Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Interactive effect of 24-epibrassinolide and silicon alleviates cadmium stress via the modulation of antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems and macronutrient content in Pisum sativum L. seedlings

BMC Plant Biology201818:146

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1359-5

  • Received: 21 November 2017
  • Accepted: 2 July 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

This study assessed the effects of 24-epibrassinolide (EBL, 10–7M) and silicon (2 mM) on the alleviation of cadmium (Cd, 150 mg L–1) toxicity in Pisum sativum L. seedlings via the modulation of growth, antioxidant defense, glyoxalase system, and nutrient uptake.

Results

Shoot and root lengths declined by 46.43% and 52.78%, respectively, following Cd stress. Shoot and root dry weights also declined with Cd toxicity. Biochemical and physiological aspects exhibit significant decline including total chlorophyll (33.09%), carotenoid (51.51%), photosynthetic efficiency (32.60%), photochemical quenching (19.04%), leaf relative water content (40.18%), and gas exchange parameters (80.65%). However, EBL or Si supplementation alone or in combination modulates the previously mentioned parameters. Cadmium stress increased proline and glycine betaine (GB) contents by 4.37 and 2.41-fold, respectively. Exposure of plants to Cd stress increased the accumulation of H2O2, malondialdehyde content, electrolyte leakage, and methylglyoxal, which declined significantly with EBL and Si supplementation, both individually and in combination. Similarly, Cd stress adversely affected enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants, but EBL and/or Si supplementation maintained antioxidant levels. Glyoxalase I (GlyI) accumulated after Cd stress and increased further with the application of EBL and Si. However, GlyII content declined after Cd stress but increased with supplementation of EBL and Si. Cadmium accumulation occurred in the following order: roots > shoots>leaves. Supplementation with EBL and Si, individually and in combination reduced Cd accumulation and enhanced the uptake of macronutrients and micronutrients in shoots and roots, which declined with Cd toxicity.

Conclusion

The application of 24-EBL and Si, individually and in combination, alleviated the adverse effects of Cd by improving growth, biochemical parameters, nutrient uptake, osmolyte accumulation, and the anti-oxidative defense and glyoxalase systems in Pisum sativum seedlings.

Keywords

  • Pisum sativum
  • Cadmium stress
  • 24-Epibrassinolide
  • Silicon
  • Lipid peroxidation
  • Antioxidants
  • Glyoxalase system

Background

Heavy metal contamination is a serious threat caused by anthropogenic activities such as mining, wastewater and sewage sludge utilization for irrigationpurposes, phosphate fertilizer application, and increased vehicular and industrial emissions [13]. Heavy metal contamination causes morphological, physiological, biochemical, and ultra-structural alterations in plants [4]. Cadmium (Cd) is among the comparatively mobile heavy metals in soil and is highly toxic to both plants and animals [5, 6]. Cadmium accumulates progressively in humans via the food chain [69], leading to human disorders such as Itai-Itai disease, cancer, neurotoxicity, and nephrotoxicity [5]. Vegetables and cereals are the primary food sources for the world’s population. Accumulation of Cd in vegetables is noted when fields are irrigated with wastewater and sewage sludge in peri-urban areas [10]. Cd toxicity reduces plant growth, biomass, photosynthesis, yield, and quality [11, 12]. Further, it impairs mineral nutrition in plants [13, 14]. Several studies have shown that Cd toxicity alters nitrogen metabolism, reduces photosynthetic efficiency caused by impaired chlorophyll synthesis, and reduces carbon fixation [8, 9]. Increased Cd accumulation hampers root morphology, resulting in stunted growth [15], and thus causes oxidative stress in vegetables via the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which damage the antioxidant enzyme system [1, 16]. To tolerate Cd stress, plants have developed advanced tolerance strategies, including osmoprotectant synthesis and antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems [1, 8, 1620]. Enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants related to the ascorbate–glutathione cycle have a crucial role in stress tolerance mechanisms in plants [2, 17, 21]. The enzymatic antioxidants include superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), glutathione reductase (GR), monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR), dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR), and glutathione-S-transferase (GST); non-enzymatic antioxidants include ascorbic acid (AsA) and glutathione (GSH). In addition to the antioxidant defense system, the glyoxalase system [glyoxalase I (Gly I) and glyoxalase II (Gly II)] facilitates the detoxification of methylglyoxal (MG) [21, 22]. However, Cd toxicity exhibits diverse specificity within vegetable cultivars and genotypes [23, 24]. Leafy vegetables accumulate more Cd than vegetable roots and tubers [25].

Numerous strategies have been proposed to combat Cd toxicity encompassing the exogenous application of organic and inorganic amendment such as plant growth regulators as well as mineral amendments like silicon and selenium [1, 2, 10, 1618, 2628]. Among the phytohormones significance of brassinosteroids (BRs) in alleviation of stress is more expansively reported [2, 2932]. Mineral amendment in plant media has also been reported of functional significance to alleviate heavy metal toxicity. Silicon (Si) is the one among such minerals that is well documented for the amelioration of various biotic and abiotic stresses [33, 34]. Accumulation of Si under the leaf surface enhances both biotic and abiotic stress tolerance by reducing the transpiration rate and thus restoring water utilization competence [35]. Si bio-fortification is also associated with an improved oxidative defense system and enhanced membrane integrity in plants subjected to various abiotic and biotic stresses [8, 34].

Brassinosteroids are a category of steroidal phytohormones that are present in plant parts, including roots [24]; they modulate an extensive range of physiological responses, including cellular and metabolic functions [8]. Moreover, BRs exhibit diverse ameliorative effects against varied stresses such as thermal stress [36], oxidative damage [37], and heavy metal toxicity [38, 39]. Studies have shown that exogenous BRs alleviated Cd stress in tomato [40], bean [41], tobacco [42], and peanut [43]. The possible relevance of BRs in agriculture is determined primarily by their competence to augment crop yield and modulate stress-induced damage. However, whether Si and 24-epibrassinolide (EBL) can ameliorate Cd-induced physiological and metabolic alterations is still unraveled.

Pea is an important legume crop that is widely cultivated globally for its nutritive value. The indiscriminate use of fertilizers has caused an enormous flow of Cd into pea fields, which has become detrimental to the quality of pea for human and livestock consumption. Numerous health risks are associated with Cd uptake by plants [44]. Keeping in view the alleviation potential of EBL and Si against Cd toxicity, we hypothesize that individual and combined treatment of Si and EBL can modulate biochemical status and anti-oxidant defense system in pea seedlings. Therefore, this study evaluated the effect of EBL and Si, individually and in combination, on the growth, physiology, nutrient uptake, and antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems in pea plants grown under Cd stress.

Methods

Seeds of pea (Pisum sativum L.) were sterilized using 5% NaOCl for 5 min and washed with double-distilled water. Seeds were pretreated with EBL (10–7M) for 8 h. The seeds were sown in pots containing sand, perlite, and peat in a 1:1:1 ratio. After germination, seedlings were thinned to one per pot. From sowing to 10 days of seedling growth, pots were supplemented with 200 mL full-strength Hoagland solution every alternate day [45]. After 10 days, seedlings were treated with Cd (CdSO4·8H2O; 150 mg L–1) in a modified Hoagland solution. Silicon (2 mM, 10mL) was supplemented in the form of Na2SiO3 with Hoagland solution. Silicon was supplied every alternate day to plants after one week of NaCl treatment up to 40 days. Pots were maintained in a growth chamber set at 26 ± 2 °C/15 ± 2 °C day/night temperatures, 70–75% relative humidity, and an average 18 h light dark photoperiod. After 40 days of treatment, the plants were carefully uprooted and analyzed for different parameters. The biochemical and antioxidant activities were estimated using secondary leaves.

Determination of growth parameters

Shoot and root lengths were measuredwith a ruler. Shoot and root fresh weights (FW) were determined immediately after harvesting, and dry weights (DW) were determined after oven drying at 70°C for 72 h.

Determination of pigments

Chlorophyll content in leaves was extracted using dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), and absorbance was determined spectrophotometrically at 480, 510, 645, and 663 nm (Beckman 640 D, USA) against DMSO [46]. The total carotenoid content was determined using 80% acetone extracts of the plant material, according to the spectrophotometric method of Lichtenthaler and Wellburn [47].

Chlorophyll fluorescence

Chlorophyll fluorescence was measured using a portable pulse modulation fluorometer (PAM 2500; Waltz GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany). Leaves from each plant were randomly selected from one replication per treatment and dark-adapted for approximately 10 min (based on the previous experiment),before measuring initial fluorescence (Fo), maximal fluorescence (Fm), actual photochemical efficiency of PSII (Φ PSII), photochemical quenching (qP), and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) at 1200 μmol m–2s–1PAR. After the actinic light (AL) source was removedand 3 s of far-red light was applied, the minimal fluorescence of the light-adapted state (Fo′) was obtained. Steady-state fluorescence (Fs) was determined under AL (λ = 665 nm). The relative effective quantum yield of photochemical energy conversion at steady-state photosynthesis was calculated as yield = (Fm′ − Fs)/Fm′, where Fs and Fm′ are the fluorescence at steady-state photosynthesis and maximum fluorescence in the light, respectively. Next, qP, Φ PSII, and NPQ were calculated as (Fm′ − Fs)/(Fm′ − Fo′), (Fm′ − Fs)/Fm′, and (Fm − Fm′)/Fm, respectively [48].

Determination of H2O2 content, lipid peroxidation, and electrolyte leakage

Fresh leaf samples (500 mg) were homogenized in 5 mL of trichloroacetic acid (0.1%, w/v), and the homogenate centrifuged at 12,000g for 15 min. Next, 0.5 mL supernatant was mixed with 0.5 mL of 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and 1 mL of 1 M potassium iodide. The optical density was recorded at 390 nm [49].

The method of Madhava Rao and Sresty [50] was used to measure lipid peroxidation (formation of malondialdehyde (MDA). Fresh leaf tissue (500 mg) was homogenized in 2.5 mL of trichloroacetic acid (0.1%), followed by centrifugation at 10,000gfor 10 min. Next, a 1mL aliquot was mixed with 4 mL of 20% trichloroacetic acid containing 0.5% of thiobarbituric acid, and heated at 95°C for 30 min. The mixture was cooledin anice bath and centrifuged again for 15 min at 10,000g. The absorbance was measured at 532 nm, and corrections were performedfor unspecific turbidity by subtracting the absorbance at 600 nm.

To estimate electrolyte leakage, 20 leaf discs were immersed in test tubes containing deionized water, and the electrical conductivity was measured (ECa). Subsequently, tubes were heated in a water bath for 25 min at 50°C, and the electrical conductivity (ECb) was measured. The tubes were heated again for 10min at 100°C, and the electrical conductivity (ECc) was measured [51]. Electrolyte leakage (EL) was calculated as follows:
$$ \mathrm{Electrolyte}\ \mathrm{leakage}\ \left(\%\right)=\frac{{\mathrm{EC}}_{\mathrm{b}}-{\mathrm{EC}}_{\mathrm{a}}}{{\mathrm{EC}}_{\mathrm{c}}}\times 100 $$

Measurement of methylglyoxal level

The method of Wild, et al. [52] was used to estimate methylglyoxal (MG). Fresh leaves (500 mg) were crushed in perchloric acid (5%) and subjected to centrifugation at 4°C for 10 min at 11,000g. The collected supernatant was mixed with charcoal to decolorize and then neutralized with saturated potassium carbonate solution. Sodium dihydrogen phosphate and N-acetyl-l-cysteine was added to neutralize the supernatant used for MG estimation, and the final volume was madeup to 1 mL. The formation of product N-α-acetyl-S-(1-hydroxy-2-oxo-prop-1-yl) cysteine after 10 min was recorded at 288nm using a spectrophotometer (Beckman640D, USA). A known concentration of MG was used to generate the standard curve, and MG was expressed as μmol g–1 FW.

Estimation of physiological parameters

Gas exchange parameters were determined when the plants were 26-weeks-old. Net photosynthesis (Pn), CO2 assimilation rate (A), stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration rate (E), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), and CO2 resistance (Rs) were determined using an infrared gas analyzer (LCA-4 model; Analytical Development Company, Hoddesdon, England) and the uppermost fully expanded leaves.

Estimation of leaf relative water content, proline, and glycinebetaine

The relative water content (RWC) in leaves was measured according to Yamasaki and Dillenburg [53], , and calculations were performed using the following formula:
$$ \mathrm{RWC}\ \left(\%\right)=\left(\mathrm{Fresh}\ \mathrm{weight}-\mathrm{Dry}\ \mathrm{weight}/\mathrm{Turgid}\ \mathrm{weight}-\mathrm{Dry}\ \mathrm{weight}\right)\times 100 $$

Proline content was determined following the method of Bates, et al. [54]. Absorbance was recorded spectrophotometrically at 520 nm (Beckman 640 D, USA) using toluene as a blank.

The method of Grieve and Grattan [55] was used to estimate glycine betaine (GB). Absorbance was measured at 365 nm using a spectrophotometer, and calculations were performed using the reference standard for GB (50–200 mg mL–1).

Extraction of enzymes and their assay

Fresh leaves (0.5g) were macerated using a chilled mortar and pestle in phosphate buffer (0.1M, pH 7.5) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, 0.5 mM). The homogenate was filtered through four layers of muslin cloth and subjected to centrifugation at 12,000 g for 10 min at 4°C. The resulting supernatant was used for the enzyme assays.

Superoxide dismutase (SOD; EC1.15.1.1) activity was determined by measuring the ability of theenzyme to inhibit the photochemical reduction of nitrobluetetrazoliumchloride, as described by Beyer and Fridovich [56]. The absorbance of the reaction mixture was read at 560nm, and one unit of SOD activity (EU) was defined as the amount of enzyme required to inhibit 50% of the NBT photoreduction rate and expressed as EU mg–1 protein.

APX (EC 1.11.1.11) was assayed following a reduction in absorbance at 290 nm for 3 min, with the activity expressed as EU mg–1 protein [57].

Catalase (CAT; EC 1.11.1.6) activity was measured using the method of Aebi [58], with the change in absorbance recorded at 240 nm for 3 min. CAT activity was expressed as unit mg–1 protein.

To estimateglutathione reductase (GR; EC 1.6.4.2) activity, the method of Foyer and Halliwell [59] was used, and the reductionin absorbance measured at 340 nm for 3 min. The GR activity was expressed as EU mg–1 protein.

Glutathione-S-transferase (GST; EC 2.5.1.18) was estimated following Hasanuzzaman and Fujita [60], and the increase in absorbance measured at 340nm for 3 min witha spectrophotometer (Beckman 640D, USA). The GST activity was expressed as EU mg–1 protein.

Monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR; EC 1.6.5.4) activity was estimated following the method of Miyake and Asada [61]. The change in absorbance was observed at 340nm for 3 min, with the activity expressed as EU mg–1 protein.

The activity of dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR; EC 1.8.5.1) was estimated using the method of Nakano, et al. [57]. The absorbance was read at 265nm for 3 min using a spectrophotometer (Beckman640D, USA),with the activity expressed as EU mg–1 protein.

Glyoxalase I (EC: 4.4.1.5) activity was estimated according to the method of Hasanuzzaman, et al. [23]. The assay mixture contained 100 mM K-P buffer (pH 7.0), 15 mM magnesium sulfate, 1.7 mM GSH, and 3.5 mM MG. The reaction was started by adding MG; the increase in absorbance was recorded at 240 nm using a spectrophotometer (Beckman 640D, USA) for 1 min, with the activity expressed as μmol min–1 mg–1 protein.

Glyoxalase II (EC: 3.1.2.6) was estimated using the method of Principato, et al. [62]. The reaction mixture contained 100 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 7.2), 0.2 mM DTNB, and 1 mM S-d-lactoylglutathione (SLG). The reaction was started by adding SLG, and theabsorbance at 412 nm was measured usinga spectrophotometer (Beckman 640D, USA). The activity was expressed as μmol min–1 mg–1 protein.

Non-enzymatic antioxidants

Ascorbate was extracted from fresh leaves (0.8g) in 3mL ice-cold metaphosphoric acid (5%) containing 1mM EDTA and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was distributed in two separate micro centrifuge tubes (400 μl in each) for the assay of total ascorbate (As + DAs) and reduced ascorbate. DAs concentration was then deduced from the difference. To each tube 200 μl of 10% TCA was added and vortexed mixed. 10 μl of NaOH solution was then added to it, mixed and the mixture was centrifuged for 2 min in microcentrifuge. To 200 μl of the supernatant, 200 μl of 150 mM of NaH2PO4 and 200 μl of water were added. To another 200 μl of supernatant, 200 μl of buffer and 100 μl of 10 μl of 10 mM DDT were added and thoroughly mixed. Then 100 μl of 0.5% N- Ethylmaleimide was added to each tube. Both samples were vortexed mixed and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. To each tube was then added 400 μl of 10% TCA, 400 μl of 44% H3 PO4, 4μl of 4% bipyridyl and 200 μl of 3% FeCl3. After vortexed mixing, samples were incubated at 33°c for 60 min. The supernatant was then used for ascorbate analysis [63], and the absorbance was recorded at 525 nm on uv-vis spectrophotometer (Model Du 640, Beckman, USA).

The method of Yu, et al. [64] was used to estimate the glutathione pool, and standard curves with known concentrations of GSH and GSSG were used for calculations. 0.5 g of fresh leaf was homogenized in 2 ml of 5% sulphosalicylic acid under cold condition. The homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. 0.5 ml of aliquot was taken in a micro centrifuge tube, to which 0.6 ml of reaction buffer and 40 μl of DTNB was added. Absorbance for determination of GSH was read at 412 nm on uv- vis spectrophotometer (Model DU 640, Beckman, USA) after 2 min. To the same tube 50 μl of NADPH and 2 μl of GR was added for the determination of total glutathione. Subtracting the reduced glutathione from total glutathione determines the oxidized glutathione. The reaction was allowed to run for 30 min. at 25°C. The change in absorbance at 412nm on UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Model DU 640, Beckman, USA) was recorded. Values are corrected for the absorbance of supernatant and DTNB.

Estimation of Cd and inorganic nutrients

Shoot, root and leaf samples (100 mg each) were digested in H2SO4/HNO3 mixture (1/5, v/v) for 24h and subsequently treated with HNO3/HClO4mixture (5/1, v/v). Cadmium and other micronutrients (B, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn) and macronutrients (S, Mg, Ca, K, P) in the solution were determined using a Perkin–Elmer (Analyst Model 300) atomic absorption spectrophotometer. The Cd content was expressed as μmol g–1DW and the other nutrients were expressed as μg g–1DW.

Statistical analysis

Data presented arethe means of five replicates with ±SE. Data were analyzed following one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS software version 17. The P values at 0.05 were considered significant. Mean values followed by the same lettersdo not significantly differ at P< 0.05.

Results

Silicon and 24-EBL augmentedplant growth and biomass

Figure 1ad shows the growth response (shoot and root DWs and lengths) of pea seedlings to Cd stress (150 mg L–1) and the individual and combined effects of EBL and Si. Cadmium stress alone reduced shoot and root lengths by 46.43% and 52.78%, respectively, relative to theuntreated control. In control plants, EBL alone did not affect the shoot and root lengths of control plants. In Cd-stressed seedlings, shoot and root lengths increased by 28.89% and 41.71%, respectively, with EBL, and by 34.70% and 51.31%, respectively, with Si, relative to seedlings exposed to Cd alone (Fig. 1a, b). However, the combined treatment of EBL+Si enhanced shoot and root lengths by 57.47% and 82.66%, respectively, relative to seedlings exposed to Cd alone.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Effect of 24-epibrassinolide and silicon individually and in combination on (a) shoot length, (b) root length, (c) shoot DW and (d) root DW in Pisum sativum seedlings under Cd stress. Data presented are the means ± SE (n = 5). Different letters indicate significant difference at P ≤ 0.05

Shoot and root DWs decreased by 52.78% and 62.35%, respectively, in the Cd-alone treatment, relative to the untreated control. However, the Cd + EBL +Si treatment increased shoot and root DWs by 96.87% and 42.85%, respectively, relative to Cd alone, and was more effective than the individual treatments (Fig. 1c, d).

Silicon and 24-EBL augments pigment content

Total chl and carotenoid contents declined by 33.09% and 51.51%, respectively, in Cd-treated plants, relative to the control treatment. In Cd-treated seedlings, total chl and carotenoid contents increased by 19.35% and 18.75%, respectively, with EBL, and by 25.80% and 31.25%, respectively, with Si, relative to seedlings exposed to Cd alone (Fig. 2a, b). The combined Cd + EBL+Si treatment increased total chl and carotenoid contents by 36.55% and 100%, respectively, relative to Cd alone, and was more effective than the individual treatments.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Effect of 24-epibrassinolide and silicon individually and in combination on (a) total chlorophyll, (b) carotenoid content, (c) Fv/Fm, (d) ΦPSII, (e) qP and (f) NPQ in Pisum sativum seedlings under Cd stress. Data presented are the means ± SE (n = 5). Different letters indicate significant difference at P ≤ 0.05

Silicon and 24-EBL improved photosynthetic efficiency

The effects of Cd, EBL, and Si on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters are shown in Fig. 2cf. The Cd-alone treatment significantly reduced Fv/Fm (by 32.60%), ΦPSII (by 27.27%), and qP (by 19.04%) but increased NPQ (by 51.02%),relative to untreated controlseedlings. Individual applications of EBL and Si increased Fv/Fm, ΦPSII, and qPanddecreased NPQ in Cd-treated and control seedlings. The combined Cd + EBL+Si treatment was more effective, with Fv/Fm, ΦPSII, and qPincreasing by 41.93%, 45.83%, and 29.41%, respectively, and NPQ decreasing by 29.72%, compared to Cd alone.

Silicon and 24-EBL modulated physiological status

The Cd-alone treatment reduced all the gas exchange parameters, i.e., Pn, A, gs, and E by 46.17%, 56.26%, 80.65%, and 73.00%, respectively, relative to the control seedlings (Table 1). The Cd +EBL treatment increased Pn by 24.61%, A by 27.67%, gs by 137.28%, and E by 93.18%, relative to Cd alone. The Cd + Si treatment also enhanced all the parameters. The combined Cd + EBL+Si treatment had a more pronounced effect, increasing Pn by 64.67%, A by 68.53%, gs by 425.42%, and E by 165.90%, relative to Cd alone.
Table 1

Effect of 24-epibrassinolide and silicon individually and in combination on gas exchange parameters (Pn, A, gs, E) (E) RWC, Proline and glycine betaine content in Pisum sativum seedlings under Cd stress

Treatment

Net photosynthesis rate Pn (μM m-1 S-1)

CO2 assimilation rate A (μM CO2 m-2 S-1)

Stomatal conductance gs (mM CO2 m-2 S-1)

Transpiration rate E (mM H2O m-2 S-1)

Proline (μg g-1 fw)

GB (μg g-1 fw)

RWC (%)

 

C

12.15±0.075c

13.88±0.031d

305±1.19d

1.63±0.014c

26.31±0.23f

2.04±0.011e

92.77±0.3b

 

C+EBL

12.37±0.073c

14.03±0.027c

380±2.671b

1.77±0.022b

27.44±0.13e

2.05±0.016e

93.52±0.508b

 

C+Si

13.01±0.079b

14.95±0.08b

385±1.682b

1.75±0.018b

27.15±0.15e

2.17±0.03d

93.77±0.316b

 

C+EBL+Si

14.21±0.091a

16.07±0.092a

401±2.753a

1.88±0.029a

28.37±0.25d

2.23±0.039d

95.42±0.125a

 

Cd

6.54±0.022f

6.07±0.025g

59±3.695g

0.44±0.028f

115±1.7c

4.93±0.036c

55.49±0.511e

 

Cd+EBL

8.15±0.034e

7.75±0.044f

140±3.391e

0.85±0.011e

125±1.59b

5.74±0.05b

74.21±0.276d

 

Cd+Si

8.65±0.035e

7.81±0.043f

120±2.372f

0.89±0.012e

129±1.62b

5.87±0.053b

76.84±0.588d

 

Cd+EBL+Si

10.77±0.055d

10.23±0.063e

310±1.12c

1.17±0.018d

154±1.74a

6.14±0.072a

88.42±0.155c

 

Data presented are the means ± SE (n = 5). Different letters next to the number indicate significant difference at P ≤ 0.05

Silicon and 24-EBL ameliorated proline, glycine betaine and leaf relative water contents

Cadmium stress alone reduced RWC by 40.18%, relative to the control. The Cd + EBL, Cd + Si, and Cd + EBL + Si treatments increased RWC by 33.73%, 38.47%, and 59.34%, respectively, relative to Cd alone (Table 1).

The Cd-alone treatment increased proline and GB contents by 4.37-fold and 2.41-fold, respectively, relative to the control. These values were further increased with EBL (1.08-fold for proline and 1.16-fold for GB), Si (1.12-fold and 1.19-fold, respectively) and EBL + Si combined (1.33-fold and 1.24-fold, respectively) (Table 1).

Silicon and 24-EBL reduced hydrogen peroxide MDA contents, and electrolyte leakage and methyl glyoxalase

Cadmium stress alone increased H2O2 production by 325.49%, relative to the control seedlings. The Cd + EBL, Cd + Si, and Cd + EBL + Si treatments decreased H2O2 by 27.02%, 32.43%, and 64.24%, respectively, relative to Cd alone (Fig. 3a).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Effect of 24-epibrassinolide and silicon individually and in combination on (a) H2O2 content, (b) MDA content (c) EL and (d) MG in Pisum sativum seedlings under Cd stress. Data presented are the means ± SE (n = 5). Different letters indicate significant difference at P ≤ 0.05

Cadmium stress alone increased lipid peroxidation (estimatedfrom MDA content) by 70.71%, relative to the control seedlings. The Cd + EBL, Cd + Si, and Cd + EBL + Si treatments decreased MDA content by 10.63%, 14.00%, and 29.03%, respectively, relative to Cd alone (Fig. 3b).

Cadmium stress alone increased electrolyte leakage by 409.93%, relative to the control. The Cd + EBL, Cd + Si, and Cd + EBL + Si treatments reduced electrolyte leakage by 20.04%, 24.03%, and 46.06%, respectively, relative to Cd alone (Fig. 3c).

Cadmium stress alone increased MG accumulation by 80.70%, relative to the control. The Cd + EBL, Cd + Si, and Cd + EBL + Si treatments decreased MG by 20.94%, 20.33%, and 32.75%, respectively, relative to Cd alone (Fig. 3d).

Silicon and 24-EBL modulated antioxidant activity

The Cd-alone treatment increased SOD activity by 152.92%, relative to the control treatment. The Cd + EBL, Cd + Si, and Cd + EBL + Si treatments further enhanced this activity by 12.00%, 24.23%, and 35.93%, respectively (Fig. 4a).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Effect of 24-epibrassinolide and silicon individually and in combination on (a) SOD, (b) CAT and (c) GST in Pisum sativum seedlings under Cd stress. Data presented are the means ± SE (n = 5). Different letters indicate significant difference at P ≤ 0.05

Cadmium stress alone increased CAT activity by 28.96%, relative to the control treatment. The Cd + EBL, Cd + Si, and Cd + EBL + Si treatments further enhanced this activity by 32.31%, 41.45%,and78.91%, respectively (Fig. 4b).

Cadmium stress alone increased GST activity by 57.51%, relative to the control. The Cd + EBL, Cd + Si, and Cd + EBL + Si treatments further enhanced this activity by 20.44%, 22.11%, and 50.80%, respectively (Fig. 4c).

The Cd-alone treatment increased APX activity by 118.35%, relative to the control. The Cd + EBL, Cd + Si, and Cd + EBL + Si treatments further enhanced this activity by 18.80%, 20.35%, and 53.31%, respectively (Fig. 5a).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Effect of 24-epibrassinolide and silicon individually and in combination on (a) APX, (b) GR, (c) MDHARand (d) DHAR in Pisum sativum seedlings under Cd stress. Data presented are the means ± SE (n = 5). Different letters indicate significant difference at P ≤ 0.05

Cadmium stress alone increased GR activity by 84.32%, relative to the control. The Cd + EBL, Cd + Si, and Cd + EBL + Si treatments further enhanced this activity by 4.08%, 7.82%, and 29.42%, respectively (Fig. 5b).

The Cd-alone treatment reduced MDHAR and DHAR activities (Fig. 5c, d) by 45.63% and 40.03%, respectively, relative to the control. The Cd + EBL treatment increased the activity of MDHAR by 40.61% and DHAR by 31.35%, relative to the Cd-alone treatment. The combined Cd+EBL+Si treatment further enhanced MDHAR and DHAR activities by 57.56% and 49.62%, respectively, relative to the Cd-alone treatment.

Cadmium stress alone reduced the AsA content by 60.00%, relative to the control (Fig. 6a). The Cd + EBL, Cd + Si, and Cd + EBL + Si treatments improved AsA accumulation by 50.00%, 62.50%, and 112.50%, respectively, relative to the Cd-alone treatment.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Effect of 24-epibrassinolide and silicon individually and in combination on (a) AsA, (b) GSH and (c) GSSG in Pisum sativum seedlings under Cd stress. Data presented are the means ± SE (n = 5). Different letters indicate significant difference at P ≤ 0.05

The Cd-alone treatment increased GSH content by 68.61%, relative tothe control. The Cd + EBL, Cd + Si, and Cd + EBL + Si treatments further enhanced GSH content by 23.08%, 33.79%, and 50.91%, respectively, relative to the Cd-alone treatment (Fig. 6b).

Cadmium stress alone reduced GSSG content by 35.43%,relative to the controls. The Cd + EBL, Cd + Si, and Cd + EBL + Si treatments further enhanced GSSH content by 41.71%, 44.83%, and 56.97%, respectively, relative to the Cd-alone treatment (Fig. 6c).

Silicon and 24-EBL maintained Gly I and Gly II activities

Cadmium stress alone enhanced Gly I activity by 54.41%, relative to the control. The Cd + EBL, Cd + Si, and Cd + EBL + Si treatments further increased this activity by 25.71%, 26.66%, and 32.38%, respectively, relative to Cd alone (Fig. 7a).
Fig. 7
Fig. 7

Effect of 24-epibrassinolide and silicon individually and in combination on (a) Gly I and (b) Gly II in Pisum sativum seedlings under Cd stress. Data presented are the means ± SE (n = 5). Different letters indicate significant difference at P ≤ 0.05

TheCd-alone treatment reduced Gly II activity by 32.46%, relative to the control. The Cd + EBL, Cd + Si, and Cd + EBL + Si treatments enhanced this activity by 17.30%, 21.15%, and 32.69%, respectively, relative to Cd alone (Fig. 7b).

Silicon and 24-EBL reduced Cd accumulation

Cadmium accumulated in different plant parts in the following order: roots > shoots> leaves. EBL supplementation to Cd-stressed seedlings decreased Cd accumulation in the roots, shoots, and leaves by 38.69%, 28.47%, and 48.56%, and similar values were observed after Si supplementation. The combined Cd+EBL+Si treatment further reduced Cd accumulation by 60.15% in roots, 48.63% in shoots, and 68.42% in leaves, relative to Cd alone (Table 2).
Table 2

Effect of 24-epibrassinolide and silicon individually and in combination on accumulation of Cd in root, shoot and leaf in Pisum sativum seedlings under Cd stress

Treatments

Root Cd (μg g-1 FW)

Shoot Cd (μg g-1 FW)

Leaf Cd (μg g-1 FW)

C

ND

ND

ND

C+EBL

ND

ND

ND

C+Si

ND

ND

ND

C+EBL+Si

ND

ND

ND

Cd

29.64±0.28a

10.22±0.13a

4.18±0.03a

Cd+EBL

18.17±0.20b

7.31±0.07b

2.15±0.005b

Cd+Si

17.55±0.18b

7.37±0.07b

2.08±0.005b

Cd+EBL+Si

11.81±0.12c

5.25±0.04c

1.32±0.001c

Data presented are the means ± SE (n = 5). Different letters next to the number indicate significant difference at P ≤ 0.05

Silicon and 24-EBL enhanced mineral uptake

The Cd-alone treatment impaired mineral uptake in the shoots and roots (Table 3). In the shoots, cadmium reduced S, Mg, Ca, P, and K contents by 34.69%, 58.33%, 43.47%, 48.62%, and 57.55%, respectively, relative to the control. Supplementation with EBL or Si to Cd-treated plants resulted in smallerreductions in the above macronutrients; however, the combined Cd + EBL+Si treatment enhanced S uptake by 41.76%, Mg by 114.28%, Ca by 56.92%, K by 47.88%, and P by 64.47%, relative to their respective levels with Cd alone. In the roots, the Cd-alone treatment reduced S, Mg, Ca, K, and P contents by 48.36%, 40.85%, 42.78%, 51.64%, and 51.00%, respectively, relative to the control. Supplementation with EBL or Si to Cd-treated plants enhanced the uptake of these elements, but the combined Cd+EBL+Si treatment was more effective, enhancing S uptake by 56.08%, Mg by 37.47%, Ca by 67.82%, K by 94.97%, and P by 56.12%, relative to Cdalone (Table 3).
Table 3

Effect of 24-epibrassinolide and silicon individually and in combination on macronutrients (S, Mg, Ca, K and P) in shoot and root in Pisum sativum seedlings under Cd stress

Treatments(μg g-1 DW)

Shoot S

Shoot Mg

Shoot Ca

Shoot K

Shoot P

Root S

Root Mg

Root Ca

Root K

Root P

C

95.26±0.905c

252±0.95c

115±0.45c

691±2.885c

450±3.72d

366±0.942d

776±1.26d

201±0.762c

1152±2.43d

200±0.945c

C+EBL

99.05±0.985b

262±0.976b

122±0.458b

705±2.96b

498±3.91c

385±0.987b

791±0.302b

211±0.77b

1240±2.59b

225±0.995b

C+Si

99.56±0.995b

259±0.966b

120±0.654b

702±1.95b

508±4.06b

376±0.955c

788±0.586c

200±0.752c

1215±2.51c

224±0.992b

C+EBL+Si

115±1.135a

267±0.99a

129±0.47a

725±3.085a

525±4.32a

396±1.0675a

820±1.422a

225±0.788a

1320±2.63a

231±1.037a

Cd

62.21±0.69g

105±0.422g

65±0.308g

355±1.445g

259±2.25h

189±0.5975h

459±0.73h

115±0.438g

557±1.262h

98±0.502f

Cd+EBL

76.49±0.575e

189±0.662e

89±0.376e

466±1.905e

347±3.37g

266±0.7375f

587±1.146f

182±0.59e

889±1.792f

138±0.592e

Cd+Si

73.54±0.545f

173±0.636f

83±0.35f

452±1.88f

369±3.48f

259±0.7175g

523±1.042g

174±0.542f

823±1.754g

139±0.612e

Cd+EBL+Si

88.19±0.86d

225±0.844d

102±0.412d

525±2.11d

426±3.27e

295±0.78e

631±1.216e

193±0.62d

1086±2.274e

153±0.657d

Data presented are the means ± SE (n = 5). Different letters next to the number indicate significant difference at P ≤ 0.05

The Cd-alone treatment reduced the uptake of micronutrients in the shoots and roots (Table 4). In the shoots, Cd alone reduced B, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn by 45.00%, 28.48%, 27.05%, 56.07%, and 37.58%, respectively, relative to thecontrol. Supplementation with EBL or Si, individually or in combination, enhanced the uptake of these micronutrients into shoots. In the roots, Cd alone reduced B, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn by 43.64%, 31.39%, 34.52%, 40.07%, and 41.32%, respectively, relative to the control. The Cd + EBL+Si treatment was more effectiveat enhancing micronutrient uptake than the individual treatments, with increases of 64.54% in B, 35.68% in Cu, 36.88% in Fe, 39.37% in Mn, and 53.28% in Zn, relative to Cd alone.
Table 4

Effect of 24-epibrassinolide and silicon individually and in combination on micronutrients (B, Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn) in shoot and root in Pisum sativum seedlings under Cd stress

Treatments (μg g-1 DW)

Shoot B

Shoot Cu

Shoot Fe

Shoot Mn

Shoot Zn

Root B

Root Cu

Root Fe

Root Mn

Root Zn

C

40.31±0.312b

31.35±0.582b

170±0.622b

30.21±0.695c

39.27±0.298b

28.78±0.262b

68.67±0.514b

530±3.34b

98.7±0.95c

46.15±0.426d

C+EBL

41.11±0.316b

32.27±0.286b

175±0.632b

37.25±0.75b

40.52±0.304a

30.21±0.276a

72.36±0.52a

540±5.34b

105±0.98b

48.22±0.442c

C+Si

41.52±0.322b

33.07±0.288b

175±0.632b

35.11±0.74b

41.12±0.306a

30.88±0.282a

72.91±0.524a

546±1.35b

104±0.98b

50.81±0.464b

C+EBL+Si

43.46±0.332a

35.71±0.302a

194±0.662

42.39±0.805a

43.07±0.312a

30.95±0.284a

74.25±0.534a

555±1.37a

115±1.02a

53.15±0.494a

Cd

22.17±0.232e

22.42±0.204e

124±0.438e

13.27±0.49f

24.51±0.244e

16.22±0.17e

47.11±0.424e

347±1.03e

59.15±0.79f

27.08±0.244g

Cd+EBL

26.53±0.942d

25.77±0.256d

152±0.576d

24.29±0.62e

29.55±0.656d

19.35±0.202d

55.32±0.466d

398±3.14d

78.62±2.85e

36.91±0.35f

Cd+Si

29.11±0.448d

25.91±0.26d

153±0.574d

22.77±0.595e

31.47±0.468d

20.16±0.222d

57.08±0.47d

403±3.12d

71.25±1.83e

37.61±0.354f

Cd+EBL+Si

33.42±0.278c

28.51±0.27c

165±0.596c

27.03±0.665d

35.26±0.282c

26.69±0.24c

63.92±0.484c

475±2.2c

82.44±0.88d

41.51±0.39e

Data presented are the means ± SE (n = 5). Different letters next to the number indicate significant difference at P ≤ 0.05

Discussion

Silicon and 24-EBL augmented plant growth and biomass

In this study, the effect of Si and 24-EBL on the growth, physiology, and metabolic alterations in pea seedlings with and without Cd stresswas investigated by evaluating growth, chl content, photosynthetic efficiency, osmolyte accumulation, antioxidant enzymatic responses, and mineral nutrient contents. Numerous studies have shown that Si and 24-EBL have ameliorative effects against a wide range of abiotic and biotic stresses [2, 34, 38, 39, 65]. However, at low concentration, Si can also increase plant growth and development without any apparent toxicity [66]. In our study, the growth of pea plants declined under Cd stress (Table 1). The subsequent application of Si or 24-EBL, either individually or in combination, augmented the growth attributes in Cd-stressed plants (Table 1). Stimulation of growth by Si in Cd stressed plants has been reported in cucumber [67], wheat [68], cotton [69], and peanut [43]. Similarly, 24-EBL supplementation has improved growth of Cd-stressed plants including tomato [40], radish [65], and bean [41]. Enhanced growth parameters could be due to the ability of 24-EBL to control cell elongation and division via upregulation of xyloglucan endo-transglycosylase [70, 71] or to a dilution effect of Si that decreases metal uptake or increases nutrient uptake by plants, resulting in higher photosynthetic efficiency [8]. Si application has increased both shoot and root DW in many plant species under Cd stress, including maize [72], wheat [6], and rice [73]. Co-application of 24-EBL and Si had pronounced effects on the growth and biomass of pea seedlings under Cd stress likelydue to synergistic or additive effects.

Silicon and 24-EBL restored pigment content and photosynthetic efficiency

In this study, Cd-stressed pea seedlings had lower chlorophyll and carotenoid contents (Table 2). Reductions in chlorophyll and carotenoid synthesis in response to Cd stress may be due to the inhibitory effect of Cd on the enzymes associated with pigment biosynthesis [74]. Deleterious effects of Cd stress have been reported in maize:Cd reduced chlorophyll synthesis [75], the photochemical quantum yield of photosystem II (ΦPSII), and the CO2fixation rate [76]. Si application enhanced the chlorophyll pigment and carotenoidcontents of pea seedlings (Table 2). Exogenous application of Si has had positive effects on chlorophyll biosynthesis and photosynthetic machinery in Cd-stressed maize [77], wheat [23], and pea [8]. Wu, et al. [78] reported that Si supplementation reduced Cd translocation in cucumber roots, thereby decreasing the interference of Cd complexation with photosynthetic machinery. Sa [79] found that photosynthetic pigments were restoredfollowing exogenous application of Si in cotton seedlings. Stimulatory effects of Si on photosynthetic processes could be dueto impaired heavy metal uptake, which would facilitate PSI and PSII activation [80]. Si ameliorates the decline in chlorophyll fluorescence by inhibiting Cd uptake as Si induces modifications in Cd binding properties of cell wall [81]. Exogenous application of 500mg SiO2to Cd-stressed Allium sativum L. seedlings increased the quantum efficiency [82]. Similarly, exogenous application of EBL to Cd-stressed Raphanus sativus enhanced growth byimproving the photosynthetic pigment concentration [83]. Foliar application of 24-EBL ameliorated the damage to chlorophyll and carotenoid contents, which supportsthe findings of studies in Brassica juncea L. [84] and Raphanus sativus L. [85]. Exogenous application of 24-EBL enhanced photosynthetic pigments andcarotenoidcontent due to its stimulatory effect on ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase activity [86]. EBL has improved photosynthesis by increasing the activity of Calvin cycle enzymes Co-application of EBL+Si to pea seedlings augmented chlorophyll content and carotenoid concentration, probably by modulating mineral uptake, particularly magnesium, which forms an integral part of chlorophyll molecules. Photochemical quenching (qP) and quantum yield of PSII were highest in pea seedlings treated with Si + EBL, suggesting a cumulative stimulatory effect on photosynthetic efficiency with Si improving nutrient uptake and 24-EBL reducing the photo-damage caused by the increase in carotenoid concentration.

Silicon and 24-EBL modulated physiological status and osmolyte accumulation

Cd-stressed pea seedlings had reduced physiological activities including photosynthetic rate, CO2 assimilation rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate (Table 3). Physiological activity decreases with a reduction in enzymatic activity in the Calvin cycle and impaired electron transfer across the electron transport chain [16, 32]. Further, a significant reduction in stomatal conductance and relative water content was noted with Cd stress. Supplementation with Si or 24-EBL enhanced the physiological activities and relative water contentsin the Cd-stressed pea seedlings (Table 3). Si enhanced the activity of gas exchange characteristics, including net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and water use efficiency, under Cd stress in cotton, rice, and cucumber [67, 87]. Cadmium stress increased the photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll fluorescence in barley and wheat [88, 89]. Si enhances Cd tolerance by increasing the instantaneous water use efficiency, carboxylation efficiency of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase, and light use efficiency [80]. The stimulatory effect of Si on photosynthetic machinery might be due to reduced Cd translocation by plants with less damage to photosynthetic machinery [77]. EBL significantly enhances the photosynthetic rate in Cd-stressed tomato plants by modulating photosynthetic efficiency [90]. Co-application of 24 EBL and Si improvedthe photosynthetic rate, CO2 assimilation rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate in Cd-stressed pea seedlings, thereby confirming their stimulatory effects. Relative water content increased with the combined Si and 24-EBL treatment in both control and Cd-stressed pea seedlings. Enhanced relative water content was also observed in Cd-stressed Phaseolus vulgaris treated with 24-EBL [41] and was attributed to its inhibitory effect on ABA levels, which might be correlated with the normalization of water relations [91]. Si application increases the relative water content by modulating water use efficiency and stomatal conductance in plants under heavy metal stress [89]. The co-application of Si + EBL modulated physiological processes by up-regulating enzymes associated with metabolic processes in the present study.

Increased proline and GB accumulation is the main plantresponse for maintaining tissue water potential to protect major cell metabolism and functions [92, 93]. In Cd-stressed pea seedlings, proline and GB levels increased significantly when supplemented with Si, EBL,or both. In pea seedlings treated with both Si + EBL, proline accumulated more than GB, which was also observed in drought-stressed sorghum after Si supplementation owing to the activationof the aquaporin gene and transcription factors, thereby facilitating water uptake [94, 95]. Supplementation with 24-EBL increased proline accumulation in aluminum-stressed mung bean seedlings [96], copper-stressed mustard seedlings [86], and cold-stressed peach trees [97]. Gao and coworkers indicated that increased proline levels with EBL supplementation in peach fruit were caused by changes in the P5CS enzyme (D1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate), which activated the proline synthesis pathway, and suppressed proline dehydrogenase activity leading to a reduction in proline consumption. Co-application of Si + EBL enhanced osmolyte accumulation in Cd-stressed plants due to thelikely interactive effect on the upregulation of proline biosynthetic genes [96] and activation of transcription factors related to water relations [94].

Silicon and 24-EBL reduced hydrogen peroxide MDA contents, and electrolyte leakage and methyl glyoxalase

Our data revealed a significant increase in the generation of H2O2, MDA, and the rate of electrolyte leakage in Cd-stressed pea seedlings, relative to the control (Table 4). This may be due to Cd-induced free radical generation, which would alter membrane stability, increasing its permeability [16]. Higher ROS generation in response to Cd stress has been reported[1, 1618, 92]. Enhanced production of H2O2 might be due to lower RWC, which would impair its distribution from generation sites [98]. In this study, supplementation with EBL and Si, either individually or combined, reduced H2O2 generation. Si reduced MDA contents, H2O2 levels, and the electrolytic leakage rates in shoots and roots of Cd-stressed Pisum sativum [8], rice [81] and maize [73]. Application of Si reduces free radical generation by maintaining the normalized pool of osmolytes and water content within cells, as observed in Cd-stressed peas [8]. This study confirmed that Si enhances the restoration of damage induced by Cd and improves membrane stability, as reported in Cd-stressed maize [99], cotton [79], cucumber [67], and pea [8]. Application of EBL to Cd-stressed chickpea seedlings reducedthe production of H2O2, lowered lipid peroxidation, and enhanced membrane stability by lowering the overall ROS generation to protect photosynthetic machinery[90]. One important reason for the reduction in lipid peroxidation and ROS production by EBL might be enhanced endogenous levels of growth hormones such as ethylene and salicylic acid that cross-talk and provide tolerance against metal stress [100]. Co-application of Si+EBL modulated lipid peroxidation, reduced MDA content, and improved membrane stability more effectively than the individual treatments in Cd-stressed pea plants by increasing ROS scavenging activity.

Silicon and 24-EBL modulated antioxidant activity

Oxidative stress is the main response of plants to varied abiotic and biotic stresses, including heavy metal stress [8, 80, 101103]. The antioxidant system is the key protagonist in the amelioration of oxidative stress induced by ROS [16, 104]. We evaluated the effect of Si and EBL on the main antioxidants/antioxidant enzymes, including MDHAR, DHAR, AsA, GSH, GSSG, and GST, and enzyme activities (SOD, CAT, APX, and GR) in Cd-stressed seedlings to determine their contribution to oxidative stress management (Table 5). Supplementation with either EBL or Si and the enhancement of Cd-induced antioxidant enzymes was thecrucialstrategy to improve seedling growth under Cdstress. Supplementation with Si enhanced the contents of antioxidants and antioxidant enzymes, in particular, Si significantly modulated CAT activity. Increases in CAT activity can be explained by the inhibition of Cd translocation from the roots to shoots in peas, which is regulated by Fe transport under Si supplementation [8]; this isbecause CAT is a heme-containing antioxidant enzyme that is dependent on the available iron pool of plants [105]. Increases in antioxidants and antioxidant enzymes in response to Cd+Si stress has been observed in numerous plants including pakchoi[106], peanut [107], maize [99], cotton [87], wheat [23], and pea [8]. SOD and GR activities increased in response to Si application, suggesting an improved efficiency in the conversion of O2–H2O2[25]. Si not only facilitates the activation of antioxidant enzymes but also maintains the pool of non-enzymatic antioxidants such as MDHAR, DHAR, AsA, GSH, GSSG, and GST. Wu, et al. [108] also showed that Si-mediated increases in antioxidant enzyme activities might be an adaptive strategy to augment Cd stress in tomato. Increases in the antioxidant pool can be attributed to significant changes in sulfur-containing aminoacids such as cysteine and methionine in response to Si supplementation [8]. Increases in such aminoacids can be directly correlated with the higher pool of GSH in pea seedlings supplemented with Si [8]. Several studies have shown that Si-mediated increases in non-enzymatic antioxidants alleviate Cd stress in various plants such as pakchoi [106] and pea [8]. Supllementation with EBL enhanced antioxidant enzymes as well as non-enzymatic antioxidants in Cd-stressed pea plants (Table 5). Similar findings have been reported where EBL alleviated oxidative stress in Raphanus sativa [85], Brassica juncea [86], and Cicer arietinum[16] under heavy metal stress. EBL-induced enzymatic activities are attributed to the activation of genes implicated in the gene expression of SOD, APX, and CAT activities [31]. Another possible reason for the activation of enzymatic activity might be the BR signaling kinase (BSK 1), which promotes salicylic acid levels that consequently ameliorate the effects of oxidative damage [109]. Increases in GR and GST activities in response to EBL supplementation can be explained by an increment in the GSH pool and significant decline in NADPH oxidase activity, which leads to the alleviation of heavy metal-induced toxicity [84]. In addition to EBL-induced increases in the GSH pool, EBL enhances other antioxidants such as AsA, MDHAR, and DHAR, as reported in pakchoi [110], Brassica juncea [86], Ficus concinna [111], and Solanum lycopersicum [39]. Co-application of EBL+Si might up-regulate biosynthetic genes associated with the activation of enzymatic and non-enzymatic oxidants of the Asc–GSH cycle.

24-EBL maintained Gly I and Gly II activities

One of the key strategies of plants under heavy metal stress is to accumulate MG [112114]. In this study, higher accumulation of MG was an indicator of stress in pea seedlings (Table 6). Higher concentrations of MG lead to the depletion of GSH due to the conversion to hydroxyacylglutathione [115]. Higher levels of MG might be toxic or could result in the depletion of GSH. Supplementation of pea seedlings with Si and EBL individually or in combination resulted in higher accumulation of Gly I and GlyII, which protect plants against Cd stress-induced MG accumulation [116]. Higher MG levels were also noted in mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) and rice (Oryza sativa L.) in response to Cd and Cu stresses, respectively, relative to the controls[19, 117]. Transgenic plants showed over-expression of GlyI and Gly II, which caused higher influx of MG levels against heavy metal stress via GSH detoxification, consequently reducing lipid peroxidation [118]. In this study, Gly I and Gly II activities increased in response to Cd stress. Similarly, enhanced Gly I activity with Cd and Zn toxicity has been reported in various plant species [112, 115, 119, 120]. A decline in Gly II in response to Cd stress might be due to the proteolytic degradation of enzymes. Supplementation of EBL in Ficus concinna maintainedthe pool of Gly I and Gly II against high temperature stress [111]. Application of Si increases Ca uptake, which enhances Gly I and Gly II, and contributes to the decline in Cd-induced growth inhibition [8, 20]. Co-application of Si and EBL increases the uptake of minerals such as Ca and endogenous levels of hormones that are directly implicated in the maintenance of the glyoxalase pool and MG detoxification against Cd stress. Detoxification of MG via glyoxalase is inadequate to combat Cd stress and activate a tolerance strategy. Si and EBL alleviate Cd-induced oxidative stress by maintaining Gly I and Gly II activities, indicating that both facilitate GSH restoration and glutathione redox potential via the glyoxalase system.

Silicon and 24-EBL reduced Cd accumulation

Due to its higher mobility in soil and plants, Cd is easily absorbed by plant roots (Table 6). Supplementation with Si reduced Cd accumulation in the roots, shoots, and leaves of Cd-stressed pea seedlings (Table 7), which has been reported elsewhere [8, 107]. Si interferes with root uptake and Cd translocation from roots to shoots due to co-precipitation at the root surface, which decreases Cd transport from roots to xylem, and increases Ca uptake, thereby reducing Cd uptake due to competition [8]. The co-precipitation of Cd and Si in cell walls restricts Cd translocation from shoots to grain, which alleviates Cd toxicity and grain contamination. Rahman, et al. [8] revealed that Si supplementation coincides with an increased inflow of S-containing compounds (cysteine, methionine, and glutathione) that contribute to phytochelatin (PC) synthesis in plant tissues. Phytochelatin can function as a second-line defense against Cd stress. Moreover, Si forms silicates within the cytoplasm, leading to the inhibition of symplastic transport of heavy metals [121, 122]. Si application can improve Cd toxicity by increasing plant tolerance to Cd stress. EBL reduced Cd accumulation in roots, shoots, and leaves of pea seedlings (Table 5). Supplementation with EBL reduced Cd accumulation by increasing Ca absorption and maintaining ionic homeostasis [43, 91]. Further, 24-EBL enhances the uptake of K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ in the roots, and these cations are preferentially transported to younger leaves through vascular tissues to reduce Cd translocation [17]. Moreover, 24-EBL enhances the absorption of essential inorganic ions, reducesthe uptake of toxic ions, and promotes ion homeostasis, especially K+/Na+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ in the upper leaves, Ca2+/Na+and Mg2+/Na+ in the roots, and K+/Na+ in the petioles [2, 123]. Hence, the co-application of Si+EBL reduced Cd accumulation by maintaining ion homeostasis, offering better conditions for osmotic adjustment, and blocked Cd uptake by co-precipitation.

Silicon and 24-EBL enhanced mineral uptake

Mineral nutrition is crucial for plant growth and development. Our study showed that cadmium impairs mineral uptake in pea seedlings (macro, Table 8; micro, Table 9), more so in shoots than roots. Cadmium impairs mineral absorption in other species including beans [41, 124], tomato [125], and Arabidopsis thaliana [126]. In this study, Si supplementation significantly increased macro- and micronutrient levels in the shoots and roots of control and Cd-stressed pea seedlings. Si supplementation maintains phosphorus homeostasis by regulating the uptake and overload of phosphorus from soil [127], and improves potassium uptake by activating H-ATPase even at low concentrations [127, 128]. Abdel Latef and Tran [129] have shown increased nitrogen and calcium uptake in crops after supplementation with sodium metasilicate. Si increases the oxidizing power of roots, thereby preventing surplus uptake of iron and limiting iron toxicity [130]. Further, Si regulates iron uptake from acidic soils via the release of OH through plant roots when plantsare supplemented with Si [110]. Supplementation with Si influences the solubility of various elements such as P, K, and Ca and hinders the uptake of toxic metals such as Cd, As, and Cu in rice grains [131]. Si supplementation alters phosphorus precipitation along with Fe and Mn in potato plants [132]. Tripathi, et al. [133] found that Si enhanced macro- (Mg, Ca, and K) and micronutrients (Zn and Fe) in rice seedlings under chromium stress. Supplementation with EBL increased both macro- and micronutrient uptake in Cd-stressed and control pea plants. In cucumber seedlings, EBL application improves nitrogen metabolism by maintaining ion homeostasis through the excessive flow of Ca2+ and Mg2+ into shoots and roots [134]. EBL increases Fe uptake by enhancing ferric chelate reductase activity, thereby enhancing Fe (III) reduction to Fe (II) and consequently increasing Fe content in cucumber seedlings [135]. Foliar application of EBL increased H+-ATPase activity resulting in a surplus of Fe in plants. Application of EBL activates both H+-ATPase and Ca2+-ATPase in roots and leaves of Fe-deficient pea plants [136]. H+-ATPase can establish an electrochemical potential gradient to maintain ion balance in plants [137], and Ca2+functions as an intracellular messenger in coupling an extensive range of extracellular signals to explicit responses [138], thus enhancing ion uptake and translocation. Co-application of EBL+ Si augmented mineral nutrition by decreasing the uptake of toxic metals and increasing cation exchange capacity.

Conclusion

Cd stress induces numerous physiological and biochemical processes that inhibit plant growth and metabolism. These toxic effects were ameliorated in Cd-stressed pea seedlings by supplementation with Si or EBL, or a combination of the two, which was more effective. The potential mechanism for the favorable effects of Si and EBR are summarized as follows: (1) restoration of chlorophyll and physiological activities such as photosynthetic efficiency, stomatal conductance, CO2 assimilation rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate;(2) decline in Cd root-to-shoot translocation; (3) increasein antioxidant enzyme activity and generation of antioxidant molecules such as AsA and GSH; (4) higher accumulation of osmolytes such as proline and GB; (5) improved mineral uptake resulting in higher physiological activity; and (6) detoxification of MG via the glyoxalase system. The results of our study indicate that co-application of Si+ EBL is an eco-friendly way for improving the performance of plants under Cd stress. Further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanism underlying the interactive effect of Si +EBL in Cd detoxification. These findings might provide further potential for the relevance of Si and EBL in phytoremediation and Cd detoxification in crops.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for its funding (Research group No. RGP-199).

Funding

Research group, RGP-199.

Availability of data and materials

We will deposit the datasets in publicly available repositories.

Authors’ contributions

SJ, MNA and PAhmad designed and performed the experiments. SJ and PAhmad write the manuscript. LW and DE conducted the statistical analysis. PAlam wrote the discussion part of this manuscript. KBS helped in writing and refining the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that no conflict of interest exists.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
ICAR- Central Institute of Temperate Horticulture, Rangreth, Air Field, Srinagar, Jammu, Kashmir, India
(2)
Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia
(3)
Biology Department, College of Science and Humanities, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
(4)
The UWA Institute of Agriculture and School of Agriculture & Environment, The University of Western Australia, LB 5005, Perth, WA, 6001, Australia
(5)
Department of Botany, S.P. College, Srinagar, Jammu, Kashmir, 190001, India

References

  1. Ahmad P, Abd Allah EF, Hashem A, Sarwat M, Gucel S. Exogenous application of selenium mitigates cadmium toxicity in Brassica juncea L. (Czern & Cross) by up-regulating antioxidative system and secondary metabolites. J Plant Growth Regul. 2016;35:936–50.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmad P, Ahanger MA, Egamberdieva D, Alam P, Alyemeni MN, Ashraf M. Modification of osmolytes and antioxidant enzymes by 24-epibrassinolide in chickpea Seedlings under mercury (Hg) toxicity. J Plant Growth Regul. 2018;37:309–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Yousaf B, Amina LG, Wang R, Imtiaz M, Rizwan MS, Zia-ur-Rehman M, Qadir A, Si Y. The importance of evaluating metal exposure and predicting human health risks in urban–periurban environments influenced by emerging industry. Chemosphere. 2016;150:79–89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Jan S, Parray JA. Approaches to heavy metal tolerance in plants. New Delhi, India: Springer; 2016.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Chaney RL. How Does contamination of rice soils with Cd and Zn cause high incidence of human Cd disease in subsistence rice farmers. Curr Pollut Rep. 2015;1:13–22.Google Scholar
  6. Rizwan M, Ali S, Abbas T, Zia-ur-Rehman M, Hannan F, Keller C, Al-Wabel MI, Ok YS. Cadmium minimization in wheat: A critical review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2016;130:43–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. O’Mara K, Cresswell T. Trophic variations in uptake and assimilation of cadmium, manganese and zinc: An estuarine food-chain radiotracer experiment. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. Intern J Environ Ecol Engineer. 2018;5(1).Google Scholar
  8. Rahman MF, Ghosal A, Alam MF, Kabir AH. Remediation of cadmium toxicity in field peas ( Pisum sativum L.) through exogenous silicon. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2017;135:165–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. He S, Yang X, He Z, Baligar VC. Morphological and physiological responses of plants to cadmium toxicity: A review. Pedosphere. 2017;27:421–38.Google Scholar
  10. Baldantoni D, Morra L, Zaccardelli M, Alfani A. Cadmium accumulation in leaves of leafy vegetables. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2016;123:89–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kumar V, Sah SK, Khare T, Shriram V, Wani SH. Engineering phytohormones for abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. In: Ahammed GJ, Yu JQ editors. Plant hormones under challenging environmental factors. Springer Netherlands; 2016. p. 247–66.Google Scholar
  12. Mombo S, Foucault Y, Deola F, Gaillard I, Goix S, Shahid M, Schreck E, Pierart A, Dumat C. Management of human health risk in the context of kitchen gardens polluted by lead and cadmium near a lead recycling company. J Soils Sediment. 2015;16:1214–24.Google Scholar
  13. Jin C, Nan Z, Wang H, Li X, Zhou J, Yao X. Jin P :Effect of Cd stress on the bioavailability of Cd and other mineral nutrition elements in broad bean grown in a loess subsoil amended with municipal sludge compost. Environ Sci Poll Res. 2018;25(8):7418–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Mitra S, Pramanik K, Sarkar A, Ghosh PK, Soren T, Maiti TK. Bioaccumulation of cadmium by Enterobacter sp. and enhancement of rice seedling growth under cadmium stress. Ecotox Environ Saf. 2018;156:183–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Finger-Teixeira A, MdL LF, Ricardo Soares A, da Silva D, Ferrarese-Filho O. Cadmium-induced lignification restricts soybean root growth. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2010;73:1959–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ahmad P, Abdel Latef AA, Abd_Allah EF, Hashem A, Sarwat M, Anjum NA, Gucel S. Calcium and potassium supplementation enhanced growth, osmolyte secondary metabolite production, and enzymatic antioxidant machinery in cadmium-exposed chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Frontiers Plant Sci. 2016;7:513.Google Scholar
  17. Ahmad P, Ahanger MA, Alyemeni MN, Wijaya L, Alam P. Exogenous application of nitric oxide modulates osmolyte metabolism, antioxidants, enzymes of ascorbate-glutathione cycle and promotes growth under cadmium stress in tomato. Protoplasma. 2018;255(1):79–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ahmad P, Alyemeni MN, Wijaya L, Alam P, Ahanger MA, Alamri SA. Jasmonic acid alleviates negative impacts of cadmium stress by modifying osmolytes and antioxidants in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2017;63:1889–99.Google Scholar
  19. Nahar K, Hasanuzzaman M, Alam MM, Rahman A, Suzuki T, Fujita M. Polyamine and nitric oxide crosstalk: Antagonistic effects on cadmium toxicity in mung bean plants through upregulating the metal detoxification, antioxidant defense and methylglyoxal detoxification systems. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2016;126:245–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Rahman A, Mahmud JA, Hossain S, Alam K, Oku H, Fujita M. Actions of biological trace elements in plant abiotic stress tolerance. In: Naeem M, Ansari AA, GIll SS editors. Essential plant nutrients: Uptake, use efficiency, and management. Switzerland AG: Springer Nature; 2017. p. 213–74.Google Scholar
  21. Ahmad P, Ahanger MA, Egamberdieva D, Alam P, Alyemeni MN, Ashraf M. Modification of osmolytes and antioxidant enzymes by 24-epibrassinolide in chickpea seedlings under mercury (Hg) toxicity. J Plant Growth Regul. 2018;37(1):309–22.Google Scholar
  22. Manquián-Cerda K, Cruces E, Escudey M, Zúriiga G, Calderon R. Interactive effects of aluminum and cadmium on phenolic compounds, antioxidant enzyme activity and oxidative stress in blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) plantlets cultivated in vitro. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018;150:320–6.Google Scholar
  23. Hasanuzzaman M, Hossain MA, Fujita M. Nitric oxide modulates antioxidant defense and the methylglyoxal detoxification system and reduces salinity-induced damage of wheat seedlings. Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2011;5:353–65.Google Scholar
  24. Tang J, Han Z, Chai J. Q&A: what are brassinosteroids and how do they act in plants? BMC Biol. 2016;14:113.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang Q, Zhang L, Zou J, Liu D, Yue J. Effects of cadmium on root growth, cell division and micronuclei formation in root tip cells of Allium cepa var. agrogarum L. ΦYTON. 2014;83:291–8.Google Scholar
  26. Sun H, Dai H, Wang X, Wang G. Physiological and proteomic analysis of selenium-mediated tolerance to Cd stress in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2016;133:114–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ahmad P, Abdel Latef AA, Hashem A, Abd_Allah EF, Gucel S, Tran L-SP. Nitric oxide mitigates salt stress by regulating levels of osmolytes and antioxidant enzymes in chickpea. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:347.Google Scholar
  28. Sirhindi G, Mir MA, Abd-Allah EF, Ahmad P, Gucel S. Jasmonic acid modulates the physio-biochemical attributes, antioxidant enzyme activity, and gene expression in Glycine max under nickel toxicity. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2016;7:591.Google Scholar
  29. Sharma P, Kumar A, Bhardwaj R. Plant steroidal hormone epibrassinolide regulate – Heavy metal stress tolerance in Oryza sativa L. by modulating antioxidant defense expression. Environ Exp Bot. 2016;122:1–9.Google Scholar
  30. Kohli SK, Handa N, Gautam V, Bali S, Sharma A, Khanna K, Arora S, Thukral AK, Ohri P, Karpets YV, et al. ROS signaling in plants under heavy metal stress. In: Khan MIR, Khan NA, editors. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant systems in plants: Role and regulation under abiotic stress. Singapore: Springer; 2017. p. 185–214.Google Scholar
  31. Kohli SK, Handa N, Sharma A, Gautam V, Arora S, Bhardwaj R, Alyemeni MN, Wijaya L, Ahmad P. Combined effect of 24-epibrassinolide and salicylic acid mitigates lead (Pb) toxicity by modulating various metabolites in Brassica juncea L. seedlings. Protoplasma. 2018;255(1):11-24.Google Scholar
  32. Kaur R, Yadav P, Thukral AK, Sharma A, Bhardwaj R, Alyemeni MN, Wijaya L, Ahmad P. Castasterone and Citric Acid Supplementation Alleviates Cadmium Toxicity by Modifying Antioxidants and Organic Acids in Brassica juncea. J Plant Growth Regul. 2018;37:286–99.Google Scholar
  33. Balakhnina TI, Matichenkov VV, Wlodarczyk T, Borkowska A, Nosalewicz M, Fomina IR. Effects of silicon on growth processes and adaptive potential of barley plants under optimal soil watering and flooding. Plant Growth Regulation. 2012;67:35–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Farooq MA, Dietz K-J. Silicon as versatile player in plant and human biology: Overlooked and poorly understood. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2015;6.Google Scholar
  35. Bhatt D, Sharma G. Role of silicon in counteracting abiotic and biotic plant stresses. IJCS. 2018;6(2):1434–42.Google Scholar
  36. Cooper JW, Hu Y, Beyyoudh L, Yildiz Dasgan H, Kunert K, Beveridge CA, Foyer CH. Strigolactones positively regulate chilling tolerance in pea and in Arabidopsis. Plant, cell & Environ. 2018;41(6):1298–310.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Ahmad F, Singh A, Kamal A. Crosstalk of brassinosteroids with other phytohormones under various abiotic stresses. J Appl Biology & Biotech. 2018;6(1):56–62.Google Scholar
  38. Shahzad B, Tanveer M, Che Z, Rehman A, Cheema SA, Sharma A, Zhaorong D. Role of 24-epibrassinolide (EBL) in mediating heavy metal and pesticide induced oxidative stress in plants: A review. Ecotox Environ Saf. 2018;147:935–44.Google Scholar
  39. Soares C, de Sousa A, Pinto A, Azenha M, Teixeira J, Azevedo RA, Fidalgo F. Effect of 24-epibrassinolide on ROS content, antioxidant system, lipid peroxidation and Ni uptake in Solanum nigrum L. under Ni stress. Environ Exp Bot. 2016;122:115–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Hayat S, Hasan SA, Yusuf M, Hayat Q, Ahmad A. Effect of 28-homobrassinolide on photosynthesis, fluorescence and antioxidant system in the presence or absence of salinity and temperature in Vigna radiata. Environ Exp Bot. 2010;69:105–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Santos LR, Batista BL, Lobato AKS. Brassinosteroids mitigate cadmium toxicity in cowpea plants. Photosynthetica. 2018;56(2):591–605.Google Scholar
  42. Bukhari SAH, Wang R, Wang W, Ahmed IM, Zheng W, Cao F. Genotype-dependent effect of exogenous 24-epibrassinolide on chromium-induced changes inultrastructure and physicochemical traits in tobacco seedlings. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016;23:18229–38.Google Scholar
  43. Dong Y, W-f C, Bai X, Liu F, Wan Y. Effects of Exogenous Nitric Oxide and 24-Epibrassinolide on Physiological Characteristics of Peanut under Cadmium Stress. Pedosphere. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60376-X.
  44. Clemens S, Aarts MGM, Thomine S, Verbruggen N. Plant science: the key to preventing slow cadmium poisoning. Trend Plant Sci. 2013;18:92–9.Google Scholar
  45. Hoagland DR, Arnon DI. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agricultural Experimental Station, University of California, Berkeley. Circular. 1950;347:1-32.Google Scholar
  46. Hiscox JD, Israelstam GF. A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration. Can J Bot. 1979;57:1332–4.Google Scholar
  47. Lichtenthaler HK, Wellburn AR. Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophyllsaandbof leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem Soc Trans. 1983;11:591–2.Google Scholar
  48. Genty B, Harbinson J, Briantais J-M, Baker NR. The relationship between non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence and the rate of photosystem 2 photochemistry in leaves. Photosynthesis Res. 1990;25:249–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Velikova V, Yordanov I, Edreva A. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants. Plant Sci. 2000;151:59–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Madhava Rao KV, Sresty TVS. Antioxidative parameters in the seedlings of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh) in response to Zn and Ni stresses. Plant Sci. 2000;157:113–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Dionisio-Sese ML, Tobita S. Antioxidant responses of rice seedlings to salinity stress. Plant Sci. 1998;135:1–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Wild R, Ooi L, Srikanth V, Münch G. A quick, convenient and economical method for the reliable determination of methylglyoxal in millimolar concentrations: the N-acetyl-l-cysteine assay. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012;403:2577–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Yamasaki S, Dillenburg LR. Measurements of leaf relative water content in Araucaria angustifolia. Revista Brasilleira de fisiologia vegetal. 1999;11:69–75.Google Scholar
  54. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil. 1973;39:205–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Grieve CM, Grattan SR. Rapid assay for determination of water soluble quaternary ammonium compounds. Plant Soil. 1983;70:303–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Beyer WF, Fridovich I. Assaying for superoxide dismutase activity: Some large consequences of minor changes in conditions. Anal Biochem. 1987;161:559–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Nakano Y, Asada K. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 1981;22:867–80.Google Scholar
  58. Aebi H. Catalase in vitro. Method Enzymol 105:121–6.Google Scholar
  59. Foyer CH, Halliwell B. The presence of glutathione and glutathione reductase in chloroplasts: A proposed role in ascorbic acid metabolism. Planta. 1976;133:21–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Hasanuzzaman M, Fujita M. Exogenous sodium nitroprusside alleviates arsenic-induced oxidative stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings by enhancing antioxidant defense and glyoxalase system. Ecotoxicology. 2013;22:584–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Miyake C, Asada K. Thylakoid-bound sscorbate peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts and photoreduction of its primary oxidation product monodehydroascorbate radicals in thylakoids. Plant Cell Physiol. 1992;33:541–53.Google Scholar
  62. Principato GB, Rosi G, Talesa V, Giovannini E, Norton SJ. A comparative study on glyoxalase II from vertebrata. Enzyme. 1987;37:164–8.Google Scholar
  63. Huang C, He W, Guo J, Chang X, Su P, Zhang L. Increased sensitivity to salt stress in an ascorbate-deficient Arabidopsis mutant. J Exp Bot. 2005;56:3041–9.Google Scholar
  64. Yu C-W, Murphy TM, Lin C-H. Hydrogen peroxide-induced chilling tolerance in mung beans mediated through ABA-independent glutathione accumulation. Funct Plant Biol. 2003;30:955.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Rasool S, Urwat U, Nazir M, Zargar SM, Zargar MY. Cross talk between phytohormone signaling pathways under abiotic stress conditions and their metabolic engineering for conferring abiotic stress tolerance. In: Zargar SM, Zargar MY editors. Abiotic Stress-Mediated Sensing and Signaling in Plants: An Omics Perspective. Springer; 2018. p. 329–50.Google Scholar
  66. Ullah H, Luc PD, Gautam A, Datta A. Growth, yield and silicon uptake of rice (Oryza sativa) as influenced by dose and timing of silicon application under water-deficit stress. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2017;64:1–13.Google Scholar
  67. Bu R, Xiao X, Liao W, Hu Y, Li J, Lv J, Xie J. Exogenous Si alleviation of autotoxicity in Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seed germination is correlated with changes in carbohydrate metabolism. J Plant Growth Regul. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-017-9773-8.
  68. Shi Z, Yang S, Han D, Zhou Z, Li X, Liu Y, Zhang B. Silicon alleviates cadmium toxicity in wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivum L.) by reducing cadmium ion uptake and enhancing antioxidative capacity. Environ Sci Poll Res. 2018;25(8):7638–46.Google Scholar
  69. Farooq MA, Ali S, Hameed A, Bharwana SA, Rizwan M, Ishaque W, Farid M, Mahmood K, Iqbal Z. Cadmium stress in cotton seedlings: Physiological, photosynthesis and oxidative damages alleviated by glycinebetaine. S Afr J Bot. 2016;104:61–8.Google Scholar
  70. Li Y, Song Y, Shi G, Wang J, Hou X. Response of antioxidant activity to excess copper in two cultivars of Brassica campestris ssp. chinensis Makino. Acta Physiol Plant. 2008;31:155–62.Google Scholar
  71. Saeidnejad A, Mardani H, Naghibolghora M. Protective effects of salicylic acid on physiological parameters and antioxidants response in maize seedlings under salinity stress. J Appl Environ Biol Sci. 2012;2:364–73.Google Scholar
  72. Wu J, Geilfus CM, Pitann B, Mühling KH. Silicon-enhanced oxalate exudation contributes to alleviation of cadmium toxicity in wheat. Environ Exper Bot. 2016;131:10–8.Google Scholar
  73. Srivastava RK, Pandey P, Rajpoot R, Rani A, Gautam A, Dubey RS. Exogenous application of calcium and silica alleviates cadmium toxicity by suppressing oxidative damage in rice seedlings. Protoplasma. 2014;252:959–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Muradoglu F, Gundogdu M, Ercisli S, Encu T, Balta F, Jaafar H, Zia-Ul-Haq M. Cadmium toxicity affects chlorophyll a and b content, antioxidant enzyme activities and mineral nutrient accumulation in strawberry. Biol Res. 2015;48:11.Google Scholar
  75. Paunov M, Koleva L, Vassilev A, Vangronsveld J, Goltsev V. Effects of different metals on photosynthesis: Cadmium and zinc affect chlorophyll fluorescence in Durum Wheat. Intern. J Mol. Sci. 2018;19(3):787.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. da Silva AJ, do Nascimento CWA, da Silva Gouveia-Neto A, da Silva-Jr EA. LED-induced chlorophyll fluorescence spectral analysis for the early detection and monitoring of cadmium toxicity in maize plants. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012;223:3527–33.Google Scholar
  77. Vaculík M, Pavlovič A, Lux A. Silicon alleviates cadmium toxicity by enhanced photosynthetic rate and modified bundle sheath's cell chloroplasts ultrastructure in maize. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2015;120:66–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Wu Q, Su N, Chen Q, Shen W, Shen Z, Xia Y, Cui J. Cadmium-induced hydrogen accumulation is involved in cadmium tolerance in Brassica campestris by reestablishment of reduced glutathione homeostasis. Plos One. 2015;10:e0139956.Google Scholar
  79. Bharwana SA, Ali S, Farooq MA, Iqbal N, Abbas F and Ahmad MSA. Alleviation of lead toxicity by silicon is related to elevated photosynthesis, antioxidant enzymes suppressed lead uptake and oxidative stress in cotton. J Bioremed Biodeg. 2013;4:187.Google Scholar
  80. Adrees M, Ali S, Rizwan M, Zia-ur-Rehman M, Ibrahim M, Abbas F, Farid M, Qayyum MF, Irshad MK. Mechanisms of silicon-mediated alleviation of heavy metal toxicity in plants: A review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2015;119:186–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Liu J, Ma J, He C, Li X, Zhang W, Xu F, Lin Y, Wang L. Inhibition of cadmium ion uptake in rice (Oryza sativa) cells by a wall-bound form of silicon. New Phytol. 2013;200:691–9.Google Scholar
  82. Wu H, Wang J, Ou Y, Li B, Jiang W, Liu D, Zou J. Cadmium uptake and localization in roots of Salix matsudana Koidz. Fres Environ Bullet. 2015;24(12A):4504-11.Google Scholar
  83. Ramakrishna B, Rao SSR. Foliar application of brassinosteroids alleviates adverse effects of zinc toxicity in radish (Raphanus sativus L.) plants. Protoplasma. 2014;252:665–77.Google Scholar
  84. Kanwar MK, Bhardwaj R, Chowdhary SP, Arora P, Sharma P, Kumar S. Isolation and characterization of 24-Epibrassinolide from Brassica juncea L. and its effects on growth, Ni ion uptake, antioxidant defense of Brassica plants and in vitro cytotoxicity. Acta Physiol Plant. 2012;35:1351–62.Google Scholar
  85. Choudhary SP, Kanwar M, Bhardwaj R, Yu J-Q, Tran L-SP. Chromium stress mitigation by polyamine-brassinosteroid application involves phytohormonal and physiological strategies in Raphanus sativus L. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33210.Google Scholar
  86. Siddiqui H, Hayat S, Bajguz A. Regulation of photosynthesis by brassinosteroids in plants. Acta Physiol Plant. 2018;40(3):59.Google Scholar
  87. Farooq MA, Ali S, Hameed A, Ishaque W, Mahmood K, Iqbal Z. Alleviation of cadmium toxicity by silicon is related to elevated photosynthesis, antioxidant enzymes; suppressed cadmium uptake and oxidative stress in cotton. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2013;96:242–9.Google Scholar
  88. Ali S, Farooq MA, Yasmeen T, Hussain S, Arif MS, Abbas F, Bharwana SA, Zhang G. The influence of silicon on barley growth, photosynthesis and ultra-structure under chromium stress. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2013;89:66–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Tripathi DK, Singh VP, Prasad SM, Chauhan DK, Kishore Dubey N, Rai AK. Silicon-mediated alleviation of Cr(VI) toxicity in wheat seedlings as evidenced by chlorophyll florescence, laser induced breakdown spectroscopy and anatomical changes. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2015;113:133–44.Google Scholar
  90. Hayat S, Hasan SA, Ahmad A. Growth, nitrate reductase activity and antioxidant system in cadmium stressed tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) cultivars/Croissance, activité de la nitrate réductase et du système antioxydant chez les cultivars de tomate (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) soumis à un stress au cadmium. Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement. 2011;15:401.Google Scholar
  91. Wani AS, Tahir I, Ahmad SS, Dar RA, Nisar S. Efficacy of 24-epibrassinolide in improving the nitrogen metabolism and antioxidant system in chickpea cultivars under cadmium and/or NaCl stress. Sci Horticul. 2017;225:48–55.Google Scholar
  92. Ahmad P, Sarwat M, Bhat NA, Wani MR, Kazi AG, Tran L-SP. Alleviation of cadmium toxicity in Brassica juncea L. (Czern. & Coss.) by calcium application involves various physiological and biochemical strategies. Plos One. 2015;10:e0114571.Google Scholar
  93. Ahanger MA, Agarwal RM, Tomar NS, Shrivastava M. Potassium induces positive changes in nitrogen metabolism and antioxidant system of oat (Avena sativa L cultivar Kent). J Plant Interact. 2015;10:211–23.Google Scholar
  94. Liu J, Gao H, Wang X, Zheng Q, Wang C, Wang X, Wang Q. Effects of 24-epibrassinolide on plant growth, osmotic regulation and ion homeostasis of salt-stressed canola. Plant Biol. 2013;16:440–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Khattab HI, Emam MA, Emam MM, Helal NM, Mohamed MR. Effect of selenium and silicon on transcription factors NAC5 and DREB2A involved in drought-responsive gene expression in rice. Biol Plant. 2014;58:265–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Ali B, Hasan SA, Hayat S, Hayat Q, Yadav S, Fariduddin Q, Ahmad A. A role for brassinosteroids in the amelioration of aluminium stress through antioxidant system in mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Environ Exp Bot. 2008;62:153–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Gao H, Zhang Z, Lv X, Cheng N, Peng B, Cao W. Effect of 24-epibrassinolide on chilling injury of peach fruit in relation to phenolic and proline metabolisms. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2016;111:390–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Weisany W, Sohrabi Y, Heidari G, Siosemardeh A, Ghassemi-Golezani K. Physiological responses of soybean ('Glycine max'L.) To zinc application under salinity stress. Aust J Crop Sci. 2011;5:1441.Google Scholar
  99. Lukačová Z, Švubová R, Kohanová J, Lux A. Silicon mitigates the Cd toxicity in maize in relation to cadmium translocation, cell distribution, antioxidant enzymes stimulation and enhanced endodermal apoplasmic barrier development. Plant Growth Regul. 2013;70:89–103.Google Scholar
  100. Fariduddin Q, Yusuf M, Ahmad I, Ahmad A. Brassinosteroids and their role in response of plants to abiotic stresses. Biol Plant. 2013;58:9–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Ali S, Bharwana SA, Rizwan M, Farid M, Kanwal S, Ali Q, Ibrahim M, Gill RA, Khan MD. Fulvic acid mediates chromium (Cr) tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) through lowering of Cr uptake and improved antioxidant defense system. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22:10601–9.Google Scholar
  102. Ali S, Chaudhary A, Rizwan M, Anwar HT, Adrees M, Farid M, Irshad MK, Hayat T, Anjum SA. Alleviation of chromium toxicity by glycinebetaine is related to elevated antioxidant enzymes and suppressed chromium uptake and oxidative stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22:10669–78.Google Scholar
  103. Jan S, Parray JA. Approaches to heavy metal tolerance in plants. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2016.Google Scholar
  104. Schieber M, Chandel Navdeep S. ROS Function in Redox Signaling and Oxidative Stress. Curr Biol. 2014;24:R453–62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  105. Jan S, Parween T, Siddiqi TO, Mahmooduzzafar. Anti-oxidant modulation in response to gamma radiation induced oxidative stress in developing seedlings of Psoralea corylifolia L. J Environ Radioact. 2012;113:142–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Song A, Li Z, Zhang J, Xue G, Fan F, Liang Y. Silicon-enhanced resistance to cadmium toxicity in Brassica chinensis L. is attributed to Si-suppressed cadmium uptake and transport and Si-enhanced antioxidant defense capacity. J Hazard Mater. 2009;172:74–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Shi G, Cai Q, Liu C, Wu L. Silicon alleviates cadmium toxicity in peanut plants in relation to cadmium distribution and stimulation of antioxidative enzymes. Plant Growth Regul. 2010;61:45–52.Google Scholar
  108. Wu J, Guo J, Hu Y, Gong H. Distinct physiological responses of tomato and cucumber plants in silicon-mediated alleviation of cadmium stress. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:453.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  109. Deng X-G, Zhu T, Peng X-J, Xi D-H, Guo H, Yin Y, Zhang D-W, Lin H-H. Role of brassinosteroid signaling in modulating tobacco mosaic virus resistance in Nicotiana benthamiana. Sci Rep. 2016;6:20579.Google Scholar
  110. Wang X, Shi Y, Chen X, Huang B. Screening of Cd-safe genotypes of Chinese cabbage in field condition and Cd accumulation in relation to organic acids in two typical genotypes under long-term Cd stress. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22:16590–9.Google Scholar
  111. Jin SH, Li XQ, Wang GG, Zhu XT: Brassinosteroids alleviate high-temperature injury in Ficus concinna seedlings via maintaining higher antioxidant defence and glyoxalase systems. AoB Plants. 2015;7:plv009-plv009.Google Scholar
  112. Hossain MA, Hossain MZ, Fujita M. Stress-induced changes of methylglyoxal level and glyoxalase I activity in pumpkin seedlings and cDNA cloning of glyoxalase I gene. Aust J Crop Sci. 2009;3:53.Google Scholar
  113. Devanathan S, Erban A, Perez-Torres R, Kopka J, Makaroff CA. Arabidopsis thaliana glyoxalase 2-1 is required during abiotic stress but is not essential under normal plant growth. Plos One. 2014;9:e95971.Google Scholar
  114. Hoque TS, Hossain MA, Mostofa MG, Burritt DJ, Fujita M, Tran L-SP. Methylglyoxal: An emerging signaling molecule in plant abiotic stress responses and tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1341.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  115. Kalapos MP, Garzó T, Antoni F, Mandl J. Accumulation of S-d-lactoylglutathione and transient decrease of glutathione level caused by methylglyoxal load in isolated hepatocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992;1135:159–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Hossain MA, Fujita M. Purification of glyoxalase I from onion bulbs and molecular cloning of its cDNA. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2009;73:2007–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Mostofa MG, Saegusa D, Fujita M, Tran L-SP. Hydrogen sulfide regulates salt tolerance in rice by maintaining Na+/K+ balance, mineral homeostasis and oxidative metabolism under excessive salt stress. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:1055.Google Scholar
  118. Upadhyaya CP, Venkatesh J, Gururani MA, Asnin L, Sharma K, Ajappala H, Park SW. Transgenic potato overproducing l-ascorbic acid resisted an increase in methylglyoxal under salinity stress via maintaining higher reduced glutathione level and glyoxalase enzyme activity. Biotechnol Lett. 2011;33:2297–307.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Hossain MA, Hasanuzzaman M, Fujita M. Up-regulation of antioxidant and glyoxalase systems by exogenous glycinebetaine and proline in mung bean confer tolerance to cadmium stress. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2010;16:259–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  120. Lin F, Xu J, Shi J, Li H, Li B. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel glyoxalase I gene TaGly I in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Mol Biol Rep. 2009;37:729–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Cao Z, Yue Y, Zhong H, Qiu P, Chen P, Wen X, Wang S, Liu G. The cationic dye removal by novel SiZn composites prepared from zinc ash. J Taiwan Institute Chem Engineer. 2017;71:464–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  122. Ji X, Liu S, Juan H, Bocharnikova EA, Matichenkov VV. Effect of silicon fertilizers on cadmium in rice (Oryza sativa) tissue at tillering stage. Environ Sci Pollu Res. 2017;24:10740–8.Google Scholar
  123. Waisi H, Petkovic A, Nikolic B, Jankovic B, Raicevic V, Lalevic B, Giba Z. Influence of 24-epibrassinolide on seedling growth and distribution of mineral elements in two maize hybrids. Chem Indus. 2017;71:201–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  124. Wael MS, Mostafa MR, Taia AAE-M, Saad MH, Magdi TA. Alleviation of cadmium toxicity in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants by the exogenous application of salicylic acid. J Horticul Sci Biotechnol. 2015;90:83–91.Google Scholar
  125. Hassan Z, Aarts MGM. Opportunities and feasibilities for biotechnological improvement of Zn, Cd or Ni tolerance and accumulation in plants. Environ Exp Bot. 2011;72:53–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  126. Yamaguchi C, Takimoto Y, Ohkama-Ohtsu N, Hokura A, Shinano T, Nakamura T, Suyama A, Maruyama-Nakashita A. Effects of cadmium treatment on the uptake and translocation of sulfate in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016;57:2353–66.Google Scholar
  127. Xu CX, Ma YP, Liu YL. Effects of silicon (Si) on growth, quality and ionic homeostasis of aloe under salt stress. S Afr J Bot. 2015;98:26–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  128. Yin L, Wang S, Tanaka K, Fujihara S, Itai A, Den X, Zhang S. Silicon-mediated changes in polyamines participate in silicon-induced salt tolerance in Sorghum bicolor L. Plant Cell Environ. 2015;39:245–58.Google Scholar
  129. Abdel Latef AA, Tran L-SP. Impacts of priming with silicon on the growth and tolerance of maize plants to alkaline stress. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:243.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  130. Ma JF, Takahashi E. Silicon in soil. In: Book Silicon in soil: Elsevier; 2002. p. 27–48.Google Scholar
  131. Malav JK, Patel K, Sajid M. Influence of silicon fertilization on yield and nutrients uptake (Si, P, K, S & Na) of rice (Oryza sativa L.). The. Ecoscan. 2015;9:629–34.Google Scholar
  132. Pilon C, Soratto RP, Moreno LA. Effects of soil and foliar application of soluble silicon on mineral nutrition, gas exchange, and growth of potato plants. Crop Sci. 2013;53:1605.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  133. Tripathi DK, Singh VP, Kumar D, Chauhan DK. Impact of exogenous silicon addition on chromium uptake, growth, mineral elements, oxidative stress, antioxidant capacity, and leaf and root structures in rice seedlings exposed to hexavalent chromium. Acta Physiol Plant. 2011;34:279–89.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  134. Yuan L, Shu S, Sun J, Guo S, Tezuka T. Effects of 24-epibrassinolide on the photosynthetic characteristics, antioxidant system, and chloroplast ultrastructure in Cucumis sativus L. under Ca(NO3)2 stress. Photosynthesis Res. 2012;112:205–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  135. Wang B, Li Y, Zhang W-H. Brassinosteroids are involved in response of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) to iron deficiency. Ann Bot. 2012;110:681–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  136. Song YL, Dong YJ, Tian XY, Kong J, Bai XY, Xu LL, He ZL. Role of foliar application of 24-epibrassinolide in response of peanut seedlings to iron deficiency. Biol Plant. 2016;60:329–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  137. Palmgren MG. PLANT PLASMA MEMBRANE H+-ATPases: Powerhouses for nutrient uptake. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 2001;52:817–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Zhang C: Integration Of Extracellular And Intracellular Signals Via The Calcium Sensing Receptor (CASR). 2014.Google Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement