Skip to main content
Download PDF

Physiological and agronomical evaluation of elite rice varieties for adaptation to heat stress

BMC Plant Biology volume 22, Article number: 236 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The increasing temperatures due to climate change around the world poses a serious threat to sustainable crop production. The growing adverse effects of heat stress are putting global food security at great risk. Crop improvement for adaptation to increased temperatures is therefore of paramount importance. This study aims at assessing the effects of heat stress in relation to agro-morphological and physiological traits of six rice varieties. The study was carried out in the Township of Glazoué, a rice-growing area in Benin. The experiments were laid in randomized complete block design with three replications. Two types of stress were imposed: high-temperature stress in the dry season and optimal temperatures in the rainy season. The calculated mean values of morphological, physiological, and agronomic traits were used to estimate heritability, genetic advance, PCA, and correlation.

Results

The results showed that heat stress had a significant (p ≤ 0.01) influence on plant height, leaf length, number of tillers, number of internodes, days to flowering, and days to maturity, 1000-seed weight, and yield per plant. The heat stress had significantly delayed the flowering of all the varieties when compared to the controls. The highest values of 1000-seed weight (34. 67 g) were recorded for BRIZ-8B while the lowest (25.33 g) were recorded for NERICA-L20. The highest values for the genotypic coefficient of variation (43.05%) and phenotypic coefficient of variation (99.13%) were recorded for yield per plant under heat stress. The topmost broad-sense heritability was recorded for grain width (92.72%), followed by days to maturity (69.33%), days to flowering (68.50%), number of grains per panicle (57.35%), and yield (54.55%).

Conclusions

These results showed that BRIZ-8B and BRIZ-10B were the most tolerant to high temperature amongst the six varieties assessed and potentially could be recommended to farmers for production under high temperature and be used in breeding programs to improve heat tolerance in rice.

Peer Review reports

Background

Rice is among the most consumed staple foods in the world with a total production of 778.6 million tons in 2018 [1]. Globally, the trend of rice consumption is sharply increasing in parallel with global population growth, especially in Africa and Asia where a large proportion of the population generally rely on rice as a daily source of calories [2]. Thus, massive intensification of rice cultivation is needed to ensure global food security. In Africa, rice has become a strategic food because of its contribution to household food security and its impact on national economies [3]. Like most African countries, Benin is faced with changing dietary habits characterized by the increase in rice consumption, which was once considered as a festive food [4]. Consequently, the consumption needs of rice have significantly increased and the national demand for rice was evaluated at 376560 tons in 2015 [5]. Despite the increase in national production from 200,000 tons in 2013 to 459,313 tons in 2018 [1], the production still does not meet the growing demand of the population. The increase in production is related to both yield and harvested area with an annual production growth rate of 3.06 and 8.37%, in 2013 and 2018, respectively [1].

Benin has a large amount of cultivable land for rice production with 205,000 ha of available wetlands [6]. However, it should be noted that the average yield (3 t/ha) is still lower than the world average yield (4 t/ha) [7]. The upshot of all this is that not only the yield is low, but also most of the available lands are not used for rice production. Several organizational, biotic, and abiotic constraints underly this observation. Most of the abiotic stresses are related to soil salinity [8, 9] drought [10], and heat stress [11]. Also, the result of surveys conducted by the AfricaRice in the 12 sub-Saharan African countries showed that drought and climate change effects cause yield losses up to 33% [12].

Rice production has also been intensified in lowland and dryland (upland) rained cropping systems, many of which are threatened by drought and high temperatures [13]. In addition, global climate change is likely to aggravate the current vulnerability of cropping to climate, with a projected increase in global average surface temperature of 1.4–5.8 °C by 2100 and the potential for increased variability in this average [14]. High temperature is generally referred to as an increase in temperature above a threshold for a spell that causes irremediable destruction to crops during growth and development [15]. Temperature increase caused by climate variation affects rice production. Previous studies have shown that the flowering stage and to a lesser extent grain filling are the most susceptible developmental stages of rice to high temperatures [16,17,18]. When rice is subjected to air temperatures above 35 °C, heat injury occurs and two developmental stages are distinguished as the most sensitive to high temperatures; these include the time of flowering and the interval about 9 days before flowering [19]. The projected temperature increase of 2–4 °C by the end of the 21e century [20], poses a threat to rice production. Rice yields under these conditions will be very low, mostly below average, because farmers continue to grow heat sensitive varieties; this is justified by the non-existence of modern high-yielding varieties that are tolerant to heat stress. Controlling high temperatures is a real bottleneck in rice production in Benin. Breeding for heat tolerance has been identified as a cost-efficient option to cope with heat stress [17, 21]. This requires prior knowledge on the heat tolerance status of available germplasm collection. However, in Benin, no information is available on heat-stress-tolerant rice varieties that could be used under local conditions.

This study aims at screening and identifying heat tolerant rice varieties in Benin based on agro-morphological and physiological parameters.

Materials and methods

Study area

The study was carried out in the Township of Glazoué, located between 2°14′ East longitude and 7°58′ north. The average annual rainfall ranged from 959.56 mm to 1255.5 mm with a peak in July. Figure 1 shows the Township of Glazoué and the location of the experimental site.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Location of the experimental site

Full size image

Plant material

A total of six varieties from the cultivated rice species Oryza sativa (IR841) and 05 interspecific varieties (BRIZ-8B, BRIZ-9B, BRIZ-10B) constituted the plant material used (Table 1). They were obtained from the National Agricultural Research Institute of Benin (INRAB). The collection of the rice varieties used in this study complied with institutional, national and international guidelines and legislation.

Table 1 Characteristics of plant materials used in this study
Full size table

Experimental design

The study was conducted in a randomized complete block design with 3 replicates and six varieties. Two experiments were conducted. The first experiment was carried out from February to June 2020, the periods of high temperatures in the study area but it should be noted that after flowering the rains began and the temperatures became optimal, which favored the plant recovery and productivity. The second experiment, considered as a control, was conducted from July to November 2020, which is the optimal rice growing season in the study area. Two factors, namely varieties and temperatures were studied.

Plant management

The seeds were sown and raised in plastic trays for 21 days, and the seedlings were transplanted in rows with two plants per hole according to the pre-established randomization plan. Each variety was planted in 7 rows per plot with an inter-row and intra-row spacing of 25 cm. The data were collected from plants on the 5 rows in the middle while the 2 other rows served as border rows. At vegetative stage, fertilizers were applied at the rate of 100 kg/ha for NPK and 50 kg/ha for Urea. Manual weeding was done to keep the field free of weeds.

Data collection

Daily temperature data of the experimental sites were recorded during the two trials. The growth parameters measured were: plant height, plant diameter at the base point of the stem or tiller, leaf length, and width, number of tillers, number of internodes, internode length, panicle leaf length and width, and plant vigor. These measurements were made on 9 plants per plot. The yield parameters measured included length and width of rice grains, panicle length, number of primary and secondary branches, the average number of empty and full grains per panicle, and weight of 1000 rice grains. Yield-related data were measured on ten selected panicles per plot at harvest.

Physiological data were collected using chlorophyll fluorescence meter (OS30p Opti-Sciences) from fully expanded leaflets clipped from the upper part of the plant canopy, after a 1-h dark adaptation period. Dark fluorescence (Fo), maximal fluorescence (Fm), and photochemical yield (Fv / Fm, where Fv = Fm - Fo) were recorded.

Data analysis

The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out for all the quantitative data to check whether the factors or their interaction had a significant effect on the parameters. The analysis was performed using R version 4.0.3 (R Core Team, 2021). The means under optimal and high temperatures were compared using Boxplots. The significance level for statistical analysis was set at 5%. The results of the analysis of variance were used to estimate the variance component to calculate the genetic parameters (Table 2).

Table 2 Formulas for the different genetic parameters estimated
Full size table

The Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to study the correlations between the variables of growth and physiological parameters, and yields and yield components on the different axes which summarized more than half of the information, PCA was also carried out to identify the main features contributing to the variability observed between the varieties. The descriptive statistics highlighting the means of the homogeneous classes served to determine the traits of discrimination of the different groups of varieties generated by the dendrogram. The results of the analysis of variance made it possible to calculate the genetic parameters (Table 2).

Results

Variation in temperature during the trials

The maximum temperatures recorded for 90 days during both trials using the Google Weather application are presented in Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table. During the heat stress season, the temperatures ranged from 36 °C to 39 °C degrees. The highest daily maximum temperature under heat stress condition (39 °C) was recorded in March during the tillering stage The average maximum temperatures under heat stress during the flowering stage was 35 °C under heat stress conditions. The average relative humidity during heat stress was 40%.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Temperature variation in normal condition and under heat stress

Full size image

Effect of temperature on growth traits

Analysis of the variance (Table 3) revealed that the variety had a significant effect on plant height and leaf length at 30 days after transplanting and on leaf length at 56 days after transplanting (P ≤ 0.0001), panicle leaf length (P ≤ 0.001), plant height at 56 days after transplanting and panicle leaf width (P ≤ 0.01).

Table 3 Significance of plant growth variables
Full size table

Temperature had significant influence on plant height and plant diameter at the base point of tiller at 30 days after transplanting, number of tillers at 30 and 56 days after transplanting, number of internodes at 30 days after transplanting, internode length at 30 and 56 days after transplanting, and plant vigor at 30 days after transplanting (P ≤ 0.0001), plant height at 56 days after transplanting and panicle leaf width (P ≤ 0.001) (Table 3).

The temperature by variety interaction had a significant effect (P < 0.01) on plant height at 30 days, leaf length 56 days after transplanting, and internode length measured at 30 days after transplanting (Table 3).

Effect of temperature on yield traits

The analysis of the variance (Table 4) showed that the variety had a very highly significant effect (P ≤ 0.0001) on the days to 1% flowering, the days to 50% flowering, the days to maturity of grains, the width of grains, the weight of 1000 grains and the average yield per plant. We observed a significant effect (P ≤ 0.01) of variety on length of panicles, average number of filled grains and the yield per plant (Table 4).

Table 4 Analysis of variance of yield and yield components
Full size table

The analysis of variance (Table 4) showed that the temperature had a significant effect (P ≤ 0.0001) on days to 1% flowering, the days to 50% flowering, the days to maturity of grains, number of secondary branches, and the weight of 1000G.

Variety by temperature interaction had a significant influence (P ≤ 0.01) on the days to 50% flowering date, days to grain maturity, number of secondary branches number, and 1000G weight.

Effect of temperature on physiological traits

The analysis of variance (Table 5) showed that variety had a significant influence only on the initial value of fluorescence taken at 30 days after transplanting.

Table 5 Significance of physiological variables
Full size table

Similarly, temperature had a highly significant influence (P ≤ 0.001) on the ratio of variable to initial fluorescence (Fv/Fo) taken at 40 days after transplanting. Temperature had a significant effect (P ≤ 0.01) on the initial fluorescence value (Fo) at 30 days after transplanting and the variable fluorescence (Fv) at 40 days after transplanting. In contrast, temperature had no effect on the rest of the physiological parameters.

The interaction between variety and temperature had no effect on the physiological traits. It is therefore concluded that no physiological variable explained the influence of temperature on the varieties.

Comparison of varieties under the two environmental conditions

The variety with the highest plant height under normal conditions (73.96 cm) and heat stress (60.80 cm) was BRIZ-8B (Fig. 3a). BRIZ-9B had the shortest plant height under both optimal and heat stress conditions.

Fig. 3
figure 3

a Boxplots of plant height under normal condition (left) and heat stress (right). b Boxplots of leaf length under normal condition (left) and heat stress (right). c Boxplots of internode length under normal condition (left) and heat stress (right). d Boxplots of flowering date under normal condition (left) and heat stress (right). e Boxplots of the maturity grain date under normal condition (left) and heat stress (right). f Boxplots of the number of secondary panicles. g Boxplots of the weight of thousand grains

Full size image

Under optimal conditions and heat stress, BRIZ-8B recorded the longest leaves at 56 days after transplanting (Fig. 3b).

Under normal temperature regimes and heat stress, NERICA-L14 and NERICA-L20 had the highest averages of internode length at 30 days (Fig. 3c).

Under optimal conditions, NERICA-L20, NERICA-L14, IR841, BERIZ-9B, and BRIZ-8B had the longest days from sowing date to 50% flowering with an average of 98 days, 97 days, 97 days, and 94 days, respectively. While under heat stress, IR841, NERICA-L20 and NERICA- L14 flowered late (115 days, 115 days, 114 days, respectively). BERIZ-10B had the shortest number of days to 50% flowering under both optimal and heat stress conditions.

Under heat stress, it is observed that NERICA-L20, NERICA-L14, and IR841 matured late at 142 days, 141 days, and 137 days, respectively (Fig. 3e). Under optimal and heat stress conditions, BRIZ-9B showed the shortest days to grain maturity (100 days) (Fig. 3e). Regardless of the conditions, IR841 had the highest variability in days to maturity. Overall, the varieties exhibited higher variation and took longer to mature under heat stress compared to normal conditions (Fig. 3e).

Under optimal conditions, NERICA-L20 had the highest number of secondary branches (30.00), followed by NERICA-L14 (29.00) and BERIZ-8B (27.33). The variety IR841 had the lowest number of secondary branches under optimal conditions with an average of 23.66; while under heat stress the variety BERIZ-8B recorded a low number of secondary branches (12.00).

Under optimal temperature and heat stress conditions, two varieties BERIZ-8B and BERIZ-9B had the highest weight of 1000 grains. Under optimal conditions, BERIZ-8B and BERIZ-9B recorded 37.44 g and 36.78 g, respectively while under heat stress, they recorded 34.67 g and 32.41 g, respectively.

The hierarchical ascending classification (HAC) of rice varieties under both temperature conditions

HAC was used to assess the similarity and dissimilarity between the varieties based on agro-morphological, phenological and physiological data collected. A dendrogram was thus generated according for each type of temperature regime.

Relationship between the varieties under optimal condition

The varieties were clustered into two classes and each cluster is made up of three varieties (Fig. 4). The first group consisted of BRIZ-8B NERICA-L14 and NERICA-L20 while the second group included BRIZ-10B, BRIZ-9B and IR841. Group 1 had the tallest plants, the biggest diameter at the base point of the stem or tiller, the longest and largest leaves, best vigorous plants, the longest internode, longest panicle, highest number of secondary branches, the highest days to maturity and the highest average yields per plant. The variety in group 2 longest grain. Finally, class 3 had varieties with a considerable number of tillers and internodes, longest flowering dates, and highest thousand grain weight compared to the other classes.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Clustering of the varieties under normal condition

Full size image

Relationship between the varieties under heat stress

The clustering analysis grouped the varieties into three classes (Fig. 5). Class 1 consists of two varieties BRIZ-10B and BRIZ -8B. Class 2 is also made up of two varieties BRIZ-9B and IR841. Finally, the last class is constituted by the varieties NERICA-L14 and NERICA-L20. Individuals in class 1 showed the tallest plants, longest leaf, leaf width at 56 days after transplanting, biggest diameter at the base point of the stem or tiller, longest internode, the highest number of internodes, best vigorous plants, longest panicle leaf width, the shortest days to 50% flowering, the lowest Fo30, and Fm30, the highest Fv/Fm at 40 days and as well as the highest weight of 1000 grains. The varieties of class 2 had the shortest plant height, the largest number of tillers and internodes, the shortest panicle length, the highest values of initial and variable fluorescence, the highest ratio between the initial and variable fluorescence. As for the varieties in class 3 they had the smallest diameter at 30 days after transplanting and number of internode at 30 days, the lowest number of tillers at 30 days, longest panicle leaves, highest value of initial fluorescence, longest panicles, highest number of secondary branches, longest days to 50% flowering and maturity, and longest grains with the highest yields per plant.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Clustering of the varieties under heat stress

Full size image

Estimation of genetic parameters

Phenotypic and genotypic variation

Phenotypic variance was greater than genotypic variance for all variables under both normal and heat stress conditions. Phenotypic variance ranged from 0.03 to 297.30 under optimal conditions and from 0.01 to 193.30 under heat stress. The plant height at 56 days after transplanting (297.30 optimal conditions and 193.30 under stress) shows the highest phenotypic variance. This variance is followed by panicle leaf length (99.77 under optimal and 72.77 under stress), leaf length at 56 days (70.29 under stress), and grain maturity date (61.27 optimal conditions). Similarly, genotypic variance ranged from 0.07 to 165 under optimal conditions and from 0.01 to 166.36 under heat stress. The traits with the highest genotypic variances were plant height at 56 days (165.03 optimal and 166.36 under stress), length of panicle leaves (85.67 optimal), days to 1% flowering (75, 26 under stress), and grain maturity date (55, 29 optimal).

Coefficient of phenotypic and genotypic variation

For all the traits, the coefficient of phenotypic variation was higher than the coefficient of genotypic variation irrespective of the season (Tables 6 and 7). Under optimal temperature conditions, the number of tillers at 56 days, the length of panicle leaves (23.86%), the average number of full grains (28.43%), the average number of empty grains (55.05%), the average yield per plant (25.62%), and the yield per plot (46.40%) had the highest phenotypic variation coefficients. Under heat stress conditions, plant height at 30 days and 56 days (20.18%), diameter at the base point of the stem or tiller measured at 56 days (30.51%), number of internodes at 30 days (23.80%) and 56 days (27.85%), the length of internodes at 30 days (21.02%), the length of panicle leaves (23, 79%), number of panicles (25.39%), number of secondary branches (24.87%), the average number of empty grains (54.01%), average yield per plant (99.13%), yield per plot (46.40%) which had the highest phenotypic variation coefficient. The characters with moderate phenotypic variation coefficient under optimal conditions are plant height, leaf length measured at 30 days and 56 days after transplanting, number of tillers at 56 days, plant vigor at 30 days, panicle leaf length, thousand seed weight, and average yield per plant. Under heat stress, leaf length at 30 and 56 days, leaf width, diameter at 30 days, number of tillers, number of primary branches, and average number of filled grains had moderate phenotypic variation coefficients. On the other hand, the coefficients of low genotypic variation in optimal conditions are for leaf length at 56 days (9.52%), number of tillers at 30 days (7.85%), number of internodes, number of panicles (1, 98%), panicle length (3.91%), number of primary (2.67%) and secondary branches (7.64), kernel length (5.92%) and kernel width (2.45%), days to 50% flowering (6.94), and days to seed maturity (6.29%). While under heat stress the characters with the lowest genotypic coefficient of variation were leaf width at 56 days (7.97%), diameter at 30 days (6.42), number of tillers at 30 days and 56 days, internode length (8.99), panicle length (7.77), panicle length (7.35%), maturity date (6.29%). Under optimal temperature conditions, panicle leaf length (22.5%), average number of filled (22.73%) and empty grain (30.24), yield per plot (31.85%), had the highest genotypic variation coefficient. While under heat stress, diameter at 56 days (28.75), number of tillers at 30 (20.28) and 56 days (20.76), the length of internodes (24.51%), the average number of empty grain (41.56%), the average yield per plant (40.05%) and the yield per plot (36.54%) are those with the highest genotypic coefficient of variation.

Table 6 Genetic parameters of growth variables
Full size table
Table 7 Genetic parameters of performance variables
Full size table

Broad sense heritability of the traits

Under normal temperature conditions, the variables with the highest heritability were leaf length at 56 days (97.98%), thousand grain weight (95.11%), and days to 50% flowering (90.66%) panicle leaf length (85.89%), grain maturity date (85.34%), leaf length at 30 days (84.21%), days to 1% flowering (83.34), plant height at 30 days (78.98%), and panicle length (73.17%) (Tables 6 and 7). Under heat stress, heritability was higher for the following traits: plant diameter at the base point of the stem or tiller (88.79%), leaf length at 56 days (87.04%), plant height at 56 days (86.06%), height at 30 days (72.55%), number of internodes at 56 days (70.00%), days to 50% flowering (69.33%), days to 1% flowering (68.50%).

Discussion

Growth parameters under heat stress

The results of the analysis of variance showed that the temperature regimes and the variety influenced plant height 30 days after transplanting, the length of the plant, and the length of internodes 56 days after transplanting. The tallest plants under optimal conditions of temperatures and heat stress are BRIZ-8B, NERICA-L14, and NERICA-L20. In fact, these varieties are all interspecific. BRIZ-8B is obtained by crossing a line of TOG5681 with IR64. NERICA-L14 and NERICA-L20 are interspecific with O. glaberrima and O. sativa [22]. According to [23] the O. glaberrima and TOG5681 lines are identified as tolerant to heat stress based on plant size and chlorophyll content. BRIZ-9B was more sensitive to heat stress due to its short plant height observed under both temperature conditions. This is consistent with the work of [24, 25] who demonstrated that high temperature influenced negatively the growth parameters of rice plants. At the same time, BRIZ-10B shows lower height variation when subjected to both temperature conditions. The longest leaves observed in BRIZ-8B under heat stress shows the level of tolerance of this variety to high temperature. The shortest leaves were observed in BRIZ-9B indicating its sensibility to heat stress [26]. showed that an increase in temperature can decrease the rate of seed germination, as well as cause growth inhibition and early senescence of leaves. A temperature higher than 36 °C was observed during the growth phase of heat-stressed plants. It can therefore be stated that this increase in temperature above 36 °C during the growth phase would have had negative effects on the various growth parameters measured. This confirms the results of [27] who showed that temperatures above 32 °C negatively affect all stages of growth and development of rice plants.

Effect of heat stress on yields and yield attributes

The results showed that temperature affected rice yield and its components, notably the days to flowering, days to grain maturity, number of secondary branches, the weight of a thousand grains, and the number of empty grains per panicle.

Heat stress affects the days to flowering of different rice varieties. The shortest day to flowering date was observed in the variety BRIZ-10B, under both optimal and heat stress conditions. We observed that there was an increase in days to flowering under heat stress compared to the optimal temperature condition for all the varieties studied, which is in line with previous results [20, 28]. Under heat stress, during flowering a temperature above 36 °C is recorded. This increase in temperature is therefore responsible for the prolonged days to flowering observed in all varieties. This confirms the results of [11] who showed that above 33 °C, the flowering time of rice plants is delayed. High temperature leads to the modification of days to flowering of rice plants, subsequently causing sterility of spikelet [29]. Flowering (anthers and fertilization) is the most sensitive developmental stage to high temperature in rice [19] and this was observed in the different varieties used in the present study. Variability in flowering and grain maturity dates were much more observed in IR841, NERICA-L14, and NERICA-L20. The Lowest variation was noticed in BRIZ-10B and BRIZ -8B. It indicates that these two varieties BRIZ-10B and BRIZ-8B are tolerant to high temperatures based on days to flowering and grain maturity.

The high temperatures also influenced the thousand grain weight of the different rice varieties. Low thousand grain weights of the varieties were observed under heat stress compared to those obtained at normal temperature. Under high temperature, the post-harvest weight of rice grains decreases considerably [30]. Under heat stress, BRIZ-10B recorded the lowest thousand grain weight. At the same time, BRIZ-8B and NERICA-L14 showed the highest thousand grain weights. Our results are in agreement with [25, 31, 32]. Due to heat stress during the period of maturity, rice grain filling was affected [33]. High temperatures of more than 32 °C during flowering result in reduced grain yield [18]. Heat stress at the onset of the flowering stage reduced the thousand grain weight of rice. The probable reason could be due to pollen sterility or inhibition and the growth of spikelet or poor grain filling [34]. The weight of thousand grains is mainly determined by the development of the integument and endosperm [34]. In adverse environments, such as high temperature, hull size, and grain weight decreased due to abnormal spikelet development [34]. In addition, the growth and development of the rice plant are also influenced by the high temperature at the initial stage of reproduction, which can have negative effects on grain filling [34]. Therefore, this explains the low thousand-grain weights in different varieties under heat stress.

The early rainfall that occurred after 50% flowering was beneficial to the recovery of plants from heat stress. However, the activity of heat stress at the time of grain filling is at the origin of the loss of weight obtained at the end compared to that obtained in optimal conditions.

There was a negative correlation between the high temperature and days to flowering, the weight of thousand grains. The correlation on these variables also confirms the effect of heat stress on flowering and yield. These results corroborate the work of [35] who showed that heat stress affects reproductive development and grain yield of rice.

Effect of heat stress on chlorophyll fluorescence

The results showed that heat stress had no significant influence on the physiological parameters studied. This is contrary to the work of [36, 37] who indicated that drought-induced heat stress influences the physiological mechanisms of rice plants. The very low influence of heat stress on the physiology of rice plants observed could be explained by the non-destruction of the photosynthetic apparatus of the 6 varieties by the long-term mild heat recorded during the trial. This allowed the production and distribution of biomass, especially in the reproductive organs, thus contributing to the different yields obtained. However, the work deserves to be deepened at this level in order to evaluate the capacity of physiological adaptation of these various varieties under conditions of heat stress.

The current study has shown that there could be a combination of plant height, flowering date, and thousand seed weight and heat stress tolerance for some varieties (BRIZ-8B, NERCA-L14, and N BRIZ-10B). The varieties BRIZ-8B, NERICA-L14, and BRIZ-10B developed some mechanisms of tolerance to high temperature, since these varieties demonstrated the highest weight of thousand grains compared to those of the other varieties. In addition, they showed fewer empty spikelets compared to the other varieties.

The results of ANOVA also showed that temperature regime and variety factor significantly affected the number of secondary branches and the maturity date of grains.

PCA results showed that the highest thousand seed weight was associated with higher yield per plant and plot and that a variety with high thousand seed weight under heat stress or normal temperature indicated the highest yield per plant or plot. This is because good grain filling at the time of heat stress resulted in good yield [34].

Genetic variability

Genetic parameters show that genotypic variation is lower than phenotypic variation in all traits except for height, grain length, and thousand seed weights under heat stress. These results are in agreement with [38]. Low genotypic and phenotypic variance reflects low impact of environmental factors on trait expression; while high variance shows the impact of environmental factors on traits. This finding is consistent with previous reports on rice [39]. According to [40], the coefficients of phenotypic variation are low below 11%, moderate between 11 and 20%, and high above 20%. The coefficient of phenotypic variation was higher than the coefficient of genotypic variation for all traits. But the significant difference in some characters such as height, diameter at the base point of the stem or tiller, number of thalli, length of panicle leaves, number of panicles, 1000 seed weight, average yield per plant, and per plot showed that these factors were influenced by the environment under heat stress. The highest PCV % and GCV % values will allow the improvement of genotypes for high temperature tolerance through selection for these desired traits. On the other hand, the lower values of PCV % and GCV % such as panicle length, grain length and width, flowering date, maturity date, indicate the lack of variability; which limits the improvement through the selection of these traits. Our results are in agreement with [41,42,43].

Low, medium and high values of broad heritability were obtained for the different traits. The low values under heat stress were for diameter at the base point of the stem or tiller, internode length, thallus number, panicle leaf length, panicle number, average number of filled grains per panicle and thousand grain weight, suggesting that it will be difficult to improve these traits. These results are in contrast with those obtained by [44,45,46] on rice, which can be explained here by the genetic and environmental difference. High heritability was observed with plant height, flowering date, internode length, panicle leaf width, number of primary branches and yield per plot; suggesting that these traits are highly heritable. The heritability value alone gives no indication of the amount of genetic advance that could result from the selection of the best individuals [47]. Expected genetic advance as a percentage of means revealed variable behavior of traits. In this study leaf length showed high heritability value coupled with a high genetic advance value indicating that genetic effects of additive type are important in determining this trait. The number of primary branches, flowering date and yield per plot showed high heritability coupled with a high genetic advance indicates the effective chance of selection of these traits for yield improvement. Our results are similar to [48,49,50].

Conclusion

In conclusion, the six varieties studied responded differently under heat stress conditions. Our results showed that the BRIZ-8B variety is the most tolerant variety to heat stress on the basis of the morphological and agronomic traits measured. Also, the variety BRIZ-10B is tolerant to heat stress based on yield traits. These varieties (BRIZ-8B, and BRIZ-10B) could serve as breeder’s starting material or recommended to farmers for cultivation under heat stress conditions. This study also revealed great morphological and agronomic variability in rice plants. It was noted that there is an influence of environmental factors on the expression of traits under heat stress, illustrated by a more or less large gap between the genotypic and phenotypic coefficients of variation and a high heritability in the broad sense for most of the traits studied.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

GV:

Genotypic Variance

PV:

Phenotypic Variance

H2 :

Heritability in the broad sense

GCV:

Coefficient of genotypic variation

PCV:

Coefficient of phenotypic variation

EG:

Expected genetic gain

HP30:

height at 30 days after transplanting (in cm)

HP56:

height at 56 days after transplanting (in cm)

Diat30:

diameter at 30 days after transplanting (in mm)

Diat56:

diameter at 56 days after transplanting (in mm)

LongF30:

leaf length at 30 days after transplanting (in cm)

LongF56:

leaf length at 56 days after transplanting (in cm)

NbT30:

number of tillers at 30 days after transplanting

NbT56:

number of tillers at 56 days after transplanting

NbEN30:

number of internodes at 30 days after transplanting

NbEN56:

number of internodes at 56 days after transplanting

LongEN30:

internode length at 30 days after transplanting (in cm)

LongEN56:

internode length at 56 days after transplanting (in cm)

LongFP:

panicle leaf length (in cm)

LargFP:

panicle leaf width (in cm)

NPa:

number of Panicle

LongPa:

panicle length

DatF1%:

date of flowering at 1% plant

DatF50%:

date of flowering at 50% plant

DatM:

date at grain maturity

LongG:

grain length (in mm)

LargG:

grain width (in mm)

NbRFP:

number of primary branching

NbRFS:

number of secondary ramification

NbMGP:

average number of full grains per panicle

NbMGV:

average number of empty grains per panicle

P1000G:

weight of thousand grains

RdmPlt:

average yield per rice plant (in kg/m2)

RdPa:

yield per plot (in t/ha)

Fo30:

Initial value of fluorescence after 30 days of transplanting

Fo40:

Initial value of fluorescence after 40 days of transplanting

Fm30:

Maximum value of fluorescence after 30 days of transplanting

Fm40:

Maximum value of fluorescence after 40 days of transplanting

Fv30:

Fluorescence to variable taken at 30 days after transplanting

(Fv/F0)30:

Ratio between variable and initial fluorescence taken at 30 days after transplanting

(Fv/F0)40:

Ratio between variable and initial fluorescence taken at 40 days after transplanting

(Fv/Fm) 30:

Ratio between variable and maximum fluorescence taken at 30 days after transplanting

References

  1. FAOSTAT. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#country/53. 2020.

  2. Permana H, Murata K, Kashiwagi M, Yamada T, & Kanekatsu M. Screening of Japanese rice cultivars for seeds with heat stress tolerance under hot water disinfection method. Asian J Plant Sci 2017;16(4): 211–220. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2017.211.220

  3. Diagne A, Alia DY, Wopereis MC, Saito K, Nakelse T, Seck PA. Impact of Rice research on income, poverty and food security in Africa: an ex-ante analysis. Realizing Africa's Rice Promise. 2013;390.

  4. Djogbede A Z, Hinvi L C, & Fiogbe ED. Effets de substitution des engrais chimiques par Azolla pinnata en riziculture au Nord Bénin,. Int J Biol Chem Sci 2012;6(6): 3027–3044. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v6i6.5.

  5. Ballaro G, SouléBG, & Gansari S. Analyse des impacts des politiques et stratégies mises en œuvre par l’Etat dans la filière riz depuis 2008. Cotonou: CCR-B and lares; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Worou ON. Experimental analysis and modelling of the rainfed rice cropping systems in West Africa., Ph. D. Thesis, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany. 2012;126p.

  7. Arouna A, & Diagne A. Impact de la production de semence riz sur le rendement et le revenu des ménages agricoles: une étude de cas du Bénin. 2013 ;25–26. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.160547.

  8. Ezin V, de la Peña R, Ahanchede A. Physiological and agronomical criteria for screening tomato genotypes for tolerance to salinity. Electron J Environ Agric Food Chem. 2010;9(10):1641–56.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sikirou M, Shittu A, Konaté K, Maji A, Ngaujah A, Sanni K, Ogunbayo S, Akintayo I, Saito K, Dramé, K. Screening African rice (Oryza glaberrima) for tolerance to abiotic stresses: I. Fe toxicity Field Crops Research, 2018;220(1): 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.04.016

  10. Ezin V, Houessou F, Bryla R, Ahanchede A. Phenotypic plasticity of drought tolerance in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) landraces and hybrid cultivars in Benin, Africa. J Food Agric Environ. 2019;17(3/4):45–53. https://doi.org/10.1234/4.2019.5565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jagadish S, Craufurd WT. High temperature stress and spikelet fertility in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Exp Bot. 2007;58(7):1627–35 https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rice A. Participatory varietal selection of Rice - the Technicien's Manuel, vol. 120. Cotonou Benin; 2010.

  13. Brady N. Symposium on cropping systems Research and Development for the Asian Rice farmer. (Los Banos (Philippines); 1977. p. 21–4.

  14. IPCC, 2001: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA, editors. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press; p. 881.

  15. Khan S, Anwar S, Ashraf MY, Khaliq B, Sun M, Hussain S, et al. Mechanisms and adaptation strategies to improve heat tolerance in Rice. A Review Plants. 2019;8(11):508 https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8110508.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fahad S, Hussain S, Matloob A, Khan FA, Khaliq A, Saud S, et al. Phytohormones and plant responses to salinity stress: a review. Plant Growth Regul. 2015;75:391–404 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-014-0013-y.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsui T, Omasa K, Horie T. High temperature at flowering inhibits swelling of pollen grains, a driving force for thecae dehiscence in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Product Sci. 2000;3:430–434. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.3.430

  18. Satake T, Yoshida S. High temperature-induced sterility in indica Rices at flowering. Jpn J Crop Sci. 1978;47(1):6–17 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.47.6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yoshida S. Fundamental of rice crop science. Los Baños: International Rice Research Institute; 1981. p. 269.

  20. Shah F, Huang J, Cui K, Nie L, Shah T, Chen C, et al. Impact of high-temperature stress on rice plant and its traits related to tolerance. J Agric Sci. 2011;149(5):545–56 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859611000360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Moukoumbi Y, Sie M, Vodouhe R, Nrsquo B, Toulou B, Ogunbayo S, et al. Assessing phenotypic diversity of interspecific rice varieties usingagro-morphological characterization. J Plant Breed Crop Sci. 2011;3:74–86.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Africa Rice Center (WARDA)/FAO/SAA. NERICA: the new rice for Africa – a compendium. Somado EA, Guei RG, Keya SO, editors. Cotonou: Africa Rice Center (WARDA); Rome: FAO; Tokyo: Sasakawa Africa Association; 2008. p. 210.

  23. Ahmadi N. GRiSP: programme international d'amélioration variétale du riz pour les adaptations aux changements globaux; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Krishnan P, Ramakrishnan B, Reddy KR, Reddy V. High-Temp Effects Rice. 2011;111:87–206 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387689-8.00004-7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Korres N, Norsworthy J, Burgos N, Oosterhuis D. Temperature and drought impacts on rice production: an agronomic perspective regarding short-and long-term adaptation measures. Water Resour Rural Dev. 2017;9:12–27 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wrr.2016.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zinn KE, Tunc-Ozdemir M, Harper JF. Temperature stress and plant sexual reproduction: uncovering the weakest links. J Exp Bot. 2010;61(7):1959–68 https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq053.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Aghamolki MTK, Yusop MK, Oad FC, Zakikhani H, Jaafar HZ, Kharidah S, et al. Heat stress effects on yield parameters of selected rice cultivars at reproductive growth stages. J Food Agric Environ. 2014;12(2):741–6.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hatfield JL, Prueger JH. Temperature extremes: effect on plant growth and development. Weather Climate Extremes. 2015;10:4–10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2015.08.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kilasi N L, Singh J, Vallejos C E, Ye C, Jagadish S, Kusolwa P, Rathinasabapathi B. Heat stress tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.): identification of quantitative trait loci and candidate genes for seedling growth under heat stress. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1578. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01578.

  30. Tashiro T, Wardlaw I F. A comparison of the effect of high temperature on grain development in wheat and rice. Ann Bot. 1989;64(1):59–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087808.

  31. Duan H, Tong H, Zhu A, Zhang H, Liu L. Effects of heat, drought and their combined effects on morphological structure and physicochemical properties of rice (Oryza sativa L.) starch. J Cereal Sci. 2020;95:103059 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2020.103059.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Abayawickrama A, Reinke RF, Fitzgerald MA, Harper JD, Burrows GE. Influence of high daytime temperature during the grain filling stage on fissure formation in rice. J Cereal Sci. 2017;74:256–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sato K, Inaba K. High temperature injury of ripening in rice plant: V. on the barly decline of assimilate storing ability of grains at high temperature. Jpn J Crop Sci. 1976;45(1):156–61. https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.45.156.

  34. Mohamed H. Heat stress effects on yield parameters of selected rice cultivars at reproductive growth stages. J Food Agric Environ. 2014;12(1):741–6.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Arshad MS, Farooq M, Asch F, Krishna JS, Prasad PV, Siddique KH. Thermal stress impacts reproductive development and grain yield in rice. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017;115:57–72.

  36. Konate KA. Identification des mécanismes physiologiques et génétiques intervenant dans la tolérance à la sécheresse à partir de l'évaluation de caractères secondaires: cas du riz de bas-fond. 2017.

  37. Izam F, Chang X, Jing R. Mapping QTL for chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics parameters at seedling stage as indicators of heat tolerance in wheat. Euphytica. 2015;202:245–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hosseini S, Sarvestani, Pirdashti H, Afkhami A, Hazrati S. Estimation of heritability and genetic advance for screening some rice genotypes at salt stress conditions. Int J Agron Plant Product. 2012;3(11):475–82.

  39. Sellammal R, Robin S. Genotype by environment interaction and grain yield stability analysis of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes under drought. J Progress Agric. 2013;4(2):48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rasel M, Hassan L, Hoque MIU, Saha SR. Estimation of genetic variability, correlation and path coefficient analysis in local landraces of rice (Oryza sativa L.) for the improvement of salinity tolerance. J Bangladesh Agric Univ. 2018;16(1):41–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ahmad F, Hanafi MM, Hakim MA, Rafii MY, Arolu IW, Abdullah SNA. Genetic divergence and heritability of 42 coloured upland rice genotypes (Oryzasativa) as revealed by microsatellites marker and agro-morphological traits. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):0138246. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138246.

  42. Ahmadikhah A. Study on selection effect, genetic advance and genetic parameters in rice. Ann Biol Res. 2010;1(4):45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bekele BD, Naveen G, Rakhi S, Shashidhar H. Genetic evaluation of recombinant inbred lines of rice (Oryza sativa L.) for grain zinc concentrations, yield related traits and identification of associated SSR markers. Pakistan J Biol Sci. 2013;16(23):1714–21. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2013.1714.1721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rasel M, Tahjib U, Arif M, Hossain MA, Sayed MA, Hassan L. Discerning of rice landraces (Oryza sativa L.) for morpho-physiological, antioxidant enzyme activity, and molecular markers’ responses to induced salt stress at the seedling stage. J Plant Growth Regul. 2020;39:41–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Bisne R, Sarawgi A, Verulkar S. Study of heritability, genetic advance and variability for yield contributing characters in rice. Bangladesh J Agric Res. 2009;34:175–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Das S, Sarma D, Kalita P. Morpho-physiological variability in boro rice (Oryza Sativa L.). the. Bioscan. 2015;9(1/2):611–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Danbe N, Yakouba O, Sobda G, Basga SD, Lendzemo V, Kaouvon P, et al. Caractérisation de la diversité phénotypique et génotypique du Sorgho pluvial dans la zone soudano sahélienne du Cameroun. J Appl Biosci. 2018;129:12973–81. https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v129i1.1.

  48. Dhanwani RK, Sarawgi A, Solanki A, Tiwari JK. Genetic variability analysis for various yield attributing and quality traits in rice (O. sativa L.). Bioscan. 2013;8:1403–7.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Dutta P, Dutta P N, Borua P. Morphological traits as selection indices in rice: a statistical view. Univ J Agric Res. 2013;1(3):85–96. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujar.2013.010308.

  50. Kishore NS, Srinivas T, Nagabhushanam U, Pallavi M, Sameera S. Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis for yield and yield components in promising rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. SAARC. J Agric For. 2015;13(1):99–108 https://doi.org/10.3329/sja.v13i1.24184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr. HOUGBEDJI Paul for allowing us to use his land to carry out this experiment.

Funding

No funding was obtained for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Crop Production, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Abomey-Calavi, 01 BP 526, Cotonou, Benin

    Vincent Ezin, Wassiou Worou Ahanchede & Adam Ahanchede

  2. West Africa Centre for Crop Improvement, College of Basic and Applied Science, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana

    Mathieu Anatole Tele Ayenan

  3. World Vegetable Center, West and Central Africa-Coastal and Humid Regions, IITA-Benin Campus, Cotonou, Benin

    Mathieu Anatole Tele Ayenan

Authors
  1. Vincent Ezin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wassiou Worou Ahanchede
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mathieu Anatole Tele Ayenan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Adam Ahanchede
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

VE, WA, and AA conceived and designed the research. WA performed the experiments. VE, and AA assisted with designing the experiments, and revised the article. WA and MATA, analyzed the data. WA drafted the manuscript. VE and MATA revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Ezin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ezin, V., Ahanchede, W.W., Ayenan, M.A.T. et al. Physiological and agronomical evaluation of elite rice varieties for adaptation to heat stress. BMC Plant Biol 22, 236 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03604-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03604-x

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us