Skip to main content
Download PDF

Development of molecular markers based on the promoter difference of LcFT1 to discriminate easy- and difficult-flowering litchi germplasm resources and its application in crossbreeding

BMC Plant Biology volume 21, Article number: 539 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Litchi is a well-known subtropical fruit crop. However, irregular bearing attributed to unstable flowering is a major ongoing problem for the development of the litchi industry. In a previous study, our laboratory proved that litchi flowering was induced by low temperature and that a FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) homologue gene named LcFT1 played a pivotal role in this process. The present study aimed to understand the natural variation in FT among litchi germplasm resources and designed markers to verify easy- and difficult-flowering litchi germplasms. A grafting experiment was also carried out to explore whether it could shorten the seedling stage of litchi seedlings.

Results

Two types of LcFT1 promoter existed in different litchi germplasm resources, and we named them the ‘easy-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter’ and ‘difficult-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter’, which resulted in three different LcFT1 genotypes of litchi germplasm resources, including the homozygous easy-flowering type of the LcFT1 genotype, homozygous difficult-flowering type of the LcFT1 genotype and heterozygous LcFT1 genotype of litchi germplasm resources. The homozygous easy-flowering type of the LcFT1 genotype and heterozygous LcFT1 genotype of the litchi germplasm resources completed their floral induction more easily than the homozygous difficult-flowering type of the LcFT1 genotype of litchi germplasm resources. Herein, we designed two kinds of efficient molecular markers based on the difference in LcFT1 promoter sequences and applied them to identify of the easy- and difficult-flowering litchi germplasm resources. These two kinds of molecular markers were capable of clearly distinguishing the easy- from difficult-flowering litchi germplasm resources at the seedling stage and provided the same results. Meanwhile, grafting the scion of seedlings to the annual branches of adult litchi trees could significantly shorten the seedling stage.

Conclusions

Understanding the flowering characteristics of litchi germplasm resources is essential for easy-flowering litchi breeding. In the present study, molecular markers provide a rapid and accurate approach for identifying the flowering characteristics. The application of these molecular markers not only significantly shortened the artificial crossbreeding cycle of easy-flowering litchi cultivars but also greatly saved manpower, material resources and land.

Peer Review reports

Background

Litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.), a member of the Sapindaceae family, is a well-known subtropical evergreen fruit crop. Litchi has been widely cultivated in tropical and subtropical areas in the world, particularly in South China [15]. Previous production experiences have shown that a few litchi cultivars, such as ‘Sanyuehong’ and ‘Feizixiao’, need a shorter period of low temperature to complete their floral induction in October or November, and generally flower in January or February. However, most litchi cultivars must experience a longer period of low temperature in winter to complete their floral induction and then generally flower in April, approximately 2 months later than the former in South China. Thus, it is easier for the former to complete floral induction than for the latter. Therefore, they are named easy- and difficult-flowering litchi cultivars in this study. Previous production experiences have also suggested that the lack of low temperature is the main cause of unstable flowering of difficult-flowering litchi cultivars, such as ‘Nuomici’ and ‘Guiwei’, which are very popularly favoured by customers due to the high quality of their fruits.

Irregular bearing attributed to unstable flowering is a major ongoing problem for the development of the litchi industry. The unreasonable cultivation structure of easy- and difficult-flowering litchi cultivars is the main reason for the problems mentioned above. The easy-flowering litchi cultivars more easily complete floral induction than the difficult-flowering cultivars. However, few easy-flowering litchi cultivars with high quality are currently available for commercial cultivation in litchi production. Thus, it is particularly important to breed high-quality, easy-flowering litchi cultivars to develop new easy-flowering cultivars with the potential for both high quality and high yield. At the same time, there is a need to better understand the genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying the natural variation in flowering between the easy- and difficult-flowering litchi cultivars for the future work of litchi breeding.

At present, artificial crossbreeding of easy-flowering litchi cultivars has become a feasible method and can be applied to develop new easy-flowering cultivars with high quality. Marker-assisted selection (MAS) is a valuable tool to identify plants with traits of interest at an early stage in the breeding process [18]. MAS has been widely used in crop breeding [6, 8, 13, 16]. In a previous study, we demonstrated that litchi flowering was induced by low temperature and a FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) homologue gene named LcFT1, which plays a pivotal role in the litchi floral transition [11]. Floral transition is one of the major phases in the life cycle of flowering plants. Reproductive success in plants relies on the proper timing of the floral transition [20]. In the model plant species Arabidopsis, this floral transition is coordinately regulated by four major pathways, including autonomous pathways, gibberellin pathways, photoperiod pathways and vernalization pathways [3, 5, 14, 22], which are integrated into flowering genetic pathways via a small group of floral integrators, including FT, SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS 1 (SOC1) and LEAFY (LFY) [9, 20]. FT, a small and mobile protein, interacts with the bZIP transcription factor FLOWERING LOCUS D (FD) to activate the transcriptional factors APETALA1 (AP1), SOC1, FRUITFUL (FUL) and SEPALLATA 3 (SEP3), finally initiating the switch from vegetative growth to reproductive development [1, 2, 10, 23, 24, 26]. Herein, we found that two types of LcFT1 promoters existed among different litchi germplasm resources, namely, the ‘easy-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter’ and the ‘difficult-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter’. We also found that the litchi germplasm resources including the easy-flowering type of the LcFT1 promoter, were easy-flowering germplasm resources. In the present study, we designed and employed an efficient marker system based on the difference in LcFT1 promoter sequences and applied this system to discriminate easy- from difficult-flowering litchi germplasm resources. Meanwhile, we carried out a litchi crossbreeding experiment for the breeding of easy-flowering cultivars with high quality.

Results

Cloning of the promoter sequences of the LcFT1 gene and sequence analysis

In this study, 88 litchi germplasm resources (Table S1) were used for further research and observation. We extracted their total DNA samples whose quality and quantity had met the requirements of the follow-up experiments (Fig. S1). Then, an approximately 1500-bp promoter sequence of the LcFT1 gene was cloned from 88 litchi germplasm resources. The results showed that there were only two types of LcFT1 promoters existing in different litchi germplasm resources named ‘easy-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter’ and ‘difficult-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter’, respectively. Sequence analysis showed that there were four INDELs and 36 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) between the easy- and difficult-flowering types of LcFT1 promoter sequences (Fig. 1). The 88 litchi germplasm resources included three different LcFT1 genotypes, namely homozygous easy-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter litchi genotypes (NO:1–10), homozygous difficult-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter litchi genotypes (NO:11–62), and heterozygous LcFT1 promoter litchi genotypes (NO:63–88). They are listed in Supplemental Table 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Alignment of the easy- and difficult-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter sequences. (‘E’: easy-flowering type of the LcFT1 promoter, ‘D’: difficult-flowering type of the LcFT1 promoter, red underline: the location of ELcFT1_F and ELcFT1_R, black underline: the location of DLcFT1_F and DLcFT1_R, blue underline: the location of CELcFT1_F and CELcFT1_R, red box: start codon)

Full size image

Molecular marker development

The experiments described above have shown that there are only two types of LcFT1 promoters existing in different litchi germplasm resources and three different LcFT1 genotypes. To identify the different LcFT1 genotypes, we designed two markers according to the difference in the easy- and difficult-flowering types of LcFT1 promoters and verified them with 88 different litchi germplasm resources. The marker ELcFT1_F_ELcFT1_R produced bands of 218, 0 and 218 bp in 10 homozygous easy-flowering type LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars (NO:1–10), 52 homozygous difficult-flowering type LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars (NO:11–62) and 26 heterozygous LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars (NO:63–88), respectively (Fig. 2A). The marker DLcFT1_F_DLcFT1_R produced bands of 0, 202 and 202 bp in 10 homozygous easy-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars (NO:1–10), 52 homozygous difficult-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars (NO:11–62) and 26 heterozygous LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars (NO:63–88), respectively (Fig. 2B). The above results showed that these two markers could clearly identify the different LcFT1 genotypes.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The markers ELcFT1_F_ELcFT1_R and DLcFT1_F_DLcFT1_R were verified on the 88 different litchi germplasm resources. A Marker ELcFT1_F_ELcFT1_R produced bands of 218, 0 and 218 bp in 10 homozygous easy-flowering type LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars (NO:1–10), 52 homozygous difficult-flowering type LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars (NO:11–62) and 26 heterozygous LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars (NO:63–88), respectively. B Marker DLcFT1_F_DLcFT1_R produced bands of 0, 202 and 202 bp in 10 homozygous easy-flowering type LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars (NO:1–10), 52 homozygous difficult-flowering type LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars (NO:11–62) and 26 heterozygous LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars (NO:63–88), respectively. (M: DL 2000 marker)

Full size image

To further verify the accuracy and reliability of the above molecular markers, we also designed another kind of molecular marker, CELcFT1_F and CELcFT1_R, and used it to distinguish 88 different litchi germplasm resources. The pair of primers striding over three indels was designed in the same sequence of these two types of LcFT1 promoters (Fig. 1). The expected product sizes were 672 bp for the easy- and 657 bp for the difficult-flowering type of the LcFT1 promoter. Owing to the very small difference between the amplified fragments (15 bp), the method of agarose gel electrophoresis cannot easily distinguish the different LcFT1 genotypes (Fig. S2). Therefore, the PCR products of this marker obtained from different samples were analysed by capillary electrophoresis. The results showed that the CELcFT1_F and CELcFT1_R markers produced 672 and 657 bp for 10 homozygous easy-flowering LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars and 52 homozygous difficult-flowering LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars, respectively (Fig. 3A, B) and produced 672 bp and 657 bp for 26 heterozygous LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars simultaneously (Fig. 3C). This marker could also clearly identify the different LcFT1 genotypes and provided the same results as the above markers (ELcFT1_F_ELcFT1_R and DLcFT1_F_DLcFT1_R) and the results of promoter sequencing analysis.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The markers CELcFT1_F and CELcFT1_R were verified on the 88 different litchi germplasm resources using capillary electrophoresis. The CELcFT1_F and CELcFT1_R markers produced bands of 672 and 657 bp for 10 homozygous easy-flowering LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars (NO: 1–10) and 52 homozygous difficult-flowering LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars (NO: 11–62), respectively (A, B), and produced 672 and 657 bp for 26 heterozygous LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars simultaneously (NO:62–88) (C). The horizontal scale indicates fragment size (in bp), and the vertical scale indicates relative fluorescence intensity (in rfu)

Full size image

Correlation analysis between the flower formation rates and the LcFT1 promoter types in different litchi germplasm resources

The results of the above experiment showed that the 88 litchi germplasm resources included 10 homozygous easy-flowering LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars, 52 homozygous difficult-flowering LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars and 26 heterozygous LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars. One important discovery made in this study is that all easy-flowering litchi cultivars belong to the homozygous easy-flowering type of the LcFT1 promoter or heterozygous LcFT1 promoter. However, all difficult-flowering litchi cultivars belong to the homozygous difficult-flowering type of the LcFT1 promoter. Our next aim was to better understand the correlation between flower formation rates and LcFT1 promoter types in different litchi germplasm resources. Hence, we observed the flowering of the above 88 litchi germplasm resources and calculated their flower formation rates in 2016 and 2017. Simultaneously, we recorded the daily mean air temperatures from November 1 to March 1 in the winter of 2015 and 2016. The air temperature records showed that the winter in 2015 was much colder than the winter in 2016 (Fig. 4). The statistical results of flower formation rates showed that almost all LcFT1 promoter types of litchi cultivars could well flower in 2016, owing to the plenty of low temperature in the winter of 2015 (Table S1). However, owing to the lack of low temperature in winter of 2016 (namely, green winter), most of the homozygous difficult-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars could not flower in 2017; even though a few cultivars did flower, the flower formation rates were generally low (Table S1). However, almost all the homozygous easy-flowering type of the LcFT1 promoter and heterozygous LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars flowered (Table S1). Figure 5 shows that ‘Guiwei’, ‘Nuomici’ and ‘Maguili’, three homozygous difficult-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars, could not flower in 2017 (Fig. 5D, E, F), but ‘Sanyuehong’, ‘Feizixiao’ and ‘Lanzhu’ (three homozygous easy-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars) and ‘Ruanzhizaohong’, ‘Dahongpao’ and ‘Jinzhong’ (three heterozygous LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars) could be well flowering (Fig. 5A, B, C, G, H, and I). The above results indicated that those litchi germplasm resources containing the easy-flowering type of the LcFT1 promoter can easily complete their floral induction and then flower even in the green winter.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The comparison of the daily mean air temperature in winter from November 1 to March 1 between 2015 and 2016. The air temperature was obtained using an automatic temperature recording system at the experimental orchard

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Observation of flowering in different LcFT1 promoter types of litchi cultivars in 2017. ‘Guiwei’, ‘Nuomici’ and ‘Maguili’, three homozygous difficult-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars (D, E, F), could not be flowering owing to the lack of low-temperature in winter of 2016, whereas ‘Sanyuehong’, ‘Feizixiao’ and ‘Lanzhu’ (three homozygous easy-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars (A, B, C)) and ‘Ruanzhizaohong’, ‘Dahongpao’ and ‘Jinzhong’ (three heterozygous LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars, G, H, I) could be flowering well. (A ‘Sanyuehong’, B ‘Feizixiao’, C ‘Lanzhu’, D ‘Guiwei’, E ‘Nuomici’, F ‘Maguili’, G ‘Ruanzhizaohong’, H ‘Dahongpao’, and I ‘Jinzhong’)

Full size image

The application of these molecular markers in litchi crossbreeding

At present, it is particularly important to carry out the breeding of high-quality easy-flowering litchi cultivars for the healthy development of the litchi industry. The artificial crossbreeding of litchi was carried out using ‘Sanyuehong’, a homozygous easy-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivar, and ‘Ziniangxi’, a homozygous difficult-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivar, as male and female parents, respectively. The marker ELcFT1_F_ELcFT1_R was used to identify the seedlings. We initially obtained 387 F1 hybrid seedlings. However, the PCR amplification was absent in some seedlings (Fig. S3), indicating that these seedlings do not acquire the easy-flowering type of the LcFT1 gene from the male parent of Sanyuehong, and they are false hybrid seedlings. Finally, we obtained 216 true F1 hybrid seedlings, from which a target band of 218 bp was amplified with the marker ELcFT1_F_ELcFT1_R (Fig. S3). Simultaneously, we found that these true heterozygous LcFT1 promoter types of F1 hybrid seedlings can easily complete floral induction even in the green winter, which was consistent with our findings above. Generally, it takes approximately 5 years or longer for litchi seedlings to flower. We grafted litchi seedlings to the end cycle of adult large branches, and the scion could bloom and bear fruit in the second year (Fig. 6), which significantly shortens the litchi hybrid breeding cycle. Through the above methods, we created many litchi germplasm resources with easy flowering and good quality in a very short time, such as ‘ZS-35’ named ‘Red Coral’ (Fig. 6E).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Grafting litchi seedlings to the ends of adult tree branches can significantly shorten litchi childhood. A The new litchi germplasms identified as true hybrids by the above developed molecular markers. B Annual litchi hybrid seedlings are grafted to the ends of adult tree branches. C Scion growth after 2 months of grafting. D The scion can blossom in the second year. E The new litchi germplasm resource ‘ZS-35’ named ‘Red Coral’ with easy flowering and good quality was created by the above methods

Full size image

Discussion

Litchi is an important subtropical evergreen fruit crop with high commercial value due to its high nutritional value and favourable taste. However, unstable yield attributed to the unreasonable structure of the easy- and difficult-flowering litchi cultivars of cultivation is a major ongoing problem for litchi producers in China, with difficult-flowering cultivars accounting for the predominant proportion. Once the low temperature in winter is insufficient, most difficult-flowering litchi cultivars cannot complete their floral induction. One of the main reasons for this unreasonable structure is the lack of high-quality easy-flowering litchi cultivars. Hence, the breeding of easy-flowering litchi cultivars with high quality is particularly important for the development of new cultivars for the healthy development of the litchi industry. The traditional breeding process is tedious and time-consuming with a quite low success rate. Thus, new approaches are needed to accelerate the development of new cultivars with the potential for both high quality and high yield. The CRISPR/Cas system has been widely applied in plant breeding, which enables promising new opportunities to create genetic diversity for breeding [4, 17, 21, 27]. Unfortunately, due to the lack of a genetic transformation system for litchi, the CRISPR/Cas system cannot be used in litchi genome improvement at present, although it can greatly accelerate the breeding process. Additionally, MAS is a process in which morphological, biochemical, and/or DNA markers are utilized for the indirect selection of desirable traits that could be utilized in breeding at the seedling stage [8, 28]. MAS can significantly enhance genetic gain, especially in cases where phenotypes are highly dependent on specific environmental conditions and selection is time-consuming or where traits such as grain quality and disease resistance are pivotal [19]. The selection of an appropriate MAS is the key for the success of the selection of desirable traits.

In this study, we found that two types of LcFT1 promoters existed in different litchi germplasm resources named ‘easy-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter’ and ‘difficult-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter’, which resulted in three different LcFT1 genotypes of litchi cultivars, including homozygous easy-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivar, homozygous difficult-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivar and heterozygous LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivar. Therefore, in the future, CRISPR can be used to precisely modify the difficult-flowering type of the LcFT1 promoter. It will be possible to obtain easy-flowering cultivars with high quality more quickly. The correlation analysis between the flower formation rates and the LcFT1 promoter types among 88 different litchi germplasm resources showed that almost all the homozygous easy-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars and heterozygous LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars are easy-flowering litchi cultivars, which easily complete their floral induction even in a green winter. However, almost all the homozygous difficult-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars are difficult-flowering litchi cultivars, and it is more difficultly to complete their floral induction in the green winter. This important and novel finding is crucial to the crossbreeding of litchi. However, some homozygous difficult flowering genotypes, including ‘Huaizhi’, ‘Xiapuli’, ‘Shuimi’, ‘Kaleka’, and ‘Seedling tree-11’, could flower well in green winters with higher flowering rates than some heterozygous easy flowering genotypes. Litchi flowering is a very complicated biological process that is influenced by various environmental and endogenous signals. Chilling is an irreplaceable factor for litchi flowering, and abiotic stress, such as water, nitric oxide, and reactive oxygen species, could promote flowering in litchi [7, 30]. Tree growth and nutritional status are also important factors affecting litchi flowering. The difference in these factors may be attributed to the higher flowering rates of some homozygous difficult flowering genotypes than the flowering rates of some of the heterozygous easy flowering types in the green winter.

Based on the above results, two molecular markers (ELcFT1_F_ELcFT1_R and DLcFT1_F_DLcFT1_R) were designed according to the sequence difference between the easy- and difficult-flowering types of the LcFT1 promoter and then used to verify 88 different litchi germplasm resources by agarose gel electrophoresis. The results showed that these markers can efficiently identify easy- and difficult-flowering litchi germplasm resources (Fig. 2). To verify the accuracy and reliability of the above molecular marker, we designed another kind of molecular marker, CELcFT1_F and CELcFT1_R, and then used that molecular marker to distinguish the above 88 different litchi germplasm resources by capillary electrophoresis. The results showed that this marker could also efficiently identify easy- and difficult-flowering litchi germplasm resources (Fig. 3), and the same results were obtained with the above two molecular markers, which also further verified the accuracy and reliability of the molecular marker development of principle. However, the cost of capillary electrophoresis is much more expensive than the cost of agarose electrophoresis. Thus, the molecular markers ELcFT1_F_ELcFT1_R and DLcFT1_F_DLcFT1_R are the first method for the identification of easy- and difficult-flowering characteristics of litchi. Unlike annual herbs, as litchi is a subtropical perennial evergreen fruit crop, its childhood phase is very long (approximately five years or more), which makes the cycle of artificial litchi crossbreeding especially long. In addition, the litchi tree body is very large and covers a large amount of land and is not conducive to carrying out artificial crossbreeding. Thus, MAS is especially important for identifying litchi germplasm resources with traits of interest at an early stage in artificial crossbreeding. Herein, we designed and employed two efficient marker systems and found that they can not only significantly shorten the litchi crossbreeding cycl, but also greatly save manpower, material resources and land. Meanwhile, the above marker systems play an important role in the regional promotion of litchi cultivars. The cultivars identified as difficult-flowering litchi germplasm resources are suitable for cultivation in late-ripening producing areas with sufficiently low temperature in winter and overcome the disadvantages of cultivars that are difficult to flower. The cultivars identified as easy-flowering litchi germplasm resources can be planted in early-ripening producing areas where low temperatures are insufficient in winter, giving play to the advantages of easy flowering and early maturation. The identified cultivars can avoid the heavy economic loss caused by the blind promotion of litchi cultivars and have a wide range of application prospects.

Generally, the qualities of difficult-flowering litchi cultivars are much better than the qualities of easy-flowering cultivars. At present, only a few easy-flowering cultivars have been cultivated on a commercial scale in China even though they an easily complete their floral induction. However, they are not very favoured by customers due to their poor qualities, including acidic taste and rough flesh. To breed easy-flowering litchi cultivars with high quality for the optimization of the cultivation structure of litchi cultivars, we carried out a crossbreeding experiment. According to our studies, homozygous easy-flowering LcFT1 promoter litchi germplasm resources and high-quality difficult-flowering litchi germplasm resources are the best choices for parents to breed easy-flowering litchi cultivars with high quality. In this study, we identified 10 homozygous easy-flowering types of LcFT1 promoter litchi germplasm resources. ‘Sanyuehong’, a homozygous easy-flowering type of the LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivar that we had already identified, was used as the male parent, and ‘Ziniangxi’, a high quality and homozygous difficult-flowering type of the LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivar, was used as the female parent. Through screening with the molecular marker ELcFT1_F_ELcFT1_R, we finally obtained 216 pure heterozygous F1 hybrid seedlings, which also showed the characteristics of easy flowering even in the green winter. This experimental result further validates the reliability of these molecular markers. The 171 F1 hybrid seedlings are not produced target bands. This result indicated that they were not hybrid offspring of the male parent of Sanyuehong. Because litchi is monoecious, the 171 seedlings may be the offspring of self-pollination due to imperfectly emasculation. Besides, in generally the female and male flowers were open two or three times in batches. It may have another batch of female flowers after cross-pollination and produce unexpected fruits in case of incomplete removement of female flowers. We also found that grafting litchi seedlings to the ends of adult tree branches can significantly shorten the litchi childhood phase, which further shortens the litchi crossbreeding cycle. Our work has paved a good foundation for the future breeding of high-quality easy-flowering litchi cultivars.

In this study, we developed two types of molecular markers to discriminate easy- from difficult-flowering litchi germplasm resources based on the promoter difference of LcFT1, and we successfully applied them in litchi crossbreeding, particularly in the breeding of new easy-flowering cultivars with high quality. However, there are still many key issues, such as whether specific regulatory elements existing within the easy-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter sequences are functionally active and lead to those litchi germplasm resources containing easy-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter that can easily complete their floral induction and why grafting litchi seedlings to the ends of adult tree branches can significantly shorten litchi childhood phase requires being further elucidated. These will be the main directions of our future research. Simultaneously, the breeding of new high-quality easy-flowering cultivars will be another main direction of our future work for the optimization of the cultivation structure of litchi cultivars to make an important contribution to the healthy development of the litchi industry.

Conclusions

The present study indicates that the natural variation in litchi FT determines the flowering characteristics of litchi. Molecular markers used to identify easy- and difficult-flowering litchi germplasms were developed. Moreover, grafting litchi seedlings to the ends of adult large branches could significantly shorten the seedling stage.

Methods

Plant materials and DNA extraction

Leaves of 88 main litchi germplasm resources were sampled in the experimental orchard of South China Agricultural University (Guangzhou, Guangdong, China). The 88 litchi germplasm resources are listed in Supplemental Table 1. The typical easy-flowering cultivars include ‘Sanyuehong’, ‘Hemaoli’, ‘Feizixiao’, ‘D11’, and ‘Lanzhu’, etc. They need a shorter period of low temperature to complete their floral induction and generally flower in January or February. The typical difficult-flowering cultivars include ‘Guiwei’, ‘Nuomici’, ‘Maguili’, ‘Yuhebao’, and ‘Ziniangxi’, They generally need a longer period of low temperature in winter to complete their floral induction and flower in April. Their total DNA samples were extracted following the protocol of Doyle and Doyle [12]. The quantity of the isolated total DNA samples was evaluated with a spectrophotometer (Eppendorf, Germany) and their quality was confirmed by electrophoresis in a 0.8% agarose gel. The isolated DNA samples were diluted to 20 ng/μL and used immediately for PCR amplification or stored at − 20 °C.

Cloning of the promoter sequences of the LcFT1 gene and sequence analysis

Based on the genome databases established previously by our teams, the promoter sequences of LcFT1 were cloned from the 88 litchi germplasm resources mentioned above with the primers LcFT1_F1 and LcFT1_R1. Primer sequences are listed in Supplemental Table 2. PCR amplifications were performed in a 25 μL reaction volume containing 50 ng of template DNA, 2.5 μL of 10× PCR buffer (with MgCl2), 0.5 mM dNTPs, 1.0 μL of each forward and reverse primer (10 pmol/μL), and 0.5 U X5 high-fidelity DNA Polymerase (Mei5 Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China). PCR was carried out in a Veriti® thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 25 s, 55 °C for 30 s and 68 °C for 90 s, with an extension at 68 °C for 5 min, and final cooling to 4 °C. The PCR products were analysed by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis to verify the size and to ensure the specific amplification, then were cloned into the M5 HiPer pTOPO-Blunt vector (Mei5 Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China) and sequenced (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). Promoter sequence analysis was carried out with online software PlantPAN.

Molecular marker primer design for distinguishing easy- from difficult-flowering litchi germplasm resources by agarose gel electrophoresis

Two molecular markers were designed and used to distinguish easy- from difficult-flowering litchi germplasm resources using agarose gel electrophoresis. One set of primers, namely, ELcFT1_F and ELcFT1_R, was designed based on the specific sequence and its flanking regions in the easy-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter sequence (Fig. 1). The expected PCR product sizes were 218 bp for the easy- and 0 bp for the difficult-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter. The other set of primers, namely, DLcFT1_F and DLcFT1_R, was designed based on the specific sequence and its flanking regions in the difficult-flowering type of the LcFT1 promoter sequence (Fig. 1). The expected PCR product sizes were 0 bp for easy-flowering and 202 bp for difficult-flowering LcFT1 promoters. The sequences of these primers are listed in Supplemental Table 2. PCR amplifications was performed in a 25-μL reaction volume containing 20 ng of template DNA, 1.0 U EX Taq DNA polymerase (TaKaRa, Japan), 2.5 μL of 10x PCR buffer (with MgCl2), 0.5 mM dNTPs, and 0.5 μl of each primer (10 pmol/μl). The PCR amplifications were performed by using a gradient thermal cycler (Eppendorf ep™, Germany) with initial denaturation at 94 °C for 4 min followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 58 °C for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 30 s, with an extension at 72 °C for 5 min, and final cooling to 4 °C. PCR products obtained from different samples under identical conditions of amplification were analysed by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis to verify the size and to ensure the specific amplification. The approximate size was evaluated by comparison to a 2000 bp DNA marker.

Design of another kind of molecular marker primer for distinguishing easy- from difficult-flowering litchi germplasm resources by capillary electrophoresis

Another kind of molecular marker, namely, CELcFT1_F and CELcFT1_R, was also designed and used to distinguish easy- from difficult-flowering litchi germplasm resources using capillary electrophoresis. There were four small insertions and deletions (INDELs) between the easy- and difficult-flowering types of the LcFT1 promoter sequence. This pair of primers of CELcFT1_F and CELcFT1_R stride over three indels and were designed in the same sequence of these two types of LcFT1 promoters (Fig. 1). The expected product sizes were 672 bp for the easy- and 657 bp for the difficult-flowering types of the LcFT1 promoter. The sequences of these primers are listed in Supplemental Table 2. PCR amplification of this marker was performed according to the method described in section 2.2. PCR products obtained from different samples were analysed by capillary electrophoresis to verify the size and to ensure specific amplification. The amplification products were diluted 20-fold, and 1 μL of the diluted products was combined with 9.8 μL ddH2O and 0.20 μL of the GeneScan-500 (ROX) size standard (Applied Biosystems). Samples were denatured at 95 °C for 5 min, quickly cooled on ice, and then genotyped on an ABI PRISM® 3730XL Capillary DNA Sequencer/Genotyper using GeneScan® 3.7 and Genotyper® 3.7 software (Applied Biosystems).

Determination of the reliability and accuracy of the above molecular markers

To determine the reliability and accuracy of the molecular markers mentioned above, 88 litchi germplasm resources were used for testing. These resources included the homozygous easy-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars, the homozygous difficult-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars and the heterozygous LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars. The total DNA samples of these litchi germplasm resources were used as templates, and PCR amplifications of these markers were performed using the molecular marker primers mentioned in sections 2.3 and 2.4, respectively according to the procedures of PCR amplification, agarose gel electrophoresis and capillary electrophoresis mentioned above.

The specificity and accuracy of the markers ELcFT1_F and ELcFT1_R for the presence of specific PCR products with template DNA samples isolated from the above litchi germplasm resources were tested by analysing the PCR-amplified products on 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. The expected product sizes were 218 bp, 0 bp and 218 bp for homozygous easy-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars, homozygous difficult-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars and heterozygous LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars, respectively. The specificity and accuracy of the markers DLcFT1_F and DLcFT1_R for the presence of specific PCR products with template DNA isolated from the above litchi germplasm resources were also tested by analysing the PCR-amplified products on agarose gel using electrophoresis. The expected product sizes were 0 bp, 202 bp and 202 bp for homozygous easy-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars, homozygous difficult-flowering type of LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars and heterozygous LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars, respectively.

The specificity and accuracy of the markers CELcFT1_F and CELcFT1_R for the presence of specific PCR products with template DNA samples isolated from the above litchi germplasm resources were tested by analysing the PCR amplified products using capillary electrophoresis. The expected product size was 672 bp for homozygous easy-flowering type LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars. The expected product size was 657 bp for homozygous difficult-flowering type LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars. The expected product sizes were 672 bp and 657 bp for heterozygous LcFT1 promoter litchi cultivars simultaneously.

Correlation analysis between the flower formation rates and the LcFT1 gene promoter types in different litchi germplasm resources

Observation of flowering timings of different litchi germplasm resources: The field experiments were conducted at the experimental orchard of South China Agricultural University (Guangzhou, Guangdong, China) from 2015 to 2017. Eighty-eight litchi germplasm resources were used for this study. Three trees were chosen for each litchi cultivar, and 50 branches were chosen for each tree to calculate the flower formation rate for each cultivar (flower formation rate = flowering branches/150 × 100%). Simultaneously, we recorded the daily mean air temperatures from November 1 to March 1 in winter with high-accuracy temperature recorder. Finally, we carried out correlation analysis between the flower formation rates and the LcFT1 gene promoter types in different litchi germplasm resources using the partial correlation analysis of SPSS18.0.

Applications of molecular markers in litchi crossbreeding

Litchi crossbreeding experiment: The crossbreeding experiments were conducted at the experimental orchard of Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Nanning, Guangxi, China). The cultivars of Sanyuehong and Ziniangxi were used as male and female parents. Pollen collection, dehydration, and long-term storage for litchi were performed based on the method described by Wang et al. [25]. The artificial crossbreeding of litchi cultivars was carried out following the protocol of Zhang and Liu [29]. The seedlings of the F1 population were grown in an experimental orchard in Xixiangtang District, Nanning. Leaves were sampled from the seedlings of the F1 population. All leaf samples were frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen after harvest and then stored at − 20 °C until further processing for DNA extraction. The identification of a heterozygous F1 population derived from the cross between the Sanyuehong and Ziniangxi was carried out with the above molecular markers (ELcFT1_F and ELcFT1_R) with the detailed methods described above. Finally, we grafted one-year-old litchi hybrid seedlings to the ends of adult tree branches and observed their flower formation rates according to the method described above. Healthy rootstocks and scion branches were selected, and the scion was moisturized before grafting. The stock is thicker than the scion. Grafting was carried out on sunny days at temperature of 20 to 30 °C from March to May. We ensured that the cutting surface of the rootstock and the scion was consistent and butt, and the cambium layers were carefully aligned. The union of rootstock and scion was wrapped with a wax band to prevent drying out.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

References

  1. Abe M, Kobayashi Y, Yamamoto S, Daimon Y, Yamaguchi A, Ikeda Y, et al. FD, a bZIP protein mediating signals from the floral pathway integrator FT at the shoot apex. Science. 2005;309:1052–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. An H, Roussot C, Suárez-López P, Corbesier L, Vincent C, Piñeiro M, et al. CONSTANS acts in the phloem to regulate a systemic signal that induces photoperiodic flowering of Arabidopsis. Development. 2004;131:3615–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Araki T. Transition from vegetative to reproductive phase. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2001;4:63–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beying N, Schmidt C, Pacher M, Houben A, Puchta H. CRISPR–Cas9-mediated induction of heritable chromosomal translocations in Arabidopsis. Nat Plants. 2020;6:638–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cerdán PD, Chory J. Regulation of flowering time by light quality. Nature. 2003;423:881–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chauhan VS, Misra AK. Development of molecular markers for screening of Alnus nepalensis (D. Don) genotypes for the nitrogenase activity of actinorhizal root nodules. Mol Gen Genomics. 2002;267:303–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen HB, Huang HB. Low temperature requirements for floral induction in lychee. Acta Hort. 2005;655:195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen LK, Gao WW, Guo T, Huang CH, Huang M, Wang JF, et al. A genotyping platform assembled with high-throughput DNA extraction, codominant functional markers, and automated CE system to accelerate marker-assisted improvement of rice. Mol Breed. 2016;36:123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Corbesier L, Coupland G. Photoperiodic flowering of Arabidopsis, integrating genetic and physiological approaches to characterization of the floral stimulus. Plant Cell Environ. 2005;28:54–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Corbesier L, Vincent C, Jang S, Fornara F, Fan Q, Searle I, et al. FT protein movement contributes to long-distance signaling in floral induction of Arabidopsis. Science. 2007;316:1030–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ding F, Zhang SW, Chen HB, Su ZX, Zhang R, Xiao QS, et al. Promoter difference of LcFT1 is a leading cause of natural variation of flowering timing in different litchi cultivars (Litchi chinensis Sonn.). Plant Sci. 2015;241:128–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull. 1987;19:11–5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Feng XH, Keim D, Wanjugi H, Coulibaly I, Fu Y, Schwarz J, et al. Development of molecular markers for genetic male sterility in Gossypium hirsutum. Mol Breed. 2015;35:141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Komeda Y. Genetic regulation of time to flower in Arabidopsis thaliana. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004;55:521–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lai B, Hu B, Qin YH, Zhao JT, Wang HC, Hu GB. Transcriptomic analysis of Litchi chinensis pericarp during maturation with a focus on chlorophyll degradation and flavonoid biosynthesis. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liang YH, Lenz RR, Dai WH. Development of retrotransposon-based molecular markers and their application in genetic mapping in chokecherry (Prunus virginiana L.). Mol Breed. 2016;36:109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu L, Gallagher J, Arevalo ED, Chen R, Skopelitis T, Wu QY, et al. Enhancing grain-yield-related traits by CRISPR–Cas9 promoter editing of maize CLE genes. Nat Plants. 2021;7:287–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ma Y, Hu JG, Myers JR, Mazourek M, Coyne CJ, Main D, et al. Development of SCAR markers linked to sin-2, the stringless pod trait in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Mol Breed. 2016;36(7):105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Moose SO, Mumm H. Molecular plant breeding as the foundation for 21st century crop improvement. Plant Physiol. 2008;147:969–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mouradov A, Cremer F, Coupland G. Control of flowering time: interacting pathway as a basis for diversity. Plant Cell. 2002;14:S111–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schindele A, Dorn A, Puchta H. CRISPR/Cas brings plant biology and breeding into the fast lane. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2020;61:7–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Searle I, Coupland G. Induction of flowering by seasonal changes in photoperiod. EMBO J. 2014;23:1217–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Takada S, Goto K. TERMINAL FLOWER2, an Arabidopsis homolog of HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN1, counteracts the activation of FLOWERING LOCUS T by CONSTANS in the vascular tissues of leaves to regulate flowering time. Plant Cell. 2003;15:2856–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Teper-Bamnolker P, Samach A. The flowering integrator FT regulates SEPALLATA3 and FRUITFULL accumulation in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Cell. 2005;17:2661–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang LM, Wu JF, Chen JZ, Fu DW, Zhang CY, Cai CG, et al. A simple pollen collection, dehydration, and long-term storage method for litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.). Sci Hortic. 2015;188:78–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wigge PA, Kim MC, Jaeger KE, Busch W, Schmid M, Lohmann JU, et al. Integration of spatial and temporal information during floral induction in Arabidopsis. Science. 2005;309:1056–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wolter F, Schindele P, Puchta H. Plant breeding at the speed of light: the power of CRISPR/Cas to generate directed genetic diversity at multiple sites. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang LY, Huang ZJ, Wang XX, Gao JC, Guo YM, Du YC, et al. Fine mapping and molecular marker development of anthocyanin absent, a seedling morphological marker for the selection of male sterile 10 in tomato. Mol Breed. 2016;36:107.

  29. Zhang YF, Liu CM. Studies on breeding system of litchi in an artificial way. Trop Agric Sci Technol. 2015;38(2):20–3.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhou B, Li N, Zhang Z, Huang X, Chen H, Hu Z, et al. Hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide promote reproductive growth in Litchi chinensis. Biol Plant. 2012;56(2):321–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Jin-Qiang Chen for his critical comments and suggestions regarding this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31760564, 32060659), Special Fund of Bagui Young Scholar of Guangxi (2019AQ01), Guangxi Natural Science Foundation (2017GXNSFAA198350), Science and Technology Development Fund of Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Guinongke2021YT124), Key R & D Projects in Guangxi (GuikeAB1850029). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Guangxi Crop Genetic Improvement and Biotechnology Key Laboratory, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, 530007, Guangxi, China

    Feng Ding & Haoran Li

  2. Horticultural Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, 530007, Guangxi, China

    Feng Ding, Hongxiang Peng, Hongli Li & Shuwei Zhang

  3. College of Agriculture, State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004, Guangxi, China

    Feng Ding, Jinying Wang & Xinhua He

  4. Horticulture College, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, Guangdong, China

    Houbin Chen

  5. Institute of Tropical Fruit Trees, Hainan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Hainan Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical Fruit Tree Biology, Haikou, 510642, Hainan, China

    Fuchu Hu

  6. School of Advanced Agriculture and Bioengineering, Yangtze Normal University, Chongqing, 408100, China

    Biao Lai

  7. Institute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, 571101, Hainan, China

    Yongzan Wei

  8. College of Horticulture, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, Hainan, China

    Wuqiang Ma

Authors
  1. Feng Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Haoran Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jinying Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hongxiang Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Houbin Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fuchu Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Biao Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yongzan Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Wuqiang Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Hongli Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Xinhua He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Shuwei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.Z. designed this experiment. F.D. performed all experiments and prepared the manuscript. H.R.L., J.W., H.P., H.C., X.H. and H.L. helped with the experiments. F.H., B.L., Y.W. and W.M. helped with the data analysis. All authors reviewed the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuwei Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Agarose gel electrophoresis of DNA samples extracted from 88 litchi germplasm resources (M: DL2000 marker; names of 1–88 litchi cultivars are listed in Supplemental Table 1).

Additional file 2: Figure S2.

The markers CELcFT1_F and CELcFT1_R were verified on the 88 different litchi germplasm resources with agarose gel electrophoresis. The expected product sizes were 672 bp and 657 bp for the easy- and difficult-flowering types of the LcFT1 promoter, respectively. The difference between the amplified fragments is very small (15 bp). Thus, agarose gel electrophoresis canot clearly distinguish the different LcFT1 genotypes. (M: DL 2000 marker).

Additional file 3: Figure S3.

Identification of the F1 population derived from the cross between Sanyuehong and Ziniangxi with the marker ELcFT1_F_ELcFT1_R. (M: DL 2000 marker; 1–48: part of the hybrid seedlings; Note: No target 218-bp band of seedlings is a false hybrid seedling).

Additional file 4: Table S1.

Litchi germplasm resources used in this study.

Additional file 5: Table S2.

Primers used in this study.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ding, F., Li, H., Wang, J. et al. Development of molecular markers based on the promoter difference of LcFT1 to discriminate easy- and difficult-flowering litchi germplasm resources and its application in crossbreeding. BMC Plant Biol 21, 539 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-03309-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-03309-7

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us