Skip to main content

Scion control of miRNA abundance and tree maturity in grafted avocado

Abstract

Background

Grafting is the common propagation method for avocado and primarily benefits orchard production by reducing the time to tree productivity. It also allows use of scions and rootstocks specifically selected for improved productivity and commercial acceptance. Rootstocks in avocado may be propagated from mature tree cuttings (‘mature’), or from seed (‘juvenile’). While the use of mature scion material hastens early bearing/maturity and economic return, the molecular factors involved in the role of the scion and/or rootstock in early bearing/reduced juvenility of the grafted tree are still unknown.

Results

Here, we utilized juvenility and flowering associated miRNAs; miR156 and miR172 and their putative target genes to screen pre-graft and post-graft material in different combinations from avocado. The abundance of mature miR156, miR172 and the miR156 target gene SPL4, showed a strong correlation to the maturity of the scion and rootstock material in avocado. Graft transmissibility of miR156 and miR172 has been explored in annual plants. Here, we show that the scion may be responsible for grafted tree maturity involving these factors, while the rootstock maturity does not significantly influence miRNA abundance in the scion. We also demonstrate that the presence of leaves on cutting rootstocks supports graft success and contributes towards intergraft signalling involving the carbohydrate-marker TPS1.

Conclusion

Here, we suggest that the scion largely controls the molecular ‘maturity’ of grafted avocado trees, however, leaves on the rootstock not only promote graft success, but can influence miRNA and mRNA abundance in the scion. This constitutes the first study on scion and rootstock contribution towards grafted tree maturity using the miR156-SPL4-miR172 regulatory module as a marker for juvenility and reproductive competence.

Background

Grafting is an ancient technique widely used for crop improvement in agriculture. It is a process in which two compatible plants are combined using a bud or branch from one plant (scion) and the roots of another plant (rootstock). In fruit trees like avocado, grafting provides a dual plant system to increase orchard productivity. Usually, scions with high yield and quality are grafted onto rootstocks with improved stress/disease tolerance. In this dual plant system, rootstocks are also selected to increase orchard efficiency through vigour control and yield improvement of the scion. Increasing precocity is another benefit of grafting, as scions taken from mature trees show significantly earlier bearing and maturity relative to trees grown from seed. Many tree crops with long juvenile phases are grown as grafted plants to obtain faster return on investment.

Grafting success requires sufficient healing of the union to allow biomolecular signalling and nutrient transportation between root and shoot, an essential system to maintain growth and survival of both organs. This includes transportation of photosynthates (carbon), ions, water, nutrients, hormones and proteins/amino acids within the phloem and xylem vasculatures. Signalling in the xylem is unidirectional from root to shoot, however, bi-directional signalling can be carried out by phloem, which comprises specialized vascular bundles connected through plasmodesmata (pores). More recently, these pores have been shown to facilitate long-distance signalling of regulatory molecules including protein/RNA [1].

Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana heterografts have revealed that over one hundred mRNA transcripts may move across the graft union [2]. This movement of mRNAs can occur both from shoot to root as well as from root to shoot [3]. This phenomenon was also observed in grapevine, which is a perennial plant [4]. In addition to mRNA transcripts, grafting experiments also revealed mobility of small RNA (smRNAs) molecules via phloem to reach specific tissues [5]. Of these smRNAs, microRNAs (miRNAs) were documented to be involved in scion/rootstock signalling in regulating biotic and abiotic factors such as drought stress and tuberization [6,7,8,9].

miRNAs are 20–24 nucleotide (nt) long, non-coding RNA molecules that negatively regulate gene activity by targeting specific gene transcripts for degradation. Interestingly, key plant miRNAs that are known to be involved in the juvenile-adult phase transition, miR156 and miR172, are shown to be graft transmissible in potato [9, 10]. Sequential activity of miR156 and miR172 mediates the juvenile-to-adult transition in perennials as well as in annuals by downregulating members of the SQUAMOSA promoter binding protein-like (SPL) and APETALA2-like transcription factor gene families, respectively [11,12,13,14,15,16]. Overexpression of miR156 results in delays in flowering while miR172 overexpression results in the opposite phenotype. In juvenile plants miR156 is highly abundant, which indirectly suppresses miR172, while mature trees have low miR156 levels and high miR172 levels. We have previously shown that this model holds true for both miR156 and miR172 abundance in avocado [17].

It has been suggested that a mobile signal(s) orginating from leaves regulates plant phase change, involving repression of miR156 [18]. Defoliation experiments in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana resulted in a prolonged juvenile phase with an increased level of miR156. Sugar signals can be thought of as a potential candidate for this mobile regulation [19, 20]. Recently, it has been suggested that trehalose-6-phosphate (T6P) regulates flowering in the shoot apical meristem and in the leaves [21]. Further, Trehalose-6-Phosphate Synthase 1 (TPS1), a key enzyme in the T6P pathway which regulates carbohydrate availability, functions upstream of florigen FT in the age-dependent flowering pathway in leaves [22].

Avocado rootstocks for grafting can be derived via seeds or via clonal propagation by rooting cuttings taken from mature trees. In the case of clonal rootstocks, this material is presumed physiologically mature as it derived from a mature tree cutting and subjected to rooting induction. Meanwhile, seedlings are physiologically juvenile.

As grafting on seedling or clonal rootstocks is widely used in avocado for commercial propagation, we questioned if the presumed difference in physiological maturity of these rootstocks is reflected in the abundance of these miRNAs. Given the proposed graft-transmissibility of miR156 and miR172 in other species, we also questioned if the rootstock origin could influence miRNA levels and their target genes in the scion post-grafting. In avocado, grafted trees usually start flowering the next season after planting if conditions are favourable, regardless of rootstock. This observation suggests that the scion maturity determines the maturity level of the grafted plant. However, it has also been suggested that clonal avocado rootstocks may promote earlier flowering and fruiting than seedling rootstocks as they are derived from mature tissues, but this has not been formally examined [23]. In this study, we hypothesized that the adult trait signals in the mature scion overcomes any potential juvenility factors associated with seedling rootstocks and the resultant grafted plants behave like a plant in reproductive phase. We show significant differences in abundances of miR156 and miR172 between seedling and cutting rootstocks, but this had limited impact on the miRNAs and target gene abundance in the mature budwood scion. Instead, we reveal that the scion is mainly responsible for mature miR156 and miR172 abundance in this woody tree crop, and the maturity of the scion thus reflects the abundance of these miRNAs locally. We do, however, show evidence for some long-distance signalling that may involve leaves below the graft union, regulating the carbohydrate maker gene TPS1 and these miRNAs.

Results

In order to quantify the abundance of phase-change associated miRNAs (miR156 and miR172) in seedling versus clonal rootstocks and detect any possible root-to-shoot signalling in avocado, grafting experiments were designed. Scions comprising either the primary growing shoot of young seedlings or budwood from mature age trees (mature scionwood) were grafted onto both seedling and cutting (clonal) rootstocks to determine the relative influence of scion vs rootstock maturity on mature microRNA and gene expression in grafted avocado scions.

Assessment of pre-graft maturity

We have previously shown that in avocado, similar to additional species [15, 16, 24], high miR156 and low miR172 abundance in leaves is significantly associated with juvenility of the plant [17]. Thus, to predict the maturity/phase of the pre-grafting material, rootstock and scion leaf samples were analysed for miR156 and miR172 abundance. Consistent with their more juvenile state, seedling rootstocks had a significantly higher level of miR156 relative to clonal rootstocks (Fig. 1a), while miR172 showed the inverse expression pattern (Fig. 1b). Moreover, the expression of both these miRNAs in the clonal rootstocks perfectly mirrored that of the mature ‘Hass’ scion material taken directly from field trees (Fig. 1a, b). This suggests that clonal rootstocks of avocado retain the molecular maturity of their parent trees, despite undergoing the clonal rootstock production process.

Fig. 1
figure1

Transcript abundance of miRNAs and their putative target genes in pre-graft avocado material. Expression analysis (qRT-PCR) of a miR156, b miR172, c PaSPL4 and d PaRAP2.7B in pre-graft avocado leaves sampled from the seedling rootstock, clonal rootstock, seedling scion and budwood scion. Error bars represent standard error of the mean (n = 3), and significant differences are shown in different letters (p < 0.05)

To further explore this hypothesis, the expression of the miR156 and miR172 putative target genes were profiled. The abundance level of the predicted miR156 target, PaSPL4, was inversely correlated to miR156 and was highest in clonal rootstocks and budwood scions along with miR172 (Fig. 1a, c). SPL4 is known to promote the transition to reproductive maturation in plants at least in part through activation of various floral identity genes [25,26,27]. miR172 acts antagonistically to miR156 and is considered a positive regulator of flowering by repressing AP2 like floral repressor genes [24, 28,29,30]. Transcript abundance of the AP2 homolog, PaRAP2.7B, was inversely correlated with miR172 and highly expressed in the seedling rootstocks and scions relative to clonal rootstocks and budwood scions (Fig. 1b, d), consistent with its putative action as a floral repressor [13, 29, 31]. Taken together, the expression data of markers for juvenility and flowering suggest that seedling rootstocks and scions of avocado are in juvenile phase and clonal rootstocks and budwood are in adult or reproductive phase.

Post-grafting: graft signalling and maturity in avocado

To determine any possible effect of rootstock maturity and miRNA expression on the post-grafting scion, the youngest fully expanded leaves from the scion of the grafted plants were sampled 3 months and 6 months post-grafting, and then profiled for mature miR156 (Fig. 2a), miR172 (Fig. 2b), and their putative target genes (Fig. 2c, d). In 3 months post-grafted trees, miR156 abundance appeared to be governed by the scion (Fig. 2a). Budwood scions, which exhibit flowering during next flowering season, retained their low miR156 abundance, while the seedling scions (no flowering phenotype) showed high miR156 expression. This trend remained similar for 6 months samples, however in this case the results were confounded by lack of significance between samples – although miR156 in seedling scions was reduced to budwood levels when grafted to clonal rootstocks, this reduction was not significant compared to seedling/seedling grafts.

Fig. 2
figure2

Expression profile of miRNAs and their putative target genes in avocado post-graft material. Expression analysis (qRT-PCR) of a miR156, b miR172, c PaSPL4 and d PaRAP2.7B in post-grafting avocado leaves, ‘Hass’ as scion and ‘Velvick’ as rootstock. Where, S/S = seedling scion on seedling rootstock, B/S = budwood scion on seedling rootstock, S/C = seedling scion on clonal rootstock and B/C = budwood scion on clonal rootstock. Error bars represent standard error of the mean (n = 3), and significant differences are shown in different letters for 3 month and 6 months post-grafting calculated using one way ANOVA for each time-point, respectively. (p < 0.05)

We then profiled PaSPL4 to see if miR156 expression pattern can be translated into the target effect. Here, again the results suggest that the scion is primarily governing PaSPL4 transcript abundance, as with miR156 (Fig. 2c). PaSPL4 transcript abundance at 3 months post-grafting showed a strong negative correlation with miR156 abundance, where high transcript abundance was observed in budwood scions and vice versa in seedling scions (Fig. 2c). However, unlike for miR156, at 6 months post-grafting, PaSPL4 expression was significantly scion dependent. This suggests a possibility of local regulation of PaSPL4 independent of direct miR156 dependent age pathway.

Interestingly, there was a difference in miR172 expression between budwood scions grafted to seedling vs. clonal rootstocks at 3 months post-grafting. The budwood grafted onto the seedling rootstocks had similarly low miR172 expression pattern as seedling scions grafted on both seedling and clonal rootstocks. On the other hand, budwood grafted on clonal rootstocks had significantly higher abundance of miR172 (p < 0.05). This observed lower expression of miR172 using seedling rootstock suggests that rootstock may also have a role in determining grafted plant miR172 levels and potentially fate (Fig. 2b). However, this effect was absent 6 months post-grafting, where budwood grafted on seedling and clonal rootstocks both had similar expression patterns (Fig. 2b). In general, the expression pattern of PaRAP2.7B anticorrelated with the level of miR172 and was affected by rootstock type (Fig. 2d).

We also profiled the additional putative miR156 target genes, PaSPL9a, PaSPL9b, which are putative homologues of SPL9 (avocado has two copies of SPL9), as well as PaAP2 and PaRAP2.7A, which are putative miR172 targets. However, no clear pattern was observed for these transcripts depending on maturity of grafting material (Additional file 1: Figure S1 and S2), which is consistent with our previous finding suggesting these transcripts may not be involved in the maturity pathway in the leaves [17]. This observation may suggest a lack of miR156-SPL9 and miR172-AP2-Like transcriptional regulatory module in grafted avocado leaves. These observations are based on mRNA transcript abundance and do not rule out a possibility of translational/posttranslational regulation of SPL9 and AP2-like proteins by miR156 and miR172, respectively. Another possibly of this disconnect can be the regulation of these genes independent of their respective miRNAs regulatory module.

Graft success, height of the tree and flowering data were collected for grafted plants. Greater than 80% graft success was observed for mature budwood scions grafted onto seedling as well as clonal rootstocks (commercial industry practice). Lower grafting success was observed when using seedling scions (Additional file 1: Table S1). Trees produced using clonal rootstocks were taller than those on seedling rootstocks (Mean height (cm) value with Standard Deviation (SD): budwood scion/ seedling rootstock = 46.5 cm ± 4.7, seedling scion/seedling rootstock = 43.5 cm ± 7.8, budwood scion/clonal rootstock = 92.8 cm ± 6.6 and seedling scion/clonal rootstock = 88.6 cm ± 9.6) (Additional file 1: Table S2). Flowering data correlated to the miRNA/target gene expression patterns in terms of maturity, where the budwood scions flowered the very next season from the time of grafting. On the other hand, seedling scions did not produce flowers on both rootstocks (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Leaves as a potential source of signalling across the graft junction

Commercially, to achieve higher graft success, the leaves on clonal rootstocks are generally not removed during grafting as they are presumed to provide a source of energy for graft healing. Meanwhile, seedling rootstocks are devoid of leaves because the growing shoot tip with leaves is removed, and presumably graft healing is promoted by energy remaining from the seed. As the presence of leaves is a major difference between clonal and seedling rootstocks, we hypothesized that the leaves may contribute not only to graft health, but to intergraft signalling. Thus, to check whether leaves have any effect on the apparent inter-graft signalling noted for miR172 in clonal grafts we designed an independent experiment where ‘Hass’ budwood was grafted onto ‘Velvick’ clonal rootstocks in two groups; one group with leaves left on the rootstock (with leaves ‘WL’ grafts), the other group where leaves were removed from the rootstock (without leaves ‘WOL’ grafts). We then profiled miR156 and miR172 in the scions of both graft combinations 3 months post-grafting. We also profiled the abundance of PaTPS1, which has been shown to indicate carbohydrate availability in plants [22], as marker for possible rootstock-derived carbohydrates moving to the scion.

Consistent with industry know-how, the graft success rate was more than 80% for the grafts with leaves while it was less than 30% when leaves were removed from the clonal rootstock prior to grafting (Additional file 1: Table S1). Moreover, consistent with our hypothesis that the leaves contributed to the higher miR172 level in B/C grafts relative to B/S grafts above, significantly higher miR172 abundance was observed in scions sampled from grafts with leaves, as compared to the grafts where leaves were removed (Fig. 3a). Opposite trends were observed for miR156 abundance, which was significantly higher in grafts where leaves were removed from rootstocks (Fig. 3b). Similarly, to miR172, PaTPS1 abundance in the scion was higher in the grafts where the rootstock leaves were not removed (Fig. 3c, d). This suggests a possible role for leaves in inter-graft signalling of miR156, miR172 in avocado, and which may involve mobile sugars.

Fig. 3
figure3

miR156/miR172/PaTPS1 transcript abundance corresponds to the presence/absence of leaves in the rootstock. Expression analysis (qRT-PCR) to compare effect of leaves on grafted tree molecular profiles of a miR172, b miR156 and c PaTPS1 in post-grafting avocado leaves, ‘Hass’ budwood scion and ‘Velvick’ as clonal rootstock in two group; with leaves and without leaves, d PaTPS1 expression in 3-month post-grafting comparison in budwood on seedling and budwood on clonal. Error bars represent standard error of the mean (n = 3), different letter show significant difference (p < 0.05)

Discussion

Grafting is widely used as the preferred method of propagation in horticultural trees, which combines a desirable scion with a suitable rootstock cultivar to improve productivity outcomes. In avocado, scion material comprises budwood collected from mature trees of a fruiting cultivar, while rootstocks may either be derived from seed or from mature tree cuttings. Although more difficult to produce, the use of rooted cuttings provides genetic uniformity of the rootstock for these outcrossing species.

Field observation has shown that a major benefit of grafting is the reduction of the juvenile phase in the grafted tree, leading to earlier productivity. However, the molecular players involved, and relative impact of grafting material maturity on the grafted tree maturity remains unknown. We have previously shown that the phase transition related miRNAs miR156, miR172, and the miR156 target gene SPL4, can be reliably used as markers to differentiate between juvenile and adult trees/material in avocado [17]. Graft transmissible signalling of miR156 and miR172 has been reported in potato [9, 10]. This makes these miRNAs ideal candidates to explore whether rootstocks derived from seedlings or mature cuttings show different molecular maturity profiles, and if this may have any influence on the scion maturity profile. Here, we employed a molecular strategy to investigate the maturity of pre-graft and post-graft avocado trees, using both seedling and cutting rootstocks.

Generally, avocado seedlings can be used as rootstocks for grafting as young as two months old. On the other hand, preparation of clonal rootstocks requires use of a specialised technique to induce root formation on the cutting/budwood taken from a mature tree. However, it is still unknown whether these clonal rootstocks maintain the same maturity level as their source tree after going through the rooting process.

Using the miR156-SPL4/miR172 model of juvenility and phase transition, here we examined the maturity level of the pre-graft materials in addition to the grafted plant at the time of typical commercial supply. Avocado seedling scions and rootstocks showed a juvenile miRNA profile compared to the budwood taken from a mature tree: seedlings showed a high abundance of miR156 while budwood material had a low abundance, and vice versa for its downstream targets PaSPL4 and miR172. This aligns with previous findings in avocado [17] and other crops [13, 15] where a similar molecular profile was associated to juvenile and adult plants. We further observed that avocado clonal rootstocks have a similar miRNA profile to the budwood material, with low miR156 and high miR172 abundance, and negative correlation to their target transcripts (PaSPL4 and PaRAP2.7A) (Fig. 1). This is consistent with the roles of these genes in other species and suggests that even though these clonal rootstock plants were subjected to an intense rooting process they retained the maturity level of their source trees.

Previously, it has been suggested that miR156 and miR172 are graft transmissible miRNAs in potato [9, 10]. The question here is whether genetically different parts of the grafted tree (scion and rootstock) can interchange molecular signals involved in juvenility. In order to profile maturity-related miRNAs of avocado trees post-grafting and detect any possible inter-graft signalling from rootstocks of different maturity, we evaluated post-graft samples for miR156 and miR172 abundance and target gene effects. Consistent with the role of miR156 in juvenility promotion in plants [12, 13, 15, 24], miR156 abundance in avocado seedling scions remained significantly greater than in budwood scions 3 months post-grafting. In addition, an anti-correlative association was observed between miR156 and its predicted target gene PaSPL4 at 3 months. By 6 months post grafting, mature miR156 abundance in seedling scions grafted on clonal rootstock plants was reduced to budwood levels, suggesting a rootstock effect. However, this reduction was not significant relative to seedling on seedling grafts, thus a clear effect of rootstock on seedling scion miR156 level could not be confirmed. Similarly, for budwood scions, neither miR156 nor PaSPL4 were affected by rootstock maturity (seedling vs clonal). Thus, despite the difference in miR156 and PaSPL4 abundance between the two rootstock types pre-grafting, there appears to be no significant transmissibility of this status to the scions. Moreover, consistent with a functioning miR156-SPL4 regulatory module in avocado, the levels of miR156 and SPL4 were generally anticorrelated, although this was less clear 6 months post-grafting where miR156 expression declined. This may suggest a possibility of SPL4 regulation independent of the miR156 dependent age regulatory pathway in avocado as was observed in Arabidopsis where SPL3/4/5 were regulated independent of miR156-dependent age pathway [22].

Commercially propagated avocado plants comprising budwood scions grafted on either seedling or clonal rootstocks are observed to acquire floral competency in very next season after field planting. However, this phenomenon has not been quantified in the literature to our best knowledge. Grafts using mature scionwood produced flowers the next flowering season after grafting. Meanwhile, grafts with seedling scions did not produce flowers regardless of rootstock. This aligns with field observation and the molecular data showing primarily scion control of juvenility associated genes discussed above.

Nonetheless, here we provide some limited evidence for inter-graft regulation of miR156 and miR172 in avocado in at least one grafting combination and timepoint. At 3 months post-grafting, the expression of miR172 in budwood scions was affected by rootstock, with levels reduced to those seen for seedling scions specifically in budwood grafted on seedling rootstocks. This may provide evidence for a possible repressor of miR172 moving from the seedling rootstock to the mature scion, or a promoter of miR172 moving from the clonal rootstock. An obvious candidate for a negative regulator would be a mobile miR156, or miR156-regulated, signal, given that miR156 is indirect negative regulator of miR172 in Arabidopsis and other plants [13, 15, 24, 32]. However, we saw no evidence for increased miR156 abundance in budwood scions grafted on seedling rootstocks at this time (Fig. 2a). Ultimately, by 6 months post-grafting, the levels of miR172 in budwood scions was equivalent between seedling and clonal grafts. This suggests that even though there may be early graft-transmissible effects, miRNA level in the scion largely depends on the scion material.

In a commercial nursery setting, the leaves are normally left on clonal rootstocks as these leaves are considered critical for graft success. Seedling rootstocks lack leaves however they are still fed from the cotyledonary energy stores, thought to help with graft take. Generally, leaves are known to be involved in multidirectional long-distance signalling in plants; towards both root and apical meristems [33,34,35]. The movement of molecular factors from leaves to the apical meristem has already been established [34]. We hypothesized that the presence of leaves specifically on clonal rootstocks could be a differentiating factor, unrelated to maturity, affecting rootstock-dependent gene expression in the scion. Here we reveal that removing leaves from clonal rootstocks does influence miR156 and miR172 abundance in the scion (Fig. 4). Leaves are the powerhouse of the plants and the main source of energy/photosynthate production. To further investigate whether the carbohydrate availability of the plant may contribute in this scenario we profiled the carbohydrate availability marker TPS1 (a key enzyme in T6P pathway) which is known to interact with age-dependent flowering pathway upstream of miR156 [21]. We show that PaTPS1 transcript abundance in the scion leaves decreased in grafts where leaves were removed from the rootstock (Fig. 4b). This suggests that leaves below the graft union contribute to sugar signalling in the scion in these species. In this way, removing leaves likely impacts the carbohydrate availability to the plants supporting the commercial industry practice to retain leaves to increase graft success. This is further evident from our observation that graft success in our hands was less than 30% in grafts where leaves were removed from rootstocks.

Fig. 4
figure4

Proposed inter-graft signalling in 3 month-post grafted avocado trees - leaves on the rootstock contribute to graft-signalling. Intact leaves in the rootstock affect transcript abundance in the scion: a avocado grafts with leaves on rootstock, where miR172 and PaTPS1 were upregulated. On the other hand, removing leaves results in an increase in miR156 abundance and downregulation of miR172/PaTPS1 in the scion b avocado grafts without leaves on clonal rootstock. This suggests a possibility of leaf-regulated graft transmissibility of signals affecting miR156, miR172 and TPS1 transcript abundance in the scion

Conclusions

In conclusion, here we suggest that grafted tree maturity is governed largely by the scion in avocado. However, we provide some evidence for graft transmissible regulation of miR156 and miR172, which may involve leaves below the graft union. Our findings are consistent with industry observations of grafted tree maturity and for the first time have started to explain the underlying molecular mechanisms involved. This information will help to better understand bottlenecks in grafting, graft success and propagation of horticultural trees, where type of scion and rootstock material greatly effect propagation success and operational costs.

Methods

Plant material and grafting

Avocado cv. ‘Hass’ and cv. ‘Velvick’ seeds and propagation material were provided by Anderson Horticulture Pty Ltd. and grown in Anderson nursery located in Duranbah, New South Wales, Australia. All avocado grafting experiments were generated at Anderson Horticulture Pty Ltd. nursery (appropriate permissions were obtained). Approx. 2 months old seedlings of cultivars ‘Velvick’ and ‘Hass’ were generated for seedling rootstocks and scions respectively. Clonal rootstocks of ‘Velvick’ were prepared using the Frolich method modified from Ernst, 1999 [36, 37], and ‘Hass’ mature scionwood (budwood) for mature scions was collected from adult trees as per commercial practise at Anderson Horticulture. Wedge grafts (Fig. 5a) were made in four possible combinations of 12 plants (scion/rootstock) (Fig. 5b-e): 1) budwood ‘Hass’/seedling ‘Velvick’, 2) budwood ‘Hass’/clonal ‘Velvick’, 3) seedling ‘Hass’/seedling ‘Velvick’, and 4) seedling ‘Hass’/clonal ‘Velvick’. Leaf samples were collected immediately pre-grafting and at 3 months and 6 months post-grafting. Another independent experiment was designed to determine the effect of clonal rootstock leaves on inter-graft signalling. Here budwood ‘Hass’ was grafted on ‘Velvick’ clonal rootstocks in two groups of 12 plants; 1) ‘With Leaves (WL)’ - where leaves were left on the rootstock as per conventional practice, 2) ‘Without Leaves (WOL)’ - where leaves were removed from the rootstock (Fig. 5f, g). Leaves for expression analysis were sampled 3 months post-grafting. In all cases, the youngest fully expanded leaf was sampled and pooled into three biological replicates directly on dry ice and stored at -80 °C freezer.

Fig. 5
figure5

Grafting techniques and combinations used. Schematic diagrams of a Wedge grafting in avocado. Simplified graphical representations of avocado graft combinations 3 months post-grafting: b seedling scionwood grafted on seedling rootstock, c mature scionwood grafted on seedling rootstock, d seedling scionwood grafted on clonal rootstock and e mature scionwood grafted on clonal rootstock. Photographs of avocado defoliation experiment combinations on the day of grafting: f grafts without leaves on rootstock, g grafts with leaves on rootstock

RNA extraction

Leaf tissues were ground to fine powder under liquid nitrogen and total RNA was extracted using a MasterPure Plant RNA Purification kit (Epicentre, USA). RNA was quantified using a Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer and quality assessed on 1% TAE agarose gels. For miRNA quantification, 500 ng total RNA was utilized for low-molecular weight cDNA synthesis (to quantify mature miRNAs) with a miScript Plant RT Kit (Qiagen, Netherlands). For gene quantification, 600 ng of total RNA was used to synthesize high molecular weight cDNA using a SensiFAST™ cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bioline, Australia).

Quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction

miRNA quantification

qRT-PCR reactions were performed in duplicate for each biological replicate using a miScript SYBR® Green PCR Kit (cDNA prepared using a miScript Plant RT Kit was utilized) (QIAGEN, The Netherland). The primer sequences of miRNAs (miR156 and miR172) and housekeeping transcripts (U6 [38], 5.8S rRNA [39]) are shown in Additional file 1: Table S3. Reactions were performed on a Rotor-Gene Q 6000 (Qiagen, The Netherlands) and visualized using Rotor-Gene Q 2.3.1.49 software (QIAGEN, The Netherland).

Gene quantification

Primer sequences from our recent manuscript [17] were utilized for gene quantification (Additional file 1: Table S3) using a SensiFAST™ SYBR® No-ROX Kit (Bioline, Australia) in a BioRad CFX384 Touch™ Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, USA) in accordance with manufacturer instructions and visualized on CFX Manager™ Software (Bio-Rad, USA).

For all qPCR runs, PCR efficiencies were computed using LinReg PCR version 7.5 (University of Amsterdam, Netherlands). This Data was then further analysed and evaluated to determine the relative abundance of miRNA and genes by employing the formula:

$$ \mathrm{Relative}\ \mathrm{abundance}/\mathrm{expression}=\mathrm{Gene}\ \mathrm{PE}\hat{\mkern6mu} \left(-\mathrm{Gene}\ \mathrm{Ct}\right)/\mathrm{Control}\ \mathrm{PE}\hat{\mkern6mu} \left(-\mathrm{Control}\ \mathrm{Ct}\right) $$

where PE is primer efficiency and Ct is cycle threshold of each reaction. To check statistical significance of the data, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was done with Tukey correction (a post-hoc multiple comparison tests to compare means) using SPSS version 23 (IBM, USA). The averages of relative expression of miRNAs and genes were plotted with standard error using GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software Inc.).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

miRNA:

microRNA

qRT-PCR:

Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

SPL :

SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE

WL:

With Leaves

WOL:

Without Leaves

References

  1. 1.

    Harada T. Grafting and RNA transport via phloem tissue in horticultural plants. Sci Hortic. 2010;125(4):545–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Notaguchi M, Higashiyama T, Suzuki T. Identification of mRNAs that move over long distances using an RNA-seq analysis of Arabidopsis/Nicotiana benthamiana heterografts. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015;56(2):311–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Thieme CJ, Rojas-Triana M, Stecyk E, Schudoma C, Zhang W, Yang L, Minãmbres M, Walther D, Schulze WX, Paz-Ares J, et al. Endogenous Arabidopsis messenger RNAs transported to distant tissues. Nature Plants. 2015;1.

  4. 4.

    Yang Y, Mao L, Jittayasothorn Y, Kang Y, Jiao C, Fei Z, Zhong GY: Messenger RNA exchange between scions and rootstocks in grafted grapevines. BMC Plant Biol 2015, 15(1).

  5. 5.

    Zhang W, Kollwig G, Stecyk E, Apelt F, Dirks R, Kragler F. Graft-transmissible movement of inverted-repeat-induced siRNA signals into flowers. Plant J. 2014;80(1):106–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Pant BD, Buhtz A, Kehr J, Scheible WR. MicroRNA399 is a long-distance signal for the regulation of plant phosphate homeostasis. Plant J. 2008;53(5):731–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Huen AK, Rodriguez-Medina C, Ho AYY, Atkins CA, Smith PMC. Long-distance movement of phosphate starvation-responsive microRNAs in Arabidopsis. Plant Biol. 2017;19(4):643–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Pagliarani C, Vitali M, Ferrero M, Vitulo N, Incarbone M, Lovisolo C, Valle G, Schubert A. The accumulation of miRNAs differentially modulated by drought stress is affected by grafting in grapevine. Plant Physiol. 2017;173(4):2180–95.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bhogale S, Mahajan AS, Natarajan B, Rajabhoj M, Thulasiram HV, Banerjee AK. MicroRNA156: a potential graft-transmissible microrna that modulates plant architecture and tuberization in Solanum tuberosum ssp. andigena. Plant Physiol. 2014;164(2):1011–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Martin A, Adam H, Díaz-Mendoza M, Źurczak M, González-Schain ND, Suárez-López P. Graft-transmissible induction of potato tuberization by the microRNA miR172. Development. 2009;136(17):2873–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Feng S, Xu Y, Guo C, Zheng J, Zhou B, Zhang Y, Ding Y, Zhang L, Zhu Z, Wang H, et al. Modulation of miR156 to identify traits associated with vegetative phase change in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). J Exp Bot. 2016;67(5):1493–504.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    He J, Xu M, Willmann MR, McCormick K, Hu T, Yang L, Starker CG, Voytas DF, Meyers BC, Poethig RS: Threshold-dependent repression of SPL gene expression by miR156/miR157 controls vegetative phase change in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet 2018, 14(4).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Huijser P, Schmid M. The control of developmental phase transitions in plants. Development. 2011;138(19):4117–29.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Poethig RS. Phase change and the regulation of developmental timing in plants. Science. 2003;301(5631):334–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Wang JW, Park MY, Wang LJ, Koo Y, Chen XY, Weigel D, Poethig RS: MiRNA control of vegetative phase change in trees. PLoS Genet 2011, 7(2).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Zhang L, Hu YB, Wang HS, Feng SJ, Zhang YT. Involvement of miR156 in the regulation of vegetative phase change in plants. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2015;140(5):387–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ahsan MU, Hayward A, Irihimovitch V, Fletcher SJ, Tanurdzic M, Pocock A, Beveridge CA, Mitter N. Juvenility and vegetative phase transition in tropical/subtropical tree crops. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:729.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Yang L, Conway SR, Poethig RS. Vegetative phase change is mediated by a leaf-derived signal that represses the transcription of miR156. Development. 2011;138(2):245–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wang H, Wang H. The miR156/SPL module, a regulatory hub and versatile toolbox, gears up crops for enhanced agronomic traits. Mol Plant. 2015;8(5):677–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Yang L, Xu M, Koo Y, He J, Scott Poethig R: Sugar promotes vegetative phase change in Arabidopsis thaliana by repressing the expression of MIR156A and MIR156C. eLife 2013, 2013(2).

  21. 21.

    Yu S, Lian H, Wang J-W. Plant developmental transitions: the role of microRNAs and sugars. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2015;27:1–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Wahl V, Ponnu J, Schlereth A, Arrivault S, Langenecker T, Franke A, Feil R, Lunn JE, Stitt M, Schmid M. Regulation of flowering by Trehalose-6-phosphate signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science. 2013;339(6120):704–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    De Villiers A, Ernst A. Avocado rootstock research: Principels and practices. World Avocado Congress. 2015;8:40–5.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Wu G, Park MY, Conway SR, Wang JW, Weigel D, Poethig RS. The sequential action of miR156 and miR172 regulates developmental timing in Arabidopsis. Cell. 2009;138(4):750–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Yamaguchi A, Wu MF, Yang L, Wu G, Poethig RS, Wagner D. The MicroRNA-regulated SBP-box transcription factor SPL3 is a direct upstream activator of LEAFY, FRUITFULL, and APETALA1. Dev Cell. 2009;17(2):268–78.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Jung JH, Lee HJ, Ryu JY, Park CM. SPL3/4/5 integrate developmental aging and photoperiodic signals into the FT-FD module in Arabidopsis flowering. Mol Plant. 2016;9(12):1647–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Jung JH, Ju Y, Seo PJ, Lee JH, Park CM. The SOC1-SPL module integrates photoperiod and gibberellic acid signals to control flowering time in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2012;69(4):577–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Jung JH, Seo PJ, Kang SK. Park CM: miR172 signals are incorporated into the miR156 signaling pathway at the SPL3/4/5 genes in Arabidopsis developmental transitions. Plant Mol Biol. 2011;76(1–2):35–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Mathieu J, Yant LJ, Mürdter F, Küttner F, Schmid M: Repression of flowering by the miR172 target SMZ. PLoS Biol 2009, 7(7).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Sanchez-Gutierrez A, Ovando-Medina I, Adriano-Anaya L, Vazquez-Ovando A, Salvador-Figueroa M. Dynamics of miR156 and miR172 involved in the flowering of Jatropha curcas L. Acta Botanica Brasilica. 2018;32(1):99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Jung JH, Lee S, Yun J, Lee M, Park CM. The miR172 target TOE3 represses AGAMOUS expression during Arabidopsis floral patterning. Plant Sci. 2014;215-216:29–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Yan Z, Hossain MS, Wang J, Valdés-López O, Liang Y, Libault M, Qiu L. Stacey G: miR172 regulates soybean nodulation. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2013;26(12):1371–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Hannapel D, Sharma P, Lin T. Phloem-mobile RNAs and root development. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4:257.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Li C, Gu M, Shi N, Zhang H, Yang X, Osman T, Liu Y, Wang H, Vatish M, Jackson S, et al. Mobile FT mRNA contributes to the systemic florigen signalling in floral induction. Sci Rep. 2011;1:73.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Turnbull C. Long-distance regulation of flowering time. J Exp Bot. 2011;62(13):4399–413.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Frolich EF, Platt RG. Use of the etiolation technique in rooting avocado cuttings. California Avocado Society Yearbook. 1972;55:97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ernst A. Micro cloning: a multiple cloning technique for avocados using micro containers. Revista Chapingo Serie Horticultura. 1999;5:217–20.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Cheah BH, Nadarajah K, Divate MD, Wickneswari R. Identification of four functionally important microRNA families with contrasting differential expression profiles between drought-tolerant and susceptible rice leaf at vegetative stage. BMC Genomics. 2015;16(1):692.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Chen F, Zhang X, Zhang N, Wang S, Yin G, Dong Z, Cui D. Combined small RNA and Degradome sequencing reveals novel MiRNAs and their targets in the high-yield mutant wheat strain Yunong 3114. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0137773.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge Anderson Horticulture Pty Ltd. (Duranbah, NSW, Australia) for providing materials, technical and logistic support to conduct this work.

Funding

This project was jointly supported by the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries (DAF; Queensland, Australia), the University of Queensland, Australia and the NSW Department of Primary Industries (New South Wales, Australia) as part of the Small Tree High Productivity Initiative co-funded by Horticulture Innovation Australia Limited (Hort Innovation) using the across horticulture levy and voluntary contributions from DAF and matching funds from the Australian Government through the Hort Innovation project “Transforming tropical/subtropical tree crop productivity”.

The funding organizations provided the financial support and were not involved in the design of the experiment, collection, interpretation or analysis of data or in the drafting of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.U.A., A.H. and N.M. conceived and designed the study. M.U.A. and A.H. conducted field/glasshouse experiments. M.U.A. performed all lab experiments. M.U.A. and J.B. collected phenotypic data. M.U.A. analysed, interpreted and performed statistics on experimental data. M.U.A. and A.H. wrote the manuscript. M.A., B.T., C.B. and N.M., provided technical feedback and edited the manuscript. All the authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neena Mitter.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We declare that permissions were obtained to use the plant materials and to conduct the experiments in this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. Expression analysis of a PaSPL9a, b PaSPL9b, c PaRAP2.7A and d PaAP2 in pre-graft avocado leaves sampled from the seedling rootstock, clonal rootstock, seedling scion and budwood scion. Error bars represent standard error of the mean (n = 3), and significant differences are shown in different letters (p < 0.05). Figure S2. Expression analysis of a PaSPL9a, b PaSPL9b, c PaRAP2.7A and d PaAP2 in post grafting avocado leaves, cv. Hass as scion and cv. Velvick as rootstock. Where, S/S = seedling scion on seedling rootstock, B/S = budwood scion on seedling rootstock, S/C = seedling scion on clonal rootstock and B/C = budwood scion on clonal rootstock. Error bars represent standard error of the mean (n = 3). Table S1. Graft success observed for avocado grafts. Table S2. Phenotypic observation for flowering and plant height in the avocado grafted plants. Where, Hb = Budwood Hass, Hs = Seedling Hass used as scion, Vs = Velvick seedling rootstock and Vc = Velvick Clonal rootstock. Table S3. Primers used for miRNA and gene quantification. (DOCX 432 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahsan, M.U., Hayward, A., Alam, M. et al. Scion control of miRNA abundance and tree maturity in grafted avocado. BMC Plant Biol 19, 382 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1994-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • miR156
  • miR172
  • SPL
  • Juvenility
  • Grafting
  • Scion
  • Rootstock
  • Graft-transmissibility
  • Avocado
  • TPS1