Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Demographic history and genetic differentiation of an endemic and endangered Ulmus lamellosa (Ulmus)

BMC Plant Biology volume 20, Article number: 526 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Ulmus lamellosa (one of the ancient species of Ulmus) is an endemic and endangered plant that has undergone climatic oscillations and geographical changes. The elucidation of its demographic history and genetic differentiation is critical for understanding the evolutionary process and ecological adaption to forests in Northern China.

Results

Polymorphic haplotypes were detected in most populations of U. lamellosa via DNA sequencing. All haplotypes were divided into three phylogeographic clades fundamentally corresponding to their geographical distribution, namely THM (Taihang Mountains), YM (Yinshan Mountains), and YSM (Yanshan Mountains) groups. The YSM group, which is regarded as ancestral, possessed higher genetic diversity and significant genetic variability in contrast to the YSM and YM groups. Meanwhile, the divergence time of intraspecies haplotypes occurred during the Miocene-Pliocene, which was associated with major Tertiary geological and/or climatic events. Different degrees of gene exchanges were identified between the three groups. During glaciation, the YSM and THM regions might have served as refugia for U. lamellosa. Based on ITS data, range expansion was not expected through evolutionary processes, except for the THM group. A series of mountain uplifts (e.g., Yanshan Mountains and Taihang Mountains) following the Miocene-Pliocene, and subsequently quaternary climatic oscillations in Northern China, further promoted divergence between U. lamellosa populations.

Conclusions

Geographical topology and climate change in Northern China played a critical role in establishing the current phylogeographic structural patterns of U. lamellosa. These results provide important data and clues that facilitate the demographic study of tree species in Northern China.

Background

Examining how historical and contemporary ecological factors contribute to the demographic history and genetic differentiation of plants is a central question in ecology and evolution. Climatic oscillations have dramatically influenced the demographic history and patterns of genetic diversification in many plant species, particularly during the Pleistocene periods with more frequent glacial–interglacial cycles [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. In Asia, at least four major glaciations are thought to have occurred, which likely affected its flora and fauna, although the glacial advances were not as extensive as that of Europe and North America. Northern China, in particular, experienced severe climatic oscillations throughout the Quaternary, but was never covered by massive ice-sheets [9,10,11]. The climatic oscillations caused by repeated glaciations shifted species ranges and isolated populations, which could generate distinct population structures, namely, “southern richness” and “northern purity” [12,13,14].

Meanwhile, the potential role of geology in facilitating the population divergence and species diversification of plants has been revealed [9, 11, 15, 16]. In China, the geographical and physiognomy complexity caused by the uplift of mountains [17, 18] often provided dispersal corridors for the connection, gene flow, and range expansions/contractions of fragmented populations [19, 20]. Mountainous areas might serve as shelters for the range shifts of plants in response to climatic oscillations [21,22,23,24,25,26]. Some mountains, such as the Taihang, Yanshan, Yinshan, and Qinling Mountains of Northern China, are an important component of the South-North vegetation transect, and crucial biodiversity areas covered with diverse plant biomes, ranging from tropical to cold forests and taiga [27, 28]. These mountains form diverse topographies and wide spectrum environmental conditions, which provided refugia for species during the global scale climatic changes of the Quaternary [29, 30].

Previous researches have revealed different refugia patterns for forest trees in China, such as single refugium, multiple refugia, microrefugia, and cryptic refugia [31,32,33]. Nevertheless, most studies have focused on the populations or species in the Southern, Southwestern, and Northwestern regions of China [3, 24, 34], with little research being done on the Northern areas. The potential roles of ecological factors (e.g., geologic and climatic oscillations) in promoting the divergence of plant populations in Northern China remain unclear.

Ulmus lamellosa (Ulmus) is primarily distributed across and endemic in Northern China, which is an important tree in many communities and terrestrial ecosystems. The abundance of decylic acid in the seeds of this species makes it a critical medicinal and light industrial resource [35], and further, the tree trunks have rich ornamental characteristics [36].

Unfortunately, U. lamellosa populations are constantly decreasing due to environmental degradation and anthropogenic destruction. Thus, it has been classified as a Class II State-Protected Endangered Plant Species in China [37, 38]. As an ancient and long-lived tree species, U. lamellosa might have existed prior to the uplift of Taihang, Yinshan, and Yanshan Mountains, and experienced the climatic oscillations of the Quaternary and even the Tertiary [39]. Consequently, this species was considered to be an ideal species for investigating the influences of geographical topology and climatic dynamics on species divergence in Northern China.

Using chloroplast derived DNA sequences, Liu et al. (2017) preliminarily investigated the molecular phylogeographical structures and biogeographic history of U. lamellosa. A significant phylogeographic pattern was found for this tree species, where the intraspecific divergence of all cpDNA haplotypes began to occur in the late Miocene. Most studied U. lamellosa populations have not experienced recent expansions. Across the distribution ranges of this species, multiple refuge areas were identified in Northern China [40]. These results provided insights into the phylogeography and demographical history of U. lamellosa. However, chloroplast genes have a relatively slower evolutionary ratio than do nuclear genes, are generally of maternal inheritance, and cannot reflect pollen flow in angiosperms [41,42,43]. Furthermore, the results based on chloroplast genes provide only limited information on the phylogeographic structures and evolutionary history of plants, particularly intra-specifically [25, 44].

For this study, we proposed the hypothesis that U. lamellosa had multiple refuges in Northern China, where geological changes and climatic oscillations played important roles in the demographic history of this species. Thus, our main goals were to comparatively investigate the demographic history and genetic differentiation of U. lamellosa, analyze the phylogeographic patterns of this boreal tree, identify the refugia patterns during glacial periods, and estimate intraspecies haplotype divergence times during the evolutionary process of this species. These results would shed light not only on the effect mechanisms of climatic oscillations and orogeny of mountains (Taihang, Yanshan and Yinshan Mountains) on the genetic differentiation and distribution patterns of populations, but also offer a theoretical foundation for the investigation of other forest trees across Northern China.

Methods

Plant materials

Our field work had been approved by the Chinese government and implemented in compliance with the laws of the People’s Republic of China. Each sampling participant had a permission letter from School of Life Sciences of Shanxi Normal University. By referencing to the phenotypic characteristics of the collected samples, the professor (Su Junxia, Shanxi Normal University) of systematic botany assisted in the classification and identification. Voucher specimens were kept at the Herbarium of School of Life Sciences, Shanxi Normal University (No: 20180703422–20,180,703,436).

A total of 232 individuals across fourteen natural populations of U. lamellosa were collected from its distribution range in Northern China. According to the filed sampled sites, three main geographical groups were assigned based on mountain boundaries, which were marked as THM (Taihang Mountains), YSM (Yanshan Mountains), and YM (Yinshan Mountains), respectively. Details on the geographical locations of the populations and the number of sampled individuals are presented in Additional file 1: Table S1 and Fig. 1. Individuals within each population need to be kept at least 30 m away from each other to prevent the occurrence of sampling clones. The fresh leaves of each individual were stored in silica gel at room temperature for DNA extraction.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Geographical distribution and the median-joining network of haplotypes. a Geographical distribution of 18 ITS haplotypes; b The median-joining network of 18 ITS haplotypes; c Geographical distribution of 23 Aat haplotypes; d The median-joining network of 23 Aat haplotypes

Full size image

DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing

Through Cetyl Trimethylammonium Bromide (CTAB) methods, the total genomic DNA was extracted from fresh leaves [45, 46] followed by the determination of its quality and concentration with the spectrophotometer and agarose gel electrophoresis (0.8%), respectively. The universal primer ITS4 and ITS5 used to amplify of the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer regions (nrITS: ITS1, 5.8SrDNA and ITS2), and the single-copy gene (Aat) [47, 48], were selected for this study due to the high sequence variation within and among U. lamellosa populations [40].

The total volume of Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) system was 25 μL, mainly consisting of 2 × MasterMix (12.5 μL, containing 0.2 mM dNTPs, 3 mM MgCl2, 1 × PCR buffer and 0.1 U Taq DNA polymerase), ddH2O (7.5 μL), template DNA (30 ng/μL, 4 μL), and forward and reverse primer (0.5 μL, 0.5 μL). The PCR conditions was performed by using the PTC-200 Peltier Thermal Cycler (MJ Research) as follows: 94 °C predenaturation for 3 min, 34 cycles of denaturation for 30 s, 55 °C annealing for 1 min (for ITS and Aat),72 °C elongation for 2 min and a final step at 72C elongation for 10 min.

The PCR products were purified by a Wizard PCR Preps DNA purification system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and then sequenced with an ABI Prism 310 DNA sequencer (Applied Bio systems Inc., Foster City, CA, USA) of Shanghai Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd.

The DNA sequences obtained from nrITS and Aat were aligned using CLUSTAL X software [49] and then adjusted manually. All indels were encoded into the data matrix according to the simple indel coding method [50], as implemented in INDELCODER [51].

Data analysis

Genetic diversity and differentiation

For each population, DNASP software [52,53,54,55] was employed to calculate the nucleotide diversity (π), the number of haplotypes, and the haplotype diversity (Hd). The presence of phylogeographic structure was tested by using PERMUT [56,57,58] software (10,000 permutations) based on the parameter NST (a distance matrix based on the number of mutational steps between haplotypes) significantly higher than GST (haplotype frequencies). NETWORK software [59] was utilized to infer the relationship between the differentiation and evolution of haplotypes with the maximum parsimony median-joining model.

STRUCTURE software can detect the potential population structure more accurately duo to eliminating the interference of population locations [60,61,62]. With the associated gene frequency admixture model, for each K (K = 1–10), ten independent runs were conducted with an initial burn-in of 100,000 iterations and 1000,000 subsequent Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) steps. The log probability of data (LnP(D)) and the second rate of change in the likelihood distribution (ΔK) were applied to evaluate the potential clusters (K) [63]. The Q matrix was obtained by integrating the membership coefficient matrix of repeated operation from the results of STRUCTURE analysis by using CLUMPP software. And it was finally visualized as a diagram by using DISTRUCT software [60,61,62,63].

To quantify and assess the proportion of explainable genetic variance between groups and among populations within groups, an hierarchical analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) [64] was conducted by ARLEQUIN software [54, 65], and then tested the significance with 1000 permutations.

Population demographic history

Mismatch distribution and neutrality tests

To infer whether there existed significant historic demographic expansion events in each geographical group, the mismatch distribution analysis was performed by ARLEQUIN software with 1000 parametric bootstraps [65, 66]. The parametric SSD (the sum of squared deviations) and HRag (Harpending’s raggedness index) were applied to appraise the goodness-of-fit under a sudden expansion model [67]. Meanwhile, the Tajima’s D (Tajima, 1989) [68] and Fu’s FS (Fu, 1997) neutrality tests [69], as two alternate method, were used to infer potential expansions events.

The time of occurrence of expansion events was calculated by the following formula [66, 70]: T = τ/2 u, where τ was the parameter value for the mode of the mismatch distribution and u was the result of the formula u = μkg. The value μ, k and g represent the number of substitutions per site per year (s/s/y), the average sequence length under study, and the generation time in years, respectively [71, 72]. The parameter value α (maturity age of species, about 30 years) and [S/1 − S] (about 100; S, annual survival rate of adult individuals) was utilized to estimate the expansions time by using g = a + [S/(1 − S)] [73, 74].

Divergence time

To relate the historic events and differentiation among U. lamellosa haplotypes, the divergence time was calculated using BEAST software with a calibrated molecular clock [44, 75,76,77,78,79]. The HKY, as the optimal model, was employed in BEAST analysis according to the Akaike information criterion (AIC) using jMODELTEST software [80, 81], and coalescence with a constant size was set as the prior tree. Due to the absence of records of ITS mutation rates in U. lamellosa or other Ulmaceae family members, the minimum and maximum values of all average ITS mutation rates of angiosperms [3.2 × 10− 10 and 9.0 × 10− 9 substitutions per site per year (s/s/y)] was selected to date the demographic events in this study [82].

The fossil records for Ulmus (15.97–13.82 Ma, https://www.paleobiodb.org/classic) were to be calibrated. The analysis was implemented for 50 million generations, with sampling frequency of once per 1000 generations. The log files were run in TRACER [83] and the 1000,000 generations were discarded as burn-in to ensure that the overall ESS value met the requirements (> 200). The TREEANNOTATOR software was applied to calculated an maximum clade credibility (MCC) tree with posterior probability (PP) limit > 0.5 using after removing the first 20% of trees as burn-in. And then the FIGTREE was used to visualize the final file [79, 84].

Approximate Bayesian computation

ABC analysis (Approximate Bayesian Computation) [76, 85,86,87] was performed in DIY-ABC software to model the potential demographic history and to evaluate the plausible evolutionary scenario of U. lamellose [88]. To simplify the number of model settings and operation time, we pooled all U. lamellosa populations into three geographical groups (THM, YSM, and YM). First, seven population divergence scenarios were tested with 7,000,000 coalescent simulations: scenario 1 (Simple split model), scenarios 2–4 (Hierarchical split model), and scenarios 5–7 (Isolation with admixture model). For the common parameters between models, the range was the same and the prior distribution was uniform. Based on the observation data closest to 1% of the simulated data, the posterior probability of each evolutionary event was predicted and the confidence interval up to 95% could be obtained by logistic regression. The optimal evolution scenario was filtered by using the highest a posteriori probability (PP) as the selection criterion.

In order to verify a goodness fit scenario, the “model checking” function in DIYABC software, namely principal component analysis (PCA), was used to analyze the simulated datasets (100,000) in the summary statistics. Based on the pseudo-observed datasets (PODs, 1000), type I and type II error rates was evaluated using the “evaluate confidence in scenario choice” functional option of DIYABC. According the above indices, the ancestral group of the optimal scenarios was further finally inferred.

Historical and contemporary gene flow

The coalescent method, implemented in MIGRATE-N software, was employed to investigate the historical gene flow pattern between the three geographical U. lamellosa groups [89,90,91,92]. The Bayesian method was used to estimate historical migration rates (M = m/μ, where m = migration rate) among groups and the effective population size (θ = 4Neμ, where μ = mutation rate) of different groups [89, 93]. The eq. 4Nm = θ ∗ M was employed to compute the number of migration per generation (Nm) of each population of U. lamellosa [89, 93, 94].

Furthermore, the gene flow analysis was performed under the HKY mutation model. It was run for five replications with constant mutation rates and starting parameters based on FST calculations. Each replicate was analyzed with 3 long chains and 10 short chains. The static heating treatment scheme corresponded to four temperature levels (1, 1.2, 1.5, and 3) and 1000,000 trees was discarded as burn-in. Then, the average of the results of five independent operations, namely the historical gene flow, would be obtained with a confidence interval of 95%.

BAYESASS software was used to calculate the contemporary gene flow [90, 92] between the three geographical U. lamellosa groups. This analysis was ran for 10,000,000 iterations with a sampling frequency of 1000 following a burn-in of 1000,000. The delta values for a (allele frequencies), m (migration), and f (inbreeding) was adjusted to 0.5 for guaranteeing the fixed numbers of changes were limited within the range from 20 to 60% of the total number of iterations. The data with the lowest deviance in 20 runs were selected in the further analysis. And the 95% confidence interval was calculated by mc ±1.96 × SD [74].

Isolation by distance and environment

To assess the influences of geographic isolation (IBD) and / or environmental conditions (IBE) on the observed genetic differentiation of U. lamellosa [54, 95, 96], the Mantel test of correlations was performed between genetic, geographic, and environmental distances, respectively.

Pairwise FST estimated from the ITS / Aat sequences was used as the genetic distances matrix. And the geographic distances between populations was calculated by using the GENALEX software [97]. While the matrix of the environmental distances was computed using PASSAGE software [98].

In addition, a multiple matrix regression with randomization (MMRR) was also performed to test whether the genetic distance responded to variations in the geographic and/or environmental distances via using the R package ‘PopGenReport’ [99, 100]. Correlation coefficients of the Mantel test (r) and regression coefficient of the MMRR (r2) and their significance were determined based on 9999 random permutations.

Results

Phylogeographical structures and genetic differentiation

The alignment of ITS and Aat sequences from 232 U. lamellosa individuals produced a consensus sequence of 652 and 392 base pairs, respectively. For the ITS sequences, eighteen haplotypes were defined with 27 polymorphic sites, including 17 parsimonious informative sites (Table 1). Between the 18 haplotypes, the most common was H1 (in 13 of 14 populations), followed by H2 (in 3 of 14 populations). Thirteen of the 14 populations were polymorphic, whereas only one population exhibited one haplotype (MS population, Table 1 and Fig. 1a). All haplotypes presented a ‘star-like’ network, where the common haplotype (H1) was in the central position and regarded as the most widespread one that connected other subordinate haplotypes (Fig. 1b).

Table 1 The estimated diversity indexes of Ulmus lamellosa populations
Full size table

For the Aat data, twenty-three haplotypes (H1-H23) were defined, which contained 33 polymorphic sites, 26 of which were parsimonious informative sites (Table 1 and Fig. 1c). Among all of the haplotypes, the most common was H4 (in 5 of 14 populations). Eleven of the 14 populations possessed high haplotype diversity, and only one haplotype was found in the MS, LS, and WLS populations. As the most common and widespread haplotype, compared with the others s, H4 had more connections, was relatively situated in the middle of the network (Fig. 1d).

A high genetic diversity was detected for U. lamellosa. At the species level, the estimated haplotype diversity (Hd ITS, Hd Aat) was 0.424 and 0.941, whereas the nucleotide diversity (π ITS, π Aat) was 0.00212 and 0.01601, respectively. For the group level based on ITS data, the highest values of Hd ITS (0.909) and π ITS (0.00939) existed in the YSM group, followed by the THM and YM groups. On the contrary, the Hd Aat and π Aat values of the YSM group were slightly lower than that of the THM and YM groups via Aat data.

Between populations, the highest Hd value was detected in the different populations for different data (Hd ITS = 0.798 for the SFS population; Hd Aat = 1.000 for the SGS, HHG, SFS, and MLG populations). The highest π ITS value also existed in the SFS population (0.00583), and the highest πAat value was found in the SGS and HHG populations (Table 1).

The phylogenetic relationships of the ITS haplotypes (H1–H18) constructed using the Bayesian approach, revealed that all haplotypes were clustered into three major clades I-III (Fig. 2), which was essentially consistent with the geographical population distribution (namely YSM, THM, and YM groups). Clade I contained H9-H12, which were found in the YSM group. Clade II contained H8 and H16, which were found in THM and YSM groups. Clade III consisted of twelve haplotypes (H1–7, H13–15, H17, and H18) found in the THM and YM groups. For Aat data, 23 haplotypes were also clustered into three major clades (Additional file 2: Fig. S1), which was basically consistent with that of the haplotype network. Clade I and II contained most of the haplotypes, which were found in the THM and YSM groups. Clade III contained H5-H7, H15-H17, and H23, which were found in the THM and YM groups.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The chronogram for Ulmus lamellosa based on BEAST analysis of ITS sequences. Positions of the fossil calibrations were indicated by a five-pointed star. Divergence times were labeled on each node. Blue bars at nodes represented the 95% highest probability density (HPD) for the age of that node

Full size image

No matter the ITS or Aat data, the genetic differentiation between populations was significantly higher when computed using a distance matrix (NST ITS = 0.435; NST Aat = 0.738) than when using haplotype frequencies (GST ITS = 0.117; GST Aat = 0.192; P < 0.05), which indicated a significant phylogeographic structure within U. lamellosa.

For ITS, the STRUCTURE output showed that ΔK supported the existence of three clusters (Additional file 3: Fig. S2), which corresponded roughly with our geographic assignment to U. lamellosa (Table 1 and Fig. 1). Nevertheless, the STRUCTURE output for Aat data indicated that ΔK supported the existence of four clusters (Additional file 3: Fig. S2). However, when K = 4, the THM group was further subdivided into two clusters. Therefore, we preferred to divide the U. lamellosa into three clusters. Additionally, a higher inter-group differentiation of this species was confirmed by AMOVA analysis (ΦST ITS = 0.550, ΦST Aat = 0.674, P < 0.01, Table 2). Significant variation (ITS: 40.60%, Aat: 41.96%) occurred between the three groups (Table 2).

Table 2 Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) based on ITS and Aat sequences for Ulmus lamellosa
Full size table

Inference of demographic history

Expansion events and divergence time

The SSD and HRag values were non-significant (P > 0.05) for all groups based on the ITS sequences. Nevertheless, the unimodal mismatch distribution for the THM group was a perfect fit to the expected expansion distribution (Table 3), as supported by a significant Tajima’s D statistic value. Thus, only the THM group of U. lamellosa experienced a recent demographic expansion, which occurred approximately 0.0038 Ma. For the Aat sequences, mismatch distributions were multimodal, and differed strongly from the predictions under a sudden population expansion model, which was evidenced by non-significant values (P > 0.01) of Tajima’s D statistics for the three groups (Table 3).

Table 3 Neutrality tests (Tajima’s D and Fu’s FS tests) and mismatch distribution analyses
Full size table

When Ulmus pumila and Ulmus rubra were used as outgroups, the phylogenetic tree based on ITS data revealed that all of the haplotypes from U. pumila and U. rubra formed a monophyletic group, whereas the haplotypes of U. lamellosa formed another monophyletic group (Fig. 2). The haplotypes identified in the outgroups were divergent from all of the other haplotypes at ~ 14.89 Ma (95% HPD: 8.67–17.22 Ma). The eighteen haplotypes of U. lamellosa formed a lineage that was divergent at ~ 13.35 Ma (95% HPD: 9.38–14.89 Ma).

This suggested that the intraspecific divergence of all haplotypes most likely proceeded during the period between the Middle-Miocene to the early stage of the Late Miocene. Within U. lamellosa, all haplotypes could be roughly classified into three lineages, and the divergence times from clade I to clade III were 4.56 Ma (95% HPD: 1.62–8.34 Ma), 2.89 Ma (95% HPD: 1.24–8.68 Ma), and 9.64 Ma (95% HPD: 5.53–13.78 Ma), respectively.

ABC scenarios

An ABC framework permitted an evaluation for population divergence scenarios of U. lamellosa. Scenario 2 (Fig. 3a, b) had the highest posterior probability (ITS: Direct estimate: 0.4540, 95% CI: 0.0176–0.8904; Logistic regression: 0.5913, 95% CI: 0.5694–0.6132; Aat: Direct estimate: 0.2360, 95% CI: 0–0.6082; Logistic regression: 0.4695, 95% CI: 0.4584–0.4807) and did not overlap with other scenarios (Fig. 3c-f). This scenario was fitted to the observed data confirmed by PCA results. According to the model checking, the error for Scenario 2 was low (ITS: Direct approach: 0.061, Logistic approach: 0.075; Aat: Direct approach: 0.071, Logistic approach: 0.077). Consequently, Scenario 2, namely the YSM group, might be a common ancestor of the THM and YM groups, which diverged at time t2. Subsequently, the YM group diverged from the THM group at time t1 (Fig. 3a, b). Under Scenario 2, posterior media parameter estimates indicated that the first divergence occurred in 10.36 × 106 (ITS: 95% CI: 4.23 × 106 _ 12.88 × 106), and 8.25 × 106 (Aat: 95% CI: 2.56 × 106 _ 12.73 × 106) years with a generation time of 130 years.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The Approximate Bayesian Computation analysis of Ulmus lamellosa assessed using DIYABC software. Time in generations was t (t2 ≥ t1). a optimal model (ITS), c, e posterior probabilities (ITS), b optimal model (Aat), d, f posterior probabilities (Aat)

Full size image

The effective population size was estimated based on the sequencing data. For the ITS data, the THM group has the largest effective population size (5.92 × 105, 95% CI: 1.88 × 105_ 9.52× 105), followed by the YSM group (4.56 × 105, 95% CI: 1.06 × 105_ 9.49 × 105) and YM group (1.74 × 105, 95%CI: 1.96 × 104_ 8.59× 105). For Aat, the median values of the effective population size were 2.35 × 105 (95% CI: 4.65 × 104_ 8.70× 105) for the THM group, 2.79 × 105 (95% CI: 4.50 × 104_ 9.21 × 105) for the YSM (the ancestral group), and 2.17 × 105 (95% CI: 1.56 × 104_ 9.27 × 105) for the YM group. There was no significant difference in the effective population size between all groups based on Aat data.

Historical and contemporary gene flow

The historical gene flow was asymmetric and higher than the modern gene flow (Fig. 4). For ITS sequences, the highest level of migration occurred from YSM to THM (1.696, 95% CI: 0.431–3.528), and the lowest level of gene flow occurred in the opposite direction (THM to YSM: 0.200, 95% CI: 0–0.293) (Fig. 4a). A higher level of migration occurred between THM and YM (YM to THM: 0.848, 95% CI: 0–2.732; THM to YM: 0.752, 95% CI: 0.104–1.799) (Fig. 4a) and the lower level occurred from YSM to YM (0.735, 95% CI: 0.100–1.799). According to the Aat sequences, the historical gene flow was generally high. A higher level of migration also occurred from THM to YM (8.699, 95% CI: 0–44.699) (Fig. 4c) than in the opposite direction. Nevertheless, a relatively high level of migration occurred from YSM to YM (4.977, 95% CI: 0–13.119).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Estimates of historical gene flow using MIGRATE, contemporary gene flow using BEYASASS and 95% confidence intervals (CI) (in parentheses) within (a) historical gene flow based on ITS, (b) contemporary gene flow based on ITS, (c) historical gene flow based on Aat, and (d) contemporary gene flow based on Aat

Full size image

The modern gene flow was low and asymmetrical, and BAYESASS analysis showed that the mean contemporary gene flow (m) based on ITS data between the three groups ranged from 0.008 to 0.279 (Fig. 4b). Similarly, a higher level of migration occurred from YSM-THM-YM (YSM-THM: 0.058, 95% CI: 0–0.138, THM-YM: 0.264, 95% CI: 0.104–0.423). However, a strong migration occurred from YM to THM (0.279, 95% CI: 0.208–0.349). For Aat sequences, the mean contemporary gene flow (m) between the three groups ranged from 0.008 to 0.260 (Fig. 4d). The highest level of migration occurred from YM to THM (0.260, 95% CI: 0.175–0.345). Further, a higher level of migration occurred from YSM-THM-YM (YSM-THM: 0.030, 95% CI: 0–0.084, THM-YM: 0.036, 95% CI: 0.006–0.065).

IBD and IBE

Pairwise FST values between populations (used as genetic distance) were correlated against the respective pairwise geographic and environmental distances (Additional file 4: Fig. S3). The positive correlation between the matrix of genetic distances and geographical distances was significant (ITS: r = 0.594, P < 0.05; Aat: r = 0.391, P < 0.05). However, the correlations between genetic distances estimated from the ITS /Aat and environmental distance were non-significant (P > 0.05).

Multiple matrix regression with randomization (MMRR) analyses also revealed a significant effect of geographical distance on the divergence of this species. Furthermore, IBD explained more genetic variation than IBE (ITS: MMRR ≈ 12.4 times as much; Aat: MMRR ≈ 3.7 times as much).

Discussion

Phylogeographic structures and genetic differentiation of U. lamellosa

A high level of genetic diversity was observed for U. lamellosa (Hd ITS = 0.424, πITS = 0.00212; Hd Aat = 0.941, πAat = 0.01601), which was similar with other plants, such as Gentiana lawrencei var. farreri (Hd = 0.414, π = 0.0026), and was consistent with the results of Liu et al. [40]. Compared with cpDNA data (Hd = 0.783, π = 0.00891) [40], the genetic diversity index of U. lamellosa was higher than that of ITS sequences and lower than that of Aat sequences (Table 1).

The different evolutionary trajectories and rates of nuclear and plastid markers might have been the cause of different degrees of variation, and reflected different biogeographic events such as pollen flow and seed dispersal [7, 16, 18, 44, 57, 101, 102]. High genetic diversity might reflect the accumulation of nucleotide mutations over long evolutionary U. lamellosa time-scales [103, 104]. In addition, U. lamellosa was widely distributed in Northern China (Additional file 1: Table S1 and Fig. 1). The geographic distribution of this species might also be one of the factors that determined high genetic diversity [105].

Being an ancestor of the other two groups (Fig. 3), the YSM group had a higher diversity and variation (Table 1), which suggested a smaller influence of historical climatic oscillations on this group. The Yanshan Mountains, which run roughly East-West, is an important mountain range in Northern China [106]. The heterogeneous geology of this mountain might have facilitated the existence of multiple glacial refugia for the plants [28, 107]. In our study, higher haplotype diversity was detected in the YSM group with five unique haplotypes (H8-H12, H16). Thus, the YSM group could be regarded as a refugia for U. lamellosa during the glacial period.

Meanwhile, QLY, SGS, JM, and HLS populations in the THM group (Table 1) exhibited the highest genetic diversity, although this group’s total genetic diversity was lower. It is possible that THM was another refugia for U. lamellosa. However, the YM group, having not only the lowest genetic diversity, but also being a descendent of THM and YSM (Fig. 3), was not regarded as a refugia in this study, which was inconsistent with Liu et al. [40].

A significant genetic differentiation between groups (Table 2, Fig. 1b, d, Additional file 2: Fig. S1) was revealed in the studied species, which suggested a long period of isolation during the distribution of U. lamellosa. Our results also found asymmetrical and lower contemporary gene flow (ITS: 0.0058–0.0690, Aat: 0.0083–0.1636, Fig. 4) among the three groups. Meanwhile, significant isolation by distance (r ITS = 0.594, r Aat = 0.39, P < 0.05; Additional file 4: Fig. S3) was presented in populations of this species. Such findings pinpointed that, as barriers, mountains might have driven population differentiation through long-term geographic isolation. More strikingly, most haplotypes were private as single groups. This pattern more likely resulted from long-term in situ diversification between isolated montane habitats.

Moreover, a strong phylogeographic structure was found, which was consistent with Liu et al. [40]. Theoretically, phylogeographic structures often arise as a consequence of restricted gene flow between populations and genetic drift within populations over relatively long timelines [56, 108, 109]. With the uplift of mountains in Northern China, the U. lamellosa habitats were naturally fragmented [38]. Climatic fluctuations that occurred during inter−/postglacial would further accelerate the habitat fragmentation of this species.

Such isolation made it difficult for pollinators to locate or access flowers and thus formed potential barriers to gene flow. Further, due to natural decomposition and animal consumption, the dispersal of U. lamellosa seeds was also restricted [36, 57]. The historical and modern restricted gene flow (Fig. 4) between groups supported this view. In addition, fragmentation is a consequence of isolation that can arise either from geographic or environmental factors [40]. The fragmented habitats of U. lamellosa could not counteract the effects of genetic drift. Therefore, limited gene flow and genetic drift were the primary causes of the phylogeographical structure for U. lamellosa.

Demographic population history of U. lamellosa

Neither ITS nor Aat sequences indicated that most of the U. lamellosa populations did not experience expansion, which was supported by the mismatched distribution (Table 3), as well as non-significance Tajima’s D and Fu’s FS values, and consistent with Liu et al. [40]. Interestingly, only the THM group (ITS data showed) of U. lamellosa experienced a recent demographic expansion that occurred ~ 3800 years ago. This was strongly supported by ABC analyses, which revealed that the THM group had the larger effective population size (5.92 × 105, 95% CI: 1.88 × 105_ 9.52× 105) over ancestral populations (YSM group). Furthermore, a higher gene flow occurred from THM to YM (Fig. 4).

Despite the absence of major Quaternary glaciations, significant climatic oscillations still occurred in Northern China [110,111,112]. During this period, plant communities might have experienced the upward and downward migration along the local altitude, rather than southward retreat or northward advance in latitude [113]. Therefore, U. lamellosa might have taken refuge in situ and experienced only limited expansion during the interglacial period. The geographical distribution of haplotypes also supported this expansion pattern in the historical demography of U. lamellosa, namely the occurrence of common haplotypes H1 (ITS data) and H4 (Aat data) in the populations (Fig. 1a, c).

The intraspecific divergence of all U. lamellosa ITS haplotypes (13.35 Ma, 95% HPD: 9.38–14.89 Ma) likely began during the period between Middle-Miocene and the early stage of the Late Miocene (Fig. 2). This estimated divergence time was earlier than the Late Miocene based on cpDNA data (9.27 Ma, 95% HPD: 5.17–13.33 Ma) [40]. The Miocene to Pliocene period is an important differentiation epoch for this tree species in China. The Miocene was a period of climatic instability and abrupt environmental change. A global cooling event reoccurred in the Miocene (14 Ma) [11, 14, 114]. Prior to and following 16 ~ 12 Ma, the monsoon circulation was significantly enhanced in Asia [14, 115,116,117]. Most areas of Northern China were gradually altered from the arid climate, which was controlled by the original planetary climate, to the present warm temperate monsoon climate system [118, 119]. Thus, Northern China was not only under the control of global climate change, but also affected by the expansion of an arid climate from the West to East [120]. Paleoclimate oscillation caused by corresponding events prompted the U. lamellosa populations to migrate from the Yanshan Mountains (YSM, ancestral group) to the Taihang Mountains (THM group, the descendent).

Furthermore, the deformation of the Taihang Mountains occurred with the significant uplift of the Tibetan-Himalayan Plateau [14, 121,122,123]. The uplift height of the northern section of the Taihang Mountains was only half of the Western portion of the Yanshan Mountains during the Miocene [121]. The low height of the Taihang Mountains did not develop as a geographical barrier and did not block U. lamellosa migration, from the northwest and northeast, which is supported by the more frequent gene exchange between the three groups (Fig. 4 and Additional file 3: Fig. S2).

In ABC, the divergence between the THM and YM groups was dated back to from 3.54 Ma (ITS) and 3.25 Ma (Aat) (ITS: 95% CI: 5.36 × 105–6.24× 106; Aat: 95% CI: 3.82 × 105–6.28 × 106) (Fig. 3), which corresponds to the Pliocene. The YM group diverged from the THM group (Fig. 3a, b), was a descendant of THM. During the Pliocene, most areas of the Taihang Mountains had only an < 800 m elevation [121].

From the Eocene to the end of the Pliocene, the Yinshan Mountains emerged rapidly, which might have hindered glacial activities and climatic oscillations. Consequently, the U. lamellosa populations of the Taihang Mountains began to migrate northward to form the YM group. The higher gene flow from the THM to YM group (Fig. 4) supported the above points.

Certainly, the demographic history of U. lamellosa had also been influenced by climatic oscillations and historical processes during the Quaternary [14, 124], which was supported by the divergence time of Clade II (2.89 Ma, 95% HPD: 1.24–8.86) (Fig. 2). During this period, the Taihang and Yanshan Mountains were uplifted sharply along with the Himalayan orogeny movement to finally form in the Pleistocene (~ 2.5 Ma B.P.) [16]. Meanwhile, repeated glacial periods had occurred since the Quaternary. These events would further promote differentiation between U. lamellosa populations and lead to the current pattern of this species.

Conclusions

Higher genetic diversity and significant genetic variations occurred in U. lamellosa populations. During glaciation, the regions of Yanshan and Taihang Mountains might be regarded as refugia for this long-lived tree species. The divergence of U. lamellosa intraspecies haplotypes occurred during the Miocene-Pliocene, which was associated with major Tertiary geological and/or climatic events in Northern China. Subsequently, the series of Mountains (e.g., Yanshan and Taihang Mountains) uplifted in Northern China once Tertiary and Quaternary climatic oscillations blocked gene exchange and further promoted the divergence of populations.

In summary, the causes of the phylogeography pattern of U. lamellosa were suggested based on geological evidence and paleoclimate data. The results in this study may provide insights into how the endangered U. lamellosa species might be protected and utilizing. Further, they may play an important role in the exploration of genetic differentiation patterns and dynamic changes of other tree species, while offering a scientific basis toward understanding the evolutionary history and ecological adaption of forests in Northern China.

Availability of data and materials

All sequencing data generated or analyzed during this study has been submitted to NCBI GENEBANK database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/). The accession numbers were MW091502 - MW091519 for the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer regions (ITS) analysis data. And the single-copy gene (Aat) data accession numbers were MW116046 - MW116068. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are also available from the corresponding author (Yiling Wang, ylwangbj@hotmail.com) on reasonable request.

References

  1. Wang J, Wu Y, Ren G, Guo Q, Liu J, Lascoux M. Genetic differentiation and delimitation between ecologically diverged Populus euphratica and P. pruinosa. PLoS One. 2011;6:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Husemann M, Guzman NV, Danley PD, Cigliano MM, Confalonieri VA. Biogeography of Trimerotropis pallidipennis (Acrididae: Oedipodinae): deep divergence across the a mericas. J Biogeogr. 2013;40:261–73.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang J, Källman T, Liu J, Guo Q, Wu Y, Lin K, Lascoux M. Speciation of two desert poplar species triggered by Pleistocene climatic oscillations. Heredity. 2014;112:156–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ivory SJ, Blome MW, King JW, McGlue MM, Cole JE, Cohen AS. Environmental change explains cichlid adaptive radiation at Lake Malawi over the past 1.2 million years. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113:11895–900.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Naidina O, Richards K. Pollen evidence for late Pliocene–Early Pleistocene vegetation and climate change in the North Caucasus, North-Western Caspian Region. Quaternary Int. 2016;409:50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou W, Jin J, Wu J, Chen H, Yang J, Murphy RW, Che J. Mountains too high and valleys too deep drive population structuring and demographics in a Qinghai–Tibetan plateau frog Nanorana pleskei (Dicroglossidae). Ecol Evol. 2017;7:240–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ye JW, Zhang ZK, Wang HF, Bao L, Ge JP. Phylogeography of Schisandra chinensis (Magnoliaceae) reveal multiple Refugia with ample gene flow in Northeast China. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao Y, Pan B, Zhang M. Phylogeography and conservation genetics of the endangered Tugarinovia mongolica (Asteraceae) from Inner Mongolia, Northwest China. PLoS One. 2019;14:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hewitt G. The genetic legacy of the quaternary ice ages. Nature. 2000;405:907–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Qiu YX, Fu CX, Comes HP. Plant molecular phylogeography in China and adjacent regions: tracing the genetic imprints of quaternary climate and environmental change in the world’s most diverse temperate flora. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2011;59:225–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zeng YF, Zhang JG, Abuduhamiti B, Wang WT, Jia ZQ. Phylogeographic patterns of the desert poplar in Northwest China shaped by both geology and climatic oscillations. BMC Evol Biol. 2018;18:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Donoghue M, Bell C, Li J. Phylogenetic patterns in northern hemisphere plant geography. Int J Plant Sci. 2001;162:41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Milne RI, Abbott RJ. The origin and evolution of tertiary relict floras. Adv Bot Res. 2002;38:281-314.

  14. Ye J, Zhang Y, Wang X. Phylogeographic breaks and the mechanisms of their formation in the Sino-Japanese floristic region. Chin J Plant Ecol. 2017;41:1003–19.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bruch A, Utescher T, Mosbrugger V, Gabrielyan I, Ivanov D. Late Miocene climate in the circum-Alpine realm-a quantitative analysis of terrestrial palaeofloras. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 2006;238:270–80.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yang J, Vázquez L, Feng L, Liu Z, Zhao G. Climatic and soil factors shape the demographical history and genetic diversity of a deciduous oak (Quercus liaotungensis) in northern China. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1534.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kohler T, Giger M, Hurni H, Ott C, Wiesmann U, von Dach SW, Maselli D. Mountains and climate change: a global concern. Mt Res Dev. 2010;30:53–6.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tian S, Kou Y, Zhang Z, Yuan L, Li D, López-Pujol J, Fan D, Zhang Z. Phylogeography of Eomecon chionantha in subtropical China: the dual roles of the Nanling Mountains as a glacial refugium and a dispersal corridor. BMC Evol Biol. 2018;18:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Swenson NG, Howard DJ. Clustering of contact zones, hybrid zones, and phylogeographic breaks in North America. Am Nat. 2005;166:581–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chung MY, López-Pujol J, Chung MG. The role of the Baekdudaegan (Korean peninsula) as a major glacial refugium for plant species: a priority for conservation. Biol Conserv. 2017;206:236–48.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cun YZ, Wang XQ. Plant recolonization in the Himalaya from the southeastern Qinghai-Tibetan plateau: geographical isolation contributed to high population differentiation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010;56:972–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pyron RA, Burbrink FT. Hard and soft allopatry: physically and ecologically mediated modes of geographic speciation. J Biogeogr. 2010;37:2005–15.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wang P, Zhang X, Tang N, Liu J, Xu L, Wang K. Phylogeography of Libanotis buchtormensis (Umbelliferae) in disjunct populations along the deserts in Northwest China. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0159790.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang YH, Wang IJ, Comes HP, Peng H, Qiu YX. Contributions of historical and contemporary geographic and environmental factors to phylogeographic structure in a tertiary relict species, Emmenopterys henryi (Rubiaceae). Sci Rep. 2016;6:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fu PC, Ya HY, Liu QW, Cai HM, Chen SL. Out of Refugia: population genetic structure and evolutionary history of the Alpine medicinal plant Gentiana lawrencei var. farreri (Gentianaceae). Front Genet. 2018;9:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Liu H, Gao Q, Zhang F, Khan G, Chen S. Westwards and northwards dispersal of Triosteum himalayanum (Caprifoliaceae) from the Hengduan Mountains region based on chloroplast DNA phylogeography. PeerJ. 2018;6:1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gao Q, Li X, Yang X. Responses of vegetation and primary production in north-south transect of eastern China in global change under land use constraint. Acta Bot Sin. 2003;45:1274–84.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jiang Y, Kang M, Zhu Y, Xu G. Plant biodiversity patterns on Helan Mountain, China. Acta Oecologica. 2007;32:125–33.

    Google Scholar 

  29. López-Pujol J, Zhang FM, Sun HQ, Ying TS, Ge S. Centres of plant endemism in China: places for survival or for speciation? J Biogeogr. 2011;38:1267–80.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Feliner GN. Patterns and processes in plant phylogeography in the Mediterranean Basin. A review. Perspectives in plant ecology. Evol Syst. 2014;16:265–78.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tian B, Liu R, Wang L, Qiu Q, Chen K, Liu J. Phylogeographic analyses suggest that a deciduous species (Ostryopsis davidiana Decne., Betulaceae) survived in northern China during the Last Glacial Maximum. J Biogeography. 2009;36:2148–55.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Liu HZ, Harada K. Geographic distribution and origin of the chloroplast T/C-type in Quercus mongolica var. crispula in northeastern Japan. Plant Species Biol. 2014;29:207–11.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stewart JR, Lister AM, Barnes I, Dalén L. Refugia revisited: individualistic responses of species in space and time. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2010;277:661–71.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Favre A, Päckert M, Pauls SU, Jähnig SC, Uhl D, Michalak I, Muellner-Riehl AN. The role of the uplift of the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau for the evolution of Tibetan biotas. Biol Rev. 2015;90:236–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen H, Huang C. Fagaceae, Ulmaceae and Rhoipteleaceae. Flora China. 1998;22:334–50.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ru W, Zhang G, Bi R, Zhang F, Zhang J. Population structure and pattern of endangered Ulmus lamellosa in Shanxi. Chin J Appl Environ Biol. 2007;13:14–7.

  37. Gu S, Du G. Relationships between geographica1 distribution of Ulmus lamellosa and climate in China. J Inner Mongolia For Coll. 1994;16:28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wang X, Zhang Q, Bi R, Bai Y. Intra-and inter-specific competition of rare and endangered plant Ulmus lamellosa in Shanxi Province of China. Chin J Ecol. 2013;32:1756–61.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bi RC, Zhang J, Su JX. Ecological characters of rare-endangered plant Ulmus lamellosa in Shanxi Province. J Plant Resour Environ. 2002;11:45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Liu L, Chen W, Yan DT, Li J, Liu L, Wang YL. Molecular phylogeography and paleodistribution modeling of the boreal tree species Ulmus lamellosa (T. Wang et SL Chang)(Ulmaceae) in China. Tree Genet Genomes. 2017;13:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wen Z, Xu Z, Zhang H, Feng Y. Chloroplast phylogeography of a desert shrub, Calligonum calliphysa (Calligonum, Polygonaceae), in arid Northwest China. Biochem Syst Ecol. 2015;60:56–62.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang MN, Duan L, Qiao Q, Wang ZF, Zimmer EA, Li ZC, Chen HF. Phylogeography and conservation genetics of the rare and relict Bretschneidera sinensis (Akaniaceae). PLoS One. 2018;13:e0189034.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang Y, Liu K, Bi D, Zhou S, Shao J. Molecular phylogeography of east Asian Boea clarkeana (Gesneriaceae) in relation to habitat restriction. PLoS One. 2018;13:1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ye JW, Guo XD, Wang S, Bai WN, Bao L, Wang HF, Ge JP. Molecular evidence reveals a closer relationship between Japanese and mainland subtropical specimens of a widespread tree species, Acer mono. Biochem Syst Ecol. 2015;60:143–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhou Z, Miwa M, Hogetsu T. Analysis of genetic structure of a Suillus grevillei population in a Larix kaempferi stand by polymorphism of inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR). New Phytol. 1999;144:55–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Stefenon VM, Nodari R, Guerra MP. The genetics and conservation of Araucaria angustifolia: III. DNA extraction protocol and informative capacity of RAPD markers for analysis of genetic diversity in natural populations. Biotemas. 2004;17:47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  47. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protoc Guide Methods Appl. 1990;18:315–22.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Strand A, Leebens-Mack J, Milligan B. Nuclear DNA-based markers for plant evolutionary biology. Mol Ecol. 1997;6:113–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown N, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:2947–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Simmons MP, Ochoterena H. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst Biol. 2000;49:369–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ogden TH, Rosenberg MS. How should gaps be treated in parsimony? A comparison of approaches using simulation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007;42:817–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Rozas J, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:2496–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1451–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Excoffier L, Lischer HE. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and windows. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010;10:564–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rozas J, Ferrer-Mata A, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Guirao-Rico S, Librado P, Ramos-Onsins SE, Sánchez-Gracia A. DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34:3299–302.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Pons O, Petit R. Measwring and testing genetic differentiation with ordered versus unordered alleles. Genetics. 1996;144:1237–45.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Petit J, Duminil J, Fineschi S, Hampe A, Salvini D, Ven-dramin G. Comparative organization of chloroplast, mitochondrial and nuclear diversity in plant populations. Mol Ecol. 2005;14:689–701.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Lin N, Deng T, Moore MJ, Sun Y, Huang X, Sun W, Luo D, Wang H, Zhang J, Sun H. Phylogeography of Parasyncalathium souliei (Asteraceae) and its potential application in delimiting Phylogeoregions in the Qinghai-Tibet plateau (QTP)-Hengduan Mountains (HDM) hotspot. Front Genet. 2018;9:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Bandelt H-J, Forster P, Röhl A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 1999;16:37–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155:945–59.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles. Mol Ecol Notes. 2007;7:574–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Pritcharda JK, Wena X, Falushb D. Documentation for structure software: Version 2.3; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005;14:2611–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics. 1992;131:479–91.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinformatics. 2005;1:47–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Rogers AR, Harpending H. Population growth makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic differences. Mol Biol Evol. 1992;9:552–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Harpending H. Signature of ancient population growth in a low-resolution mitochondrial DNA mismatch distribution. Hum Biol. 1994;66:591–600.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Tajima F. The effect of change in population size on DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989;123:597–601.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Fu YX. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics. 1997;147:915–25.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Rogers AR. Genetic evidence for a Pleistocene population explosion. Evolution. 1995;49:608–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Lloyd A. Fundamentals of molecular evolution. Dynamics. 2000;1:202–4.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Qiu YX, Guan BC, Fu CX, Comes HP. Did glacials and/or interglacials promote allopatric incipient speciation in east Asian temperate plants? Phylogeographic and coalescent analyses on refugial isolation and divergence in Dysosma versipellis. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009;51:281–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Chen J, Huang R, Li G, Hou X, Qin Y, Zhang G, Liu H, Vishnyakova O. Radial growth characteristics of Ulmus pumila var. sabulosa in Otindag sand land, northern China. J Beijing Forestry Univ. 2014;36:41–7.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Feng L, Zheng QJ, Qian ZQ, Yang J, Zhang YP, Li ZH, Zhao GF. Genetic structure and evolutionary history of three Alpine Sclerophyllous oaks in east Himalaya-Hengduan Mountains and adjacent regions. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol. 2007;7:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Bertorelle G, Benazzo A, Mona S. ABC as a flexible framework to estimate demography over space and time: some cons, many pros. Mol Ecol. 2010;19:2609–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Csilléry K, Blum MG, Gaggiotti OE, François O. Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) in practice. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010;25:410–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29:1969–73.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Bouckaert R, Heled J, Kühnert D, Vaughan T, Wu CH, Xie D, Suchard MA, Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. BEAST 2: a software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014;10:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Posada D. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:1253–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods. 2012;9:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Richardson JE, Pennington R, Pennington T, Hollingsworth P, Richardson JE, Pennington RT, Pennington TD, Hollingsworth PM. Rapid diversification of a species-rich genus of neotropical rain forest trees. Science. 2001;293:2242–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Rambaut A, Drummond A, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard M. Tracer v1. 7, 2018; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Rambaut A. FigTree v1. 4.3 software: Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh; 2016. Available from: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/.

  85. Beaumont MA, Zhang W, Balding DJ. Approximate Bayesian computation in population genetics. Genetics. 2002;162:2025–35.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Cornuet JM, Santos F, Beaumont MA, Robert CP, Marin JM, Balding DJ, Guillemaud T, Estoup A. Inferring population history with DIY ABC: a user-friendly approach to approximate Bayesian computation. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:2713–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Cornuet JM, Ravigné V, Estoup A. Inference on population history and model checking using DNA sequence and microsatellite data with the software DIYABC (v1. 0). Bmc Bioinformatics. 2010;11:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Cornuet JM, Pudlo P, Veyssier J, Dehne-Garcia A, Gautier M, Leblois R, Marin JM, Estoup A. DIYABC v2. 0: a software to make approximate Bayesian computation inferences about population history using single nucleotide polymorphism, DNA sequence and microsatellite data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1187–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Beerli P. Comparison of Bayesian and maximum-likelihood inference of population genetic parameters. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:341–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Johnson JA, Tingay RE, Culver M, Hailer F, Clarke ML, Mindell DP. Long-term survival despite low genetic diversity in the critically endangered Madagascar fish-eagle. Mol Ecol. 2009;18:54–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Beerli P, Palczewski M. Unified framework to evaluate panmixia and migration direction among multiple sampling locations. Genetics. 2010;185:313–26.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Chiucchi JE, Gibbs H. Similarity of contemporary and historical gene flow among highly fragmented populations of an endangered rattlesnake. Mol Ecol. 2010;19:5345–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Beerli P, Felsenstein J. Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2001;98:4563–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Udupa S, Baum M. High mutation rate and mutational bias at (TAA)n microsatellite loci in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Mol Gen Genomics. 2001;265:1097–103.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Oksanen J, Blanchet F, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin P, O'Hara R, Simpson G, Solymos P. vegan: Community Ecology Package 2017. R package version 2.4–4; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Li M, Xie D, Xie C, Deng Y, Zhong Y, Yu Y, He X. A Phytogeographic divide along the 500 mm isohyet in the Qinghai-Tibet plateau: insights from the Phylogeographic evidence of Chinese Alliums (Amaryllidaceae). Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Peakall R, Smouse PE. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes. 2006;6:288–95.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Rosenberg MS, Anderson CD. PASSaGE: pattern analysis, spatial statistics and geographic exegesis. Version 2. Molecular ecology notes. Methods Ecol Evol. 2011;2:229–32.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Wang IJ. Examining the full effects of landscape heterogeneity on spatial genetic variation: a multiple matrix regression approach for quantifying geographic and ecological isolation. Evolution. 2013;67:3403–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Adamack AT, Gruber B. PopGenReport: simplifying basic population genetic analyses in R. Methods Ecol Evol. 2014;5:384–7.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Sakaguchi S, Qiu YX, Liu YH, Qi X, Kim SH, Han J, Takeuchi Y, Worth J, Yamasaki M, Sakurai S, et al. Climate oscillation during the quaternary associated with landscape heterogeneity promoted allopatric lineage divergence of a temperate tree Kalopanax septemlobus (Araliaceae) in East Asia. Mol Ecol. 2012;21:3823–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Bai WN, Wang WT, Zhang DY. Contrasts between the phylogeographic patterns of chloroplast and nuclear DNA highlight a role for pollen-mediated gene flow in preventing population divergence in an east Asian temperate tree. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2014;81:37–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Wu H, Xu S, Cui S. The four new records of plant species in Shanxi Province. Shanxi For Sci Tech. 1999;2:20–1.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Teixeira H, Rodríguez-Echeverría S, Nabais C. Genetic diversity and differentiation of Juniperus thurifera in Spain and Morocco as determined by SSR. PLoS One. 2014;9:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Hamrick JL, Godt MW. Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996;351:1291–8.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Bai QQ, Ren GD. Phylogeographic analysis of Episyrphus balteatus ( Diptera: Syrphidae ) in Yanshan-Taihan. Chin J Ecol. 2018;37:157–63.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Ye Z, Zhu G, Damgaard J, Chen X, Chen P, Bu W. Phylogeography of a semi-aquatic bug, Microvelia horvathi (Hemiptera: Veliidae): an evaluation of historical, geographical and ecological factors. Sci Rep. 2016;6:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Frankham R, Briscoe DA, Ballou JD. Introduction to conservation genetics: Cambridge University; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Stefenon VM, Klabunde G, Lemos RPM, Rogalski M, Nodari RO. Phylogeography of plastid DNA sequences suggests post-glacial southward demographic expansion and the existence of several glacial refugia for Araucaria angustifolia. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Yu G, Chen X, Ni J, Cheddadi R, Guiot J, Han H, Harrison SP, Huang C, Ke M, Kong Z. Palaeovegetation of China: a pollen data-based synthesis for the mid-Holocene and last glacial maximum. J Biogeogr. 2000;27:635–64.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Liu JQ, Sun YS, Ge XJ, Gao LM, Qiu YX. Phylogeographic studies of plants in China: advances in the past and directions in the future. J Syst Evol. 2012;50:267–75.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Liu Y, Dietrich CH, Wei C. Genetic divergence, population differentiation and phylogeography of the cicada Subpsaltria yangi based on molecular and acoustic data: an example of the early stage of speciation? BMC Evol Biol. 2019;19:1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Hewitt GM. Some genetic consequences of ice ages, and their role in divergence and speciation. Biol J Linn Soc. 1996;58:247–76.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Zachos JC, Mo P, Sloan LC, Thomas E, Billups K. Trends, Rhythms, and Aberrations in Global Climate 65 Ma to Present. Science (New York, NY). 2001;292:686–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Sun X, Wang P. How old is the Asian monsoon system? Paleobotanical records from China. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 2005;33:11–7.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Heermance RV, Chen J, Burbank DW, Wang C. Chronology and tectonic controls of late tertiary deposition in the southwestern Tian Shan foreland, NW China. Basin Res. 2007;19:599–632.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Ge J, Dai Y, Zhang Z, Zhao D, Li Q, Zhang Y, Yi L, Wu H, Oldfield F, Guo Z. Major changes in east Asian climate in the mid-Pliocene: triggered by the uplift of the Tibetan plateau or global cooling? J Asian Earth Sci. 2013;69:48–59.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Guo ZT, Sun B, Zhang ZS, Peng SZ, Xiao GQ, Ge JY, Hao QZ, Qiao YS, Liang MY, Liu JF, Yin QZ, Wei JJ. A major reorganization of Asian climate by the early Miocene. Clim Past. 2008;4:153–74.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Sun XJ, Wang PX. How old is the Asian monsoon system? -Palaeobotanical records from China. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 2005;222:181–222.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Wang WM, Li JR, Wang JD, He ZJ. Palynofloras from Pliocene balouhe formation and Pleistocene in Zhangqiu county, Shandong province. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica. 2001;41:72–6.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Wu C, Zhang X, Ma Y. The Taihang and Yan mountains rose mainly in quaternary. Norht China Earthquake Sci. 1999;17:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Zhou S, Wang X, Wang J, Xu L. A preliminary study on timing of the oldest Pleistocene glaciation in Qinghai-Xizang plateau. Quat Int. 2006;154–155:44–51.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Royden LH, Burchfiel BC, van der Hilst RD. The geological evolution of the Tibetan plateau. Science. 2008;321:1054–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Cao YN, Comes HP, Sakaguchi S, Chen LY, Qiu YX. Evolution of East Asia's Arcto-tertiary relict Euptelea (Eupteleaceae) shaped by late Neogene vicariance and quaternary climate change. BMC Evol Biol. 2016;16:66.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31970358). The funds were used for the collection of plant materials and to cover basic experimental material acquisition costs.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Huimin Hou and Hang Ye contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Life Science, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen, 041000, P. R. China

    Huimin Hou, Hang Ye, Zhi Wang, Jiahui Wu, Yue Gao, Wei Han, Dongchen Na & Yiling Wang

  2. Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, Canada

    Genlou Sun

Authors
  1. Huimin Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hang Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jiahui Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yue Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wei Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Dongchen Na
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Genlou Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yiling Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HHM was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. YH and WZ analyzed and interpreted the raw data. WJH, GY, and HW completed the plant materials collection and processing. NDC finished the work of language editing. WYL and SGL conceived the main concepts for manuscript and revised the content of the article. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Genlou Sun or Yiling Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Locations and sizes of individuals in the sampled populations of Ulmus lamellose.

Additional file 2: Figure S1.

The maximum likelihood tree of single-copy nuclear gene Aat haplotypes.

Additional file 3: Figure S2.

Results of Bayesian clustering analysis conducted by STRUCTURE. The clustering patterns of ITS (a) and Aat (b) by three clusters (K = 3). The clustering patterns of Aat (c) by four clusters (K = 4).

Additional file 4: Figure S3.

Correlation between geographic distance and pairwise FST/environmental distance for Ulmus lamellosa. (a), (b): relationship estimated by ITS and (c), (d): relationship estimated by Aat.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hou, H., Ye, H., Wang, Z. et al. Demographic history and genetic differentiation of an endemic and endangered Ulmus lamellosa (Ulmus). BMC Plant Biol 20, 526 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02723-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02723-7

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us