Volume 5 Supplement 1

Cell Biology of Nitric Oxide and Cell Death in Plants

Open Access

Nocodazole provokes an apoptosis in isopropyl-N-phenyl carbamate resistant and sensitive Nicotianalines but in two different ways

  • Alla I Yemets1,
  • Oksana A Stel'makh1 and
  • Yaroslav B Blume1
BMC Plant Biology20055(Suppl 1):S37

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-5-S1-S37

Published: 31 May 2005

Background

Microtubules are highly dynamic assemblies of the protein tubulin. Their dynamic behaviour is crucial to mitosis, the process of chromosomal division to form new cells. Microtubule dynamics are highly regulated during the cell cycle by endogenous cellular regulators. In addition, many antimitotic drugs and natural compounds alter the polymerisation dynamics of microtubules, blocking mitosis, and consequently, inducing cell death by apoptosis [1]. The drugs bind to diverse sites on tubulin and at different positions within the microtubule, and they have diverse effects on microtubule dynamics. However, by their common mechanism of suppression microtubule dynamics, they all block mitosis at the metaphase/anaphase transition, and induce cell death. After treatment with different anti-tubulin drugs, it was also demonstrated that apoptosis occurs either in the interphase or in mitosis depending on the cell type and experimental conditions [2, 3].

The relationship between cell cycle disturbance due to the use of these agents and apoptosis is poorly understood. Insight into the binding and mode of action of most of antimitotic drugs have been obtained by the identification and mapping of mutation in appropriate resistant lines. Unfortunately, up to now there is no strong evidence about mode of action N-phenyl carbamates, effective anti-mitotic herbicides. Although, recently it was shown that phenylcarbamates and benzimidazoles, can compete for the site(s) of binding on β-tubulin. Benzimidazoles interact very specifically with different eukaryotic β-tubulin and resistance to these anti-microtubule drugs may be caused by point mutations in β-tubulin which replace Glu-198 with either Ala, Asp, Gln, Lys, Val, or Gly, or which replace Phe-200 with Tyr [4]. As it was found amino acid substitutions in position 198 of fungal β-tubulin, lead to negative cross-resistance to phenylcarbamates, but changes Phe from Leu-250, Val from Ala-165, and Ala from Thr-237 are responsible for phenylcarbamate cross-ressistance [5]. To clarify the sensitive/resistance of isopropyl-N-phenylcarbamate (IPC) resistant N. sylvestris mutants [6] to benzimidazole the influence of different concentration of nocodazole and its diverse effects on microtubule dynamics and cell cycle progression were studied. Two different apoptotic responses and patterns in control and mutant lines were found after nocodazole treatments.

Materials and methods

Nocodazole (Sigma) was dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and stored at -20°C. The final DMSO concentration during nocodazole treatments did not exceed 0.5%. Only 0.5% DMSO was added to control samples. The root cells of control and IPC-resistant mutant N. sylvestris lines were exposured with nocodazole at various concentrations (0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 100, and 500 MkM) for 24 h, and then fixed in an ethanol/acetic acid mixture (3:1) for 12 h. For chromosome counting and classification of mitotic figures, slides, were stained with acetoorcein (1% solution in 45% acetic acid) for 24 h and examined. Cell were counted and analysed at magnification of 1000X on Carl Zeiss light microscope.

Results

In both control and IPC-resistant N. sylvestris lines various nocodazole concentration treatments led not only to increase the mitotic indexes from about 7% to ~12–13%, but also resulted in an appearance of mitotic figure disturbances during different phases of mitotic division (see Table 1 and Table 2). No any disturbances were found in prophases of IPC-resistant plants after drug effects, whereas nocodazole in concentration from 10 to 500 MkM revealed them in control plant cells on dose-depended manner (Table 1). It was found that metaphases of both lines were more sensitive to nocodazole treatments, but nevertheless the per cent of disturbances in metaphases, anaphases and telophases was about in two-three times more in control line as compare to mutant one (see Table 1 and 2).
Table 1

Results of different nocodazole concentration effects on cell cycle progression of control N. sylvestris line:

NZ, MM

MI, %

Σ analysed cells, number

Σ dividing cells, number

Mitotic phases

    

Prophase, % in all /disturbances

Metaphase, % in all /disturbances

Anaphase, % in all /disturbances

Telophase, % in all /disturbances

500

11.58

7022

813

32.84

18.33

35.19

31.86

18.77

16.48

13.16

10.95

100

10.66

7358

784

44.39

4.41

30.31

27.04

15.60

12.88

9.73

7.78

50

9.98

7014

699

51.22

2.88

28.31

24.61

12.01

9.16

8.44

6.01

10

9.72

6129

596

57.72

0.40

25.50

17.11

9.73

5.54

7.08

3.36

1

8.93

6174

551

60.62

0

23.05

14.70

9.26

4.54

7.01

2.90

0.1

7.68

7412

569

67.66

0

17.58

7.73

8.26

1.58

6.51

0.88

0.01

7.65

7062

540

74.23

0

15.19

2.04

4.63

0

5.93

0

0

7.54

7135

538

60.04

0

20.22

0

8.36

0

11.35

0

NZ = nocodazole, MI = mitotic index, % of disturbances in each mitotic phase was calculated as % from total number of dividing cells.

Table 2

Results of different nocodazole concentration effects on cell cycle progression of IPC-resistant N. sylvestris line:

NZ, MM

MI, %

Σ analysed cells, number

Σ dividing cells, number

Mitotic phases

    

Prophase, % in all / disturbances

Metaphase, % in all / disturbances

Anaphase, % in all / disturbances

Telophase, % In all / disturbances

500

13.54

7045

954

56.18

0

21.11

19.49

12.17

10.79

10.57

8.49

100

12.03

7748

932

66.42

0

15.67

14.16

9.72

8.15

8.18

6.22

50

10.73

7036

755

72.05

0

14.82

8.21

7.39

3.05

5.66

2.65

10

10.27

6198

636

76.89

0

12.26

6.13

6.13

2.04

4.72

1.89

1

9.98

6156

614

82.89

0

9.33

3.91

4.65

1.47

3.22

0.49

0.1

8.52

7015

597

85.93

0

8.67

3.18

2.59

0.34

2.77

0.34

0.01

7.23

7098

513

89.28

0

7.53

0

1.22

0

1.99

0

0

6.67

7159

478

74.48

0

17.51

0

4.81

0

3.06

0

NZ = nocodazole, MI = mitotic index, % of disturbances in each mitotic phase was calculated as % from total number of dividing cells.

It was found also that different nocodazole concentrations rapidly induced apoptotic processes in both control and mutant lines, but cell responses after nocodazole treatments were completely different. Even low concentration of nocodazole (0.1–10 MkM) induced nuclear DNA damage: chromatin recondensation and DNA fragmentation in prophases, metaphases and anaphases of control plant cells (see Figure 1). Whereas high level of nocodazole (100–500 MkM) induced total DNA fragmentation on all stages of cell cycle including interphase.
Figure 1

Mitotic figures in sensitive N. sylvestris lines after treatment of nocodazole in various concentrations: (a) 0.1 MkM nocodazole treatment; (b-c) 1 MkM nocodazole treatment; (d-f) 10 MkM nocodazole treatment. Bar: 1 cm = 1000 mm.

At concentration of 0.1 MkM nocodazole effected significantly metaphases only in IPC-resistant plant cells. It was found that in the cells of mutant lines treatment of low nocodazole level (0.1–1 MkM) resulted in chromosome delay during chromosome segregation in metaphase, 10 MkM nocodazole treatment induced an appearance of C-mitosis, chromosome delay and chromosome-bridges formation in different phases of mitosis (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Mitotic figures in IPC-resistant N. sylvestris lines after treatment of nocodazole in various concentrations: (a-b) 1 MkM nocodazole treatment; (c-d) 10 MkM nocodazole treatment; (e) 100 MkM nocodazole treatment. Bar: 1 cm = 1000 mm.

High levels of nocodazole (100–500 MkM) resulted in dramatic alterations in the cells – C-mitosis, aberrant spindle formation with consequent more frequent anomalous situations (for example, multipolar mitoses, and as a result of this, an appearance of star anaphases). No any DNA fragmentation was observed in IPC-resistant lines after any concentration of nocodazole treatment.

Conclusion

It is well known that treatment of cells with nocodazole and other microtubule-interfering agents evokes the activation of stress response pathways, cell cycle arrest, and the induction of apoptosis. Early, nocodazole was frequently used to examine the role of microtubules in vesicle transport [7], to induction of polyploidy [8], aneuploidy [9], and certainly to study an apoptosis in different cells [813]. Very often nocodazole effects result in DNA fragmentation, one hallmark of apoptosis. In our data nocodazole treatments revealed DNA fragmentation in control, sensitive to IPC, N. sylvestris line only. It was not found any DNA fragmentation in mutant plan cells after nocodazole exposure. Nevertheless, cell death was observed in both lines.

We established that nocodazole increased the mitotic index in both lines but it also enhanced an apoptotic response. These results are coincided with data obtained early on animal cells [10]. We also found that IPC-resistant N. sylvestris mutant cells possessed less sensitivity to nocodazole treatments that control N. sylvestris plant since it was established that the per cents of disturbances in metaphases, anaphases and telophases were about in two-three times more in N. sylvestris control line as compare with mutant one. Microtubules in prophase of mutant plant cells were resistant to all used nocodazole concentrations. As it was shown there were no disturbances on this stage of mitosis in IPC-resistant plants. However, all revealed disturbances in metaphase, anaphase and telophase, in mutant testify about cell suicide program after this drug effect.

Thus, we can summarize that IPC-resistant plant cells are more resistant to nocodazole than that of control line. Nocodazole in concentration from 0.1 to 500 MkM evokes clear apoptosis in control N. sylvestris plant cells characterizing in mitotic arrests and DNA fragmentation. It provokes also cell death process in IPC-resistant cells, but on another distinct way of cell degradation. It is possible to conclude that the same nocodazole treatments could induce, in two different plant lines, cytostatic effects followed by probably two different patterns of plant death. Recently, two different patterns of cell death were also found on two different cell animal lines after same antimicrotubular drug effects [3]. It has already been reported early that nocodazole possesses pleiotropic effects that are independent of microtubules [7], or probably different apoptotic responses depend from cell types as it was indicated by us above.

It is possible to presume that the higher apoptotic rate in control plant cells after nocodazole treatments may be also a consequence of absence mutant microtubule protein(s) or mutant microtubule associated protein(s) which confer(s) resistance to IPC in N. sylvestris mutant lines. Experiments on nocodazole effects on cells of model plant lines are continuing now.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Genomics and Biotechnology, Institute of Cell Biology and Genetic Engineering, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

References

  1. Mollinedo F, Gajate C: Microtubules, microtubule-interfering agents and apoptosis. Apoptosis. 2003, 8: 413-450. 10.1023/A:1025513106330.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Tsuchida T, Yoshimura K, Shirayama Y, Kawamoto K: Colcemid-induced apoptosis of cultured human glioma: electron microscopic and confocal laser microscopic observation of cells sorted in different phases of cell cycle. Cytometry. 1998, 31: 295-299. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19980401)31:4<295::AID-CYTO9>3.0.CO;2-I.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Sciola L, Spano A, Monaco G, Bottone MG, Barni S: Different apoptotic responses and patterns in adhering and floating neoplastic cell cultures: effects of microtubule antagonists. Histochem Cell Biol. 2003, 119: 77-90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Davidse LC, Ishi H: Biochemical and molecular aspects of the mechanisms of action of benzimidazole, N-phenylcarbamates and N-phenylformamidoximes and the mechanisms of resistance to these compounds in fungi. Antifungal Agents – Discovery and Mode of Action. Edited by: Dixon GK, Copping LG, Hollomon DW. BIOS Scientific Publishers Ltd; 1995:305-321.Google Scholar
  5. Fujimura M, Kamakura T, Inoue H, Yamaguchi I: Amino-acid alterations in the beta-tubulin gene of Neurospora crassa that confer resistance to carbendazim and diethofencarb. Curr Genet. 1994, 25: 418-22. 10.1007/BF00351780.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Yemets A, Stelmakh O, Kundelchuk O, Blume YaB: Obtaining and analysis of isopropyl-N-phenyl carbamate resistant lines of Nicotiana species. Cell Biol Int. 2003, 27: 307-310. 10.1016/S1065-6995(02)00348-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Molero JC, Whitehead JP, Meerloo T, James DE: Nocodazole inhibits insulin-stimulated glucose transport in 3T3-L1 adipocytes via a microtubule-independent mechanism. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 43829-43835. 10.1074/jbc.M105452200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Verdoodt B, Decordier I, Geleyns K, Cunha M, Cundari E, Kirsch-Volders M: Induction of polyploidy and apoptosis after exposure to high concentrations of the spindle poison nocodazole. Mutagenesis. 1999, 14: 513-520. 10.1093/mutage/14.5.513.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Decordier I, Dillen L, Cundari E, Kirsch-Volders M: Elimination of micronucleated cells by apoptosis after treatment with inhibitors of microtubule. Mutagenesis. 2002, 17: 337-344. 10.1093/mutage/17.4.337.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bumbasirevic V, Skaro-Milic A, Mircic A, Djuricic B: Apoptosis induced by microtubule disrupting drugs in normal murine thymocytes in vitro. Scanning Microsc. 1995, 9: 509-516.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ikegami R, Zhang J, Rivera-Bennetts AK, Yager TD: Activation of the metaphase checkpoint and an apoptosis programme in the early zebrafish embryo, by treatment with the spindle-destabilisin agent nocodazole. Zygote. 1997, 5: 329-350.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kook S, Shim SR, Kim JI, Ahnn JH, Jung YK, Paik SG, Song WK: Degradation of focal adhesion proteins during nocodazole-induced apoptosis in rat-1 cells. Cell Biochem Funct. 2000, 18: 1-7. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0844(200001/03)18:1<1::AID-CBF840>3.0.CO;2-N.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhang H, Shi X, Zhang Q-J, Hampong M, Paddon H, Wahyuningsih D, Pelech S: Nocodazole-induced p53-dependent c-Jun N-terminal kinase activation reduces apoptosis in human colon carcinoma HCT116 cells. J Biol Chem. 2002, 227: 43648-43658. 10.1074/jbc.M203214200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2005

Advertisement