- Methodology article
- Open Access
A novel method for efficient and abundant production of Phytophthora brassicaezoospores on Brussels sprout leaf discs
© Bouwmeester and Govers; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 08 January 2009
Accepted: 22 August 2009
Published: 22 August 2009
Phytophthora species are notorious oomycete pathogens that cause diseases on a wide range of plants. Our understanding how these pathogens are able to infect their host plants will benefit greatly from information obtained from model systems representative for plant-Phytophthora interactions. One attractive model system is the interaction between Arabidopsis and Phytophthora brassicae. Under laboratory conditions, Arabidopsis can be easily infected with mycelial plugs as inoculum. In the disease cycle, however, sporangia or zoospores are the infectious propagules. Since the current P. brassicae zoospore isolation methods are generally regarded as inefficient, we aimed at developing an alternative method for obtaining high concentrations of P. brassicae zoospores.
P. brassicae isolates were tested for pathogenicity on Brussels sprout plants (Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera). Microscopic examination of leaves, stems and roots infected with a GFP-tagged transformant of P. brassicae clearly demonstrated the susceptibility of the various tissues. Leaf discs were cut from infected Brussels sprout leaves, transferred to microwell plates and submerged in small amounts of water. In the leaf discs the hyphae proliferated and abundant formation of zoosporangia was observed. Upon maturation the zoosporangia released zoospores in high amounts and zoospore production continued during a period of at least four weeks. The zoospores were shown to be infectious on Brussels sprouts and Arabidopsis.
The in vitro leaf disc method established from P. brassicae infected Brussels sprout leaves facilitates convenient and high-throughput production of infectious zoospores and is thus suitable to drive small and large scale inoculation experiments. The system has the advantage that zoospores are produced continuously over a period of at least one month.
Plants can be affected by a broad range of plant-pathogenic oomycetes, such as downy mildews and Phytophthora species. Comprehensive knowledge of host-pathogen interactions is a prerequisite for designing novel control strategies. Elucidation of these complex interactions will especially benefit from easy and user-friendly model pathosystems. One of the potential model systems is the interaction between Phytophthora brassicae and Arabidopsis .
P. brassicae was initially classified as P. porri, a major pathogen causing white tip disease on Allium species [2, 3], but based on detailed characterization, including isozyme pattern, ITS sequence, morphology and host-pathogenicity, it is now categorized as a new and distinct species [4, 5]. P. brassicae has a narrow host range restricted to brassicaceous plants and was shown to be pathogenic on different Brassica species, e.g. Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis), Brussels sprouts (Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera) and rutabaga (swedes) (Brassica napus var. napobrassica) [6, 7]. P. brassicae is mostly associated with post-harvest damage that limits the marketability of cabbage heads and can reach up to 90% losses [8–10]. Although less frequently, disease symptoms have been observed on cabbage plants in the field. Colonization often starts in root or stem tissue, and subsequently progresses upwards through the vascular system, eventually colonizing the leaves. Infection and disease spread is more severe under wet weather conditions with moderate temperatures; the optimum lies between 15 and 20°C, although pathogen growth has been observed at lower temperatures down to -3°C .
In the last decade, Arabidopsis has become the most attractive model plant for genetic and molecular studies and consequently it is favorable as host plant for studying plant-pathogen interactions. Several oomycete pathogens have been reported to infect Arabidopsis, either naturally or under laboratory conditions. These include Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis, Albugo candida and two Phytophthora species, P. cinnamoni and P. brassicae [1, 11–13]. The best studied Phytophthora species, i.e. P. infestans and P. sojae, are incapable to infect Arabidopsis; they trigger defense responses leading to non-host resistance . Roetschi et al. (2001), who first described the P. brassicae-Arabidopsis pathosystem, inoculated a variety of P. brassicae isolates on multiple Arabidopsis accessions and defence mutants, and showed that certain combinations result in compatible and others in incompatible interactions . This pathosystem has the potential to become a model for studying oomycete-plant interactions, allowing concurrent molecular analysis of the host as well as the pathogen.
A disadvantage of P. brassicae is the fact that generating zoospores is troublesome. In nature, Phytophthora species produce vegetative spores, the so-called sporangia, that infect the host tissue upon germination. At lower temperatures sporangia often develop into zoosporangia that release zoospores and these then act as the infectious propagules. In the laboratory one can also use mycelium plugs or mycelial suspensions as inoculum but to mimic disease cycle in nature it is more appropriate to use sporangia or zoospores. Various laboratory protocols describe the isolation of zoospores from in vitro grown mycelium  and for several Phytophthora species it is relatively easy to obtain sufficient amounts of zoospores for en masse inoculation. For P. brassicae, however, efficient production of zoospores is not so straightforward . To induce sporulation P. brassicae has to be cultured on soil medium http://commonweb.unifr.ch/biol/pub/mauchgroup/zoospores.html or transferred to Schmitthenner solution [15, 16]. The preparation of these media is complicated and laborious and the amount of zoospores generated on these media is low. Moreover, zoospore production is dependent on pH, mycelial age and season (K. Belhaj and F. Mauch, personal communication; ). This study aimed at establishing a fast, simple and convenient system for production and isolation of P. brassicae zoospores. We first compared the pathogenicity of five P. brassicae isolates on Brussels sprouts (Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera) and monitored infection and colonization using bright field and fluorescence light microscopy. Subsequently, we optimized the zoospore production system. Leaf discs cut from infected Brussels sprout leaves were shown to be an excellent source for large scale production of P. brassicae zoospores.
Results and Discussion
Phytophthora brassicaelesion development on Brussels sprouts
P. brassicae isolates used in this study; their origin and foliar lesion sizes on Brussels sprouts cultivar Cyrus
Lesion size a
Brassica rapa subsp.pekinensis
2.9 ± 0.1
Brassica oleracea var. alba
4.9 ± 0.4
Brassica oleracea var.gemmifera
5.9 ± 0.4
Brassica rapa subsp.pekinensis
3.5 ± 0.2
Brassica oleracea var.gemmifera
6.0 ± 0.2
The isolates were also tested for their ability to infect stems and roots (Figure 1C, and 1E). All isolates were infectious on both tissues, but – as on the leaves – there was variation in disease progression between isolates (data not shown). To better visualize the colonization process we used a Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) tagged P. brassicae transformant. Microscopical examination of the infected tissues showed hyphal growth in leaves, stems and roots (Figure 1B, D, and 1F). In leaves extensive intercellular hyphal growth was found in the intercellular space between mesophyll cells. The few haustoria that were observed were small and – like haustoria of P. infestans – digit-like in shape. In late stages of infection, hyphae emerged through the stomata and occasionally protruded the epidermal cell layer but there was no sporulation. Instead, in leaf, stem and root lesions typical protrusions were observed (Figure 1). Supposedly, these protrusions are the sporangiophore initials. Only after being exposed to cold water sporangia were formed, which subsequently developed into zoosporangia.
Development of a zoospore production method
Additional file 1: Swimming P. brassicae zoospores. A time-lapse movie corresponding to figure 2H. The movie shows swimming P. brassicae zoospores of isolate HH. The movie lasts 3 seconds and is approximately real time. Magnification: 40×. (MOV 1 MB)
Mean number of zoospores produced by a leaf disca
First harvest (zsp./ml)b
Second harvest (+ 8 days) (zsp./ml)
An additional advantage of this system is that the infected leaf discs can be reused after the first harvest. For additional zoospore harvests fresh water was added to the microwell plates every two days. Subsequently, the microwell plates were placed at 18°C to allow development and maturation of fresh zoosporangia. As in the first round, cold water was added and incubation at 4°C was used to trigger zoospore release. Zoospore yields from successive harvests were lower when compared to initial harvests (Table 2), but the concentrations were still sufficient for infection assays on plants. The leaf discs remained viable and continuously produced zoospores for a period up to one month, albeit that the concentrations became lower as the culture period proceeded.
Furthermore, in accordance with the homothallic nature of P. brassicae, formation of oospores was observed in the infected leaf discs, although at low frequencies and only in older leaf discs (Additional file 2: In planta oospore formation).
Zoospores produced on leaf discs can infect Brussels sprouts and Arabidopsis
On Arabidopsis, sporulating lesions were observed at 4 dpi. Initially the lesions appeared water-soaked, thereafter the infected tissue wilted and subsequently collapsed (Figure 3D). Dried out lesions turned bleached white in color and papery in appearance. Dense tissue colonization by P. brassicae was observed microscopically after trypan blue staining in infected Brussels sprout and Arabidopsis tissue (Figure 3B, E, and 3F).
In this report we demonstrate that P. brassicae easily infects Brussels sprout leaves, stems and roots. An in vitro leaf disc method for the isolation of P. brassicae zoospores was successfully established and zoospores isolated via this procedure were shown to be infectious. This method opens the opportunity to execute – on small to large scale – zoospore infections on brassicaceous plants, including Arabidopsis. The major advantages are its easy handling, the possibility of inoculating large numbers of plants and the continuous production of zoospores over a period of at least one month, at any season.
P. brassicaeisolates and culture conditions
P. brassicae isolates used in this study were obtained from our in-house collection (i.e., II, HH) and from the Fungal Biodiversity Centre CBS, Utrecht, The Netherlands. P. brassicae GFP-transformant 155m  – which has HH as recipient background – was kindly provided by Dr. F. Mauch, University of Fribourg, Switzerland. P. brassicae isolates were cultured at 18°C on fresh 10% V8-juice (The Campbell Soup Co., Camden, N.J.) agar plates .
Plant growth conditions
Brussels sprout plants (Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera cv. Cyrus) were grown from seed in a greenhouse in square (11 × 11 cm) plastic pots at 20–25°C, 50/70% relative humidity (RH) and a 16 h photoperiod. Experiments were conducted with 6 week old Brussels sprout plants. Arabidopsis plants were grown in special potting soil (7 parts peat: 6 parts sand: 1 part clay) in a conditioned growth chamber at 18°C with a 16 h photoperiod and at 75% RH. For inoculation 4 week old Arabidopsis plants were used.
Infection using mycelial plugs as inoculum
Medium sized and large leaves from 6 week old Brussels sprout plants (i.e. the 6th to 14th leaf layer) were detached and washed with water to remove the waxy leaf surface coating. Hereafter, the leaves were placed with their petioles in water-saturated floral foam (Oasis®) in a tray, in such a way that the abaxial sides were facing upwards (Figure 2B). The leaves were sprayed with water and subsequently mycelial plugs (Ø 10 mm), which were taken from the margin of growing colonies, were placed firmly on the abaxial side of the leaf. The trays were closed with transparent lids, wrapped with tape to obtain high humidity, and placed in a growth chamber with a 16 h photoperiod at 18°C and a RH of 75%. The first day the trays were kept in the dark. Mycelial plugs were removed after 2–3 days to stop nutrition facilitation from the agar. Stem sections were artificially wounded with a razor blade and mycelial plugs (Ø 5 mm) were placed on the wound. The inoculated stems were incubated in the same way as the detached leaves.
Infection using zoospores as inoculum
Leaves of Brussels sprouts (cv. Cyrus) and Arabidopsis (accession Col-0) were drop-inoculated with 10 μl droplets containing 1*105 zoospores ml-1. Inoculations on Arabidopsis Col-0 were conducted with the compatible P. brassicae isolate CBS686.95. Plants were kept at 18°C in the dark at high humidity (100% RH) for the first 24 hours after inoculation. Subsequently, plants were placed at 18°C at a relative humidity of 75–80% and a 16 h photoperiod.
Fluorescence microscopy was performed with a Nikon 90i epifluorescence microscope equipped with a digital imaging system (Nikon DS-5Mc camera, Nikon NIS-AR software). GFP fluorescence was examined by using a GFP filter cube (GFP-LP, EX 460–500, DM 505, BA 510). Inoculated plant material was stained with trypan blue  to visualize hyphal structures and death plant cells.
We thank A. Maassen for growing Brussels sprout plants and F. Mauch for supplying P. brassicae GFP-transformant 155m. This research was supported by the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food quality, LNV427 grant ('Parapluplan Phytophthora') and by EU-BioExploit grant FOOD-CT-2005-513959.
- Roetschi A, Si-Ammour A, Belbahri L, Mauch F, Mauch-Mani B: Characterization of an Arabidopsis-Phytophthora pathosystem: Resistance requires a functional pad2 gene and is independent of salicylic acid, ethylene and jasmonic acid signalling. Plant Journal. 2001, 28 (3): 293-305. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2001.01148.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ogilvie L, Mulligan BO: White tip disease of leeks. Gardeners Chronicle. 1931, 89: 360-Google Scholar
- Smilde WD, Van Nes M, Reinink K: Resistance to Phytophthora porri in leek and some of its wild relatives. Euphytica. 1995, 83 (2): 131-138. 10.1007/BF01678040.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Man in 't Veld WA, De Cock AWAM, Ilieva E, Lévesque AC: Gene flow analysis of Phytophthora porri reveals a new species: Phytophthora brassicae sp. nov. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 2002, 108 (1): 51-62. 10.1023/A:1013929110325.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- De Cock AW, Neuvel A, Bahnweg G, De Cock JC, Prell HH: A comparison of morphology, pathogenicity and restriction fragment patterns of mitochondrial DNA among isolates of Phytophthora porri Foister. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology. 1992, 98 (5): 277-289. 10.1007/BF01974386.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Semb L: A rot of stored cabbage caused by a Phytophthora sp. Acta Horticulturae. 1971, 20: 32-35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fagertun L, Semb L: Sykdommer på kål og kålrot, Phytophthora-råte [Diseases on cabbage and rutabaga, Phytophthora-rot]. Norsk Landbruk. 1986, 105 (8): 16-17.Google Scholar
- Geeson JD: Storage rot of white cabbage caused by Phytophthora porri. Plant pathology. 1976, 25 (2): 115-116. 10.1111/j.1365-3059.1976.tb01935.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Geeson JD: Careful harvest is vital for white cabbage storage success. The Grower. 1978, 89 (1): 27-Google Scholar
- Fagertun L: Lagringspatogener på hvitkål og kålrot. Utbredelse,patogenitet og bekjempelse (Post-harvest pathogens on cabbage and rutabaga). Agricultural University of Norway;1987Google Scholar
- Koch E, Slusarenko A: Arabidopsis is susceptible to infection by a downy mildew fungus. Plant Cell. 1990, 2 (5): 437-445. 10.1105/tpc.2.5.437.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chou HM, Bundock N, Rolfe SA, Scholes JD: Infection of Arabidopsis thaliana leaves with Albugo candida (white blister rust) causes a reprogramming of host metabolism. Molecular Plant Pathology. 2000, 1 (2): 99-113. 10.1046/j.1364-3703.2000.00013.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Robinson LH, Cahill DM: Ecotypic variation in the response of Arabidopsis thaliana to Phytophthora cinnamomi. Australasian Plant Pathology. 2003, 32 (1): 53-64. 10.1071/AP02064.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huitema E, Vleeshouwers VGAA, Francis DM, Kamoun S: Active defence responses associated with non-host resistance of Arabidopsis thaliana to the oomycete pathogen Phytophthora infestans. Molecular Plant Pathology. 2003, 4 (6): 487-500. 10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00195.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Erwin DC, Ribeiro OK: Phytophthora diseases worldwide. APS Press Minnesota; 1996.Google Scholar
- Mauch F, Torche S, Schläppi K, Branciard L, Belhaj K, Parisy V, Si-Ammour A: Phytophthora brassicae as a pathogen of Arabidopsis. Oomycete Genetics and Genomic: Diversity, Interactions and Research Tools. Edited by: Lamour K, Kamoun S. Wiley-Blackwell; 2009: 333-345.Google Scholar
- Si-Ammour A, Mauch-Mani B, Mauch F: Quantification of induced resistance against Phytophthora species expressing GFP as a vital marker: β-aminobutyric acid but not BTH protects potato and Arabidopsis from infection. Molecular Plant Pathology. 2003, 4 (4): 237-248. 10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00168.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Keogh RC, Deberall BJ, McLeod S: Comparison of histological and physiological responses to Phakospora pachyrhizi in resistant and susceptible soybean. Transactions of the British Mycological Society. 1980, 74: 329-333.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.