Research article
Open Access

Ubiquitous miR159 repression of MYB33/65 in Arabidopsis rosettes is robust and is not perturbed by a wide range of stresses

  • Yanjiao Li1,
  • Maria Alonso-Peral1,
  • Gigi Wong1,
  • Ming-Bo Wang2 and
  • Anthony A Millar1Email author
BMC Plant BiologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:179

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-016-0867-4

©  The Author(s). 2016

Received: 15 November 2015

Accepted: 5 August 2016

Published: 19 August 2016

Abstract

Background

The microR159 (miR159) – GAMYB pathway is conserved in higher plants, where GAMYB, expression promotes programmed cell death in seeds (aleurone) and anthers (tapetum). In cereals, restriction of GAMYB expression to seeds and anthers is mainly achieved transcriptionally, whereas in Arabidopsis this is achieved post-transcriptionally, as miR159 silences GAMYB (MYB33 and MYB65) in vegetative tissues, but not in seeds and anthers. However, we cannot rule out a role for miR159-MYB33/65 pathway in Arabidopsis vegetative tissues; a loss-of-function mir159 Arabidopsis mutant displays strong pleiotropic defects and numerous reports have documented changes in miR159 abundance during stress and hormone treatments. Hence, we have investigated the functional role of this pathway in vegetative tissues.

Results

It was found that the miR159-MYB33/65 pathway was ubiquitously present throughout rosette development. However, miR159 appears to continuously repress MYB33/MYB65 expression to levels that have no major impact on rosette development. Inducible inhibition of miR159 resulted in MYB33/65 de-repression and associated phenotypic defects, indicating that a potential role in vegetative development is only possible through MYB33 and MYB65 if miR159 levels decrease. However, miR159 silencing of MYB33/65 appeared extremely robust; no tested abiotic stress resulted in strong miR159 repression. Consistent with this, the stress responses of an Arabidopsis mutant lacking the miR159-MYB33/65 pathway were indistinguishable from wild-type. Moreover, expression of viral silencing suppressors, either via transgenesis or viral infection, was unable to prevent miR159 repression of MYB33/65, highlighting the robustness of miR159-mediated silencing.

Conclusions

Despite being ubiquitously present, molecular, genetic and physiological analysis failed to find a major functional role for the miR159-MYB33/65 pathway in Arabidopsis rosette development or stress response. Although it is likely that this pathway is important for a stress not tested here or in different plant species, our findings argue against the miR159-MYB33/65 pathway playing a major conserved role in general stress response. Finally, in light of the robustness of miR159-mediated repression of MYB33/65, it appears unlikely that low fold-level changes of miR159 abundance in response to stress would have any major physiological impact in Arabidopsis.

Keywords

miR159 GAMYB-like Arabidopsis Stress Viral silencing suppressors

Background

The miR159 family represents one of the most ancient miRNA families being present in most land plants (>400 million years) [1]. Via bioinformatic prediction and experimental validation, miR159 has been found to regulate the expression of a family of GAMYB or GAMYB-like genes in a diverse range of plant species, including monocots such as barley and rice [2], dicots such as Arabidopsis [3], potato [4] and strawberry [5], and gymnosperms such as Larix [6]. Despite the considerable evolutionary distance that separates these species, the miR159 binding site in these MYB genes is conserved in both position and sequence, inferring this miR159-MYB relationship has a long co-evolutionary history. This strong conservation indicates this miR159-MYB relationship has been under strong selective pressure, presumably performing a critical function.

These GAMYB genes encode R2R3 MYB domain transcription factors that have been implicated in gibberellin (GA) signal transduction. Their role has been best characterised in anthers (tapetum) and seeds (aleurone), where a major role is to promote programmed cell death (PCD). In rice, a loss-of-function gamyb mutant is male sterile as the tapetum fails to undergo PCD and degenerate [7, 8]. Likewise in Arabidopsis, mutation of MYB33 and MYB65, the two major target genes of miR159, results in male sterility due to a tapetum that fails to degenerate [9, 10]. Supporting these observations is the overexpression of miR159 in both cereals and Arabidopsis which results in male sterility [2, 11–13], implying this GAMYB anther function has been strongly conserved. In the seed, GAMYB expression in barley or Arabidopsis promotes aleurone vacuolation, also a GA-mediated PCD process [14, 15]. Therefore, it appears that in seeds where miR159 activity is weak [2, 16], these GAMYB-like genes are expressed, promoting a conserved PCD function.

By contrast, the functional role of the miR159-MYB pathway in vegetative tissues is not as clear. A role for miR159 in development has been suggested from genetic analysis in Arabidopsis. Previously, loss-of-function mutations have been isolated for all three Arabidopsis miR159 family members, miR159a-c. None of the three single mutants displayed a phenotype, but a mir159ab double mutant displayed pleiotropic developmental defects, that included stunted growth and rounded, upwardly curled leaves [10, 17]. This was consistent with deep sequencing; miR159a and miR159b were found to be overwhelmingly the major isoforms, composing approximately 90 % and 10 % of the miR159 reads respectively in Arabidopsis [18]. By contrast, miR159c is very lowly expressed, and there are multiple lines of evidence indicating this miRNA is likely non-functional in Arabidopsis [17]. Although miR159 is predicted to regulate approximately 20 different target genes in Arabidopsis, all the mir159ab pleiotropic vegetative defects are suppressed in a mir159ab.myb33.myb65 quadruple mutant, genetically demonstrating that miR159 is functionally specific for MYB33 and MYB65 in vegetative tissues, although this does not dismiss the possibility of miR159-mediated regulation of other targets that do not result in obvious developmental defects. Nevertheless, partly explaining this specificity is that many of the other potential miR159 targets are not transcribed in vegetative tissues, but rather their transcription is restricted to anthers [17]. Together, these experiments have defined a highly active miR159-MYB33/MYB65 pathway present in Arabidopsis vegetative tissues.

Curiously, rosettes of a myb33.myb65 double mutant have no major phenotypic defects, where multiple lines of evidence suggest that miR159-mediated silencing represses the expression of these genes to low levels [15], raising the question of what functional role this pathway plays in rosettes. Although a role for MYB33 in promoting flowering has been proposed, as miR159 overexpression in the Landsberg erecta ecotype reduced MYB33 transcript levels and delayed flowering [11], no such impact was seen in the Columbia ecotype [12]. Furthermore, flowering was neither delayed in myb33.myb65 nor promoted in mir159ab indicating MYB33/MYB65 are not major players in determining flowering-time in Columbia [15]. Therefore, no clear rationale exists for this miR159-MYB33/MYB65 pathway in rosette/vegetative tissues, at least under standard growing conditions.

Interestingly, similar to many other highly conserved miRNAs, numerous studies that have quantified changes to miRNA levels have implicated miR159 in playing a response to a variety of stresses in a number of different species. This includes drought [4, 19], salinity [20], cold [21], heat [13], UV-light [22], waterlogging [23] or response to biotic stresses such as viruses [24, 25] or bacterial lipopolysaccharides [26]. Given MYB activity can impact vegetative growth its expression may adjust growth during stress [20]. However, no clear trend in miR159 abundance emerges from these stress treatments, where in some instance miR159 abundance increases with stress treatment [19, 22, 23, 26], and in others, miR159 abundance decreases [4, 13]. Whether these changes result in significant physiological responses to these stresses and whether any potential role is widely conserved is unclear. Therefore, despite the miR159-MYB being strongly conserved across many species, what functional role this pathway plays in vegetative tissues remains unknown. To address this question, we have attempted to determine in what developmental stages of the rosette development are miR159 and MYB33/65 expressed/transcribed. We then investigate under what conditions miR159 is sufficiently suppressed enabling de-repression of MYB33/65 expression, and whether this alteration in miR159 contributes to a physiological response to the stress. Such experiments will help determine what functional role the miR159-MYB pathway performs in vegetative tissues of Arabidopsis.

Results

The miR159-MYB33/65 module is ubiquitously present in Arabidopsis rosettes

To begin the characterisation of miR159-MYB pathway in Arabidopsis rosettes, two time-course experiments were performed to determine in what developmental stages and rosette tissues miR159 and MYB33/65 are expressed. Firstly, a qRT-PCR based transcript profiling was performed on a time-course of Arabidopsis rosettes grown over 60 days to determine the abundance of mature miR159a/miR159b and the mRNA levels of MYB33/MYB65 (Fig. 1a). However, MYB33/65 mRNA levels are not accurate indicators of their protein expression level due to the presence of a strong miR159-mediated translational repression mechanism [27]. Therefore, we investigated whether the mRNA levels of a downstream gene, CYSTEINE PROTEINASE1 (CP1; At4g36880) [15] would be an accurate indicator of MYB33/65 activity. We found CP1 mRNA levels tightly correlate with MYB33 and MYB65 mRNA levels in the absence of miR159 (the mir159ab mutant background; Additional file 1: Figure S1). Therefore, CP1 levels are used throughout the study as an indicator of MYB33/MYB65 activity.
Fig. 1

MiR159 constitutively silences MYB33/65 throughout rosette development. a–c Time-course transcript profiling of the miR159-MYB pathway in rosettes. The relative miRNA and mRNA levels were measured in rosettes approximately every 10 days throughout its development. The miR159 levels were normalized to sno101, the mRNA levels were normalized to CYCLOPHILIN. Values are the mean of three technical replicates with error bars representing the Standard Deviation (SD). Significant differences in values from the previous measurement are indicated with an *, as determined by the Students T-test. d Time-course GUS-staining assay for rosettes of MIR159b:GUS and mMYB33:GUS transgenic lines. Staining was carried out on ten individual rosettes per time point, at ten-day interval during plant growth; only the first and last staining results are shown

It was found that both miR159a and miR159b were expressed throughout rosette development. Both miRNAs had similar developmental profiles, increasing approximately two-fold during the first half of rosette development and then decreasing slightly (Fig. 1a). Although for miR159a, there were no significant differences in miRNA levels at the different time points, independent time-courses confirmed this pattern and the approximate two-fold increase in miR159a abundance (Additional file 2: Figure S2). For MYB33 and MYB65, their transcript levels fluctuated throughout rosette development. However, their levels did not inversely correlate with the miR159 profile, and so these observed differences are likely to be independent of regulation by miR159 (Fig. 1b). Additionally, these wild-type MYB33/MYB65 transcript levels are approximately 10-fold lower compared to levels in 35-day-old mir159ab rosettes (Additional file 1: Figure S1), suggesting MYB33/MYB65 are being repressed throughout vegetative development. Supporting this notion, mRNA of the CP1 marker gene remains low throughout wild-type rosette development (Fig. 1c), as CP1 mRNA in 35-day-old mir159ab rosettes is at least an order of magnitude higher (Additional file 1: Figure S1). In mir159ab rosettes, the CP1 mRNA abundance is similar to that of three-day-old wild-type seedlings, tissue that is known to have high MYB protein activity due to weak miR159 activity in seeds [15, 16]. Based on all the above data, MYB33 and MYB65 mRNA is likely being continually repressed throughout wild-type rosette development, and that the fluctuations observed in their transcript levels may not have any functional significance.

To determine in what rosette tissues MIR159 and its target MYB genes are transcribed, a β-glucuronidase (GUS)-staining assay was carried out over a 60-day time course on two transgenic Arabidopsis lines; MIR159b:GUS and mMYB33:GUS. The MIR159b:GUS line was constructed by fusing the GUS gene downstream of the MIR159b promoter, to visualize the transcriptional domain of MIR159b [10], while the mMYB33:GUS line carries a miR159-resistant version of MYB33, which enables visualization of the MYB33 transcriptional domain [9]. The rosettes of each line were harvested and stained every ten days. It was found that the rosettes of both lines stained at all the tested time points, from young seedling (10-day-old) to the late reproductive (60-day-old) growth phases (Fig. 1d). Moreover, the staining appeared ubiquitous throughout MIR159b:GUS and mMYB33:GUS rosettes. Patches of unstained cells in the older plants did not reflect a developmental pattern, but rather appeared to correspond to dead cells or a leaf staining penetration problem. Hence, both MIR159b and MYB33 appear transcribed in all cells and at all rosette developmental stages. Together, the data suggests the strong constitutive expression of miR159 that suppresses the expression of the constitutively transcribed MYB33 and MYB65 genes throughout Arabidopsis rosette development.

MiR159 is functionally active throughout rosette development

Since 35S-miR159 Arabidopsis plants have no obvious vegetative defects [12] and miR159 appears to constantly silence MYB33 and MYB65 under normal growth conditions (Fig. 1), a major impact of the miR159-MYB pathway in the rosette only appears possible if miR159 levels can be decreased enabling MYB33/MYB65 expression. To test this idea, a XVE-MIM159 transgene was transformed into Arabidopsis (Fig. 2a). XVE is a transactivator that can be induced by estrogen (e.g. 17-β-estradiol), resulting in transcriptional activation of the downstream transgene [28], while the MIM159 gene carries a non-cleavable miR159 binding site that inhibits miR159 function [29]. Primary XVE-MIM159 transformants were selected and grown for 21 days so that rosettes were well established, and were then treated with either 10 μM 17-β-estradiol (inducer) or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; dissolving solution, negative control). After two weeks of 17-β-estradiol treatment, rosettes contained upwardly curled leaves (Fig. 2a). This occurred in the older leaves of the plant, consistent with the older leaves of mir159ab displaying the strongest curl. Such phenotypes were not observed in XVE-MIM159 transformants treated with just DMSO or in any wild-type plants grown under our conditions. Additionally, MYB33, MYB65 and CP1 mRNA levels were elevated in 17-β-estradiol treated XVE-MIM159 plants (Fig. 2b). Together, this data suggests that miR159 function is constantly active in developing rosettes and perturbation of this function results in de-repression of MYB33/65 expression accompanied with morphological alterations to the rosette. This raises the possibility that the miR159-MYB module may be involved in response to environmental stress(es), where repression of miR159 by a stress may potentially activate MYB33/65 expression, resulting in morphological alterations in response to the stress.
Fig. 2

Morphological and molecular phenotypes via induced inhibition of miR159. a Application of 17-β-estradiol to 21-day-old XVE-MIM159 transformants induced leaf-curling (red circled). The representative picture was taken when plants were 35-day-old short-day grown plants. b qRT-PCR of MYB33, MYB65 and CP1 mRNA levels in 35-day-old XVE-MIM159 rosettes with either mock (M) or inducer (I) treatments. mRNA levels were normalized to CYCLOPHILIN. Values are the mean of three technical replicates with error bars representing the SD. Significant differences in values from the untreated are indicated with an *

The miR159-MYB33/MYB65 pathway has no major impact in the response to common abiotic stresses

MiR159 function has been implicated in plant response to abiotic stresses, as miR159 levels are repressed during heat stress in wheat [13] or in response to drought stress in potato [4]. For Arabidopsis, we searched the GENEVESTIGATOR platform (https://www.genevestigator.com/gv/) and eFP Browser (http://bar.utoronto.ca/efp/cgi-bin/efpWeb.cgi) for growth conditions that may activate CP1 transcription based on the assumption that this gene will be activated if miR159 function is compromised. However, CP1 mRNA levels were found to remain low under all examined growth conditions and stresses (data not shown). Hence, it is unclear whether the miR159-MYB33/MYB65 pathway is playing a major role in response to abiotic/biotic stresses in Arabidopsis.

To investigate whether miR159 is responsive to abiotic/biotic stresses in Arabidopsis, wild-type plants were grown under several common environmental stresses including ABA application, heat, high light intensity, drought, and cold and miR159 levels were measured. Additionally, mir159ab.myb33.myb65 quadruple mutant plants were grown alongside to determine whether there are alterations to growth when the miR159-MYB33/65 pathway is mutated. Also included in the analysis was the loss-of-function mir159a mutant in which miR159 abundance is reduced to approximately 10 % of wild type levels, but is morphologically indistinguishable from wild-type [10], possibly making such a genotype sensitized to subtle perturbations of miR159 function which may not manifest in wild-type plants.

None of the tested stress conditions induced a major or obvious observable phenotypic difference between wild-type (Col), mir159a and mir159ab.myb33.myb65 plants, where the two mutant genotypes appear indistinguishable from wild-type when grown under stress conditions (Fig. 3a). Consistent with this, none of the stress conditions, or the stress-related ABA hormone, resulted in suppression of miR159 to levels in which MYB33/65 expression would be predicted to be de-repressed (Fig. 3b). MiR159 levels in plants subjected to high temperature had the lowest relative miR159 abundance, but this appears due to a higher level of the normalizing reference gene (sno101) rather than a decrease in abundance of miR159 (Additional file 3: Figure S3). Therefore, of the different conditions, low-temperature treatment appeared to result in the lowest levels of miR159, although this reduction was not statistically different from untreated (Fig. 3b). Nevertheless, we investigated miR159 response in cold stress further (Fig. 4). However, the mRNA levels of CP1 remained unchanged between Col and the sensitized background, mir159a (Student’s Test: P > 0.05) (Fig. 4b), indicating that miR159-mediated silencing of MYB33/65 had not been strongly perturbed. This supports the observation that the Col, mir159a and mir159ab.myb33.myb65 plants displayed no strong morphological differences under low temperature stress (Fig. 4a). From these experiments, it appears that the miR159-MYB33/65 pathway plays no major role resulting in an obvious phenotypic impact in response to these common abiotic stress conditions.
Fig. 3

Morphological and molecular analysis of stressed Arabidopsis miR159-MYB pathway mutants. a Phenotypic comparison of rosettes of Col, mir159ab.myb33.myb65 and mir159a plants treated with ABA, high temperature, high light, drought and cold. Plants were grown for two weeks at 21 °C and then subjected to three weeks of stress treatment (b) Taqman microRNA assays measuring miR159a levels in wild-type plants subjected to the above treatments. Levels were normalized to sno101. Values are the mean of three technical replicates with error bars representing the SD. Significant differences in values from the control are indicated with an *

Fig. 4

Morphological and molecular analysis of low-temperature effect on the Arabidopsis miR159-MYB pathway mutants. a Phenotypic comparison of rosettes of Col, mir159a, mir159ab and mir159ab.myb33.myb65 plants stressed with low-temperature. Plants were grown for three weeks at 21 °C and then grown for eight weeks at 4 °C. b qRT-PCR analysis of MYB33, MYB65 and CP1 mRNA levels in the above rosettes. The mRNA levels were normalized to CYCLOPHILIN. Values are the mean of three technical replicates with error bars representing the SD. Significant differences in values from wild-type is indicated with an *

Expression of viral silencing suppressors failed to strongly inhibit miR159

One likely biotic factor that could inhibit miR159 is the expression of viral silencing suppressor (VSS) proteins, which can interfere with one or more steps/factors of plant miRNA biogenesis/action. To test this idea, 35S-P19 and 35S-P0 transgenes encoding the VSSs P19 and P0 respectively were transformed into Arabidopsis and multiple transformants were obtained for both constructs. Most 35S-P19 transformants displayed reduced rosette sizes, indicating that P19 expression perturbs Arabidopsis development (Fig. 5a), a finding previously observed [30]. However, these rosettes displayed no obvious leaf-curling, suggesting that 35S-P19 expression was not strongly perturbing miR159 function. By contrast, many 35S-P0 transgenic plants developed severe morphological abnormalities, which were characterized by a reduced rosette size and curled leaves (Fig. 5a). These abnormalities were consistent with what had been previously reported for this 35S-P0 transgene [31], having characteristics similar to that of mir159ab rosettes and thus were further investigated.
Fig. 5

Constitutive expression of VSSs does not strongly perturb the miR159 silencing of MYB33/65. a Different phenotypes developed in 28-day-old 35S-P19 and 35S-P0 primary transformants with wild-type (Col) grown alongside as a control. b The representative classification of developmental defects among 35S-P0 primary transformants. Class I: wild-type-looking; Class II: mild reduction in rosette size and partially curled leaves; Class III: all leaves curled group; Class IV: severely stunted and all leaves curled. c qRT-PCR analysis of relative mRNA levels in the different classes. Significant difference in values from the control is indicated with an *. d Comparison of P0 mRNA levels between 35S-P0(Col) and 35S-P0(myb33.myb65) with the same classified phenotypes. The RNA samples were extracted from 26-day-old plants. Col and myb33.myb65 were used as controls. P0 mRNA levels were normalized to UBIQUITIN (At4g05320), while MYB33/65 and CP1 were normalized to that of CYCLOPHILIN. Values are the mean of three technical replicates with error bars representing the SD. Significant differences between 35S-P0(Col) and 35S-P0(myb33,65) values are indicated with an *

First, the 35S-P0 primary transformants were grouped into four classes, based on the severity of rosette defects (Fig. 5b). Next, the P0 transcript level was measured in each class and was found to strongly correlate with the severity of morphological abnormalities (Fig. 5c), suggesting the P0-induced phenotypes are dose-dependent. To determine whether these phenotypes were potentially due to inhibition of miR159 function, MYB33 and MYB65 transcript levels were measured by qRT-PCR. With the exception of Class I (wild-type looking phenotype), mild increases (1–3 fold) of MYB33 and MYB65 transcript levels were observed in all other 35S-P0 classes, positively correlating with the severity of abnormalities and the level of P0 transcript (Fig. 5c). However, although increases in CP1 mRNA levels also positively correlated with both the P0 and MYB33/65 transcript levels (Fig. 4c), the fold change of CP1 mRNA level was much lower than that observed in mir159ab, both in this study (Fig. 4b) and in previous reports [15]. This suggests that perturbation of miR159 function by P0 expression is mild and de-regulation of MYB33/65 may not be strongly impacting the phenotype of the 35S-P0 plants.

To investigate this possibility, the 35S-P0 transgene was transformed into a loss-of-function myb33.myb65 mutant [35S-P0(myb33.myb65)] and grown alongside 35S-P0 Col transformants [35S-P0(Col)]. The 35S-P0(myb33.myb65) transformants developed similar phenotypes to those of 35S-P0(Col) and could be grouped into the same phenotypic classes (class I, II, III and IV as shown in Fig. 5b). Moreover, qRT-PCR data demonstrated that the P0 transcript levels were similar in comparable 35S-P0(Col) and 35S-P0(myb33,myb65) phenotypic classes (Fig. 5d). This finding indicated that similar P0 expression levels triggered similar phenotypic defects in both Col and myb33.myb65 plants. Hence, these P0-induced phenotypes are largely MYB33 and MYB65 independent, and not related to the mild increase of MYB33 and MYB65 mRNA levels in 35S-P0(Col). This agreed with the weak induction of CP1 (Fig. 5c). Together, these data suggest that P0 expression is unable to perturb miR159 sufficiently to result in strong de-repression of MYB33/65 expression.

The response of a myb33.myb65 mutant to Turnip Mosaic Virus is indistinguishable from wild-type

The failure of the transgenically expressed VSSs to strongly inhibit miR159 function may relate to their expression levels, which can be very high during viral infection [32]. Thus, to further investigate the possibility of perturbing miR159 function with a biotic stress, Arabidopsis was infected with Turnip Mosaic Virus (TuMV) that contains the VSS HELPER COMPONENT-PROTEINASE (HC-Pro), which sequesters sRNA duplexes [33, 34]. TuMV inoculations were made by infecting two leaves of three week-old wild-type (Col) plants, followed by two weeks of post-inoculation growth at 21 °C, followed by one week at 15 °C. This lower growth temperature was used as there is evidence that it promotes viral infections [35–37].

Three weeks post-inoculation, the infected rosettes developed symptoms including inhibited growth, upwardly-folded and twisted leaves, and exaggerated serrations of leaf edges and accelerated senescence (Fig. 6a). These symptoms vary in severity, which could be approximated as mild or severe with respect to the rosette size (Additional file 4: Figure S4). To explore the impact of TuMV infection on the miR159-MYB pathway, transcript levels of TuMV, MYB33 and CP1 were analysed in the TuMV-infected wild-type rosettes by qRT-PCR in two plants displaying mild symptoms and two plants displaying severe symptoms. First, analysis found that TuMV RNA accumulated to higher levels in the rosettes classified with severe symptoms, suggesting different levels of viral infection (Fig. 6b). Correlating with these TuMV transcript levels were MYB33 mRNA levels that were higher (~2.5 fold) in the TuMV-infected plants compared with uninfected controls (Fig. 6b). Consistent with possible MYB33 de-regulation, CP1 mRNA levels had increased (3–4 fold) in most of these infected rosettes. Generally, the abundance of mature miR159a/b were found to accumulate to higher levels in TuMV-infected rosettes (Fig. 6c), consistent with the role of HC-Pro in sequestrating sRNA duplexes, so an increased miR159 abundance likely reflects an accumulation of sequestered miR159 [38]. Although all these data suggest that viral infection can inhibit miR159, given the weak induction of CP1 in most infected plants, this would predict that MYB33/65 has only been weakly de-repressed.
Fig. 6

TuMV infection does not appear to strongly perturb miR159 silencing of MYB33/65. a Morphological comparison between TuMV-infected Col and myb33.myb65 rosettes (21-day-post infection). Plants were inoculated with either Na2PO4 (mock) or TuMV. b qRT-PCR analysis of relative mRNA accumulations in rosettes with TuMV-symptoms being classified as either mild (M) or severe (S). All mRNA levels were normalized to CYCLOPHILIN. Error bars represent the SD of three technical replicates. c Analysis of mature miR159 levels in three TuMV-infected rosettes, T1-T3. The miR159 levels were normalized to sno101. Values are the mean of three technical replicates with error bars representing the SD

To gauge the impact of TuMV infection on other miRNAs families, the mRNA levels of the canonical miRNA targets PHABULOSA (PHB; miR165/166 target), CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON 1 (CUC1; miR164 target), AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 4 (ARF4; miR390 target) and TCP4 (miR319 target) were measured by qRT-PCR. The mRNA levels of PHB, CUC1 and ARF4 were found to increase (8–15 fold) in the rosettes showing severe TuMV symptoms (Fig. 6b). These were generally higher fold-increases than that of MYB33 (~3 fold, Fig. 6b). Only TCP4 (~2 fold) had mRNA levels increases similar to MYB33, possibly due to the low expression of miR319 in the rosette [39, 40]. Therefore, these data suggest that in comparison with miR159, other miRNA pathways might be more susceptible to de-regulation by TuMV infection, making a stronger contribution to the observed symptoms.

Finally, to determine the contribution of MYB33/65 de-regulation to the manifestation of TuMV symptoms, a comparison of TuMV-infected Col and myb33.myb65 plants was performed. Both TuMV-infected Col and myb33.myb65 plants developed similar abnormal leaves and rosettes that appeared indistinguishable from one another (Fig. 6a). Together, all this data suggest that, although TuMV can inhibit miR159, it may do only weakly, being of no major physiological consequence for the plant in response to viral infection.

Discussion

The miR159-MYB33/65 pathway has no major impact on rosette development or abiotic stress response

In Arabidopsis, several conserved miRNA families (e.g. miR156, miR164 and miR165/166) control rosette development via regulation of their targets in specific spatiotemporal manners, impacting major leaf developmental traits such as phase change, leaf polarity and serration [41–44]. In contrast, miR159 appears constitutively expressed throughout rosette development, both spatially and temporally, where it constantly represses MYB33/65 expression as CP1 mRNA levels remained low. This extends our previous data showing that MYB33 and MYB65 are strongly repressed in Arabidopsis vegetative tissues [15, 16]. From our data we cannot rule out that MYB33/65 are expressed transiently or in a subtle cell type(s), where they may subtly impact development. However, it would appear that these genes are not playing a dominant role in Arabidopsis rosette developmental ontogeny, at least under standard laboratory growth conditions. Such a case is similar in rice, where the absence of GAMYB and GAMYB-like transcripts in vegetative tissues and the lack of obvious vegetative developmental abnormalities of a gamyb mutant, implies these genes play no major role in vegetative development [2, 7].

Despite the lack of clear function, the pathway remains active throughout rosette development as inducible inhibition of miR159 could induce leaf curling. Therefore, this led to the hypothesis that the miR159-MYB33/65 pathway may be responsive to an abiotic stress, where if miR159 is repressed, de-repression of MYB33/65 may possibly result in physiological/developmental outcomes that contribute to stress tolerance. Supporting such a possibility are numerous studies reporting the alteration of miR159 levels in response to stress, implicating miR159 as a general stress-responsive miRNA [4, 13, 19–23]. Despite this, we could find no evidence to indicate that miR159 becomes repressed under similar stress conditions, or changes in response to stress-related hormones such as ABA. Again, we cannot rule out that in certain cell types or under other stress conditions, or a combination of stress conditions, the miR159-MYB33/65 pathway does play a role. For example, the myb33.myb65 mutant has been shown to respond differently to wild-type after 4 h at 44 °C [13]. However, from our data, it appears that no major functional impact in the response to the tested stresses can be ascribed to the miR159-MYB pathway, as there was no overt difference between wild-type and the mir159ab.myb33.myb65 mutant in response to these stresses. This also suggests that functionally relevant miR159 regulation of other targets is improbable as the absence of miR159 in the mir159ab.myb33.myb65 mutant does not make a major difference under the tested stresses. Therefore, we propose that many of the fluctuations in miR159 levels observed during stress may have no major impact of functional consequence.

Expression of VSSs fails to strongly inhibit miR159 repression of MYB33/65

Consequently, we shifted our attention to biotic stresses, including viruses that express silencing suppressors (VSS) that could repress miR159. As many viruses can result in symptoms resembling mir159ab-like phenotypes, such as Tomato Leaf curl virus that causes leaves to curl upwards to which miR159 has been linked [25], we explored whether the transgenic expression of VSSs or infection with viruses containing VSSs could perturb miR159. However, in these experiments, all our data indicates that miR159 silencing of MYB33/65 is not perturbed enough for this pathway to play a major role in response to such biotic stresses. For instance, similar P0 expression levels in 35S-P0(Col) and 35S-P0(myb33myb65) plants triggered symptoms of indistinguishable severity (Fig. 5d), indicating that the up-regulated expression of MYB33/65 in 35S-P0(Col) was not a major factor in the observed P0-induced symptoms. Additionally, TuMV induced defects in Col and myb33.myb65 plants appeared phenotypically indistinguishable (Fig. 6a), consistent with the marginal increased levels of MYB33/65 and CP1 in TuMV infected Col plants (Fig. 6b), again suggesting that perturbation of miR159-mediated regulation of MYB33/MYB65 plays no major role in TuMV symptoms. Both experiments suggest miR159 silencing of MYB33/65 is robust; given the morphological defects of the 35S-P0 plants or the transcript profiling in the TuMV challenged plants, it was likely that other endogenous miRNA pathways were strongly inhibited contributing in the observed morphological defects.

However, Du et al. [24] reported a possible causative role of miR159 in disease symptoms induced by a Cucumber Mosaic Virus (i.e. Fny-CMV), as they compared the Fny-CMV infected Col and myb33.myb65, showing phenotypic evidence that the infected Col plants displayed more deformation of the upper, young systemically infected leaves. Based on this, they concluded that miR159 contributes to Fny-CMV induced symptoms [24]. Therefore, the possibility cannot be excluded that VSSs differentially perturb the different miRNA families, and that a VSS exists that preferentially perturbs miR159, like the identified viral impact on miR168 accumulation [37].

Conclusions

Hence, despite our efforts, and a large body of previous work examining miR159 expression in Arabidopsis rosettes, we have been unable to define a major role for the miR159-MYB33/65 pathway in the rosette. What is clear is that miR159 robustly represses MYB33/65, where neither P0 and P19 VSSs nor a range of stresses appear able to reduced miR159 sufficiently to enable de-regulation of MYB33/MYB65 expression to result in an obvious phenotype impact in response to the stress. With regards to general inhibitors of the miRNA pathway, such as VSSs, it seems other miRNA systems are more sensitive to these inhibitors than miR159. It would appear that an inhibitor that is specific to miR159 would be needed to result in activation of the MYB pathway. Curiously, in Arabidopsis seeds, miR159 silencing of MYB33/65 appears weak relative to rosette tissue [16], suggesting the presence of such an inhibitor, or another factor that controls silencing efficacy, may exist.

Although the highly conserved miR159-MYB pathway may have a regulatory role in the vegetative tissues of other plant species, here our data re-enforces the notion, that in Arabidopsis, the predominant function of miR159 is to restrict the expression of MYB33 and MYB65 to seeds and anthers. Interestingly, other GAMYB-like genes in Arabidopsis, such as MYB101, are predominantly transcribed in seeds and anthers, and this is also appears the case for GAMYB in cereals [2, 13], both of which strongly contrast the apparent ubiquitous transcription of MYB33/65 in Arabidopsis. Given that there are multiple GAMYB-like genes required for different steps of male development in Arabidopsis [9, 45, 46], during the duplication and divergence of MYB33/65, these genes appear to have acquired this near constitutive transcriptional domain. As the activity of MYB33 and MYB65 promotes male fertility, there would be strong selection pressure for their strong expression. Hence, we speculate this may result in strong transcription not only in the anther, but also in vegetative tissues. Any negative impact of unnecessary MYB33/65 transcription in vegetative tissues (followed by the required miR159 silencing), would be vastly outweighed by enhanced male fertility. Indeed, although it could be considered that this miR159-MYB33/65 “futile” pathway may be energetically wasteful, there appears no obvious difference between wild-type and mir159ab.myb33.myb65 rosettes, and so such an energy investment may be not be large enough to confer a selective disadvantage. Therefore, we speculate, that if a gene is miRNA-regulated, there may be less pressure on cis-acting promoter elements to define its required spatial/temporal transcription pattern, as post-transcriptional regulation by miRNAs provides an alternative mechanism to achieve the required protein expression.

Methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia-0 (Col-0) was used in all experiments and is referred to as wild type. The following mutants were described previously and represent T-DNA insertional loss-of-function mutants: mir159a, mir159ab [10] and myb33.myb65 [9]. The transgenic lines MIR159b:GUS and mMYB33:GUS were previously generated and described [10]. Seeds were either sown on soil (Debco Plugger soil mixed with Osmocote Extra Mini fertilizer at 3.5 g/L) or on agar plates containing 0.5X MS (Murashige and Skoog, 2.2 g/L), and stratified at 4 °C overnight in the dark. Plants were grown in 21 °C growth cabinets under either long day (LD) (16 h light/8 h dark, fluorescent illumination of 150 μmol m−2 s−1) or short day (SD) photoperiod (8 h light/16 h dark, fluorescent illumination of 150 μmol/m2/sec). For stress treatments, plants were grown side by side in soil for two weeks in a 21 °C growth chamber (a LD photoperiod was applied throughout the treatment if not otherwise specified), and then transferred into a 4 °C growth room (low-temperature treatment), or high temperature (32 °C day/28 °C night), or high light intensity (~500 μmol m−2 s−1), or provided with ~800 mL tap water per litre soil per two weeks (drought stress). One tray (30 plants) were used for each treatment. For TuMV infection, TuMV-infected tobacco leaves were ground in 5 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7) containing silicon carbide, which were used to mechanically inoculate two largest leaves of three-week-old Arabidopsis rosettes.

Generation of transgenic Arabidopsis

Gateway compatible entry vectors harbouring P0 and P19 were sub-cloned into the Gateway compatible destination vector pMDC32 containing the 35S promoter [47] via a Gateway LR Clonase reaction according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). For inducible expression of MIM159, the destination vector pMDC7 containing the 17-β-estradiol inducible transcription activator XVE was used [28]. The LR reaction mixture was transformed into E. coli Alpha-Select Gold Efficiency competent cells (Bioline) by heat shock with bacteria grown on LB plates containing the corresponding selection antibiotics (50 μg/mL Kanamycin for pMDC32 based vectors, 50 μg/mL spectinomycin for pMDC7 based vectors).

All expression vectors were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 by electroporation [48], and incubated on LB plates containing Rifamycin (50 μg/mL), Gentamicin (25 μg/mL), and either Kanamycin (50 μg/mL for pMDC32 based vectors) or spectinomycin (50 μg/mL for pMDC7 based vectors). Agrobacterium was prepared in infiltration medium containing 5 % sucrose and 0.03 % Silwet L-77 and used to transform Arabidopsis via the floral dip method [49]. For estradiol induction of the XVE-MIM159 transgene, three-week primary transformants were sprayed with either 10 μM 17-β-estradiol (inducer) or 10 μM dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, solution to dissolve 17-β-estradiol). The treatment was repeated once every three days for two weeks.

PCR genotyping of T-DNA insertional alleles

DNA extractions were performed using the Edward preparation method (Edwards et al., 1991). Then, PCR was carried out using Platinum® Taq DNA Polymerase (Invitrogen) in a 20 μL reaction volume. 2 μL of genomic DNA was used for each PCR, with final primer concentration at 0.2 μM. PCR conditions used were one cycle of 94 °C/ 2 min; 30 cycles of 95 °C/30 sec, 60 °C/30 sec, 72 °C/1–2 min; one cycle of 72 °C for 5 min. 10 μL of each PCR reaction was analysed on a 1 % agarose gel by electrophoresis. Primer sequences used for genotyping are those that have been previously reported [9, 10].

Quantitative Real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and Taqman microRNA analysis

TRIzol® (Invitrogen) was used for RNA extraction as has previously been reported (Allen at al., 2010). For qRT-PCR, 30–50 μg of total RNA was treated with 25 μL of RQ1 RNase-Free DNase in a 100 μL reactions following the manufacturer’s protocol (Promega), with the addition of 2.5 μL of RNaseOut™ Recobinant RNase Inhibitor (Invitrogen). The digested samples were purified with the SpectrumIM plant Total RNA Kit (Sigma Aldrich) to remove digested DNA fragments. cDNA synthesis was carried out using SuperScript® III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) and oligo dT primers according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For qRT-PCR, Platinum® Taq DNA Polymerase (Invitrogen) with SYB Green (Sigma) and dNTPs (Fisher Biotec) added was used as a master mix. 10 μL of each cDNA sample was added to 9.6 μL of SYB/Taq master mix with 0.4 μL of forward and reverse primers at 10 μmol each. All qRT-PCR reactions were carried out on a Rotor-Gene Q real-time PCR machine (Qiagen) using the following cycling: one cycle of 95 °C/5 min; 45 cycles of 95 °C/15 sec, 60 °C/15 sec, 72 °C/20 sec. CYCLOPHILIN (At2g29960) or UBIQUITIN (At4g05320) was used to normalize mRNA levels using the comparative quantitation program in the Rotor-Gene Q software provided by Qiagen, and these relative measurements are presented.

For determining mature miR159 levels, TRIzol purified RNA sample was directly subjected to TaqMan MicroRNA Assays (Applied Biosystems) following the protocol described by Allen et al. [17]. This assay used 10 ng of each RNA sample to perform the retro-transcription, with the use of a TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems), and each reaction included the stem-loop RT primers for both the miR159a (or miR159b) and the normalization sRNA sno101. Then, each cDNA was assayed in triplicate using the Rotor-Gene Q machine using the cycling conditions described above. The Expression of miR159a (or miR159b) were normalized with sno101 using the comparative quantitation analysis program in the Rotor-Gene Q software and these relative measurements are presented. Values presented for both mRNA and miRNA measurements are the mean of three technical replicates (three cDNA syntheses) of one biological replicate (one RNA isolation of multiple plants unless otherwise stated). The value for each technical replicate (cDNA reaction) is determined by assaying the individual technical replicate three times. Experiments were then independently repeated at least once (independent biological replicates) to confirm findings. Unpaired T-tests were applied to values to determine if differences were statistically different.

GUS staining

GUS staining was performed on rosette tissues using the method described by Jefferson [50] with the following modifications: 1) Rosette tissues were collected and fixed with 90 % acetone for 20 min at room temperature, followed by a 30 min vacuum infiltration with GUS staining buffer 1 (50 mM Na phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, 0.2 % Triton X-100, 2 mM potassium ferricyanide and 2 mM potassium ferrocyanide). 2) Histochemical reactions were performed by a 30 ~ 60 min vacuum infiltration with staining buffer 2 (staining buffer 1 plus 2 mM X-gluc) and then an overnight incubation at 37 °C. The staining buffer was removed by successive washes with 20 %, 50 %, 70 % and 90 % ethanol (1 h per wash), and the cleared tissues were photographed using an Olympus Dissecting Microscope OLYMPUS SZX2-ILLK (Tokyo, Japan) (for 10 ~ 20-day-old seedlings).

Abbreviations

ARF4 : 

AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 4

GUS: 

β-glucuronidase

CMV: 

Cucumber Mosaic Virus

CUC1 : 

CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON 1

CP1 : 

CYSTEINE PROTEINASE1

DMSO: 

Dimethyl sulfoxide

GA: 

Gibberellin

HC-Pro: 

HELPER COMPONENT-PROTEINASE

PHB : 

PHABULOSA

PCD: 

Programmed cell death

TuMV: 

Turnip Mosaic Virus

VSS: 

Viral silencing suppressor

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Dr Craig wood (CSIRO) for the 35S-P19 and 35S-P0 constructs and the ABRC for the MIM159 plasmid.

Funding

This research was supported by an Australian Research Council grant DP130103697 and International ANU PhD scholarship to Y.L..

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors’ contributions

YL designed and performed experiments that correspond to Figs. 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 and also drafted the manuscript. MA-P, helped designed and performed experiments that correspond to Fig. 3, and supervised YL for experiments in Figs. 1 and 5. GW helped perform experiments for Fig. 3. M-BW provide expertise for experiments in Fig. 6 and co-supervised YL. AAM supervised the project and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Plant Science Division, Research School of Biology, Australian National University
(2)
CSIRO, Agriculture

References

  1. Axtell MJ, Bartel DP. Antiquity of microRNAs and their targets in land plants. Plant Cell. 2005;17:1658–73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Tsuji H, Aya K, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Shimada Y, Nakazono M, Watanabe R, Nishizawa NK, Gomi K, Shimada A, Kitano H, Ashikari M, Matsuoka M. GAMYB controls different sets of genes and is differentially regulated by microRNA in aleurone cells and anthers. Plant J. 2006;47:427–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Palatnik JF, Wollmann H, Schommer C, Schwab R, Boisbouvier J, Rodriguez R, Warthmann N, Allen E, Dezulian T, Huson D, Carrington JC, Weigel D. Sequence and expression differences underlie functional specialization of Arabidopsis microRNAs miR159 and miR319. Dev Cell. 2007;13:115–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Yang J, Zhang N, Mi X, Wu L, Ma R, Zhu X, Yao L, Jin X, Si H, Wang D. Identification of miR159s and their target genes and expression analysis under drought stress in potato. Comput Biol Chem. 2014;53:204–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Csukasi F, Donaire L, Casañal A, Martínez-Priego L, Botella MA, Medina-Escobar N, Llave C, Valpuesta V. Two strawberry miR159 family members display developmental-specific expression patterns in the fruit receptacle and cooperatively regulate Fa-GAMYB. New Phytol. 2012;195:47–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Li W-F, Zhang S-G, Han S-Y, Wu T, Zhang J-H, Qi L-W. Regulation of LaMYB33 by miR159 during maintenance of embryogenic potential and somatic embryo maturation in Larix kaempferi (Lamb.). Carr Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2013;113:131–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Kaneko M, Inukai Y, Ueguchi-tanaka M, Itoh H, Izawa T, Kobayashi Y. Loss-of-function mutations of the rice GAMYB gene impairs alpha-amylase expression in aleurone and flower development. Plant Cell. 2004;16:33–44.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Aya K, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Kondo M, Hamada K, Yano K, Nishimura M, Matsuoka M. Gibberellin modulates anther development in rice via the transcriptional regulation of GAMYB. Plant Cell. 2009;21:1453–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Millar AA, Gubler F. The Arabidopsis GAMYB-like genes, MYB33 and MYB65, are microRNA-regulated genes that redundantly facilitate anther development. Plant Cell. 2005;17:705–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Allen RS, Li J, Stahle MI, Dubroué A, Gubler F, Millar AA. Genetic analysis reveals functional redundancy and the major target genes of the Arabidopsis miR159 family. Pro Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:16371–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Achard P, Herr A, Baulcombe DC, Harberd NP. Modulation of floral development by a gibberellin-regulated microRNA. Development. 2004;131:3357–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Schwab R, Palatnik JF, Riester M, Schommer C, Schmid M, Weigel D. Specific effects of microRNAs on the plant transcriptome. Dev Cell. 2005;8:517–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Wang Y, Sun F, Cao H, Peng H, Ni Z, Sun Q, Yao Y. TamiR159 directed wheat TaGAMYB cleavage and its involvement in anther development and heat response. PLoS One. 2012;7:e48445.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Guo W-J, Ho T-H. An abscisic acid-induced protein, HVA22, inhibits gibberellin-mediated programmed cell death in cereal aleurone cells. Plant Physiol. 2008;147:1710–22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Alonso-Peral MM, Li J, Li Y, Allen RS, Schnippenkoetter W, Ohms S, White RG, Millar AA. The microRNA159-regulated GAMYB-like genes inhibit growth and promote programmed cell death in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2010;154:757–71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Alonso-Peral MM, Sun C, Millar AA. MicroRNA159 can act as a switch or tuning microRNA independently of its abundance in Arabidopsis. PLoS One. 2012;7:e34751.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Allen RS, Li J, Alonso-Peral MM, White RG, Gubler F, Millar AA. MicroR159 regulation of most conserved targets in Arabidopsis has negligible phenotypic effects. Silence. 2010;1:18.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Rajagopalan R, Vaucheret H, Trejo J, Bartel DP. A diverse and evolutionarily fluid set of microRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes Dev. 2006;20:3407–25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang YG, An M, Zhou SF, She YH, Li WC, Fu FL. Expression profile of maize microRNAs corresponding to their target genes under drought stress. Biochem Genet. 2014;52:474–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kitazumi A, Kawahara Y, Onda TS, De Koeyer D, de Los Reyes BG. Implications of miR166 and miR159 induction to the basal response mechanisms of an andigena potato (Solanum tuberosum subsp. andigena) to salinity stress, predicted from network models in Arabidopsis. Genome. 2015;58:13–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Chen H, Chen X, Chen D, Li J, Zhang Y, Wang A. A comparison of the low temperature transcriptomes of two tomato genotypes that differ in freezing tolerance: Solanum lycopersicum and Solanum habrochaites. BMC Plant Biol. 2015;15:132.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang B, Sun YF, Song N, Wang XJ, Feng H, Huang LL. Kang ZS Identification of UV-B-induced microRNAs in wheat. Genet Mol Res. 2013;12:4213–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu Z, Kumari S, Zhang L, Zheng Y, Ware D. Characterization of miRNAs in response to short-term waterlogging in three inbred lines of Zea mays. PLoS One. 2012;7, e39786.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Du Z, Chen A, Chen W, Westwood JH, Baulcombe DC, Carr JP. Using a viral vector to reveal the role of microRNA159 in disease symptom induction by a severe strain of Cucumber mosaic virus. Plant Physiol. 2014;164:1378–88.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Naqvi AR, Haq QMR, Mukherjee SK. MicroRNA profiling of tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus (tolcndv) infected tomato leaves indicates that de-regulation of miR159/319 and miR172 might be linked with leaf curl disease. Virol J. 2010;7:281.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Djami-Tchatchou AT, Dubery IA. Lipopolysaccharide perception leads to dynamic alterations in the microtranscriptome of Arabidopsis thaliana cells and leaf tissues. BMC Plant Biol. 2015;15:79.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Li J, Reichel M, Millar AA. Determinants beyond both complementarity and cleavage govern miR159 efficacy in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004232.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Zuo J, Niu QW, Chua NH. Technical advance: An estrogen receptor-based transactivator XVE mediates highly inducible gene expression in transgenic plants. Plant J. 2000;24:265–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Todesco M, Rubio-Somoza I, Paz-Ares J, Weigel D. A collection of target mimics for comprehensive analysis of microRNA function in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1001031.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Chapman EJ, Prokhnevsky AI, Gopinath K, Dolja VV, Carrington JC. Viral RNA silencing suppressors inhibit the microRNA pathway at an intermediate step. Genes Dev. 2004;18:1179–86.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Fusaro AF, Correa RL, Nakasugi K, Jackson C, Kawchuk L, Vaslin MF, Waterhouse PM. The Enamovirus P0 protein is a silencing suppressor which inhibits local and systemic RNA silencing through AGO1 degradation. Virology. 2012;426:178–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Scholthof HB, Scholthof KB, Jackson AO. Identification of tomato bushy stunt virus host-specific symptom determinants by expression of individual genes from a potato virus X vector. Plant Cell. 1995;7:1157–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Bazzini AA, Hopp HE, Beachy RN, Asurmendi S. Infection and coaccumulation of tobacco mosaic virus proteins alter microRNA levels, correlating with symptom and plant development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:12157–62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Shiboleth YM, Haronsky E, Leibman D, Arazi T, Wassenegger M, Whitham SA, Gaba V, Gal-On A. The conserved FRNK box in HC-Pro, a plant viral suppressor of gene silencing, is required for small RNA binding and mediates symptom development. J Virol. 2007;81:13135–48.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Szittya G, Silhavy D, Molnár A, Havelda Z, Lovas A, Lakatos L, Bánfalvi Z, Burgyán J. Low temperature inhibits RNA silencing-mediated defence by the control of siRNA generation. EMBO J. 2003;22:633–40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Chellappan P, Vanitharani R, Ogbe F, Fauquet CM. Effect of temperature on geminivirus-induced RNA silencing in plants. Plant Physiol. 2005;138:1828–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Várallyay E, Válóczi A, Agyi A, Burgyán J, Havelda Z. Plant virus-mediated induction of miR168 is associated with repression of ARGONAUTE1 accumulation. EMBO J. 2010;29:3507–19.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Reyes JL, Chua N-H. ABA induction of miR159 controls transcript levels of two MYB factors during Arabidopsis seed germination. Plant J. 2007;49:592–606.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Warthmann N, Das S, Lanz C, Weigel D. Comparative analysis of the MIR319a microRNA locus in Arabidopsis and related Brassicaceae. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:892–902.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Nag A, King S, Jack T. miR319a targeting of TCP4 is critical for petal growth and development in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:22534–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Sieber P, Wellmer F, Gheyselinck J, Riechmann JL, Meyerowitz EM. Redundancy and specialization among plant microRNAs: role of the MIR164 family in developmental robustness. Development. 2007;134:1051–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Poethig RS. Small RNAs and developmental timing in plants. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2009;19:374–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Wu G, Park MY, Conway SR, Wang J-W, Weigel D, Poethig RS. The sequential action of miR156 and miR172 regulates developmental timing in Arabidopsis. Cell. 2009;138:750–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang L, Gu X, Xu D, Wang W, Wang H, Zeng M, Chang Z, Huang H, Cui X. miR396-targeted AtGRF transcription factors are required for coordination of cell division and differentiation during leaf development in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 2011;62:761–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Leydon AR, Beale KM, Woroniecka K, Castner E, Chen J, Horgan C, Palanivelu R, Johnson MA. Three MYB transcription factors control pollen tube differentiation required for sperm release. Curr Biol. 2013;23:1209–14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Liang Y, Tan ZM, Zhu L, Niu QK, Zhou JJ, Li M, Chen LQ, Zhang XQ, Ye D. MYB97, MYB101 and MYB120 function as male factors that control pollen tube-synergid interaction in Arabidopsis thaliana fertilization. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003933.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Curtis MD, Grossniklaus U. A gateway cloning vector set for high-throughput functional analysis of genes in planta. Plant Physiol. 2003;133:462–9.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Hellens R, Mullineaux P, Klee H. Technical Focus: a guide to Agrobacterium binary Ti vectors. Trends Plant Sci. 2000;5:446–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Clough SJ, Bent AF. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998;16:735–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Jefferson RA. Assaying chimeric genes in plants: The GUS gene fusion system. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 1987;5:387–405.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement