Skip to main content
Download PDF

Nitric oxide- induced AtAO3 differentially regulates plant defense and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana

BMC Plant Biology volume 19, Article number: 602 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Exposure of plants to different environmental insults instigates significant changes in the cellular redox tone driven in part by promoting the production of reactive nitrogen species. The key player, nitric oxide (NO) is a small gaseous diatomic molecule, well-known for its signaling role during stress. In this study, we focused on abscisic acid (ABA) metabolism-related genes that showed differential expression in response to the NO donor S-nitroso-l-cysteine (CySNO) by conducting RNA-seq-based transcriptomic analysis.

Results

CySNO-induced ABA-related genes were identified and further characterized. Gene ontology terms for biological processes showed most of the genes were associated with protein phosphorylation. Promoter analysis suggested that several cis-regulatory elements were activated under biotic and/or abiotic stress conditions. The ABA biosynthetic gene AtAO3 was selected for validation using functional genomics. The loss of function mutant atao3 was found to differentially regulate oxidative and nitrosative stress. Further investigations for determining the role of AtAO3 in plant defense suggested a negative regulation of plant basal defense and R-gene-mediated resistance. The atao3 plants showed resistance to virulent Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato strain DC3000 (Pst DC3000) with gradual increase in PR1 gene expression. Similarly, atao3 plants showed increased hypersensitive response (HR) when challenged with Pst DC3000 (avrB). The atgsnor1–3 and atsid2 mutants showed a susceptible phenotype with reduced PR1 transcript accumulation. Drought tolerance assay indicated that atao3 and atnced3 ABA-deficient mutants showed early wilting, followed by plant death. The study of stomatal structure showed that atao3 and atnced3 were unable to close stomata even at 7 days after drought stress. Further, they showed reduced ABA content and increased electrolyte leakage than the wild-type (WT) plants. The quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis suggested that ABA biosynthesis genes were down-regulated, whereas expression of most of the drought-related genes were up-regulated in atao3 than in WT.

Conclusions

AtAO3 negatively regulates pathogen-induced salicylic acid pathway, although it is required for drought tolerance, despite the fact that ABA production is not totally dependent on AtAO3, and that drought-related genes like DREB2 and ABI2 show response to drought irrespective of ABA content.

Background

Nitric oxide (NO)—a small gaseous molecule is considered as the best signaling molecule in both plants and animals and deemed as the “Molecule of the Year” by Science in 1992 [1]. Numerous studies have been focusing on exploring its role in different life processes. Although the source and production of NO in animal cells are well-understood, its production particularly through oxidative pathways in higher plants is not yet known with certainty [2], and scientists have been attempting to identify a proper NO synthase in higher plants. NO is emerging as a key regulator of diverse plant processes such as growth, development, stomatal regulation, senescence, defense, and environmental interactions [2, 3].

Unlike classical signal transduction, NO and its chemical derivatives called reactive nitrogen species (RNS) act through chemical reactions with particular targets in different proteins [4]. S-nitrosocysteine (CySNO) and S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) are considered as two key NO donors as they spontaneously decompose in aqueous solutions releasing NO [5]. CySNO has the ability to infiltrate plant cells via specific l-type amino acid transporters [6], where it can undergo S-nitrosation, a type of post-translational modification in which the NO moiety is covalently attached to solvent-exposed cysteine residues forming S-nitrosothiols (SNOs). When NO is in excess, SNO allows the attachment of NO to glutathione to form GSNO, a relatively stable mobile reservoir of NO [7]. Thus, S-nitrosation is considered as the most relevant mechanism to transfer NO bioactivity that can consequently alter protein function [8]. Many proteins have already been reported to be S-nitrosated, although the list is continuously increasing [9]. These include Arabidopsis salicylic acid (SA)-binding protein 3 [10], non-expressor of pathogenesis-related gene-1 [11], and auxin receptor transport inhibitor response-1 [12]. Similarly, many proteins are regulated through S-nitrosation in response to abiotic stresses, such as AHb1 involved in hypoxia; Rubisco regulating low temperature stress; GAPDH in response to salt stress; APX, GR, and GAPDH in response to high light condition; CAT and GOX in response to cadmium stress (reviewed in [13]). Cellular SNO levels are regulated by a key enzyme GSNO reductase (GSNOR), mutation in which results in compromised growth and plant defense [14].

Drought stress is the main environmental factor that affects growth and productivity of plants worldwide. The damage due to water deficits is even greater than the combined damage of other environmental factors [15]. Drought condition results in evident phenotypic changes such as reduction in the growth of shoot and root and decrease in the diameter of the stem that disrupts plant-water relations with reduced water-use efficiency [16, 17]. The role of NO in the regulation of drought stress is also studied [18, 19]. Reports suggest that NO play key role in drought tolerance by enhancing the antioxidant systems, proline and osmolytes metabolism of several plant species [20, 21]. NO may also help indirectly in drought tolerance by restricting water loss via ABA-mediated stomatal response through various signaling cascades including mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) etc. [22]. NO also play a multi-dimensional role in drought tolerance at molecular level by undergoing DNA methylation etc. Similarly, NO also regulates the expression of several genes responsive to drought stress including transcription factors (TFs) and antioxidant-related genes [23, 24]. Recently in an RNA-seq based transcriptomic study, [25] we reported several drought-related genes that showed differential expression in response to 1 mM CySNO, a NO donor. Similarly, several TFs that are induced by drought stress also showed response to NO. For example, NAC19 TF showed more than 150 fold change to CySNO [26]; this TF is reported to be induced by drought, high salinity and ABA [27]. Similarly, several members of MYB and WRKY TF families have also been reported to be differentially regulated in response to NO [26].

Abscisic acid (ABA), mostly referred to as a “stress hormone,” is the key phytohormone involved in the regulation of plant water status and stomatal movement. ABA biosynthesis involves two major genes zeaxanthin epoxidase [28] and 9-cis-epoxycrotenoid dioxygenase (NCED) [29, 30]. However, the last step that includes the oxidation of abscisic acid aldehyde by the gene family aldehyde oxidase (AO) plays a critical role in ABA synthesis. AOs consist of at least four genes (AAO1, AAO2, AAO3, and AAO4) [31]; among these genes, AAO3 encodes AOδ, which has a high specificity for abscisic aldehyde [32]. Interactions between NO and ABA have also been studied; under drought tolerance, NO has been suggested to induce ABA production that further regulates stomatal responses [33]. This has been further confirmed using a reverse genetics approach wherein NO-deficient double mutant nia1nia2 [KO mutation in nitrate reductase (NR)] was unable to close stomata in response to ABA, suggesting that NO is required for ABA-induced stomatal closure [34]. Another mechanism involving NO-mediated stomatal closure suggests that drought-induced ABA production activates NADPH oxidase, RBOHD, and RBOHF (respiratory burst oxidase homologs D and F) that produce superoxide burst, leading to the activation of NR for NO production that in turn activates mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascade to drive stomatal closure [2].

Previously, we reported thousands of genes that respond to the NO donor CySNO by conducting RNA-seq-based transcriptome analysis [25]. In this study, we focused on CySNO-induced ABA biosynthesis- and signaling-related genes. By using combined in silico and in vivo approaches, we showed the regulatory role of NO-induced ABA genes (specifically AtAO3) in plant defense and drought regulation.

Results

Identification and characterization of ABA-related genes

A total of 26 DEGs (17 up- and 9 down-regulated) involved in ABA metabolism that showed response to CySNO were found in the RNA-seq-based transcriptome. All the genes had at least 2-fold change in expression. The detailed list along with fold change and p-value is provided in Additional file 1. Among the up-regulated DEGs, the highest fold change was recorded for Kin1 (At5g15960), which functions as an anti-freeze protein; according to TAIR description, transcript accumulation of this gene is induced by cold, ABA, and dehydration stress. Similarly, among the down-regulated DEGs, the highest fold change was recorded for AtHVA22H (At1g19950), which is an ABA-responsive gene. A Heatmap was generated to show the expression patterns along with a dendrogram to show the hierarchical clustering of CySNO-induced ABA metabolism-related genes (Fig. 1a). The MDS plot showing dispersion in data revealed that control samples had less dispersion, whereas the CySNO-treated samples showed slightly more dispersion (Fig. 1b). We further analyzed all the CySNO-induced ABA-related genes for GO terms of biological processes and molecular function to identify their fold enrichment and understand their putative functions. We found that, among the GO terms for biological processes, about 11.54% of genes against the total number of studied genes were annotated against protein phosphorylation with 25.8-fold enrichment (Fig. 1c). The highest fold enrichment (70.52 FE) among GO terms for biological processes was found for vitamin biosynthetic processes. Similarly, among the GO terms for molecular processes, the highest number of genes (23.40%) was involved in oxidoreductase activity, whereas the highest fold enrichment (38.23%) was found for kinase inhibitory activity (Fig. 1d).

Fig. 1
figure 1

CySNO-induced ABA metabolism-related genes. Heatmap showing hierarchical clustering and expression values of differentially expressed ABA metabolism-related genes in RNA-seq-based transcriptome in response to 1 mM CySNO. (B) Multi-dimensional scatter (MDS) plot representing the dispersion in data. (C) GO terms for biological processes. (D) GO terms for molecular processes. The values in percentage represent percentage of genes found in the reference genome, whereas the ones in parentheses represent fold enrichment. The numbers in panel A represents three different replicates for buffer and CySNO treated samples. Similarly in panel B S001 to S003 are control samples whereas S004 to S006 are CySNO treated samples.

Full size image

Promoter analysis for the presence of cis-regulatory elements

ABA is mostly associated with abiotic stress conditions; however, significant crosstalk exists between biotic and abiotic stresses. Cao et al. [35] reported that ABA is not only important in mediating abiotic stress responses but also plays a pivotal role in plant defense responses. Therefore, we intended to analyze the promoter regions of CySNO-induced ABA-related genes. Many cis-regulatory elements were found in the promoters of different genes. For convenience, we selected 12 elements that were found in all genes and were involved in both biotic and abiotic stresses; we mapped them by using RSAT. These included CAAT-box that was found in 100% of the sequences; ABRE, found in 50% of the sequences; and GARE, found in 23% of sequences. The WRKY transcription factor-binding site (W-box) was found in 53.84% of sequences, which was the second most frequent cis-element found after CAAT-box. Another motif CGTCA was found in 50% of sequences, whereas MBS was found in 26.9% of the sequences (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Promoter analysis of CySNO-induced ABA metabolism-related genes. Promoter sequences of NO-induced ABA-related genes 1 Kb upstream of the transcription initiation site were retrieved from TAIR (https://www.arabidopsis.org/) and analyzed using CARE to identify cis-regulatory elements present in the respective promoters. Selected cis-regulatory elements were then mapped using RSAT (http://rsat.eead.csic.es/plants/index.php).

Full size image

AtAO3 differentially regulates root and shoot length under oxidative and nitrosative stress conditions

In this study, we focused on aldehyde oxidase (AO) that plays a critical role in ABA synthesis. Among the AO family genes, AtAO2 and AtAO3 showed differential response to NO. As mentioned in the introduction section AtAO3 encodes AOδ, which has a high specificity for abscisic aldehyde [32, 36]. Therefore, we used AtAO3 knocked out (KO) mutant for downstream analysis. The possible role of AtAO3 in plant growth and development was determined by analyzing growth parameters such as CDF and shoot and root length in WT and loss-of-function mutants atao3 and atnced3. The atgsnor1–3 deficient in AtGSNOR1 and atcat2 deficient in AtCATALASE2 were used as control plants owing to their established role in plant growth and defense [14, 37]. The phenotypes of different genotypes under control and different stress conditions can be found in (Fig. 3a). Our results suggested no significant difference in CDF of atao3 under control and nitrosative stress conditions compared to that in wild type (WT) (Fig. 3b). In contrast, under methyl viologen-mediated oxidative stress, atao3 showed significant reduction in CDF (Fig. 3b). The atgsnor1–3 mutant showed increased CDF compared to that in WT (Fig. 3b). Similarly, under nitrosative stress, atao3 showed a donor-dependent response. In the case of CySNO-induced nitrosative stress, no significant difference was noted between atao3 and WT; in contrast, the GSNO-mediated nitrosative stress resulted in significantly longer shoot length in atao3 than that of WT (Fig. 3c). The root length of atao3 was reduced under control and oxidative stress conditions, whereas increased under nitrosative stress (Fig. 3d). Thus, AtAO3 positively regulates root length under control and oxidative stress, whereas negatively regulates it under nitrosative stress condition.

Fig. 3
figure 3

AtAO3 showed differential regulation of shoot and root length under oxidative and nitrosative stress conditions. a Phenotypes of the indicated genotypes. b Cotyledon development frequency after one week under control, H2O2, and MV-mediated oxidative and CysNO- and GSNO-mediated nitrosative stress condition. c Shoot length and d root length of indicated genotypes under control, oxidative, and nitrosative stress conditions. All data points are the means of three replicates with each replicate pooled with 5 plants at least. The background in A was changed for more clarity. The Y-axis in D was interrupted for the better presentation of small values. The white scale bar in A is equal to 4 cm. Significant differences are represented by different letters suggesting differences between means at p ≤ 0.05 (DMRT). The experiment was repeated two times with similar results.

Full size image

We further sought to determine total cellular SNO levels which is considered to comprise S-nitrosated proteins and low molecular weight SNOs including GSNO [38]. Although a reliable method for measuring GSNO levels is not developed yet but it is well-established that in biological systems, GSNO levels are congruent with total SNO levels [39]. For convenience, we selected plants exposed to only CySNO, GSNO and H2O2 as representative for nitrosative and oxidative stress respectively. Our results suggested that under control conditions atnced3 and atao3 showed significant increase (p ≤ 0.05) in cellular SNO levels compared to WT, whereas atcat2 showed similar SNO levels to WT (Fig. 3e). After GSNO-mediated nitrosative stress, the cellular SNO levels in atgsnor1–3 and atao3 were significantly higher (p ≤ 0.05 and p ≤ 0.01 respectively) compared to WT (Fig. 3e). In mutant lines, atcat2 and atnced3, the change in SNO levels was not significant. Similarly, CySNO treated plants showed reduced SNO levels in WT, whereas the SNO contents were increased in atgsnor1–3. The cellular SNO levels in atcat2, atnced3 and atao3 were almost similar under CySNO mediated nitrosative stress condition (Fig. 3e). In contrast, after H2O2-mediated oxidative stress, the cellular SNO levels in almost all genotypes were reduced compared to WT (Fig. 3e).

AtAO3 negatively regulates plant basal defense

Whether AtAO3 is involved in basal defense was determined by inoculating WT, atao3, atnced3, atgsnor1–3, and atsid2 plants with virulent Pst DC3000 to assess the phenotypic response of all the genotypes toward virulent pathogens. We found that, at 6 days post-inoculation (dpi), atao3 showed resistant phenotype, whereas atgsnor1–3 and atsid2 showed susceptible phenotype (Fig. 4a). We further investigated pathogen growth in WT and atao3 along with relevant control mutants. Our results suggested that, at 0 dpi, no significant difference in bacterial growth was noted in all genotypes studied; however, at 1 and 2 dpi, atao3 showed a significant reduction in pathogen growth compared to that in WT (Fig. 4b). Further, atgsnor1–3 and atsid2 showed increased pathogen growth at 1 and 2 dpi. However, no significant difference in pathogen growth was noted between atnced3 and WT (Fig. 4b). The response of plants during biotrophic pathogen attack is mostly mediated by the key plant hormone SA [40]. Therefore, we aimed to determine the role of AtAO3 in SA pathway signaling by determining transcript accumulation of PR1 and PR2, the key marker genes related to the SA pathway. At early time points, atao3 showed reduced transcript accumulation of PR1; however, at 48 h of inoculation, a robust increase in transcript accumulation of PR1 gene compared to that in WT was noted (Fig. 4c). Moreover, atgsnor1–3 and atsid2 showed reduced transcript accumulation compared to that in WT at all-time points. All the genotypes showed reduced PR2 expression over time compared to that in WT (Additional file 2).

Fig. 4
figure 4

AtAO3 negatively regulates basal defense. a Symptom development at 6 dpi. b Pathogen growth from infiltrated leaves. c Relative PR1 expression after attempted virulent Pst DC3000 at 5 × 105 colony forming units (CFU) mL− 1. The data points in panel (b) are the mean of five replicates, whereas those in panel (c) are the mean of three replicates. Background in panel (a) was modified for more clarity and white bar represents scale bar equal to 1 cm. The Y-axis of panel (c) was interrupted to clarify the small values. The experiments were repeated at least three times. Error bars represent ±SE. Different letters represents significant differences between means at p ≤ 0.05 (DMRT).

Full size image

AtAO3 negatively regulates R-gene-mediated resistance

Plants use R genes encoded by the nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeats (NBS-LRRs) that recognize pathogen-released effector molecules, thereby inducing R-gene-mediated resistance [41]. The ultimate fate of this resistance is HR, at the site of infection that restricts pathogens within the infected tissues. We inoculated WT, atao3 mutants, and relevant controls with Pst DC3000 (avrB), and HR was observed using trypan blue staining. Our results suggested increased HR in atao3, followed by that in atnced3 and atgsnor1–3, whereas atsid2 showed almost no HR after 12 h post-inoculation (Fig. 5a). However, increased HR was observed for atgsnor1–3, followed by atao3 and atnced3 after 24 h of inoculation (Fig. 5a). We further investigated transcript accumulation in infected leaves following pathogen inoculation and found that atao3 showed increased PR1 expression at 6, 12, and 24 h after inoculation (Fig. 5b). PR1 transcript accumulation was reduced for atsid2 and atgsnor1–3 (Fig. 5b). In atao3, PR2 transcript accumulation increased only at 12 h post-inoculation (Fig. 5c).

Fig. 5
figure 5

AtAO3 negatively regulates R-gene-mediated resistance. a ataao3 showed induced HR after Pst DC3000 (avrB) inoculation. b and c Relative transcript accumulation of PR1 and PR2 genes analyzed using quantitative real time PCR (qPCR) and (d) SNO measurement after Pst DC3000 (avrB) inoculation. The white small bar in WT mock plant in panel (a) represents scale bar and is equal ot 100 μM. The Y-axis of panel (b) was interrupted to clarify the small values. The expression was normalized against constitutively expressed Actin. Error bars represent ±SE. Different letters represents significant differences between means at p ≤ 0.05 (DMRT).

Full size image

We also studied the cellular SNO levels in atao3 and mutant lines used as comparative controls such as atgsnor1–3 and atsid2 after Pst DC3000 (avrB) inoculation. Our results suggested that the cellular SNO levels of atao3 were significantly higher overtime compared to WT (Fig. 5d). Similarly, atgsnor1–3 were slightly reduced at 0 h remains same to WT at 12 h while significantly increased at 24 h of pathogen inoculation. In case of atsid2 the cellular SNO levels were increased at 0 and 24 h of inoculation while no significant difference was observed at 12 h post inoculation (Fig. 5d).

atao3 shows differential response to systemic acquired resistance

Systemic acquired resistance (SAR), an important defense system, is induced by signals initiated at the site of infection to other plant parts. NO, and ROS are reportedly involved in SAR activation [42, 43]. Therefore, we investigated whether AtAO3 played a role in SAR and inoculated plants with Pst DC3000 (avrB) at 5 × 106 CFU. Leaf samples were collected from systemic leaves after pathogen inoculation, and transcript accumulation of key SAR marker genes such as PR1, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDH), and azelaic acid inducer (AZI) was analyzed over time. The PR1 gene transcript accumulation was significantly higher after 6 h and 12 h in the systemic leaves of atao3, followed by that in atnced3, compared to WT (Fig. 6a). In contrast, mock-treated plants showed reduced PR1 transcript accumulation in all genotypes studied (Fig. 6a). Similarly, atgsnor1–3 and atsid2 barely showed PR1 expression (Fig. 6a). PR2 expression was high at 6 h in atao3 leaves, whereas no significant difference was found at other time points (Fig. 6b). Furthermore, G3PDH showed increased transcript accumulation at 12 h after inoculation in atao3 systemic leaves (Fig. 6c). The susceptible mutant lines atgsnor1–3 and atsid2 showed decreased expression compared to that in WT, whereas atnced3 showed maximum transcript accumulation at 12 h after inoculation (Fig. 6c). Similarly, another SAR marker gene AtAZI was differentially expressed over time. At early time points, i.e., 0, 6, and 12 h after inoculation, atao3 showed increased AZI expression compared to that in WT, whereas its expression was reduced at 24 h (Fig. 6d). Similar to G3DPH, AZI showed increased transcript accumulation in atnced3 at 12 h (Fig. 6d). Both atgsnor1–3 and atsid2 showed decreased AZI expression over time (Fig. 6d).

Fig. 6
figure 6

AtAO3 negatively regulates systemic acquired resistance (SAR). Relative transcript accumulation of (a) PR1 gene, (b) PR2 gene, (c) G3DPH, and (d) AZI genes analyzed using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) in systemic leaves after Pst DC3000 (avrB) inoculation. The Y-axis of panels (a) and (b) was interrupted to clarify the small values. The expression was normalized against constitutively expressed Actin. Error bars represent ±SE (n = 3). Significant differences are represented by different letters (p ≤ 0.05) calculated by DMRT.

Full size image

AtAO3 is required for drought tolerance through possible ABA-mediated stomatal regulation

AtAO3 is involved in the very last step of ABA biosynthesis. ABA-induced NO production is known to regulate stomatal movements during drought stress [33, 44]. Therefore, we intended to investigate the possible role of NO-induced AtAO3 in drought stress regulation. About 4-week-old WT, atnced3, and atao3 mutants were subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 7 to 10 days. Both atao3 and atnced3 showed severe drought symptoms compared to WT (Fig. 7a). Mild drought symptoms such as wilting of leaves were noted earlier (at 3 days of stress) in atao3 and atnced3 mutant plants than in WT.

Fig. 7
figure 7

AtAO3 is required for drought tolerance. a Phenotypes of the indicated genotypes under control, drought, and recovery stage. b Stomatal structure in the indicated genotypes under control and drought stress. c ABA contents (from fresh samples) in response to drought stress and control conditions. d Electrolyte leakage (%) under control and drought conditions (e) Survival percentage after re-watering the plants for 24 h. The white bar in panel A represents scale bar and is equal to 4 cm while in B is equal ot 200 μM. Error bars represents ±SE. Significant differences are represented by asterisks (Student t-test). * represents p < 0.05, ** represents p < 0.01 and *** represents p ≤ 0.001.

Full size image

Stomatal regulation plays a key role in limiting water loss during drought stress. We hypothesized that the rapid drought symptoms such as wilting might be because of the inability of atao3 to close stomata. Therefore, we visualized the stomatal structure in WT and atao3 lines under control and drought-stressed plants. WT plants showed closed stomata, whereas the stomata of both atnced3 and atao3 remained open (Fig. 7b). Furthermore, the stomatal opening was quantified using ImageJ program. Our results suggested that, at 7 days post drought (dpd), the atao3 mutant showed significantly (p ≤ 0.0001) higher number of opened stomata compared to WT (Additional file 3).

Similarly, drought-induced ABA production is critical for stomatal regulation [45]. AtAO3 is involved in the last step of ABA biosynthesis; thus, theoretically, the loss of function of this gene should produce less ABA compared to that in WT. Therefore, we determined ABA levels in WT and knockout lines atao3 and atnced3 under control and drought stress. Our results suggested that, under control conditions, atnced3 showed reduced ABA contents compared to that in WT, whereas no significant difference was found between atao3 and WT. In contrast, at 7 dpd, significant (p ≤ 0.05) reduction in ABA contents was noted in atao3 and atnced3 compared to that in WT (Fig. 7c). We further investigated the cell membrane stability or electrolyte leakage and found that, at 0 dpd, no significant difference was noted in electrolyte leakage among all genotypes, including WT. However, at 7 dpd, significant increase in electrolyte leakage was observed in atao3 and atnced3 mutants (Fig. 7d). We further determined the recovery rate of different genotypes; we re-watered the plants and observed them after 24 h. We found that the survival rate of atao3 and atnced3 was less than that of WT (Fig. 7e). All these results suggests that AtAO3 is required for ABA production specifically under drought condition. The opened stomata in atao3 KO line after drought stress suggested that their closing ability was impaired partially because of low ABA production in atao3 and atnced3 under drought conditions.

Transcript accumulation of ABA biosynthesis and drought signaling genes

Next, we determined whether the loss of function of AtAO3 affects other ABA biosynthetic genes. We selected the key biosynthetic genes such as AtABA2, AtABA3, and AtNCED3 and analyzed them by using real-time qPCR. Our results suggested that except ABA3, which showed no significant difference compared to that in WT, the remaining ABA biosynthesis-related genes showed reduced transcript accumulation in atao3 plants compared to WT (Fig. 8 A, C, and G). However, genes that were involved in ABA signaling or drought regulation such as AtABI2, AtDREB2, and AtAPX1 showed increased transcript accumulation in atao3 and atnced3 compared to that in WT (Fig. 8 B, D, E, and F). AtDREB1showed no significant difference in transcript accumulation after drought stress compared to WT (Fig. 8d).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Expression of ABA biosynthesis and drought signaling-related genes in the indicated genotypes. Relative expression of a AtABA3, b AtABI2, c AtABA2, d AtDREB1, e AtDREB2, f AtAPX1, and g AtNCED3. The experiments were repeated at least three times. Error bars represent ±SE. Significance differences are represented by asterisks (Student t-test). * represents p < 0.05, ** represents p < 0.01 and *** represents p ≤ 0.001.

Full size image

Discussion

Both ROS and RNS are redox-active molecules that are produced after environmental insults. These molecules have the ability to inactivate cellular antioxidant system, thereby changing the redox status of cells [46]. The latter is less explored and has gained attention of scientists in the last couple of decades because of their remarkable regulatory role in various plant processes. Produced from NO, a small redox-active molecule having high diffusivity, RNS regulates many cellular processes such as stomatal regulation, seed germination, disease resistance, and plant responses to abiotic stresses [33, 47,48,49]. NO has the ability to control physiological processes directly by regulating the transcriptional machinery of certain genes. The global changes in gene expression in response to NO has been investigated using microarrays [50], RNA-seq [25, 51], and qRT-PCR [52].

The Arabidopsis AO gene family consists of 4 alleles (AAO1–4); they are considered vital in ABA biosynthesis as they catalyze the last step in ABA biosynthesis involving the oxidation of abscisic aldehyde [36]. In this study, we focused on ABA-metabolism-related genes in A. thaliana that showed differential response to CySNO, a common NO donor by using RNA-seq-based transcriptomic analysis. The MDS plot was generated to detect dispersion in data, and we found that one replicate in treated samples showed dispersion, which might be because of low basal levels of gene expression in that replicate (Fig. 1b). All the genes were involved in either ABA biosynthesis or signaling (Fig. 9). Interestingly, most of the ABA biosynthesis-related genes were down-regulated, whereas most of the signaling genes were up-regulated in response ot NO donor (Fig. 9). Previous studies also showed differential expression of ABA-related genes. A study involving ozone treatment [53] reported about 14 genes involved in ABA metabolism that were also found in our transcriptome. This indicates that significant crosstalk exists between genes responding to ROS and NO, as suggested by [54]. The GO terms for biological processes revealed most of the genes (11.5443%) associated with protein phosphorylation (Fig. 1c), which is one of the important post-translational modification that regulates protein function in response to internal and external stimuli [55]. This further supports the notion that NO can potentially cause substantial post-translational changes in some proteins. NO is believed to transfer its bioactivity in biological systems through S- nitrosation [38]. Similarly, in GO terms for molecular function, the majority of the genes (23.40%) were associated with oxido-reductase activity (Fig. 1d). Oxido-reductases are key enzymes that regulate NO production and/or signaling [48, 56].

Fig. 9
figure 9

MapMan analysis showing up- and down-regulated ABA-related genes. Schematic presentation of ABA biosynthesis and signaling during drought conditions. The color key represents a scale of fold change from − 0.5 to 1. Red color represents up-regulated, whereas blue color represents down-regulated ABA-related genes in response to CySNO.

Full size image

Many cis-regulatory elements were found in the promoter regions of CySNO-induced ABA metabolism-related genes at variable distances from the transcriptional start point. These include ABRE (TACGTG) involved in the regulation of drought response genes [57], EIRE (TTCGACC) involved in maximal elicitor-mediated activation of genes [58], and ERE (ATTTCAAA, ethylene-responsive elements regulating ethylene-mediated responses as the name indicates) [59]. Some of the important drought response genes are MBS (CAACTG MYB-binding site), which is involved in drought stress regulation [60], and W-box (TTGACC), the binding site for WRKY transcription factors [61] (Fig. 2), indicating that CySNO-induced ABA-related genes might be involved in the mechanistic control of genes associated with biotic and abiotic stresses. Bioinformatics approaches have revealed that NO-responsive genes contain a significantly higher number of transcription-binding sites in their promoters [24].

The atao3 mutant showed differential response to oxidative and nitrosative stress in terms of shoot and root growth (Fig. 3a, c, d). The reduction in shoot and root growth under oxidative environment is mostly attributed to the excess accumulation of ROS. ROS and RNS are known to be produced in response to environmental stresses [33, 62]. In a study Vanderauwera et al. [63] showed that higher sensitivity to oxidative stress in plants is probably attributed to the high levels of peroxides in addition to other types of ROS. Increased shoot and root growth in atao3 under nitrosative stress might be attributed to the possible positive role of NO in seed germination and seedling growth, as reviewed extensively by Kopyra and Gwozdz [64]. Similarly, NO has been suggested to break seed dormancy and promote plant growth, even better than GA3 [65]. Similarly, by using various NO donors, Giba et al. [66] revealed the possible role of NO in phytochrome-controlled germination of Empress Tree (Paulownia tomentosa). This is further supported by increased SNO levels in atao3 under control and GSNO-mediated nitrosative stress condition while reduced under oxidative stress conditions (Fig. 3e). In contrast, CySNO treated plants showed reduced SNO levels in all genotypes compared to GSNO treated plants, however, compared to WT CySNO treated atnced3 and atao3 showed increased SNO accumulation (Fig. 3e). It is somehow strange that both CySNO and GSNO treated plants showed significantly different behavior in accumulation of SNOs, however, this might be due to different NO releasing capacity of both NO donors as suggested by He et al. [67].

As discussed earlier, the promoter analysis of ABA-related genes suggested the presence of cis-regulatory elements involved in defense; therefore, we investigated the role of AtAO3 in basal and R-gene-mediated resistance. Our results showed that AtAO3 negatively regulates both basal and R-gene-mediated resistance. The reduced pathogen growth in atao3 followed by increased PR1 gene expression (Fig. 4a, b) suggests that AtAO3 negatively regulates pathogen-induced SA pathway. Transcript accumulation of another SA pathway-related gene PR2 was reduced compared to that of PR1. This might be because of increased PR1 expression that already contributed to resistance against pathogens and might partly be a strategy to store the extra metabolic energy that would have been used by PR2 induction. We also observed increased HR and PR1 expression in response to the avirulent pathogen (Pst DC3000 expressing avrB effector) in atao3 plants, indicating that AtAO3 also negatively regulates R-gene-mediated resistance. This strongly supports the hypothesis that AtAO3 negatively regulates pathogen-induced SA pathway as the SA-deficient mutant atsid2 showed severe symptom development, increased pathogen growth with reduced PR1 expression in response to virulent Pst DC3000 (Fig. 4a, b, c), and reduced HR and PR1 expression in response to avirulent Pst DC3000 (Fig. 5a, b). Previous studies also suggested resistance of ABA-deficient mutants in response to biotrophic pathogens [45]. Extensive studies have established that plants and their pathogens continuously compete for survival and food. The pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) are recognized by plant pattern recognition receptors, leading to PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI) [41]. However, some pathogens have evolved and evade the PTI with modified PAMPs, causing effector-triggered susceptibility. As a part of this strategy, plants have evolved complex defense systems, including plant disease resistance (R) genes encoded by the NBS-LRR to recognize pathogen-released effector molecules [41]. Therefore, R-gene-mediated resistance is conferred by the interaction between R-gene product and avr that serves to limit pathogen growth inside the host plants, mostly resulting in HR [68, 69]. Disruption of the SA pathway by mutation (e.g., NahG and sid2) remarkably compromises resistance toward pathogens [70]. The expression of SAR marker genes suggests that AtAO3 might have no significant role in SAR. SA, a small phenolic compound, is considered to play a critical role in plant defense. SA has been shown to be required for pathogen recognition, subsequent establishment of local resistance, and finally transmitting signals to the systemic tissues and whole plants [71, 72].

ABA, also known as the “stress hormone,” is a phytohormone, which plays a key role in the regulation of water status and stomatal movement to protect plants under adverse drought conditions [45]. Furthermore, ABA has been shown to positively affect tolerance to particular stresses either by exogenous application or through overexpressing genes that are involved in ABA biosynthesis [73]. Therefore, we intended to determine the role of ABA biosynthetic gene AtAO3 toward drought tolerance. Our results suggested that both atao3 and atnced3 mutants showed rapid wilting, leading to death of plants at 7 days post drought (dpd; Fig. 7a). Similarly, both atao3 and atnced3 showed significantly low ABA contents compared to those in WT under drought conditions (Fig. 7c). Earlier wilting in atao3 and atnced3 might be due to their inability to close stomata as a part of the adaptation toward the external environment. This was confirmed further when we observed the stomatal structure and found that, in both atao3 and atnced3 plants, stomata remained open even after 7 dpd (Fig. 7b) and supported by the quantification of stomatal opening (Additional file 3). This was partially expected as AtAO3 is involved in ABA biosynthesis, which is mainly considered for the regulation of stomatal movement. Similarly, Christmann et al. [74] reported that ABA is involved in the closure of stomata during drought conditions. This is mainly to limit water loss. This was further supported by our results that the loss of function mutants atao3 and atnced3 showed rapid and excessive water loss compared to WT. The results of previous studies also suggest that ABA-controlled processes are significant for the survival of plants, and ABA-deficient mutants are susceptible to water stress [75, 76]. Notably, the ABA contents in atao3 and WT were almost similar; however, under drought conditions, ABA contents of atao3 were significantly reduced (Fig. 7c), suggesting that AtAO3 might be required for ABA biosynthesis only under drought conditions.

We further intended to determine how the loss of function mutation in AtAO3 affects the expression of other drought stress-related genes. We found that except ABA3, which showed no significant difference in transcript accumulation between atao3 and WT, the remaining ABA biosynthesis-related genes such as AtABA2 and AtNCED3 showed reduced transcript accumulation compared to that of WT (Fig. 8 C, G). However, even in the absence of AtAO3, some ABA production was noted, indicating that, in the absence of AtAO3, other genes such as AtAO2 can perform this function. Genes that are mostly involved in ABA signaling during drought conditions such as AtABI2, AtDREB2, and AtAPX1 showed induced expression, indicating that these genes respond to drought stress irrespective of the amount of ABA in cells; therefore, they are considered as the key modulators of drought stress [77,78,79].

Considering that significant crosstalk occurs between redox-active molecules produced in response to biotic and/or abiotic stress conditions, determining the role of NO in modulating these insults would be interesting. NO, because of its physiochemical properties, is a steering molecule that has the potential to regulate the twin (ROS and RNS) redox molecules. However, the mechanistic control by NO seems to be considerably complex as NO can directly control the expression of certain genes and has significant potential to change protein function through post-translational modifications such as S- nitrosation [8], tyrosine nitration [80], and methylation [81]. The response of ABA-metabolism-related genes toward NO donor is an indication that NO directly and/or indirectly is involved in drought modulation. However, a thorough investigation is required to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

Conclusion

This study suggests a possible role of NO in the regulation of ABA metabolism in plants. Further investigation on the role of ABA biosynthetic gene AtAO3 showed differential role towards biotic and abiotic stress conditions. AtAO3 negatively regulates pathogen-induced SA pathway whereas positively regulates drought stress. The biochemical analysis suggested that under normal conditions AtAO3 may not be required for ABA production however it is required during drought condition as atao3 plants showed a significant reduction in ABA contents compared to that in WT plants. We also suggested that drought-related genes such as DREB2 and ABI2 showed response to drought irrespective of ABA contents.

Methods

Transcriptome-wide identification and analysis of ABA metabolism-related genes

Previously, we reported many differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in response to 1 mM CySNO in an RNA-seq-based transcriptomic study Hussain et al. [25]. In this study, we focused on CySNO-induced (both up- and down-regulated until stated otherwise) ABA biosynthesis/metabolism-related genes. The details of plant materials and methodology of RNA extraction and RNA-seq analysis is described in Hussain et al. [25]. Briefly, RNA was extracted from fresh leaves by using RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen USA) as per manufacturer’s standard protocol. After RNA integrity and purity were assessed using a Bio-analyzer (Agilent® 2100 Bio-analyzer; Agilent), RNA libraries were generated using TruSeq™ RNA library prep kit (Illumina USA). Next, double-stranded cDNA libraries were synthesized and quantified using KAPA library quantification kit (Illumina USA) and processed for sequencing by using a HiSeq-2500 sequencing machine (Illumina USA). The high-quality reads were identified by processing the raw sequence reads by using a threshold level of Q20 > 40%. The reads with Q20 < 40%, or those with 10% ambiguous bases were discarded [82]. The high-quality reads were then aligned against A. thaliana genome by using TopHat with default parameters [83]. The gene annotation was obtained from Ensembl [84], and abundance of the transcripts was confirmed using Cufflinks package v2.2.1 [85]. The expression levels of genes and transcripts under control and treated conditions were calculated using Cuffdiff v.2.2.1 [85] to identify the significant DEGs (Q < 0.05), which were then processed for further analysis.

All the DEGs were mapped against the Arabidopsis database by using MapMan 3.6.0RC as described in [26]. Based on BIN numbers (17.1.1, 17.1.1.1.1, 17.1.2, and 17.1.3) that are specified for ABA metabolism, we identified about 26 DEGs (17 up- and 9 down-regulated) that were involved in ABA metabolism. All the genes were manually checked, and duplicate entries were removed. A heatmap was generated from FPKM values by using R version 3.3.1.R (https://www.r-project.org/) to visualize the differences in expression values between treated and control samples, and a dendrogram representing the hierarchical clustering was developed. A multi-dimensional scattering (MDS) plot was also generated from the FPKM values of control and CySNO-treated samples in triplicates to visualize dispersion in the data by using R.

Promoter analysis

ABA-related genes are mostly considered to be involved in abiotic stress only. However, the response of these genes toward NO donors can make them potential targets for biotic stress as well. Therefore, we intended to study the promoter region of CySNO-induced ABA metabolism-related genes for the presence of cis-regulatory elements. The promoter sequences of all these genes 1 Kb upstream of the transcription initiation site were retrieved from TAIR (https://www.arabidopsis.org/) and analyzed using PlantCARE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/). Many cis-regulatory elements were found in the promoter region, of which few important ones that were involved in both biotic and abiotic stress conditions were selected; they were then mapped using a pattern matching tool in Regulatory Sequence Analysis Tool [86] package by using default parameters. The resolution of the resultant map was adjusted using Microsoft Power point (https://www.office.com/) and Adobe Photoshop CS6 (https://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop.html). AtAAO3 (AT2G27150) was selected for the in vivo analysis owing to its key role in ABA biosynthesis pathway. It regulates the last committed step of ABA biosynthesis in which it converts abscisic aldehyde to ABA.

Plant material and growth conditions

Seeds of Arabidopsis, wild type (WT) Col-0, atnced3 and ataao3 (AT2G27150), loss-of-function mutants, were obtained from the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre (NASC) (http://arabidopsis.info/). The atgsnor1–3 deficient in ATGSNOR1 was kindly provided by Professor Gary Loake, the University of Edinburgh. Plants were grown either on 1/2 Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium or soil at 23 ± 2 °C, under long-day conditions (16 h light and 8 h dark). Plants were genotyped at the rosette stage (4-week-old plants) to identify homozygous lines. Arabidopsis WT and all other lines used in the study were of the Col-0 genetic background. Changes in the cellular levels of ROS and RNS affect metal-containing enzymes such as peroxidases and catalases [87, 88]. Since we intended to determine the role of AtAO3 gene under redox stress conditions (oxidative and nitrosative) in plants, we used the atgsnor1–3 and atcat2 mutants as a comparative control owing to their established reported role in plant immunity and growth [14, 37]. Similarly, the atsid2 mutant deficient in SA pathway was used as control for SA-mediated defense pathway [89], and atnced3 deficient in AtNCED3 was used for ABA-related defense response [90].

Redox stress assay

The possible role of AtAAO3 in redox stress mediation was determined by subjecting WT and KO mutants to both nitrosative and oxidative stress conditions as described earlier [91]. Briefly, the seeds of Arabidopsis WT and atao3 seeds were surface-sterilized with 50% bleach solution containing 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma Aldrich, USA) for 5 min. The seeds were then rinsed with sterile distilled water three times and stratified at 4 °C for 24 h to obtain uniform germination. They were then germinated on 1/2 strength MS medium supplemented with 2 mM H2O2, 1 μM methyl viologen (oxidative stress), and 1 mM each of GSNO and CySNO (nitrosative stress) in triplicate with at least eight seeds in each replicate. The cotyledon development frequency (CDF, the number of green developed seeds) was recorded after 1 and 2 weeks, and root and shoot length were recorded after 2 weeks of treatment.

Pathogen growth and inoculation

Two types of bacterial strains, virulent and avirulent Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) were used in this study. Virulent Pst DC3000 and avirulent Pst DC3000 expressing the avrB effector were grown, maintained, and inoculated, as described previously [48]. Briefly, both the bacterial strains were cultured on petri plates containing Luria-Bertani (LB)-agar media with relevant antibiotics for selection (100 mg/mL rifampicin for virulent Pst DC3000 and kanamycin (50 mg/mL) and rifampicin for Pst DC3000 (avrB). The plates were then incubated at 28 °C overnight, following which a single colony was transferred to LB broth and incubated at 28 °C overnight with continuous shaking. Bacteria were then harvested by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 3 min in desktop centrifuge (LaboGene Model no 1524 Korea), re-suspended in 10 mM MgCl2, and syringe-infiltrated into the abaxial side of leaves at a concentration of 5 × 105 CFU for virulent whereas at 5 × 106 CFU for avirulent strains. Plants were inoculated in triplicates, and three leaves in each plant were inoculated. Control plants were only infiltrated with buffer (10 mM MgCl2). Plants were regularly observed for disease symptoms, and leaf samples were collected over time for further analysis.

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis

The quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis was performed as described by [61]. Briefly, total RNA was extracted from the inoculated leaves by using Trizol® (Invitrogen, USA) as per manufacturer’s protocol. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using the DiaStar™ RT kit (SolGent, Korea) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The synthesized cDNA was then used as a template in a real-time PCR machine (Illumina, USA) to study plant defense marker genes, such as PR, which are involved in SA-dependent defense pathway. The detailed list of these genes and their primer sequences are provided in Additional file 4. PCR was performed using the EcoTM real-time PCR machine by using 2× Real-time PCR Master Mix (including SYBR® Green I BioFACT™ Korea) along with 100 ng of templatse DNA and 10 nM of each primer in a final volume of 20 mL. A “no template control” was used as a negative control that contained distilled water instead of template DNA. Two-step PCRs were performed for 40 cycles under the following conditions: polymerase activation at 95 °C for 15 min, denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, and annealing and extension at 60 °C for 30 s. The melting curves were assessed at 60–95 °C for verification of amplicon specificity for each primer pair, and actin was used as an internal reference gene.

Histological staining

The hypersensitive response (HR) of WT and atao3 plants toward Pst DC3000 (avrB) infiltration was quantified using trypan blue histological staining as described by Koch and Slusarenko [92]. For this, the leaves of WT and atao3 plants inoculated with Pst DC3000 (avrB) were stained with lactophenol trypan blue, following which they were de-stained in saturated chloral hydrate. Leaves were then mounted on glass slides in 70% glycerol, and images were captured using a light microscope. Cell death was quantified (arbitrary units) in terms of the intensity of trypan blue staining by using Adobe Photoshop CS6, as described previously [48].

SNO measurement

Cellular SNO levels after various stresses were assessed as described earlier [61]. Briefly, for plants grown on ½ MS media under oxidative or nitrosative stress (mentioned in detail under subsection “Redox stress assay”), samples were collected 2 weeks after exposure to respective (oxidative and nitrosative) stress conditions. For measuring SNO levels in plants after pathogenicity; 4 weeks old plants were used and samples were collected at 0, 12 and 24 h of attempted Pst DC3000 (avrB) inoculation. Plant samples (two leaves each pooled as one replicate) were ground in liquid nitrogen and homogenized in PBS buffer. The samples were then centrifuged at 15000 rpm in a refrigerated centrifuge (1736 R LABOGENE Korea; rotor GRF-L-m2.0–30) for 10 min. The supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube and centrifuged again at 15000 rpm for 5 min. About 100 ul of supernatant was injected to the purge vessel of NO analyzer (NOA- 280i, Sievers, and USA) and the peak value was recorded. Total protein contents were determined in all plant samples using the Bradford assay [93]. A standard curve was constructed to measure protein concentration in samples by using Optical density (OD595) of bovine serum albumin (BSA) standards. The SNO contents (pmol. μg− 1 protein) in samples were calculated by comparing the peak values for each sample with values obtained for the various CySNO standards.

Drought tolerance assays

About 4-week-old plants were used for drought stress by using the water withholding method [94]. Experimental error was avoided by irrigating the plants with an equal amount of water, and trays were transferred to dried tray bases after complete absorption of water. Plants were subjected to drought for 7 to 10 days. Control plants were watered regularly. The parameters such as electrolyte leakage and stomatal regulation were studied. Transcript accumulation of genes that were potentially involved in drought stress mediation was also studied. The plants were re-watered after 10 days, and the rate of recovery was calculated after 24 h of watering. All the genotypes were assessed for their phenotypic response during drought stress.

Measurement of electrolyte leakage for cell death quantification

Ion or electrolyte leakage was measured as described by [95] with some modifications. Leaf samples were collected from control and drought stress-treated plants at 0 and 7 days post-drought (dpd) treatment. Leaf discs (1 cm in diameter) were collected in triplicates with at least three leaf discs (from different leaves) in each replicate. The leaf discs were rinsed with deionized water to remove any surface electrolytes and transferred to glass tubes having 5 mL de-ionized water. The tubes were kept at room temperature for 24 h with continuous gentle shaking, and the electrolyte leakage of each sample was measured using a portable conductivity meter (HURIBA Twin Cond B-173; Japan); this was called electrolyte leakage 1 (EL1). The samples were then autoclaved at 120 °C for 20 min and cooled to room temperature (~ 25 °C). The electrolyte leakage of each sample was measured again (EL2). The EL (%) was measured as follows:

EL (%) = (EL1/EL2) × 100.

Stomatal structure analysis

To determine whether AtAO3 is involved in stomatal regulation, we investigated the stomatal structure of WT and atao3 mutants under control and drought conditions, as described previously [96]. Briefly, a thin layer of transparent nail polish was applied on the abaxial surface of the leaves and allowed to dry for a few minutes. Transparent scotch tape was applied carefully on the dried nail polish and pressed gently to have a clear impression of the stomata. The tape was carefully removed from the leaf and mounted on a microscopic slide. The prepared slides were observed under the Axioplan 2 imaging microscope (Axioplan 2 imaging; Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). To quantify stomatal opening and to statistically evaluate the stomatal response in WT and transgenic lines after drought stress, we analyzed the images taken with imaging microscope with ImageJ [97]. Briefly, the line tool was selected to measure the scale bar on each image, the scale value was then set to 200 μm. after setting the scale value, the stomata were measured at the widest point from the inside wall of one guard cell to the inside wall of the other. The mean values of eighteen stomata each were calculated and plotted for WT and transgenic lines.

Measurement of ABA content

The detailed method of Qi et al. [98] was used for the quantification of endogenous ABA. Plants samples collected under control and drought conditions were freeze-dried and grinded to obtain a fine powder, which was then extracted and chromatographed using a standard of ABA (Me-[2H6]-ABA). The fraction of sample was consequently methylated using diazomethane. Finally, ABA was detected and quantified using GCMS (6890 N network gas chromatograph). The signal ions (m/z-162 and m/z-190 for Me-ABA) and (m/z-166 and m/z-194 for Me-[2H6]-ABA) were monitored using ThermoQuset (Manchester, UK).

Statistical analyses

For all assays the experiments were repeated more than two times and the representative results presented. The data points in redox stress assay were mean of three replicates with five plants pooled in each replicate while for pathogenicity assessment and colony growth the data points were mean of five replicates. For experiments having multiple stresses, the data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) using SAS statistical program version 9.2 (Cary, Nc, United States). The rest of the data were analyzed for standard error (± SE) and student t. test to calculate p value using Microsoft Excel Program. All the graphs were prepared in Origin 9.0 software.

Availability of data and materials

All the supporting data can be found as additional file along with this manuscript. Further data analyzed during the current study is available upon reasonable request from corresponding author.

Abbreviations

ABA:

Abscisic acid

AOs:

Aldehyde oxidases

AtSABP3:

Arabidopsis salicylic acid binding protein 3

AZI:

Azelaic acid inducer

BLAST:

Basic local alignment search tool

CDF:

Cotyledon development frequency

DEGs:

Differentially expressed genes

dpd:

Days post drought

EL1:

Electrolyte leakage 1

G3PDH:

Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase

GO:

Gene ontology

GSH:

Glutathione

HR:

Hypersensitive response

MS:

Murashige and Skoog

NBS-LRR:

Nucleotide binding site-leucine rich repeats

NCED:

9-cis-epoxycrotenoid dioxygenase

NPR1:

Non-expressor of pathogenesis related gene-1

OH:

Hydroxyl radical

PMT:

Post-translational modification

qRT-PCR:

Quantitative real-time PCR

RNA-Seq:

RNA sequencing

RNIs:

Reactive nitrogen intermediates

ROIs:

Reactive oxygen intermediates

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

SA::

Hormone salicylic acid

SAR:

Systemic acquired resistance

TAIR:

The Arabidopsis Information Resource

TFs:

Transcription factors

References

  1. Culotta E, Koshland DE. No news is good-news. Sci. 1992;258(5090):1862–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Durner J, Klessig DF. Nitric oxide as a signal in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1999;2(5):369–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bright J, Desikan R, Hancock JT, Weir IS, Neill SJ. ABA-induced NO generation and stomatal closure in Arabidopsis are dependent on H2O2 synthesis. Plant J. 2006;45(1):113–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nathan C. Specificity of a third kind: reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates in cell signaling. J Clin Investig. 2003;111(6):769–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Uehara T, Nakamura T, Yao DD, Shi ZQ, Gu ZZ, Ma YL, et al. S-Nitrosylated protein-disulphide isomerase links protein misfolding to neurodegeneration. Nat. 2006;441(7092):513–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Latson L. No News is Good News, But ... Catheter. Cardio Inte. 2011;78(4):583.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jaffrey SR, Erdjument-Bromage H, Ferris CD, Tempst P, Snyder SH. Protein S-nitrosylation: a physiological signal for neuronal nitric oxide. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3(2):193–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stamler JS, Simon DI, Osborne JA, Mullins ME, Jaraki O, Michel T, et al. S-nitrosylation of proteins with nitric oxide: synthesis and characterization of biologically active compounds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89(1):444–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lindermayr C, Saalbach G, Durner J. Proteomic identification of S-Nitrosylated proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2005;137(3):921–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang Y-Q, Feechan A, Yun B-W, Shafiei R, Hofmann A, Taylor P, et al. S-Nitrosylation of AtSABP3 antagonizes the expression of plant immunity. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(4):2131–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tada Y, Spoel SH, Pajerowska-Mukhtar K, Mou Z, Song J, Wang C, Zuo J, Dong X. Plant Immunity Requires Conformational Charges of NPR1 via S-Nitrosylation and Thioredoxins. Sci (New York, NY). 2008;321(5891). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1156970.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Terrile MC, Paris R, LIA C-V, Iglesias MJ, Lamattina L, Estelle M, et al. Nitric oxide influences auxin signaling through S-nitrosylation of the Arabidopsis TRANSPORT INHIBITOR RESPONSE 1 auxin receptor. Plant J. 2012;70(3):492–500.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Romero-Puertas MC, Rodriguez-Serrano M, Sandalio LM. Protein S-nitrosylation in plants under abiotic stress: an overview. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4.

  14. Feechan A, Kwon E, Yun B-W, Wang Y, Pallas JA, Loake GJ. A central role for S-nitrosothiols in plant disease resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2005;102(22):8054–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Chaves MM, Flexas J, Pinheiro C. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann Bot-London. 2009;103(4):551–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bechtold U. Plant life in extreme environments: how do you improve drought tolerance? Front Plant Sci. 2018;9.

  17. Feller U. Drought stress and carbon assimilation in a warming climate: reversible and irreversible impacts. J Plant Physiol. 2016;203:69–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kolbert Z, Bartha B, Erdei L. Generation of nitric oxide in roots of Pisum sativum, Triticum aestivum and Petroselinum crispum plants under osmotic and drought stress. Acta Biologica Szegediensis. 2005;49(1–2):13–6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Santisree P, Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Sharma KK. NO to drought-multifunctional role of nitric oxide in plant drought: do we have all the answers? Plant Sci. 2015;239:44–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Filippou P, Bouchagier P, Skotti E, Fotopoulos V. Proline and reactive oxygen/nitrogen species metabolism is involved in the tolerant response of the invasive plant species Ailanthus altissima to drought and salinity. Environ Exp Bot. 2014;97:1–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shi HT, Ye TT, Zhu JK, Chan ZL. Constitutive production of nitric oxide leads to enhanced drought stress resistance and extensive transcriptional reprogramming in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 2014;65(15):4119–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gayatri G, Agurla S, Raghavendra AS. Nitric oxide in guard cells as an important secondary messenger during stomatal closure. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4.

  23. Besson-Bard A, Astier J, Rasul S, Wawer I, Dubreuil-Maurizi C, Jeandroz S, et al. Current view of nitric oxide-responsive genes in plants. Plant Sci. 2009;177(4):302–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Palmieri MC, Sell S, Huang X, Scherf M, Werner T, Durner J, et al. Nitric oxide-responsive genes and promoters in Arabidopsis thaliana: a bioinformatics approach. J Exp Bot. 2008;59(2):177–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hussain A, Mun BG, Imran QM, Lee SU, Adamu TA, Shahid M, et al. Nitric oxide mediated transcriptome profiling reveals activation of multiple regulatory pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7.

  26. Imran QM, Hussain A, Lee S-U, Mun B-G, Falak N, Loake GJ, et al. Transcriptome profile of NO-induced Arabidopsis transcription factor genes suggests their putative regulatory role in multiple biological processes. Sci Rep-Uk. 2018;8(1):771.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Takasaki H, Maruyama K, Takahashi F, Fujita M, Yoshida T, Nakashima K, et al. SNAC-as, stress-responsive NAC transcription factors, mediate ABA-inducible leaf senescence. Plant J. 2015;84(6):1114–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hicke JA, Zeppel MJB. Climate-driven tree mortality: insights from the pinon pine die-off in the United States. New Phytol. 2013;200(2):301–3.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schwartz SH, Tan BC, Gage DA, JAD Z, DR MC. Specific oxidative cleavage of carotenoids by VP14 of maize. Sci. 1997;276(5320):1872–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tan BC, Schwartz SH, Zeevaart JAD, McCarty DR. Genetic control of abscisic acid biosynthesis in maize. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94(22):12235–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sekimoto H, Seo M, Kawakami N, Komano T, Desloire S, Liotenberg S, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of aldehyde oxidases in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 1998;39(4):433–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Seo M, Peeters AJ, Koiwai H, Oritani T, Marion-Poll A, Zeevaart JA, et al. The Arabidopsis aldehyde oxidase 3 (AAO3) gene product catalyzes the final step in abscisic acid biosynthesis in leaves. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2000;97(23):12908–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Garcia-Mata C, Lamattina L. Nitric oxide and abscisic acid cross talk in guard cells. Plant Physiol. 2002;128(3):790–2.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhao CC, Cai SG, Wang YZ, Chen ZH. Loss of nitrate reductases NIA1 and NIA2 impairs stomatal closure by altering genes of core ABA signaling components in Arabidopsis. Plant Signal Behav. 2016;11(6):e1183088.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Cao FY, Yoshioka K, Desveaux D. The roles of ABA in plant-pathogen interactions. J Plant Res. 2011;124(4):489–99.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Seo M, Koiwai H, Akaba S, Komano T, Oritani T, Kamiya Y, et al. Abscisic aldehyde oxidase in leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2000;23(4):481–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hu YQ, Liu S, Yuan HM, Li J, Yan DW, Zhang JAF, et al. Functional comparison of catalase genes in the elimination of photorespiratory H2O2 using promoter- and 3′-untranslated region exchange experiments in the Arabidopsis cat2 photorespiratory mutant. Plant Cell Environ. 2010;33(10):1656–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yun BW, Skelly MJ, Yin M, Yu M, Mun BG, Lee SU, Hussain A, Spoel SH, Loake GJ: Nitric oxide and S-nitrosoglutathione function additively during plant immunity. New Phytol 2016, 211(2):516-526.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Foster MW, Liu LM, Zeng M, Hess DT, Stamler JS. A genetic analysis of Nitrosative stress. Biochem. 2009;48(4):792–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Glazebrook J. Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2005;43:205–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Jones JDG, Dangl JL. The plant immune system. Nat. 2006;444(7117):323–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Alvarez ME, Pennell RI, Meijer PJ, Ishikawa A, Dixon RA, Lamb C. Reactive oxygen intermediates mediate a systemic signal network in the establishment of plant immunity. Cell. 1998;92(6):773–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Song FM, Goodman RM. Activity of nitric oxide is dependent on, but is partially required for function of, salicylic acid in the signaling pathway in tobacco systemic acquired resistance. Mol Plant Microbe In. 2001;14(12):1458–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang PC, Dua YY, Hou YJ, Zhao Y, Hsu CC, Yuan FJ, et al. Nitric oxide negatively regulates abscisic acid signaling in guard cells by S-nitrosylation of OST1. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(2):613–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lim CW, Baek W, Jung J, Kim JH, Lee SC. Function of ABA in stomatal defense against biotic and drought stresses. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(7):15251–70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. del Rio LA. ROS and RNS in plant physiology: an overview. J Exp Bot. 2015;66(10):2827–37.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Delledonne M, Xia Y, Dixon RA, Lamb C. Nitric oxide functions as a signal in plant disease resistance. Nat. 1998;394(6693):585–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Yun B-W, Feechan A, Yin M, Saidi NBB, Le Bihan T, Yu M, et al. S-nitrosylation of NADPH oxidase regulates cell death in plant immunity. Nat. 2011:264–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhao L, Zhang F, Guo J, Yang Y, Li B, Zhang L. Nitric oxide functions as a signal in salt resistance in the calluses from two ecotypes of reed. Plant Physiol. 2004;134(2):849–57.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Parani M, Rudrabhatla S, Myers R, Weirich H, Smith B, Leaman DW, et al. Microarray analysis of nitric oxide responsive transcripts in Arabidopsis. Plant Biotechnol J. 2004;2(4):359–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Begara-Morales JC, Sánchez-Calvo B, Luque F, Leyva-Pérez MO, Leterrier M, Corpas FJ, Barroso JB. Differential transcriptomic analysis by RNA-Seq of GSNO-responsive genes between Arabidopsis roots and leaves. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014:pcu044.

  52. Huang X, von Rad U, Durner J. Nitric oxide induces transcriptional activation of the nitric oxide-tolerant alternative oxidase in Arabidopsis suspension cells. Planta. 2002;215(6):914–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ahlfors R, Brosche M, Kollist H, Kangasjarvi J. Nitric oxide modulates ozone-induced cell death, hormone biosynthesis and gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2009;58(1):1–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Lindermayr C. Crosstalk between reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide in plants: key role of S-nitrosoglutathione reductase. Free Radic Bio Med. 2017.

  55. Nestler E, Greengard P. Protein phosphorylation is of fundamental importance in biological regulation. Basic Neurochem Mol Cell Med Aspects. 1999;6.

  56. Millar TM, Stevens CR, Benjamin N, Eisenthal R, Harrison R, Blake DR. Xanthine oxidoreductase catalyses the reduction of nitrates and nitrite to nitric oxide under hypoxic conditions. FEBS Lett. 1998;427(2):225–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Kim JS, Mizoi J, Yoshida T, Fujita Y, Nakajima J, Ohori T, et al. An ABRE promoter sequence is involved in osmotic stress-responsive expression of the DREB2A gene, which encodes a transcription factor regulating drought-inducible genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011;52(12):2136–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Fukuda Y. Interaction of tobacco nuclear protein with an elicitor-responsive element in the promoter of a basic class I chitinase gene. Plant Mol Biol. 1997;34(1):81–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Ohme-Takagi M, Shinshi H. Ethylene-inducible DNA binding proteins that interact with an ethylene-responsive element. Plant Cell. 1995;7(2):173–82.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Singh D, Laxmi A. Transcriptional regulation of drought response: a tortuous network of transcriptional factors. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6.

  61. Imran QM, Hussain A, Mun BG, Lee SU, Asaf S, Ali MA, et al. Transcriptome wide identification and characterization of NO-responsive WRKY transcription factors in Arabidopsis thaliana L. Environ Exp Bot. 2018;148:128–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Uchida A, Jagendorf AT, Hibino T, Takabe T, Takabe T. Effects of hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide on both salt and heat stress tolerance in rice. Plant Sci. 2002;163(3):515–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Vanderauwera S, Zimmermann P, Rombauts S, Vandenabeele S, Langebartels C, Gruissem W, et al. Genome-wide analysis of hydrogen peroxide-regulated gene expression in Arabidopsis reveals a high light-induced transcriptional cluster involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2005;139(2):806–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Kopyra M, Gwozdz EA. The role of nitric oxide in plant growth regulation and responses to abiotic stresses. Acta Physiol Plant. 2004;26(4):459–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Beligni MV, Lamattina L. Nitric oxide stimulates seed germination and de-etiolation, and inhibits hypocotyl elongation, three light-inducible responses in plants. Planta. 2000;210(2):215–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Giba Z, Grubisic D, Todorovic S, Sajc L, Stojakovic D, Konjevic R. Effect of nitric oxide - releasing compounds on phytochrome - controlled germination of empress tree seeds. Plant Growth Regul. 1998;26(3):175–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. He WL, Frost MC. Direct measurement of actual levels of nitric oxide (NO) in cell culture conditions using soluble NO donors. Redox Biol. 2016;9:1–14.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Glazebrook J, Rogers EE, Ausubel FM. Isolation of Arabidopsis mutants with enhanced disease susceptibility by direct screening. Genetics. 1996;143(2):973–82.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Parker JE, Holub EB, Frost LN, Falk A, Gunn ND, Daniels MJ. Characterization of eds1, a mutation in Arabidopsis suppressing resistance to Peronospora parasitica specified by several different RPP genes. Plant Cell. 1996;8(11):2033–46.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Van Wees SC, Glazebrook J. Loss of non-host resistance of Arabidopsis NahG to pseudomonas syringae pv. Phaseolicola is due to degradation products of salicylic acid. Plant J. 2003;33(4):733–42.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Hammond-Kosack KE, Jones JD. Resistance gene-dependent plant defense responses. Plant Cell. 1996;8(10):1773–91.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Tsuda K, Sato M, Glazebrook J, Cohen JD, Katagiri F. Interplay between MAMP-triggered and SA-mediated defense responses (vol 53, pg 763, 2008). Plant J. 2008;55(6):1061.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Vishwakarma K, Upadhyay N, Kumar N, Yadav G, Singh J, Mishra RK, et al. Abscisic acid signaling and abiotic stress tolerance in plants: a review on current knowledge and future prospects. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8.

  74. Christmann A, Weiler EW, Steudle E, Grill E. A hydraulic signal in root-to-shoot signalling of water shortage. Plant J. 2007;52(1):167–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Finkelstein RR, Gampala SSL, Rock CD. Abscisic acid signaling in seeds and seedlings. Plant Cell. 2002;14:S15–45.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Frey A, Effroy D, Lefebvre V, Seo M, Perreau F, Berger A, et al. Epoxycarotenoid cleavage by NCED5 fine-tunes ABA accumulation and affects seed dormancy and drought tolerance with other NCED family members. Plant J. 2012;70(3):501–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Chak RKF, Thomas TL, Quatrano RS, Rock CD. The genes ABI1 and ABI2 are involved in abscisic acid- and drought-inducible expression of the Daucus carota L. Dc3 promoter in guard cells of transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Planta. 2000;210(6):875–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Koussevitzky S, Suzuki N, Huntington S, Armijo L, Sha W, Cortes D, et al. Ascorbate peroxidase 1 plays a key role in the response of Arabidopsis thaliana to stress combination. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(49):34197–203.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Sakuma Y, Maruyama K, Osakabe Y, Qin F, Seki M, Shinozaki K, et al. Functional analysis of an Arabidopsis transcription factor, DREB2A, involved in drought-responsive gene expression. Plant Cell. 2006;18(5):1292–309.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Radi R. Nitric oxide, oxidants, and protein tyrosine nitration. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(12):4003–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Hu JL, Yang HJ, Mu JY, Lu TC, Peng JL, Deng X, Kong ZS, Bao SL, Cao XF, Zuo JR. Nitric Oxide Regulates Protein Methylation during Stress Responses in Plants. Mol Cell. 2017;67(4):702.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Patel RK, Jain M. NGS QC Toolkit: A toolkit for quality control of next generation sequencing data. PLoS One. 2012:7(2).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Trapnell C, Pachter L, Salzberg SL. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinform. 2009;25(9):1105–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Flicek P, Amode MR, Barrell D, Beal K, Billis K, Brent S, et al. Ensembl 2014. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(D1):D749–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren MJ, et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(5):511–U174.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Shirsat A, Wilford N, Croy R, Boulter D. Sequences responsible for the tissue specific promoter activity of a pea legumin gene in tobacco. Mol Gen Genet. 1989;215(2):326–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Clarke A, Desikan R, Hurst RD, Hancock JT, Neill SJ. NO way back: nitric oxide and programmed cell death in Arabidopsis thaliana suspension cultures. Plant J. 2000;24(5):667–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Fourcroy P, Vansuyt G, Kushnir S, Inze D, Briat JF. Iron-regulated expression of a cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase encoded by the APX1 gene in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Physiol. 2004;134(2):605–13.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Kim Y, Park S, Gilmour SJ, Thomashow MF. Roles of CAMTA transcription factors and salicylic acid in configuring the low-temperature transcriptome and freezing tolerance of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2013;75(3):364–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Endo A, Sawada Y, Takahashi H, Okamoto M, Ikegami K, Koiwai H, et al. Drought induction of Arabidopsis 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase occurs in vascular parenchyma cells. Plant Physiol. 2008;147(4):1984–93.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Imran QM, Falak N, Hussain A, Mun B-G, Sharma A, Lee S-U, et al. Nitric oxide responsive heavy metal-associated gene AtHMAD1 contributes to development and disease resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7.

  92. Koch E, Slusarenko A. Arabidopsis is susceptible to infection by a downy mildew fungus. Plant Cell. 1990;2(5):437–45.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72(1–2):248–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Jiang YJ, Liang G, Yu DQ. Activated expression of WRKY57 confers drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant. 2012;5(6):1375–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Masoumi A, Kafi M, Khazaei H, Davari K. Effect of drought stress on water status, elecrolyte leakage and enzymatic antioxidants of kochia (Kochia scoparia) under saline condition. Pak J Bot. 2010;42(5):3517–24.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Shahzad R, Waqas M, Khan AL, Hamayun M, Kang SM, Lee IJ. Foliar application of methyl jasmonate induced physio-hormonal changes in Pisum sativum under diverse temperature regimes. Plant Physiol Bioch. 2015;96:406–16.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):671–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Qi QG, Rose PA, Abrams GD, Taylor DC, Abrams SR. Cutler AJ: (+)-abscisic acid metabolism, 3-ketoacyl-coenzyme a synthase gene expression, and very-long-chain monounsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis in Brassica napus embryos. Plant Physiol. 1998;117(3):979–87.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Arabidopsis biological resource center for providing seeds and to Mr. Adamu Tefere Alem and Rolly Nukulu Kabange for guidance during experiments.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (SSAC, Grant No., PJ01342501), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea. Furthermore, the funding body have no role in designing of study, collection and interpretation of data or writing up the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Murtaza Khan, Qari Muhammad Imran and Muhammad Shahid contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Plant Functional Genomics Department of Plant Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea

    Bong-Gyu Mun, Sang-Uk Lee & Byung-Wook Yun

  2. Laboratory of Plant Physiology, Department of Plant Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea

    Muhammad Aaqil Khan & In-Jung Lee

  3. Department of Agriculture, Abdul Wali Khan University, KPK, Mardan, Pakistan

    Adil Hussain

Authors
  1. Murtaza Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qari Muhammad Imran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Muhammad Shahid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bong-Gyu Mun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sang-Uk Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Muhammad Aaqil Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Adil Hussain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. In-Jung Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Byung-Wook Yun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

QMI and B-WY designed the study; MK, QMI, and MS performed the experiments; MK, QMI, AHU and BGM analyzed the data; MK, QMI, MS and SL measured SNO levels, MAK, measured ABA levels, QMI, and AHU drafted the manuscript; IL and B-WY supervised and critically reviewed the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byung-Wook Yun.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All the plant material used in this study were ordered from Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center. The experiments carried out complies with national and international guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

List of ABA metabolism-related genes that showed response to 1 mM CySNO in the RNA-seq-based transcriptome.

Additional file 2

Transcript accumulation of PR2 gene after attempted Pst DC3000 inoculation.

Additional file 3.

Quantification of stomatal opening under control and Drought stress condition.

Additional file 4.

List of genes analyzed using qPCR and their primer sequences.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, M., Imran, Q.M., Shahid, M. et al. Nitric oxide- induced AtAO3 differentially regulates plant defense and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol 19, 602 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-2210-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-2210-3

Keywords

  • RNA-seq analysis
  • Nitrosative stress
  • ABA metabolism genes
  • Basal defense
  • R-gene-mediated resistance
  • Drought stress
  • Stomatal regulation

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us