Skip to main content

Cloning and characterization of KoOsmotin from mangrove plant Kandelia obovata under cold stress

Abstract

Background

Low temperature is a major abiotic stress that seriously limits mangrove productivity and distribution. Kandelia obovata is the most cold-resistance specie in mangrove plants, but little is known about the molecular mechanism underlying its resistance to cold. Osmotin is a key protein associated with abiotic and biotic stress response in plants but no information about this gene in K. obovata was reported.

Results

In this study, a cDNA sequence encoding osmotin, KoOsmotin (GenBank accession no. KP267758), was cloned from mangrove plant K. obovata. The KoOsmotin protein was composed of 221 amino acids and showed a calculated molecular mass of 24.11 kDa with pI 4.92. The KoOsmotin contained sixteen cysteine residues and an N-terminal signal peptide, which were common signatures to most osmotins and pathogenesis-related 5 proteins. The three-dimensional (3D) model of KoOsmotin, contained one α-helix and eleven β-strands, was formed by three characteristic domains. Database comparisons of the KoOsmotin showed the closest identity (55.75%) with the osmotin 34 from Theobroma cacao. The phylogenetic tree also revealed that the KoOsmotin was clustered in the branch of osmotin/OLP (osmotin-like protien). The KoOsmotin protein was proved to be localized to both the plasma membrane and cytoplasm by the subcellular localization analysis. Gene expression showed that the KoOsmotin was induced primarily and highly in the leaves of K. obovata, but less abundantly in stems and roots. The overexpressing of KoOsmotin conferred cold tolerance in Escherichia coli cells.

Conclusion

As we known, this is the first study to explore the osmotin of K. obovata. Our study provided valuable clues for further exploring the function of KoOsmotin response to stress.

Background

As an important marine wetland ecosystem, mangroves was mainly distributed in tropic and subtropic estuaries, which usually experienced variable and complex abiotic stresses during their growth and development [1, 2]. Kandelia obovata is the most cold-resistance species in mangrove plants. Studies have shown that K. obovata utilized diverse physiological and structural mechanisms for rapid response to multiple stresses, such as cold, salinity, drought and water logging [3, 4]. As a multifunctional protein, osmotin played as a key regulator in response to abiotic stresses [5, 6]. Therefore, among the cold stress-response genes in our previous study [7], the osmotin gene might be one of the most potent candidates for improving K. obovata stress-resistance. However, there is little literature about osmotin or osmotin-like protein (OLP) in K. obovata or other mangrove plants so far.

Osmotin is a member of the pathogenesis related-5 (PR-5) protein family. PR-5 generally include proteins related to thaumatin, zeamatin and osmotin, and is recognized with antifungal activity [8]. Osmotin was first isolated from tobacco cell cultures [9], and then the gene encoding osmotin was cloned [10]. As a pre-protein, osmotin was considered to be synthesized inside the vacuole with a molecular weight of 26.4 kDa, whereas the mature form was 24 kDa [11]. Osmotin generally contains sixteen conserved cysteine residues that are distributed throughout the protein and form eight disulfide bridges [12]. These conserved cysteine residues can help to stabilize the molecule, accurate folding and prevent protease degradation [13]. Osmotin is made up of three motifs (Domain I-III) that show similar folding in other PR-5 proteins such as thaumatin and zeamatin [12]. Osmotin is a secretory protein that does not contain introns, DNA-binding motifs and glycosylation locations [14], however, it generally contains a C-terminal polypeptide extension, which is necessary for localization of vacuole [15].

Although intensive studies have been conducted to the defense function of osmotin, the intricate interplay of osmotin in gene regulation was still unclear. Primarily, many studies hypothesized that osmotin might be a transcription factor to regulate key genes in response to abiotic and biotic stresses [16, 17]. However, later evidence had ruled out this hypothesis by the fact that osmotin did not contain any DNA-binding motifs [14]. Besides, the osmotin was also shown to activate mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), which was fundamental to most signaling and regulatory processes [18]. Consequently, researchers recently suggested that osmotin was the key regulator mediating plant in response to various stresses [19]. Furthermore, osmotin played essential roles in protecting native protein structures and repairing denatured proteins [20]. Under salinity and drought stresses, osmotin showed the ability of maintaining cellular osmolarity by compartmentalization of solutes or by structural and metabolic changes [21]. In Petunia hybrida, osmotin was induced by several apparently unrelated environmental signals, illustrating its essential complexities of gene expression [22]. Osmotins have been characterized from diverse plant species and were induced by biotic and abiotic stresses [22,23,24]. Over-expression of osmotin genes in transgenic plants can enhance tolerance against stresses including cold, drought, high-salinity and some combinations of them [19, 25,26,27]. In olive plant, overexpression of osmotin showed multiple effects on Ca2+ signaling, cytoskeleton dynamics and programmed cell death [28]. In addition, combined overexpression of osmotin and chitinase genes has enhanced antifungal activity in transgenic rice [29]. Researches also supported that osmotin played orchestrated activities with other cold-related genes in plants [25, 30].

A partial nucleotide sequence (Ko3113) showing high homology with osmotin was isolated from the cDNA library of K. obovata in our previous study [7]. Here, we further cloned and characterized the full-length of this gene, and named it KoOsmotin. The expression patterns of the gene in plant systems (roots, stems and leaves) under cold stress were performed. The subcellular localization of KoOsmotin was determined by expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged KoOsmotin in transgenic tobacco plant. Furthermore, function analysis of cold tolerance was carried out by overexpressing KoOsmotin in E. coli cells. This study will provide a good start for KoOsmotin in stress defense in K. obovata, and also help to improve the mechanism of stress resistance in mangrove plants.

Results

Isolation and structural analysis of the KoOsmotin from K.obovata

An osmotin cDNA sequence from K.obovata, designated as KoOsmotin (GenBank accession no. KP267758), was isolated by SMART™ RACE cDNA amplification. The nucleotide sequence of KoOsmotin was 1126 bp, which contained a 666 bp open reading frame (ORF) encoding a deduced protein length of 221 amino acids. The ORF started at the ATG initiation codon at position 196, and terminated at the TAG terminator codon at position 861. The calculated molecular weight and pI of the putative KoOsmotin protein were 24.11 kDa and 4.92, respectively. The amino acid composition analysis showed that KoOsmotin contained high content of Gly (8.6%), Ser (8.6%), Cys (7.7%), Ala (6.3%), Thr (6.3%), Asn (6.3%), and Val (5.9%), while that Trp occupied the lowest (1.4%) portion. Secondary structure analysis indicated that the KoOsmotin included 9.05% α-helix, 28.96% extended strand, 4.07% β-turn and 57.92% random coil (distributed details were shown in Fig. 1). The KoOsmotin included 19 negatively charged residues (Asp and Glu) and 13 positively charged residues (Arg and Lys), which was accordant with negatively charged on most surface of KoOsmotin (Fig. 2B). Besides, predicted grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY) of KoOsmotin was − 0.158. Since a negative GRAVY value always showed the hydrophilic nature of proteins, indicating KoOsmotin was a hydrophilic prtoein. TMpred prediction analysis showed that KoOsmotin had a transmembrane helix (residues 17–33). The KoOsmotin also contained two conserved residues (Asp121, and Asp202), which will form acidic cleft areas in the structure (Fig. 2B). In addtion, KoOsmotin has the conserved characters of an osmotin, such as no clear glycosylation locations, no introns, no DNA-binding motifs and no allergenic motifs. The results have been consistent with previous reports about osmotin [14].

Fig. 1
figure1

Sequence alignment of KoOsmotin and other well-studied plant PR-5 proteins. Only the complete published sequences were used. Identical and similar amino acids among PR-5 proteins were colored dark and light gray, respectively. A cleavage site in KoOsmotin was indicated by a red arrowhead on the N-terminus. Predicted α-helix and β-strand were indicated above the sequences in dark boxes and in white wide arrows, respectively. Conserved positions containing five amino acids of the central cleft were labeled by red triangles. The sixteen conserved cysteine residues, possibly involved in the formation of disulfide-bridges in PR-5 proteins, were highlighted by yellow shadows. The N- and C-terminal elongations, predicted as signal peptide responsible for extracellular secretion and for vacuolar location, respectively, were indicated with blue lines. Sequences boxed in red dotted line showed the thaumatin motif G-x-G/F-x-C-x-T/S-G/A-D-C-x-G/Q-x-x-x-C, which was family signature in PR-5 proteins. The domain II and domain III in the 3D structures were indicated by green and orange boxes under the sequences, respectively

Fig. 2
figure2

Prediction of 3D structure of KoOsmotin and comparison with its template CpOsmotin. The 3D models of KoOsmotin and its template (CpOsmotin, SMTL id: 4l2j.1) were produced by the homology modeling SWISS-MODEL. A. Pictures are predicted ribbon structures of KoOsmotin and its template, with α-helix (red) and β-strand (yellow), random coil (white). Three domains of KoOsmotin were indicated by red ellipses (domain I, amino acids1–68,102–142, 207–221. domain II, amino acids 143–206. domain III, amino acids 69–101). The three domains were similar in the 3D topology with other PR-5 proteins. B. View of the surface topology of KoOsmotin (left) and its template (right) showing the distribution of the electrostatic potentials. Protein surface was colored according to areas charged positively (blue), negatively (red) and neutrally (white). The acidic cleft was indicated by a black arrowhead. C. Figures are predicted trace structures of KoOsmotin and CpOsmotin and their superimposition

The BLASTx search on the NCBI database indicated that the KoOsmotin showed the greatest similarity to osmotin 34 (GenBank accession no. EOY24661.1) from Theobroma cacao [31], with 55.75% amino acid identity in 100% coverage. The BLAST search aslo revealed that the amino acid sequence of KoOsmotin had high similarity to some PR-5 proteins, such as thaumatin and thaumatin-like proein (TLP). Thus, a multiple sequences alignment of amino acids sequences was performed to compare KoOsmotin with other well-studied PR-5 proteins, including osmotin [22, 31], osmotin-like protein (OLP) [32, 33], zeamatin [34], zeamatin-like protein (ZLP) [35], thaumatin [36] and TLP [37]. Although the alignment of KoOsmotin with these eight well-characterized PR-5 proteins revealed similarity up to 52.9%, the KoOsmotin contained the characteristic sequences of osmotin or PR-5 proteins (Fig. 1). Motif Scan analysis showed that KoOsmotin contained a very conserved typical motif (residues 27–221) that belonged to thaumatin family. A special fingerprint (residues 77–92), G-x-G/F-x-C-x-T/S-G/A-D-C-x-G/Q-x-x-x-C, so-called namely thaumatin motif, was found in KoOsmotin (Fig. 1). This thaumatin motif were highly conserved in osmotins and other PR-5 proteins [38, 39]. Moreover, KoOsmotin contained sixteen cysteine residues and formed eight disulfide bridges. The disulfide bridges were deemed to assist the stabilization of protein molecules and allows for accurate folding [12]. All the sixteen cysteine residues present in KoOsmotin were highly conserved in osmotin and other PR-5 proteins (Fig. 1). Similar to these proteins, KoOsmotin included a signal peptide for secretion near the N-terminus (residues 1–20) and a cleavage site (Fig. 1). Although a C-terminal domain is always present in osmotin and PR-5 proteins [40], the KoOsmotin lacked C-terminal polypeptide, which was also absent in some osmotins and other PR-5 proteins (Fig. 1). From these results, the KoOsmotin was identified as a member of osmotins, belonging to the PR-5 proteins family, which was involved in plant defense against pathogens [41].

Three-dimensional models of KoOsmotin

Tertiary structures of KoOsmotin was predicted by homology modeling SWISS-MODEL [42]. The KoOsmotin showed the highest model homology (58.08%) with the template (Osmotin: antifungal laticifer protein, SMTL id: 4l2j.1.A), CpOsmotin, from Calotropis procera [43], and other TLPs (data not shown). Since formation of 3D model requires 50% similarity between compared principle amino acids sequences [44], indicating the 3D model of KoOsmotin was reasonable and receivable. The homology modeling revealed that the structure of KoOsmotin was composed of three domains, which were common in PR-5 proteins. The 3D model of KoOsmotin contained one α-helix, eleven β-strands and some random coils, which further formed three characteristic domains: “domain I” (residues 1–68, 102–142, 207–221) included eleven β-strands, in the form of a compacted sandwich, “domain II” (residues 143–206) contained one α-helix and “domain III” (residues 69–101) comprised two single loops (Fig. 2A). Domains I and II form an acidic cleft in the KoOsmotin (Fig. 2B). Study reported that many variations were presented in domain-II among osmotins [8]. However, the obvious difference between KoOsmotin and its template CpOsmotin was domain I. The skeletal differences showed variability and were found as altered loop orientations (residues 109–112, 132–137) in domain I (Fig. 2C). As an acidic PR-5 protein, KoOsmotin had widespread negative areas, in particular, the molecular surface of KoOsmotin was almost charged negatively. The distribution of the electrostatic potentials of KoOsmotin was obviously different from its template CpOsmotin. (Fig. 2B). These differences in the skeletal basis and in the surface electrostatic potential, possibly involved in stress-resistance, might be decisive for the specific interaction and activities between PR-5 proteins.

Phylogenetic relationship of KoOsmotin

Osmotins have been characterized in many plants. Thus, many partial and complete sequences of osmotins are available in the NCBI database. The NCBI database indicated that the KoOsmotin showed homology with osmotin and some other PR-5 proteins, such as thaumatin and TLP. To clarify the evolutionary relationships of KoOsmotin with other PR-5 proteins, the phylogenetic tree was constructed. The 33 homologues of PR-5 proteins from various plants were used as the basis for the tree. The overall phylogenetic tree was consisted of three major clusters, osmotin/OLP, zeamatin/ ZLP, thaumatin/TLP, each containing proteins with relatively high identity. The cluster groups were generally well-supported by the bootstrap values. The phylogenetic tree showed that KoOsmotin had the close genetic relationship to the supported clade of osmotin/OLP, closest with osmotin 34 from T. cacao (Fig. 3), thus further demonstrating that the KoOsmotin was a member of osmotins. The phylogenetic analysis also indicated that PR-5 proteins from the same species had considerable variations, such as Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa. The evolutionary analysis indicated that the PR-5 protein family was highly divergent, which confirmed PR-5 gene family was an ancient multigene family conserved in plants [45].

Fig. 3
figure3

Phylogenetic relationship between KoOsmotin and other plant PR-5 proteins. The entire tree including 33 amino acid sequences, which were obtained from the NCBI database with accession number indicated. The red trilateral indicated the KoOsmotin. This tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining method with 1000 bootstrap replication. The scale indicated the branch length

Subcellular localization of KoOsmotin in tobacco epidermal cells

According to the online prediction tools, Cell-Ploc 2.0 and Softberry, the KoOsmotin was predicted to be localized to cytoplasm and vacuole, respectively. To further validate the subcellular localization of KoOsmotin in plants, the fluorescence-tagged 35S-KoOsmotin-GFP was generated and transformed into N. benthamiana epidermis cells. As shown in Fig. 4, the fluorescence signal of 35S-KoOsmotin-GFP was accumulated heavily around the cell borders with spotted distribution, and diffused weakly in cytoplasm of the host plant cells. As a secretory and mature protein, the KoOsmotin presented in the cytoplasm might be secreted from vacuole. However, in N. benthamiana epidermal cells whereas expressing only the empty vector, the fluorescence was observed exclusively on the plasma membrane with a linear distribution, and none of them was localized to cytoplasm (Fig. 4). These results indicated that the KoOsmotin was localized to both the plasma membrane and cytoplasm where they might fulfill different functions. Osmotin has also been confirmed to be localized to the plasma membrane in previous study [19].

Fig. 4
figure4

Subcellular localization of KoOsmotin in N. benthamiana epidermal cells. Transient KoOsmotin expression was visualized by GFP fluorescence. The leaf tissue overexpressing 35S-KoOsmotin-GFP and only 35S-GFP (control) were imaged by confocal microscop. The bar in the lower right corner of these images indicates 10 μm

Gene expression of KoOsmotin in K. obovata induced by cold stress

To determine the expression patterns of KoOsmotin induced by cold stress in whole plant, the levels of KoOsmotin transcripts in leaves, stems and roots were examined. Total RNA was isolated from various tissues of K. obovata seedlings after cold stimulation. The real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) results revealed that gene expression of KoOsmotin was induced highly in the leaves under cold stress, but lower in the stems and roots (Fig. 5). Although the KoOsmotin gene responded positively or negatively at some time points, the expression patterns of KoOsmotin showed similar expression tendency in leaves and roots. In leaves, the expressions of KoOsmotin were induced after the initiation of cold stimulation and stimulated to the top (31.83-fold) at 15 d, but sharply decreased at 20 d. Similar tendency was present in roots. The highest expression level (9.24-fold) of KoOsmotin was also observed at 15 d, and rapidly induced at 20 d in roots. The difference between them reflected that the expression level at 20 d was still much higher (13.44-fold) than the control (0 d) in the leaf, but in root, the level was much lower (0.08-fold) than its control. Interestingly, in the stems, the amount of KoOsmotin transcripts was progressively increased with the extension time after cold stimulation, and reached the peak (13.86-fold) at 20 d. Noticeably, the amounts of KoOsmotin expression were all induced to a small extent at first 7 d, but sharply increased to substantial accumulation after 15 d among in both leaves, stems and roots, respectively. These results indicated that the KoOsmotin responded positively to cold stress at late phases in different tissues, especially in leaves, where photosynthesis takes place. This implied that KoOsmotin gene might be an important part of the signaling networks that K. obovata replying to cold stress.

Fig. 5
figure5

Expression analysis of the KoOsmotin transcripts in K. obovata under cold stress. Types of tissues were indicated. The relative expression levels of KoOsmotin were normalized by the expression of reference gene, Ko18S. Values represented means of three biological replicates. Error bars indicated the standard deviations (p values and were calculated based on Student’s t test. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001)

Overexpression of KoOsmotin enhances cold tolerance in transformed E. coli

To investigate the functional role of KoOsmotin in cold stress tolerance, the KoOsmotin was cloned and overexpressed in E. coli. Transformed E. coli cells with KoOsmotin-pET28a were generated to test the cold-resistance of KoOsmotin. Under optimum condition (37 °C), the E. coli cells transformed with KoOsmotin-pET28a showed slightly weaker growth than the control (Fig. 6). However, among all the different cold treatments (5 °C, 15 °C, 25 °C), the E. coli cells transformed with KoOsmotin-pET28a exhibited significantly enhanced growth when compared with the control (Fig. 6). These results indicated that overexpressing KoOsmotin could confer the cold resistance for E. coli and help to increase the growth of E. coli under cold stress. Previous studies have proved that overexpressing osmotin gene could help to enhance cold tolerance in transgenic plants [19, 27]. Thus, we could infer that overexpressing KoOsmotin might confer cold-resistance in transgenic plants. Using E. coli or other microorganism to analyze the function of plant genes had been adapted in previous studies [46,47,48,49]. In this study, the functional analysis of KoOsmotin using E. coli might be used to predict its tolerance in transgenic plants. This is only the start for the function of the KoOsmotin in cold-resistance, further investigations are needed to be performed.

Fig. 6
figure6

Cold tolerance analysis of E. coli transformed with KoOsmotin. The E. coli cells was spotted onto LB agar medium. Since the optimal cultured temperature for E. coli was 37 ℃, the cold treatments were performed under 5, 15 and 25 °C, respectively. The four concentration gradients of E. coli cell suspension were shown above the figure

Discussion

In this study, a cold-inducible osmotin gene encoding an acidic PR-5 protein, designated as KoOsmotin, was identified from K. obovata. We characterized this gene at structural and transcriptional levels, as well as its subcellular localization. Furthermore, we verified the cold resistance of KoOsmotin in E. coli cells. Usually, the tertiary structure of osmotin was homologous to thaumatin, zeamatin and TLP [45]. Consistent with this, the KoOsmotin showed the highest similarity with osmotin, followed with thaumatin or TLP according to the NCBI database and Swiss Model search. Generally, osmotin and thaumatin resembled each other on the basis of their structure, molecular weight and their conserved disulfide bonds. Besides, osmotin was made up of three domains that shows similar folding with thaumatin and zeamatin [12]. The result of phylogenetic tree in this study further confirmed the close relationship among these three proteins. However, the thaumatin protein tasted sweet, whereas osmotin does not have a sweet taste [8].

In this study, the predicted molecular weight of KoOsmotin was 24.11 kDa, which consistent with precious study [11], indicating KoOsmotin was a mature protein. A C-terminal domain is always supposed to be present in osmotin and PR-5 proteins [40]. Nevertheless, the sequence of KoOsmotin lacked the C-terminal polypeptide, which was also absent in some other osmotins, originally purified as a mature protein from the healthy leaves [31]. Some other PR-5 proteins similar with no C-terminal elongation were also found in zeamatin [34], ZLP [35, 50, 51], TLP [38, 52] and OLP [33]. Plant osmotins have been reported to be localized on different cellular compartments, including plasma membrane, vacuole, chloroplast and endoplasmic reticulum [19]. The bioinformatic tools predicted that KoOsmotin was localized to cytoplasm or vacuole or extracellular. Further evidence performed by confocal microscope analysis revealed that KoOsmotin was mainly localized to plasma membrane, which was consistent with osmotin, TlOsm, from Tripogon loliiformis [19]. However, the TlOsm possessed a C-terminal elongation, which was always considered to be necessary for vacuolar targeting [40]. Besides, many PR-5 proteins lacking the C-terminal elongation but with the N-terminal signal peptide only, like KoOsmotin here, were generally thought to be secreted into the extracellular matrix [33, 50], and were localized in the apoplastic space of plant [38]. The truth is that the studies performed for subcellular localization by confocal microscope showed different phenomena. Thus, an osmotin may concurrently localize to multiple cellular compartments. TMpred analysis predicted a transmembrane fragment in KoOsmotin, suggesting this region was responsible for the plasma membrane localization of the KoOsmotin. It is always accepted that plasma membrane generally contains proteins that are fundamental for stress-signal perception and signal transduction into downstream genes. Previous studies showed that osmotin gene was likely to be upstream gene and involved in stress signal transduction [14, 22, 30, 40, 53]. This suggested that the KoOsmotin may function as stress-responder on plasma membrane and play a key role in regulating downstream genes under stress.

KoOsmotin model contained an acidic cleft between the domains I and II. This acidic cleft was supposed to determine PR-protein specificity to their target receptors or ligands for an antifungal activity, whereas no antifungal thaumatin had a basic cleft [12, 45]. The acidic cleft regions of KoOsmotin were essential for antifungal activity because of five amino residues (Arg64, Gln104, Gly116, Asp121 and Asp202) (Fig. 1). These amino residues were assumed to be responsible for topology and surface electrostatic potential around the cleft. In KoOsmotin, three of five acidic residues (Arg64, Asp121 and Asp202) were conserved in other PR-5 proteins. The other two neutral and hydrophilic residues (Gln104 and Gly116) of KoOsmotin were replaced by Glu and Asp, respectively, which existed in most PR-5 proteins. The two acidic residues (Glu and Asp) were also replaced in a few PR-5 proteins [13]. In K. obovata, the two amino acids (Gln104 and Gly116) of KoOsmotin were different from most plant PR-5 proteins, might indicating the special stress-adaption to tidal area environment that K.obovata growing up. As a secreted protein, the results implied that KoOsmotin might possess special antifungal activity, which help K.obovata plant to grow in the harsh natural habitats.

The RT-qPCR results revealed that gene expression of KoOsmotin was highly induced in the leaves, but lower in the stems and roots. Besides, the expression patterns of KoOsmotin were not synchronized in the roots and stems. It was clear that the expression of KoOsmotin exhibited tissue-specific expression, which were also observed in other osmotin/OLP genes. In Petunia hybrida, the osmotin amounts were high accumulated in roots but slightly in stems and leaves [22]. The tobacco osmotin was mainly induced in flower, but not in shoots after wounding [54]. In the case of soybean, the GmOLPb gene was highly induced in leaves but lower in the stem by methyl jasmonate stimulation [38]. Previous studies showed that osmotin has the ability to protect chlorophyll and photosynthetic machinery, prevent reactive oxygen species accumulation and stimulate more proline accumulation [5, 16, 55]. The amounts of KoOsmotin expression were all induced to a small extent at first 7 d, and the expression levels in leaves were higher than in stems and roots. Thus, it can be concluded that KoOsmotin would be released into the extracellular space and then function in the defensive systems to protect K. obovata cells (mainly in leaves) in the early phase of cold stress. Cold stress is usually accompanied by dehydration and osmotic imbalance with time extending. Studies have certified that osmotin had a function in osmoregulation under stress and had adapted to low osmotic potential environments [14, 24, 56]. The expression levels of KoOsmotin were increased to substantial accumulation after 15 d under cold stress in among leaves, stems and roots. Therefore, it came to infer that KoOsmotin might function to accumulate abundantly in the late phase of cold treatment to protect K. obovata against the imbalance and impart tolerance to cold stress.

In addition, it was worth mention that the expressions of KoOsmotin were increased highly at 15 d under cold stress in both leaves and roots. However, their expressions were both decreased rapidly at 20 d, specially very low (0.08-fold) compared with its control in root. The changes of KoOsmotin expressions were generally consistent with morphological changes. The seedlings treated at cold treatment (5 °C) for 15 d were cultivated under recovery-temperature (25 °C) for 20 d, all these seedlings were still alive. However, at the same recovery condition, the seedlings treated at cold treatment (5 °C) for 20 d were cultivated, all the leaves of these seedlings were withered and fade (data was not shown here). This might indicate that the expression of KoOsmotin had a close relationship with the K.obovata survival and played a key role in protecting K. obovata against cold stress. According to the high consistency between KoOsmotin expression on molecular level and recovery survival on morphological level, it can be deduced that 15–20 days maybe the time-limited range for K. obovata seedlings under cold treatment (5 °C). This will provide reference for north introduction of K. obovata.

Many osmotins had been identified and characterized, and possessed the ability to enhance cold resistance by overexpression in transgenic plants [19, 27, 28]. Overexpressing tobacco osmotin gene in olive plant revealed that the osmotin gene could prevent cold-induced calcium signaling, regulate the dynamics of the cytoskeleton and cold-related programmed cell death [57]. Moreover, the overexpression of the osmotin gene in tobacco could stimulate the expression of downstream genes that were involved in proline biosynthesis under cold conditions [16]. Our study also showed an enhanced cold resistance by overexpressing KoOsmotin gene in transformed E. coli cells. Use prokaryotes to analysis the function of plant genes had been adapted in many studies [46,47,48,49]. Although further investigations are needed, we can infere that KoOsmotin might also possess cold-resistance in transgenic plants. Besides, many scientists have successfully transformed osmotin gene to induce salt, drought and osmotic stress resistance in transgenic plants [16, 19, 26, 55, 57, 58], as well as antifungal activity [40, 59, 60]. These literatures lead us to the conclusion that osmotin is an important PR-protein and is expected to be successfully used in developing plant defense mechanisms in the future. Therefore, it is a great need to further explore the function of this important protein KoOsmotin under biotic and abiotic stress conditions.

Conclusions

This is the first study to explore the osmotin of K. obovata. It also provided valuable clues for further exploring the function of KoOsmotin response to stress. In this study, the KoOsmotin was cloned and characterized from K. obovata. Besides, overexpressing KoOsmotin enhanced cold resistance and increased the growth in E. coli. Further studies, including analyses of its functions using transgenic plants and recombinant proteins, will reveal the exact roles and functions of KoOsmotin involved in biotic and abiotic stress tolerance.

Methods

Plant material and treatments

The hypocotyls of K. obovata were purchased from Guangdong Mangrove Ecological Technology Co. LTD (China). The hypocotyls were germinated in clean sands, and watered with the 1/2 Hoagland solution. At the four-leaf stage, the seedlings were transferred to a growth chamber (25 °C, 75% humidity, 14 h light/10 h dark cycle). The seedlings were cultivated under cold stress (5 °C) for 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 7, 15 and 20 d (day), respectively. All the treatments contained at least three seedlings. The samples (leaves, stems and roots) were washed by ultrapure water and dried by clean paper towels before collected. The samples collected at 0 d were used as the controls. All the harvested samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at − 80 °C before use.

RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis

Total RNA was extracted using Plant Total RNA Extraction Kit (BioTeke Corporation, China), following the manufacturer’s protocol. The RNA pellet was dissolved in RNase free water. RNA was quantified using Nanodrop 1000 spectrophotomete (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA) and checked by agarose gel electrophoresis (1%). Genomic DNA in the total RNA samples was eliminated by RNase-free DNaseI (Promega, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. First strand cDNA was synthesized using SMART™ reverse transcription Kit (Clontech), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The 3′- and 5′-terminal sequences of KoOsmotin were cloned referring to the sequenced region by SMART™ RACE cDNA Amplification Kit (Clontech, USA).

Cloning the full-length cDNA of KoOsmotin gene

The partial nucleotide sequence (GenBank accession no. Ko3113) of the KoOsmotin gene was used as the reference sequence for designing gene primers. The 3′- and 5′-terminal sequences of KoOsmotin were cloned by SMART™ RACE cDNA Amplification Kit (Clontech, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The gene specific primers (GSPs or NGSPs) were synthesised to carry out 3′- and 5′-RACE. GSP1 (5′- TTGTTGCTTCACTGGCAGCTGTGGGCCT-3′) and GSP2 (5′- GAACACAACCGCATAATTAGACCCGGCAG − 3′) were used as primary PCR to obtain 5′ and 3′ end sequences of KoOsmotin gene. NGSP1 (5′-CTGGCAGCTGTGGGCCTACTGTTTACTC-3′) and NGSP2 (5′- AACCGCATAATTAGACCCGGCAGGACAAG-3′) were used to perform nested PCR. The 3′- and 5′- RACE products were purified by agarose gel and transformed with pMD T19 vector (Takara, Japan) into E. coli DH5α competent cells. Positive clones were selected and confirmed by nucleotide sequencing. The obtained 3′- and 5′- nucleotide sequences were assembled with overlap for the full-length of KoOsmotin by the DNAMAN software. The assembled sequence was used to design the primers for cloning the full length of KoOsmotin. The new sequence of KoOsmotin was sent to nucleotide sequencing. Thus, the complete full-length cDNA sequence of KoOsmotin was confirmed and submitted to GenBank under the accession number KP267758.

Bioinformatic analysis

The possible ORF of KoOsmotin was predicted by ORF Finder (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gorf/gorf.html). ExPASy ProtParam tool (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/) was used to predict the molecular weight, theoretical pI and hydrophilia. The trans-membrane domain was predicted by TMpred (http://www.ch.embnet.org/software/TMPRED_form.html). The motif sequences were detected using Motif Scan (http://myhits.isb-sib.ch/cgi-bin/motif_scan). The secondary structure was described by SOPMA tool (https://npsa-prabi.ibcp.fr/cgi-bin/npsa_automat.pl?page=npsa_sopma.html). SignalP-5.0 Server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/) was used to predict potential signal peptide cleavage site. Cell-Ploc 2.0 (http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/Cell-PLoc-2/) and Softberry (http://linux1.softberry.com/) were combined to predict subcellular localization. Sequence comparisons with known sequences were performed by NCBI Databases (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Phylogenetic analysis was conducted by MEGA 5.0 software. Automated 3D structure building was accomplished by SWISS-MODEL tool (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/interactive).

Subcellular localization analysis

To confirm the subcellular localization of KoOsmotin, the entire ORF of KoOsmotin without the stop codon was cloned in the vector pFGC5941-35S-GFP using Hieff Clone® Plus One Step Cloning Kit (Yeasen Biotech, China) following the manufacturer’s instruction. The recombinant plasmid 35S-KoOsmotin-GFP was sequenced and analyzed to confirm successful fusion. The confirmed recombinant plasmid was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 and grown in a Luria-Bertani (LB) medium supplemented with kanamycin (50 μg/mL) overnight at 28 °C. A. tumefaciens suspension harboring 35S-KoOsmotin-GFP plasmid was transiently transformed in Nicotiana benthamiana leaf, with only pFGC5941-35S-GFP vector as the control. The GFP fluorescence signal in the leaf epidermal cells of N. benthamiana was imaged by a Zeiss LSM710 laser scanning confocal microscope. A × 63 oil immersion objective was used for confocal imaging. For excitation of fluorescence proteins, the 488 nm line from the argon ion laser was used to capture fluorescence. Excitation and emission wavelengths were 489 nm and 510 nm for GFP signal detection, respectively.

Expression analysis by RT-qPCR

To investigate transcription levels of KoOsmotin under cold stress, the RT-qPCR method was used to determine the levels in leaves, stems and roots of K.obovata. The RT-qPCR reactions were performed with iCycler iQ5 real time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad, CA, USA) using SYBR Premix Ex TaqTM II reagents (Takara, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The specific primers of KoOsmotin (forward primer, CTGTGGGCCTACTGTTT, reverse primer, TTTGTGGCATCGTCTTT) were designed. The 18S rRNA of K. obovata was used as the internal reference gene. The PCR protocol was as follows: 95 °C for 30 s, 40 cycles at 95 °C for 5 s, 55 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s. Each RT-qPCR reaction was performed with three replicates. The transcript expression of KoOsmotin gene was quantified by the 2-CT method [61, 62]. The data was presented as the mean ± standard deviation (x ± SD). All statistical analyses were performed with student t-test using GraphPad Prism version 5.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California).

Cold tolerance analysis of KoOmotin in E. coli cells

In order to validate the function of KoOsmotin gene in response to cold stress, the ORF region of KoOsmotin without the stop codon was introduced into vector pET28a-T7-His to generate recombinant plasmid KoOsmotin-pET28a. The E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells harbouring KoOsmotin-pET28a were cultured and used for determining the cold tolerance of KoOsmotin. Since the temperature 37 °C is the optimum condition for the growth of E. coli cells, the transformed E. coli cells were cultured in LB medium at 37 °C for 12–16 h. Then re-cultured them at 1% of inoculation volume for 2–3 h until the OD600 was about 0.6. Added IPTG (0.1 mM) and continue to cultivate for 6–8 h until the OD600 was 0.8. Centrifuged and suspended the E. coli cells in 1 mL sterilized 0.9% saline solution. Diluted the solution with sterilized 0.9% saline solution to different concentration gradients, such as 10− 3, 10− 4, 10− 4 × 2− 1, 10− 4 × 2− 2. These different concentration solutions of bacteria were used to analyze the cold tolerance of over-expressing KoOsmotin gene in E. coli cells. For cold tolerance analysis, the transformed E. coli cells were cultured at 5 °C, 15 °C, 25 °C and 37 °C, respectively. E. coli cells containing only empty vector were used as the control.

Availability of data and materials

The KoOsmotin sequence data is available from NCBI database under accession KP267758 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/KP267758.1/). All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article. The data generated or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PR-5:

Pathogenesis-related 5

OLP:

Osmotin-like protien

TLP:

Thaumatin-like proein

ZLP:

Zeamatin-like protein

GFP:

Green fluorescent protein

RT-qPCR:

Real-time quantitative PCR

References

  1. 1.

    Alongi DM. Mangrove forests: resilience, protection from tsunamis, and responses to global climate change. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2008;76:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Mafi-Gholami D, Jaafari A, Zenner EK, Kamari AN, Bui DT. Spatial modeling of exposure of mangrove ecosystems to multiple environmental hazards. Sci Total Environ. 2020;740:140167.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Chen LZ, Wang WQ, Zhang YH, Huang L, Zhao CL, Yang SC, Yang ZW, Chen YC, Xu HL, Zhong CR, Su B, Fang BZ, Chen NM, Zeng CZ, Lin GH. Damage to mangroves from extreme cold in early 2008 in southern China. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica. 2010;34:186–94.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Peng YL, Wang YS, Fei J, Sun CC. Isolation and expression analysis of two novel C-repeat binding factor (CBF) genes involved in plant growth and abiotic stress response in mangrove Kandelia obovata. Ecotoxicology. 2020;29:718–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kumar SA, Kumari PH, Kumar GS, Mohanalatha C, Kishor PBK. Osmotin: a plant sentinel and a possible agonist of mammalian adiponectin. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:163.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Pluskota WE, Pupel P, Glowacka K, Okorska SB, Jerzmanowski A, Nonogaki H, Gorecki RJ. Jasmonic acid and ethylene are involved in the accumulation of osmotin in germinating tomato seeds. J Plant Physiol. 2019;232:74–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Fei J, Wang YS, Jiang ZY, Cheng H, Zhang JD. Identification of cold tolerance genes from leaves of mangrove plant Kandelia obovata by suppression subtractive hybridization. Ecotoxicology. 2015;24:1686–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Hakim UA, Hussain A, Shaban M, Khan AH, Alariqi M, Gul S, Jun Z, Lin S, Li JY, Jin SX, MFH M. Osmotin: a plant defense tool against biotic and abiotic stresses. Plant Physiol Bioch. 2018;123:149–59.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Singh NK, Handa AK, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA. Proteins associated with adaptation of cultured tobacco cells to NaCl. Plant Physiol. 1985;79:126–37.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Singh NK, Nelson DE, Kuhn D, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA. Molecular cloning of osmotin and regulation of its expression by ABA and adaptation to low water potential. Plant Physiol. 1989;90:1096–101.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Noori SAS, Sokhansanj A. Wheat plants containing an osmotin gene show enhanced ability to produce roots at high NaCl concentration. Russ J Plant Physiol. 2008;55:256–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Min K, Ha SC, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA, Yun DJ, Kim KK. Crystal structure of osmotin, a plant antifungal protein. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf. 2004;54:170–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Liu JJ, Zamani A, Ekramoddoullah AK. Expression profiling of a complex thaumatin-like protein family in western white pine. Planta. 2010;231:637–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Abdin MZ, Kiran U, Alam A. Analysis of osmotin, a PR protein as metabolic modulator in plants. Bioinformation. 2011;5:336–40.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Viktorova J, Klcova B, Rehorova K, Vlcko T, Stankova L, Jelenova N, Cejnar P, Kundu JK, Ohnoutkova L, Macek T. Recombinant expression of osmotin in barley improves stress resistance and food safety during adverse growing conditions. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0212718.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Barthakur S, Babu V, Bansal KC. Over-expression of osmotin induces proline accumulation and confers tolerance to osmotic stress in transgenic tobacco. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol. 2001;10:31–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Husaini AM, Abdin MZ. Development of transgenic strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) plants tolerant to salt stress. Plant Sci. 2008;174:446–55.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Yun DJ, Ibeas JI, Lee H, Coca MA, Narasimhan ML, Uesono Y, Hasegawa PM, Pardo JM, Bressan RA. Osmotin, a plant antifungal protein, subverts signal transduction to enhance fungal cell susceptibility. Mol Cell. 1998;1:807–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Le TTT, Williams B, Mundree SG. An osmotin from the resurrection plant Tripogon loliiformis (TlOsm) confers tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses in transgenic rice. Physiol Plantarum. 2018;162:13–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Patade VY, Khatri D, Kumari M, Grover A, Gupta SM, Ahmed Z. Cold tolerance in osmotin transgenic tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is associated with modulation in transcript abundance of stress responsive genes. Springer Plus. 2013;2:117.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Chowdhury S, Basu A, Kundu S. Overexpression of a new osmotin-like protein gene (SindOLP) confers tolerance against biotic and abiotic stresses in sesame. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:410.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kim H, Mun J, Byun BH, Hwang H, Kwon YM, Kim S. Molecular cloning and characterization of the gene encoding osmotin protein in Petunia hybrida. Plant Sci. 2002;162:745–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bashir MA, Silvestri C, Ahmad T, Hafiz IA, Abbasi NA, Manzoor A, Cristofori V, Rugini E. Osmotin: a cationic protein leads to improve biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Plants-Basel. 2020;9:992.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Tong Z, Sun Y, Wang D, Wang L, Li L, Meng X, Feng W, Wurtele ES, Wang X. Identification and functional characterization of HbOsmotin from Hevea brasiliensis. Plant Physiol Bioch. 2016;109:171–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    D’Angeli S, Matteucci M, Fattorini L, Gismondi A, Ludovici M, Canini A, Altamura MM. OeFAD8, OeLIP and OeOSM expression and activity in cold acclimation of Olea europaea, a perennial dicot without winter-dormancy. Planta. 2016;243:1279–96.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kaur A, Reddy MS, Pati PK, Kumar A. Over-expression of osmotin (OsmWS) gene of Withania somnifera in potato cultivar ‘Kufri Chipsona 1’ imparts resistance to Alternaria solani. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2020;142:131–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Patade VY, Meena H, Grover A, Gupta SM, Nasim M. Containment evaluation, cold tolerance and toxicity analysis in osmotin transgenic tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Pusa ruby). 3 Biotech. 2018;8:410.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    D’Angeli S, Altamura M. Osmotin induces cold protection in olive trees by affecting programmed cell death and cytoskeleton organization. Planta. 2007;225:1147–63.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Sripriya R, Parameswari C, Veluthambi K. Enhancement of sheath blight tolerance in transgenic rice by combined expression of tobacco osmotin (ap24) and rice chitinase (chi11) genes. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol—Plant. 2017;53:12–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Narasimhan ML, Coca MA, Jin JB, Yamauchi T, Ito Y, Kadowaki T, Kim KK, Pardo JM, Damsz B, Hasegawa PM, Yun DJ, Bressan RA. Osmotin is a homolog of mammalian adiponectin and controls apoptosis in yeast through a homolog of mammalian adiponectin receptor. Mol Cell. 2005;17:171–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Motamayor JC, Mockaitis K, Schmutz J, Haiminen N, Iii DL, Cornejo O, Findley SD, Zheng P, Utro F, Royaert S, Saski C, Jenkins J, Podicheti R, Zhao M, Scheffler BE, Stack JC, Feltus FA, Mustiga GM, Amores F, Phillips W, Marelli JP, May GD, Shapiro H, Ma J, Bustamante CD, Schnell RJ, Main D, Gilbert D, Parida L, Kuhn DN. The genome sequence of the most widely cultivated cacao type and its use to identify candidate genes regulating pod color. Genome Biol. 2013;14:r53.

  32. 32.

    Castillo Ruiz RA, Herrera C, Ghislain M, Gebhardt C. Organization of phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), acidic PR-5 and osmotin-like (OSM) defence-response gene families in the potato genome. Mol Gen Genomics. 2005;274:168–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Onishi M, Tachi H, Kojima T, Shiraiwa M, Takahara H. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel salt-inducible gene encoding an acidic isoform of PR-5 protein in soybean. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2006;44:574–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Sun S, Zhou Y, Chen J, Shi J, Zhao H, Zhao H, Song W, Zhang M, Cui Y, Dong X, Liu H, Ma X, Jiao Y, Wang B, Wei X, Stein JC, Glaubitz JC, Lu F, Yu G, Liang C, Fengler K, Li B, Rafalski A, Schnable PS, Ware DH, Buckler ES, Lai J. Extensive intraspecific gene order and gene structural variations between Mo17 and other maize genomes. Nat Genet. 2018;50:1289–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Moeller DA, Tiffin P. Genetic diversity and the evolutionary history of plant immunity genes in two species of Zea. Mol Biol Evol. 2005;22:2480–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Du Q, Gong C, Pan W, Zhang D. Development and application of microsatellites in candidate genes related to wood properties in the Chinese white poplar (Populus tomentosa Carr.). DNA Res. 2013;20:31–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Istvanek J, Dluhosova J, Dluhos P, Patkova L, Nedelnik J, Repkova J. Gene classification and mining of molecular markers useful in red clover (Trifolium pratense) breeding. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:367.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Tachi H, Fukuda-Yamada K, Kojima T, Shiraiwa M, Takahara H. Molecular characterization of a novel soybean gene encoding a neutral PR-5 protein induced by high-salt stress. Plant Physiol Bioch. 2009;47:73–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Liu Y, Cui J, Zhou X, Luan Y, Luan F. Genome-wide identification, characterization and expression analysis of the TLP gene family in melon (Cucumis melo L.). Genomics. 2020;112:2499–509.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Viktorova J, Krasny L, Kamlar M, Novakova M, Mackova M, Macek T. Osmotin, a pathogenesis-related protein. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2012;13:672–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Vigers AJ, Roberts WK, Selitrennikoff CP. A new family of plant antifungal proteins. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 1991;4:315–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Schwede T, Kopp J, Guex N, Peitsch MC. SWISS-MODEL: an automated protein homology-modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3381–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Bruno-Moreno F, de Oliveira RSB, Moreira RD, Lobo MDP, de Freitas CDT, Ramos MV, Grangeiro TB, Monteiro-Moreira ACO. Crystallization and X-ray diffraction analysis of an antifungal laticifer protein. Acta Crystallogr F. 2013;69:646–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Dobson CM, Sali A, Karplus M. Protein folding: a perspective from theory and experiment. Angew Chem Int Edit. 1998;37:868–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Liu JJ, Sturrock R, Ekramoddoullah AKM. The superfamily of thaumatin-like proteins: its origin, evolution, and expression towards biological function. Plant Cell Rep. 2010;29:419–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Yamada A, Saitoh T, Mimura T, Ozeki Y. Expression of mangrove allene oxide cyclase enhances salt tolerance in Escherichia coli, yeast, and tobacco cells. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002;43:903–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Liu H, Xing M, Yang W, Mu X, Wang X, Lu F, Wang Y, Zhang L. Genome-wide identification of and functional insights into the late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) gene family in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum). Sci Rep. 2019;9:13375.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Zeng X, Ling H, Yang J, Li Y, Guo S. LEA proteins from Gastrodia elata enhance tolerance to low temperature stress in Escherichia coli. Gene. 2018;646:136–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Zhang N, Zhao H, Shi J, Wu Y, Jiang J. Functional characterization of class I SlHSP17.7 gene responsible for tomato cold-stress tolerance. Plant Sci. 2020;298:110568.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Malehorn D, Borgmeyer JR, Smith CE, Shah DM. Characterization and expression of an antifungal zeamatin-like protein (Zlp) gene from Zea mays. Plant Physiol. 1994;106:1471–81.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Schnable PS, Ware D, Fulton RS, Stein JC, Wei F, Pasternak S, Liang C, Zhang J, Fulton L, Graves TA, Minx P, Reily AD, Courtney L, Kruchowski SS, Tomlinson C, et al. The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science. 2009;326:1112–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Singh NK, Kumar KR, Kumar D, Shukla P, Kirti PB. Characterization of a pathogen induced thaumatin-like protein gene adtlp from Arachis diogoi, a wild peanut. PLoS One. 2013;8:e83963.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Ahmad A, Ali T, Kim MW, Khan A, Jo MH. Rehman S, Khan MS, bin AN, Khan M, UllahR, Jo MG, Kim MO. Adiponectin homolog novel osmotin protects obesity/diabetes-induced NAFLD by upregulating AdipoRs/PPAR alpha signaling in Ob/Ob and db/db transgenic mouse models. Metabolism-Clin Exp. 2019;90:31–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Neale AD, Wahleithner JA, Lund M, Bonnett HT, Kelly A, Meeks-Wagner DR, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES. Chitinase, beta- 1,3-glucanase, osmotin, and extensin are expressed in tobacco explants during flower formation. Plant Cell. 1990;2:673–84.

  55. 55.

    Silvestri C, Celletti S, Cristofori V, Astolfi S, Ruggiero B, Rugini E. Olive (Olea europaea L.) plants transgenic for tobacco osmotin gene are less sensitive to in vitro-induced drought stress. Acta Physiol Plant. 2017;39:229.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Jia K, Zhang Q, Xing Y, Yan J, Liu L, Nie K. A development-associated decrease in osmotic potential contributes to fruit ripening initiation in strawberry (Fragaria ananassa). Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:1035.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Parkhi V, Kumar V, Sunilkumar G, Campbell LM, Singh NK, Rathore KS. Expression of apoplastically secreted tobacco osmotin in cotton confers drought tolerance. Mol Breed. 2009;23:625–39.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Weber RLM, Wiebke-Strohm B, Bredemeier C, Margis-Pinheiro M, de Brito GG, Rechenmacher C, Bertagnolli PF, de Sa MEL, Campos MDA, de RMS A, Beneventi MA, Margis R, Grossi-de-Sa MF. Bodanese-Zanettini M. Expression of an osmotin-like protein from Solanum nigrum confers drought tolerance in transgenic soybean. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14:343.

  59. 59.

    Silvaa RJS, Alves RM, Gramacho KP, Marcellino LH, Micheli F. Involvement of structurally distinct cupuassu chitinases and osmotin in plant resistance to the fungus Moniliophthora perniciosa. Plant Physiol Bioch. 2020;148:142–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Zhao Q, Qiu B, Li S, Zhang Y, Cui X, Liu D. Osmotin-like protein gene from panax notoginseng is regulated by jasmonic acid and involved in defense responses to Fusarium solani. Phytopathology. 2020;110:1419–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, Mueller R, Nolan T, Pfaffl MW, Shipley GL, Vandesompele J, Wittwer CT. The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem. 2009;55:611–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(T)(-Delta Delta C) method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We greatly thank all of our colleagues in our laboratory for providing useful technical assistance.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41706118, No. 41676086, No. U1901211, No.41430966 and No.41876126), International Partnership Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No.133244KYSB20180012), the National Key Research and Development Plan (No.2017FY100700) and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No.XDA23050200, No.XDA13010500 and No. XDA13020503). Key Special Project for Introduced Talents Team of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou) (GML2019ZD0305). The funding body was not involved in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JF conceived, designed and undertook the experiments and wrote the manuscript. YSW designed, conceptualized and supervised the manuscript. HC conceived and supervised the research, revised and developed this manuscript. YBS participated in experiments of gene expression analysis and function analysis, as well as revised the manuscript. YJZ conducted experiment of subcellular localization and contributed to improve this manuscript. LZ participated the preparation and analysis of subcellular localization. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to You-shao Wang or Hao Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fei, J., Wang, Ys., Cheng, H. et al. Cloning and characterization of KoOsmotin from mangrove plant Kandelia obovata under cold stress. BMC Plant Biol 21, 10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02746-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Osmotin
  • Mangrove plant
  • Kandelia obovata
  • 3D model
  • Gene expression
  • Cold-resistance