Skip to main content
Download PDF

Alhagi sparsifolia acclimatizes to saline stress by regulating its osmotic, antioxidant, and nitrogen assimilation potential

BMC Plant Biology volume 22, Article number: 453 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Alhagi sparsifolia (Camelthorn) is a leguminous shrub species that dominates the Taklimakan desert’s salty, hyperarid, and infertile landscapes in northwest China. Although this plant can colonize and spread in very saline soils, how it adapts to saline stress in the seedling stage remains unclear so a pot-based experiment was carried out to evaluate the effects of four different saline stress levels (0, 50, 150, and 300 mM) on the morphological and physio-biochemical responses in A. sparsifolia seedlings.

Results

Our results revealed that N-fixing A. sparsifolia has a variety of physio-biochemical anti-saline stress acclimations, including osmotic adjustments, enzymatic mechanisms, and the allocation of metabolic resources. Shoot–root growth and chlorophyll pigments significantly decreased under intermediate and high saline stress. Additionally, increasing levels of saline stress significantly increased Na+ but decreased K+ concentrations in roots and leaves, resulting in a decreased K+/Na+ ratio and leaves accumulated more Na + and K + ions than roots, highlighting their ability to increase cellular osmolarity, favouring water fluxes from soil to leaves. Salt-induced higher lipid peroxidation significantly triggered antioxidant enzymes, both for mass-scavenging (catalase) and cytosolic fine-regulation (superoxide dismutase and peroxidase) of H2O2. Nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase/glutamate synthase also increased at low and intermediate saline stress levels but decreased under higher stress levels. Soluble proteins and proline rose at all salt levels, whereas soluble sugars increased only at low and medium stress. The results show that when under low-to-intermediate saline stress, seedlings invest more energy in osmotic adjustments but shift their investment towards antioxidant defense mechanisms under high levels of saline stress.

Conclusions

Overall, our results suggest that A. sparsifolia seedlings tolerate low, intermediate, and high salt stress by promoting high antioxidant mechanisms, osmolytes accumulations, and the maintenance of mineral N assimilation. However, a gradual decline in growth with increasing salt levels could be attributed to the diversion of energy from growth to maintain salinity homeostasis and anti-stress oxidative mechanisms.

Peer Review reports

Background

Of the drylands that cover 41% of the Earth’s surface, 15% are salt-affected [1, 2] and as a consequence, the productivity of many dryland regions, including those with saline soils, are limited by nutrient deficiency [3, 4]. Nitrogen-fixing leguminous trees and shrubs play an essential role in improving dryland soil structure and productivity as they can thrive in nitrogen-depleted soils [5] and have an important bioremediating capacity in areas subject to salinity [6, 7]. Therefore, planting plants capable of adaptation to survival in these conditions (i.e. N-deficient and salinity) is worthwhile but, nonetheless, extremely challenging [8].

It still remains unclear how young leguminous seedlings adjust their metabolism to salinity to ensure growth and survival in the hyperarid saline desert of Taklimakan (NW China). As a consequence of salinity, toxic accumulations of Na+ and Cl− occurring in the soil can enter into plants and inhibit metabolism and growth [9]. When salt concentrations increase, ionic imbalance and osmotic stress develop in plants, which can negatively affect their morphology, biomass and biochemical processes [10, 11]. To overcome this, plants have developed a variety of strategies, including (a) the elimination of excess Na + and Cl- ions to the vacuole or older parts to minimize the damage associated with excess salt ions, (b) biosynthesis of osmolytes (soluble sugar, amino acids, and proline) which protect plants salinity-induced osmotic stress and (c) activation of both enzymatic and non-enzymatic and antioxidant defence systems to remove the excess Reactive Oxidative Species (ROS) and protect plants cells from oxidative damage [12,13,14].

The enzymatic antioxidant mechanisms include changes in the activities of antioxidant enzymes [(superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD)] [15, 16]. For instance, the SOD dismutases O2- into H2O2, while POD and CAT are responsible for scavenging H2O2. These antioxidant enzymes have been reported to positively correlate with a plant’s ability to resist salt stress [17]. Plants often undergo a reduction in biomass due to salinity stress, which is linked to decreased carbon assimilation [18, 19]. Plants exposed to these conditions devote more carbon to energy production and to maintaining salinity homeostasis and stress-coping mechanisms than to plant organ development [20, 21]; a good example of this is the increased biosynthesis of stress-relieving biomolecules such as sugar and proline [22,23,24]. The accumulation and remobilization of photosynthetic products also play a key role in alleviating salt-associated damage in plants and examples include the accumulation of soluble sugar [25], starch [26] and non-structural carbohydrates [27]. Moreover, these products also play critical roles in signalling, osmotic adjustment, ROS scavenging [22] and the regulation of water transport mechanisms [28], as well as photosynthesis through feedback inhibition [22].

Leguminous plants meet nitrogen (N) requirements either by symbiotic N2 fixation or by taking up mineral N and they also use a facilitative strategy whereby symbiotic N2 fixation can be increased or decreased by reducing the N demand in terms of soil N availability [29]. Soil salinity can affect both symbiotic N2-fixation and mineral N assimilation. The extent to which these mechanisms differ between different plant species and environmental conditions remains unclear but research does report that salt ions limit NO3− reduction and NH4+ cell concentration by affecting the activities of NR, GS and GOGAT enzymes [30,31,32].

The regulation of N metabolism profoundly influences the ability of plants to tolerate salinity stress. However, the relationship between N metabolism and salinity is complex as it depends on the level and duration of salt stress, the plant species, and the quantity, type and form of N available in the soil [33,34,35]. Interestingly, most studies examining the response of N metabolism to salinity have been conducted on cultivated plants [32, 36], leaving uncertainty as to whether leguminous plants will have similar responses, particularly in drylands [37].

Alhagi sparsifolia Shap. is a perennial phreatophyte native to the saline, hyperarid desert regions of northwest China and adjacent countries in Central Asia. It serves various social and ecological services, such as preventing desertification and dunes, reducing salinization, and improving livelihoods. However, anthropogenic activities such as population growth, urbanization, industrialization, overgrazing, over-harvesting, and agricultural expansion threaten its abundance and habitats [38]. Evidence has underlined the urgent need for the revegetation and restoration of Alhagi vegetation [39]. Mature A. sparsifolia benefits from its deep and extensive root system to exploit and use the groundwater resources. However, extreme environmental conditions persist in the hyperarid desert and can severely affect its growth and metabolism, particularly at the initial growth stages, causing a severe threat to its establishment and survival since its roots have not yet reached groundwater [38]. This scenario makes planting young seedlings for vegetation restoration challenging in a hyperarid and saline desert environment [11]. Therefore, investigating the saline stress adaptation strategies in young A. sparsifolia seedlings could provide a theoretical framework for restoring Alhagi communities and protecting the fragile ecosystem of the Taklimakan desert. Previously, mature Alhagi stands in the natural desert have been studied previously for absorption of toxic salt ions [40] and N acquisition strategies [41], in response to soil factors. Research by Zeng et al. [42] also examined salt ions distribution and photosynthesis in one-year-old A. sparsifolia under different NaCl stress levels but the response of young A. sparsifolia seedlings to varying levels of saline stress still remains largely unknown.

The aim of this research was (1) to investigate the morphological and physio-biochemical responses of young A. sparsifolia seedlings to different levels of saline stress; and (2) to ascertain its level of saline stress tolerance– based on the interplay between nitrogen assimilation, antioxidant defence mechanisms, and osmolytes accumulation that is used to mitigate the negative impacts associated with an excess of salt ions. Parameters selected for measurement to meet the objectives of the research were shoot and root growth, fresh and dry biomass, chlorophyll pigment concentrations, nitrogen metabolism, osmolytes accumulation, reactive oxygen species production rate, antioxidant enzymatic activities, and root and leaf Na + and K + concentrations.

Results

Salt-stress-dependent changes in growth attributes

Salinity stress significantly decreased the growth attributes of A. sparsifolia plants compared to the controlled conditions (Figs. 1a-d and 2a-e). The fresh root weight, dry weight, length and moisture content were significantly twofold inhibited as the saline stress rose to 300 mM (Fig. 1a-d). Similarly, saline stress also significantly reduced shoot-related attributes, the maximum inhibition occurring in the highest salt-stress treatment (300 mM saline stress) (Fig. 2a-e). The fresh shoot weight, dry weight, length, and shoot water content decreased 2-, 3-, 1- and onefold, relative to the unstressed control, respectively. In addition, the root/shoot ratio increased at low salinity levels, although, by contrast, it fell at high and intermediate levels (but only significantly at high saline stress) (Fig. 2e).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effects of salinity on (a) primary root length, (b) root fresh weight, (c) root dry weight, and (d) root moisture content of Alhagi sparsifolia at days 90th of exposure to a different gradient of salinity (0, 50, 150, and 300 mM). Bars represent standard errors of the means (n = 3). According to Duncan’s Multiple Range Test, different letters indicate significant differences among the treatments at P < 0.05

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Effects of salinity on (a) shoot length, (b) shoot fresh weight, (c) shoot dry weight, (d) shoot moisture content, and (e) root/shoot ratio of Alhagi sparsifolia at days 90th of exposure to a different gradient of salinity (0, 50, 150, and 300 mM). Bars represent standard errors of the means (n = 3). According to Duncan’s Multiple Range Test, different letters indicate significant differences among the treatments at P < 0.05

Full size image

Influence of saline stress on chlorophyll concentrations

We observed a slight increase in the concentrations of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b and in the chlorophyll a/b ratio at low saline stress compared to the control treatment (Fig. 3a-c). Intermediate and high saline stress significantly decreased both chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b concentrations, although the chlorophyll a/b ratio did not change significantly, relative to the unstressed control.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effects of salinity on (a) Chlorophyll a, (b) Chlorophyll b, and (c) Chlorophyll a/Chlorophyll b ratio of Alhagi sparsifolia at days 90th of exposure to a different gradient of salinity (0, 50, 150, and 300 mM). Bars represent standard errors of the means (n = 3). According to Duncan’s Multiple Range Test, different letters indicate significant differences among the treatments at P < 0.05

Full size image

Effect of salt stress on MDA and H2O2

Saline stress gave rise to significantly higher concentrations of MDA and H2O2 compared to the controlled conditions (Fig. 4a and b). Interestingly, the maximum concentrations of MDA occurred after the addition of 150 mM and not after 300 mM (Fig. 4a). Moreover, the additions of salt stress significantly increased H2O2 levels in leaves, relative to the unstressed control, which indicates the persistence of oxidative stress in the studied plants (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effects of salinity on the concentration of (a) malondialdehyde (MDA), and (b) hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) of Alhagi sparsifolia at days 90th of exposure to a different gradient of salinity (0, 50, 150, and 300 mM). Bars represent standard errors of the means (n = 3). According to Duncan’s Multiple Range Test, different letters indicate significant differences among the treatments at P < 0.05

Full size image

Changes in the activities of antioxidant enzymes

When under stress the scavenging of reactive oxygen species is mainly associated with the production of various antioxidant enzymes that protect plants from severe oxidative damage. Moreover, SOD, POD and catalase activities were gradually enhanced as the saline stress rose, relative to the unstressed control (Fig. 5a-c). For example, SOD, POD and catalase activities increased 3-, 3-, and sevenfold, respectively, when the plants were analysed after the 300 mM saline stress application.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effects of salinity on the enzymatic activities of (a) superoxide dismutase (SOD), (b) peroxidase (POD), and (c) catalase (CAT) of Alhagi sparsifolia at days 90th of exposure to a different gradient of salinity (0, 50, 150, and 300 mM). Bars represent standard errors of the means (n = 3). According to Duncan’s Multiple Range Test, different letters indicate significant differences among the treatments at P < 0.05

Full size image

Salt-stress-dependent changes in carbohydrates, soluble protein and proline concentrations

The concentrations of carbohydrates and proline were also strongly affected by the exposure of A. sparsifolia plants to saline stress relative to the unstressed control (Fig. 6a-f). Of the carbohydrates, the soluble sugars, starch and non-structural carbohydrates were all modified in a similar way after the addition of saline stress (Fig. 6a, b, and d). Their values initially increased but then were gradually inhibited as the salt stress intensified relative to the unstressed control. The starch and non-structural carbohydrate concentrations in the 150 mM saline treatment decreased twofold compared to the 300 mM saline treatment (Fig. 6b and d). However, the soluble sugars/starch ratio acted inversely as the saline condition initially inhibited and then gradually enhanced ratio (Fig. 6c), and a twofold increase in saline stress was detected relative to the control. In the case of soluble protein concentrations, salt stress greatly enhanced its production in A. sparsifolia and a tenfold difference was recorded between the control and highest saline treatment (Fig. 6e).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Effects of salinity on the concentration of (a) soluble sugar, (b) starch, (c) soluble sugar/starch ratio, (d) nonstructural carbohydrates (NSC), (e) soluble protein, and (f) proline of Alhagi sparsifolia at days 90th of exposure to a different gradient of salinity (0, 50, 150, and 300 mM). Bars represent standard errors of the means (n = 3). According to Duncan’s Multiple Range Test, different letters indicate significant differences among the treatments at P < 0.05

Full size image

Significantly, proline accumulation initially increased vigorously but then declined after the latter two saline additions compared to controlled conditions (Fig. 6f). A fourfold difference existed between the control and 50 mM saline treatment. In contrast, it detected a twofold difference compared to plants with no salt stress in the latter two saline treatments. Finally, compared to the 50 mM saline treatment, a twofold reduction occurred in the 150 mM and 300 mM saline treatments.

Changes in Na+ and K+ in leaves and roots

The imposition of saline stresses significantly unbalanced Na+ and K+ ions in the leaves and roots of A. sparsifolia compared to the controlled conditions (Fig. 7a-f). The increasing concentrations of saline stress significantly enhanced leaf Na + levels, while the K + ion uptake was decreased (Fig. 7a and b). More specifically, when compared to the control, plants showed a twofold increment in leaf Na+ ion levels when exposed to the high saline stress (Fig. 7a). Compared to the control plants, the plants treated with 300 mM saline had a threefold inhibition in the K+/Na+ ratio (Fig. 7c). The root K+ ion and Na+ ion levels fell or were enhanced, respectively, compared to the controlled conditions. However, differences were much more significant for K+ ions (Fig. 7d, e). The same increments in Na+ ion levels occurred in roots as in leaves (Fig. 7e). The levels of K+ ions were upregulated fourfold in the high saline treatment compared to the control (Fig. 7d) and as a result their ratio had a sevenfold inhibition when plants were exposed to the 300 mM saline addition (Fig. 7f).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Effects of salinity on the concentration of (a) leaf Na+, (b) leaf K+, (c) leaf K+/Na+ (d), root Na+, (e) root K+, and (f) root K+/Na+ of Alhagi sparsifolia at days 90th of exposure to a different gradient of salinity (0, 50, 150, and 300 mM). Bars represent standard errors of the means (n = 3). According to Duncan’s Multiple Range Test, different letters indicate significant differences among the treatments at P < 0.05

Full size image

Changes in NO3 − reduction and NH4 + assimilation

The NO3− and NH4+ concentrations in A. sparsifolia plants were notable when exposed to saline stress conditions, relative to the unstressed control (Fig. 8a and b). Specifically, a significant increment was observed in NH4+ ion levels as the salt stress increased. The high-saline-treated plants had onefold greater NH4+ ion levels than the untreated plants. The NO3− ion levels fell significantly in the 50 mM and 300 mM saline treatments compared to the controlled environment, with the 300 mM saline application exerting the most powerful effect. Interestingly, the addition of 150 mM saline did not provoke any such change. The NR, GS, and GOGAT all reacted remarkably as their activities were initially enhanced but then decreased in the high treatment (Fig. 8c-e). Surprisingly, their (NR, GS, and GOGAT) activities fell significantly after the 300 mM saline application relative to the150mM saline treatment.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Effects of salinity on the concentration of (a) NO3− and (b) NH4+ and enzymatic activities of (c) nitrate reductase (NR), (d) glutamine synthetase (GS), and (e) glutamate synthase (GOGAT) of Alhagi sparsifolia at days 90th of exposure to a different gradient of salinity (0, 50, 150, and 300 mM). Bars represent standard errors of the means (n = 3). According to Duncan’s Multiple Range Test, different letters indicate significant differences among the treatments at P < 0.05

Full size image

Principal component analysis (PCA)

The PCA showed along the first PC axis (explaining the 69.1% of total variables variance) that the sets of samples of plants submitted to different levels of salinity had distinct coefficient scores positions in the same order than salinity intensity (Fig. 9). This axis was mainly loaded by plant Na+ and K+ concentrations, chlorophyll contents, H2O2 concentrations and enzymes related to ROS elimination. Along PC 2 axis (explaining 15.2% of total variables variance) it was observed that the sample sets of plant growing at intermediate levels of soil salinity were separated by their higher concentrations of proline, enzymes related to N metabolism and sugars contents (Fig. 9).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Principal component analysis (PCA) between various growth and physio-biochemical attributes of Alhagi sparsifolia at days 90th of exposure to a different gradient of salinity (0, 50, 150, and 300 mM). Acronyms of variables SL = Shoot length, SFW = Shoot fresh weight, SDW = Shoot dry weight, SMC = Shoot moisture content, PRL = Primary root length, RFW = Root fresh weight, RDW = Root dry weight, RMC = Root moisture content, RSR = Root shoot ratio, Chla = Chlorophyll a, Chlb = Chlorophyll b, SP = Soluble protein, MDA = Malondialdehyde, H2O2 = Hydrogen peroxide, SOD = Superoxide dismutase, POD = Peroxidase activity, CAT = Catalase, NR = Nitrate reductase, GS = glutamine synthetase, GOGAT, P = Proline, SS = Soluble sugar, ST = Starch, NSC = Non-structural carbohydrates, L-K+  = Leaf K+, L-Na+  = Leaf Na+, R-K+  = Root K+, R-Na+  = Root Na+

Full size image

Discussion

Changes in growth and biomass accumulation

The assessment of biomass accumulation in plants exposed to salinity can be used as a cohesive attribute for predicting the responses of plants to salinity stress [43]. According to our study, increasing saline stress decreased the biomass, length, and water content of both shoots and roots of A. sparsifolia. A salt-induced reduction in shoot and root growth and biomass attributes has also previously been reported in other plant species [10, 18, 19, 44, 45], supporting our findings. Salt-induced reduction in plant biomass is a crucial survival strategy associated with reduced carbon (C) assimilation [18, 19] as under these conditions, plants allocate more C to energy and maintaining salinity homeostasis (anti-stress mechanisms) than to development and growth [20, 21, 46]. For instance, the biosynthesis and accumulation of stress-relieving biomolecules such as sugar and proline [22,23,24] is a trade-off with growth, i.e., the resources needed to sustain growth is reduced. Therefore, we can potentially attribute the decrease in growth in A. sparsifolia to the allocation of resources by young seedlings to anti-oxidant and osmotic adjustment mechanisms provoked by soil salinity rather than growth. Additionally, the root/shoot ratio also increased (non-significantly) at low salinity levels and belowground biomass dispatch for maintaining a high root-shoot ratio is regarded as one of the key adaptative responses to standing salt stress, which involves directing photosynthetic products to the most limiting organ of the plant [47,48,49]. The root-shoot ratio then also decreased with salinity levels relative to unstressed control and it has been previously reported that high salt stress reduces the distribution of photoassimilates to the root system [50], leading to a low root-shoot ratio. Therefore, we can suggest that increasing salinity stress reduced the root growth by decreasing the allocation of photoassimilates to roots to establish a possible joint plant mechanism to improve water fluxes from soil to leaves by creating a favorable osmotic pathway.

Photosynthetic pigments

Variations in chlorophyll concentrations have an impact on plant metabolism [51]. Both chlorophyll a chlorophyll b fell significantly under intermediate and high saline stress similar to other research in salt-stressed plants [52,53,54,55]. As a response to salt stress, chlorophyllase activity increases, which leads to a decrease in chlorophyll concentrations as salt-stress levels increases with the extent of the decline in salt stress varying between plant species [56].

The salt-induced response of chlorophyll pigments is recognized as one of several biochemical indicators of salt tolerance in plants [57]. In comparison, increases in the chlorophyll a and chlorophyll a/b ratios in our study were observed at low saline stress which reflects other research that found that a salt-induced increase in chlorophyll concentrations in plants could be attributed to the rise in chloroplast numbers [58, 59]. The results of this research also confirm that salt stress is more detrimental to chlorophyll b than chlorophyll a [60] and this then creates a high chlorophyll a/b ratio since the very first step of chlorophyll b breakdown is its transformation into chlorophyll a [61]. Similar research has suggested that the salt-stress resistance of photosystem II (PSII) and the increased chlorophyll concentrations in plants play an essential role in salt tolerance [58] so it could also be debated that PSII is a crucial element in the salt tolerance of A. sparsifolia, although further research on this subject is still needed.

Ion distribution

Plants under salt stress take up and distribute salt ions via a number of mechanisms [62, 63]. In our study, in agreement with other studies, the accumulation of Na+ in root and leaf tissues caused a nutrient imbalance, as shown by the lower K+/Na+ ratio as salinity stress levels rose that resulted in plant tissues accumulating less dry matter and growing less [64,65,66]. The concentration of K+ may have also fallen antagonistically during the absorption of nutrients due to competition with Na+ or to the similarity of its charge. In our study, the saline conditions appears to have impaired high potassium transporters (HKT), which are Na+- K+ symporters in plants and play an important role in salt tolerance by maintaining K+ uptake through K+- Na+ cotransport [67]. It has been widely speculated that plants under salt stress regulate Na+ uptake and transport by maintaining high tissue K+/Na+ ratios and, therefore, high cytosolic K+/Na+ ratios, an idea that has become central to salt-tolerance research. K+ is crucially important in various physiological processes in plants and in situations of salt stress, high levels of surrounding Na+ compete with K+ uptake and cause severe K+ deficiency and growth impairment [68]. Na+ ion-induced outflow of K+ from roots and leaves are a significant effect of salt stress on K+ regulation [17, 69]. This efflux could potentially be attributed to the excess Na+ in the cytoplasm, resulting in lower membrane potential and, consequently, the activation of K+ outward rectifier channels, which is thought to be the mechanism by which K+ is extruded from cells. Decreasing K+ levels in A. sparsifolia with increasing saline stress could be the result of a salt-induced inhibition of the ability of cells to maintain a more negative inside potential and so improve intracellular retention of K+ (or inhibition of K+ efflux) [70]. The ability to retain intracellular K+ has also been proposed as crucial for salt stress resistance [71]. In our study, the salt-induced retention of cellular K+ decreased with increasing saline stress levels with A. sparsifolia retaining cellular K+ at low salinity levels but losing this ability as the salt concentrations rise to 150 mM and 300 mM demonstrating that its ability to maintain K+ retention is dependent on salt concentrations.

In addition, Na+ ions enter roots passively through voltage-independent or faintly voltage-dependent non-selective cation channels so an increase in external Na+ will result in a moderate rise in Na+ uptake and accumulation, with a consequent reduction in K+ uptake [64, 65]. In this study, the concentrations of these ions were higher in leaves than in roots, which has also been reported in other research [59, 72, 73]. Mature A. sparsifolia plants in natural deserts have been reported to exhibit a high degree of ion selectivity as a result of arresting excess Na+, which keeps salt levels in roots high compared to in leaves [72]. Similarly, other research has also reported that Na+ accumulation in tissues of natural mature A. sparsifolia plants followed the order root > stem > leaf [74]. Mature A. sparsifolia vegetation in natural deserts appears to be most effective at restricting Na+ in root tissues whilst in comparison, field-grown A. sparsifolia plants form interconnected clones with extensive root systems that probably enable them to dilute and limit excess salt in their roots, which was not possible in our pot experiment with young seedlings. If Na+ is transported from roots to shoots when the transpiration stream in the xylem moves [75] it could also be proposed that the increase in leaf Na+ and K+ ions could be an important survival strategy for juvenile A. sparsifolia seedlings where they may use excess ions as osmolytes to decrease the leaf water potential and increase water absorption, and so normalize their photosynthetic capacity.

Lipid peroxidation, ROS production and antioxidant system

Given its ability to act as indicator of oxidative damage induced by salt stress, lipid peroxidation may be an adequate physiological indicator for evaluating plant stress resulting from both biotic and abiotic factors. This research recorded significantly higher accumulations of MDA and H2O2 at all levels of saline stress. An increase in leaf H2O2 could have led to membrane damage in young A. sparsifolia due to lipid peroxidation, and to the production of MDA [22, 55, 65]. In addition, ROS not only serve as stress-signalling molecules [76] but also plays an essential role in regulating growth [77] and development [78]. For example, a high H2O2content should not be viewed simply as a harmful phenomenon to be avoided or alleviated but, instead, also as a necessity for plants needing to respond and adapt effectively and initiate better acclimatization mechanisms [76].

Plants have a highly specialized antioxidant enzymatic defence system responsible for scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS) at cellular level when under salt stress [34]. In this study, antioxidant enzymes (SOD, POD and CAT) were significantly more abundant in saline-treated A. sparsifolia seedlings than in the control. For instance, compared to the control, SOD, POD and CAT increased 3-, 3- and sevenfold, respectively, under 300 mM saline stress indicating that it is a solid antioxidant mechanism for detoxifying ROS [34, 79, 80]. SOD is the first line of defence in the antioxidant defence mechanisms, as it converts the superoxides into H2O2 and subsequently conversion of H2O2 into H2O and oxygen is performed by CAT. Under stress conditions, low levels of H2O2 may play a role in signalling [81]. H2O2-detoxifying enzymes restrict the amount of H2O2 that cells accumulate rather than eliminate it completely and in addition, POD also scavenges H2O2 efficiently from the chloroplast [80, 82]. Several studies have reported more SOD, CAT and POD activity in plants subjected to salt stress [45, 65, 80]. However, the relative significance of each antioxidant enzymatic activity (SOD, POD and CAT) needed for scavenging ROS varies from one plant to another in terms of the rates of ROS production and the major sources of ROS, as well as the respective antioxidative activities.

In our study, CAT activity was (sevenfold) greater than POD (threefold) at 300 mM saline stress than in the control, which reflects the greater accumulation of H2O2 at high salt stress. Generally, the affinity of CAT for H2O2 is lower than that of POD, although a bulk accumulation of ROS clearly induced CAT activity. With increasing saline stress, A. sparsifolia as an adaption mechanism may have increased POD to ensure the cytosolic regulation of H2O2, whereas the higher CAT activity could be linked to the mass scavenging of H2O2 [76]. A recent study of Echinochloa crusgalli mutants has also demonstrated that POD, APX and GR are involved in fine-tuning ROS production, and that their loss can lead to high levels of ROS, which in turn affects CAT development. CAT is however, unable to reduce H2O2 to physiological concentrations due to its low affinity so plants suffer from oxidative stress even in the presence of high CAT activity [83]. This study demonstrates that A. sparsifolia contains reliable antioxidant mechanisms, both for cytosolic fine-regulation (SOD and POD) and mass-scavenging H2O2 [60], which could help reduce the detrimental effects of oxidative stress induced by high lipid peroxidation levels. However, a gradual response of these enzymes to gradual increases in saline stress suggests that this plant species has an excellent capacity to adapt to saline stress, including mechanisms especially designed to increase activity when salinity conditions are high.

Biochemical changes and their role in role in salt mitigation

This study recorded a significant accumulation of proline at all saline stress levels, which may contribute to the protection of the photosynthetic apparatus, the elimination of ROS, and the stabilization of membranes, enzymes, and proteins in salt-stressed young A. sparsifolia [84,85,86]. Additionally, there was a significant increase in soluble sugar at low and intermediate levels, although, compared to the controls, starch content only increased at low levels (Fig. 9). In plants, soluble sugars play several vital roles, including limiting water loss and chlorophyll degradation, regulating cell division, eliminating excess ROS, stabilizing proteins and membrane structure, maintaining osmotic and ionic homeostasis, and controlling transcription of certain genes [22]. Increased salt levels significantly decreased starch accumulation and significantly increasing soluble sugar at 150 mM saline stress (Fig. 9). This might be due to greater activity by the starch-degrading enzymes that mobilize sugars via an intricate network of reactions, as demonstrated in the plant A. thaliana, where multiple enzymes work synergistically [87]. The accumulation of starch and soluble sugars and their interrelationships demonstrated in this result that they play a significant role in the salt tolerance of young A. sparsifolia at low and intermediate saline stress levels (Fig. 9) [25,26,27].

High soluble sugar/starch ratio recorded in this study indicate that in the hyperarid saline desert, this could be viewed as an adaptive strategy of young A. sparsifolia for synthesizing the enzymes of soluble sugars and avoiding the synthesis of starch enzymes in order to accumulate soluble sugar and adjust the osmotic pressure to maintain water uptake. Proteins also have the potential to act as osmotins and play a part in the development of tolerance to salt stress as identified in other research [11, 88, 89]. In this research, protein concentrations significantly increased in A. sparsifolia at all levels of saline stress (low salt < intermediate salt < high salt). Under saline stress, the accumulation of soluble protein in young A. sparsifolia may contribute to the osmotic adjustment and to the supply of nitrogen that can be utilized once the salt stress is abated [85, 86].

Nitrogen assimilation

To ensure salt tolerance, the regulation of nitrogen (N) metabolism is of vital importance, and a complex interplay occurs between salinity and N nutrition [90]. In this study, although, NO3− levels fell significantly at 50 mM and 300 mM saline stress, at 150 mM no significant changes relative to the control occurred (Fig. 8b). Lower levels of NO3− impede N assimilation and the synthesis of amino acids and proteins, which can result in a fall in plant dry weight [91]. Salt ions also limit NO3− reduction by affecting the activity of NR [31, 32, 92]. In contrast to other research this study found that NR activity showed no significant changes at low or high saline stress levels (Fig. 9), and even increased at intermediate saline stress [31, 32]. This could be explained as young plants that have not initiated nodulations have been reported to have less restricted mineral N metabolism due to salinity and they can then germinate and grow in places that have been flooded where soil salt concentrations are lower [93].

It has long been understood that the GS/GOGAT cycle links N and C metabolism in plants by binding inorganic NH4+ with C skeleton synthesis, a critical step in the metabolism and growth of plants [94]. In this study, GS and GOGAT activities were initially enhanced and then decreased under high saline stress (Fig. 5d, e, and f), indicating that A. sparsifolia under low and intermediate saline stress could incorporate NH4+ effectively to fill its glutamate pool. Even though high salt stress significantly decreased the GS/GOGAT cycle, higher level of soluble proteins and antioxidant enzymes observed in A. sparsifolia could be attributed to its N-fixing ability. For instance, the nodulation and biological N2 fixation of A. sparsifolia has been reported to exhibit high salt tolerance [41, 72]. Under high salinity stress with a retarded GS/GOGAT cycle, A. sparsifolia could have the capacity to allocate sufficient energy (sugars) to sustain the bacterial symbionts that ensure a certain level of organic nitrogen for the synthesis of anti-oxidative enzymes.

The assessing of biomass accumulation in plants exposed to salinity can be used as a cohesive attribute for predicting the responses of plants to salinity stress [43]. In this experiment, the imposition of saline stress significantly influenced the biomass and growth attributes of A. sparsifolia plants and shoot and root length, shoot and root biomass, and shoot and root water content were significantly inhibited as saline stress increased (Fig. 1). A salt-induced reduction in shoot and root growth and biomass attributes has been previously reported in other plant species [10, 18, 19, 44, 45]. The decrease in growth in A. sparsifolia appears to be associated with the allocation of resources by seedlings to anti-oxidant and osmotic adjustment mechanisms provoked by soil salinity rather than to growth.

Conclusion

The saline stress treatments in our experiment elicited different responses in plant growth and physiological traits. Young A. sparsifolia seedlings demonstrated the use of a wide range of salt-tolerant strategies to tolerate low-to-high saline stress, including (i) increased enzymatic anti-oxidant defense mechanism to reduce oxidative stress through the inhibition of ROS and MDA accumulations (ii) enhanced osmolytes synthesis (iii) maintenance of mineral N metabolism (iv) increased chlorophyll a/b ratio and (v), accumulating higher levels of Na + and K + ions in leaves compared to roots that could act as osmolytes to decrease the leaf water potential and increase water absorption for the normalization of metabolism, in hyperarid desert condition. The results strongly suggest a high capacity by A. sparsifolia seedlings to manage with low and intermediate-to-high levels of soil salinity; but at very high levels of salinity, the excess of ROS production cannot be fully (or with great difficulty) counteracted and plants can still survive, albeit with reduced growth. Consistent with this observation, were the recorded shifts from more osmolytes adjustment mechanisms to anti-oxidative stress mechanisms, such as the synthesis of anti-oxidative stress enzymes when salinity rose from low-intermediate to high intensity. The results of this research provide a baseline study to improve knowledge of the salt-induced changes in the growth and physiological mechanisms of young A. sparsifolia plants in hyperarid saline deserts and potentially assist in future planting of A. sparsifolia seeds to improve vegetation restoration in the Taklimakan desert. Further research is required however to understand the underlying physio-biochemical and molecular mechanisms operating under saline stress conditions to increase knowledge of the salt-tolerance capacity of young A. sparsifolia plants.

Materials and methods

A randomized block design (RBD) using pots protected from the rain to control the desired concentration of the applied salt solution was set up as an outdoor experiment in the vicinity of Qira oasis on the southern fringe of the Taklimakan desert (37°00′N, 80°43′E). The annual average temperature in the area is 11.9 °C, with extremes of 41.9 °C and -23.9 °C. The vegetation around the oasis is sparse, with cover of 5–20%, and is composed primarily of shrubs and sub-shrubs such as A. sparsifolia and Tamarix ramosissima.

We collected A. sparsifolia seeds from the desert and planted them in plastic pots (30-cm diameter at the top and 25-cm at the bottom, 25-cm high) filled with 12 kg of soil, and with a hole in the bottom. During the first 50 days, water was supplied to each pot (n = 1 seedling) every three days to field capacity (18% w/w) using a weight method. The pots were watered and weighed to replace the evaporated and transpired water. We calculated the soil relative water content (SRWC) using the following formula:

$$SRWC=([(Wsoil-Wpot-DWsoil)/( (\mathrm{WFC}-\mathrm{Wpot}-\mathrm{DWsoil})]*100)$$

In this equation, Wsoil represents the current soil weight (soil + pot + water), Wpot represents the weight of the empty pot, DWsoil the dry soil weight, and WFC the soil weight at field capacity (soil + pot + water). We selected 48 pots with uniform seedlings and divided them into four groups for the application of the stress treatments: three sets of 12 pots for saline stress (NaCl and Na2SO4, each at a 1:1 molar ratio) and one set of 12 pots for the positive control (0 mM). To avoid osmotic shock, we gradually introduced salt stress by adding 50 mM L−1 of saline solution to the stress treatment groups for the first week. Afterwards, saline stress concentrations of 50, 150, and 300 mM were applied. The salt chemicals were mixed in water (500 ml/pot) and applied after every four days. The doses selected were based on real conditions occurring in the field to stimulate saline osmosis stress. Finally, after 90 days of growth, we harvested the leaves of the seedlings and immediately stored them at -80 °C until further analysis (see below).

Determination of growth parameters

We harvested three randomly selected A. sparsifolia seedlings and measured their shoot height, root length, shoot and root fresh weights, shoot and root dry weights, and water content.

Measurement of photosynthetic pigments

Chlorophyll (0.1–0.3 g fresh leaves) was extracted from the leaves using ethanol (95%, vol/vol) and measured at 665 and 649 nm following the method described by [95]. We calculated the chlorophyll concentrations using the following equations (mg g−1 FW):

$$\text{Chl a = 13.98 A665 - 6.88 A649}$$
(1)
$$\text{Chl b = 24.96 A649 - 7.32 A665}$$
(2)
$$\text{Chl a/b = Chl a / Chl b}$$
(3)

Oxidative stress indicators

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) concentrations were measured using a standardized method [96]. Fresh leaves (0.2 g) were homogenized in 5 ml of trichloroacetic acid (0.1%) in an ice bath, transferred to test tubes, and finally centrifuged at 5000 × g for 10 min (4 °C). The supernatant containing 0.1 mL of titanium reagent (50 µL of 20% titanium tetrachloride) and 0.2 mL of ammonia was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min. After washing five times with acetone, the precipitate was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min and then 3 mL of 1 M H2SO4 was added. The absorbance was read at 410 nm.

Malondialdehyde (MDA) was assessed based on the thiobarbituric acid (TBA) test [97]. Fresh leaves (0.5 g) were homogenized in 1 ml of 5% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and centrifuged for 10 min at 5000 g (4 °C). In a separate test tube, 4 ml of the supernatant was added to 2 ml of 20% TCA and the mixture was then heated at 100 °C for 15 min and centrifuged at 5000 g (10 min). A spectrophotometer was used to measure absorbance at 450, 532 and 600 nm; the concentrations of MDA were calculated using the following equation:

$$\text{MDA (mol }{\text{g}}^{-1}\text{ FW) = = 6.45 (A532- A600) - 0.56A450.}$$

Antioxidant enzyme activity

We homogenized the ground leaves in a chilled mortar with 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) with 0.5 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Afterwards, the homogenate was centrifuged for 10 min at 8000 × g and 4 °C. The activity of SOD was assayed by measuring the reduction rate of nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) at 560 nm [98]. One unit of SOD activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required for 50% inhibition of NBT reduction at 560 nm.

The POD activity was determined according to standard methods [99, 100], with minor modifications. A reaction mixture was prepared by mixing 2 ml of buffer substrate (8 mM guaiacol and 100 mM Na3PO4 pH 6.4), 24 mM H2O2 in 0.5 ml of enzyme extract). At 460 nm, absorbance values were measured twice at 1-min intervals. We calculated enzyme activity by increasing the absorbance of the reaction system by 0.01 up to a maximum of 1U per min, which was then converted into U/g·min − 1. CAT activity was determined by monitoring the disappearance of H2O2 [101]. Initially, 50 mL of enzyme extract was poured into 1.5 mL of reaction mixture containing 50 mM K-phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and 15 mM H2O2. One unit of CAT corresponds to one mole of H2O2 degradation per minute measured at 240 nm for 1 min. The absorbance was recorded at 240 nm for 1 min. One unit of CAT corresponds to one mole of H2O2 degradation per min.

Determination of nitrate assimilation enzymes

Nitrate reductase [102] activity was determined by homogenizing fresh leaves (0.2 g) in 2 mL of 25 mM phosphate buffer saline (PBS, pH 8.7) containing 10 mM cysteine and 1 mM EDTA, which was then centrifuged for 20 min at 30,000 g. The resulting supernatant was tested for NR activity using a diazocoupling method with Griess reagent [103]. The GS activity of frozen leaves was determined by homogenizing them in 2 mL of 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 7.8; containing 15% glycerol, 0.1% TritonX-100, 1 mM of EDTA and 14 mM of 2-mercaptoethanol) and centrifuging them twice at 4 °C for 10 min. After complexing with acidified ferric chloride, the supernatant was used to determine GS (EC 6.3.1.2) with a 540 nm fluorescence measurement [104]. To determine GOGAT activity, the reaction mixture was composed of 20 mM L-glutamine, 100 mM α-ketoglutaric acid, 10 mM KCl, and 3 mM NADH in 25 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.6), to which the plant extract was added to initiate the reaction. The absorbance at 340 nm was continuously recorded to monitor the NADH oxidation [104].

Determination of biochemical parameters

A ball mill was used to grind the dried leaves samples. The colorimetric determination of sugar concentrations was performed by extracting soluble sugar with ethanol according to a standardized method [105]. Starch was measured after perchloric acid extraction (35%; v/v) and analyzed colorimetrically at 620 nm using a slightly modified anthrone method [106]. NSC was obtained by summing the soluble sugar and starch concentrations.

The concentration of Proline (0.2 g fresh levees) was determined using ninhydrin following a standard procedure (105) Toluene was used as a blank for measuring the absorption at 520 nm [107]. Approximately 0.3 g of fresh leaves were used to determine the concentrations of soluble proteins [108], with bovine serum albumin used as the standard. We homogenized 0.2 g of frozen leaves in 5 mL of deionized water to determine NO3−; for NH4+ determination, we homogenized 0.2 g of frozen leaves in 2 mL of 10% HCl. A quantitative colorimetric method [109], was used to analyze the supernatants.

Determination of Na+ and K+

Each dry root and leaf sample (0.05 g) was digested with concentrated HNO3 (3 mL). Then the extracts were brought up and adjusted to 15 mL with deionized water. The concentrations of Na+ and K+ in leaf and root samples were determined using inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), according to a standard method [110].

Statistical analysis

We repeated all measurements three times and then organized the data with a Microsoft Excel 2019 spreadsheet in terms of the mean values ± SE. The assessment of normality and homogeneity was performed using the Shapiro–Wilk normality test. A one-way analysis of variance was performed with SPSS software (version 13.0; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). To make pairwise comparisons of the mean values for a given response variable, Duncan’s multiple range test was used with an alpha level of 0.05 for significance. The graphics in the figures were created using Origin Pro 2019 software (Origin Lab Corporation Northampton, MA, USA). To aid interpretation, Pearson correlation analyses (PCA) of the leaf chlorophyll pigment concentrations, N metabolism, osmolytes accumulation, reactive oxygen species production rate, and antioxidant enzymatic activities, as well as root and leaf Na+ and K+ concentrations, were performed using Origin Pro 2019 software (Origin Lab Corporation Northampton, MA, USA).

To determine the overall relationships of studied plant variables among the samples of plants submitted to distinct intensities of salinity, we used principal component analyses (PCAs) to determine the overall differences of the the studies variables among different salinity levels. We first analysed the data quality by the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure and also eliminated variables with excessive multicollinearity. We conducted one-way ANOVAs with Bonferroni post hoc tests of the scores of the first PC axes to determine differences among the treatments by using Statistica 8.0 (StatSoft, Inc. Tule, Oklahoma, USA).

Availability of data and materials

All the data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Schimel DS. Drylands in the earth system. Science. 2010;327:418–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghiassee M, Sheybani M, Habibi A, Goli A. Aridity and Landscape Evaluation of the Landscape Indices in Drylands. MANZAR Scientific J Landsc. 2019;11:14–25.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Acosta-Motos JR, Ortuño MF, Bernal-Vicente A, Diaz-Vivancos P, Sanchez-Blanco MJ, Hernandez JA. Plant responses to salt stress: adaptive mechanisms. Agronomy. 2017;7:18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gamalero E, Bona E, Todeschini V, Lingua G. Saline and arid soils: Impact on bacteria, plants, and their interaction. Biology. 2020;9:116.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Dovrat G, Sheffer E. Symbiotic dinitrogen fixation is seasonal and strongly regulated in water-limited environments. New Phytol. 2019;221:1866–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cocks PS. Ecology of herbaceous perennial legumes: a review of characteristics that may provide management options for the control of salinity and waterlogging in dryland cropping systems. Aust J Agric Res. 2001;52:137–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Abdalla MA, AwadElkarim AH, Taniguchi T, Endo T, Yamanaka N. Phytoremediation of calcareous saline-sodic soils with mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa). Acta Agric Scand B Soil Plant Sci. 2017;67:352–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhattachan A, D’Odorico P, Dintwe K, Okin GS, Collins SL. Resilience and recovery potential of duneland vegetation in the southern Kalahari. Ecosphere. 2014;5:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Teakle NL, Tyerman SD. Mechanisms of Cl-transport contributing to salt tolerance. Plant Cell Environ. 2010;33:566–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rahneshan Z, Nasibi F, Moghadam AA. Effects of salinity stress on some growth, physiological, biochemical parameters and nutrients in two pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) rootstocks. J Plant inteRact. 2018;13:73–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang M, Fang Y, Ji Y, Jiang Z, Wang L. Effects of salt stress on ion content, antioxidant enzymes and protein profile in different tissues of Broussonetia papyrifera. S Afr J Bot. 2013;85:1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rahman M, Mostofa MG, Islam M, Keya SS, Das AK, Miah M, et al. Acetic acid: A cost-effective agent for mitigation of seawater-induced salt toxicity in mung bean. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Patel MK, Kumar M, Li W, Luo Y, Burritt DJ, Alkan N, et al. Enhancing salt tolerance of plants: From metabolic reprogramming to exogenous chemical treatments and molecular approaches. Cells. 2020;9:2492.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Mostofa MG, Rahman MM, Ansary MMU, Keya SS, Abdelrahman M, Miah MG, et al. Silicon in mitigation of abiotic stress-induced oxidative damage in plants. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2021;41:918–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sarker U, Oba S. The response of salinity stress-induced A. tricolor to growth, anatomy, physiology, non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidants. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:559876.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Shafeiee M, Ehsanzadeh P. Physiological and biochemical mechanisms of salinity tolerance in several fennel genotypes: Existence of clearly-expressed genotypic variations. Ind Crops Prod. 2019;132:311–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang W-B, Kim Y-H, Lee H-S, Kim K-Y, Deng X-P, Kwak S-S. Analysis of antioxidant enzyme activity during germination of alfalfa under salt and drought stresses. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2009;47:570–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nackley LL, Kim S-H. A salt on the bioenergy and biological invasions debate: salinity tolerance of the invasive biomass feedstock a rundo donax. Gcb Bioenergy. 2015;7:752–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pompeiano A, Landi M, Meloni G, Vita F, Guglielminetti L, Guidi L. Allocation pattern, ion partitioning, and chlorophyll a fluorescence in Arundo donax L. in responses to salinity stress. Plant Biosyst Int J Dealing Aspects Plant Biol. 2017;151:613–22.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Asrar H, Hussain T, Hadi SMS, Gul B, Nielsen BL, Khan MA. Salinity induced changes in light harvesting and carbon assimilating complexes of Desmostachya bipinnata (L.) Staph. Environ Exp Bot. 2017;135:86–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kumar A, Kumar A, Lata C, Kumar S. Eco-physiological responses of Aeluropus lagopoides (grass halophyte) and Suaeda nudiflora (non-grass halophyte) under individual and interactive sodic and salt stress. S Afr J Bot. 2016;105:36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sami F, Yusuf M, Faizan M, Faraz A, Hayat S. Role of sugars under abiotic stress. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016;109:54–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Slama I, Abdelly C, Bouchereau A, Flowers T, Savouré A. Diversity, distribution and roles of osmoprotective compounds accumulated in halophytes under abiotic stress. Ann Bot. 2015;115:433–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang Y, Guo Y. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms mediating plant salt-stress responses. New Phytol. 2018;217:523–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nemati I, Moradi F, Gholizadeh S, Esmaeili MA, Bihamta MR. The effect of salinity stress on ions and soluble sugars distribution in leaves, leaf sheaths and roots of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. Plant Soil Environ. 2011;57:26–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Thalmann M, Santelia D. Starch as a determinant of plant fitness under abiotic stress. New Phytol. 2017;214:943–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu W, Su J, Li S, Lang X, Huang X. Non-structural carbohydrates regulated by season and species in the subtropical monsoon broad-leaved evergreen forest of Yunnan Province. China Sci Rep. 2018;8:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Secchi F, Gilbert ME, Zwieniecki MA. Transcriptome response to embolism formation in stems of Populus trichocarpa provides insight into signaling and the biology of refilling. Plant Physiol. 2011;157:1419–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Tariq A, Graciano C, Pan K, Olatunji OA, Li Z, Sadia S, et al. Phosphorus fertilization of phoebe zhennan seedlings under drought reduces nitrogen assimilation. J Plant Nutr. 2022;45:1–11.

  30. Debouba M, Gouia H, Suzuki A, Ghorbel MH. NaCl stress effects on enzymes involved in nitrogen assimilation pathway in tomato “Lycopersicon esculentum” seedlings. J Plant Physiol. 2006;163:1247–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Meng S, Su L, Li Y, Wang Y, Zhang C, Zhao Z. Nitrate and ammonium contribute to the distinct nitrogen metabolism of Populus simonii during moderate salt stress. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0150354.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ullah A, Li M, Noor J, Tariq A, Liu Y, Shi L. Effects of salinity on photosynthetic traits, ion homeostasis and nitrogen metabolism in wild and cultivated soybean. PeerJ. 2019;7:e8191.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Dai J, Duan L, Dong H. Comparative effect of nitrogen forms on nitrogen uptake and cotton growth under salinity stress. J Plant Nutr. 2015;38:1530–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Munns R, Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:651–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Teh C-Y, Shaharuddin NA, Ho C-L, Mahmood M. Exogenous proline significantly affects the plant growth and nitrogen assimilation enzymes activities in rice (Oryza sativa) under salt stress. Acta Physiol Plant. 2016;38:1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sofy MR, Elhawat N, Alshaal T. Glycine betaine counters salinity stress by maintaining high K+/Na+ ratio and antioxidant defense via limiting Na+ uptake in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020;200:110732.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ashraf M, Shahzad SM, Imtiaz M, Rizwan MS. Salinity effects on nitrogen metabolism in plants–focusing on the activities of nitrogen metabolizing enzymes: A review. J Plant Nutr. 2018;41:1065–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Tariq A, Ullah A, Sardans J, Zeng F, Graciano C, Li X, et al. Alhagi sparsifolia: An ideal phreatophyte for combating desertification and land degradation. Sci Total Environ. 2022;844:157228.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zeng F, Zhang X, Li X. Study on the characteristics of Alhagi sparsifolia and its impact on resoverce protection and development. Arid Land Geogr. 2002;25:286–8.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang B, Gui D, Gao X, Shareef M, Li L, Zeng F. Controlling soil factor in plant growth and salt tolerance of leguminous plant Alhagi sparsifolia Shap. in saline deserts, Northwest China. Contemp Probl Ecol. 2018;11:111–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Li M, Petrie MD, Tariq A, Zeng F. Response of nodulation, nitrogen fixation to salt stress in a desert legume Alhagi sparsifolia. Environ Exp Bot. 2021;183:104348.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Zeng J, Zeng F, Arndt SK, Guo H, Yan H, Xing W, et al. Growth, physiological characteristics and ion distribution of NaCl stressed Alhagi sparsifolia seedlings. Chin Sci Bull. 2008;53:169–76.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Wilson PM, Longley K, Muon S, Rodgers WM, Murray TC. Examining the contributions of perceived psychological need satisfaction to well-being in exercise 1. J Appl Biobehav Res. 2006;11(3–4):243–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Shaheen S, Naseer S, Ashraf M, Akram NA. Salt stress affects water relations, photosynthesis, and oxidative defense mechanisms in Solanum melongena L. J Plant Interact. 2013;8:85–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Sahin U, Ekinci M, Ors S, Turan M, Yildiz S, Yildirim E. Effects of individual and combined effects of salinity and drought on physiological, nutritional and biochemical properties of cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata). Sci Hortic. 2018;240:196–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Van Zandt PA, Tobler MA, Mouton E, Hasenstein KH, Mopper S. Positive and negative consequences of salinity stress for the growth and reproduction of the clonal plant, Iris hexagona. J Ecol 2003;91:837–46.

  47. Perez-Alfocea F, Balibrea ME, Cruz AS, Estan MT. Agronomical and physiological characterization of salinity tolerance in a commercial tomato hybrid. Plant Soil. 1996;180:251–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Wanwen Y, Banghua C, Liyun W. Growths and mineral nutrient balance of black locust clones under salt stress. Acta Botan Boreali-Occiden Sin. 2005;25:2097–102.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Suping W, Juan L, Shirong G, Xiaohui H, Jing L, Tian W. Effects of NaCl stress on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of cucumber ({\sl Cucumber sativus} L.) seedlings. Acta Bot Boreal Occid Sin. 2006;26:455–61.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Bernstein N, Kafkafi U. Root growth under salinity stress. In: Plant Roots. In Plant Roots; Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2002. p. 1222–1250.

  51. Grotewold E. The genetics and biochemistry of floral pigments. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:761–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Li M, Xu M, Xu J-S, Ullah A, Shi L-X. Gas Exchange and Ionomic Changes in Wild and Cultivated Soybean Seedlings under Salt Stress. Int J Agric Biol. 2019;22:1627–35.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Meriem BF, Kaouther Z, Chérif H, Tijani M, André B. Effect of priming on growth, biochemical parameters and mineral composition of different cultivars of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) under salt stress. J Stress Physiol Biochem. 2014;10:84–109.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Noor J, Ullah A, Saleem MH, Tariq A, Ullah S, Waheed A, et al. Effect of Jasmonic Acid Foliar Spray on the Morpho-Physiological Mechanism of Salt Stress Tolerance in Two Soybean Varieties (Glycine max L.). Plants. 2022;11:651.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Sharif P, Seyedsalehi M, Paladino O, Van Damme P, Sillanpää M, Sharifi AA. Effect of drought and salinity stresses on morphological and physiological characteristics of canola. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2018;15:1859–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Yang JY, Zheng W, Tian Y, Wu Y, Zhou DW. Effects of various mixed salt-alkaline stresses on growth, photosynthesis, and photosynthetic pigment concentrations of Medicago ruthenica seedlings. Photosynthetica. 2011;49:275–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Akram MS, Ashraf M. Exogenous application of potassium dihydrogen phosphate can alleviate the adverse effects of salt stress on sunflower. J Plant Nutr. 2011;34:1041–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Jamil M, Rehman S, Rha ES. Salinity effect on plant growth, PSII photochemistry and chlorophyll content in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) and cabbage (Brassica oleracea capitata L.). Pak J Bot. 2007;39:753–60.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Kumar S, Li G, Yang J, Huang X, Ji Q, Liu Z, et al. Effect of salt stress on growth, physiological parameters, and ionic concentration of water dropwort (Oenanthe javanica) cultivars. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:660409.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Gomes MA da C, Pestana IA, Santa-Catarina C, Hauser-Davis RA, Suzuki MS. Salinity effects on photosynthetic pigments, proline, biomass and nitric oxide in salvinia auriculata Aubl. Acta Limnol Bras. 2017;29:1–13.

  61. Upadhyay RK, Panda SK. Salt tolerance of two aquatic macrophytes, Pistia stratiotes and Salvinia molesta. Biol Plant. 2005;49:157–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Greenway H, Munns R, Wolfe JOE. Interactions between growth, Cl− and Na+ uptake, and water relations of plants in saline environments. I. Slightly vacuolated cells. Plant Cell Environ. 1983;6:567–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Tian Y, Zhang H-c, Fang S-z, Ding Y-x. Distribution of K^+, Na^+, Ca^ 2^+ and Mg^ 2^+ in poplar rhizosphere system under NaCl stress. J Plant Resour Environ. 2003;12:11–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Silva EN, Silveira JAG, Rodrigues CRF, Viégas RA. Physiological adjustment to salt stress in J atropha curcas is associated with accumulation of salt ions, transport and selectivity of K+, osmotic adjustment and K+/N a+ homeostasis. Plant Biol. 2015;17:1023–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Sarker U, Oba S. The response of salinity stress-induced A. tricolor to growth, anatomy, physiology, non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidants. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:1354.

  66. Ashrafi E, Razmjoo J, Zahedi M. Effect of salt stress on growth and ion accumulation of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cultivars. J Plant Nutr. 2018;41:818–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Hamamoto S, Horie T, Hauser F, Deinlein U, Schroeder JI, Uozumi N. HKT transporters mediate salt stress resistance in plants: from structure and function to the field. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2015;32:113–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Shabala S, Pottosin I. Regulation of potassium transport in plants under hostile conditions: implications for abiotic and biotic stress tolerance. Physiol Plant. 2014;151:257–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Demidchik V, Straltsova D, Medvedev SS, Pozhvanov GA, Sokolik A, Yurin V. Stress-induced electrolyte leakage: the role of K+-permeable channels and involvement in programmed cell death and metabolic adjustment. J Exp Bot. 2014;65:1259–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Falhof J, Pedersen JT, Fuglsang AT, Palmgren M. Plasma membrane H+-ATPase regulation in the center of plant physiology. Mol Plant. 2016;9:323–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Janicka-Russak M, Kabała K. The role of plasma membrane H+-ATPase in salinity stress of plants. In: Progress in Botany. Springer Cham; 2015. p. 77–92.

  72. Arndt SK, Arampatsis C, Foetzki A, Li X, Zeng F, Zhang X. Contrasting patterns of leaf solute accumulation and salt adaptation in four phreatophytic desert plants in a hyperarid desert with saline groundwater. J Arid Environ. 2004;59:259–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Menezes RV, de AzevedoNeto AD, Ribeiro M de O, Cova AMW. Crescimento e teores de solutos orgânicos e inorgânicos em amaranto sob estresse salino. Pesqui Agropecu Trop. 2017;47:22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Qihong J. A study on the characters of content and distribution of K, Na, Ca, Mg elements in Alhagi sparsifolia. Acta Phytoecological Sinica. 1996;20:80–4.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Tester M, Davenport R. Na+ tolerance and Na+ transport in higher plants. Ann Bot. 2003;91:503–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Miller GAD, Suzuki N, Ciftci-Yilmaz S, Mittler RON. Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ. 2010;33:453–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Mangano S, Juárez SPD, Estevez JM. ROS regulation of polar growth in plant cells. Plant Physiol. 2016;171:1593–605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Mhamdi A, Van Breusegem F. Reactive oxygen species in plant development. Development. 2018;145:dev164376.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Ali Q, Daud MK, Haider MZ, Ali S, Rizwan M, Aslam N, et al. Seed priming by sodium nitroprusside improves salt tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by enhancing physiological and biochemical parameters. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017;119:50–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Polash MAS, Sakil MA, Hossain MA. Plants responses and their physiological and biochemical defense mechanisms against salinity: a review. Trop Plant Res. 2019;6:250–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Hancock RE, Sahl H-G. Antimicrobial and host-defense peptides as new anti-infective therapeutic strategies. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:1551–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Jalali-e-Emam SMS, Alizadeh B, Zaefizadeh M, Zakarya RA, Khayatnezhad M. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in NaCl stress in salt-sensitive and salt-tolerance genotypes of Colza (Brassica napus L.). Middle East J Sci Res. 2011;7:7–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Abogadallah GM, Serag MM, Quick WP. Fine and coarse regulation of reactive oxygen species in the salt tolerant mutants of barnyard grass and their wild-type parents under salt stress. Physiol Plant. 2010;138:60–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Verdoy D, Coba de la Peña T, Redondo FJ, Lucas MM, Pueyo JJ. Transgenic Medicago truncatula plants that accumulate proline display nitrogen-fixing activity with enhanced tolerance to osmotic stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2006;29:1913–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Ahmad P, Abdel Latef AA, Hashem A, Abd_Allah EF, Gucel S, Tran L-SP. Nitric oxide mitigates salt stress by regulating levels of osmolytes and antioxidant enzymes in chickpea. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:347.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Abdel Latef AAH, Srivastava AK, El-sadek MSA, Kordrostami M, Tran L-SP. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles improve growth and enhance tolerance of broad bean plants under saline soil conditions. Land Degrad Dev. 2018;29:1065–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Streb S, Zeeman SC. Starch metabolism in Arabidopsis. The Arabidopsis book/American Society of Plant Biologists. 2012;10:e0160.

  88. Qados AMA. Effect of salt stress on plant growth and metabolism of bean plant Vicia faba (L.). J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2011;10:7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Sarker U, Islam MT, Oba S. Salinity stress accelerates nutrients, dietary fiber, minerals, phytochemicals and antioxidant activity in Amaranthus tricolor leaves. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0206388.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Läuchli A, Lüttge U. Salinity: Environment-plants-molecules. Dordrecht, The Netherlands:: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Springer; 2002. p. 229–248.

  91. Queiroz HM, Sodek L, Haddad CRB. Effect of salt on the growth and metabolism of Glycine max. Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2012;55:809–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Shao QS, Shu S, Du J, Xing WW, Guo SR, Sun J. Effects of NaCl stress on nitrogen metabolism of cucumber seedlings. Russ J Plant Physiol. 2015;62:595–603.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Thevs N, Zerbe S, Schnittler M, Abdusalih N, Succow M. Structure, reproduction and flood-induced dynamics of riparian Tugai forests at the Tarim River in Xinjiang. NW China Forestry. 2008;81:45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Forde BG, Lea PJ. Glutamate in plants: metabolism, regulation, and signalling. J Exp Bot. 2007;58:2339–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Lichtenthaler HK, Wellburn AR. Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem Soc Trans. 1983;11:591–2.

  96. Patterson BD, MacRae EA, Ferguson IB. Estimation of hydrogen peroxide in plant extracts using titanium (IV). Anal Biochem. 1984;139:487–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Heath RL, Packer L. Effect of light on lipid peroxidation in chloroplasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1965;19:716–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Giannopolitis CN, Ries SK. Superoxide dismutases: I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol. 1977;59:309–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Jiang Z, Pulkkinen M, Wang Y, Lampi A-M, Stoddard FL, Salovaara H, et al. Faba bean flavour and technological property improvement by thermal pre-treatments. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2016;68:295–305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Sessa DJ, Anderson RL. Soybean peroxidases: purification and some properties. J Agric Food Chem. 1981;29:960–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Sabra A, Daayf F, Renault S. Differential physiological and biochemical responses of three Echinacea species to salinity stress. Sci Hortic. 2012;135:23–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Liu C, Wang Y, Pan K, Zhu T, Li W, Zhang L. Carbon and nitrogen metabolism in leaves and roots of dwarf bamboo (Fargesia denudata Yi) subjected to drought for two consecutive years during sprouting period. J Plant Growth Regul. 2014;33:243–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Sánchez-Rodríguez E, del Mar R-W, Ríos JJ, Blasco B, Rosales MÁ, Melgarejo R, et al. Ammonia production and assimilation: its importance as a tolerance mechanism during moderate water deficit in tomato plants. J Plant Physiol. 2011;168:816–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Rachim MA, Nicholas DJD. Glutamine synthetase and glutamate synthase from Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Phytochemistry. 1985;24:2541–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Quentin AG, Rodemann T, Doutreleau M-F, Moreau M, Davies NW, Millard P. Application of near-infrared spectroscopy for estimation of non-structural carbohydrates in foliar samples of Eucalyptus globulus Labilladière. Tree Physiol. 2017;37:131–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Hansen J, Møller IB. Percolation of starch and soluble carbohydrates from plant tissue for quantitative determination with anthrone. Anal Biochem. 1975;68:87–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil. 1973;39:205–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Tang ZC. Experimental Guide of Modern Plant Physiology,” Beijing. Science Press. 1999;95:1–425.

  110. Yousfi S, Serret MD, Voltas J, Araus JL. Effect of salinity and water stress during the reproductive stage on growth, ion concentrations, Δ13C, and δ15N of durum wheat and related amphiploids. J Exp Bot. 2010;61:3529–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the departmental colleagues for their help during data collection and laboratory analysis and would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41977050); the Key Program of Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the Government of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China (Nos. U1903102). This research was further supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, China (QN2022045005); the President’s International Fellowship Initiative (PIFI), and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2022VBA0024, 2021VBA0001). JP and JS acknowledge the financial support from the Catalan Government grant SGR 2017–1005, the Spanish Government grants PID2019-110521 GB-I00, and the Fundación Ramón Areces grant CIVP20A6621.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Desert Plant Roots Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi, China

    Abd Ullah, Akash Tariq, Fanjiang Zeng, Xutian Chai & Zhihao Zhang

  2. State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi, China

    Abd Ullah, Akash Tariq, Fanjiang Zeng, Xutian Chai & Zhihao Zhang

  3. Cele National Station of Observation and Research for Desert-Grassland Ecosystems, Cele, 848300, China

    Abd Ullah, Akash Tariq, Fanjiang Zeng, Xutian Chai & Zhihao Zhang

  4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Abd Ullah, Akash Tariq, Fanjiang Zeng, Xutian Chai & Zhihao Zhang

  5. CSIC, Global Ecology Unit, CREAF-CSIC-UAB, Bellaterra, 08193, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

    Jordi Sardans & Josep Peñuelas

  6. CREAF, 08193, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia, Spain

    Jordi Sardans & Josep Peñuelas

  7. Instituto de Fisiología Vegetal, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas Y Técnicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Corina Graciano

  8. Department of Biological Resources, Agricultural Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, ELKH, Martonvásár, Hungary

    Muhammad Ahsan Asghar

  9. Chengdu Institute of Biology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Ali Raza

  10. State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, Institute of Arid Agroecology, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China

    You-Cai Xiong

Authors
  1. Abd Ullah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Akash Tariq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jordi Sardans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Josep Peñuelas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fanjiang Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Corina Graciano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Muhammad Ahsan Asghar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ali Raza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. You-Cai Xiong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xutian Chai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Zhihao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FZ and AT designed this research project, AU, XC, ZZ, conducted and performed the experiments, AU, AT, JS, CG, MAA, and XY analysed the data, AU, AT, JS, JP, and FZ wrote the manuscript, AU, AT, JS, JP, AR, CG, and FZ revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Akash Tariq or Fanjiang Zeng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The specimen was identified by Prof. Dr. Fanjiang Zeng and preserved in the herbarium of Cele National Station of Observation and Research for Desert-Grassland Ecosystem, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences under the accession number (CNRS1985). Permission and license were obtained to collect specimens and all the methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ullah, A., Tariq, A., Sardans, J. et al. Alhagi sparsifolia acclimatizes to saline stress by regulating its osmotic, antioxidant, and nitrogen assimilation potential. BMC Plant Biol 22, 453 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03832-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03832-1

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us