Skip to main content
Download PDF

Identification of genes related to tipburn resistance in Chinese cabbage and preliminary exploration of its molecular mechanism

BMC Plant Biology volume 21, Article number: 567 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Tipburn, also known as leaf tip necrosis, is a severe issue in Chinese cabbage production. One known cause is that plants are unable to provide adequate Ca2+ to rapidly expanding leaves. Bacterial infection is also a contributing factor. Different cultivars have varying degrees of tolerance to tipburn. Two inbred lines of Chinese cabbage were employed as resources in this research.

Results

We determined that the inbred line ‘J39290’ was the tipburn resistant material and the inbred line ‘J95822’ was the tipburn sensitive material based on the severity of tipburn, and the integrity of cell membrane structure. Ca2+ concentration measurements revealed no significant difference in Ca2+ concentration between the two materials inner leaves. Transcriptome sequencing technology was also used to find the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of ‘J95822’ and ‘J39290’, and there was no significant difference in the previously reported Ca2+ uptake and transport related genes in the two materials. However, it is evident through DEG screening and classification that 23 genes are highly linked to plant-pathogen interactions, and they encode three different types of proteins: CaM/CML, Rboh, and CDPK. These 23 genes mainly function through Ca2+-CaM/CML-CDPK signal pathway based on KEGG pathway analysis, protein interaction prediction, and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) of key genes.

Conclusions

By analyzing the Ca2+ concentration in the above two materials, the transcription of previously reported genes related to Ca2+ uptake and transport, the functional annotation and KEGG pathway of DEGs, it was found that Ca2+ deficiency was not the main cause of tipburn in ‘J95822’, but was probably caused by bacterial infection. This study lays a theoretical foundation for exploring the molecular mechanism of resistance to tipburn in Chinese cabbage, and has important guiding significance for genetics and breeding.

Peer Review reports

Background

Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis), a member of Cruciferae, has a long history of cultivation and has the laudatory name of “king of vegetables”. In the winter and spring, it is also the most popular vegetable on people’s tables in North and Northeast China, and it has a large planting area. According to statistics, the annual 50 sown area of Chinese cabbage reaches 2.67 million hm2, accounting for 15% of the total sown area of vegetables in the country, with an output value of nearly 60 billion Yuan (RMB) [1, 2]. Today, vast regions of cultivation can be found in Japan, Southeast Asia, Europe, and the United States, and it has become an inseparable delicacy on people’s dinner tables all over the world. People prefer Chinese cabbage because it has a wide range of adaptation, can be widely planted, has rich nutrition, variety diversity, high yield and storage tolerance, and is high in carotenoids, protein, crude fibre, and other nutrients.

Tipburn of Chinese cabbage is a physiological disorder that has gained a lot of attention in recent years. It’s symptom is a dry and yellow edge to the interior leaf at the rosette stage, which wilts in a white band following dehydration, and some young leaves have a dry edge. The typical plant tipburn incidence rate of Chinese cabbage is 10-20%, and in severe circumstances, it can reach as high as 80% [3]. Farmers have suffered significant economic losses as a result of Chinese cabbage tipburn, which is getting increasingly severe. Tipburn starts in the rosette stage and becomes more serious as it progresses to the heading stage [3, 4].

It has always been studied that the occurrence of tipburn is mainly due to calcium deficiency [5, 6]. Some researchers believe that tipburn is caused by a complex interaction of elements such as impaired calcium uptake and transport, an aberrant growing environment, and uncoordinated growth, rather than by a shortage of calcium in the soil [7].

In response to diverse stress signals, Ca2+ homeostasis in the cytosol was significantly altered in plants [8,9,10]. Intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis is controlled by Ca2+ storage and transport system [11]. Ca2+ is mainly stored in plasma membrane, vacuole and endoplasmic reticulum [10]. The most typical Ca2+ transporters are ACA (Autoinhibited Ca2 + −ATPase), CAX (Ca2+/H+ antiporter) located in vacuoles and ECA (Endoplasmic reticulum-bound Ca2 + pump) protein located in endoplasmic reticulum [10, 12, 13].

In Chinese cabbage, seven ECA genes and four CAS (Calcium sensor) genes were discovered, and their expression was influenced by calcium stress, which might be linked to the incidence of tipburn at the seedlings stage [14]. Besides, the expressions of ECA, ACA and CAS in inner, middle and outer leaves of different lines were compared by RT-PCR. The results showed that the lack of calcium transport in the inner leaves is the key to the occurrence of tipburn. Some circRNAs may be involved in the response of plants to calcium deficiency induced tipburn through the circRNA regulation pathway [15]. Su et al. [16] found that BrCRT2 is an important gene for tipburn resistance in Chinese cabbage. Despite the discovery of several genes linked to tipburn resistance in Chinese cabbage, 84 the mechanism of tipburn resistance remains unknown.

At present, in addition to calcium deficiency causing tipburn in Chinese cabbage, it has also been found that pantomime P antoea ananatis can cause bacterial tipburn in Chinese cabbage [17]. Biological characteristics of P.ananatis Y2 strain were analyzed and its whole genome was sequenced, which is helpful to accelerate the study of tipburn in Chinese cabbage, and is of great significance to fully reveal the molecular mechanism of tipburn in Chinese cabbage and to cultivate high quality, high yield and disease resistance Chinese cabbage varieties.

Zhang et al. (1994) [18] found that there were differences in the sensitivity of different varieties of Chinese cabbage to tipburn. Although the resistance of Chinese cabbage to tipburn is determined by genetic factors, it is controlled by polygenes and belongs to quantitative traits [6]. At present, the research on tipburn is mainly focused on field prevention and inducing factors, but there are few reports on the molecular mechanism of the tipburn [19]. This work employed tipburn resistant plants and sensitive inbred lines as materials to uncover and evaluate tipburn related genes in Chinese cabbage in order to systematically understand its molecular mechanism. It has guiding significance and application value in analyzing the molecular mechanism of tipburn response of Chinese cabbage and improving stress resistance.

Results

Phenotypic analysis of two Chinese cabbage inbred lines—‘J95822’ and ‘J39290’

We studied two inbred line i.e.,‘J95822’ and ‘J39290’, to see how Chinese cabbage responded to tipburn. We discovered that ‘J95822’ and ‘J39290’ had similar leaf shape and color in the field by monitoring the phenotypic of two homozygous lines at heading stage. The leaves of ‘J95822’, on the other hand, showed clear tipburn symptoms (Fig. 1A), especially the interior leaves, which had dried out (Fig. 1B), but the leaves of ‘J39290’ did not (Fig. 1C and D). As a result, ‘J95822’ is a tipburn sensitive line, while ‘J39290’ is a tipburn resistant line.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Symptoms observation on tipburn in Chinese cabbage during heading stage. A Top view of inbred line ‘J95822’; B Longitudinal section section of inbred line ‘J95822’; C Top view of inbred line ‘J39290’; D Longitudinal section profile of inbred line ‘J39290’. Bar: 2 cm

Full size image

Incidence rate of tipburn in two Chinese cabbage inbred lines—‘J95822’ and ‘J39290’

We evaluated the overall tipburn incidence of Chinese cabbage varieties ‘J95822’ and ‘J39290’ during the rosette and heading stages, respectively. The results revealed that the overall tipburn incidence of ‘J95822’ was 8.33% in the rosette stage, while that of ‘J39290’ was 0 (Fig. 2). The overall tipburn incidence of ‘J95822’ was 16.67% in the early heading stage, while that of ‘J39290’ was 0. In the late heading stage, the leaf tipburn incidence per plant in ‘J95822’ plants was 100%, while that of ‘J39290’ was 8.33% (Fig. 2). In the late heading stage, the leaf tipburn incidence per plant in ‘J95822’ plants was 100%, while that of ‘J39290’ was 8.33% (Fig. 2). Through the statistics of leaf tipburn incidence per plant, we found that there was no significant difference in the total leaf number between ‘J95822’ and ‘J39290’, both in the range of 24-34 leaves. The number of tipburnd leaves per plant was also counted during the late heading stage. Only 2.15% of the leaves in ‘J39290’ had tipburn symptoms, while 54.19% of the leaves in ‘J95822’ had tipburn symptoms (Fig. 2). We infer that ‘J95822’ is a tipburn sensitive line and ‘J39290’ is a tipburn resistant line based on the aforesaid analysis.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Statistics on the overall tipburn incidence of inbred lines ‘J95822’ and ‘J39290’ at rosette stage, early heading stage, late heading stage and leaf tipburn incidence per plant at late heading stage. The abscissa is the date, the left ordinate is the overall incidence, and the right ordinate is the leaf incidence per plant. Nov. 12, the rosette stage; Nov.27, the early heading stage; Dec.12, the late heading stage. Twelve plants were selected for each variety

Full size image

Microstructure of interior leaves of tipburn sensitive and tipburn resistant Chinese cabbage

We investigated the micro-anatomical structure of the tipburn site (interior leaf) of ‘J95822’ and ‘J39290’, to see if there were any variations in cell structure between tipburn sensitive and resistant Chinese cabbage varieties (Fig. 3A and C). The interior leaf cell structure of ‘J95822’ and ‘J39290’ was essentially the same, but the parenchyma cells of ‘J95822’ had a serious damage phenomenon at the site of onset (Fig. 3B), whereas the vascular bundle sheath of interior leaf of ‘J39290’ was obvious, and the parenchyma cells were regular in shape and uniform in size (Fig. 3D). Therefore, we speculated that the tipburn of Chinese cabbage mainly destroyed the integrity of cell membrane of interior leaves.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Microstructure of interior leaves of tipburn sensitive plant ‘J95822’ and tipburn resistant plant ‘J39290’. A and B cellular structure of tipburn sensitive Chinese cabbage ‘J95822’. C and D cellular structure of tipburn resistant Chinese cabbage ‘J39290’. Figures B and D are local magnification of figures A and C, respectively. PC: parenchyma cell; VBS: vascular bundle sheath. Bar: 500 μm (A, C); 50 μm (B, D)

Full size image

Nutrient analysis in roots and leaves of tipburn sensitive and tipburn resistant Chinese cabbage

Considering ion uptake and transport play an important role in plant resistance to stress, we analyzed the contents of Ca2+, K+, Mg2+ and Na + in roots, leaves of tipburn sensitive ‘J95822’ and tipburn resistant ‘J39290’. The accumulation of K+ in root from ‘J39290’ (56.50-57.80 mg/plant DW) was lower than ‘J95822’ (84.75-98.87 mg/plant DW) (Fig. 4C), but there was no significant difference in interior leaves (Fig. 4D). The accumulation of Mg2+ in the root of ‘J39290’ did not differ significantly from that of ‘J95822’ (Fig. 4C), whereas the accumulation of Mg2+ in the interior leaf of ‘J39290’ was higher than that of ‘J95822’. The Mg2+ concentration in the outer leaves of ‘J39290’ was significantly higher than that of ‘J95822’ (Fig. 4B). The results revealed that between tipburn susceptible and tipburn resistant Chinese cabbage, ion uptake and transport differed. In terms of calcium accumulation, Ca2+ accumulation in roots of ‘J39290’ was 1.46 ~ 2.18 times higher than that of ‘J95822’ (Fig. 4C), and Ca2+ accumulation in interior leaves of ‘J39290’ was 1.25 ~ 2.44 times higher than in interior leaves of ‘J95822’ (Fig. 4D). In terms of Ca2+ concentration, ‘J39290’ increased by 4.94-12.89 mg/g in the outer leaves compared to ‘J95822’ (Fig. 4B), but there was no significant difference in the interior leaves (Fig. 4A). Given that calcium uptake and transport affect plant tipburn, yet there was no significant difference in Ca2+ concentration in the interior leaves of the two inbred lines, we speculate that calcium deficiency is not the primary cause of tipburn, while bacterial tipburn may be present.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Nutrient content of tipburn sensitive plant ‘J95822’ and tipburn resistant plant ‘J39290’. A Nutrient concentration in the interior leaves of tipburn sensitive plants and tipburn resistant plants. B Nutrient concentration in the outer leaves of tipburn sensitive plants and tipburn resistant plants. C Nutrient accumulation in roots of tipburn sensitive plants and tipburn resistant plants. D nutrient accumulation in interior leaves of tipburn sensitive plants and tipburn resistant plants. Each data represents the average from three samples. The error bars represent the SDs. ∗ indicates significance at p < 0.05, ∗ ∗ indicates significance at p < 0.01, NS indicates no significance

Full size image

Transcriptome sequencing of interior leaves of tipburn sensitive and tipburn resistant Chinese cabbage

A total of 42.76 GB clean data was collected from transcriptome sequencing of the interior leaves (6 samples) from ‘J95822’ and ‘J39290’ during the heading stage. Each sample’s clean data totaled 6.24 GB, with Q30 bases of 93.27% and higher (Additional file 1: Table S1).The alignment efficiency of the clean reads with the designated Chinese cabbage genome (Bra Chromosome V1.5) ranged from 85.22 to 88.24% (Additional file 1: Table S2), indicating that the use rate of transcriptome data was extremely high. A total of 42,317 genes, including 2086 novel genes, were found by splicing and functional annotation of mapped data. Through principal component analysis (PCA) of all genes in ‘J95822’ and ‘J39290’, it was found that PCA1 and PCA2 were 87.5 and 11.3%, respectively (Additional file 2: Fig. S1). The biological repeats of each material were significantly clustered together (Additional file 2: Fig. S1), indicating that the transcriptome sequencing results were reliable. In this study, with the tipburn sensitive samples ‘J95822’ as the control, a total of 7145 DEGs were discovered in the tipburn resistance samples ‘J39290’. Volcano plot showed that 3171 genes were up-regulated and 3974 genes were down-regulated (Fig. 5A). Through gene ontology (GO) analysis of all DEGs, they contained three main branches, namely: biological process, molecular functional and cellular component. They were mostly involved in the cellular process, cell, cell membrane components and binding function of biological processes (Fig. 5B).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Screening of DEGs between tipburn sensitive material ‘J95822’ and tipburn resistant material ‘J39290’. A Volcano plot of DEGs. Red dots represent up-regulated DEGs, green dots represent down-regulated DEGs, and black dots represent non-differentially expressed genes. B GO annotation classification statistics of DEGs. The abscissa is the GO classification, the ordinate on the left is the percentage of the number of genes in the total number of genes, and the right is the number of genes

Full size image

Screening of candidate genes related to tipburn

The transcriptome data of the interior leaves of the tipburn resistant plant ‘J39290’ were extracted using the interior leaves of the tipburn sensitive plant ‘J95822’ as a control. Total of 117 DEGs (2% of all DEGs) associated with Ca2+ were found by gene functional annotation, among which there were no previously reported genes associated with Ca2+ uptake and transport (Additional file 1: Table S5). However, 24 genes were shown to be involved in plant-interactions, according to the KEGG enrichment map (Fig. 6A, B). Twenty three of these genes were involved in hypersensitive response, cell wall reinforcement, and stomatal closure, among other functions (Fig. 6C). Seven genes were up-regulated and 16 genes were down-regulated (Table 1; Additional file 1: Table S3), and they encoded three types of proteins: CDPK, Rboh, and CaM/CML (Table 1; Additional file 1: Table S3). We speculated that these genes regulate tipburn resistance via the calcium signal, based on the aforementioned analysis. We predicted that by interacting with pathogens, these genes regulate tipburn resistance so that ‘J39290’ could improve its tipburn resistance.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Screening and analysis of genes related to tipburn. A KEGG enrichment map of 117 tipburn related genes; B KEGG classification map of 117 tipburn related genes; C KEGG pathway of 23 calcium related genes. Genes with blue background indicate that the expression level of genes encoding these proteins are up-regulated and down-regulated. The genes with green background indicate that the expression level of genes encoding these proteins are down-regulated

Full size image
Table 1 Expression information of 23 genes related to tipburn in sensitive and resistant materials
Full size table

qRT-PCR determination of genes related to tipburn

Cluster analysis of the FPKM data of 23 tipburn-related protein genes showed that there was a strong correlation between the biological repeats of tipburn sensitive and tipburn resistant samples (Fig. 7). There were 5 genes that were down-regulated and 2 genes that were up-regulated among the BrCDPK genes, with the log2FC of Bra017707 (BrCDPK7) being − 7.08 and the log2FC of Bra029378 (BrCDPK12) being 2.91. Moreover, BrRboh gene (Gene ID: Bra019189) was significantly down-regulated (Fig. 7B). Among the BrCaM/BrCML genes, there were 10 genes down-regulated and 5 genes up-regulated, of which the log2FC of Bra019554 (BrCML5) gene was 4.10, and the Bra039511 (BrCML43) was − 4.14 (Fig. 7B, Additional file 1: Table S3).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Heat map and cluster analysis of FPKM data of 23 tipburn related protein genes and their correlation with qRT-PCR data. A Heat map and cluster analysis of FPKM data of 7 CDPK protein genes and 1 Rboh protein gene (Gene ID: Bra019189); B Heat map and cluster analysis of FPKM data of CaM/CML protein genes. The value in the heat map indicates the FPKM value of the gene. Three samples of tipburn resistant interior leaves were named A1, A2 and A3 respectively, and three samples of tipburn sensitive interior leaves were named S1, S2 and S3, respectively. C The correlation analysis between FPKM value and qRT-PCR value of 21 tipburn related protein genes. “R2” represented pearson correlation coefficient

Full size image
Fig. 8
figure 8

Interaction map of 23 proteins related to tipburn

Full size image

To validate the transcriptomic data using qRT-PCR, a total 23 candidate genes were selected. The results showed that 6 genes were up-regulated, 16 genes were down-regulated (Additional file 2: Fig. S2), and 1 gene (BrCDPK12-2) was not expressed. In addition, we found that the expression levels of Bra012889 (BrCML41) and Bra003287 (BrCDPK12-1) genes in tipburn resistant samples were 0.2 and 0.23 times that of tipburn sensitive plants, respectively. The expression levels of Bra019554 (BrCML5-1) and Bra025439 (BrCML24) in tipburn resistant samples were 4.45 and 1.17 times higher than those of tipburn sensitive plants, respectively. The pearson correlation coefficient (R2) was used to examine the correlation between transcriptome data and qRT-PCR data, and the results showed that the R2 was 0.81, indicating a positive correlation between the RNA sequencing data and qRT-PCR data (Fig. 7C). Based on the findings, we infer that, in addition to BrCDPK12-2, the other 22 candidate genes are important in tipburn stress.

Interaction analysis of proteins encoded by 23 tipburn candidate genes

The prediction of protein interaction showed that Bra034103 (CML49) did not interact with any proteins, while Bra012889 (CML41), Bra015727 (CML38), Bra015979 (CML26), Bra017355 (CML16) and Bra019503 (CML47) interacted with all CDPK proteins. While, the remaining 9 CaM/CML proteins (Bra019554, Bra023786, Bra025439, Bra027981, Bra028360, Bra032785, Bra035972, Bra039511, Bra033077) interacted with 5 CDPK proteins (Bra002099, Bra003287, Bra009653, Bra013575, Bra017707). All CDPK proteins interact with Rboh proteins. These findings are in line with the KEGG pathway. Based on the findings, we hypothesized that, as compared to the inbred line ‘J95822’, ‘J39290’ may improve tipburn resistance in inner leaves via the Ca2 + −CaM / CML-CDPK signal pathway (Fig. 8).

Discussion

Tipburn, commonly known as skin rot, is a physiological disorder that affects Chinese cabbage during the rosette and heading stages. The majority of the injured leaves are in the middle of the leaf bulb, and an injured leaf can appear in several layers of healthy leaves, lowering the quality of Chinese cabbage significantly [20]. Tipburn is caused by a variety of pathogenic variables, including soil physical and chemical properties, climatic circumstances, fertilizer, and others [20]. Tiburn in Chinese cabbage is a quantitative property controlled by numerous genes, according to new scientific research, and there are some differences in tipburn resistance among varieties [21]. As a result, selecting distinct cultivars to investigate the molecular mechanism of tipburn resistance genes is critical. The inbred lines ‘J95822’ and ‘J39290’ were used as research materials in this study. Through phenotypic observation, it was discovered that the phenotypes of the two varieties were similar (Fig. 1). At the same time, the incidence of tipburn was calculated, and the results showed that the tipburn resistance of ‘J39290’ was stronger than that of ‘J95822’ (Fig. 2). All these provide a good basis for studying the molecular mechanism of tipburn.

The accumulation of Ca2+ in the root of ‘J39290’ was higher than that of ‘J95822’ (Fig. 4C), as was the accumulation of Ca2+ in the interior leaves of ‘J39290’ (Fig. 4D). It was discovered that tipburn is associated to Ca2+ uptake and accumulation, which is in line with previous research [22]. In terms of Ca2+ concentration in interior leaves, there was no significant difference between ‘J39290’ and ‘J95822’ (Fig. 4A), which was not consistent with the previously reported results [23]. The explanation for this is that the concentration of Ca2+ in ‘J95822’ is not the main cause of Chinese cabbage tipburn. Furthermore, the amount of K+ accumulation in ‘J39290’ roots (56.50-57.80 mg/plant DW) was lower than in ‘J95822’ roots (84.75-98.87 mg/plant DW) (Fig. 4C), showing that the roots of ‘J39290’ boosted calcium uptake while decreasing potassium uptake. Tipburn may alter the uptake and distribution of other ions based on the concentration and accumulation of K+, Mg2+, and Na + in the roots, inside leaves, and outer leaves of tipburn sensitive and resistant Chinese cabbage (Fig. 4).

The intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis is controlled by Ca2+ storage and transport system [11]. Studies on Ca2+ transporters have also been reported in detail [10, 12, 13]. ACA4 and ACA11 are mostly expressed in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves and are found in the vacuole membrane.. The experimental results showed that ACA4 and ACA11 genes played an important role in transporting intracellular excess Ca2+ to vacuoles. After ACA4 and ACA11 double gene knockout mutations, scattered disease spots appeared around the leaves, especially the leaf margin [24]. Among the 11 CAX antiporters identified in Arabidopsis thaliana (CAX1-11), only CAX1-4 has the activity of exchanging Ca2+/H+ in vacuoles [25,26,27,28]. CAX2 and CAX4 can transport a series of cations, but do not play a major physiological role in Ca2+ homeostasis [28,29,30]. The double mutation of CAX1/CAX3 showed necrosis of leaf tip and stem tip, and CAX1 and CAX3 antiporter could exchange one fine cytoplasm Ca2+ with two vacuole proton (H) [31]. ECA pumps (ECA1, ECA3 and ECA4) in intima are essential for the balance of Ca2+/Mn2+ between cytoplasm and endoplasmic reticulum [32,33,34]. These results suggest that ACA, CAX and ECA transporters are involved in the process of tipburn induced by Ca2+ deficiency.

Given the discovery of 7 ECA genes and 4 CAS genes in Chinese cabbage, the transcriptional patterns of these genes in the interior leaves of tipburn sensitive and resistant plants were investigated. Among the above 7 ECA genes, Bra018690 (ECA1) was not expressed in the interior leaves, the FPKM of Bra031593 (ECA4) and Bra029645 (ECA4) showed opposite trends in the two materials, and there was no significant difference in the expression of other ECA genes between the two materials (Additional file 1: Table S5). Similarly, the expression levels of Bra013013 (CAS) and Bra003389 (CAS) in tipburn resistant Chinese cabbage plants were substantially greater than those in tipburn sensitive (Additional file 1: Table S5). The remaining CAS genes did not differ significantly between the two materials (Additional file 1: Table S5). The expression data of 7 ECA genes and 4 CAS genes in Chinese cabbage did not match the screening criterion of Fold Change≥2 and FDR < 0.01. As a result, we speculate that these genes aren’t solely responsible for inducing resistance in tipburn-resistant plants. BrCRT2 is an important node gene in the interaction between Ca2+ pathway and tipburn resistance in Chinese cabbage, but we did not find this gene in the all DEGs. Based on the transcriptome sequencing results, we speculate that the plant ‘J39290’ protects the integrity of cell membrane not through calcium uptake and transport, but through other paths.

In this research, 23 tipburn associated genes were discovered using transcriptome analysis of tipburn sensitive and resistant Chinese cabbage (Fig. 6). The usage of qRT-PCR technique was also employed to confirm the accuracy of transcriptome sequencing results (Fig. 7C). According to various functional annotations and KEGG pathway predictions, a total of 23 differentially expressed genes participated plant-pathogen interaction pathway, and they encode three types of proteins: CDPK, Rboh, and CaM/CML proteins (Table 1; Additional file 1: Table S3). These proteins can participate in cell hypersensitivity response, cell wall reinforcement, and stomatal closure. Based on the above analysis, we speculated that the main cause of tipburn in Chinese cabbage ‘J95822’ was bacterial infection rather than lack of elements (calcium, etc.).

Conclusions

We discovered tipburn resistant material ‘J39290’ and tipburn sensitive material ‘J95822’ after investigating the severity of tipburn and cell membrane structural integrity. The transcriptome data of the two samples was evaluated using DEG, GO, KEGG analysis, and protein interaction prediction. The findings revealed that 23 potential genes were detected in the ‘J39290’ inbred line’s tipburn resistance, and that these genes may promote cell integrity via the Ca2 + −CaM / CML-CDPK signal pathway, hence increasing tipburn resistance.

Methods

Plant materials

To explore the molecular mechanism of Chinese cabbage response to tipburn, we selected two inbred lines —‘J95822’ and ‘J39290’ to study. All of them are from the Vegetable Research Institute of Xinxiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

Seeds had been sown in seedlings medium (Metro Mix 350; Sun Gro Horticulture, Agawam, MA, USA) on August 20, 2020, and then cultured in the germination chamber at 26 °C and 70% humidity (16 h light/8 h dark cycle). Thirty plants of each variety were transplanted after one month later, and all plants in the field were managed uniformly in the process of growing. The incidence of tipburn in Chinese cabbage was analyzed at the rosette stage (November 12), the early heading stage (November 27) and the late heading stage (December 12). At the same time, the determination of nutritional elements in samples and the transcriptome sequencing were carried out at the late heading stage (December 12).

Statistical method for the incidence of tipburn

We used “Overall incidence” and “Leaf incidence per plant” as indexes of tipburn to assess the severity of tipburn in Chinese cabbage. Overall incidence: the proportion of plants in one inbred line exhibiting tipburn symptoms to the total number of plants [35]. Leaf incidence per plant is the proportion of tipburn leaves to the total number of leaves of a plant.

Determination method of nutrient content

In the late heading stage, the samples of outer leaves, interior leaves and roots of Chinese cabbage were sampled and the contents of K, Ca, Mg and Na were determined. The specific steps were as follows: (1) the collected samples were first killed at 105 °C, then dried in an oven at 70 °C, and finally crushed with a stainless steel grinder. (2) the dried sample (0.02-0.2 g) was weighed and filtered on the sieve of 0.15 mm. (3) the filtered sample was digested with mixed acid (HNO3: HClO4 = 3: 1), and the digested solution was fixed to 100 mL with water. (4) ICP-AES (Inductively coupled Plasma Emission Spectrometer) was used to determine the concentration of each element.

The method of making leaf slices

To analyze the cellular structure of leaves in Chinese cabbage, we took the interior leaves of tipburn sensitive Chinese cabbage at the late heading stage to make leaf slices, including the critical areas of tipburn and non-tipburn. The same part of the tipburn resistance Chinese cabbage was used as control. The slices were placed in a pre-prepared FAA fixed solution (45% ethanol, 5% glacial acetic acid, 5% formaldehyde), stained with fuchsin (0.5%) and solid green (0.5%) solutions, dehydrated using an ethanol series, and sealed with neutral gum [36]. An OlympicBX51 microscope was used to examine and photograph the cell structure.

Total RNA isolation, RNA-sequencing library construction and transcriptome sequencing

The interior leaves of tipburn resistant and tipburn sensitive Chinese cabbage were used to sequence the transcriptome (3 tipburn resistant samples, namely A1, A2, A3, and 3 tipburn sensitive samples, namely S1, S2, S3). To obtain good quality samples, we used a NanoDrop, a Qubit 2.0 and and an Agilent 2100 to test the purity, concentration and integrity of RNA. The process of library construction was as follows: we first (1) enrich eukaryotic mRNA; with oligo (dT) beads, (2) add fragmentation buffer to mRNA to randomly interrupt, (3) use mRNA as template, synthesize the first cDNA chain with six-base random primers (random hexamers), then add buffer, dNTPs, RNase H and DNA polymerase I to synthesize the second cDNA chain, and purify cDNA by AMPure XP beads. (4) The purified double-stranded cDNA was repaired by terminal repair, a tail was added and connected to the sequencing connector, and then the fragment size was selected by AMPure XP beads. (5) Finally, the cDNA library was obtained by PCR enrichment. The Q-PCR method was used to accurately determine the effective concentration of the library (the effective concentration of the library > 2 nM) to ensure the quality of the library. After passing the warehouse inspection, based on the Sequencing By Synthesis (SBS) technology of synthesis and sequencing, the sequencing was carried out on the Illumina platform.

Sequencing data processing and DEG analysis

The data obtained from transcriptome sequencing were compared with Chinese cabbage genome sequence (Bra Chromosome V1.5) by HISAT2 2.0.4 efficient alignment system [37]. After the completion of the comparative analysis, the reads was assembled by StringTie [38], and compared with the original genome annotation information to find the annotated transcripts and the original unannotated transcripts, so as to explore the transcripts and genes of Chinese cabbage. The excavated genes were compared with NR [39], Swiss-Prot [40], GO [41], COG [42], KOG [43], Pfam [44] and KEGG database [45] by BLAST software [46]. The KEGG Orthology results of the gene were obtained by using KOBAS 2.0 [47]. To obtain gene annotation information, the predicted amino acid sequences were compared with Pfam database [48] by using Hmmer software.

Fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments mapped (FPKM) [49] was used as an index to measure the level of transcript or gene expression. We analyzed the differential expression among the sample groups by DESeq2 [50]. Fold Change ≥2 and FDR (False discovery rate) < 0.01 were selected as screening criteria. The fold change represents the ratio of expression between two groups. The FDR is obtained by correcting the significant difference using the p-value. Pearson correlation coefficient ‘R2’ [51] was used to analyze the correlation between the results of transcriptome sequencing and qRT-PCR.

Verification of transcriptome sequencing results

To verify the reliability of the transcriptome sequencing results, the nucleotide sequences of 23 calcium-related DEGs were selected from the database, and specific primers were designed by Primer 5.0 [52] (Additional file 1: Table S4). Actin (Gene ID: Bra028615) was used as an internal reference. Total RNA was first reverse-transcribed into cDNA using M-MLVRTase cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara, Japan), and then analyzed the relative expression levels of 23 calcium-related DEGs on the ABI 7500 real-time PCR system with the Prime Script RT reagent kit (TaKaRa). The PCR system and PCR reaction conditions were set according to previous studies [53]. There were three biological and three technical replicates for each treatment. The comparative 2-ΔΔCT method [54] was used to analyze the relative expression profiles of genes. Statistical analysis was carried out by one-way ANOVA using SPSS 18.0 software. The data are presented as the mean ± SD. The relative expression levels of genes were demonstrated by HemI software [55].

Analysis of protein interaction of candidate genes related to tipburn

We utilized STRING [56] to construct the DEG interaction network, combining the results of differential expression analysis with the interaction relationship pairings recorded in the database. The protein interaction network was visualized using the Cytoscape software [57].

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the results described in this article were included within the article and its additional file, however, All raw sequence reads have been deposited in NCBI database, and the accession number is PRJNA743576.

References

  1. Zhang FL, Yu SC, Yu YJ, Zhang DS, Zhao YY, Su TB, et al. Research progress on Chinese cabbage genetic breeding during ‘the twelfth five-year plant’ in China. China Vegetables. 2017;3:22–8 (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ma XL. Molecular mechanisim of hydrogen sulfide as gasotransmitter promotes flowering in Chinese cabbage: Shanxi University; 2019. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cui ZY. The cause and control of Chinese cabbage heartburn. Modern Rural Sci Technol. 2019;11:31–2. (In Chinese).

  4. Zhang L, Rong Q. Comprehensive control measures for tipburn of autumn Chinese cabbage. J Changjiang Vegetables. 2019;13:59-60. (In Chinese).

  5. Saure MC. Causes of the tipburn disorder in leaves of vegetables. Scientia Horti. 1998;76:131–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wissemeier AH. Calcium-mangel bei salat (Lactuca sativa L.) und poinsettie (Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd. ex Klotzsch): einfluss von genotyp und umwelt. Verlag Ulrich E. Grauer, Stuttgart; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kuronuma T, Ando M, Watanabe H. Tipburn incidence and Ca acquisition and distribution in Lisianthus (Eustoma grandiflorum (Raf.) Shinn.) cultivars under different Ca concentrations in nutrient solution. Agronomy. 2020;10(2):216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. White PJ, Broadley MR. Calcium in plants. Ann Bot. 2003;92(4):487–511.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dayod M, Tyerman SD, Leigh RA, Gilliham M. Calcium storage in plants and the implications for calcium biofortifcation. Protoplasma. 2010;247:215–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Conn SJ, Gilliham M, Athman A, Schreiber AW, Baumann U, Moller I, et al. Cell-specific vacuolar calcium storage mediated by CAX1 regulates apoplastic calcium concentration, gas exchange, and plant productivity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2012;23(1):240–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Berridge MJ, Bootman MD, Roderick HL. Calcium signalling: dynamics, homeostasis and remodelling. Nature. 2003;4(7):517.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Geisler M, Frangne N, Gomes E, Martinoia E, Palmgren MG. TeACA4 gene of Arabidopsis encodes a vacuolar membrane calcium pump that improves salt tolerance in yeast. Plant Physiol. 2000;124:1814–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Robertson D. Modulating plant calcium for better nutrition and stress tolerance. Int Scholarly Res Notices. 2013;5.

  14. Cheng H. The expression analysis on Ca2+ transport and response genes under calcium deficiency condition in different resistance plant[D] Nanjing Agr U. 2015. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang WH, Wang JL, Wei QZ, Li BY, Zhong XM, Hu TH, et al. Transcriptome-wide identification and characterization of circular RNAs in leaves of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis) in response to calcium deficiency-induced tip-burn. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):14544.

  16. Su TB, Li PR, Wang HP, Wang WH, Zhao XY, Yu YJ, et al. Natural variation in a calreticulin gene causes reduced resistance to Ca2+ deficiency-induced tipburn in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis). Plant Cell Environ. 2019;42(11).

  17. Zhang Y, Zhang S, Li HY, Wang FD, Gao JW. Biological characteristics and whole genome sequence analysis of Pantoea ananatis which causing Chinese cabbage tipburn. Shandong Agric Sci. 2020;52(09):1–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang FL, Xu JB, Fei TJY. Screening methods of resistance to tipburn (calcium deficiency) in Chinese cabbage. Acta Agric Boreali Sin. 1994;9(3):127–8 (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang H, Zhao X, Liu L. Study on current development in tipburn of Chinese cabbage. Tianjin Agr Sci. 2009;15(6):47–8 (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Guo JF. Causes and control of dry heartburn in Chinese cabbage. Beijing Agr. 2000;10:18 (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yang FC, Wang ZQ, Zhang L, Liu F. Occurrence and control of tipburn disease of Chinese cabbage. Seed World. 2015;08:41 (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yuan WL, Yuan SY, Liu ZX, Chen LF, Qiu ZM. Effect of foliar application of CaCl2 on lettuce growth and calcium concentrations with organic and onventional fertilization. Hortscience. 2018;53(6):891–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ahmed HA, Tong Y, Yang QC. Lettuce plant growth and tipburn occurrence as affected by airflow using a multi-fan system in a plant factory with artificial light. J Therm Biol. 2020.

  24. Boursiac Y, Sang ML, Romanowsky S, Blank R, Sladek C, Harper CJF. Disruption of the vacuolar calcium-ATPases in Arabidopsis results in the activation of a salicylic acid-dependent programmed cell death pathway. Plant Physiol. 2010;154(3):1158–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Mäser P, Thomine S, Schroeder JI, Ward JM, Guerinot ML. Phylogenetic relationships within cation transporter families of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2001;126(4):1646–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Hirschi KD. Expression of Arabidopsis CAX1 in tobacco: altered calcium homeostasis and increased stress sensitivity. Plant Cell. 1999;11:2113–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao J, Barkla BJ, Marshall J, Pittman JK, Hirschi KD. The Arabidopsis CAX3 mutants display altered salt tolerance, phsensitivity and reduced plasma membrane H+-ATPase activity. Planta. 2008;227:659–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hirschi KD, Korenkov V, Wilganowski NL, Wagner GJ. Expression of Arabidopsis CAX2 in tobacco: altered metal accumulation and increased manganese tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2000;124:125–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Pittman JK, Shigaki T, Marshall JL, Morris JL, Cheng NH, Hirschi KD. Functional and regulatory analysis of the Arabidopsis thaliana CAX2 cation transporter. Plant Mol Biol. 2004;56:959–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cheng N, Pittman JK, Shigaki T, Hirschi KD. Characterization of CAX4, an Arabidopsis H+/cation antiporter. Plant Physiol. 2002;128:1245–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Cheng NH, Pittman JK, Shigaki T, Lachmansingh J, LeClere S, Lahner B, et al. Functional association of Arabidopsis CAX1 and CAX3 is required for normal growth and ion homeostasis. Plant Physiol. 2005;138:2048–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Sze H. Regulating intracellular calcium in plants: from molecular genetics to physiology. College Park: University of Maryland; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mills RF, Doherty RL, Lopez-Marques T. ECA3, a golgi-localized P2A-type ATPase, plays a crucial role in manganese nutrition in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007;146:116–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu ZY, Liang F, Hong BM, Yong JC, Sussman MR, Harper JF, et al. An endoplasmic reticulum-bound Ca2+/Mn2+ pump, ECA1, supports plant growth and confers tolerance to Mn2+ stress. Plant Physiol. 2002;130:128–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Kuronuma T, Watanabe Y, Ando M, Watanabe H. Tipburn severity and calcium distribution in lisianthus (Eustoma grandiflorum (Raf.) Shinn.) cultivars under different relative air humidity conditions. Agronomy. 2018;8:218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ganino T, Rapoport HF, Fabbri A. Anatomy of the olive inflorescence axis at flowering and fruiting. Sci Horticulturae. 2011;129(2):213–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods. 2015;12(4):357–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Pertea M, Pertea GM, Antonescu CM, Chang TC, Mendell JT, Salzberg SL. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33(3):290–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Deng YY, Li JQ, Wu SF, Zhu YP, Chen YW, He FC. Integrated nr database in protein annotation system and its localization. Comput Eng. 2006;32(5):71–4 (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rolf A, Amos B, Wu CH, Barker WC, Brigitte B, Serenella F, et al. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:115–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000;25(1):25–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA. The COG database: a tool for genome scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):33–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Koonin EV, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, Krylov DM, Makarova KS, et al. A comprehensive evolutionary classification of proteins encoded in complete eukaryotic genomes. Genome Biol. 2004;5(2):R7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Finn RD, Bateman A, Clements J, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, et al. Pfam: the protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(1):222–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Minoru K, Susumu G, Shuichi K, Yasushi O, Masahiro H. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:277–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Alejandro AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Webb M, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25(17):3389–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Xie C, Mao XZ, Huang JJ, Ding Y, Wu JM, Dong S, et al. Kobas 2.0: a web server for annotation and identification of enriched pathways and diseases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:316–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Eddy SR. Profile hidden markov models. Bioinformatics. 1998;14(9):755–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Florea L, Song L, Salzberg SL. Thousands of exon skipping events differentiate among splicing patterns in sixteen human tissues. F1000 Res. 2013;2:188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Schulze SK, Kanwar RG, Lzenleuchter M, Therneau TM, Beutler AS. SERE: single-parameter quality control and sample comparison for RNA-Seq. BMC Genomics. 2012;13(1):524.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhai ZH, Chen XN, Wang J. Primer design with primer premier 5.0. Northwest Med Educ. 2008;16(4):695-8.

  53. Yuan JP, Liu TK, Yu ZH, Li Y, Ren HB, Hou XL, et al. Genome-wide analysis of the chinese cabbage IQD gene family and the response of BrIQD5 in drought resistance. Plant Mol Biol. 2019;99(6):603–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Livakl KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Deng WK, Wang YB, Liu ZX, Cheng H, Xue Y. HemI: a toolkit for illustrating heatmaps. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e111988.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Robasky K, Lewis NE, Church GM. The role of replicates for error mitigation in next-generation sequencing. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;15(1):56-62.

  57. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13(11):2498–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was mainly funded by the Science and Technology Program of Henan Province (212102110429), the Scientific Research Foundation for High-level Talent (103010620001/015 and 2017034). Funding body have no role in the study design, data collection, analysis and manuscript writing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, 453003, China

    Jingping Yuan, Huaixia Zhang, Feifei Pan, Chunhui Wu & Qingfei Li

  2. Henan Engineering Research Center of the Development and Utilization of Characteristic Horticultural Plants, Xinxiang, 453003, China

    Jingping Yuan, Huaixia Zhang, Feifei Pan, Chunhui Wu & Qingfei Li

  3. School of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, 453003, China

    Changwei Shen

  4. Vegetable Research Institute of Xinxiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fifty Meters Southwest of the Intersection of Xiner Street and Rongxiao East Road, Hongqi District, Xinxiang City, 453003, Henan Province, China

    Ranghua Yuan, Yan Xiao, Xiaoling Wang, Jingyun Yuan & Xuesheng Liu

Authors
  1. Jingping Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Changwei Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ranghua Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Huaixia Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yan Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiaoling Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Feifei Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Chunhui Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Qingfei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jingyun Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Xuesheng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.Y.(Jingping Yuan), C.S. and R.Y. conceived and designed the research. H.Z. and Y.X. provided the microstructure of interior leaves of Chinese cabbage. X.W., F.P. and C.W. provided the statistical results of tipburn. Q.L., J.Y. (Jingyun Yuan) and X.L. contributed the prediction software. J.Y.(Jingping Yuan), C.S. and R.Y wrote the original draft of the manuscript. H.Z revised the article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ranghua Yuan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

The data statistics of transcriptome sequencing. Table S2. Sequence alignment results between sample sequencing data and selected reference genome. Table S3. FPKM values and functional annotations of 23 genes involved in hypersensitive response, cell wall reinforcment and stomatal closure. Table S4. List of primer sequences used for qRT-PCR analysis of the tipburn related genes. Table S5. Transcriptional profile data of 7 ECA genes and 4 CAS genes in Chinese Cabbage.

Additional file 2: Figure S1.

Principal component analysis of all genes in tipburn sensitive samples and tipburn resistant samples. Figure S2. FPKM and qRT-PCR values of 21 tipburn related protein genes.

Additional file 3.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuan, J., Shen, C., Yuan, R. et al. Identification of genes related to tipburn resistance in Chinese cabbage and preliminary exploration of its molecular mechanism. BMC Plant Biol 21, 567 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-03303-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-03303-z

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us