Transcriptional control of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes in extreme phenotypes for berry pigmentation of naturally occurring grapevines
© Castellarin and Di Gaspero; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 30 March 2007
Accepted: 30 August 2007
Published: 30 August 2007
Fruit coloration of red-skinned grapevines is mainly due to anthocyanin pigments. We analysed a panel of nine cultivars that included extreme phenotypes for berry colour, ranging from green (absence of anthocyanins) to red, purple, violet and blue. Expression of six genes of the anthocyanin pathway coding for flavanone-hydroxylase (F3H), flavonoid 3'-hydroxylase (F3'H), flavonoid 3',5'-hydroxylase (F3'5'H), UDP-glucose:flavonoid-3-O-glucosyltransferase (UFGT), glutathione-S-transferase (GST), O-methyltransferase (OMT) and four transcription factors (MybA, MybB, MybC, MybD) was analysed by quantitative RT-PCR at four developmental stages from before the onset of ripening until full maturity and compared to anthocyanin metabolites.
Total anthocyanin content at full maturity correlated well with the cumulative expression of F3H, UFGT and GST throughout ripening. Transcripts of the last two genes were absent in the green-skinned cultivar 'Sauvignonasse', also known as 'Tocai friulano', and were at least 10-fold less abundant in pale red cultivars, such as 'Pinot gris' and 'Gewürztraminer', compared to fully coloured cultivars. Predominance of tri-hydroxylated anthocyanins (delphinidin, petunidin and malvidin) in cultivars bearing dark berries with violet and blue hue was associated with higher ratios of F3'5'H/F3'H transcription, compared to red-skinned cultivars. Higher levels of OMT transcripts were observed in berries of cultivars that accumulated methoxylated forms of anthocyanins more abundantly than non-methoxylated forms.
Colour variation of the grape berry conforms to a peculiar pattern of genotype-specific expression of the whole set of anthocyanin genes in a direct transcript-metabolite-phenotype relationship. Cumulative mRNA levels of the structural genes and their relative abundance throughout ripening explained per se the final phenotype for anthocyanin content, anthocyanin composition, colour intensity and colour hue of grapes at berry maturity.
Regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis has been studied across a number of flowering plants thanks to the availability of colour mutants that have facilitated the dissection of complex regulatory networks. Many studies have concerned themselves with the genetic control of colour phenotypes in floral organs of ornamentals (mainly Antirrhinum majus and Petunia × hybrida) or in kernels of Zea mays and seed teguments of Arabidopsis thaliana, which has led to a comprehensive view of the common features and the species-specific peculiarity of anthocyanin regulation in those plants [1–6]. In fruit trees, the genetics underlying the presence or absence of anthocyanin pigmentation has been elucidated in bilberry , grapevine [8, 9] and apple . However, studies pertaining to the quantitative and qualitative variation of anthocyanins in fruit and the resulting shifts in colour have only scratched the surface of the regulatory network by separately analysing the role of single genes [11–13] or single transcription factors [14, 15].
Grapevine is a fruit crop that encompasses a wide phenotypic variation in berry colour. Plant adaptation to different environments and centuries of human selection have produced numerous genotypes in which the intensity and the hue of red coloration vary extensively. A mixture of variations in anthocyanin content and in the relative proportion of different anthocyanins can produce extreme phenotypes for skin pigmentation. Anthocyanin concentration in epidermal cells correlates well with the darkness of berry colour. According to , anthocyanin concentration ranged from 6.2 to 26 mg kg-1 of berry in a panel of 64 pigmented cultivars. Anthocyanin profile and hue might vary dramatically as well. We have previously demonstrated that the ratio of blue tri-hydroxylated to red di-hydrohylated anthocyanins is under transcriptional control of flavonoid 3'(5')-hydroxylase genes (F3'H and F3'5'H) and it correlates well with the evolution of colour hue throughout ripening in the cultivar 'Merlot' . All red cultivars investigated so far synthesise all five grapevine anthocyanins (cyanidin, peonidin, delphinidin, petunidin and malvidin) [16, 17]. This means that all cultivars express functional F3'H and F3'5'H genes for the synthesis of 3'4'-OH and 3'4'5'-OH anthocyanins as well as O-methyltransferases (OMT) for the methylation of primary anthocyanins. These genes, alongside other key genes of the core pathway, are assumed to be differentially regulated in different genetic backgrounds. The biological questions we aimed to address are: does most regulation of the anthocyanin biosynthesis in ripening fruit occur at transcriptional level in a similar way as it occurs in other species in pigmented organs other than fruit ? Are the distinct patterns of expression of structural genes sufficient to explain the observed variation of contrasting colour phenotypes peculiar to each cultivar ?
Red-to-blue colour variation across grapevine cultivars has evolutionary, technological and health implications of fascinating interest. It is generally assumed that red coloration was the most primitive form of reproductive organs in plants that synthesise anthocyanins. Anthocyanins appeared approximately 120 million years ago [18, 19] and naturally served for the recruitment of seed dispersers and in UV protection. Unlike roses and carnations, which still do not naturally display blue colouration, most species including grapevine have later acquired the capability of synthesising anthocyainic blue pigments. According to this view, the gene F3'H coding for the enzyme that leads to red anthocyanins is ancestral to the gene F3'5'H coding for the enzyme that converts red into blue anthocyanins . Based on phylogenetic analysis, most F3'5'H arose from F3'H by gene duplication before the divergence of angiosperms and gymnosperms but in the documented case of the Asteraceae family this event occurred repeatedly and much more recently in the evolutionary time scale . This raises the questions of how and when genes for blue coloration appeared in the grape genome. F3'H and F3'5'H currently known in the grape genome split in two different branches of a phylogenetic tree, that included also F3'H and F3'5'H from other plants . F3'5'H from the grape genome grouped together with the homologous F3'5'H from other species rather than with the paralogous F3'H from grape. This feature is predictive of an ancient origin of the F3'5'H found in the present-day grapevines which was already present in the palaeo-ancestor before the split of major dicot lineages. More recently, F3'5'H has undergone further evolution in the grape genome, as witnessed by the structural complexity of the genomic region on the linkage group 6 containing F3'5'H .
Anthocyanin composition has a technological impact on the colour of must obtained from a given cultivar. Colour of pure anthocyanins shifts progressively from red to blue as the number of substituted groups on the B-ring increases and as methoxyl groups replace hydroxyl groups . After must fermentation, anthocyanin stability in wines is threatened by a number of factors (light exposure, fluctuations in storage temperature, oxygen, enzymatic activities, etc.) which might lead to a premature deterioration of colour. The number and the pattern of the hydroxyl and methoxyl groups on the B-ring also affect the reactivity of the moiety. Cyanidin, delphinidin and petunidin have orto-di-phenolic groups which enhance susceptibility to oxidation . Methoxylated anthocyanins, such as peonidin and malvidin, are more stable. The relative number of hydroxyl and methoxyl groups also affects polarity and solubility of the corresponding anthocyanin in aqueous and hydro-alchoolic solutions such as must and wine, respectively.
The whole class of polyphenol compounds, including anthocyanins, present in red grapes and wines is regarded as a powerful source of ROS scavengers [23, 24]. However, the benefit for human health of each compound depends on its bioavailability and its antioxidant capacity. Dietary anthocyanins are adsorbed as intact 3-monoglucosides by a bilitranslocase in the epithelial cells of the gastric mucosa. For instance, the affinity of this carrier to each one of the five 3-monoglucoside anthocyanins varies within a 6-fold range . This greatly affects the biological value of food and beverages depending not only on their total anthocyanin content but also on their peculiar anthocyanin profile.
In this paper, we report on transcript-metabolite-phenotype relationships between anthocyanin genes, anthocyanins and berry colour across cultivars of Vitis vinifera. The regulation of six genes of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway (F3H, F3'H, F3'5'H, UFGT, OMT, GST) as well as four related transcription factors (MybA, MybB, MybC, MybD) were monitored at four stages of ripening. The correlation between gene transcriptional levels, anthocyanin content/profile and skin pigmentation was assayed in nine cultivars encompassing most of the extreme variation for berry colour known in naturally occurring grapevines.
Anthocyanin content in full ripe berries and cumulative gene expression of anthocyanin genes throughout ripening in nine cultivars
Total anthocyanins (mg g-1 skin)
% 3'4'-OH 3-G
% 3'4'5'-OH 3-G
% PN-3-G/3'4'-OH 3-G
% M-3-G/3'4'5'-OH 3-G
% PT-3-G/3'4'5'-OH 3-G
% (M-3-G + PT-3-G)/3'4'5'-OH 3-G
% (PN-3-G + PT-3-G + M-3-G)/3-G
The gene GST showed an expression pattern similar to that of UFGT (Figure 1C), even though the correlation between cumulative transcription throughout ripening and final amount of anthocyanins was slightly lower (R2 = 0.73) (Figure 1F). The cumulative transcription of F3H was also strongly correlated with the final anthocyanin content (R2 = 0.81) (Figure 1D). None of the four transcription factors MybA, MybB, MybC, and MybD showed strong correlation between cumulative transcription (Table 1) and total anthocyanin content at harvest (R2 < 0.52).
Anthocyanin profile at full maturity
The composition of 3-monoglucoside, acetyl-3-glucoside and p-coumaryl-3-glucoside anthocyanins in each cultivar is reported in Table 1. With regard to the acylation of the glycosyl group, non-acylated anthocyanins were the most abundant fraction in all cultivars except 'Gewürztraminer', in which acetyl-3-glucosides (50.6 %) predominated. The contribution of p-coumaryl forms was the lowest in all cultivars except 'Aglianico' and 'Tempranillo'. 'Pinot noir' was the only cultivar that synthesised exclusively monoglucoside (92.4 %) and acetyl-3-glucoside (7.6 %) anthocyanins, while p-coumaryl anthocyanins were not detected in the berry skin of this cultivar.
The contribution of each anthocyanin (cyanidin, peonidin, delphinidin, petunidin, malvidin) to the final anthocyanin profile was calculated based on the monoglucoside forms and is expressed as percentage in Table 1. Malvidin was the most abundant anthocyanin in all cultivars that had a prevalence of tri-hydroxylated anthocyanins. By contrast, among the cultivars that had a predominance of di-hydroxylated anthocyanins, peonidin was the most abundant in 'Grignolino', 'Moscato rosa' and 'Nebbiolo', while cyanidin was the most abundant in 'Gewürztraminer'.
Hydroxylation of the B-ring and evolution of anthocyanin composition during ripening
Methoxylation of the B-ring
Anthocyanin pigmented grapes appear in many stunning colour variations. In spite of the invariable presence of all anthocyanin biosynthetic genes in any investigated cultivar, a genotype-specific regulation of the genes along the core pathway and at the main branching points is presumed to underlie the observed quantitative variation in anthocyanin content and the red-to-blue shift in anthocyanin pigmentation . In the experiment presented in this paper, differences in anthocyanin pigmentation across fruit of nine grapevine cultivars are attributable to variations of the peculiar pattern of expression for the global set of anthocyanin genes. Gene expression of F3H, UFGT, OMT, GST strongly increased at véraison in all cultivars except for the non-pigmented 'Sauvignonasse', and the palely pigmented 'Gewürztraminer' and 'Pinot gris'. In the latter two palely pigmented cultivars, the levels of transcripts remained low although detectable throughout ripening. Striking differences were also observed in the regulation of flavonoid hydroxylases. Expression profile of F3'H was relatively high even before the onset of anthocyanin biosynthesis, and transcripts of this gene were present after véraison in all cultivars, also including the white cultivar 'Sauvignonasse'. By contrast, transcription of F3'5'H was developmentally activated after the onset of véraison in 'Aglianico', 'Tempranillo' and 'Pinot noir', the cultivars that synthesise mostly 3'4'5'-hydroxylated anthocyanins and bear blue-skinned berries, while it remained at lower levels in the red cultivars and was not transcribed at all in 'Sauvignonasse'. Cumulative mRNAs of F3H and UFGT throughout ripening and relative abundance of F3'5'H to UFGT and of OMT to UFGT explained per se large part of the phenotypic variation for anthocyanin content, anthocyanin composition, colour intensity and colour hue of grapes at berry maturity. Most regulation of the flavonoid pathway has been shown to occur at transcriptional level also in pigmented organs other than fruit in other species [1, 6, 27, 28]. In Z. mays kernels, the entire flavonoid pathway from chalcone synthase downwards is simultaneously regulated by Myb type and basic helix-loop-helix transcriptional factors; in A. majus floral organs, the anthocyanin pathway is regulated as a block from the gene F3H downwards; in P. hybrida flowers, the pathway is regulated as a unit from the gene DFR downwards. In grapevines, the main control point for anthocyanin quantitative variation is downstream in the pathway at the UFGT level in agreement with the early observations by , but the variation in anthocyanin composition is finely tuned upstream of UFGT at the level of flavonoid hydroxylases (F3'H and F3'5'H) and downstream of UFGT at the level of O-methyltransferase. This would reflect a higher specialisation in partitioning flavonoid intermediates towards different classes of end-products (flavonols, catechins, various anthocyanins) which accumulate in the same tissue during different stages of berry development.
We have shown that colour variation in the grape fruit is directly dependent on changes in mRNA levels of the global set of anthocyanin enzymatic genes. Also in other species, mostly ornamentals, shifts in flower colour across genotypes are more frequently associated with changes in regulation of gene expression rather than with structural mutations that result in altered protein activity [30, 31]. Variation in the expression of enzymatic genes might ultimately depend on regulatory genes that control transcription of some or all structural genes or on variation of cis-acting elements of the target structural genes that respond to the regulators . We analysed gene expression of four Myb-type transcription factors known in grape, including the MybA gene that controls the transcriptional activation of UFGT . The cumulative expression of none of the four transcription factors was sufficient per se to explain the quantitative variation in anthocyanin content, which probably conceals the presence of additional factors involved in the process. The synthesis of different classes of flavonoid compounds from common precursors occurs in the same cells within the grape skin. Hence, the few anthocyanin transcription factors investigated so far in grape may represent only the tip of the iceberg of a more complex regulatory network of the flavonoid pathway. Like in other species, it is possible that other Myb-type and basic helix-loop-helix transcriptional factors and WD40 proteins might differentially modulate the expression of structural genes of the early and late steps, of the core backbone and of side branches of the pathway, at different developmental stages and in different genotypes.
Natural phenotypic differences offered us the opportunity to follow up the role of anthocyanin genes that lead to extreme colorations in grapes. We traced the determination of berry colour from the phenotypic level down to the transcriptional level through the metabolite level. The regulation of the anthocyanin pathway was peculiar to each cultivar. By following the expression profile from the onset of véraison till full maturity, it was possible to associate anthocyanin metabolites and discrete colour phenotypes with transcriptional profiles of structural genes. Further investigations are required to identify the suite of changes in regulatory elements across cultivars. Thanks to the privilege of being the first fruit crop to have its genome sequenced  and owing to the economical impact of grape anthocyanins for enological worth (production of premium red wines), nutraceutical value (dietary polyphenols) and dye industry uses (natural colorants), grapevines may become the archetype for studying anthocyanin regulation in fruit just as petunias have been for studying anthocyanin regulation in flowers.
Vines were grown at the germplasm repository of Vivai Cooperativi Rauscedo, northeastern Italy (46° 04' N; 12° 50' E; 110 masl). Vines were trained to Sylvoz. Sampling was scheduled at four ripening stages: pre-véraison (on average at 4.2 °Brix of soluble solids and 37.1 g L-1 titratable acidity), mid-véraison (50 % of coloured berries in pigmented cutlivars or 50 % of softened berries in 'Sauvignonasse' and 'Gewürztraminer'), 100 % véraison, full maturity (on average at 17.4 °Brix of soluble solids and 7.4 g L-1titratable acidity). Due to different thermal requirements for reaching the same phenological stage in different cultivars, complete véraison occurred in a window of time from July 28th, 2005 in 'Moscato rosa' to September 2nd in 'Aglianico', 'Grignolino' and 'Nebbiolo' and technological maturity was reached from September 5th in 'Pinot Noir', 'Moscato rosa', 'Pinot gris', and 'Gewürztraminer' till October 4th in 'Aglianico' and 'Nebbiolo' [see Additional file 1]. At each stage, samples of 70 berries were collected for berry weight determination and colorimetric measurements. At mid-véraison, green berries were sampled separately from red berries on the same clusters. Berry colour was measured with an X-Rite 948 Chromameter (X-Rite). Colorimetric specification was referenced to the CIELab scale. Then, skin was peeled for anthocyanin extraction (see below) and pulp was used for quantifying total soluble solids and titratable acidity. Soluble solids were measured by a refractometer and expressed as °Brix, titratable acidity was expressed as tartaric acid equivalents. Forty more berries were sampled on the same clusters and peeled skins were used for RNA extraction.
Anthocyanin quantification and profiles
Anthocyanins were extracted for 4 hours from 200 mg of berry skin with 2 mL of methanol, then centrifuged and filtered with a 0.2 μm PTFE filter (Chemtek analitica). After methanol evaporation, anthocyanins were re-suspended with 100–400 μL of 27:73 methanol:perchloric acid 0.3% (v/v). Anthocyanins were separated by HPLC using a C18 Purospher RP-18 (5μm, 250 mm × 4 mm) column (Merck), according to the procedure reported by . Anthocyanin content was expressed as mg L-1 of malvidin 3-glucoside. The composition of monoglucoside anthocyanins was used for calculating the percentage of 3'4'-OH and 3'4'5'-OH derivatives and the percentage of methoxylated anthocyanins.
RNA extraction, DNase treatment and cDNA synthesis were performed as described in . Quantitative real-time PCR was carried out on a DNA Engine Opticon2 (MJ Research) using SYBR Green. Each reaction (20 μL) contained 200 nM each primer, 1:60 (or 1:240) diluted cDNA, 0.4 U of HotMaster Taq polymerase (Eppendorf), 4.0 mM Magnesium Acetate, 0.4 mM dNTPs and SYBR solution (Eppendorf). Thermal cycling conditions were 95°C for 3 min followed by 94°C for 15 s, 56°C for 20 s, and 68°C for 30 s for 40 cycles, followed by a melting cycle from 65°C to 95°C. Each cDNA sample was analysed at two different dilutions (1:60 and 1:240 of the original cDNA), each dilution run in duplicate. Gene transcripts were quantified upon normalisation to Ubiquitin conjugating factor by comparing the cycle threshold (CT) of the target gene with that of UbiCF (CF203457.1, primer forward 5'-CTATATGCTCGCTGCTGACG, primer reverse 5'-AAGCCAGGCAGAGACAACTC). Gene expression was calculated as overall mean and standard error among all dilutions and replicates. Primers pairs for UFGT were retrieved from , DWF1 from , GST from , F3H, F3'H, F3'5'H, OMT, MybA, MybB, MybC and MybD from .
Authors thank A. Pfeiffer, M. Degan, G. Comuzzo, R. Frezza, S. Nimissutti and S. Cantoni for technical work, R. Forti, F. Anaclerio and Vivai Cooperativi Rauscedo for providing plant material.
- Mol J, Grotewold E, Koes R: How genes paint flowers and seeds. Trends Plant Sci. 1998, 3: 212-217. 10.1016/S1360-1385(98)01242-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Winkel-Shirley B: A mutational approach to dissection of flavonoid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis . Recent Adv Phytochem. 2002, 36: 95-110.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Quattrocchio F, Wing JF, Leppen H, Mol J, Koes RE: Regulatory genes controlling anthocyanin pigmentation are functionally conserved among plant species and have distinct sets of target genes. Plant Cell. 1993, 5: 1497-1512. 10.1105/tpc.5.11.1497.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Spelt C, Quattrocchio F, Mol JN, Koes R: anthocyanin1 of petunia encodes a basic helix-loop-helix protein that directly activates transcription of structural anthocyanin genes. Plant Cell. 2000, 12: 1619-1632. 10.1105/tpc.12.9.1619.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martin C, Prescott A, Mackay S, Bartlett J, Vrijlandt E: Control of anthocyanin biosynthesis in flowers of Antirrhinum majus . Plant J. 1991, 1: 37-49. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.1991.00037.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Selinger DA, Chandler VL: A mutation in the pale aleurone color1 gene identifies a novel regulator of the maize anthocyanin pathway. Plant Cell. 1999, 11: 5-14. 10.1105/tpc.11.1.5.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jaakola L, Määttä K, Pirttilä AM, Törrönen R, Kärenlampi S, Hohtola A: Expression of genes involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis in relation to anthocyanin, proanthocyanidin, and flavonol levels during bilberry fruit development. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130: 729-739. 10.1104/pp.006957.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kobayashi S, Goto-Yamamoto N, Hirochika H: Retrotransposon-induced mutations in grape skin color. Science. 2004, 304: 982-10.1126/science.1095011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Walker AR, Lee E, Bogs J, McDavid DA, Thomas MR, Robinson SP: White grapes arose through the mutation of two similar and adjacent regulatory genes. Plant J. 2007, 49: 772-785. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02997.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Espley RV, Hellens RP, Putterill J, Stevenson DE, Kutty-Amma S, Allan AC: Red colouration in apple fruit is due to the activity of the MYB transcription factor, MdMYB10. Plant J. 2007, 49: 414-427. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02964.x.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Castellarin SD, Di Gaspero G, Marconi R, Nonis A, Peterlunger E, Paillard S, Adam-Blondon AF, Testolin R: Colour variation in red grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.): genomic organisation, expression of flavonoid 3'-hydroxylase, flavonoid 3',5'-hydroxylase genes and related metabolite profiling of red cyanidin-/blue delphinidin-based anthocyanins in berry skin. BMC Genomics. 2006, 7: 12-10.1186/1471-2164-7-12.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bogs J, Ebadi A, McDavid D, Robinson SP: Identification of the flavonoid hydroxylases from grapevine and their regulation during fruit development. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140: 279-291. 10.1104/pp.105.073262.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jeong ST, Goto-Yamamoto N, Hashizume K, Esaka M: Expression of the flavonoid 3'-hydroxylase and flavonoid 3',5'-hydroxylase genes and flavonoid composition in grape (Vitis vinifera). Plant Sci. 2006, 170: 61-69. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.07.025.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lijavetzky D, Ruiz-García L, Cabezas JA, De Andrés MT, Bravo G, Ibáñez A, Carreño J, Cabello F, Ibáñez J, Martínez-Zapater JM: Molecular genetics of berry colour variation in table grape. Mol Genet Genomics. 2006, 276: 427-435. 10.1007/s00438-006-0149-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- This P, Lacombe T, Cadle-Davidson M, Owens CL: Wine grape (Vitis vinifera L.) color associates with allelic variation in the domestication gene VvmybA1 . Theor Appl Genet. 2007, 114: 723-730. 10.1007/s00122-006-0472-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mattivi F, Guzzon R, Vrhovsek U, Stefanini M, Velasco R: Metabolite profiling of grapes: flavonols and anthocyanins. J Agric Food Chem. 2006, 54: 7692-7702. 10.1021/jf061538c.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pomar F, Novo M, Masa A: Varietal differences among the anthocyanin profiles of 50 red table grape cultivars studied by high performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2005, 1094: 34-41. 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.07.096.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Markham K: Distribution of flavonoids in the lower plants and its evolutionary significance. The flavonoids: advances in research since 1980. Edited by: Harborne J. 1988, New York: Academic Press, 427-468.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stafford HA: Flavonoid evolution: An enzymic approach. Plant Physiol. 1991, 96: 680-685.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Seitz C, Eder C, Deiml B, Kellner S, Martens S, Forkmann G: Cloning, functional identification and sequence analysis of flavonoid 3'-hydroxylase and flavonoid 3',5'-hydroxylase cDNAs revelas independent evolution of flavonoid hydroxylase in the Asteraceae family. Plant Mol Biol. 2006, 61: 365-381. 10.1007/s11103-006-0012-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Holton TA, Cornish E: Genetics and biochemistry of anthocyanin biosynthesis. Plant Cell. 1995, 7: 1071-1083. 10.1105/tpc.7.7.1071.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sroka Z: Antioxidative and antiradical properties of plant phenolics. Z Naturforsch. 2005, 60: 833-843.Google Scholar
- Hou D, Fujiii M, Terahara N, Yoshimoto M: Molecular mechanisms behind the chemopreventive effects of anthocyanins. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2004, 5: 321-325. 10.1155/S1110724304403040.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rodrigo R, Bosco C: Oxidative stress and protective effects of polyphenols: comparative studies in human and rodent kidney. A review. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2006, 142: 317-327. 10.1016/j.cbpc.2005.11.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Passamonti S, Vrhovsek U, Mattivi F: The interaction of anthocyanins with bilitranslocase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002, 296: 631-636. 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)00927-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ageorges A, Fernandez L, Vialet S, Merdinoglu D, Terrier N, Romieu C: Four specific isogenes of the anthocyanin metabolic pathway are systematically co-expressed with the red colour of grape berries. Plant Sci. 2006, 170: 372-383. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.09.007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Quattrocchio F, Wing J, van der Woude K, Souer E, de Vetten N, Mol J, Koes R: Molecular analysis of the anthocyanin2 gene of petunia and its role in the evolution of flower color. Plant Cell. 1999, 11: 1433-1444. 10.1105/tpc.11.8.1433.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schwinn K, Venail J, Shang Y, Mackay S, Alm V, Butelli E, Oyama R, Bailey P, Davies K, Martin C: A small family of MYB-regulatory genes controls floral pigmentation intensity and patterning in the genus Antirrhinum . Plant Cell. 2006, 18: 831-851. 10.1105/tpc.105.039255.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boss PK, Davies C, Robinson SP: Analysis of the expression of anthocyanin pathway genes in developing Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz grape berries and the implications for the pathway regulation. Plant Physiol. 1996, 111: 1059-1066.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Clegg MT, Durbin ML: Tracing floral adaptations from ecology to molecules. Nat Rev Genet. 2003, 4: 206-215. 10.1038/nrg1023.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Whittall JB, Voelckel C, Kliebenstein DJ Hodges SA: Convergence, constraint and the role of gene expression during adaptive radiation: floral anthocyanins in Aquilegia . Mol Ecol. 2006, 15: 4645-4657. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03114.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Quattrocchio F, Wing JF, van der Woude K, Mol JN, Koes R: Analysis of bHLH and MYB domain proteins: species-specific regulatory differences are caused by divergent evolution of target anthocyanin genes. Plant J. 1998, 13: 475-488. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1998.00046.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jaillon O, Aury J-M, Noel B, Policriti A, Clepet C, Casagrande A, Choisne N, Aubourg S, Vitulo N, Jubin C, Vezzi A, Legeai F, Hugueney P, Dasilva C, Horner D, Mica E, Jublot D, Poulain J, Bruyère C, Billault A, Segurens B, Gouyvenoux M, Ugarte E, Cattonaro F, Anthouard V, Vico V, Del Fabbro C, Alaux M, Di Gaspero G, Dumas V, Felice N, Paillard S, Juman I, Moroldo M, Scalabrin S, Canaguier A, Le Clainche I, Malacrida G, Durand E, Pesole G, Laucou V, Chatelet P, Merdinoglu D, Delledonne M, Pezzotti M, Lecharny A, Scarpelli C, Artiguenave F, Pè ME, Valle G, Morgante M, Caboche M, Adam-Blondon A-F, Weissenbach J, Quétier F, Wincker P: The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature06148Google Scholar
- Goto-Yamamoto N, Wan GH, Masaki K, Kobayashi S: Structure and transcription of three chalcone synthase genes of grapevine (Vitis vinifera). Plant Sci. 2002, 162: 867-872. 10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00042-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Symons GM, Davies C, Shavrukov Y, Dry IB, Reid JB, Thomas MR: Grapes on steroids. Brassinosteroids are involved in grape berry ripening. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140: 150-158. 10.1104/pp.105.070706.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Terrier N, Glissant D, Grimplet J, Barrieu F, Abbal P, Couture C, Ageorges A, Atanassova R, Leon C, Renaudin JP, Dedaldechamp F, Romieu C, Delrot S, Hamdi S: Isogene specific oligo arrays reveal multifaceted changes in gene expression during grape berry (Vitis vinifera L.) development. Planta. 2005, 222: 832-847. 10.1007/s00425-005-0017-y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.