Open Access

An EST database from saffron stigmas

  • Nunzio D'Agostino1,
  • Daniele Pizzichini2,
  • Maria Luisa Chiusano1 and
  • Giovanni Giuliano2Email author
BMC Plant Biology20077:53

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-7-53

Received: 29 April 2007

Accepted: 09 October 2007

Published: 09 October 2007

Abstract

Background

Saffron (Crocus sativus L., Iridaceae) flowers have been used as a spice and medicinal plant ever since the Greek-Minoan civilization. The edible part – the stigmas – are commonly considered the most expensive spice in the world and are the site of a peculiar secondary metabolism, responsible for the characteristic color and flavor of saffron.

Results

We produced 6,603 high quality Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs) from a saffron stigma cDNA library. This collection is accessible and searchable through the Saffron Genes database http://www.saffrongenes.org. The ESTs have been grouped into 1,893 Clusters, each corresponding to a different expressed gene, and annotated. The complete set of raw EST sequences, as well as of their electopherograms, are maintained in the database, allowing users to investigate sequence qualities and EST structural features (vector contamination, repeat regions). The saffron stigma transcriptome contains a series of interesting sequences (putative sex determination genes, lipid and carotenoid metabolism enzymes, transcription factors).

Conclusion

The Saffron Genes database represents the first reference collection for the genomics of Iridaceae, for the molecular biology of stigma biogenesis, as well as for the metabolic pathways underlying saffron secondary metabolism.

Background

Saffron (Crocus sativus L.) is a triploid, sterile plant, probably derived from the wild species Crocus cartwrightianus. It has been propagated and used as a spice and medicinal plant in the Mediterranean area for thousands of years [1]. The domestication of saffron probably occurred in the Greek-Minoan civilization between 3,000 and 1,600 B.C. A fresco depicting saffron gatherers, dating back to 1,600 B.C. has been unearthed on the island of Santorini, Greece.

Saffron is commonly considered the most expensive spice on earth. Nowadays, the main producing countries are Iran, Greece, Spain, Italy, and India (Kashmir). Apart from the commercial and historical aspects, several other characteristics make saffron an interesting biological system: the spice is derived from the stigmas of the flower (Figure 1A), which are harvested manually and subjected to desiccation. The main colors of saffron, crocetin and crocetin glycosides, and the main flavors, picrocrocin and safranal, are derived from the oxidative cleavage of the carotenoid, zeaxanthin [2, 3] (Figure 1B). Saffron belongs to the Iridaceae (Liliales, Monocots) with poorly characterized genomes of relatively large size.
Figure 1

The saffron spice. A. Crocus flowers. Arrowheads point to the stigmas, which, harvested and desiccated, constitute the saffron spice. B. Biosynthetic pathway of the main saffron color (crocin) and flavors (picrocrocin and safranal) (from [2], modified).

The characterization of the transcriptome of saffron stigmas is likely to shed light on several important biological phenomena: the molecular basis of flavor and color biogenesis in spices, the biology of the gynoecium, and the genomic organization of Iridaceae. For these reasons, we have undertaken the sequencing and bioinformatics characterization of Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs) from saffron stigmas.

Results and discussion

Sequencing and assembly

An oriented cDNA library from mature saffron stigmas in lambda Uni-ZAP [2] was kindly provided by Prof. Bilal Camara, University of Strasbourg. The library was subjected to automated excision, and the cDNA inserts were subjected to PCR amplification and sequenced from the 5' end.

9,769 electropherograms were analyzed with the Phred program [4]. Low quality sequences were removed from the 5' and 3' ends, and the sequences were further processed to remove vector contaminations and to mask low complexity and/or repeat sub-sequences. This process reduced the original dataset to 6,603 high-quality sequences longer than 60 nucleotides. Only 6,202 EST fragments whose length is greater than or equal to 100 nucleotides were considered for the submission to the NCBI dbEST division. They are accessible under the accession numbers from EX142501 to EX148702.

The EST dataset was subjected to a clustering/assembling procedure [5], in order to group ESTs putatively derived from the same gene and to generate a tentative consensus sequence (TC) per putative transcript. The total number of clusters generated are 1,893. Each cluster should correspond to a unique gene, i.e. it represents a gene index. 1,376 clusters are made up of a single EST and are therefore classified as singletons. The remaining 517 clusters are made up of 5,324 ESTs, assembled into 534 TCs (Table 1). In 11 clusters, ESTs are assembled so that multiple TCs are defined (ranging from 2 to 6). Multiple TCs in a cluster have common regions of high similarity that may be due to possible alternative transcripts, to paralogy or to domain sharing. The GC content distribution in the dataset is reported in Figure 2. The average GC content is around 44%.
Figure 2

GC content distribution. The number of ESTs is plotted against their GC content. The average GC content is 44.3%.

Table 1

Assembly statistics

Singleton ESTs

N. of sequences

1,376

 

Avg. EST length (nt)

239

 

Nucleotides masked

10.2%

ESTs in contigs

N. of sequences

5,324

 

Avg. EST length (nt)

427

 

Nucleotides masked

2.4%

Contigs

N. of contigs

534

 

Avg. length (nt)

552

The database and the web interface

The dataset was used to construct the Saffron Genes database [6]. The database architecture consists of a main MySQL relational database where all the data generated are deposited, and two satellite databases myGO and myKEGG. A user-friendly web interface is created using HTML and PHP scripts. A pre-defined query system supports data retrieval; HTML-tree graphical display is implemented to browse enzyme classes and metabolic pathways. Transcripts, which correspond to criteria defined by the user, can be mapped on-the-fly onto the KEGG metabolic maps, which are accessible as GIF images [7]. The electropherograms of the single ESTs can be downloaded to re-check sequence quality.

Automated functional annotation

In order to assign a preliminary function to each transcript, the TCs and singletons were compared using BLASTX to the UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot database. Of 1,910 transcripts, 1,158 (60.6%) have no hits, while the remaining 752 (39.4%) have at least one significant match in the protein database. Within this latter set, 131 (6.9%) are described as hypothetical, unknown or expressed proteins thus not confirming an effective functional role of the transcript product.

Gene Ontology terms were assigned automatically to those 157 transcripts matching a protein in the UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot database whose accession numbers are present into the satellite database myGO (see Methods). In many cases, multiple gene ontology terms could be assigned to the same transcript, resulting in 210 assignments to the molecular function, 944 to the biological process and finally 2,192 to the cellular component class. To give a broad overview of the ontology content, the entire set of the ontologies was mapped onto the plant GO Slims terms. In the molecular function ontology class, the most represented terms describe catalytic (33.3%) and hydrolase activity (20.0%) (Figure 3A). The remaining categories are less represented. Considering the biological process class, the vast majority of the GO assignments corresponds to the more general transport category (~78.8%) (Figure 3B). Finally, for the cellular component class the assignments were mainly given to the plastid (36%), mitochondrion (33%), and cytoplasmic membrane-bound vesicle (29%) components (Figure 3C). 64 transcripts are associated to 46 distinct enzymes as they are classified and described into the ENZYME repository [8]. 35 out of the 46 enzymes had mappings to 55 KEGG biochemical pathways [9]. As we know, some enzymes can occur in more than one pathway; on the other hand there are 8 enzymes which only act in a single pathway, that were classified as pathway-specific (data not shown).
Figure 3

Assignments of Plant Gene Ontology terms to the Crocus putative transcripts. A. Molecular function B. Biological process C. Cellular component. For details, see Methods.

Genes expressed in Crocus stigmas

EST abundance in a contig can be indicative of the mRNA relative abundance in the stigma tissue. We identified the TCs that are composed of ≥ 20 ESTs (Table 2). The most highly expressed TC, Cl000057:2 (547 ESTs), bears homology to short chain dehydrogenases (PF00106.12). This protein family comprises members involved in hormone biosynthesis, like the ABA2 gene of Arabidopsis which catalyzes the conversion of xanthoxin into ABA aldehyde [10], or in sexual organ identity, like the TASSELSEED2 (TS2) gene of maize (Figure 4). TS2 is expressed in pistil primordia cells of maize, where it activates a cell death process eliminating these cells from male reproductive organs [11]. Biochemical studies suggest that the TS2 protein is a hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase [12]. It will be interesting to determine the function and substrate specificity of the saffron Cl000057:2 product.
Table 2

Highly expressed TCs

Contig

# ESTs

bp

BlastX annotation

e-value

Cl000057:2

547

1242

Q7XL00_ORYSA -OJ000315_02.17 protein

0

Cl000837:2

122

1528

Q8VZY2_MUSAC -Cytochrome P450-1

0

Cl000799:2

114

711

-

-

Cl001953:2

109

755

O80821_ARATH -Hypothetical protein At2g41470

1,00E-16

Cl001114:3

104

770

HSP13_ARATH -18.2 kDa class I heat shock protein (HSP 18.2)

1,00E-32

Cl000299:1

104

570

Q9XHD5_IPOBA -B12D protein

2,00E-32

Cl000870:1

94

592

Q6ZX06_ORYSA -Lipid transfer protein

3,00E-26

Cl001582:1

61

600

-

-

Cl000209:1

61

1071

Q5G1M8_9POTV -Polyprotein (Fragment)

0

Cl001173:1

56

785

Q6H452_ORYSA -Putative monoglyceride lipase

0

Cl000220:1

55

831

Q94HY3_ORYSA -Putative gamma-lyase

0

Cl000348:1

54

955

Q9AVB7_9LILI -LhMyb protein

0

Cl001319:1

47

460

Q8RVT5_PANGI -Acyl-CoA-binding protein

1,00E-35

Cl001051:1

45

665

Q8H293_ANACO -Cytochrome b5

0

Cl000246:1

45

537

-

-

Cl000336:1

44

685

GPAT6_ARATH -Glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 6 (EC 2.3.1.15)

0

Cl000468:2

42

1021

Q70SZ8_9ASPA -Carboxyl methyltransferase

0

Cl000482:1

38

730

Q84P95_ORYSA -Disulfide isomerase

0

Cl000982:1

38

230

-

-

Cl001040:1

37

734

Q8GZR6_LYCES -GcpE

0

Cl001329:1

36

384

Q4LEZ4_ASPOF -MADS-box transcription factor

1,00E-29

Cl001815:1

34

992

BGAL_ASPOF -Beta-galactosidase precursor (EC 3.2.1.23) (Lactase)

0

Cl000113:1

33

634

Q6VAB3_STERE -UDP-glycosyltransferase 85A8

9,00E-16

Cl000687:1

33

782

Q9XGS6_PRUDU -Cytosolic class II low molecular weight heat shock protein

0

Cl000887:1

33

802

Q9FVZ7_ORYSA -Putative steroid membrane binding protein

0

Cl001463:1

32

605

Q9FE65_ARATH -60S ribosomal protein L34, putative

0

Cl000932:1

32

974

Q652L6_ORYSA -Putative monodehydroascorbate reductase

0

Cl001812:1

30

554

Q42338_ARATH -B12D-like protein

5,00E-32

Cl001134:1

29

569

Q8W453_ARATH -Hypothetical protein (DIR1 protein) (At5g48485)

7,00E-14

Cl001906:1

28

602

Q4TES1_TETNG -Chromosome undetermined SCAF5157

9,00E-07

Cl001988:1

25

1446

Q8VX49_WHEAT -Cytochrome P450 reductase (EC 1.6.2.4)

0

Cl001107:1

24

783

Q9SGA5_ARATH -F1C9.14 protein (At3g02070)

0

Cl001447:1

24

453

Q5VS45_ORYSA -Hypothetical protein P0425F02.23

1,00E-12

Cl000515:1

24

506

Q6ZCF3_ORYSA -Putative copper chaperone

8,00E-15

Cl000762:1

24

247

-

-

Cl001114:2

23

748

HSP13_ARATH -18.2 kDa class I heat shock protein (HSP 18.2)

1,00E-32

Cl001894:1

23

312

-

-

Cl000057:1

23

740

TRXH1_ARATH -Thioredoxin H-type 1 (TRX-H-1)

1,00E-36

Cl001263:1

22

667

Q9XH76_ARATH -Zinc finger protein-like (PMZ)

0

Cl001010:1

21

1066

Q8H2A7_ANACO -PFE18 protein (Fragment)

0

Cl000300:1

21

506

Q93WW3_NARPS -Metallothionein-like protein type 2

6,00E-12

Cl000057:3

21

183

-

-

Cl000885:2

21

753

Q41067_PINSY -Polyubiquitin

0

Cl001397:1

20

798

Q9LSQ5_ARATH -1,4-benzoquinone reductase-like;

0

Cl001774:1

20

457

Q9SN96_ARATH -Hypothetical protein F18L15.150

7,00E-19

Cl000185:1

20

397

Q84LB7_MALDO -Cysteine protease inhibitor cystatin (Fragment)

2,00E-12

Cl001935:1

20

673

SRP19_ARATH -Signal recognition particle 19 kDa protein (SRP19)

4,00E-38

Cl000333:1

20

418

Q7F6G0_ORYSA -Putative metallothionein-like protein

6,00E-20

Cl000594:1

20

1145

SUS1_TULGE -Sucrose synthase 1 (EC 2.4.1.13)

0

Figure 4

ClustalW alignments of deduced protein sequences expressed in Crocus stigmas. A. Cl000057:2, aligned with short chain alcohol dehydrogenases: Arabidopsis ABA2 (GenBank acc. NP_175644) and maize TS2 (GenBank acc. P50160). B. Cl000627:1, aligned with Crocus crocetin Glycosyltrasferase 2 (GenBank acc. P50160). C. Cl000468:1, aligned with Bixa and Crocus carboxyl methyltransferases (Genbank acc. CAD70190 and CAD70566) D. C1000045:1, aligned with cauliflower Or (GenBank acc. ABH07405).

A large number of Cytochrome P450 sequences are expressed in saffron stigmas, some of which at very high levels (Tables 2 and 3). Also, lipid metabolism seems to be very active, judging from the TCs encoding proteins involved in this process (Table 3).
Table 3

TCs grouped by putative function

Contig

# ESTs

bp

BlastX annotation

e-value

Cyt. P450

cr.saCl000837:2

122

1528

Q8VZY2_MUSAC – Cytochrome P450-1

0

cr.saCl001988:1

25

1446

Q8VX49_WHEAT – Cytochrome P450 reductase (EC 1.6.2.4)

0

cr.saCl000837:3

17

674

Q8L5Q2_CICAR – Putative cytochrome P450 monooxygenase

2e-27

cr.saCl000414:1

5

752

Q9AVM1_ASPOF – Cytochrome P450

0

cr.saCl000150:1

3

406

Q9ATU9_LOLRI – Putative cytochrome P450

4e-17

cr.saCl000166:1

3

710

Q6EP96_ORYSA – Putative cytochrome P450

9e-16

cr.saCl001887:1

2

248

Q6H516_ORYSA – Putative cytochrome P450

0.0004

cr.saCl000837:1

2

600

Q8VZY2_MUSAC – Cytochrome P450-1

3e-16

cr13_O11

1

360

Q8S7S6_ORYSA – Cytochrome P450-like protein

7e-35

cr21_F05

1

448

Q8S7S6_ORYSA – Cytochrome P450-like protein

1.00053e-42

cr28_M16

1

533

Q6Z0U4_ORYSA – Putative cytochrome P450 reductase

0

cr34_J15

1

509

Q8S7S6_ORYSA – Cytochrome P450-like protein

0

Lipid metabolism

cr.saCl000870:1

94

592

Q6ZX06_ORYSA – Lipid transfer protein

3e-26

cr.saCl001173:1

56

785

Q6H452_ORYSA -Putative monoglyceride lipase

0

cr.saCl000787:1

10

743

Q94GF2_ORYSA – Putative phospholipase

0

cr.saCl001992:1

5

637

Q52RN7_LEOAR – Non-specific lipid transfer protein-like

2e-28

cr.saCl001009:1

5

667

O04439_ALLPO – 3-ketoacyl carrier protein synthase III

0

cr.saCl001749:1

5

635

Q9NCL8_DICDI – Phosphatidylinositol transfer protein 1

5e-30

cr.saCl000344:1

5

704

O49902_NICRU – 1-phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate phosphodiesterase

0

cr.saCl000816:1

2

677

Q6K7T9_ORYSA – Peroxisomal fatty acid beta-oxidation multif. protein

0

cr.saCl000294:1

2

707

Q84Z91_ORYSA – Oxysterol-binding protein-like

0

cr.saCl000741:1

2

734

STAD_ORYSA – Acyl-(acyl-carrier-protein) desaturase, chloroplast precursor

0

cr13_F23

1

350

Q8S459_LYCES – Putative sphingolipid delta 4 desaturase DES-1

0

cr15_P04

1

306

GPX4_MESCR – Probable phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase

5e-16

cr27_P08

1

74

Q5N7U2_ORYSA – Phospholipid/glycerol acyltransferase-like protein

4e-06

cr35_M17

1

437

GPX4_MESCR – Probable phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase

1e-24

Carotenoid metabolism

cr.saCl000944:1

11

645

Q8VXP2_9ASPA – Beta-carotene hydroxylase

4e-17

cr.saCl001432:1

2

602

Q9FZ04_CAPAN – Plastid terminal oxidase

0

cr.saCl001532:1

7

420

GT_CITUN – Limonoid UDP-glucosyltransferase

2e-06

cr.saCl001032:1

2

426

5CD69_9MYRT – Monoterpene glucosyltransferase

2e-08

cr.saCl000627:1

2

611

69UF5_ORYSA – Putative anthocyanin 5-O-glucosyltransferase

0

cr.saCl000468:2

42

1021

Q70SZ8_9ASPA – Carboxyl methyltransferase

0

cr.saCl000468:1

6

767

70SZ8_9ASPA – Carboxyl methyltransferase

0

cr9_J02

1

69

Q9FEC9_LYCES – Plastid quinol oxidase (Plastid terminal oxidase)

1e-05

cr36_B21

1

706

PAP2_ORYSA – Probable plastid-lipid associated protein 2, chloroplast precursor

0

cr.saCl000045

14

746

Q9FKF4_ARATH – Hypothetical protein At5g61670

0

Transcription factors

cr.saCl000348:1

54

955

Q9AVB7_9LILI – LhMyb protein

0

cr.saCl001329:1

36

384

Q4LEZ4_ASPOF – MADS-box transcription factor

1e-29

cr.saCl000348:2

6

669

Q70RD2_GERHY – MYB8 protein

0

cr.saCl000712:1

6

714

Q6Z8N9_ORYSA – Putative AT-hook DNA-binding protein

0

cr.saCl000359:1

5

593

O82115_ORYSA – Zinc finger protein

5e-19

cr.saCl000502:1

3

565

ULT1_ARATH – Protein ULTRAPETALA1

4e-37

cr.saCl000652:1

2

537

Q6ZG02_ORYSA – Putative DNA-binding protein WRKY2

0

cr17_J15

1

567

Q6Q6W8_9ASPA – Agamous MADS-box transcription factor 1a

0

cr26_B12

1

653

Q8LAP4_ARATH – Similar to MYB-related DNA-binding protein

2e-23

cr6_B13

1

312

Q9M7F3_MAIZE – LIM transcription factor homolog

0

Several TCs encode putative carotenoid metabolism enzymes (Table 3): Cl000944:1 encodes non-heme -β-carotene-hydroxylase, which is highly expressed in saffron stigmas [13]. Cl000627:1 encodes a putative glucosyltransferase, very similar to UGTCs2, which is able to glycosylate crocetin in vitro [3] (Figure 4). Cl001532:1 and Cl001032:1 also, encode putative isoprenoid GTases, one of which could represent the still missing enzyme responsible for the glycosylation of picrocrocin (Figure 1). Cl001432:1 encodes a protein similar to plastid terminal oxidase, involved in phytoene desaturation [14], while EST cr36_B21 encodes a protein similar to fibrillin, which is a carotenoid-binding protein in pepper chromoplasts [15]. Cl000468 encodes a carboxyl methyltransferase very similar to the one catalyzing the synthesis of bixin [16] (Figure 4). This TC seems to encode a "short" form of the annatto and crocus methyltransferases from GenBank, possibly derived from alternative splicing (Figure 4). Although a methyltransferase reaction has not been described in saffron stigmas, the biosynthesis of bixin and that of crocin share some features in common, since both pigments are derived from the oxidative cleavage of a carotenoid [17]. Finally, Cl000045:1 encodes a protein highly similar to the cauliflower Or gene product, a plastid-associated protein with a cysteine-rich DnaJ domain. A dominant Or mutation induces β-carotene accumulation in cauliflower inflorescences, suggesting that Or is somehow involved in the control of chromoplast differentiation [18, 19].

Several TCs encode putative transcription factors (Table 3). The most abundantly expressed, Cl000348:1, encodes a Myb-like protein with high similarity to LhMyb (from Lilium, GenBank accession BAB40790) Myb8 (from Gerbera [20] – also showing similarity to Cl000348:2) and Myb305 (From Antirrhinium [21]). All three factors are highly expressed in flowers. Also highly expressed is Cl001329:1, encoding a putative MADS box transcription factor. This protein shows high similarity to AODEF, a B-functional transcription factor from Asparagus expressed in stamens and inner tepals [22] and to LMADS1, a lily protein whose ectopic expression in dominant negative form causes an ap3-like phenotype in Arabidopsis [23].

Finally, several TCs – Cl000209:1 (61 ESTs) Cl000582:1 (18 ESTs) Cl001827:1 (5 ESTs) and Cl000731(2 ESTs) – show similarity to potyviral sequences, indicating that the sequenced library likely derives from virus-infected tissue. Potyviruses like Iris Mild Mosaic Virus are known to infect Crocus [24]. The sequences of these TCs will prove useful for diagnostic and phytosanitary purposes.

Conclusion

The Saffron Genes database [6] has been designed to manage and to explore the EST collection from saffron stigmas, providing a reference for the expression pattern analysis in this tissue as well as a primary view of the genomic properties of this species, representative of Iridaceae. The complete set of raw EST sequences, as well as of their electopherograms, are maintained in the database allowing users investigate on library qualities and on single EST structural features (vector contamination, repeat regions). Annotation is provided for single ESTs as well as for their assemblies (tentative consensus), to evaluate the consistency of the automated functional assignments. The putative transcripts determined to be associated to enzymes are organized into classes and can be viewed also in terms of enzyme assignments to metabolic pathways. This represents a straightforward way to investigate the properties of the stigma transriptome. As discussed above, this transcriptome contains a series of interesting sequences, whose function can now be tested using in vivo or in vitro approaches.

Methods

EST sequencing

An oriented cDNA library from mature saffron stigmas in lambda Uni-ZAP [2] was kindly provided by Prof. Bilal Camara, University of Strasbourg. The pBluescript phagemids contained in the phages were subjected to in vivo excision using the ExAssist helper phage and the SOLR strain according to the manufacturer's protocols (Stratagene Uni-ZAP manual) and plated on LB Agar plates with Ampicillin, IPTG and X-GAL. White colonies were picked by hand and grown overnight in LB 384-well plates in LB+Ampicillin. Approx. 1 uL of each saturated culture was inoculated using a 384-pin tool (VP Scientific) in a 20-uL PCR reaction containing 50 ng each of primers T3 and T7 (Stratagene) and 0.5 U Taq Polymerase (GE Healthcare). The reactions, in 384-well format, were amplified using the following PCR cycle: denaturation step (94°C 2'), followed by 35 cycles of denaturation (94°C 45") annealing (50°C 45") and elongation (72°C 2'), followed by an elongation step (72°C 10'). Approx. 1/4 of the PCR reactions were checked by loading 2 mL on a 1% agarose gel, and only plates containing > 80% amplified, robust single bands were processed further. The PCR reactions were purified by gel filtration on 384-well deep-well PVDF plates (Corning cat. 3531). Each well was filled with 250 mL of resin (3.5% Sephadex G-100, GE Healthcare) and the resin was packed by centrifugation at 3.000 × g for 5'; after addition of 150 mL of resin, the plate was re-centrifuged as above; 10 mL of the PCR template were loaded in each well and the purified reaction was collected by centrifugation as above.

3 mL of the PCR template were used for sequencing with the T3 primer in a final volume of 10 mL in 384-well format. The BigDye Terminator kit v 3.1 (Applied Biosystems) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions at a dilution of 1:16. The dye terminators were removed by gel filtration on 384-well deep-well PVDF plates (see above) using 6.5% Sephadex G-50 fine (GE Healthcare). The reactions were loaded on an ABI 3730 sequencer with 50-cm capillaries.

EST processing and contig assembly

The electropherograms were analyzed using the pipeline ParPEST developed at the University of Naples [5]. Sequence base calls were performed using Phred [4] with a quality cutoff of 0.05. Vector contaminations were identified using RepeatMasker [25] and NCBI's UniVec as filtering database. RepeatMasker and RepBase [26] are used for filtering and masking low complexity sub-sequences and interspersed repeats. EST clustering was made using PaCE [27] with default parameters. All the ESTs in a cluster are assembled into contigs using CAP3 [28] with an overlapping window of 60 nucleotides and a minimum score of 85.

Functional annotation

Raw EST data and contigs are compared using BLASTX against the UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot database [29]. The BLAST search is filtered setting an e-Value less equal than 0.001. The association between the transcripts and the Gene Ontology terms occurs when the accession number of the protein subject is reported in the myGO database. All the GO terms related to each best BLAST hit were converted to the plant GO Slim terms using the map2slim.pl script, distributed as part of the go-perl package (version 0.04). The plant GO Slim file was downloaded from ... the Gene Ontology webpage [30]. The association between the transcripts and the Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers occurs if the EC is present in the description lines of each best BLAST hit. Transcripts, which are associated to EC numbers, are also linked to myKEGG and can be mapped onto the metabolic pathways.

Multiple alignment generation

ClustalW sequence alignment [31] was performed using the EBI web interface [32].

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Work supported by the Italian Ministry of Research (FIRB project) and the Italian Ministry of Agriculture (Agronanotech Project). We thank Prof. Bilal Camara for providing the cDNA library from saffron stigmas, Prof. Laura Spanò for supervision of DP's doctoral work and Francesca Cecchi for help with handling of electropherograms. This is DISSPAPA contribution n. 151.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Soil, Plant, Environmental and Animal Production Sciences, University of Naples Federico II
(2)
ENEA, Casaccia Research Center

References

  1. Fernandez JA: Biology, biotechnology and biomedicine of saffron. Recent Res Devel Plant Sci. 2004, 2: 127-159.Google Scholar
  2. Bouvier F, Suire C, Mutterer J, Camara B: Oxidative remodeling of chromoplast carotenoids: Identification of the carotenoid dioxygenase CsCCD and CsZCD genes Involved in Crocus secondary metabolite biogenesis. Plant Cell. 2003, 15 (1): 47-62. 10.1105/tpc.006536.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Moraga AR, Nohales PF, Perez JA, Gomez-Gomez L: Glucosylation of the saffron apocarotenoid crocetin by a glucosyltransferase isolated from Crocus sativus stigmas. Planta. 2004, 219 (6): 955-966. 10.1007/s00425-004-1299-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P: Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 1998, 8 (3): 175-185.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. D'Agostino N, Aversano M, Chiusano ML: ParPEST: a pipeline for EST data analysis based on parallel computing. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005, 6 (Suppl 4): S9-10.1186/1471-2105-6-S4-S9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. [http://www.saffrongenes.org]
  7. D'Agostino N, Aversano M, Frusciante L, Chiusano ML: TomatEST database: in silico exploitation of EST data to explore expression patterns in tomato species. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35 (Database): D901-905. 10.1093/nar/gkl921.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Hattori M, Aoki-Kinoshita KF, Itoh M, Kawashima S, Katayama T, Araki M, Hirakawa M: From genomics to chemical genomics: new developments in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34 (Database): D354-357. 10.1093/nar/gkj102.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Bairoch A: The ENZYME database in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28 (1): 304-305. 10.1093/nar/28.1.304.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Gonzalez-Guzman M, Apostolova N, Belles JM, Barrero JM, Piqueras P, Ponce MR, Micol JL, Serrano R, Rodriguez PL: The short-chain alcohol dehydrogenase ABA2 catalyzes the conversion of xanthoxin to abscisic aldehyde. Plant Cell. 2002, 14 (8): 1833-1846. 10.1105/tpc.002477.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Calderon-Urrea A, Dellaporta SL: Cell death and cell protection genes determine the fate of pistils in maize. Development. 1999, 126 (3): 435-441.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Wu X, Knapp S, Stamp A, Stammers DK, Jornvall H, Dellaporta SL, Oppermann U: Biochemical characterization of TASSELSEED 2, an essential plant short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase with broad spectrum activities. Febs J. 2007, 274 (5): 1172-1182. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05642.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Castillo R, Fernandez JA, Gomez-Gomez L: Implications of Carotenoid Biosynthetic Genes in Apocarotenoid Formation during the Stigma Development of Crocus sativus and Its Closer Relatives. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139 (2): 674-689. 10.1104/pp.105.067827.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Carol P, Kuntz M: A plastid terminal oxidase comes to light: implications for carotenoid biosynthesis and chlororespiration. Trends Plant Sci. 2001, 6 (1): 31-36. 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01811-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Deruere J, Romer S, d'Harlingue A, Backhaus RA, Kuntz M, Camara B: Fibril assembly and carotenoid overaccumulation in chromoplasts: a model for supramolecular lipoprotein structures. Plant Cell. 1994, 6 (1): 119-133. 10.1105/tpc.6.1.119.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Bouvier F, Dogbo O, Camara B: Biosynthesis of the food and cosmetic plant pigment bixin (annatto). Science. 2003, 300 (5628): 2089-2091. 10.1126/science.1085162.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Giuliano G, Rosati C, Bramley PM: To dye or not to dye: biochemistry of annatto unveiled. Trends Biotechnol. 2003, 21 (12): 513-516. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2003.10.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Lu S, Van Eck J, Zhou X, Lopez AB, O'Halloran DM, Cosman KM, Conlin BJ, Paolillo DJ, Garvin DF, Vrebalov J, Kochian LV, Kupper H, Earle ED, Cao J, Li L: The cauliflower Or gene encodes a DnaJ cysteine-rich domain-containing protein that mediates high-levels of {beta}-carotene accumulation. Plant Cell. 2006, 18: 3594-3605. 10.1105/tpc.106.046417.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Giuliano G, Diretto G: Of chromoplasts and chaperones. Trends Plant Sci. 2007.Google Scholar
  20. Elomaa P, Uimari A, Mehto M, Albert VA, Laitinen RA, Teeri TH: Activation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in Gerbera hybrida (Asteraceae) suggests conserved protein-protein and protein-promoter interactions between the anciently diverged monocots and eudicots. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133 (4): 1831-1842. 10.1104/pp.103.026039.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Jackson D, Culianez-Macia F, Prescott AG, Roberts K, Martin C: Expression patterns of myb genes from Antirrhinum flowers. Plant Cell. 1991, 3 (2): 115-125. 10.1105/tpc.3.2.115.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Park JH, Ishikawa Y, Yoshida R, Kanno A, Kameya T: Expression of AODEF, a B-functional MADS-box gene, in stamens and inner tepals of the dioecious species Asparagus officinalis L. Plant Mol Biol. 2003, 51 (6): 867-875. 10.1023/A:1023097202885.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Tzeng T-Y, Yang C-H: A MADS Box Gene from Lily (Lilium longiflorum) is Sufficient to Generate Dominant Negative Mutation by Interacting with PISTILLATA (PI) in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001, 42 (10): 1156-1168. 10.1093/pcp/pce151.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Navalinskijene M, Samuitiene M: Viruses affecting some bulb and corm flower crops. Biologija. 2001, 4: 40-42.Google Scholar
  25. [http://www.repeatmasker.org]
  26. Jurka J: Repbase update: a database and an electronic journal of repetitive elements. Trends Genet. 2000, 16 (9): 418-420. 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02093-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Kalyanaraman A, Aluru S, Kothari S, Brendel V: Efficient clustering of large EST data sets on parallel computers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31 (11): 2963-2974. 10.1093/nar/gkg379.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Huang X, Madan A: CAP3: A DNA sequence assembly program. Genome Res. 1999, 9 (9): 868-877. 10.1101/gr.9.9.868.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Wu CH, Apweiler R, Bairoch A, Natale DA, Barker WC, Boeckmann B, Ferro S, Gasteiger E, Huang H, Lopez R, Magrane M, Martin MJ, Mazumder R, O'Donovan C, Redaschi N, Suzek B: The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt): an expanding universe of protein information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34 (Database): D187-191. 10.1093/nar/gkj161.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. [http://www.geneontology.org/GO_slims/goslim_plant.obo]
  31. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ: CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22 (22): 4673-4680. 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. [http://www.ebi.ac.uk/clustalw]

Copyright

© D'Agostino et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.