Skip to main content
Download PDF

Genome-wide characterization and expression analysis of Erf gene family in cotton

BMC Plant Biology volume 22, Article number: 134 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

AP2/ERF transcription factors are important in a variety of biological activities, including plant growth, development, and responses to biotic and abiotic stressors. However, little study has been done on cotton’s AP2/ERF genes, although cotton is an essential fibre crop. We were able to examine the tissue and expression patterns of AP2/ERF genes in cotton on a genome-wide basis because of the recently published whole genome sequence of cotton. Genome-wide analysis of ERF gene family within two diploid species (G. arboreum & G. raimondii) and two tetraploid species (G. barbadense, G. hirsutum) was performed.

Results

A total of 118, 120, 213, 220 genes containing the sequence of single AP2 domain were identified in G. arboreum, G. raimondii, G. barbadense and G. hirsutum respectively. The identified genes were unevenly distributed across 13/26 chromosomes of A and D genomes of cotton. Synteny and collinearity analysis revealed that segmental duplications may have played crucial roles in the expansion of the cotton ERF gene family, as well as tandem duplications played a minor role. Cis-acting elements of the promoter sites of Ghi-ERFs genes predict the involvement in multiple hormone responses and abiotic stresses. Transcriptome and qRT-PCR analysis revealed that Ghi-ERF-2D.6, Ghi-ERF-12D.13, Ghi-ERF-6D.1, Ghi-ERF-7A.6 and Ghi-ERF-11D.5 are candidate genes against salinity tolerance in upland cotton.

Conclusion

Overwhelmingly, the present study paves the way to better understand the evolution of cotton ERF genes and lays a foundation for future investigation of ERF genes in improving salinity stress tolerance in cotton.

Peer Review reports

Background

Under confrontational environmental conditions such as pathogen attack, submergence, flood, salinity, drought, and cold, a precise expression pattern is shown by genes according to their physiological and biological processes [1]. Most importantly, the expression of functional genes in the genome is maintained by transcription factors (TFs). During biotic/abiotic stresses and developmental processes, the expression of transcription factors of particular genes is enhanced or suppressed by other proteins [2]. Transcription factors for playing a vital role as chief regulators in various biological processes are the most important target for crop engineering [3]. The AP2/ERF family is a large group of plant-specific transcription factors. This gene family having AP2/ERF-type DNA-binding domain of about 60–70 amino acids was first discovered in Arabidopsis homeotic gene, APETALA2 (AP2) [4]. AP2, ERF, RAV, and DREB are four subfamilies of AP2/ERF gene family. AP2 subfamily is different from the other 3 (ERF, DREB, and RAV) subfamilies as it has double AP2/ERF domains while all three have a single AP2/ERF domain whereas RAV is different from ERF and DREB subfamily by having an additional B3 DNA-binding domain. Over the last 20 years, ERF family genes caught attention as overexpression of ERF genes in different plants directed to abiotic stress tolerance and pathogen resistance in transgenic plants [5, 6].

The ERF subfamily members regulate the expression of PR (pathogenesis-related) genes through binding to GCC-boxes (AGCCGCC). Further, ERFs are intricated in signaling pathways including salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, and ethylene pathways which are important for stress response and plant development [7,8,9]. Due to their coordinating ability with multiple signaling and hormonal pathways, ERFs are considered excellent entities for engineering biotic/abiotic stress tolerance in plants [9]. Several studies have shown the involvement of ERF gene expression under different stress tolerance conditions and tissues in plants [10,11,12].

Cotton is the main agro-industrial crop and is the source of the most important natural fiber used in textile production [13]. This plays a vital role in a global economy and is grown in more than seventy countries. The genus Gossypium contains 46 diploid (2n = 2x = 26) and 5 well-established and 1 purported tetraploid (2n = 4x = 52) species. It has been proposed that all diploid cotton species may have evolved from a common ancestor that subsequently diversified to produce eight groups, including groups A–G and K3 [14]. However, biotic and abiotic stresses badly affect the production and growth of cotton. So, the struggles to explore the molecular mechanism of stress to support stress tolerance in plants is real and of fundamental importance for cotton production [15]. Considering the importance of ERF family genes in crop improvement, genome-wide investigation of ERF gene-family in cotton can help us to understand the molecular mechanisms of resistance to stress, and thus aid in the development of cotton varieties, using transgenic technology, with greater tolerance to many adverse environments. The release of different cotton whole-genome sequence data, including Gossypium arboreum L. [16], Gossypium raimondii [17], Gossypium hirsutum L. [18], and Gossypium barbadense L. [19] has made it possible to systematically identify and analyze the cotton ERF genes on a genome-scale level. Here, we performed a comprehensive analysis of cotton ERF genes, including their gene structure, motif compositions, chromosome distribution, duplication patterns, and expression profiles. This study will provide valuable clues for the functional characterization of the ERF gene family in cotton.

Methods

Database and sequence retrieval

Gene sequences of Arabidopsis AtERF were retrieved from the TAIR (Arabidopsis thaliana database) [20]. Cotton genome database Cotton FGD was used for retrieval of G. barbadense (NAU), G. hirsutum (CRI), G. raimondii (JGI) and G. arboreum (CRI) genome sequences [21]. ERF domain sequence was used as a template to retrieve the probable domain homologs from the whole-genome sequence of G. barbadense, G. hirsutum, G. raimondii, and G. arboreum [22] through BLASTP at CottonGen (https://www.cottongen.org). All non-redundant hits with less than 1E-5 E-value were taken. Non-targeted and overlapping sequences were removed. Pfam30.0 (http://pfam.xfam.org/) database was used to retrieve hidden Markov Model (HMM) profile of the U-box domain (PF00847) [22], and retrieved results were used as a template to find out the candidate ERFs from the cotton genome protein database using HMMER3.0 [23]. Protein sequences, CDSs (coding domain sequences), and corresponding full-length sequences in the genome were obtained by using BLAST2.2.31+ (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/executables/blast+/LATEST/). Further, SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/) and Pfam 30.0 [22] databases were used for additional analysis to ensure that each candidate protein contained a U-box domain and BUSCA was used for subcellular localization prediction [24, 25].

Gene structure and conserved motif analyses

MEME (Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation) version 5.3.0 (http://meme-suite.org/tools/meme/), an online tool was used for the identification of conserved motifs of ERF proteins. TBtools software was used to predict gene structure and integrate phylogenetic trees and conserved motifs.

Analysis of Cis-acting regulatory elements in promoter regions

A 1.5 kb of promoter sequence upstream from the transcription start site in each Ghi-ERF gene was extracted from the G. hirsutum genome database and analyzed using PlantCARE online software (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/) to predict the putative cis-acting regulatory elements [26].

Physical location of ERFs on the chromosome and phylogenetic tree

Mapcahrt was used to generate the distribution of cotton ERF on the chromosome. Genome annotation files were used to retrieve the GFF (general feature format) information of the cotton ERFs. The 671 protein sequences of all four species of cotton and 60 protein sequences of Arabidopsis were used for the phylogenetic tree. The Clustal Omega (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/ [27]; was used to align ERF protein sequence and MEGA v7.0 [28] program was used to construct a neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree with 1000 bootstrap replicates.

Gene duplication and micro-synteny analysis in G. arboreum, G. raimondii, G. barbedense and G. hirsutum L

To investigate the collinearity and to analyze the syntenic relationship among the four cotton species, the complete genome sequences of these cotton species along with respective genome annotation files were subjected to MCScanX tool [29]. TBtools software was used to visualize the obtained results. Multiple collinear scanning toolkits (MCScanX) and Dual Synteny Plotter software (https://github.com/CJ-Chen/TBtools/) [30] were used for the analysis of gene duplication events [29] and the syntenic relationship between the ERF genes among cotton species, respectively. Some previous studies showed the identification of homologous gene pairs according to MSA (multiple sequence alignment). Advanced circos was used to visualize the collinearity of homologous genes based on the homology between each species and their positions on the genome [30].

Transcriptome data analysis expression analysis

To identify the expression pattern of identified ERF genes in various tissues of all the four cotton species, the RNA-seq expression data of G. arboreum, G. raimondii, G. barbadense, and G. hirsutum were downloaded from NCBI. The raw expression reads data from various anatomical tissues and various time-points of ovule and fiber of G. arboreum cultivar Shixiya1 and G. hirsutum accession TM-1 were retrieved from NCBI-Bioproject PRJNA594268 [31]. Furthermore, RNA-seq expression data of G. hirsutum accession TM-1 and cultivar Hai7124 were retrieved from NCBI-Bioproject PRJNA490626 [32] for G. barbadense. Similarly, raw expression data of strain Ulbr of G. raimondii were obtained from NCBI-Bioproject PRJNA171262 [33]. The program hisat2 [34], was used for mapping reads, cufflinks (version: 2.2.1) [35], were used to analyze gene expression levels, and fragments per kilobase million values were used to normalize gene expression levels, then the results were log-transformed and a heatmap was generated by MeV [36].

qRT-PCR

Cotton genotype (Eagle-2) was obtained from Four Brothers hybrid seed company Lahore, Pakistan and permission was granted. The cotton (Eagle-2) seeds were germinated on a wet filter paper for 3 days at 25 °C, and then transferred to a Hoagland nutrient solution (Supplementary file 1) [37] in a greenhouse with 60–70% humidity, 14 h photoperiod, and 28 °C day/night temperature. Over a period of 6–8 weeks, the plants were placed in a greenhouse under controlled conditions. The selected cultivar Eagle-2 was exposed to salt stress at 0 dS/m, 10 dS/m, and 15 dS/m at two leaves stage. Newly emerged leaves of the cultivar Eagle-2 were taken after a regular interval of 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h for the extraction of RNA (RNAprep Pure Plant Kit by Tiangen, Beijing, China) and freeze in − 80 °C. RNA concentration and integrity were observed on NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) and 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and cDNA was prepared (PrimeScript® RT Reagent Kit, Perfect Real Time, Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China). Technically, three replicates of each sample were used. The mean expression of mRNA was measured using qRT-PCR (Maxima SYBR Green)/ROX qPCR Master mix (2X), cat#K0221, Thermo scientific, USA. Gene-specific primers were used for the amplification of all the genes and GAPDH was used as an internal control for gene normalization.

Results

Identification, sequence analysis and phylogenetic tree of ERF genes in G. arboreum, G. raimondii, G. barbadense and G. hirsutum

A total of 118, 120, 213, 220 genes were identified in G. arboreum, G. raimondii, G. barbadense, and G. hirsutum respectively. To identify ERF genes, the sequence of ERF domain was a blast against the whole genome sequence of G. arboreum, G. raimondii, G. barbadense, and G. hirsutum. All non-redundant ERF genes were obtained from each species. The amino acid sequence of these 671 ERF genes was evaluated by Pfam software to confirm their reliability and the presence of ERF domains. Genes that lack ERF domain in the encoding protein sequences or truncated genes and the genes that were not annotated in their respective genome were deleted. The detailed information of selected genes for G. arboreum, G. raimondii, G. hirsutum, and G. barbadense are listed in (Supplementary file 1). According to locations on chromosomes the ERF genes in cotton were renamed, Gar-ERF-1A.1-13A in G. arboreum, Gar-ERF-1D.1-13D in G. raimondii, Gba-ERF-1A.1-13D in G. barbadense, Ghi-ERF-1A.1-13D in G. hirsutum. In G. barbadense, 98 ERF genes were discovered on At sub-genome, and 115 genes were identified on Dt sub-genome. In G. hirsutum, 109 genes were identified in At sub-genome and 111 genes were identified in Dt sub-genome. A phylogenetic (neighbour-joining) tree was constructed to determine the evolutionary relationship of ERF genes by using amino acid sequences of identified ERF proteins in G. arboreum, G. raimondii, G. barbadense, and G. hirsutum with corresponding 60 genes of Arabidopsis (Fig. 1). The evolutionary tree classified the ERF genes into 8 clades with well-supported bootstrap values. The clade one is the largest clade followed by clade VI and clade VIII has the lowest number of genes followed by clade IV. The results showed that ERF genes of four species of cotton and Arabidopsis were unevenly distributed in all clades. Only 2 genes from G. arboreum, and 2 from G. raimondii, were found in clade VIII.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Phylogenetic tree of the ERF genes family of cotton and Arabidopsis. Bootstrapping values are indicated as percentages along the branches. The different background colors indicate different groups

Full size image

Chromosome distribution and gene duplication analysis

To discover the ERF genes distribution on chromosomes, each ERF gene was mapped on their corresponding chromosome according to gene information of the respective genome database. To further examine the evolution of ERF genes in four species of cotton, genome duplication events were investigated for WGD or segmental and tandem duplications.

In G. arboreum, 118 ERF genes were unevenly localized on all 13 chromosomes. The results showed that 7, 5, 9, 2, 9, 8, 14, 14, 8, 8, 15, 15, and 4 genes were located on chromosomes A1 to A13 (Fig. 2a). Chromosomes 11 and 12 both contained the highest number of ERF genes (15 ERF) whilst chromosomes 4 and 13 contained a lower number of ERF genes (2 and 4) respectively. To understand the expansion pattern of the ERF gene family in G. arboreum, a circos analysis was performed. The results revealed that 92 ERF genes have WGD or segmental duplication and are located on all chromosomes (Fig. 3A). The 13 ERF family genes were tandemly duplicated and distributed on chromosomes 2, 5, 7, 8, 9, and 12. Other 11 genes were dispersed in G. arboreum genome (Supplementary file 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

a, b Gene Location on chromosome of G. arboreum and G. raimondii. c Gene Location on chromosome of G. barbadense. d Gene Location on chromosome of G. hirsutum

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Duplicated ERF gene pairs identified in G. arboreum, G. raimondii, G. barbadense and G. hirsutum

Full size image

In G. raimondii, 120 ERF genes were distributed unequally on all 13 chromosomes (Fig. 2b). The number of ERF genes from chromosome D01 to D13 was 14, 5, 8, 15, 8, 8, 15, 17, 11, 7, 7, 2, and 3 respectively. The chromosomes D08 and D04 contain the highest number of genes 17 and 15 respectively. While chromosome D12 and D13 exhibited the lowest number of genes 2 and 3 respectively. Among120 ERF genes 74 genes have WGD or segmental duplications and were located unevenly on all chromosomes (Fig. 3B). The chromosomes D08 and D01 contain the highest WGD or segmentally duplicated genes 14 and 10 respectively. On chromosomes D12 and 13 only a single gene have segmental duplications (Fig. 3B). The genes Gra-ERF-1D.6, Gra-ERF-1D.13, Gra-ERF-4D.3, Gra-ERF-4D.9, Gra-ERF-6D.6, Gra-ERF-6D.7, Gra-ERF-6D.8, Gra-ERF-7D.14, Gra-ERF-8D.15, Gra-ERF-9D.4, Gra-ERF-9D.7, Gra-ERF-9D.8, and Gra-ERF-13D.3 have tandem duplications (Supplementary file 2).

In G. barbadense, 213 ERF genes were scattered on all 26 chromosomes of At and Dt sub-genomes. The 98 and 115 ERF genes were identified in At and Dt sub-genomes respectively (Fig. 2C). In At genome of G. barbadense, chromosome A12 had maximum (15) ERF genes whilst chromosome A01 and A13 have a minimum number of ERF genes 2 and 3 respectively. In Dt sub-genome, the chromosomes D08 and D11 contain the greatest number of (15) ERF genes and chromosome D04 had the lowest (3) ERF genes (Fig. 2C). The 182 ERF genes of G. barbadense, have segmental duplications and these were scattered unevenly on all 26 chromosomes. Out of these 182 genes, 42.75 and 57.14% belonged to At and Dt sub-genome respectively (Fig. 3C). Chromosome A13 has only single genes Gba-ERF-13A.3 had segmental duplication. From At sub-genome, the genes Gba-ERF-4A.3, Gba-ERF-4A.4, Gba-ERF-5A.6, Gba-ERF-6A.2, Gba-ERF-7A.4, Gba-ERF-7A.9, Gba-ERF-8A.4, Gba-ERF-10A.7, Gba-ERF-11A.8, Gba-ERF-11A.9, Gba-ERF-13A.1 and Gba-ERF-13A.2 have tandem duplications (Fig. 3C & Supplementary file 2). Only three genes Gba-ERF-7D.13, Gba-ERF-7D.14, and Gba-ERF-11D.13 from Dt sub-genome have tandem duplications (Supplementary file 2).

In G. hirsutum, 220 ERF genes were unevenly distributed on all 26 chromosomes. Among these 220, 109, and 111 ERF genes were located in At and Dt sub-genome respectively (Fig. 2d). In At genome of G. hirsutum, the chromosomes A08 and A12 have maximum (15) ERF genes whilst the chromosomes A10 and A13 have the minimum number of ERF genes 3 and 4 respectively. In Dt sub-genome, chromosome D12 contains the greatest number of (15) ERF genes and chromosomes D01 and D04 have the lowest (3) ERF genes (Fig. 2d). The segmental duplications were found in 94.55% ERF genes of G. hirsutum, 49.52, and 50.48% genes were located in At and Dt sub-genomes respectively (Fig. 3D and Supplementary file 2). Tandem duplications were found in 3.18% ERF genes and these genes were located on chromosomes A07, A08, D07, D08, D09, and D11.

The G. hirsutum and G. barbadense are evolved due to hybridization between an A-genome species (G. herbaceum or G. arboreum) and a D-genome genome (G. raimondii) [38]. To understand the evolutionary relationships of ERF genes, a relative syntenic map of ERF genes from the four cotton species was fabricated (Fig. 4). Synteny analysis showed several gene loci that are highly conserved between the At and Dt sub-genomes of both tetraploid cotton species. According to our MCScan analysis, 237, 105 duplication gene pairs were found between diploid G. arboreum and tetraploid G. barbadense, G. hirsutum respectively. 393, 307 duplication gene pairs were found between diploid G. raimondii and tetraploid G. hirsutum, G. barbadense respectively. The location of ERF genes on D11, D01, D04, and D06 in G. raimondii have a good collinear relationship with the ERF genes present on the homologous chromosomes of G. hirsutum and G. barbadense (Fig. 4). The ERF genes on chromosome A11 in G. arboreum also have a good collinear relationship with the ERF genes present on the homologous chromosomes of G. hirsutum and G. barbadense. The synteny map revealed that small deletion, duplication and reshuffling of the chromosome may have occurred during evolution. To elucidate the divergence throughout cotton evolution, we examined the orthologous of cotton ERF genes between G. arboreum, G. raimondii and G. hirsutum. In G. arboreum, a total of 113 and 117 orthologs were recognized in G. raimondii and G. hirsutum respectively. One hundred twenty orthologs were identified between G. raimondii, and G. hirsutum. Additionally, a total of 8 and 4 paralogs for ERF genes were identified in G. hirsutum and G. raimondii respectively (Supplementary file 2A).

Fig. 4
figure 4

The sub-genome distribution and synteny analysis of cotton ERF genes. The blue lines indicate duplicated ERF pairs, the gray lines indicate collinear blocks

Full size image

Gene structure and conserved motifs of the cotton ERF gene family

For more understanding into the evolution and structural diversity of the ERF family in each cotton species, we analyzed the gene structure and conserved motif of the ERF genes. Motif 1 and 2 were conserved in all ERF genes across all four species. In G. arboreum, based on the evolutionary tree the ERF family genes are categorized into 3 groups. As shown in (Fig. 5A) only 16 genes have introns and accounting for 13.56% and the remaining 86.44% of genes are intron-less. All the ERF family genes have conserved exon number (1) except the 16 genes that contain introns have 2 exon numbers. The transcript length of 118 ERF genes of G. arboreum, is 384–1269 bp, and the protein sequences are 127–422 aa. The Isoelectric Point of these proteins exists between 4.292 and 10.542, and the molecular weight is between 14.323 kDa and 47.137 kDa (Supplementary file 1). To gain more insight into the divergence and functional relationship of Gar-ERF proteins, a total of 12 conserved motifs in the cotton ERF were recognized by MEME software, and the height of each letter in the logo was proportional to the conservation level of amino acid in all sequences analyzed. As shown in (Fig. 5A) all the Gar-ERF proteins contain motifs 1 and 2. The motifs in different groups indicated that varying degrees of divergence among them. The genes Gar-ERF-11A.12 and Gar-ERF-12A.7 were distinct in group 1 due to the presence of motif 12. The presence of motif 3 in some genes of group 2 and 3 make them different from other genes. In general, the G. arboreum, ERF proteins in the same group usually contained similar motifs, which indicates that they may play similar roles in the development and growth of G. arboreum.

Fig. 5
figure 5

A Evolutionary tree with motif and gene architecture of ERF gene family in G. arboreum. B Evolutionary tree with motif and gene architecture of ERF gene family in G. raimondii. C Evolutionary tree with motif and gene architecture of ERF gene family in G. barbadense. D Evolutionary tree with motif and gene architecture of ERF gene family in G. hirsutum

Full size image

The transcript length of 120 ERF genes of G. raimondii is 399–2134 bp, and the protein sequences are 127–420 aa. The Isoelectric Point of these proteins exists between 4.312 and 10.846, and the molecular weight is between 14.318 kDa and 47.139 kDa. 80.83% of genes were intron-less and 19.16% of genes have introns (Fig. 5B & Supplementary file 1). The gene Gra-ERF-1D.9 had the highest mean intron length 3401 bp. The 81.66, 15, and 4.16% genes have exon number 1, 2 and 3 respectively. The mean exon length ranges between 260 and 2134 bp. The motif 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 were detected in 40, 30, 13, 20, 5, 18, 7, 5, 5, and 8 genes respectively. The genes were divided into 3 groups based on the evolutionary tree. In group 1 the genes Gra-ERF-3D.8, Gra-ERF-8D.15, Gra-ERF-4D.10, Gra-ERF-8D.6, Gra-ERF-8D.14 were distinct due to the presence of motif 10. In group 2, only one gene was unique due to the presence of motif 3 (Fig. 5B).

The transcript length of 213 ERF genes of G. barbadense was 339–1914 bp. The protein sequences are range between 112 and 637 aa. The Isoelectric Point of these proteins exists between 4.312 and 11.24, and the molecular weight is between 12.866 kDa and 71.803 kDa (Supplementary file 1). 62.44% of genes were intron-less and 37.55% of genes have introns. The gene Gba-ERF-4A.6 had the highest mean intron length 3145 bp while the gene Gba-ERF-3D.1 lowest mean intron length 27 bp. The exon number are 1–4 in all ERF genes of G. barbadense and the mean exon length was 119–1275 (Supplementary file 1). The motif 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 were detected in 25, 39, 45, 35, 49, 14, 13, 17, 41 and 19 genes respectively (Fig. 5C).

The transcript length of 220 ERF genes of G. hirsutum, was 327–10,114 bp. The protein sequences are range between 108 and 483 aa. The Isoelectric Point of these proteins exists between 4.284 and 10.846, and the molecular weight is between 11.992 kDa and 52.887 kDa. 86.36% of genes were intron-less and 13.64% of genes have introns. The gene Ghi-ERF-10A.2 had the highest mean intron length 2202 bp while the genes Ghi-ERF-5A.1 and Ghi-ERF-3D.3 have the least intron length 27 bp. Most of the genes 190, and 27 genes have 1 and 2 exon numbers (Supplementary file 1). The mean exon length is 119.5–1839. The motif 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 were detected in 60, 80, 25, 32, 16, 11, 15, 12, 26 and 8 genes respectively (Fig. 5D).

Predicted subcellular localization

The 93.22% ERF genes of G. arboreum, were predicted in the nucleus. The genes Gar-ERF-3A.9, Gar-ERF-5A.2, Gar-ERF-6A.3 and Gar-ERF-8A.10 were found in the chloroplast. Only 3 genes namely Gar-ERF-6A.7, Gar-ERF-8A.3 and Gar-ERF-8A.6 were predicted in extracellular spaces. Only the gene was present in mitochondria (Supplementary file 1). The 92.5 and 4.16% ERF genes of G. raimondii, were predicted in nucleus and chloroplast respectively (Supplementary file 1). Only 1 and 3 genes were predicted in mitochondria and extracellular spaces respectively. The 89.20 and 5.63% ERF genes of G. barbadense, were predicted in nucleus and chloroplast respectively (Supplementary file 1). Only 5 genes were predicted in extracellular spaces. The 91.81, 4.54, and 2.73%, ERF genes of G. hirsutum, were predicted in the nucleus, chloroplast and extracellular spaces, respectively (Supplementary file 1). Only Ghi-ERF-1A.2 and Ghi-ERF-4A.4 genes were predicted in mitochondria and plasma membrane respectively.

Analysis of putative Cis-acting elements in Ghi-ERFs promoters

To investigate the further biological activity of Ghi-ERFs, the 1.5 kb upstream promoter regions of all Ghi-ERFs were obtained and analyzed the cis-acting regulatory elements by using the PlantCARE database. Various types of elements were found in the promoter sites of ERF genes in G. hirsutum (Fig. 6& Supplementary file 3). The cis-acting elements which were the binding regions of transcription factors play important role in regulating gene expression. The distribution of cis-acting elements among different genes was different, as shown in (Fig. 6& Supplementary file 3) a large number of cis-acting elements were predicted to be related to transcription, various hormones, and stresses response, cell cycle, and development. The promoter sites of all Ghi-ERF genes contained both CAAT-box and Unnamed-4 cis-acting regulatory elements. The CAAT box plays a key role in the regulation of nopaline synthase promoters [39]. The core element TATA-box was found in most of the motifs is important for transcription. There exist multiple phytohormone responsive elements including ABA response element (ABRE), ethylene-responsive element (ERE), MeJA-responsive element (CGTCA-motif, MYC and TGACG-motif), GA-responsive element (P-box), and salicylic acid-responsive element (TCA-element), suggesting that Ghi-ERFs expression were regulated by different phytohormones. Various light-related elements such as (Sp1, I-box, 3-AF1 binding site, TCT-motif, and Gap-box) were also observed. The stress-responsive elements were detected in the promoter of some Ghi-ERFs, like ARE (anaerobic induction element), STRE (stress-responsive element), LTR (low temperature-responsive elements), dehydration-responsive element (DRE1 and DRE-core), TC-rich repeats (defence and stress-responsive element), and wound-responsive element (WRE3 and WUN-motif). Some growth and development elements were also predicted, including endosperm-expression element (AACA-motif and GCN4-motif), and meristem-expression element (CAT-box and CCGTCC-motif). The results indicated that Ghi-ERFs are involved in plant growth and development as well as environmental stress responses.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Predicted cis-elements in the promoter regions of G. hirsutum ERF genes

Full size image

Expression analysis from Transcriptome data

Various expression patterns of different cotton ERF genes were detected across different tissues like seed, stem, leaves, flower, and fiber. RNA-seq data for fiber (0 DPA (Days Post Anthesis) ovules, 1 DPA ovules, 3 DPA ovules, 5 DPA and 10 DPA fibers) and seed (10 DPA, 20 DPA, 30 DPA, and 40 DPA) of G. arboreum, was used for expression analysis. The Gar-ERF genes were clustered in 5 pattern groups based on the heat map of fiber and seed. Generally, a similar expression pattern was observed within groups. The genes of groups 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were highly expressed in ovule 5DPA, 3DPA, 1DPA, 0DPA and fiber 10DPA respectively. From group first only Gar-ERF-11A.7 were upregulated in seed, ovule and fiber development. Whereas, Gar-ERF-4A.1 and Gar-ERF-5A.1 were upregulated in fiber and ovule whilst downregulated in seed development (Fig. 7a). Twenty-one genes in G. arboreum did not express in any tissues.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Expression patterns of ERF genes (a & b) in seed, ovule and fiber of G. arboreum, and G. raimondii and in (c) expression patterns of ERF genes in seed, ovule fiber, tissue and flower of G. barbadense

Full size image

In the case of G. raimondii, the genes of groups 1, 2, 4, and 5 were highly expressed in seed 20 DPA, 10 DPA, 40 DPA and 30 DPA respectively. The genes of group 3 were highly expressed in seed at 40 DPA and 30 DPA. In the case of seed, the heat map of Gra-ERF genes was clustered in six pattern groups (Fig. 7b). As for as seed and ovule were concerned, most of the genes of groups 1 and 5 were highly expressed at 20DPA whereas, 2 and 4 groups exhibited higher expression at 30 DPA, additionally, groups 3 and 6 demonstrated high expression at 40 and 10 DPA respectively. The genes of groups 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 were highly expressed in fiber 10DPA, fiber 20DPA, ovule 1DPA, 0DPA, and 3DPA respectively. Similarly, Gar-ERF-7D.12 exhibited relatively up-regulation in seed, ovule, and fiber development (Fig. 7b). Nineteen genes have null expression across all the tissues.

The expression profile of Gba-ERF genes in ovule (0DPA, 1DPA, 3DPA, 5DPA, 10DPA, 20DPA) organs (root, stem, leaf epicalyx, receptacles), flower (sepal, petal, filament, anther), and fiber (10 DPA ovules, 20 DPA ovules, 25 DPA ovules) were investigated. The expression pattern of Gba-ERF genes in the ovule clustered the genes in 5 groups (Fig. 7c). The genes of groups 1, and 2 were expressed in ovule at 0DPA, and 20DPA respectively. The genes of group 3 were mostly expressed in 5DPA followed by 3DPA and 1DPA respectively. Most of the genes of group 4 were expressed at 10DPA. The genes of group 5 were highly expressed in 0DPA and 1DPA. The heat map of Gba-ERF genes in organs clustered the genes into 4 groups based on their expression pattern (Fig. 7c). The genes of 1st group were highly expressed in the receptacle and a few genes of 1st group in leaf epicalyx. Most of the genes of group 2 were highly expressed in the root. The genes of groups 3 and 4 were expressed in stem and leaf epicalyx respectively. In the case of flower and fiber the heat map also clustered the genes into 4 groups. In flower, the genes of groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 were highly expressed in petal, anther, sepal and filament respectively (Fig. 7c). Most of the genes of groups 1 and 3 were highly expressed in fiber at 25DPA but the genes Gba-ERF-5D.8, Gba-ERF-3A.4, Gba-ERF-7A.2, Gba-ERF-11D.13 from 1st group were expressed in fiber at 20 DPA. The genes of group 2 were expressed in fiber at 20 DPA. The genes of group 4 were highly expressed in fiber at 10 DPA (Fig. 7C). Specifically, Gba-ERF-2A.4 exhibited up-regulation in ovule development, fiber development, root, stem, petal, filament, and anther.

In G. hirsutum, the Ghi-ERF genes expression was examined in organs (root, stem, leaf, filaments, anther), ovule (10DPA, 15DPA, 20DPA, 25DPA), fiber (10DPA, 15DPA, 20DPA, 25DPA), salinity, heat, cold, and PEG stress for (1 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 h) respectively. Based on Ghi-ERF genes expression in organs (root, stem, leaf, filaments and anther), the genes were clustered in 5 groups (Fig. 8A). Most of the genes of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were highly expressed in anther, filaments, stem, leaf and root respectively. An ovule and fiber, based on heat map Ghi-ERF genes were clustered in 4 expression pattern groups (Fig. 8A). For ovule, most of the genes of groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 were highly expressed at 25DPA, 20DPA, 10DPA, and 15DPA respectively. Most of the genes of groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 were highly expressed in fiber at 10DPA, 20DPA, 15DPA, and 25DPA respectively. Under salt stress, the heat map clustered the genes in 3 groups (Fig. 8A). Most of the Ghi-ERF genes of group 1 were highly expressed at NaCl 1 h, while some genes of group 1 were also expressed at NaCl 24 h. The Ghi-ERF genes of 2nd group were differentially expressed at NaCl 3 h, NaCl 6 h, and NaCl 12 h. Most of the genes of group 3 were highly expressed at NaCl 12 h. The heat map of Ghi-ERF genes in heat stress divides the genes into three groups. The genes of group 1 were highly expressed at 37 C 1 h. Most of the genes of 2nd and 3rd groups were highly expressed at 37 C 6 h and 37 C 3 h respectively (Fig. 8A). Some genes of group 3 were also expressed at 37 C in 24 h and 12 h. The expression of ERF genes under cold and PEG stress the heat map clustered these genes in 5 groups. In the case of cold stress, most of the genes of group 1 were expressed at 4C in 1 h and 12 h. The genes of groups 2, 3, 4 and 5 were highly expressed at 4C in 24 h, 3 h, 6 h and 24 h respectively. In the case of PEG stress, most of the genes of groups 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were highly expressed in 24 h, 6 h, 3 h, 12 h and 1 h respectively (Fig. 8A). Interestingly, Ghi-ERF-2D.6, Ghi-ERF-6D.1, Ghi-ERF-11D.5, Ghi-ERF-12D.13, and Ghi-ERF-7A.6 demonstrated comparatively up-regulation under various tissues.

Fig. 8
figure 8

A Expression patterns of ERF genes in tissue, ovule, fiber and (salinity, heat, cold and PEG) conditions at for (1 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 h) in G. hirsutum. B Relative expression patterns of twelve Ghi-ERF genes under NaCl treatment analyzed by qRT-PCR

Full size image

Examination of the expression of ERF genes by qPCR

The quantitative measurement of mRNA expression in the leaf of cultivar Eagle-2 at different salt stress levels after regular intervals was performed. GAPDH was used as an internal control of gene normalization. In Fig. 8B, the genes Ghi-ERF-2D.6, Ghi-ERF-12D.13, Ghi-ERF-6D.1, Ghi-ERF-7A.6 and Ghi-ERF-11D.5 showed relatively higher expression at 15 dS/m, 10dS/m, 0dS/m, 10 dS/m and 10 dS/m after regular intervals of 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h respectively. This expression level of the genes is the highest among all the genes and these five genes showed significant tolerance against salt stress. Primers are listed in Supplementary file 4.

Discussion

In plants, the (AP2/EREBP) superfamily is one of the important and largest transcription factor (TF) families. AP2/ERF domain specifies different members of the (AP2/EREBP) family. The domain consists of up to 60–70 amino acids [4]. These members have necessary roles in the growth and development of plants, and in responding to a variety of environmental stresses involving heat, drought, salinity, cold and various pathogen infections. The roles are exerted either by direct response to the stresses or by regulation of expression of target genes downstream [40]. Numerous studies have recognized different numbers of ERF family members in plants; like in soybean 120 ERF family members [41], cucumber 103 (Hu & Liu, 2011) tomato 85 [42], rice 139 [43] and 147 Arabidopsis [44] respectively.

Arabidopsis, used as the model plant comprises 147 AP2/EREBP genes divided into 4 subfamilies which are; APETALA2 (AP2), Ethylene-Responsive Factor (ERF), Dehydration-Responsive Element Binding protein (DREB), and Related to ABI3/VP1 (RAV) subfamilies [45]. Subfamily members of ERF and DERB containing single conserved domain AP2 and making the largest groups in superfamily AP2/EREBP, perform important roles in various plant processes and variety of stress responses. The sequences containing one AP2 domain have the biggest number of members in the superfamily AP2/EREBP, which have been further divided into 2 major subfamilies; ERF subfamily and DREB subfamily [46].

Cotton is an important economic crop in the world providing the leading share of the world’s natural textile fiber and a substantial amount of edible oil. Studies revealed the formation of the allotetraploid Gossypium species occurred about 1–1.5 million years back through a polyploidization event that involved two species; one being A-genome species called G. arboreum and the other was paternal D-genome species named G. raimondii [18].

WGD or polyploidy is being acknowledged as a source of evolution in plants, a significant force resulting in enormous silencing and removal of duplicated genes [47]. In this study, we identified 118, 120, 213, 220 ERF genes in G. arboreum, G. raimondii, G. barbadense and G. hirsutum respectively. The evolutionary tree showed that more ERF proteins appeared in pairs and clustered together with 2 Gba-ERF, 2 Ghi-ERF, 1 Gar-ERF and 1 Gra-ERF which supported the cotton species polyploidization event that occurred 1.5 million years ago [48].

The tetraploid cotton should contain ERF genes in a number equal to ERF genes contained in G. arboreum plus ERF genes in G. raimondii. Though the number of ERF genes actually in allotetraploids (G. barbadense 213 and G. hirsutum 220) appeared lesser than those in two diploids (G. arboreum 118 and G. raimondii 120), implying that the chromosomes doubling and then genome rapid sequence arrangement would produce gene loss of different degrees in polyploidization process [18]. Gene duplication is a significant source of evolution in the genome and turn genetic system by producing new gene subfamilies [49]. Polyploidy, segmental, and Tandem duplications chiefly help to generate new gene families [49]. ERF genes in G. arboreum, (13), G. barbadense (15), G. hirsutum (7) and G. raimondii, (13) have tandem duplications. Segmental duplications frequently take place in plants as most plants occur as diploidized polyploids [50]. In G. arboreum (92), G. hirsutum (208), G. barbadense (182), and G. raimondii (74) ERF genes have undergone segmental or WGD duplications.

There’s a possibility of deletion of some of the pre-existing genes or newly generated genes during the process of cotton evolution. Collinearity and chromosomal locations showed the significant role of segmental duplications in ERF genes expansion in cotton which was following the results reported in rice, B. napus, A. thaliana and other plants [10, 42, 51, 52]. The synteny analysis results could be used to reveal the evolutional and functional connections among the cotton species. In these studies, 237, 105 duplication gene pairs were established between diploid G. arboreum and tetraploid G. barbadense, G. hirsutum correspondingly. And there were 393, 307 duplication gene-pairs established between diploid G. raimondii and tetraploid G. hirsutum, G. barbadense correspondingly. Our study analysis showed a higher homology between ERF genes of tetraploid and diploid cotton species. Some ERF genes did not find any orthologous gene pairs, which could be attributed to chromosomes rearrangement or fusion during the evolution [53, 54].

Gene structure analysis plays a crucial role in revealing the function of genes [51]. Here, our results suggested that 13.56, 19.16, 37.55 and 13.64% genes possess introns in G. arboreum, G. raimondii, G. barbadense and G. hirsutum respectively. The ERF members demonstrated similar gene structures within the same group. Loss of introns occurred more rapidly in genes than intron acquisition after segmental duplication [55]. Also, some studies revealed that intron number and distribution were related to evolution in plants [56] in a way that introns possibly have been lost during evolution from ERF family genes in higher plants. Our results showed that 86.44, 80.83, 62.44, and 86.36% ERF genes have no introns which are similar to the status in Arabidopsis, cucumber, and rice [57,58,59]. Transcriptional output can be delayed due to long multiple introns, possibly causing suppression of genes expression in adverse conditions. Contrarily, the genes containing small or fewer introns might have efficient expression while responding to stress environments [60]. Therefore many intron-less ERF genes might react quickly to the external environment variations [51]. The transcription factors domains and motifs perform essential roles during transcriptional activity, proteins interaction, and DNA binding [61].

Here, a total of 12 conserved motifs in the G. arboreum, G. raimondii, G. barbadense and G. hirsutum for ERF genes were identified. Gene function diversity could be affected by different numbers and types of motifs present in ERF proteins, in all four species. Motif 1 and motif 2 in all ERF genes of cotton were highly conserved. The ERF family members, in general, shared similar structures of gene and motif compositions within the same group, which proposes the possibility of their similar roles in plant growth and development. In promoter sites, Cis-regulatory elements of genes play key roles in plant stress responses [62]. Various cis-acting elements responsible for stresses, phytohormones, growth and development were discovered in the promoter sites of Ghi-ERFs, stipulating the potential role of Ghi-ERFs in regulating several responses to phytohormones, environmental stresses, and development. For example, (ABRE, CGTCA-motif, MYC, TGACG-motif, ERE, P-box, and TCA-element), (ARE, STRE, LTR, DRE1, DRE-core, TC-rich repeats, WRE3 and WUN-motif) and (CAT-box, CCGTCC-motif, AACA-motif and GCN4-motif), are associated to phytohormones, stresses, growth and development respectively [63,64,65,66,67]. Based on these results, we speculate that the Ghi-ERFs genes are probably involved in abiotic stress responses.

The study of expression patterns of genes is used to predict the function of genes [53]. In this study the ERF genes showed high expression in ovule (0DPA, 1DPA, 3DPA, 5DPA, 10DPA, 20DPA) organs (root, stem, leaf epicalyx, receptacles), flower (sepal, petal, filament, anther) and fiber (10 DPA, 20 DPA, 25 DPA) across the species, suggesting that these genes have key roles in growth and development of cotton plant. Moreover, the expression of cotton ERF in different tissues or diverse stages, showed that these genes could be more stable than those that only expressed in specific tissues or one stage of an organ. Most of the ERF genes in G. hirsutum were also expressed in salt and heat stress.

Ghi-ERF-2D.6, Ghi-ERF-12D.13, Ghi-ERF-6D.1, Ghi-ERF-7A.6 and Ghi-ERF-11D.5 identified as candidate genes against salinity tolerance in upland cotton by RT-PCR. According to previous studies, some ERF genes were involved in various stresses responses in plants, such as high-salt, low-temperature, and drought stress [46, 57]. Overall, the above findings provide a foundation to further investigate the potential function of cotton ERF genes. These analyses are not only helpful in selecting valuable candidate ERF genes for further functional studies but also has important implication for genetic improvement for agricultural production and stress tolerance in cotton crop.

Conclusions

In this study, a genome-wide analysis of cotton ERF genes was performed. The 671 ERF genes in four species were identified and classified in detail. Protein lengths, molecular weights, and theoretical isoelectric points of cotton ERF vary greatly. The evolutionary characteristics, expression patterns of ERF genes in various cotton organs and growth stages, and their response to abiotic stress were studied. The expression profile analysis suggested that the ERF gene family of upland cotton may be important in stress responses. We proved that Ghi-ERF-2D.6, Ghi-ERF-12D.13, Ghi-ERF-6D.1, Ghi-ERF-7A.6 and Ghi-ERF-11D.5 are responsive to salt stress by qRT-PCR. These results will be helpful to understand the biological role of the ERF genes in cotton growth and development.

Availability of data and materials

We did not generate any sequencing data during this experiment. We have used already published RNA-seq. Data with FPKM values from NCBI database to select our candidate genes to perform RT_PCR. And their bio-project numbers are already mentioned in the manuscript. The detailed links are given below.

We have used all the genomes and their transcriptomic data from Cotton Functional Genomics Database (CottonFGD) (https://cottonfgd.org). Moreover, the raw expression reads data from various anatomical tissues and various time-points of ovule and fiber of G. arboreum cultivar Shixiya1 and G. hirsutum accession TM-1 were retrieved from NCBI-Bioproject PRJNA594268. Furthermore, RNA-seq expression data of G. hirsutum accession TM-1 and cultivar Hai7124 were retrieved from NCBI-Bioproject PRJNA490626 for G. barbadense. Similarly, raw expression data of strain Ulbr of G. raimondii were obtained from NCBI-Bioproject PRJNA171262.

References

  1. Loudet O, Hasegawa PM. Abiotic stress, stress combinations and crop improvement potential. Plant J. 2017;90(5):837–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cui L, Feng K, Wang M, Wang M, Deng P, Song W, et al. Genome-wide identification, phylogeny and expression analysis of AP2/ERF transcription factors family in Brachypodium distachyon. BMC Genomics. 2016;17(1):636.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaufmann K, Airoldi CA. Master regulatory transcription factors in plant development: a blooming perspective. In: Plant Transcription Factors. UK: Springer; 2018. p. 3–22.

  4. Wessler SR. Homing into the origin of the AP2 DNA binding domain. Trends Plant Sci. 2005;10(2):54–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu ZS, Chen M, Li LC, Ma YZ. Functions and application of the AP2/ERF transcription factor family in crop improvement F. J Integr Plant Biol. 2011;53(7):570–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Phukan UJ, Jeena GS, Tripathi V, Shukla RK. Regulation of Apetala2/ethylene response factors in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:150.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Mantiri FR, Kurdyukov S, Lohar DP, Sharopova N, Saeed NA, Wang X-D, et al. The transcription factor MtSERF1 of the ERF subfamily identified by transcriptional profiling is required for somatic embryogenesis induced by auxin plus cytokinin in Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol. 2008;146(4):1622–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cai X-T, Xu P, Zhao P-X, Liu R, Yu L-H, Xiang C-B. Arabidopsis ERF109 mediates cross-talk between jasmonic acid and auxin biosynthesis during lateral root formation. Nat Commun. 2014;5(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gu C, Guo Z-H, Hao P-P, Wang G-M, Jin Z-M, Zhang S-L. Multiple regulatory roles of AP2/ERF transcription factor in angiosperm. Bot Stud. 2017;58(1):1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghorbani R, Zakipour Z, Alemzadeh A, Razi H. Genome-wide analysis of AP2/ERF transcription factors family in Brassica napus. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2020;26(7):1463–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Dossa K, Wei X, Li D, Fonceka D, Zhang Y, Wang L, et al. Insight into the AP2/ERF transcription factor superfamily in sesame and expression profiling of DREB subfamily under drought stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2016;16(1):171.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Srivastava R, Kumar R. The expanding roles of APETALA2/ethylene responsive factors and their potential applications in crop improvement. Brief Funct Genomics. 2019;18(4):240–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Han Z, Qin Y, Li X, Yu J, Li R, Xing C, et al. A genome-wide analysis of pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) protein-encoding genes in four Gossypium species with an emphasis on their expression in floral buds, ovules, and fibers in upland cotton. Mol Gen Genomics. 2020;295(1):55–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fan W-B, Wu Y, Yang J, Shahzad K, Li Z-H. Comparative chloroplast genomics of Dipsacales species: insights into sequence variation, adaptive evolution, and phylogenetic relationships. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:689.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Jin L-G, Liu J-Y. Molecular cloning, expression profile and promoter analysis of a novel ethylene responsive transcription factor gene GhERF4 from cotton (Gossypium hirstum). Plant Physiol Biochem. 2008;46(1):46–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Li F, Fan G, Wang K, Sun F, Yuan Y, Song G, et al. Genome sequence of the cultivated cotton Gossypium arboreum. Nat Genet. 2014;46(6):567–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang K, Wang Z, Li F, Ye W, Wang J, Song G, et al. The draft genome of a diploid cotton Gossypium raimondii. Nat Genet. 2012;44(10):1098–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang T, Hu Y, Jiang W, Fang L, Guan X, Chen J, et al. Sequencing of allotetraploid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. acc. TM-1) provides a resource for fiber improvement. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33(5):531–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu X, Zhao B, Zheng H-J, Hu Y, Lu G, Yang C-Q, et al. Gossypium barbadense genome sequence provides insight into the evolution of extra-long staple fiber and specialized metabolites. Sci Rep. 2015;5:14139.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lamesch P, Berardini TZ, Li D, Swarbreck D, Wilks C, Sasidharan R, et al. The Arabidopsis information resource (TAIR): improved gene annotation and new tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(D1):D1202–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhu T, Liang C, Meng Z, Sun G, Meng Z, Guo S, et al. CottonFGD: an integrated functional genomics database for cotton. BMC Plant Biol. 2017;17(1):1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Finn RD, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, Mistry J, Mitchell AL, et al. The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D279–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Finn RD, Clements J, Arndt W, Miller BL, Wheeler TJ, Schreiber F, et al. HMMER web server: 2015 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(W1):W30–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu CS, Chen YC, Lu CH, Hwang JK. Prediction of protein subcellular localization. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinformatics. 2006;64(3):643–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Savojardo C, Martelli PL, Fariselli P, Profiti G, Casadio R. BUSCA: an integrative web server to predict subcellular localization of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(W1):W459–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lescot M, Déhais P, Thijs G, Marchal K, Moreau Y, Van de Peer Y, et al. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(1):325–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal omega. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7(1):539.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33(7):1870–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang Y, Tang H, DeBarry JD, Tan X, Li J, Wang X, et al. MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(7):e49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, Thomas HR, Frank MH, He Y, et al. TBtools: An integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant. 2020;13(8):1194–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Huang G, Wu Z, Percy RG, Bai M, Li Y, Frelichowski JE, et al. Genome sequence of Gossypium herbaceum and genome updates of Gossypium arboreum and Gossypium hirsutum provide insights into cotton A-genome evolution. Nat Genet. 2020;52(5):516–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Hu Y, Chen J, Fang L, Zhang Z, Ma W, Niu Y, et al. Gossypium barbadense and Gossypium hirsutum genomes provide insights into the origin and evolution of allotetraploid cotton. Nat Genet. 2019;51(4):739–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Paterson AH, Wendel JF, Gundlach H, Guo H, Jenkins J, Jin D, et al. Repeated polyploidization of Gossypium genomes and the evolution of spinnable cotton fibres. Nature. 2012;492(7429):423–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Xu F-C, Liu H-L, Xu Y-Y, Zhao J-R, Guo Y-W, Long L, et al. Heterogeneous expression of the cotton R2R3-MYB transcription factor GbMYB60 increases salt sensitivity in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2018;133(1):15–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Jiang Y, Xie Q, Wang W, Yang J, Zhang X, Yu N, et al. Medicago AP2-domain transcription factor WRI5a is a master regulator of lipid biosynthesis and transfer during mycorrhizal symbiosis. Mol Plant. 2018;11(11):1344–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang P, Wang R, Ju Q, Li W, Tran L-SP, Xu J. The R2R3-MYB transcription factor MYB49 regulates cadmium accumulation. Plant Physiol. 2019;180(1):529–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Hoagland DR, Arnon DI. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Circ Calif Agric Experiment Stn. 1950;347(2nd edit).32.

  38. Fang DD. Cotton fiber: physics, chemistry and biology: Springer; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Dai Z, An K, Edward GE, An G. Functional role of CAAT box element of the nopaline synthase (nos) promoter. J Plant Biol. 1999;42(2):181–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Müller M, Munné-Bosch S. Ethylene response factors: a key regulatory hub in hormone and stress signaling. Plant Physiol. 2015;169(1):32–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Li X-P, Tian A-G, Luo G-Z, Gong Z-Z, Zhang J-S, Chen S-Y. Soybean DRE-binding transcription factors that are responsive to abiotic stresses. Theor Appl Genet. 2005;110(8):1355–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sharma MK, Kumar R, Solanke AU, Sharma R, Tyagi AK, Sharma AK. Identification, phylogeny, and transcript profiling of ERF family genes during development and abiotic stress treatments in tomato. Mol Gen Genomics. 2010;284(6):455–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Sharoni AM, Nuruzzaman M, Satoh K, Shimizu T, Kondoh H, Sasaya T, et al. Gene structures, classification and expression models of the AP2/EREBP transcription factor family in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011;52(2):344–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Dietz K-J, Vogel MO, Viehhauser A. AP2/EREBP transcription factors are part of gene regulatory networks and integrate metabolic, hormonal and environmental signals in stress acclimation and retrograde signalling. Protoplasma. 2010;245(1–4):3–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Feng J-X, Liu D, Pan Y, Gong W, Ma L-G, Luo J-C, et al. An annotation update via cDNA sequence analysis and comprehensive profiling of developmental, hormonal or environmental responsiveness of the Arabidopsis AP2/EREBP transcription factor gene family. Plant Mol Biol. 2005;59(6):853–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sakuma Y, Liu Q, Dubouzet JG, Abe H, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. DNA-binding specificity of the ERF/AP2 domain of Arabidopsis DREBs, transcription factors involved in dehydration-and cold-inducible gene expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;290(3):998–1009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Jiao Y, Wickett NJ, Ayyampalayam S, Chanderbali AS, Landherr L, Ralph PE, et al. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature. 2011;473(7345):97–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Li F, Fan G, Lu C, Xiao G, Zou C, Kohel RJ, et al. Genome sequence of cultivated upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum TM-1) provides insights into genome evolution. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33(5):524–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Cannon SB, Mitra A, Baumgarten A, Young ND, May G. The roles of segmental and tandem gene duplication in the evolution of large gene families in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2004;4(1):10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhu Y, Wu N, Song W, Yin G, Qin Y, Yan Y, et al. Soybean (Glycine max) expansin gene superfamily origins: segmental and tandem duplication events followed by divergent selection among subfamilies. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14(1):93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Huang Y, Liu Y, Zhang M, Chai M, He Q, Jakada BH, et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the ERF transcription factor family in pineapple (Ananas comosus (L.) Merr.). PeerJ. 2020;8:e10014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Li P, Chai Z, Lin P, Huang C, Huang G, Xu L, et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of AP2/ERF transcription factors in sugarcane (Saccharum spontaneum L.). BMC Genomics. 2020;21(1):1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhang M, Liu Y, Shi H, Guo M, Chai M, He Q, et al. Evolutionary and expression analyses of soybean basic Leucine zipper transcription factor family. BMC Genomics. 2018;19(1):159.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. He D, Lei Z, Xing H, Tang B. Genome-wide identification and analysis of the aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) gene superfamily of Gossypium raimondii. Gene. 2014;549(1):123–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Lin H, Zhu W, Silva JC, Gu X, Buell CR. Intron gain and loss in segmentally duplicated genes in rice. Genome Biol. 2006;7(5):R41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Qiu Y-L, Cho Y, Cox JC, Palmer JD. The gain of three mitochondrial introns identifies liverworts as the earliest land plants. Nature. 1998;394(6694):671–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Nakano T, Suzuki K, Fujimura T, Shinshi H. Genome-wide analysis of the ERF gene family in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Physiol. 2006;140(2):411–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Zhu H, Han X, Lv J, Zhao L, Xu X, Zhang T, et al. Structure, expression differentiation and evolution of duplicated fiber developmental genes in Gossypium barbadense and G. hirsutum. BMC Plant Biol. 2011;11(1):40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Ahmed S, Rashid MAR, Zafar SA, Waqas M, Uzair M, Azhar MT, et al. Genome-wide investigation and expression analysis of APETALA-2 transcription factor subfamily reveals its evolution, expansion and regulatory role in abiotic stress responses in Indica Rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica). Genomics. 2020;113(1):1029–43.

  60. Heyn P, Kalinka AT, Tomancak P, Neugebauer KM. Introns and gene expression: cellular constraints, transcriptional regulation, and evolutionary consequences. BioEssays. 2015;37(2):148–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Liu L, White MJ, MacRae TH. Transcription factors and their genes in higher plants. Eur J Biochem. 1999;262(2):247–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhao W, Liu Y-W, Zhou J-M, Zhao S-P, Zhang X-H, Min D-H. Genome-wide analysis of the lectin receptor-like kinase family in foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2016;127(2):335–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Zhu C, Schraut D, Hartung W, Schäffner AR. Differential responses of maize MIP genes to salt stress and ABA. J Exp Bot. 2005;56(421):2971–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Onishi M, Tachi H, Kojima T, Shiraiwa M, Takahara H. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel salt-inducible gene encoding an acidic isoform of PR-5 protein in soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.). Plant Physiol Biochem. 2006;44(10):574–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Yang R, Chen M, Sun J-C, Yu Y, Min D-H, Chen J, et al. Genome-wide analysis of LIM family genes in Foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) and characterization of the role of SiWLIM2b in drought tolerance. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(6):1303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Faraji S, Rasouli SH, Kazemitabar SK. Genome-wide exploration of C2H2 zinc finger family in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. Durum): insights into the roles in biological processes especially stress response. Biometals. 2018;31(6):1019–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Zhang H, Liu D, Yang B, Liu W-Z, Mu B, Song H, et al. Arabidopsis CPK6 positively regulates ABA signaling and drought tolerance through phosphorylating ABA-responsive element-binding factors. J Exp Bot. 2020;71(1):188–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to the Prof. Yuan Youlu, Prof. Maozhi Ren and Dr. Amir Shakeel on providing us the expert opinion and facilities performing the analysis and writing the entire manuscript.

Funding

Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang-China. The funding agencies provided only the expenses and fees of this study. The experimental design and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and manuscript writing were performed by the contributing authors.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Muhammad Mubashar Zafar, Abdul Rehman and Abdul Razzaq contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zhengzhou Research Base, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China

    Muhammad Mubashar Zafar, Abdul Rehman & Maozhi Ren

  2. State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory of Biological and Genetic Breeding of Cotton, The Ministry of Agriculture; Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Anyang, 455000, Henan, China

    Muhammad Mubashar Zafar, Abdul Rehman, Abdul Razzaq, Huijuan Mo, Yuan Youlu & Maozhi Ren

  3. The Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan

    Abdul Razzaq

  4. Center of Agricultural Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan

    Aqsa Parvaiz & Ghulam Mustafa

  5. University Institute of Physical Therapy, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan

    Faiza Sharif

  6. Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan

    Amir Shakeel

Authors
  1. Muhammad Mubashar Zafar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdul Rehman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abdul Razzaq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aqsa Parvaiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ghulam Mustafa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Faiza Sharif
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Huijuan Mo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yuan Youlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Amir Shakeel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Maozhi Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

“Conceptualization, M.M.Z, A.R1 and A.R2; methodology, A.R.; software, A.R; validation, A.R1, AR2, FS and MMZ.; formal analysis, A.P.; investigation, G.M.; data curation, H.M.; writing—original draft preparation, MMZ; writing—review and editing, A.R1 and A.R2; visualization, A.S.; supervision, Y.Y. and M.R; funding acquisition, Y.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.”

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yuan Youlu, Amir Shakeel or Maozhi Ren.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest for the publication of the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zafar, M.M., Rehman, A., Razzaq, A. et al. Genome-wide characterization and expression analysis of Erf gene family in cotton. BMC Plant Biol 22, 134 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03521-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03521-z

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us