4 and Atlantic varieties at the seedling and budding stages under conditions that involved no N and excessive N application; the expression of these miRNAs was induced in response to N stress. The correlation between the differential expression of stu-miR396-5p and its corresponding target gene NiR was further verified by determining the luciferase activity level and was found to be strongly negative.

Conclusion

The activity of NiR was significantly positively correlated with N application from the seedling to the budding stage. Differential miRNAs and target genes showed a many-to-many relationship with each other. The expression of stu-miR396-5p, stu-miR482a-3p, and stu-miR8036-3p in the roots and leaves of the Yanshu4 and Atlantic varieties at the seedling and budding stages was notably different under two types of N stress. Under two types of N stress, stu-miR396-5p was down-regulated in Yanshu4 in the seedling-stage and shoot-stage roots, and up-regulated in seedling-stage roots and shoot-stage leaves; stu-miR482a-3p was up-regulated in the seedling and shoot stages. The expression of stu-miR8036-3p was up-regulated in the leaves and roots at the seedling and budding stages, and down-regulated in roots under both types of N stress. The gene expressing the key enzyme involved in N metabolism, StNiR, and the stu-miR396-5p luciferase assay reporter gene had a strong regulatory relationship with each other. This study provides candidate miRNAs related to nitrogen metabolism and highlights that differential miRNAs play a key role in nitrogen stress in potato, providing insights for future research on miRNAs and their target genes in nitrogen metabolic pathways and breeding nitrogen-efficient potatoes.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is the fourth most commonly cultivated food crop worldwide [1]. Nitrogen (N) fertilizer application is closely related to potato quality and yield. In order to ensure high and stable yields, China's fertilizer input has accounted for 31% of the world's total in recent years, and four times the world’s average [2]. Excessive N application would not only lead to the phenomenon of "high fertilizer inefficiency", but also result in a negative impact on the environment and economy [3]. For example, excessive N application in maize is found to lead to water deficit, which in turn causes several problems, such as reduced fertilizer utilization and photosynthetic rate [4]. The improvement of the N use efficiency (NUE) of crops to obtain an equal or higher yield with a lower level of N is considered an effective method for solving this problem.

Studies have shown that the NUE of potato plants could be improved only to a limited extent via the selection of high-yielding varieties or soil management, and that it was difficult to make further improvements [5]. Therefore, by regulating the N stress in potato plants, the roles of differential microRNAs (miRNAs) and corresponding target genes involved in N metabolism pathways were analyzed, and the NUE of potato plants was improved, to achieve high and stable potato yields. According to previous studies, under N stress, nitrate transporter (NRT) protein, nitrate reductase (NR), glutamine synthase (GS), glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), and nitrite reductase (NiR) respond to different N treatments in two potato varieties [6]. NiR is the second enzyme involved in the nitrate reduction process, which directly reflects the nutritional status and N assimilation level of plants to a certain extent. The expression of StNiRs was found to be significantly different under different types of N treatment in potato plants, and the activity and expression of StNiR increased significantly with an increase in the N supply. This confirmed that StNiRs could be used to regulate N metabolism in potato plants during N uptake and assimilation. [7].

miRNAs are endogenous non-coding RNAs with regulatory functions that are approximately 18–25 nucleotides (nt) in length. The target gene is recognized by complementary base pairing, and the silencing complex degrades the target gene or inhibits its translation based on the degree of complementarity [8], Thus, miRNAs participate in many growth and development processes such as cell signal transduction and development, and generation of responses to biotic and abiotic stresses [9]. In barley and gramineous crops such as wheat and corn [10], miR396 is considered to be a metabolic sensor that regulates plant N balance [11]. miR169 and the target gene NFYA were reported to be significantly negatively regulated under N stress in maize [12]. miR174 and miR167 are involved in N signaling during root development [13], and miR156, miR166, and miR169 are up-regulated during plant growth under conditions of N deficiency [14]. The regulatory pattern of miR159-regulated target gene MYB and miR169-regulated target gene NFYA in potato drought stress has been confirmed [15]. Therefore, we speculate that the screened differential miRNAs and their target genes have regulatory relationships in N metabolism pathways, and that they work together to regulate N metabolism. In conventional crop production, 'YanShu4' is a high-absorption and high-utilization potato variety, while 'Atlantic' is a low-absorption and low-utilization potato variety [1]. Therefore, the two types of potatoes were not treated with N and were treated with excessive levels of N. The roots and leaves of the two types of potatoes at the seedling and budding stages were subjected to miRNA sequencing and degradome sequencing. In this study, a total of 1439 miRNAs were predicted; of these, 798 miRNAs had been reported previously, 349 miRNAs were novel, and 13 miRNAs that were closely related to N metabolism were mainly screened for conducting an in-depth study. The sequencing and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) results were verified, and the differences in miRNA expression levels under N stress were identified via screening. The responsiveness of the differential miRNAs under N stress as well as the differential expression in the two types of potato plants different periods and sites were clarified, in order to provide a theoretical basis for the further examination of N metabolism-related differential miRNAs and identification of their target genes. In this study, 13 candidate miRNAs related to nitrogen metabolism were screened by microRNA sequencing, and the binding site prediction and luciferase validation of NiR, a key gene in nitrogen metabolism pathway, and its corresponding miR396-5p confirmed the existence of a shearing relationship. The expression analysis revealed that the two genes are negatively regulated, which can be used as a reference for the subsequent studies.

Results

miRNA sequencing and analysis

The RNA sequences extracted from potato leaves and roots were sequenced, and the output raw sequencing data (Additional file 1, Table 1) were counted to obtain the unique sequence data and the copy number corresponding to each unique sequence. First, the 3' adapter sequence was excluded from the original sequencing data. Simultaneously, the sequence and target genes were compared to the Rfam (including rRNA, tRNA, snRNA, snoRNA, etc.) and Repbase databases and then filtered. The filtered data were called valid data, and they were processed further to facilitate miRNA alignment, identification, prediction, and analysis. Clear adapter trimming, quality trimming, read label unification, and mapping of data to Rfam were performed. Finally, clean reads were obtained after duplicate removing and read length filtering (size: 18–25 nt).

Based on the analysis and statistics of the original sequencing data, the statistical analysis of the length distribution of the clean data was performed. According to the typical characteristics of Dicer digestion, most of the data were distributed within 20–24 nt. Figure 1 shows the length distribution of miRNA clean reads obtained by miRNA sequencing under N stress; the results showed that the largest miRNAs were 25 nt in length, followed by miRNAs with a length of 24 nt.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Length distribution of miRNAs

Differential miRNA expression analysis

T-test was used to screen genes with significant differences and differentially expressed genes, with P <  = 0.05 as the threshold (see Additional file 1, Table 2 for details). miRNA sequencing enabled us to predict that there were 48 conserved miRNAs in a family. Based on the results of miRNA sequencing and degradome analysis, it was found that the differentially expressed miRNAs were involved in a large number of metabolic pathways and biological processes, and many of these miRNAs had a one-to-many relationship with target genes.

The overall distribution of differentially expressed miRNAs can be visualized by constructing volcano plots. It can be seen from Fig. 1 (in Additional file 2) that there were notable differences in the expression patterns in the leaves of the two types of potatoes without treatment with N at the germination stage. We performed a comparison of seedlings and budding stage leaves under excessive N application and no N application in two kinds of potato plants. Under conditions of excessive N application, the miRNA expression levels in leaves of the two kinds of potato plants were significantly up-regulated, and when N was not applied, the miRNA expression levels in leaves of the two kinds of potatoes were significantly down-regulated.

Statistical analysis of differentially up- and down-regulated miRNAs

Statistics of up- and down-regulated genes can determine the number of differentially expressed miRNAs under different experimental conditions. A comparison of miRNAs in different groups showed that the numbers of up- and down-regulated miRNAs in N-fertilized leaves were 151 and 181, respectively. The numbers of up- and down-regulated miRNAs in the corresponding non-N-treated leaves of the two potato plants were 146 and 180, respectively. No miRNAs were up-regulated in the roots at the seedling and budding stages in the Yanshu4 variety under excessive N application treatment, at the seedling and budding stages of the Atlantic variety under no N treatment, and at the budding stage of the Yanshu4 variety under both N treatments. Simultaneously, there were no up-regulated miRNAs in the leaves at the budding stage in the non-N treated Atlantic variety and in the roots of two kinds of non-N treated potato plants at the budding stage, as shown in Fig. 2 in Additional file 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Differences miRNAs corresponding target gene KEGG enrichment analysis number is the number of genes matched to a single KEGG with significant differences, B gene number is the number of genes matched to a single KEGG

Cluster analysis of differential miRNAs

Cluster expression models resulted in better and more intuitive cluster graphs. KEGG enrichment analysis of the target genes corresponding to differential miRNAs showed that stu-miR396-5p, stu-miR482a-3p, and stu-miR8036-3p were expressed in response to two types of N stress, in two potatoes, at two periods, and in two tissues. Under different N fertilization treatments, stu-miR482a-5p exhibited higher levels of expression in two periods and two tissues in the Atlantic variety.

The expression of stu-miR166c-5p_L-3 and stu-miR3627-3p was lower under both types of N stress, in two potatoes, at two periods, and in two tissues. stu-miR156a_L-1 was expressed at lower levels in the seedling stage of two kinds of non-N treated potatoes, in the seedling stage of the Atlantic variety under both types of N treatments, and non-N treated Atlantic roots at the budding and seedling stages. The expression of stu-miR172b-5p in two tissues at two periods in the Yanshu4 variety was lower under both N treatments.

Prediction and enrichment analysis of target genes corresponding to miRNAs

Target gene prediction of differential miRNAs

Target genes for miRNAs with significant differences were predicted using psRobot (v1.2) [16]. A target penalty strategy based on plants helped us to predict targets (the default threshold score was ≤ 2.5). We performed target gene prediction for differential miRNAs and extracted information regarding the target genes corresponding to miRNAs and obtained annotation information for the target genes using the GO and KEGG databases.

Target gene enrichment analysis of differential miRNAs

Enrichment analysis can be classified into two parts, i.e., GO functional annotation (Fig. 2), and KEGG pathway functional annotation (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

GO enrichment analysis of target genes corresponding to differential miRNAs

Our analysis revealed that stu-miR396-5p was involved in pathways associated with N metabolism, carbon metabolism, pyruvate metabolism, alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism, phytohormone biosynthesis, amino acid biosynthesis, and zeatin biosynthesis. Sixty-five target genes were predicted for stu-miR396-5p. stu-miR482a-5p was mainly involved in folate biosynthesis, glycerophosphate metabolism, and gluconate metabolism, and 12 target genes were predicted. The sequencing and analysis of stu-miR156a_L-1 revealed that it was mainly involved in biological processes and pathways associated with N metabolism, endoplasmic reticulum-related processes, RNA degradation, and ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation; 50 target genes were predicted. stu-miR172b-5p was mainly involved in pathways associated with starch and sucrose metabolism and arginine metabolism. stu-miR482a-5p was mainly involved in folate biosynthesis, glycerophosphate metabolism, and gluconate metabolism, and 12 target genes were predicted. The sequencing and analysis of stu-miR156a_L-1 revealed that it was mainly involved in biological processes and metabolic pathways associated with N metabolism, endoplasmic reticulum-related processes, and proline metabolism; 13 target genes were predicted. An analysis of stu-miR827-3p revealed that it was mainly involved in biological processes such as amino acid biosynthesis and phytohormone signaling; 31 target genes were predicted. An analysis of stu-miR408b-3p_R-1 revealed that it was mainly involved in metabolic pathways and biological processes such as N metabolism, carbon metabolism, ascorbic acid, and uric acid metabolism; 9 target genes were predicted. stu-miR3627-3p was found to be mainly involved in RNA transport, carbon metabolism, and other pathways, and 3 target genes were predicted. stu-miR482a-3p analysis revealed that the metabolic pathways were mainly involved in endocytosis, plant-pathogen interactions, and ubiquitin-mediated proteolytic metabolism; 14 target genes were predicted. stu-miR827-5p analysis revealed that it was mainly involved in amino acid sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism, plant-pathogen interactions, and glutathione metabolism-associated pathways; 9 target genes were predicted. stu-miR6022-p3_7 was found to be mainly involved in metabolic pathways and biological processes such as N metabolism, amino acid biosynthesis, and thiamine metabolism; 8 target genes were predicted. An analysis of stu-miR398a-5p revealed that it was mainly involved in metabolic pathways such as peroxisome, homologous recombination, and photosynthesis, and 4 target genes were predicted. stu-miR166c-5p_L-3 was mainly involved in metabolic pathways such as pyruvate metabolism, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, and valine, leucine, and isoleucine degradation, and 11 target genes were predicted.

GO has three ontologies that describe the molecular functions, cellular components, and associated biological processes, respectively (see Additional file 1, Table 4 for details).

GO enrichment analysis was performed to identify the top 20 annotations that were closely related to N metabolism. These included GO0003674 (molecular function), GO0003700 (DNA-binding transcription factor activity), GO0004674 (protein serine/threonine kinase activity), GO0005634 (nucleus), and GO0006355 (DNA template, transcriptional regulation). The results showed that the most annotated sequences were associated with the plasma membrane (GO0005886), defense response (GO0006952), and ATP binding (GO0005524). GO enrichment analysis of target genes corresponding to differential miRNAs showed that sequences associated with the defense response were the most annotated among those associated with the 25 biological processes, followed by biological processes. Sequences associated with the nucleus were the most annotated among the 15 cellular components, followed by the plasma membrane, and the 10 most annotated sequences were associated with molecular functions such as ATP binding, followed by protein binding. The top 20 annotations were closely related to N metabolism; these included KO00910 (N metabolism), KO01200 (carbon metabolism), KO04146 (peroxisome), KO00970 (amino acid biosynthesis), KO04075 (phytohormone signaling), KO04626, KO03040 (shear bodies), and KO04075 (phytohormone signaling), and were enriched for KEGG analysis. KEGG enrichment analysis showed that target genes were mainly enriched in phytopathogenic interactions (KO04626) and phytohormone signaling (KO04075).

Validation of differential miRNAs using qRT-PCR

Differential expression of miRNAs exposed to the same N treatment

As seen from the expression of differential miRNAs under the unappliednon-N-treatment in Fig. 4, LN_YLS processing conditions accounted for the largest proportion of differential expression of stu-miR396-5p and stu-miR156a_L-1, indicating that stu-miR396-5p and stu-miR156a_L-1 were most significantly expressed for LN_YLS under treatment; in LN_DLA, stu-miR408b-3p_R-1, stu-miR3627-3p, stu-miR827-5p, stu-miR827-3p, stu-miR172b-5p, stu-miR6022-p3_7, and stu-miR398a-5p accounted for the largest percentage differences, indicating that the differential expression of these miRNAs was the highest under DLA treatment. LN_YRS accounted for the largest proportion of differential expression of stu-miR482a-3p, indicating that stu-miR482a-3p was differentially expressed for LN_YRS under treatment; LN_YLA accounted for the largest proportion of differential expression of stu-miR8036-3p, indicating that the differential expression of stu-miR8036-3p was significant for LN_YLA under treatment; LN_DLS accounted for the largest share in the differential expression of stu-miR482a-5p, indicating that stu-miR482a-5p was differentially expressed in LN_DLS under treatment conditions. LN_YRS was the most represented in the differential expression of stu-miR166c-5p_L-3, indicating that the differential expression of stu-miR166c-5p_L-3 was significant in LN_YRS under treatment conditions.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Differential miRNA expression patterns under no N treatment HN: excess N application; LN: no N application; Y: Yanshu4; D: Atlantic; S: seedling stage; A: budding stage

As shown in Fig. 5, the expression of differential miRNAs under excessive N treatment conditions showed that HN_YLS had the largest share in the differential expression of stu-miR396-5p, stu-miR408b-3p_R-1, and stu-miR156a_L-1, indicating that the differential expression of stu-miR396-5p, stu-miR408b-3p_R-1, and stu-miR156a_L-1 was most significant under HN_YLS treatment conditions; the largest proportion of differential expression of stu-miR3627-3p, stu-miR482a-5p, stu-miR827-5p, stu-miR172b-5p, and stu-miR398a-5p was observed under HN_DLA treatment, indicating that the differential expression of these miRNAs was most significant under HN_DLA treatment conditions; HN_YRA accounted for the largest proportion of differential expression of stu-miR482a-3p and stu-miR827-3p, indicating that stu-miR482a-3p and stu-miR827-3p were differentially expressed under HN_YRA treatment conditions; HN_YLA accounted for the significant expression of stu-miR8036-3p, which exhibited the largest proportion of differential expression, indicating that stu-miR8036-3p was differentially expressed under HN_YLA treatment conditions; HN_DLS accounted for the largest proportion of differential expression of stu-miR6022-p3_7, indicating that stu-miR6022-p3_7 was differentially expressed under HN_DLS treatment conditions; HN_ DRA accounted for the highest level of differential expression of stu-miR166c-5p_L-3, indicating that the differential expression of stu-miR166c-5p_L-3 was significant under HN_DRA treatment conditions.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Differential miRNA expression patterns under excessive N treatment HN: excess N application; LN: no N application; Y: Yanshu4; D: Atlantic; S: seedling

Expression of differential miRNAs under different N treatments

As seen from the expression of differential miRNAs in the Atlantic variety in Fig. 6, LN_DRA accounted for the largest proportion of the differences in the expression of stu-miR396-5p, which indicated that the differential expression of stu-miR396-5p was the most significant in LN_DRA under treatment; HN_DLA accounted for the largest proportion of the differences in the expression of stu-miR408b-3p_R-1, stu-miR3627-3p, stu-miR482a-5p, stu-miR172b-5p, and stu-miR398a-5p, indicating that these differential miRNAs were most significantly expressed in HN_DLA under treatment; LN_DRS accounted for the largest percentage of differential expression of stu-miR482a-3p, indicating that stu-miR482a- 3p was most significantly expressed in LN_DRS under treatment; HN_DLS accounted for the largest proportion of differences in the expression of stu-miR8036-3p, indicating that stu-miR8036-3p was most significantly expressed in HN_DLS under treatment; LN_DLA had the largest proportion of differences in the expression of stu-miR827-5p, stu-miR827-3p, and stu-miR6022-p3_7, indicating that stu-miR827-5p, stu-miR827-3p, and stu-miR6022-p3_7 were most significantly differentially expressed in LN_DLA under treatment; LN_DLS accounted for most significant expression of stu-miR156a_L-1, indicating that the differential expression of stu-miR156a_L-1 was most significant in LN_DLS under treatment; HN_DRA accounted for the most significant differential expression of stu-miR166c-5p_L-3, indicating that the differential expression of stu-miR166c-5p_L-3 was most significant in HN_DRA under treatment.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Differential miRNA expression patterns in the Atlantic variety HN: excess N application; LN: no N application; Y: Yanshu4; D: Atlantic; S: seedling stage; A: budding stage

As shown in Fig. 7, in Yanshu4, LN_YLS accounted for the largest differences in expression in stu-miR396-5p, stu-miR482a-5p, stu-miR827-5p, and stu-miR156a_L-1, indicating that the differential expression of stu-miR396-5p, stu-miR482a-5p, stu-miR827-5p, and stu-miR156a_L-1 was most significant in LN_YLS under treatment; HN_YLS accounted for the largest proportion of differences in the expression of stu-miR408b-3p_R-1 and stu-miR398a-5p, indicating that the expression of stu-miR408b-3p_R-1 and stu-miR398a-5p was most significant in HN_YLS under treatment; HN_YLS accounted for the largest differences in expression of stu-miR408b-3p_R-1 and stu-miR398a-5p, indicating that stu-miR408b-3p_R-1 and stu-miR398a-5p were most significantly expressed in HN_YLS under treatment; LN_YLA accounted for the largest difference in expression of stu-miR3627-3p, indicating that stu-miR3627-3p was most significantly expressed in LN_YLA under treatment; HN_YRA accounted for the largest difference in expression of stu-miR482a-3p and stu-miR6022-p3_7, indicating that the differential expression of stu-miR482a-3p and stu-miR6022-p3_7 was most significant in HN_YRA under treatment; HN_YLA accounted for the largest proportion of differences in expression of stu-miR8036-3p and stu-miR172b-5p, indicating that the differential expression of stu-miR8036-3p and stu-miR172b-5p by HN_YLA was most significant under treatment; LN_YRA accounted for the largest proportion of differences in the expression of stu-miR827-3p, indicating that the differential expression of stu-miR827-3p was most significant in LN_YRA under treatment.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Differential miRNA expression patterns in the Yanshu4 variety HN: excess N application; LN: no N application; Y: Yanshu4; D: Atlantic; S: seedling stage; A: budding stage

Under both types of N stress in the Yanshu4 variety, stu-miR396-5p was down-regulated in the seedling-stage and budding-stage roots and up-regulated in the seedling-stage and budding-stage leaves. stu-miR408b-3p_R-1 and stu-miR482a-3p were up-regulated in the seedling-stage and budding-stage roots and leaves. stu-miR8036-3p was up-regulated in the seedling stage and roots and up-regulated in the budding-stage leaves and roots. The expression of stu-miR482a-5p was up-regulated in the seedling stage and roots. stu-miR156a_L-1 was down-regulated in the seedling stage and roots and the budding-stage roots. stu-miR172b-5p expression was up-regulated in the seedling-stage and budding-stage roots and down-regulated in the seedling stage. stu-miR6022-p3_7 expression was up-regulated in the seedling stage. stu-miR398a-5p expression was up-regulated in the seedling-stage and budding-stage leaves and down-regulated in the seedling-stage and budding-stage roots. The expression of stu-miR166c-5p_L-3 was down-regulated in the seedling stage and roots and up-regulated in leaves and roots in the budding-stage.

As seen from the expression of differential miRNAs in leaves of the two potatoes in Fig. 8, LN_YLS accounted for the largest proportion of differences in the expression of stu-miR396-5p, indicating that stu-miR396-5p was most significantly expressed by LN_YLS under treatment; HN_DLA accounted for the largest proportion of the differences in the expression of stu-miR408b-3p_R-1, stu-miR3627-3p, stu-miR482a-5p, stu-miR172b-5p, and stu-miR398a-5p, indicating that the differential expression of the above miRNAs were most significant in HN_DLA under treatment; HN_YLS accounted for the most significant differential expression of stu-miR482a-3p, indicating that stu-miR482a-3p was most significantly expressed by HN_YLS under treatment; LN_YLA accounted for the largest proportion of differences in the expression of stu-miR8036-3p, indicating that stu-miR8036-3p was most significantly expressed by LN_YLA under treatment; LN_DLA accounted for the most significant expression of stu-miR827-5p, stu-miR827-3p, stu-miR6022-p3_7, and stu-miR166c-5p_L-3 accounted for the largest expression differences, indicating that the above miRNAs were most significantly expressed differentially in LN_DLA under treatment.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Differential miRNA expression patterns in the leaves of two potato varieties HN: excess N application; LN: no N application; Y: Yanshu4; D: Atlantic; S: seedling stage; A: budding stage

As shown in Fig. 9, the expression of differential miRNAs in two potato roots showed that LN_DRA accounted for the largest proportion of the differences in the expression of stu-miR396-5p and stu-miR3627-3p, indicating that the differential expression of stu-miR396-5p and stu-miR3627-3p was the highest in LN_DRA under treatment. HN_DRA accounted for the largest percentage of differences in the expression of stu-miR408b-3p_R-1 and stu-miR156a_L-1, indicating that the differential expression of stu-miR408b-3p_R-1 and stu-miR156a_L-1 was most significant in HN_DRA under treatment; HN_YRA was expressed differentially in stu-miR482a-3p and stu-miR6022-p3_7, indicating that the differential expression of stu-miR482a-3p and stu-miR6022-p3_7 was most significantly in HN_YRA under treatment; LN_YRS accounted for the most significant differential expression of stu-miR8036-3p and stu-miR166c-5p_L-3, indicating that the differential expression of stu-miR8036-3p and stu-miR166c-5p_L-3 was most significant in LN_YRS under treatment; HN_DRS accounted for the largest percentage of differences in the expression of stu-miR482a-5p, stu-miR827-5p, and stu-miR398a-5p, indicating that the differential expression of the above miRNAs by HN_DRS was most significant under treatment; LN_DRS accounted for the largest percentage of differences in expression of stu-miR827-3p and stu-miR172b-5p, indicating that stu-miR827-3p and stu-miR172b-5p were most significantly expressed by LN_DRS under treatment; HN_YRA accounted for the most significant differences in the expression of stu-miR6022-p3_7, indicating that stu-miR6022-p3_7 was most significantly expressed differentially by HN_YRA under treatment.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Differential miRNA expression patterns in the roots of two potato varieties HN: excess N application; LN: no N application; Y: Yanshu4; D: Atlantic; S: seedling stage; A: budding stage

As seen from the expression of differential miRNAs in the two potato seedlings in Fig. 10, LN_YLS accounted for the largest difference in the expression of stu-miR396-5p, indicating that the differential expression of stu-miR396-5p was most significant in LN_YLS under treatment; HN_DLA accounted for the differential expression of stu-miR408b-3p_R-1, stu-miR8036-3p, stu-miR482a-5p, stu-miR172b-5p, stu-miR6022-p3_7, stu-miR398a-5p, and stu-miR166c-5p_L-3, indicating that the above miRNAs were most significantly expressed differentially in HN_DLA under treatment; LN_DLS accounted for the most significant expression of stu-miR3627-3p, stu-miR827-5p, and stu-miR827-3p, indicating that stu-miR3627-3p, stu-miR827-5p, and stu-miR827-3p were most differentially expressed in LN_DLS under treatment; HN_YRS accounted for the most significant difference in the expression of stu-miR482a-3p, indicating that the differential expression of stu-miR482a-3p was most significant in HN_YRS under treatment.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Differential miRNA expression patterns at the seedling stage in the two potato varieties HN: excess N application; LN: no N application; Y: Yanshu4; D: Atlantic; S: seedling stage; A: budding stage

As seen in Fig. 11, the expression of differential miRNAs in two potato varieties at the budding stage in HN_YRS accounted for the largest percentage difference in the expression of stu-miR396-5p, indicating that stu-miR396-5p was most significantly expressed in HN_YRS under treatment; HN_DLA accounted for the largest percentage difference in the expression of stu-miR408b-3p_R-1, stu-miR3627-3p, stu-miR482a-5p, and stu-miR172b-5p, indicating that the differential expression of these miRNAs was the most significant in HN_DLA under treatment; HN_YRA accounted for the most significant expression of stu-miR482a-3p, indicating that stu-miR482a-3p was most significantly expressed by HN_YRA under treatment; HN_YLA exhibited the largest proportion of differences in the expression of stu-miR8036-3p, indicating that stu-miR8036-3p was most significantly expressed in HN_YLA under treatment; LN_DLA exhibited the largest proportion of differences in the expression of stu-miR827-5p, stu-miR827-3p, stu-miR6022-p3_7, and stu-miR398a-5p, indicating that the above miRNAs were most differentially expressed in LN_DLA under treatment; LN_YLA accounted for the most differential expression of stu-miR156a_L-1, indicating that the differential expression of stu-miR156a_L-1 was the highest for LN_YLA under treatment; HN_DRA accounted for the largest proportion of differences in the expression of stu-miR166c-5p_L-3, indicating that the differential expression of stu-miR166c-5p_L-3 was the most significant in HN_DRA under treatment.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Differential miRNA expression patterns in the two potato varieties at the budding stage HN: excess N application; LN: no N application; Y: Yanshu4; D: Atlantic; S: seedling stage; A: budding stage

Analysis of traits, target genes, and differential miRNAs

Analysis of the relationship between traits and target genes

As shown in Fig. 12, the NiR activities in the Yanshu4 and Atlantic varieties showed a significant upward trend with an increase in the N levels applied from the seedling stage to the germination stage, with either excess N application or no N application. This indicated that the NiR activities in the two kinds of potatoes were positively correlated with both types of N stress, i.e., the NiR gene in the two kinds of potatoes was highly responsive to N stress.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Analysis of nitrite reductase (NiR) activity of N-efficient and N-inefficient potato plants under N stress. 1 and 3, the seedling stage; 2 and 4 the budding stage

The analysis of target genes and their corresponding differential miRNAs is shown in Fig. 13. In the Yanshu4 and Atlantic varieties, the relative expression of NiR from the seedling stage to the budding stage showed a significant upward trend from the absence of N application to excessive N application. stu-miR396-5p expression decreased significantly from the seedling stage to the budding stage from the absence of N application to excessive N application, especially in the Yanshu4 variety.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Relative expression analysis of the N-efficient Yanshu4 variety, N-inefficient, nitrite reductase-expressing Atlantic variety, and miR396-5p under N stress YN + : N over-application in the Yanshu4 variety; YN-: No N application in the Yanshu4 variety; DN + : N over-application in the Atlantic variety; DN-: No N application in the Atlantic variety; 2, 3, 5, and 7: the seedling stage; 1, 4, 6, and 8: the budding stage

The relative expression of NiR in the two kinds of potatoes showed a significant upward trend from excessive N application to the absence of N application. The relative expression of stu-miR396-5p in the two potato varieties showed a significant downward trend from excessive N application to the absence of N application. The expression of NiR in the two potato varieties was positively correlated with N application, while the relative expression of stu-miR396-5p was negatively correlated with N application.

The prediction of the binding site of stu-miR396-5p to StNiR was performed using the online URL and the predicted results are shown in Fig. 14. There may be a binding site between stu-miR396-5p and StNiR, and there may be a splicing relationship between the 8th base of stu-miR396-5p and the 8th base of StNiR from the 5' end of stu-miR396-5p.

Fig. 14
figure 14

Prediction of the binding of stu-miR396-5p with the StNiR binding site

As shown in Fig. 15, the binding ratio of NiR-luc to miR396-5p was 0.2715; the binding ratio of NiR-luc to 1300-35S-X was 1; the binding ratio of 1300-luc to NiR-luc was 0.9452; and the binding ratio of 1300-luc to NiR-luc was 0.9452. The binding ratio to 1300-35S-X was 0.9143; hence, it was confirmed that miR396-5p binds to the NiR sequence and causes product degradation. Therefore, it can be confirmed that stu-miR396-5p could bind in a targeted manner with StNiR.

Fig. 15
figure 15

Validation of the binding site of stu-miR396-5p to StNiR

Discussion

Analysis of miRNA expression under N stress

The continuous developments in sequencing technology have resulted in its increasingly extensive application in recent years. Studies involving the use of Illumina sequencing technology have shown that there are differences in the aluminum tolerance of miRNAs between Ailanthus sinensis and Ailanthus macrophylla roots. miR160 promotes adventitious and lateral root development; miR3627 results in an increase in citric acid secretion; miR3627 and miR482 control the alternative glycolytic pathway and TCA cycle in a flexible manner; miR172 regulates miRNA metabolism flexibly. miR160 was found to affect root development in citrus plants, and cas-miR5139 and csi-miR12105 played important roles in the tolerance to aluminum in citrus plants via the regulation of cell wall components [17]. The study by Fische on the regulation of miRNA expression in plants showed that miR396 expression was down-regulated under N-deficient conditions [18]. Trindade et al. have revealed that miR396 facilitated the generation of a response to water stress in alfalfa [19]. Our miRNA sequencing results showed that the expression levels of stu-miR396-5p, stu-miR8036-3p, and stu-miR482a-3p were significantly different in the over- and under-fertilized seedlings, roots, and leaves in the germination stage in the Yanshu4 and Atlantic varieties.

Expression analysis of differential miRNAs in two potato cultivars, root and leaf tissues, and two growth stages under two N stress conditions

Expression analysis of miR396

Numerous studies have shown that different miRNAs are involved in the generation of responses to different stress conditions and play extremely important roles in plant growth. miR396 is directly related to the metabolic regulation, growth, and development of plants [20], and is expressed upon exposure to water stress, temperature stress, salt stress, and during processes such as oxidative processes, fatty acid metabolism, root tip growth and development [21], and bacterial infections [22]. In addition, miR396-GRF plays an important regulatory role in the response to different types of N stress, and the expression of LsaGRFs in lettuce with LSA-miR396 can regulate leaf growth via the cleavage of complementary sequences [23]. We found that the differentially expressed stu-miR396-5p was highly responsive to N stress, with stu-miR396-5p being down-regulated in the Atlantic variety in both the seedling stage and roots, and in the budding-stage leaves and roots, and stu-miR396-5p being down-regulated in the seedling-stage and budding-stage roots, and up-regulated in the seedling-stage and budding-stage leaves in the Yanshu4 variety. A study by Fischer [24] on the regulation of miRNA expression in plants found that the expression of miR396 was also down-regulated under N deficient conditions [25].

Expression analysis of miR156

Studies have shown that miR156 expression is upregulated in plants under N deficient conditions. miR156 has also been found to play an important role in many metabolic pathways in the potato plant, and it has been shown that miR156 inhibits potato tuber formation [26]. miR156e regulates potato tuber development by regulating its target gene StPTB6 [27]. It has been shown that the expression level of potato miR156 is also regulated during the photoperiod [28]. miR156/157 targets SPL transcription factors, thereby regulating the polarity of flowering organs in the potato plant [29]. In this study, we found that stu-miR156a_L-1 was down-regulated in the seedling stage and roots, and in roots in the budding stage under two types of N stress in the Yanshu4 variety. In the Atlantic variety, stu-miR156a_L-1 was down-regulated in the seedling stage and roots, and up-regulated in the seedling stage and leaves at the budding stage under both types of N stress, and the expression of both potatoes was significantly higher in leaves treated with excess N than in leaves not treated with N. It is assumed that stu-miR156_L-1 was up-regulated under N stress. The corresponding target gene was NRT2.5, a key enzyme involved in the N metabolism pathway, and a previous study on the NRT family revealed that family members play an active role in the N metabolism pathway when the N level is sufficient, while N deficiency induces stress in potato [30]. Thus, we further speculate that stu-miR156a_L-1 may have a regulatory relationship with its target gene NRT2.5, which facilitates the regulation of the N metabolic pathway in potato; however, the exact regulatory mechanism needs to be explored further.

Expression analysis of miR482

Notably, pathogenic infections were effectively suppressed in potato [31], tomato [32], and cotton [33] plants through the inhibition of miR482. We found that the expression of stu-miR482a-5p and stu-miR482a-3p was up-regulated with an increase in N application under both types of N stress, which could indicate that miR482a-5p is sensitive to different N treatments. stu-miR482a-3p was up-regulated in the seedling stage and roots and leaves in the budding stage under both types of N stress. The expression of stu-miR482a-3p was up-regulated in the seedling stage and roots and leaves at the budding stage under both types of N stress. In the Atlantic variety, stu-miR482a-3p was down-regulated in the seedling stage and roots and up-regulated in leaves and roots in the budding stage under both types of N stress. stu-miR482a-5p was up-regulated in the seedling stage and roots of the Yanshu4 variety and up-regulated in both the seedling stage and roots and leaves in the budding stage in the Atlantic variety. We tentatively identified the role of miR482a against a novel abiotic stress, but its specific functions need to be investigated further.

Expression analysis of miR172

miR172 is reportedly involved in flower and tuber induction signaling pathways in potato plants and helps visualize the clear link between solute transport and flowering and tuber induction [34]. It has also been shown that tomato miR172 targets the APETALA2 transcription factor SlAP2a to regulate fruit ripening [35]. Ferdous found that under conditions of water stress in barley plants, miR172, miR396a, and miR396c regulated P5CS expression, which in turn regulates proline accumulation and provides molecular evidence regarding the process of drought tolerance in potato plants [36]. It was also found that miR172 was significantly expressed in the potato tuber developmental stages [37]. In this study, stu-miR172b-5p was found to be expressed at higher levels in the budding-stage roots of the Atlantic variety than in leaves subjected to excessive N treatment. stu-miR172b-5p was up-regulated in the seedling-stage and budding-stage leaves and roots of the Atlantic variety and down-regulated in the seedling stage. In Yanshu4, stu-miR172b-5p was up-regulated in the seedling-stage and budding-stage roots, and down-regulated in the seedling stage; thus, it is highly responsive to N stress. Our findings are similar to the findings obtained in previous studies, but the functions of these miRNAs need to be investigated further.

Expression analysis of miR827

It has been suggested that miR827 plays a key role in adaptation to drought tolerance in barley, and miR827 strongly induces Pi starvation through the aboveground area and roots [38]. We also found a more significant difference between stu-miR827-3p and stu-miR827-5p in both types of potato plants subjected to different N treatments. In Yanshu4, stu-miR827-5p was down-regulated in the seedling stage. stu-miR827-3p was down-regulated in the seedling stage, roots, and budding-stage roots, and was up-regulated in the seedling stage. In the Atlantic variety, stu-miR827-5p was up-regulated in the seedling- and budding-stage roots and down-regulated in the seedling- and budding-stage leaves. stu-miR827-3p was down-regulated in the seedling- and budding-stage leaves and up-regulated in the seedling- and budding-stage roots. However, we intended to screen for N metabolism-related genes whose target genes do not include key enzymes in the metabolic pathway for N, as this would provide new directions for research.

Expression analysis of miR408

miR408 is involved in the regulation of plant growth and development, and responses to stress. miR408 can affect photosynthesis and ultimately promote grain yield by down-regulating target proteins that regulate plastocyanin; this reveals the function of miR408 and its targets in the regulation of plant growth and development and responses of plants to various abiotic and biotic stresses [39]. Previous studies have shown that overexpression of miR408 significantly enhances drought tolerance in chickpea [40], while new studies have shown that the loss of function of miR408 can negatively regulate germination in light-dependent seeds [41]. We found that stu-miR408b-3p_R-1 was up-regulated in the seedling-stage and budding-stage roots and leaves of the Yanshu4 variety subjected to both types of N stress. In the Atlantic variety, stu-miR408b-3p_R-1 was up-regulated in both the seedling stage and roots and the budding-stage leaves and roots because of the high responsiveness to N stress. We verified the expression of miR408 from a new abiotic stress perspective, which opens a new avenue for further understanding this ancient and highly conserved miRNA.

Expression analysis of miR8036

There are hardly any reports on miR8036. We found that stu-miR8036-3p was up-regulated in the Atlantic variety subjected to both types of N stress in both the seedling stage and roots and in the budding-stage leaves and roots; while in the Yanshu4 variety, stu-miR8036-3p was up-regulated in the seedling stage and roots and down-regulated in the budding-stage leaves and roots. The specific regulatory mechanism of action is not clear and needs to be explored thoroughly in future studies.

Expression analysis of miR398

miRNA398 is considered to have a direct association with the plant stress regulatory network, as it regulates plant responses to oxidative stress, water deficit, salt stress, abscisic acid stress, UV stress, copper and phosphorus deficiencies, high glucose levels, and bacterial infections [12]. It is of great importance in studies focusing on the responses to both biotic and abiotic stresses. It has been suggested that miR398 enhances superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in wheat roots by regulating the expression of WRKY, thus achieving the alleviation of non-induced oxidative toxicity in wheat roots [42]. Recent studies have shown that miR398 can alleviate the symptoms of bamboo mosaic virus infections and mitigate viral accumulation via the regulation of antioxidants [43]. In the present study, we found that stu-miR398a-5p was up-regulated when the Atlantic variety was subjected to both types of N stress in the seedling stage and roots and the budding-stage leaves and roots. stu-miR398a-5p was up-regulated in the seedling- and budding-stage leaves and down-regulated in the seedling- and budding-stage roots in the Yanshu4 variety. We investigated the relationship between miRNA398 and N stress and have contributed to research on miRNA398.

Expression analysis of miR6022

Studies reporting on significant changes in the relative levels of abundance of Streptococcus species such as the Streptococcus habrochetes subtype in tomato plants under low-temperature stress could indicate the important role played by miR6022 in response to cold stress [44]. It has also been shown that sly-miR6022 regulates the tomato R gene Cf-9 at the post-transcriptional level [45]. In the potato plant, miR6022 was found to be involved in the regulation of other miRNAs via the intertwining of different regulatory networks, which revealed how developmental signals, disease symptom development, and stress signals are regulated by each other, and the balance in their levels is, therefore, maintained  [46]. In the present study, we found that stu-miR6022-p3_7 was up-regulated in the seedling stage under two types of N stress in the Yanshu4 variety. In the Atlantic variety, stu-miR6022-p3_7 was up-regulated in the seedling stage and roots at the budding stage. This study provides a new research idea based on previous work in this field, as specific regulatory mechanisms need to be investigated further.

Expression analysis of miR166

Recent studies found that the sly-miR166 and SlyHB modules are factors that increase susceptibility for ToLCNDV (New Delhi tomato varroa virus) in the tomato plant. sly-miR166/SlyHB is negatively regulated; hence, the regulation of sly-miR166 expression can be achieved by regulating SlyHB, which in turn regulates the pathogenesis of ToLCNDV [47]. It was found that tomato plants carrying Slhb15a with miRNA166 resistance alleles exhibited normal ovule development, and the use of Slhb15a and reciprocal regulation of miRNA166 could promote fruit setting at extreme temperatures [48]. We found that when the Yanshu4 variety was subjected to two types of N stress, stu-miR166c-5p_L-3 was down-regulated in the seedling stage and roots and up-regulated in the budding-stage leaves and roots; and in the Atlantic variety, stu-miR166c-5p_L-3 was up-regulated in the budding-stage roots and down-regulated in the budding-stage leaves. The specific regulatory mechanisms attributable for these activities need to be investigated further, to understand the role of these miRNAs against biotic and abiotic stresses in plants more thoroughly.

Differences in the expression of miRNAs, target genes, and traits under N stress

This study showed that the relative expression of StNiR showed a significant upward trend with an increase in N application, while the relative expression of stu-miR396-5p showed a significant downward trend with increased N application; this was more notable in the Yanshu4 variety. Degradome analysis revealed that the corresponding target gene of stu-miR396-5p was NiR, and in combination with the findings of a previous study, NiR activity was found to show a significant upward trend from no N application to excessive N application in the Yanshu4 and Atlantic varieties; this indicates a high level of responsiveness to N stress, which is consistent with the findings of Jiao [49]. This study also reported that stu-miR396-5p showed a trend of down-regulation from no N application to excessive N application in the Yanshu4 and Atlantic varieties. Therefore, it was suggested that there was a negative correlation between stu-miR396-5p and StNiR when potato plants were subjected to N stress. Thus, it was hypothesized that these miRNAs might play an important role in the N metabolic pathway of potato plants.

Yi found that the target gene of sit-miR396, Type-IV, was functionally enriched mainly when it performed a catalytic role, such as that observed for hydrolase, isomerase, and peroxidase, and a functional study of sit-miR396 showed that it could effectively regulate the growth of plants [50]. In addition, the rapid validation of rice miRNA target genes via the transient expression of rice protoplasts could enhance the activity of the target gene OsNF-YA4; the expression of miR169o was significantly up-regulated, which clarified the regulatory role of OsNF-YA4 and miR169o in the expression of rice protoplasts [51]. It has also been reported that in tomato plants, the S1COL4 transcription factor plays a negative regulatory role in fruit ripening by regulating ASC gene expression, which in turn regulates the ethylene biosynthesis pathway [52]. Therefore, we designed our experimental protocol according to the Fig. 16 shown below, in order to fully explore the specific regulatory role played by StNiR and stu-miR396-5p in the N metabolism pathway of potato plants.

Fig. 16
figure 16

miRNA and target gene regulatory strate

In summary, our study confirmed the key role of 13 miRNAs in adaptation to two N stresses in potato. The selected stu-miR396-5p and its potential target gene StNiR are involved in the nitrogen metabolism pathway of potato, and further studies are needed to confirm the specific loci of action of miRNAs and their targets to explore their functions in nitrogen uptake and utilization, so as to breed nitrogen-efficient potato varieties that respond to nitrogen stress without affecting yield.

Conclusion

miRNA sequencing facilitated the prediction of 48 families and 1439 miRNAs, of which 798 miRNAs have been reported previously and 349 are novel miRNAs. Thirteen miRNAs that were closely related to the N metabolic pathway were screened in this study, and degradome analysis showed that most of these miRNAs showed a many-to-many relationship with target genes. The results of GO and KEGG enrichment analyses revealed that numerous biological processes and metabolic pathways were involved in N metabolism, carbon metabolism, and phytohormone biosynthesis. We screened the miRNAs associated with N metabolism pathways and related pathways. The validation of the screened differential miRNAs by qRT-PCR showed that stu-miR396-5p, stu-miR408b-3p_R-1, stu-miR3627-3p, stu-miR482a-3p, stu-miR8036-3p, stu-miR482a-5p, stu-miR827-5p, stu-miR156a_L-1, stu-miR827-3p, stu-miR172b-5p, stu-miR6022-p3_7, stu-miR398a-5p, and stu-miR166c-5p_L-3 were all found in the Yanshu4 and Atlantic varieties, at the seedling and budding stages, and differential expression was observed in the root and leaf in response to N stress. The most significant differences in miRNAs were observed for stu-miR396-5p, stu-miR8036-3p, and stu-miR482a-3p. These miRNAs, especially stu-miR396-5p, were down-regulated in the seedling stage and roots, and in the budding-stage leaves and roots of the Atlantic variety under both types of N stress; stu-miR482a-3p was down-regulated in the seedling stage and roots and up-regulated in the budding-stage leaves and roots; stu-miR482a-3p was up-regulated in the seedling stage and roots, and the budding-stage leaves. The expression of stu-miR482a-3p was down-regulated in the seedling stage and roots, and up-regulated in leaves and roots at the budding stage; stu-miR8036-3p was up-regulated in the seedling stage and roots, and leaves and roots at the budding stage. Previously, it was found that the activities of NiR in the leaves and roots of the Yanshu4 and Atlantic varieties were positively correlated at the seedling and budding stages in varieties that were not treated or excessively treated with N, and both were highly responsive to N stress. qRT-PCR results revealed that NiR was positively correlated with the expression levels in the seedlings, buds, roots, and leaves of both the Yanyan4 and Atlantic varieties, and stu-miR396-5p was negatively correlated with the expression levels in the seedlings, buds, roots, and leaves of both the Yanyan4 and Atlantic varieties that were either not treated or excessively treated with N, and the difference in the expression level was highly significant. The splicing relationship between StNiR and stu-miR396-5p was identified using online prediction software, and this relationship was verified using the luciferase assay.

Materials and methods

Plant material and treatments

The tetraploid N-efficient potato variety Yanshu4 (Solanum tuberosum L. var. Yanshu4) (Y) and N-inefficient Atlantic (S. tuberosum L. var. Atlantic) (D) variety, used as test materials, were provided by the Potato Innovation Team at Jilin Agricultural University. The pot test was performed, and culture growth was assessed under open field conditions. Seed potatoes were cut, treated for potting, and subjected to two types of N stress after potting, i.e., a complete lack of application of N fertilizer at N: 0 kg/667 m2 and over-application of N fertilizer at N: 25 kg/667 m2; the main source of N fertilizer was urea (containing 46% N). Calcium superphosphate (containing P2O5 46%) was applied uniformly at a rate of 18 kg/667 m2, and potassium sulfate (containing K2O 50%) was applied at a rate of 36 kg/667 m2. All fertilizers were applied once as base fertilizer, and 10 pots were planted during each the treatment process; three biological replicates were set up. Roots and leaves were collected at the seedling stage (15 days after seedling emergence, S) and budding stage (30 days after seedling emergence, A), snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, stored at -80℃, and sent to Biotechnology Ltd. for miRNA sequencing, degradome analysis, and qRT-PCR validation.

Construction of miRNA and degradation libraries

The miRNA library was constructed in accordance with the standard procedure provided by Illumina for library preparation and sequencing-related experiments. miRNAs from the sequencing library TruSeq were prepared using Small RNA Sample Prep Kits (Illumina, San Diego, USA).

End-repair technology was used to construct the degradation group library and perform 5'-adaptor ligation, 3'-adaptor ligation, reverse transcription, short PCR amplification, enzyme digestion, 3' double chain DNA joint ligation, and long PCR amplification [53]. Library construction was carried out on the basis of Axtel1 [54] degradome library construction, which was further optimized and simplified by the introduction of the bead screening process. After library preparation, the constructed libraries were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq2000/2500 (Illumina, San Diego, USA)instrument at a single-end read length of 1 × 50 bp. See Additional file 1, Table 5 for all database URLs used.

Analysis of miRNAs and prediction of target genes

Through a series of data processing steps, the original data obtained during sequencing can be used to generate comparable pairs of sequences for subsequent analysis. The re-alignment of sequences with sequences of species obtained via cDNA database sequence alignment generated a degradation group density file (degradome density file). Then, using shear site prediction software (GSTAr), we predicted and sequenced species miRNA sequence pairs of target gene sequences. Finally, the predicted miRNAs and their corresponding target genes were combined with the target genes in the generated degradome data, to identify common target genes.

The degradation group was analyzed using the Cleave Land Program [55]. The application OliGO map for the short reading frame calibrator enabled us to identify the target genes matching the degradation group sequence [56]. The OliGO map was again applied to extract 13 sequences upstream and 13 sequences downstream of the paired site for each accurately paired degradome sequence, to form a 26-nt target gene, and the Needle program from the EMBOSS package was applied to derive all the sequences that matched the sequences in the provided miRNA library. Then, columns were scored against the plant miRNAs/target pairing criteria. The score should not exceed a user-set threshold and should retain 10 nt at the 5' end of the degradome sequence paired with the miRNA.

miRNA identification and prediction of expression profiles

The expression profile information of miRNAs was identified using a normalization method. First, a regular sequence was identified in all samples, a reference data family was constructed, and a logarithmic transformation with base 2 was performed using the copy number for all samples and the reference data family (log2(copy#)). Then, the differences in the Δlog2(copy#) between the respective samples and the reference data family were determined, |Δlog2(copy#)| was set at < 2 sequences, and finally, the correction factor algorithm fi = 2Δyi was applied for sample i; the number of copies in each sample was corrected by multiplying the original number of copies by the algorithm correction factor fi.

Identification and functional annotation of target genes

Predicted target genes were mapped to the potato genome GDDH13 Version 1.1 (https://iris.angers.inra.fr/GDDH13/the-apple-genome-downloads.html) using HISAT2 (Johns Hopkins University Center for Computational Biology, Baltimore, MD, USA). Differently expressed genes with |log2(fold change)|≥ 1 and statistically significant values (P < 0.05) were selected using the R package Ballgown.

Enrichment analysis requires functional annotation to be performed using the GO database (http://www.geneontology.org/) and the KEGG pathway database [57] (http://www.genome.jp/KEGG/) [58]. First, the number of genes was counted per function or pathway for all target gene annotations corresponding to the selected miRNAs. Subsequently, a hypergeometric test was applied to determine the number of genes corresponding to the GO or KEGG pathway [59] in the annotation library (for all functionally annotated genes or all functionally annotated genes with a p-value ≤ 0.05, the threshold value was calculated (the default threshold is Score ≤ 2.5), and functions satisfying this condition were defined as those that were significantly enriched in miRNA-mRNA pairs. Functional enrichment analysis was used to identify the main biological functions of miRNA-mRNA relationships.

Quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis

Upstream primers for miRNAs were designed using miRNA Design V1.01 software (see Table 6 in Additional file 1 for details) with the universal reverse transcription primer: 3'- CAGCATAGGTCACGTCCCAGGCTCCAT AAGCGTGACCTATGCTGTTCAAG—5' and the universal downstream primer: 5'- AGT GCAGGGTCCGAGGTATT—3'. The cDNA synthesis of the first strand of stem-loop miRNAs was performed using the MR101 kit (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd). The reaction system included 2 µl of 5 × gDNA Wiper Mix and RNase-free ddH2O up to a volume of 10 µl; mixing was performed using a pipette. The reaction was allowed to occur at 42 °C for 2 min to remove genomic DNA. Subsequently, 1 µl of Stem-loop Primer (2 µM), 2 µl of 10 × RT Mix, and 2 µl of HiScriptII Enzyme Mix were added, and finally, RNase-free ddH2O was added to make up the volume to 20 µl. After mixing, the reaction conditions were as follows: 25 °C for 5 min, 50 °C for 15 min, and 85 °C for 5 min. The synthesis of the first-strand cDNA was completed. The internal reference gene was the potato elf1-α gene (Gene ID: 118,059,944) with the forward primer sequence: 5'- CAAGGATGACCCAGCCAAG -3' and the reverse primer sequence: 5'- TTCCTTACCTGAACGCCTGT -3' [60], and qRT-PCR was performed using an MQ101-01 kit obtained from VAZYME (Nanjing). The expression levels of miRNAs were detected by stem-loop RT-PCR using miRNA- specific stem-loop primers. The following mix was prepared in a qPCR tube: 10.0 µl of 2 × miRNAs from Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix, 0.4 µl of each Specific Primer (10 µM), 0.4 µl of mQ Primer R (10 µM), 1 µl of template DNA/cDNA, and RNase-free ddH2O to make up the volume to 20.0 µl. The qRT-PCR reaction was performed in three biological replicates under the following reaction conditions: 5 min at 95 °C, 40 cycles of 10 s at 95 °C and 30 s at 60 °C. Melting curve analysis was performed to determine product specificity. Finally, the fold change in miRNA expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method.

The miRNA data were uploaded to the GEO database (GEO: GSE199457).

Luciferase binding site detection

We used histoculture seedlings of the N-efficient Yanshu4 variety and the N-inefficient Atlantic potato variety, extracted total RNA, obtained the first clone of the StNiR sequence via PCR amplification (see Table 7 in Additional file 1, Additional file 3, and Additional file 4 for details), and predicted the site at which binding to stu-miR396-5p occurred via the Miranda online website.

The pCAMBIA1300-LUC-NiR and pCAMBIA1300-35S-396-5p expression vectors were constructed (see Additional file 3 for details) and transformed into Agrobacterium strains. Then, 2–4-week-old tobacco plants were selected for luciferase assay using the Dual-Luciferase Assay System (Promega Inc.). The luciferase activity was analyzed on a Promega luminescence detector. A total of four test groups were set up, namely test group 1: NiR-luc bound to miR396-5p, test group 2: NiR-luc bound to 1300-35S-X, test group 3:1300-luc bound to NiR-luc, and test group 4: 1300-luc bound to 1300-35S-X, where 1300-35S-X was the control for miR396-5p, and 1300-luc was the control for NiR-luc. Finally, the fluorescence value measured by the dual reporter system was used to calculate the fluorescence value of the target plasmid/control plasmid (i.e., the F/R value), and the ratio relative to the control was calculated. Significance analysis was performed and bar graphs were generated.

Availability of data and materials

The data content has been submitted to GEO database on 2022.3.25, and will be publicly released on 2024.2.28. The following links allow you to view the uploaded data:

To review GEO accession GSE199457:

Go to https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE199457.

Enter token unedcscqzpahxet into the box.

References

  1. Zhang J, et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals Nitrogen deficiency induced alterations in leaf and root of three cultivars of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0240662.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bingqiang, Z. and M. Xurong, Discussion on some major problems of soil and fertilizer in our country. Science and Technology Herald, 2007: p. 65–70.

  3. Han M, et al. The genetics of nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants. Annu Rev Genet. 2015;49:269–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Xing H, et al. Excessive nitrogen application under moderate soil water deficit decreases photosynthesis, respiration, carbon gain and water use efficiency of maize. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2021;166:1065–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tiwari JK, et al. Genome-wide identification and characterization of microRNAs by small RNA sequencing for low nitrogen stress in potato. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(5): e0233076.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Yun, Z., Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Potato to Nitrogen and Transcriptome Sequencing Analysis. Jilin Agricultural University, 2020.

  7. Zhang, Y., Physiological and biochemical response of potato to nitrogen and transcriptome sequencing analysis. Jilin Agricultural University, 2020.

  8. Fabian MR, Sonenberg N, Filipowicz W. Regulation of mRNA translation and stability by microRNAs. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:351–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. DP, B., miRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell, 2004.

  10. Sinha SK, et al. Nitrate starvation induced changes in root system architecture, carbon: nitrogen metabolism, and mirna expression in nitrogen-responsive wheat genotypes. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2015;177(6):1299–312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grabowska A, et al. Barley microRNAs as metabolic sensors for soil nitrogen availability. Plant Sci. 2020;299:110608.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu C, Ding Y, Liu H. MiR398 and plant stress responses. Physiol Plant. 2011;143(1):1–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Meng Y, et al. The regulatory activities of plant miRNAs: a more dynamic perspective. Plant Physiol. 2011;157(4):1583–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar R. Role of microRNAs in biotic and abiotic stress responses in crop plants. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2014;174(1):93–115.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jiangwei, Y., Identification and functional study of potato drought-related miRNAs. Gansu Agricultural University, 2015.

  16. Wu, H.J., et al., PsRobot: a web-based plant small RNA meta-analysis toolbox. Nucleic Acids Res, 2012. 40(Web Server issue): p. W22–8.

  17. Zhou YF, et al. Illumina sequencing revealed roles of microRNAs in different aluminum tolerance of two citrus species. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2020;26(11):2173–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang L, et al. Overexpression of potato miR482e enhanced plant sensitivity to Verticillium dahliae infection. J Integr Plant Biology. 2015;57(12):1078–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Trindade I, et al. miR398 and miR408 are up-regulated in response to water deficit in Medicago truncatula. Planta. 2010;231(3):705–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yanan, Z., Screening of apple anthracnose resistant miRNAs. China Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021.

  21. Dongxu, K., Characterization of miRNAs in poplar root tips based on nitrate nitrogen or ammonium nitrogen. Forestry Science Research, 2021.

  22. Lingyan, W., Molecular mechanism of brassinolide regulating the greening of yellowed seedlings of Arabidopsis thaliana. Shan Dong University, 2020.

  23. Zhang B, et al. Identification of growth-regulating factor transcription factors in lettuce (Lactuca sativa) genome and functional analysis of LsaGRF5 in leaf size regulation. BMC Plant Biol. 2021;21(1):485.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Fischer JJ, et al. Manipulation of microRNA expression to improve nitrogen use efficiency. Plant Sci. 2013;210:70–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang L, et al. Overexpression of potato miR482e enhanced plant sensitivity to Verticillium dahliae infection. J Integr Plant Biol. 2015;57(12):1078–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim YJ, et al. The role of mediator in small and long noncoding RNA production in Arabidopsis thaliana. EMBO J. 2011;30(5):814–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Kondhare KR, et al. Genome-wide transcriptome analysis reveals small RNA profiles involved in early stages of stolon-to-tuber transitions in potato under photoperiodic conditions. BMC Plant Biol. 2018;18(1):284.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Jie, C., Cloning and identification of miRNAs related to wheat ear development and hydrogen peroxide stress. China Agricultural University, 2019.

  29. Wenwei, Z., Identification and analysis of potato miRNAs. Nanchang University, 2007.

  30. Zhang J, et al. Genome-wide identification, structural and gene expression analysis of the nitrate transporters (NRTs) family in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). PLoS One. 2021;16(10):e0257383.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. De Vries S, et al., Expression profiling across wild and cultivated tomatoes supports the relevance of early miR482/2118 suppression for Phytophthora resistance. Proc Biol Sci, 2018.

  32. Wu F, et al. Molecular mechanism of modulating miR482b level in tomato with botrytis cinerea infection. BMC Plant Biol. 2021;21(1):496.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Garg V, Hackel A, Kuhn C. Expression Level of Mature miR172 in Wild Type and StSUT4-Silenced Plants of Solanum tuberosum Is Sucrose-Dependent. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(3):1455.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Yang J, et al. Prediction and verification of microRNAs related to proline accumulation under drought stress in potato. Comput Biol Chem. 2013;46:48–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chung MY, et al. Ectopic expression of miRNA172 in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) reveals novel function in fruit development through regulation of an AP2 transcription factor. BMC Plant Biol. 2020;20(1):283.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ferdous J, et al. Drought-inducible expression of Hv-miR827 enhances drought tolerance in transgenic barley. Funct Integr Genomics. 2017;17(2–3):279–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lakhotia N, et al., Identification and characterization of miRNAome in root, stem, leaf and tuber developmental stages of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) by high-throughput sequencing. . BMC Plant Biol., 2014.

  38. Lin SI, et al. Complex regulation of two target genes encoding SPX-MFS proteins by rice miR827 in response to phosphate starvation. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010;51(12):2119–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gao Y, et al. The evolution and functional roles of miR408 and its targets in plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(1):530.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Hajyzadeh M, et al. miR408 overexpression causes increased drought tolerance in chickpea. Gene. 2015;555(2):186–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Jiang A, et al. The PIF1-miR408-PLANTACYANIN repression cascade regulates light-dependent seed germination. Plant Cell. 2021;33(5):1506–29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Li J, et al. miR398 is involved in the relief of phenanthrene-induced oxidative toxicity in wheat roots. Environ Pollut. 2020;258: 113701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lin KY, et al. MiR398-regulated antioxidants contribute to Bamboo mosaic virus accumulation and symptom manifestation. Plant Physiol. 2022;188(1):593–607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Chen H, et al. A comparison of the low temperature transcriptomes of two tomato genotypes that differ in freezing tolerance: Solanum lycopersicum and Solanum habrochaites. BMC Plant Biol. 2015;15:132.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Li W, Xu YP, Cai XZ. Transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of the tomato leaf mould disease resistance gene Cf-9. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;470(1):163–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Križnik M, et al. Salicylic acid perturbs sRNA-Gibberellin regulatory network in immune response of potato to potato virus Y infection. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:2192.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Prasad A, et al. The sly-miR166-SlyHB module acts as a susceptibility factor during ToLCNDV infection. Theor Appl Genet. 2022;135(1):233–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Clepet C, et al. The miR166-SlHB15A regulatory module controls ovule development and parthenocarpic fruit set under adverse temperatures in tomato. Mol Plant. 2021;14(7):1185–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Jiao Jiao Jiao and W.Q. Rong., Differences in response to nitrogen in different genotypes of potato. North China Agricultural Journal, 2018.

  50. YiFei, Identification and functional analysis of millet microRNAs and their target genes. China Agricultural University, 2016.

  51. Hu Jixiang and C. Yaqian., Establishment of a rapid verification system for rice miRNA target genes based on transient expression system. biotechnology bulletin, 2019.

  52. Qiong, W., Effect and mechanism of ABA-ethylene interaction in regulating cherry tomato fruit ripening. Zhejiang University, 2019.

  53. Garzon R, Calin GA, Croce CM. MicroRNAs in Cancer. Annu Rev Med. 2009;60:167–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Axtell MJ. Classification and comparison of small RNAs from plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2013;64:137–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Song X, et al. MicroRNAs and their regulatory roles in plant-environment interactions. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2019;70:489–525.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Sun W, et al. microRNA: a master regulator of cellular processes for bioengineering systems. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2010;12:1–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):27–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Kanehisa M. Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms. Protein Sci. 2019;28(11):1947–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Kanehisa M, et al. KEGG: integrating viruses and cellular organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D545–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Wang H, et al. The cell death triggered by the nuclear localized RxLR effector PITG_22798 from phytophthora infestans is suppressed by the effector AVR3b. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(2):409.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Jilin Provincial Research Institute of Vegetables and Flowers for providing the species used in this study. The authors would like to thank TopEdit (www.topeditsci.com) for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by Jilin Provincial Department of science and technology. The funded project is Jilin potato genetic breeding and improved seed breeding innovation team (20200301025RQ).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The original idea was conceived by Yuzhu Han. Jingying Zhang designed the experimental protocol. Yue Lu obtained plant samples and extracted RNA samples for small RNA sequencing. Zhijun Han compiled the data. Zhongcai Han planted experimental materials and assisted in obtaining samples, while Shuang Li, Jiayue Zhang and Haoran Ma carried out the experimental work. Yue Lu, Jingying Zhang wrote the manuscript. All authors read, edited, and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuzhu Han.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Yanshu4 (Y) and Atlantic (D) are cultivars grown by Jilin Provincial Vegetable and Flower Research Institute. Experimental research and field studies comply with Jilin Agricultural University guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table 1.

Summarystatistics of the miRNA sequencing data of two potato varieties at the seedlingand budding stages supplied with different levels of  N. Table 2. Prediction of highly expressed miRNAs. Table 3. Prediction of target genes for differentialmiRNAs. Table 4. Enrichment analysis of target genescorresponding to differential miRNAs. Table 5. URLs of the online platforms. Table 6. Details of qRT-PCR primers for miRNAs. Table 7. Primer sequences. 

Additional file 2: Figure 1.

Analysis of variability among groups of differential miRNAsHN: excessive N application; LN: no N application; Y: Yanshu4; D: Atlantic;S: seedling stage; A: budding stage (A) LN_YLSvsLN_DLS (B) LN_YLAvsLN_DLA (C) HN_YLSvsHN_DLS. (D)HN_YLAvsHN_DLA (E) HN_DLSvsLN_DLS (F) HN_DLAvsLN_DLA. (G) HN_YLSvsLN_YLS (H)HN_YLAvsLN_YLA (I) LN_DLAvsLN_DLS. (J)HN_DLAvsHN_DLS (K)LN_YLAvsLN_YLS (L)HN_YLAvsHN_YLS.(M)LN_YRSvsLN_DRS (N)LN_YRAvsLN_DRA (O)HN_YRSvsHN_DRS. (P)HN_YRAvsHN_DRA (Q)HN_DRSvsLN_DRS(R)HN_DRAvsLN_DRA. (S)HN_YRSvsLN_YRS (T)HN_YRAvsLN_YRA (U)LN_DRAvsLN_DRS. (V)HN_DRAvsHN_DRS(W)LN_YRAvsLN_YRS (X)HN_YRAvsHN_YRS. Using the values of log2(fold change) as the horizontalcoordinate and -log10(p-value) as the vertical coordinate, volcanoplots were constructed for all miRNAs during differential expression analysis.The horizontal coordinate represents the fold change in the differentialexpression of miRNAs in different samples, and the vertical coordinaterepresents the statistical significance of the difference in the change inexpression levels of miRNAs. The red color represents up-regulatedsignificantly differentially expressed genes, the blue color representsdown-regulated significantly differentially expressed genes, and the grey dots representnon-significant differentially expressed genes. Figure 2. Comparison between groups of differential miRNAs. HN: excess N; LN:no N; Y: Yanshu4; D: Atlantic; S: seedling stage; A: budding stage. Thehorizontal coordinates indicate the data obtained after the comparison ofgroups, and the vertical coordinates indicate the number of up- anddown-regulated miRNAs. The red color represents up-regulated miRNAs, the bluecolor represents down-regulated miRNAs, and the numbers represent the number ofup- and down-regulated miRNAs. Figure 3. Results of clustering analysis ofdifferential miRNAs. HN: excess N; LN: no N; Y: Yanshu4; D: Atlantic; S: seedling;A: bud onset. (A)LN_YLSvsLN_DLS (B)LN_YLAvsLN_DLA (C)HN_YLSvsHN_DLS. (D)HN_YLAvsHN_DL.(E)HN_DLSvsLN_DLS (F)HN_DLAvsLN_DLA. (G)HN_YLSvsLN_YLS(H)HN_YLAvsLN_YLA (I)LN_DLAvsLN_DLS.(J)HN_DLAvsHN_DLS (K)LN_YLAvsLN_YLS (L)HN_YLAvsHN_YLS. (M)LN_YRSvsLN_DRS (N)LN_YRAvsLN_DRA(O)HN_YRSvsHN_DRS. (P)HN_YRAvsHN_DRA (Q)HN_DRSvsLN_DRS (R)HN_DRAvsLN_DRA. (S)HN_YRSvsLN_YR.(T)HN_YRAvsLN_YRA (U)LN_DRAvsLN_DRS. (V)HN_DRAvsHN_DRS (W)LN_YRAvsLN_YRS (X)HN_YRAvsHN_YRS

Additional file 3.

Additional file 4: Figure 1.

Construction of therecombinant plasmid pCAMBIA1300-LUC-NiR for the luciferase reporter vector. Figure 2. Construction of the recombinant plasmid pCAMBIA1300-35S-396-5p for theluciferase localization report vector.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, Y., Zhang, J., Han, Z. et al. Screening of differentially expressed microRNAs and target genes in two potato varieties under nitrogen stress. BMC Plant Biol 22, 478 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03866-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03866-5

Keywords