Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Plant Biology

Open Access

Nitrogen-driven stem elongation in poplar is linked with wood modification and gene clusters for stress, photosynthesis and cell wall formation

BMC Plant Biology201414:391

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-014-0391-3

Received: 22 September 2014

Accepted: 18 December 2014

Published: 30 December 2014

Abstract

Background

Nitrogen is an important nutrient, often limiting plant productivity and yield. In poplars, woody crops used as feedstock for renewable resources and bioenergy, nitrogen fertilization accelerates growth of the young, expanding stem internodes. The underlying molecular mechanisms of nitrogen use for extension growth in poplars are not well understood. The aim of this study was to dissect the nitrogen-responsive transcriptional network in the elongation zone of Populus trichocarpa in relation to extension growth and cell wall properties.

Results

Transcriptome analyses in the first two internodes of P. trichocarpa stems grown without or with nitrogen fertilization (5 mM NH4NO3) revealed 1037 more than 2-fold differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Co-expression analysis extracted a network containing about one-third of the DEGs with three main complexes of strongly clustered genes. These complexes represented three main processes that were responsive to N-driven growth: Complex 1 integrated growth processes and stress suggesting that genes with established functions in abiotic and biotic stress are also recruited to coordinate growth. Complex 2 was enriched in genes with decreased transcript abundance and functionally annotated as photosynthetic hub. Complex 3 was a hub for secondary cell wall formation connecting well-known transcription factors that control secondary cell walls with genes for the formation of cellulose, hemicelluloses, and lignin. Anatomical and biochemical analysis supported that N-driven growth resulted in early secondary cell wall formation in the elongation zone with thicker cell walls and increased lignin. These alterations contrasted the N influence on the secondary xylem, where thinner cell walls with lower lignin contents than in unfertilized trees were formed.

Conclusion

This study uncovered that nitrogen-responsive elongation growth of poplar internodes is linked with abiotic stress, suppression of photosynthetic genes and stimulation of genes for cell wall formation. Anatomical and biochemical analysis supported increased accumulation of cell walls and secondary metabolites in the elongation zone. The finding of a nitrogen-responsive cell wall hub may have wider implications for the improvement of tree nitrogen use efficiency and opens new perspectives on the enhancement of wood composition as a feedstock for biofuels.

Keywords

DevelopmentMetaxylemNitrogen usePopulus trichocarpaStressTranscriptomeWoodXylem

Background

Woody biomass is a valuable resource for the generation of renewable energy and an important feedstock for fiber, pulp and cellulose production [1]-[3]. It is formed during the process of secondary growth. The molecular regulation of secondary growth is intensively being studied in poplar and in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana [4]-[9]. For example, cell differentiation in the vascular cambium is determined by auxin, auxin transporters, and auxin-responsive transcription factors [7],[10]. Furthermore, transcriptional regulation involves members of the AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR (ARF), MYB, NAC, and WRKY gene families [11]-[14] whose interplay eventually determines the amounts of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin produced during secondary cell wall formation [7].

The prerequisite for secondary growth is primary growth and shoot elongation. The molecular regulation of cell division and differentiation have mainly been addressed in Arabidopsis [15],[16]. In the shoot apical meristem the transcription factors WUSCHEL (WUS) [17], CLAVATA (CLV), SHOOT MERISTEMLESS (STM) [18], and KNOX [19] have been identified as key actors in the control of the size of stem cell population and production of new cell files. They are regulated by hormones, like cytokinins, gibberellin and auxin [20]. Gradients of auxin and signaling peptides are important during the early steps of vascular development [7]. During primary growth, proto- and metaxylem elements are formed. Their differentiation is controlled by transcription factors of the VND (VASCULAR-RELATED NAC DOMAIN) family, VND7 and VND6 [21]. VNDs regulate down-stream transcription factors, especially MYB46 which plays a major role for the orchestration of biosynthetic genes for secondary cell wall formation [22]-[26]. Although primary growth that drives the elongation of the newly formed internodes is as important for wood production as secondary growth, very little is known about the molecular regulation underlying these developmental processes in poplars.

With regard to yield improvement, molecular links between primary growth and nitrogen (N) are of particular interest. Low N frequently limits productivity and consequently, fertilization can enhance yield [27]. Increased N availability results in enhanced leaf area production, increased photosynthesis and higher stem biomass production in poplars [28],[29]. However, the wood of fertilized poplars is often characterized by thinner cell walls, less lignification, and increased amounts of tension wood [30]-[35]. In the developing xylem, key transcription factors for wood formation such as WKRY and NAC domain factors were decreased in hybrid poplars exposed to high (7.5 mM NH4NO3) compared with those grown with adequate N supply (0.75 mM NH4NO3, [36]). Furthermore, the expression levels of several genes involved in hemicellulose and lignin biosynthesis were also reduced, while cellulose synthase increased under high compared with adequate N [36]. The observed transcriptional changes matched alterations in cell wall properties, for example the shift to lower lignin and higher cellulose concentrations in the wood of fertilized compared with non-fertilized poplars [36]. In contrast to radial growth, the influence of N on gene regulation during stem elongation has not been investigated. It is unknown whether high N mainly accelerates primary growth processes such as extension or whether it also impacts on cell wall properties. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of plant N usage for increased wood production and the consequences for wood properties is urgently needed.

In this study, we analyzed the genome-wide transcriptional responses to N fertilization in the elongation zone (EZ) of P. trichocarpa. We conducted co-expression analysis to establish networks of signaling, regulatory and functional genes underlying N-responsive stem growth. We dissected three main regulatory complexes that represent phytohormone-related development, regulation of photosynthesis and cell wall formation as the main processes underlying N-driven elongation growth. Because the transcriptional analysis predicted stimulation of the secondary metabolism in the EZ of N fertilized compared to unfertilized poplars, lignin and phenolic concentrations were also determined.

Methods

Plant material, growth conditions and treatment

Twenty-four Populus trichocarpa, cultivar Weser 6 (Kompetenzzentrum HessenRohstoffe, Germany) cuttings were planted in 5 L pots with 20% compost soil and 80% sand at the end of April, 2009. The cuttings were cultivated in a greenhouse for 2 months under long-day conditions (16 hours light from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m) with a photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) of 150 μmol · m−2 · s−1 (fluorescent lamps L58W/25 and 58 W/840, Osram, Munich, Germany, and TLD 58 W/840 Philips, Amsterdam, Netherlands). Afterwards, the plants were divided into two groups, of similar average height. One group was fertilized with 120 ml 5 mM NH4NO3 (HN); the other group received the same amount of tap water (LN). Both groups were irrigated twice a week for 1.5 months. At the harvest, the height and basal stem diameter were measured with a folding ruler and a caliper (Tchibo GmbH, Hamburg, Germany). The total fresh weight of leaves, stems and roots were weighed. Two to three centimeter-long basal stem segments were stored in FAE (2% (v/v) formaldehyde, 5% (v/v) acetic acid, 63% (v/v) ethanol). Preliminary analyses of growth showed that elongation was confined to the first 5 to 7 internodes. Here, the first two internodes from the top including shoot apex were harvested and called elongation zone (EZ). Developing xylem was harvested from a 10 cm long stem segment at the bottom (Figure 1). The surface of debarked wood was scraped with a razor blade as described previously [37],[38]. The samples, which consisted of a soft mush of tissue, were shock-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. Aliquots of fresh leaves, stems and roots were weighed, oven dried at 60°C for 2 weeks and weighed again. Total dry biomass of leaves, stems and roots were calculated as: dry mass of aliquot × whole plant tissue fresh mass/fresh mass of the aliquot.
Figure 1

Performance of poplars ( P. trichocarpa ) after 6 week of growth without or with addition of 5 mM NH 4 NO 3 . Stem positions used for sample collection are indicated.

Anatomical analyses

The second internodes counted from the top and bottom stem segments were fixed in FAE for one week, and transferred into plastic bottles with 70% ethanol for several days. Cross-sections (50 μm) were obtained with a sliding microtome (Reichert-Jung, Heidelberg, Germany). The sections were stained with Wiesner reagent (5.25 g phloroglucinol, 350 ml 95% ethanol, 175 ml 25% HCl) for 3 min [39] and mounted in 50% glycerol for microscopy. Sections were immediately viewed under a light microscope (Axioplan, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and photographed with 400-fold magnification using a digital camera (AxioCamMR3, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The image analysis software Image J (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/; NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA) was used to measure the thickness of the double fiber walls and vessel lumen areas.

Cross sections of 10-μm thickness from the second internode counted from the top and bottom stem segments (liquid nitrogen shock frozen samples) were obtained with a cryo-microtome (Reichert-Jung, Model 2800 Frigocut N, Leica Instruments GmbH, Nussloch, Germany). The sections were immediately mounted in 50% glycerol for microscopy. Sections were immediately viewed under UV light (filters: BP 546, FT580, LP590) with a light microscope (Axioplan, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and photographed with 400-fold magnification using a digital camera (AxioCamMR3, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Phenolic compounds showed blue and chloroplasts red fluorescence. Defined areas of 1000 μm2 were selected to count chloroplasts.

Lignin, phenolics and nitrogen analyses

To measure phenolics, frozen plant tissues were ground in a ball mill (Retsch, Haan, Germany). Fine powder (60 mg per sample) was extracted with 2 ml of 50% methanol in an ultrasonic bath (60 min, 40°C; Sonorex Super RK 510 H, Bandelin electronics, Berlin, Germany). The extract was centrifuged, the pellet was extracted once again in the dark in 2 ml of 50% methanol at room temperature for 60 min and the supernatants were combined for photometrical analysis of soluble phenolics with the Folin Ciocalteus method [31]. Catechin (Sigma-Aldrich, Deisenhofen, Germany) was measured to create a calibration curve and the phenolic concentrations were expressed as catechin equivalents.

Dry plant tissues were milled to a fine powder (MM2 Retsch, Haan, Germany) for the determination of lignin and nitrogen concentrations. To determine lignin, one to four mg dry powder materials were mixed with 25% acetyl bromide in acetic acid. The reaction tubes were incubated at 70°C for 30 min with shaking at 10 min intervals. After digestion, 250 μl sodium hydroxide (2 M) was added. After mixing, the reaction tubes were centrifuged with 15000 × g for 5 min at 4°C. The supernatant (138 μl) was added to new reaction tubes with 2.8 μl hydroxylamine (0.5 M) and 1.25 ml acetic acid (96%). A concentration series of coniferyl alcohol, analyzed with the same procedure as the analytical samples, was done to create a standard curve. The absorbance of the resulting solutions was measured at 280 nm after [40].

To determine nitrogen concentrations, aliquots of 0.7 - 0.9 mg dry milled powder were weighed (Sartorius Supermicro S4, Göttingen, Germany) into tin capsules (Hekatech, Wegberg, Germany) and analyzed in an Elemental Analyzer EA1108 (Carlo Erba Strumentazione, Rodano, Italy). Acetanilide (71.09% C, 10.36% N; Carlo Erba Strumentazione) was the standard.

Independent two-sample t-tests were carried out in Microsoft Excel to test whether means were significantly different at P < 0.05.

RNA extraction and cDNA preparation

Shock frozen tissue of the EZ was ground in a pre-cooled ball mill (Retsch, Hann, Germany). Total RNA was extracted from 1 g tissue powder using hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide extraction protocol [41]. The quantity and quality of total RNA were determined with a spectrophotometer (BioPhotometer, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) by determining the ratio of absorbance of the sample at 260 nm to that of 280 nm. To remove DNA, 10 μg preparations was treated with DNase (Turbo DNA-free kit, Ambion, Austin, TX) at 37°C for 30 min according to the manufacturer’s instructions of Turbo DNA-free kit. DNase-treated total RNA (5 μg) was used as starting material for double-stranded cDNA synthesis using Oligo(dT)18 primer and RevertAid™ First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (MBI Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Germany) according to the manual.

Microarrays and data analysis

Two biological samples of EZ were pooled. Three independent samples (representing 6 plants) of total RNA were prepared for whole-genome Affymetrix GeneChip microarray analysis. The quality of RNA was examined by MFTServices (Tübingen, Germany). WT-Ovation Pico RNA Amplification System (NuGen, San Carlos, CA) was used to amplify 50 ng total RNA to produce labeled cDNA. Six cDNA sets were hybridized to Poplar Genome Arrays (three arrays for LN and 3 arrays for HN plants) according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The microarray data set supporting the results of this article is available under the ArrayExpress accession number E-MTAB-1483, http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/experiments/E-MTAB-1483/. Gene expression analysis was performed with R Project software package, version 2.10.1 (http://www.R-project.org). cDNA Microarray data were normalized across the six arrays using Bioconductor - Robust Multiarray Averaging (RMA). Transcription levels of HN plants were compared to LN plants. Genes with var < 0.5 was removed. Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM) was performed to calculate p-values. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with fold change ≥ 2 and p-value ≤ 0.05 after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were annotated using Poparray (http://aspendb.uga.edu/poparray) for JGI poplar gene models and predicted Arabidopsis homologs. The differentially presented Gene Ontology (GO) categories were identified in Popgenie v3.0 (http://popgenie.org/) using the Analysis Tool GO enrichment. Enrichment analysis of MapMan categories [42] was conducted with Superviewer (http://bar.utoronto.ca/ntools/cgi-bin/ntools_classification_superviewer.cgi) calculating the mean and SD for 100 bootstraps of the input set (duplicates allowed) and the p of the hypergeometric distribution [43]. Gene coexpression relationships were calculated for the DEGs with the Analysis Tool PopNet in Popgenie v3.0 (http://popgenie.org/) with a display threshold of 7 and an expand threshold of 3. The coexpression analysis was based on microarray data from 21 experiments (GSE12152, GSE13109, GSE13990, GSE15242, GSE15595, GSE16420, GSE16459, GSE16495, GSE16786, GSE16888, GSE17223, GSE17225, GSE17226, GSE17230, GSE17804, GSE19279, GSE19467, GSE20061, GSE21061, GSE21171, GSE9673) which are studies using poplar and analyzing wood formation, growth, development, and the responses to nitrogen limitation and drought (http://popgenie.org/). Gene co-expression relationships were visualized in Cytoscape 3.1.1 [44]. Sub-clusters (= complexes) in networks were identified with Cytocluster applying the NonOverlapping algorithm and complex size threshold 3 (http://apps.cytoscape.org/apps/cytocluster).

Results

Nitrogen accelerates stem elongation and biomass production

P. trichocarpa plants were grown either without additional N (LN) or supplied with 5 mM NH4NO3 (HN). The fertilized poplars showed 1.4 times faster stem elongation rates than non-fertilized plants (Table 1) resulting in taller plants after 6 weeks of N treatment (Figure 1). N-induced growth stimulation also resulted in about 20% thicker stem diameter and almost doubled stem biomass compared to non-fertilized plants (Table 1). All stem tissues of HN poplars contained higher N concentrations than those of LN plants (Table 1).
Table 1

Growth, biomass and nitrogen concentrations of Populus trichocarpa

Parameter

LN

HN

P

Height increment (cm d−1 )

0.83 ± 0.02

1.16 ± 0.03

<0.001

Stem diameter (mm)

5.35 ± 0.15

6.40 ± 0.14

<0.001

Biomass of stem (g plant−1)

2.31 ± 0.09

4.06 ± 0.17

<0.001

Biomass of leaves (g plant−1)

4.43 ± 0.24

7.17 ± 0.35

<0.001

Biomass of roots (g plant−1)

1.45 ± 0.13

1.67 ± 0.24

0.215

Total biomass (g plant−1)

8.49 ± 0.43

13.26 ± 0.64

<0.001

N in EZ (%)

2.03 ± 0.08

3.70 ± 0.15

<0.001

N in developing xylem (%)

0.55 ± 0.03

1.59 ± 0.08

<0.001

N in wood (%)

0.18 ± 0.02

0.42 ± 0.10

0.033

N in bark (%)

0.38 ± 0.06

1.03 ± 0.16

0.004

Populus trichocarpa were grown under low (LN) and high (HN) nitrogen conditions. Data are means ± SE of 12 biological replicates. Independent two-sample t-tests were used to test the differences between the means of HN and LN plants. Height increment was determined during the period of N fertilization. Stem diameter and dry biomass were determined at plant harvest.

N-responsive stem elongation growth at the transcriptional level

To investigate the molecular basis of the N-accelerated elongation growth, transcriptome analyses were conducted in the EZ of HN and LN poplars. N fertilization resulted in 1037 differentially expressed genes (DEGs based on Populus v3Best Gene Models corresponding to 1208 Affymetrix IDs) with more than 2-fold significantly changed transcript levels in the EZ (Additional file 1: Table S1). GO term enrichment analysis revealed 24 significant Plant GO Slim categories for the N-responsive DEGs in the EZ (Table 2). From this list we deduced that processes related to cell wall formation were particularly prominent because we found GO terms related to “cell death” and “carbohydrate metabolism” in the category of biological processes and terms indicative for the extracellular compartment such as “cell wall”, “external encapsulating structure” and “proteinaceous extracellular matrix” in the category “cellular component”. In the category molecular function, the terms “kinase activity”, “signal transducer activity”, “RNA binding” and “receptor activity” pointed to signaling and transcriptional regulation as major activities in the EZ (Table 2).
Table 2

Significantly enriched gene ontology (GO) terms in the elongation zone of Populus trichocarpa

GO identity

Category

Description

P value (FDR)

ClusterFreq

TotalFreq

GO:0019538

P

protein metabolic process

<0.001

73/494

3727/14903

GO:0009987

P

cellular process

<0.001

227/494

8214/14903

GO:0006412

P

Translation

0.002

5/494

567/14903

GO:0006464

P

cellular protein modification process

0.003

47/494

2227/14903

GO:0008219

P

cell death

0.013

8/494

605/14903

GO:0016265

P

Death

0.013

8/494

605/14903

GO:0005975

P

carbohydrate metabolic process

0.018

50/494

998/14903

GO:0003824

F

catalytic activity

<0.001

401/618

10616/19350

GO:0005515

F

protein binding

<0.001

92/618

4123/19350

GO:0005198

F

structural molecule activity

<0.001

3/618

548/19350

GO:0005488

F

Binding

0.004

352/618

12290/19350

GO:0016301

F

kinase activity

0.011

46/618

2150/19350

GO:0003676

F

nucleic acid binding

0.017

72/618

3014/19350

GO:0000166

F

nucleotide binding

0.019

112/618

4388/19350

GO:0004871

F

signal transducer activity

0.023

5/618

448/19350

GO:0003723

F

RNA binding

0.035

6/618

461/19350

GO:0004872

F

receptor activity

0.060

3/618

298/19350

GO:0005840

C

Ribosome

0.004

2/162

469/6012

GO:0016020

C

Membrane

0.012

59/162

1584/6012

GO:0030312

C

external encapsulating structure

0.014

10/162

142/6012

GO:0005618

C

cell wall

0.014

10/162

142/6012

GO:0005576

C

extracellular region

0.025

5/162

52/6012

GO:0005622

C

Intracellular

0.026

17/162

1144/6012

GO:0005578

C

proteinaceous extracellular matrix

0.035

3/162

22/6012

Plant GOSlim terms were analyzed in Popgenie v3.0 (http://popgenie.org/) using the Analysis Tool GO enrichment (P value < 0.05, FDR adjusted). The input was the list of genes with significantly changed transcript levels in response to fertilization with 5 mM NH4NO3 for 1.5 month compared with non-fertilized plants. GO terms are indicated for biological processes (P), molecular functions (F) and cellular components (C). ClusterFreq and TotalFreq indicate the number of genes for a GO term found in the sample set and in the total genome, respectively.

An N-responsive gene network in the elongation zone

To find key pathways for the N regulation of elongation growth, the 1037 N-responsive DEGs in the EZ of the poplar stem were investigated with the PopNet tool in Popgenie v3.0. This analysis resulted in an N-responsive network with 392 nodes (= genes) connected by 1863 edges (= significant co-expression relationships) (Additional file 2: Table S2, Additional file 3: Figure S1). When the network was dissected into its subclusters, fourteen complexes (subclusters) were obtained. While most of these complexes were small consisting only of 3 to 12 nodes that were connected by 2 to 23 edges, three main complexes were retrieved: complex 1 (92 nodes, 364 edges), complex 2 (57 nodes, 740 edges) and complex 3 (54 nodes, 547 edges) (Figure 2). These complexes were also clearly apparent in the original network, in which complex 2 and complex 3 were connected through complex 1 (Additional file 3: Figure S1).
Figure 2

Three main complexes of an N-responsive network in the elongation zone of P . trichocarpa. Gene-gene relationships were obtained in Popgenie v3.0 (http://popgenie.org/) using the PopNet tool. The network was visualized in Cytoscape.

The clustering coefficients of complex 2 (0.73) and complex 3 (0.82) were higher than that of complex 3 (0.51) (Table 3). Average connectivity of a node in the complex 2 and complex 3 were more than 20 neighbours, while about 8 neighbours were present for a node in complex 1 (Table 3). A histogram of the edges per node revealed the maximum numbers of genes in the class of 21 to 30 for complex 2 and 31 to 40 edges for complex 3 underpinning the strong connectivity of these complexes (Figure 3). In complex 1 the highest node connectivity was 21 to 30 edges per node, but the maximum number of nodes was in the category with the lowest connectivity (1 to 5 edges per node) (Figure 3). The genes with the highest connectivity included a homolog to PAD4, a lipase involved in plant immune response and fitness [45] in complex 1 (26 edges), a scarcely defined nucleotide binding protein with functions in chloroplast metabolism [46] in complex 2 (48 edges) and a cellulose synthase [47] in complex 3 (37 edges) (Additional file 4: Table S3).
Table 3

Network characteristics of three identified main complexes

Parameter

Complex 1

Complex 2

Complex 3

Clustering coefficient

0.51

0.73

0.82

Net diameter

7

3

4

Net radius

4

2

2

Net centrality

0.20

0.41

0.41

Shortest path

8372

3192

2862

Characteristic path length

2.85

1.56

1.80

Mean number of neighbors

7.9

26.0

20.3

Nodes

92

57

54

Net density

0.09

0.46

0.38

Net heterogeneity

0.74

0.46

0.63

Edges

364

740

547

Number of Arabidopsis matches in the nodes

90

57

52

Networks were generated in Popgenie v3.0 (http://popgenie.org/) with the significantly regulated genes in the elongation zone of P. trichocarpa. Network parameters were calculated with Cytoscape.

Figure 3

Histogram of the number of neighbors for the genes in the main complexes of an N-responsive gene network in the elongation zone of P . trichocarpa. The histogram classifies the number of edges in the three complexes and revealed differences for the distribution of genes in complex 1 compared with complex 2 or complex 3.

To investigate whether the three complexes represent functional units we conducted Mapman analyses for the genes in each complex. A total of 14 significant categories for the DEGs in complex 1, complex 2 and complex 3 of the N-responsive network were identified (Figure 4). Complex 1 was enriched in the categories “hormone metabolism”, mainly because of several auxin-related genes, and further genes related to other plant growth hormones (gibberellin-, jasmonate- brassinosteroide- and ethylene-related genes), “development” (NAC factors ANAC047 and ANAC061, Late embryogenesis abundant hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein family), “RNA” with transcription factors related to stress and development (WRKY18, WRKY26, WRKY33, WRKY40, HB07), “stress”, mainly with drought stress-related genes such as DREB, OSMOTIN, DnaJ, PAD4, ZAT10)” and “transport” (nucleotide-sugar transporter, ABC type transporters and amino acid transporters) (Figure 4, Additional file 2: Table S2).
Figure 4

Significantly enriched and depleted MapMan categories in the main complexes of an N-responsive gene network in the elongation zone of P . trichocarpa. Genes identified in main complexes of the N-responsive network of the poplar elongation zone were assigned to the best Arabidopsis matches (AGI numbers) using Poparray (http://aspendb.uga.edu/poparray) and categorized with Superviewer. Data are means ± SD for 100 bootstraps of the initial data set. Stars indicate: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Both complex 1 and complex 3 were enriched in the category “cell wall”, but with genes indicating divergent functions in the two complexes. In complex 1, genes encoding proteins for hemicellulose and pectin metabolism were enriched (e.g. arabinogalactan protein 26, SNF1-related protein kinase, β-xylosidase 1, xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase 15, xyloglucan endotransglycosylase 6, expansin). In complex 3, “cell wall” and “secondary metabolism” genes typically involved in the formation of cellulose (cellulose synthases IRX1, IRX 3, IRX5) and phenolic compounds including lignin (peroxidases, laccases, pinoresinol reductase) such as, IRX 6, IRX 8, IRX 9, IRX 12, IRX 15, and related transcription factors MYB46 and MYB56 were overrepresented (Figure 4, Additional file 2: Table S2).

Complex 2 showed a compositional pattern that differed strongly from complex 1 and 3 with significant enrichments in the categories “photosynthesis” (some nuclear encoded genes for light reaction and Calvin cycle)”, “co-factor and vitamin metabolism” (thiazole and thiamin production) and “fermentation” (aldehyde dehydrogenase) (Figure 4). It was furthermore notable that most of the DEGs in complex 2 were suppressed, whereas those in the complexes 1 and 3 showed in increased transcript abundance. Counting of chloroplasts in selected areas of the cross sections suggested that the suppression of photosynthetic genes was not linked with a reduction in the number of chloroplasts (35 ± 13 chloroplasts per 1000 μm2 and 27 ± 12 chloroplasts per 1000 μm2 , P = 0.220) in HN compared with LN poplars.

N fertilization increases the concentrations of lignin and phenolic compounds in the poplar elongation zone

Because genes related to secondary metabolism were overrepresented in complex 3, we tested whether the concentrations of lignin or soluble phenolic concentrations differed between the EZ from HN and LN poplars. The EZ of HN poplars contained higher concentrations of lignin and phenolics than that of LN poplars (Table 4). Cross sections that were stained for lignin supported an increased production of primary xylem with strong incorporation of lignin and secondary compounds in HN grown poplars compared with LN poplars (Figure 5).
Table 4

Chemical and anatomical characteristics of stem tissues of P. trichocarpa grown without (LN) or with nitrogen fertilization (HN) for 1.5 months

Tissue

Parameter

LN

HN

p

EZ

Lignin (%)

17.61 ± 1.50

21.28 ± 0.78

0.037

 

Soluble phenolics (μg mg−1)

5.96 ± 0.52

7.89 ± 0.54

0.022

 

Lumen per vessel (μm2)

189.0 ± 13.0

478.1 ± 32.9

<0.001

 

Cell wall thickness of vessels (μm)

1.80 ± 0.15

2.20 ± 0.13

0.021

 

FW/DW

5.10 ± 0.18

5.51 ± 0.06

0.035

Developing Xylem

Lignin (%)

11.43 ± 1.02

8.45 ± 1.33

0.063

 

Soluble phenolics (μg mg−1)

0.86 ± 0.13

0.55 ± 0.08

0.045

 

Lumen per vessel (μm2)

221.0 ± 32.5

600.6 ± 51.2

0.008

 

Cell wall thickness of vessels (μm)

1.89 ± 0.12

1.74 ± 0.14

0.212

 

FW/DW

3.15 ± 0.42

5.17 ± 0.24

0.003

Wood

Lignin (%)

24.55 ± 1.67

21.89 ± 1.39

0.134

 

FW/DW

2.23 ± 0.09

2.45 ± 0.12

0.100

 

Vessel lumen area (μm2)

940.7 ± 53.0

1459.6 ± 81.1

<0.001

 

Fiber double wall thickness (μm)

4.36 ± 1.32

3.44 ± 1.38

<0.001

Data are mean ± SE of 5 biological replicates. Independent two-sample t-tests were used to test the differences between the means for HN and LN plants. FW/DW = dry to fresh mass ratio.

Figure 5

Cross sections of the elongation zone of P . trichocarpa in response to low nitrogen (A, C) and high nitrogen (B, D) supply. Lignin staining (A, B) of cross sections (50 μm thickness); autofluorescence of phenolics (C, D) in cross sections (10 μm thickness). The cross sections were taken in the second internode counted from the stem apex. The scale bars correspond to 50 μm.

This finding was surprising because previous studies reported decreased lignin concentrations in wood of poplars grown with high N supply [34]-[36]. Therefore, we also determined lignin and soluble phenolics in lower stem parts. In concordance with earlier studies, we found decreased concentrations of lignin and phenolics in the developing xylem (Table 4). In wood from the lower stem segment, the differences were not significant, but those tissues had mainly been formed before the N treatment started. The autofluorescence of phenolics and lignin staining of the cross sections in the area of secondary wood formation supported the biochemical analyses and indicated reduced or delayed incorporation of secondary metabolites into the cell walls of the HN poplars (Figure 6).
Figure 6

Cross sections of in zone of secondary wood formation in stems of P . trichocarpa in response to low nitrogen (A, C) and high nitrogen (B, D) supply. Lignin staining (A, B) of cross sections (50 μm thickness); autofluorescence of phenolics (C, D) in cross sections (10 μm thickness). The cross sections were taken in the second internode counted from the stem bottom. The scale bars correspond to 50 μm.

The linkage of N metabolism genes and N-responsive network

High N supply increased the N concentrations in all stem tissues including the EZ (Table 1). Still, “N metabolism” was not identified as a significant Mapman or GO term, but the term “amino acid metabolism” was significantly enriched on the basis of all DEGs (Additional file 2: Table S2). The list of N-related DEGs also contained nitrate reductase PtNIA2.2 (Potri.005G172400), nitrite reductase PtNIR1.1 (Potri.004G140800), various transporters for N-containing cargo [high affinity nitrate transporter PtNRT2.7 (Potri.001G348300), ammonium transporter PtAMT1-6 (Potri.009G045200), three amino acid transporters (Potri.010G226000, PtAAT1.1 (Potri.012G131300), PtLHT1.2 (Potri.001G335300), amino acid permease (Potri.003G103600)]. Among these genes, four were present in complex 1, of which two amino acid transporters (PtAAT1.1, PtLHT1.2) and a biosynthetic gene encoding a lysine-ketoglutarate reductase/saccharopine dehydrogenase (Potri.006G134200) were up-regulated, while a putative chorismate/shikimate dehydrogenase (Potri.014G135500) was down-regulated. Overall, the transcript abundances of the majority of the N-related genes (15/22) were decreased under HN compared with LN conditions (Additional file 2: Table S2).

Discussion

N-responsive cell wall formation in the poplar elongation zone

N plays a role as a signal to regulate plant gene expression for growth and development [48],[49]. Changes in N availability are sensed by plants rapidly in time scales of minutes to days [50],[51]. Therefore, the differences reported in the current study reflect alterations in the physiological status of long-term HN and LN acclimated plants. In agreement with previous studies [30]-[32],[35],[36] P. trichocarpa showed faster elongation of the upper stem internodes as well as increased radial growth at the stem base under HN compared with LN conditions. Furthermore, the anatomical alterations in response to high N in the wood were similar to those observed in previous studies, such as thinner cell walls, wider vessel lumina and decreased lignin staining intensity [30]-[33],[35],[36] corresponding to the negative correlation of growth and lignin [52]. An unexpected finding of our study was that the EZ of HN poplars contained increased concentrations of soluble phenolics and lignin as well as thicker cell walls compared with LN poplars. Apparently, during primary elongation growth the influence of high N on xylary elements is reversed compared to that during secondary growth. This notable result was supported by the identification of an underlying gene network. The network contained a tightly co-regulated subnet (complex 3) that was enriched in genes known to be involved in secondary cell wall formation. In addition to master regulators of secondary cell wall formation such as MYB46 and MYB103 [7], it integrated genes for cellulose synthase, for hemicellulose formation as well as laccases and peroxidases required for lignification. Moreover, complex 3 encompassed about one-third of the genes denominated as “core xylem gene set” in Arabidopsis [53] and contained various genes found to be preferentially expressed during secondary wall formation in wood of P. tomentosa [54]. In contrast to the remarkable overlap with the genes for secondary cell wall formation, we found only one common gene between complex 3 and the N-regulated genes earlier identified in the developing xylem of Populus trichocarpa × deltoides ([36], Additional file 5: Table S4). This observation further supports divergent regulation of cell formation in the EZ and the developing xylem that might have led to the striking differences in cell wall anatomy and biochemistry.

Although the overlap with complex 3 was low, we found that about 13% of the genes identified in the developing xylem of HN poplars by Plavcová et al. [36] (Additional file 5: Table S4) were also present in our total DEG list, including for example the aquaporin TIP1;3 and genes for amino acid metabolism. Plavcová et al. [36] speculated that enhanced aquaporin expression may be required for increased water uptake as a precondition to drive the strong expansion of the vessel lumina under high N. In concordance with this suggestion we found that the EZ of HN poplars contained higher water content and strongly enlarged vessel lumina compared with LN poplars.

In our study, the identified cell wall-related complex 3 may be considered as a “hub” because of its high connectivity. Hubs may constitute regulatory units [55]. Therefore, we inspected potential regulatory genes in complex 3 with connectivity to cell wall-related genes. In this context, PtARAC2.1, a poplar homolog to AtRAC2/ROP7 was most notable. In Arabidopsis, the expression of AtRAC2/ROP7 is developmentally limited to the late stages of xylem differentiation and coincides with the formation of secondary cell walls [56]. The AtRAC2/ROP7 promoter directs highly xylem-specific expression in Arabidopsis. In our subnet, PtARAC2.1 (AtRAC2/ROP7, AT5G45970) had 32 edges and was highly connected with cell wall-related genes including three fasciclin-like genes (PtFLA11.1, PtFLA14.7, PtFLA14.8); four cellulose synthases [PtCESA.2 (CESA8), Potri.002G257900 (CESA4), Potri.018G103900 (CESA7), Potri.011G069600 (CESA8)], genes for hemicellulose and xylan biosynthesis [Potri.006G131000 (IRX9), Potri.016G086400 (IRX9); Potri.003G100200 (PRR1)], lignin formation [Potri.016G112000 (LAC4)] and regulation [Potri.008G094700 (KLCR2); Potri.015G060100 (COBL4)]. All these genes were up-regulated in the EZ of HN compared with LN plants. PtARAC2.1 is also present in the list of the “core xylem gene set” [53] and, thus, is a promising candidate to uncover the regulation of cell wall formation in poplar. Overall, the massive transcriptional regulation of regulatory and biosynthetic plant cell wall genes in the EZ suggests that high N supply initiates differences in cell wall formation at an early developmental stage.

N-driven elongation growth is under stress

Our results revealed a co-expressed gene cluster (complex 1) with functional annotations for transcription factors, development, cell walls, stress and transport in the EZ of HN poplars. This complex apparently integrated processes of primary steps in cell wall formation (pectin) and phytohormone-regulated growth. For example, the observed enhancement of auxin-related gene transcript levels supports activation of cell division and enlargement in response to N. However, we also detected genes required for jasmonate biosynthesis and signalling (homologs to JAR1, JAZ5, MYC2). This was unexpected because jasmonate production is a response to wounding or herbivorous insects [57] and can induce plant stunting [58]. Growth exerts a strain on the enlarging tissues [59]. During extension growth the primary xylary elements are ruptured. We speculate that these processes may cause intrinsic lesions that could stimulate defence responses.

It was also conspicuous that WRKY26 and WRKY33 (regulation of heat-induced ethylene-dependent response of Arabidopsis [60]), WRKY18 (activated downstream of a MAPK signalling pathway responding to pathogens [61],[62]) and WRKY40 (responses to abscisic acid (ABA) and abiotic stress [63]) were up-regulated. In concert with elevated transcript levels of a putative chitinase (CHIV), PAD4, PR4, OSMOTIN 34 and the chaperone-like DnaJ family gene, these findings suggest that N-induced growth imposes stress on the tissues.

N metabolism in the stem elongation zone

Nitrate reductase (NIA2), nitrite reductase (NIR) and the nitrate receptor/transporter NRT1.1 are considered as sentinels of the nitrate response [64]. In poplar tissues PtNRT1.1 has a low expression and therefore, cannot reliably be detected on microarrays [65]. Its expression is decreased under HN in the poplar EZ [66]. The expression of further poplar N-related genes PtNIA2.2, PtNIR1.1 and Potri.001G348300 (AtNRT2.7) were suppressed, whereas several putative amino acids transporter were up-regulated in the EZ. This observation suggests that N assimilation does not play a major role in the EZ and suggests that the supply of the tissue is mainly achieved by the translocation and uptake of amino acids. Amino acids, mainly glutamine, are the principle long distance transport forms of nitrogen in poplars [27]. In the EZ we found increased expression of PtLHT1.2, a homolog to Arabidopsis LHT1 (LYSINE HISTIDINE TRANSPORTER1). AtLHT1 is a master switch directing the partitioning of glutamine during defence responses [67]. Here, PtLHT1.2 was co-expressed with the WRKY18 and WRKY26 homologs, PtAAT1.1 (AAA-type ATPase), Potri.016G071600 (late embryogenesis abundant protein) and PtIFS1.42 (cytochrome P450, a putative gene of the brassinosteroid metabolism). This gene cluster could therefore coordinate growth processes with amino acid requirement. The molecular cross talk between these co-expressed genes remains still enigmatic. Further studies are needed to elucidate the causal links between N metabolites, their transport and growth regulation.

N assimilation takes mainly place in mature leaves, because it requires reducing power and carbon skeletons from photosynthesis as precursors for amino acid biosynthesis. It has often been reported that nitrogen and photosynthesis are positively related [68]-[70]. Contrary, N starvation generally resulted in decreased transcript levels of photosynthesis gene expression in Arabidopsis shoots [51]. It was, therefore, unexpected that genes for light reactions and the Calvin cycle were collectively suppressed in the EZ of HN plants (complex 2). Young stems are photosynthetically active [71],[72], but the EZ is a sink tissue. Sink tissue rely on the import of carbohydrates and amino acids and respiration is stronger than photosynthesis [73]. This may be a reason why the photosynthetic genes were collectively suppressed in complex 2 of the EZ, whereas generally positive relationships between N supply and the expression of photosynthetic genes and photosynthetic activity exist [51].

Conclusions

In the present study, we have identified genes involved in N-driven stem elongation growth in P. trichocarpa. Co-expression analysis extracted a network of DEGs with functional annotations to hormone metabolism, stress, transport, cell wall, and photosynthesis. The network uncovered three main complexes that represented functional units: Complex 1 integrated growth processes and stress suggesting that genes which have well established functions in abiotic and biotic stress are also recruited to coordinate growth strain. Complex 2 was enriched in genes with decreased transcript abundance and functionally annotated as photosynthetic hub. This finding underpins the complex relationship between photosynthetic processes and nitrogen. Complex 3 was identified as a hub for secondary cell formation because it connected well-known master regulators of secondary cell walls (e.g. MYB46) with genes related to the formation of cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin and phenolics. Anatomical and biochemical analysis confirmed that N-driven growth resulted in early secondary cell wall formation in the elongation zone. In contrast to the EZ, secondary xylem at the stem base formed thinner cell walls with less lignin with high N supply. These results suggest that the influence of high N on cell wall deposition in xylary elements is reversed or shifted between secondary to primary growth. This finding may have practical implications because a reduction of the cellulose-to-lignin-ratio in the secondary xylem due to N fertilization affects the usability and economic value of wood as feedstock for biofuel production [3]. An important goal of future studies will be to elucidate the nitrogen-related regulation of the cell wall hub. This knowledge may open new perspectives on sustainable fertilization without negative consequences for wood composition.

Availability of supporting data

The data sets supporting the results in this article are available in this article, in the additional files and in the ArrayExpress repository with the accession number E-MTAB-1483 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/experiments/E-MTAB-1483/).

Additional files

Abbreviations

ABA: 

Abscisic acid

DEG: 

Differentially expressed genes

EZ: 

Elongation zone

GO: 

Gene Ontology

HN: 

High nitrogen

JA: 

Jasmonic acid

JGI: 

The Joint Genome Institute

LN: 

Low nitrogen

N: 

Nitrogen

RMA: 

Robust Multiarray Averaging

SD: 

Standard deviation

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Chanaka Mannapperuma from PopGenIE Team (SLU, Umea, Sweden) for making numerical data of our analysis available that were not automatically accessible through the POPGenie homepage. We thank Thomas Klein (Laboratory for Radioisotopes, University of Göttingen), Marianne Smiatacz (University of Göttingen) and Christine Kettner (University of Göttingen) for excellent technical assistance. We are grateful to the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) for funding PhD scholarships (DE and HB) and to the BMBF (Germany) for financial support of the project ÖL4 in the program BEST. The publication fund of the University of Göttingen and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft supported open access publication of this article.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Forest Botany and Tree Physiology, Georg-August Universität Göttingen

References

  1. Sannigrahi P, Ragauskas AJ, Tuskan GA: Poplar as a feedstock for biofuels: A review of compositional characteristics. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefining. 2010, 4: 209-226. 10.1002/bbb.206.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Mansfield SD, Kang K-Y, Chapple C: Designed for deconstruction–poplar trees altered in cell wall lignification improve the efficacy of bioethanol production. New Phytol. 2012, 194: 91-101. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.04031.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Polle A, Janz D, Teichmann T, Lipka V: Poplar genetic engineering: promoting desirable wood characteristics and pest resistance. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013, 97 (13): 5669-10.1007/s00253-013-4940-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hertzberg M, Aspeborg H, Schrader J, Andersson A, Erlandsson R, Blomqvist K, Bhalerao R, Uhlen M, Teeri TT, Lundeberg J, Sundberg B, Nilsson P, Sandberg G: A transcriptional roadmap to wood formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98: 14732-14737. 10.1073/pnas.261293398.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Schrader J, Nilsson J, Mellerowicz E, Berglund A, Nilsson P, Hertzberg M, Sandberg G: A high-resolution transcript profile across the wood-forming meristem of poplar identifies potential regulators of cambial stem cell identity. Plant Cell. 2004, 16: 2278-2292. 10.1105/tpc.104.024190.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Goué N, Lesage-Descauses M-C, Mellerowicz EJ, Magel E, Label P, Sundberg B: Microgenomic analysis reveals cell type-specific gene expression patterns between ray and fusiform initials within the cambial meristem of Populus . New Phytol. 2008, 180: 45-56. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02556.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Schuetz M, Smith R, Ellis B: Xylem tissue specification, patterning, and differentiation mechanisms. J Exp Bot. 2013, 64: 11-31. 10.1093/jxb/ers287.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chai G, Qi G, Cao Y, Wang Z, Yu L, Tang X, Yu Y, Wang D, Kong Y, Zhou G: Poplar PdC3H17 and PdC3H18 are direct targets of PdMYB3 and PdMYB21, and positively regulate secondary wall formation in Arabidopsis and poplar. New Phytol. 2014, 203: 520-534. 10.1111/nph.12825.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Song D, Sun J, Li L: Diverse roles of PtrDUF579 proteins in Populus and PtrDUF579-1 function in vascular cambium proliferation during secondary growth. Plant Mol Biol. 2014, 85: 601-612. 10.1007/s11103-014-0206-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Popko J, Hänsch R, Mendel R-R, Polle A, Teichmann T: The role of abscisic acid and auxin in the response of poplar to abiotic stress. Plant Biol. 2010, 12: 242-258. 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00305.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Demura T, Fukuda H: Transcriptional regulation in wood formation. Trends Plant Sci. 2007, 12: 64-70. 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.12.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhong R, Ye Z-H: Regulation of cell wall biosynthesis. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007, 10: 564-572. 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.09.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhong R, Lee C, Ye Z-H: Global analysis of direct targets of secondary wall NAC master switches in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant. 2010, 3: 1087-1103. 10.1093/mp/ssq062.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Wang H-Z, Dixon RA: On–off switches for secondary cell wall biosynthesis. Mol Plant. 2011, 5 (2): 297-303. 10.1093/mp/ssr098.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Groß-Hardt R, Laux T: Stem cell regulation in the shoot meristem. J Cell Sci. 2003, 116: 1659-1666. 10.1242/jcs.00406.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Furuta KM, Hellmann E, Helariutta Y: Molecular control of cell specification and cell differentiation during procambial development. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2014, 65: 607-638. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040306.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mayer KF, Schoof H, Haecker A, Lenhard M, Jürgens G, Laux T: Role of WUSCHEL in regulating stem cell fate in the Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Cell. 1998, 95: 805-815. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81703-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Barton MK, Poethig RS: Formation of the shoot apical meristem in Arabidopsis thaliana: an analysis of development in the wild type and in the shoot meristemless mutant. Development. 1993, 119: 823-831.Google Scholar
  19. Scofield S, Murray JAH: KNOX gene function in plant stem cell niches. Plant Mol Biol. 2006, 60: 929-946. 10.1007/s11103-005-4478-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Shani E, Yanai O, Ori N: The role of hormones in shoot apical meristem function. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006, 9: 484-489. 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.07.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Yamaguchi M, Ohtani M, Mitsuda N, Kubo M, Ohme-Takagi M, Fukuda H, Demura T: VND-INTERACTING2, a NAC domain transcription factor, negatively regulates xylem vessel formation in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell. 2010, 22: 1249-1263. 10.1105/tpc.108.064048.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhong R, Richardson EA, Ye Z-H: The MYB46 transcription factor is a direct target of SND1 and regulates secondary wall biosynthesis in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell Online. 2007, 19: 2776-2792. 10.1105/tpc.107.053678.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhong R, Lee C, Zhou J, McCarthy RL, Ye Z-H: A battery of transcription factors involved in the regulation of secondary cell wall biosynthesis in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell Online. 2008, 20: 2763-2782. 10.1105/tpc.108.061325.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Ko J-H, Kim W-C, Han K-H: Ectopic expression of MYB46 identifies transcriptional regulatory genes involved in secondary wall biosynthesis in Arabidopsis . Plant J. 2009, 60: 649-665. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03989.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. McCarthy RL, Zhong R, Ye Z-H: MYB83 is a direct target of SND1 and acts redundantly with MYB46 in the regulation of secondary cell wall biosynthesis in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50: 1950-1964. 10.1093/pcp/pcp139.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhong R, Ye Z-H: MYB46 and MYB83 bind to the SMRE sites and directly activate a suite of transcription factors and secondary wall biosynthetic genes. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012, 53: 368-380. 10.1093/pcp/pcr185.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rennenberg H, Wildhagen H, Ehlting B: Nitrogen nutrition of poplar trees. Plant Biol Stuttg Ger. 2010, 12: 275-291. 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00309.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Cooke JEK, Weih M: Nitrogen storage and seasonal nitrogen cycling in Populus: bridging molecular physiology and ecophysiology. New Phytol. 2005, 167: 19-30. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01451.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Coleman M, Tolsted D, Nichols T, Johnson WD, Wene EG, Houghtaling T: Post-establishment fertilization of Minnesota hybrid poplar plantations. Biomass Bioenergy. 2006, 30: 740-749. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2006.01.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Luo ZB, Langenfeld-Heyser R, Calfapietra C, Polle A: Influence of free air CO2 enrichment (EUROFACE) and nitrogen fertilisation on the anatomy of juvenile wood of three poplar species after coppicing. Trees-Struct Funct. 2005, 19: 109-118. 10.1007/s00468-004-0369-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Luo Z-B, Calfapietra C, Scarascia-Mugnozza G, Liberloo M, Polle A: Carbon-based secondary metabolites and internal nitrogen pools in Populus nigra under Free Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) and nitrogen fertilisation. Plant Soil. 2008, 304: 45-57. 10.1007/s11104-007-9518-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Novaes E, Osorio L, Drost DR, Miles BL, Boaventura-Novaes CRD, Benedict C, Dervinis C, Yu Q, Sykes R, Davis M, Martin TA, Peter GF, Kirst M: Quantitative genetic analysis of biomass and wood chemistry of Populus under different nitrogen levels. New Phytol. 2009, 182: 878-890. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02785.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hacke UG, Plavcová L, Almeida-Rodriguez A, King-Jones S, Zhou W, Cooke JE: Influence of nitrogen fertilization on xylem traits and aquaporin expression in stems of hybrid poplar. Tree Physiol. 2010, 30: 1016-1025. 10.1093/treephys/tpq058.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Pitre FE, Lafarguette F, Boyle B, Pavy N, Caron S, Dallaire N, Poulin P-L, Ouellet M, Morency M-J, Wiebe N, Lim EL, Urbain A, Mouille G, Cooke JEK, Mackay JJ: High nitrogen fertilization and stem leaning have overlapping effects on wood formation in poplar but invoke largely distinct molecular pathways. Tree Physiol. 2010, 30: 1273-1289. 10.1093/treephys/tpq073.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Euring D, Löfke C, Teichmann T, Polle A: Nitrogen fertilization has differential effects on N allocation and lignin in two Populus species with contrasting ecology. Trees. 2012, 26: 1933-1942. 10.1007/s00468-012-0761-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Plavcová L, Hacke UG, Almeida-Rodriguez AM, Li E, Douglas CJ: Gene expression patterns underlying changes in xylem structure and function in response to increased nitrogen availability in hybrid poplar. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36: 186-199. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02566.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Janz D, Lautner S, Wildhagen H, Behnke K, Schnitzler J-P, Rennenberg H, Fromm J, Polle A: Salt stress induces the formation of a novel type of “pressure wood” in two Populus species. New Phytol. 2012, 194: 129-141. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03975.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Teichmann T, Bolu-Arianto WH, Olbrich A, Langenfeld-Heyser R, Göbel C, Grzeganek P, Feussner I, Hänsch R, Polle A: GH3::GUS reflects cell-specific developmental patterns and stress-induced changes in wood anatomy in the poplar stem. Tree Physiol. 2008, 28: 1305-1315. 10.1093/treephys/28.9.1305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Vallet C, Chabbert B, Czaninski Y, Monties B: Histochemistry of lignin deposition during sclerenchyma differentiation in alfalfa stems. Ann Bot. 1996, 78: 625-632. 10.1006/anbo.1996.0170.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Brinkmann K, Blaschke L, Polle A: Comparison of different methods for lignin determination as a basis for calibration of near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy and implications of lignoproteins. J Chem Ecol. 2002, 28: 2483-2501. 10.1023/A:1021484002582.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Chang S, Puryear J, Cairney J: A simple and efficient method for isolating RNA from pine trees. Plant Mol Biol Report. 1993, 11: 113-116. 10.1007/BF02670468.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Thimm O, Bläsing O, Gibon Y, Nagel A, Meyer S, Krüger P, Selbig J, Müller LA, Rhee SY, Stitt M: Mapman: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J. 2004, 37: 914-939. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02016.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Provart N, Zhu T: A browser-based functional classification SuperViewer for Arabidopsis genomics. Curr Comput Mol Biol. 2003, 2003: 271-272.Google Scholar
  44. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T: Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13: 2498-2504. 10.1101/gr.1239303.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Wituszynska W, Slesak I, Vanderauwera S, Szechynska-Hebda M, Kornas A, Van Der Kelen K, Mühlenbock P, Karpinska B, Mackowski S, Van Breusegem F, Karpinski S: Lesion simulating disease1, enhanced disease susceptibility1, and phytoalexin deficient4 conditionally regulate cellular signaling homeostasis, photosynthesis, water use efficiency, and seed yield in Arabidopsis . Plant Physiol. 2013, 161: 1795-1805. 10.1104/pp.112.208116.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Kleffmann T, Russenberger D, von Zychlinski A, Christopher W, Sjölander K, Gruissem W, Baginsky S: The Arabidopsis chloroplast proteome reveals pathway abundance and novel protein functions. Curr Biol. 2004, 14: 354-362. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.02.039.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Liu Y, Xu F, Gou J, Al-Haddad J, Telewski FW, Bae H-J, Joshi CP: Importance of two consecutive methionines at the N-terminus of a cellulose synthase (PtdCesA8A) for normal wood cellulose synthesis in aspen. Tree Physiol. 2012, 32: 1403-1412. 10.1093/treephys/tps096.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Sakakibara H: Nitrate-specific and cytokinin-mediated nitrogen signaling pathways in plants. J Plant Res. 2003, 116: 253-257. 10.1007/s10265-003-0097-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Ho C-H, Lin S-H, Hu H-C, Tsay Y-F: CHL1 functions as a nitrate sensor in plants. Cell. 2009, 138: 1184-10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Krouk G, Crawford NM, Coruzzi GM, Tsay Y-F: Nitrate signaling: adaptation to fluctuating environments. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010, 13: 266-273. 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.12.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Krapp A, Berthomé R, Orsel M, Mercey-Boutet S, Yu A, Castaings L, Elftieh S, Major H, Renou J-P, Daniel-Vedele F: Arabidopsis roots and shoots show distinct temporal adaptation patterns toward nitrogen starvation. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157: 1255-1282. 10.1104/pp.111.179838.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Novaes E, Kirst M, Chiang V, Winter-Sederoff H, Sederoff R: Lignin and biomass: a negative correlation for wood formation and lignin content in trees. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154: 555-561. 10.1104/pp.110.161281.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Ko J-H, Beers EP, Han K-H: Global comparative transcriptome analysis identifies gene network regulating secondary xylem development in Arabidopsis thaliana . Mol Genet Genomics MGG. 2006, 276: 517-531. 10.1007/s00438-006-0157-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Yang X, Li X, Li B, Zhang D: Identification of genes differentially expressed in shoot apical meristems and in mature xylem of Populus tomentosa . Plant Mol Biol Report. 2014, 32: 452-464. 10.1007/s11105-013-0660-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhu X, Gerstein M, Snyder M: Getting connected: analysis and principles of biological networks. Genes Dev. 2007, 21: 1010-1024. 10.1101/gad.1528707.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Brembu T, Winge P, Bones AM: The small GTPase AtRAC2/ROP7 is specifically expressed during late stages of xylem differentiation in Arabidopsis . J Exp Bot. 2005, 56: 2465-2476. 10.1093/jxb/eri239.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Herde M, Koo AJK, Howe GA: Elicitation of jasmonate-mediated defense responses by mechanical wounding and insect herbivory. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2013, 1011: 51-61. 10.1007/978-1-62703-414-2_5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhang YI, Turner JG: Wound-induced endogenous jasmonates stunt plant growth by inhibiting mitosis. PLoS One. 2008, 3: e3699-10.1371/journal.pone.0003699.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Archer RR, et al: Growth stresses and strains in trees. 1st ed. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1987.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Li S, Fu Q, Chen L, Huang W, Yu D: Arabidopsis thaliana WRKY25, WRKY26, and WRKY33 coordinate induction of plant thermotolerance. Planta. 2011, 233: 1237-1252. 10.1007/s00425-011-1375-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Asai T, Tena G, Plotnikova J, Willmann MR, Chiu W-L, Gomez-Gomez L, Boller T, Ausubel FM, Sheen J: MAP kinase signalling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Nature. 2002, 415: 977-983. 10.1038/415977a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Xu X, Chen C, Fan B, Chen Z: Physical and functional interactions between pathogen-induced Arabidopsis WRKY18, WRKY40, and WRKY60 transcription factors. Plant Cell Online. 2006, 18: 1310-1326. 10.1105/tpc.105.037523.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Chen H, Lai Z, Shi J, Xiao Y, Chen Z, Xu X: Roles of Arabidopsis WRKY18, WRKY40 and WRKY60 transcription factors in plant responses to abscisic acid and abiotic stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10: 281-10.1186/1471-2229-10-281.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Krouk G, Mirowski P, LeCun Y, Shasha DE, Coruzzi GM: Predictive network modeling of the high-resolution dynamic plant transcriptome in response to nitrate. Genome Biol. 2010, 11: R123-10.1186/gb-2010-11-12-r123.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Bai H, Euring D, Volmer K, Janz D, Polle A: The nitrate transporter (NRT) gene family in poplar. PLoS One. 2013, 8: e72126-10.1371/journal.pone.0072126.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Bai H, et al: Transcription patterns of NRT family genes and ecophysiological response to nitrate fertilization and drought in poplar. Thesis, Göttingen: Cuvillier; 2014.Google Scholar
  67. Liu G, Ji Y, Bhuiyan NH, Pilot G, Selvaraj G, Zou J, Wei Y: Amino acid homeostasis modulates salicylic acid-associated redox status and defense responses in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell. 2010, 22: 3845-3863. 10.1105/tpc.110.079392.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Nilsen ET: Partitioning growth and photosynthesis between leaves and stems during nitrogen limitation in Spartium junceum . Am J Bot. 1992, 79: 1217-1223. 10.2307/2445047.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Ibrahim L, Proe MF, Cameron AD: Main effects of nitrogen supply and drought stress upon whole-plant carbon allocation in poplar. Can J For Res. 1997, 27: 1413-1419. 10.1139/x97-080.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Ripullone F, Grassi G, Lauteri M, Borghetti M: Photosynthesis–nitrogen relationships: interpretation of different patterns between Pseudotsuga menziesii and Populus × euroamericana in a mini-stand experiment. Tree Physiol. 2003, 23: 137-144. 10.1093/treephys/23.2.137.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Smith SD, Osmond CB: Stem photosynthesis in a desert ephemeral, Eriogonum inflatum. Oecologia. 1987, 72: 533-541. 10.1007/BF00378979.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Pfanz H, Aschan G, Langenfeld-Heyser R, Wittmann C, Loose M: Ecology and ecophysiology of tree stems: corticular and wood photosynthesis. Naturwissenschaften. 2002, 89: 147-162. 10.1007/s00114-002-0309-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Paul MJ, Foyer CH: Sink regulation of photosynthesis. J Exp Bot. 2001, 52: 1383-1400. 10.1093/jexbot/52.360.1383.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Euring et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement