Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Plant Biology

Open Access

An evaluation of the effects of exogenous ethephon, an ethylene releasing compound, on photosynthesis of mustard (Brassica juncea) cultivars that differ in photosynthetic capacity

BMC Plant Biology20044:21

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-4-21

Received: 30 August 2004

Accepted: 30 December 2004

Published: 30 December 2004

Abstract

Background

The stimulatory effect of CO2 on ethylene evolution in plants is known, but the extent to which ethylene controls photosynthesis is not clear. Studies on the effects of ethylene on CO2 metabolism have shown conflicting results. Increase or inhibition of photosynthesis by ethylene has been reported. To understand the physiological processes responsible for ethylene-mediated changes in photosynthesis, stomatal and mesophyll effects on photosynthesis and ethylene biosynthesis in response to ethephon treatment in mustard (Brassica juncea) cultivars differing in photosynthetic capacity were studied.

Results

The effects of ethephon on photosynthetic rate (PN), stomatal conductance (gS), carbonic anhydrase (CA) activity, 1-aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid synthase (ACS) activity and ethylene evolution were similar in both the cultivars. Increasing ethephon concentration up to 1.5 mM increased PN, gS and CA maximally, whereas 3.0 mM ethephon proved inhibitory. ACS activity and ethylene evolution increased with increasing concentrations of ethephon. The corresponding changes in gs and CA activity suggest that the changes in photosynthesis in response to ethephon were triggered by altered stomatal and mesophyll processes. Stomatal conductance changed in parallel with changes in mesophyll photosynthetic properties. In both the cultivars ACS activity and ethylene increased up to 3.0 mM ethephon, but 1.5 mM ethephon caused maximum effects on photosynthetic parameters.

Conclusion

These results suggest that ethephon affects foliar gas exchange responses. The changes in photosynthesis in response to ethephon were due to stomatal and mesophyll effects. The changes in gS were a response maintaining stable intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) under the given treatment in both the cultivars. Also, the high photosynthetic capacity cultivar, Varuna responded less to ethephon than the low photosynthetic capacity cultivar, RH30. The photosynthetic capacity of RH30 increased with the increase in ethylene evolution due to 1.5 mM ethephon application.

Background

Photosynthesis is controlled by several intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Of these, plant hormones have received considerable attention in the past in photosynthetic responses of plants. Ethylene is a phytohormone that influences every aspect of plant growth and development [1]. It is synthesized by the activity of 1-aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid synthase (ACS). The response of plants to ethylene depends on the sensitivity of plants to the gas. Conflicting results on the effects of ethylene-releasing compounds on net photosynthetic rate (PN) have been reported. It has been shown to increase PN [27] or decrease it [8, 9], but no definite reason has been assigned for this. It has been shown that the increase in PN with ethylene-releasing compounds was due to the increase in chlorophyll per unit leaf area [10] or by greater light interception [11]. In my earlier report it has been shown that alteration in photosynthesis was due to the changes in ACS activity [12]. The goal of this work was to compare stomatal and mesophyll effects on PN in response to ethephon treatment. For that, PN, stomatal conductance (gS) and carbonic anhydrase (CA) activity were recorded. To find a possible relationship of ethylene-mediated changes in foliar gas exchange parameters, activity of ACS and ethylene evolution were also determined. The work was carried out in two cultivars of mustard previously shown to have different photosynthetic capacity [12].

Results

The effects of ethephon on PN, gS and CA were found significant in both the cultivars (Figures 1, 2). Ethephon at 1.5 mM increased the characteristics maximally, increasing PN by 31.8 and 41.8%, gS by 15.0 and 17.1% and CA by 84.6 and 71.4% in Varuna and RH30, respectively. Higher concentration of ethephon (3.0 mM) decreased the characteristics in both the cultivars. The ratio of intercellular to ambient CO2 concentration (Ci/Ca) was constant.
Figure 1

Effects of ethephon on photosynthesis and stomatal conductance in mustard Effect of different concentrations of ethephon (2-chloroethyl phosphonic acid) applied at 30 d after sowing on net photosynthetic rate (PN) (A) and stomatal conductance (gS) (B) in high photosynthetic capacity cultivar Varuna and low photosynthetic capacity cultivar RH30 of mustard (Brassica juncea) at 15 d after the treatment. Each data point represent treatment mean ± SE. Values at each data point within the cultivar sharing the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05.

Figure 2

Effects of ethephon on intercellular CO 2 concentration and carbonic anhydrase activity in mustard Effect of different concentrations of ethephon (2-chloroethyl phosphonic acid) applied at 30 d after sowing on intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) (A) and carbonic anhydrase (CA) activity (B) in high photosynthetic capacity cultivar Varuna and low photosynthetic capacity cultivar RH30 of mustard (Brassica juncea) at 15 d after the treatment. Each data point represent treatment mean ± SE. Values at each data point within the cultivar sharing the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05.

Ethephon application significantly affected ACS activity and ethylene evolution, and were greatest with 3.0 mM ethephon (Table 1). Low photosynthetic capacity cultivar, RH30 was more responsive to ethephon than the high photosynthetic capacity cultivar, Varuna. Application of 1.5 mM ethephon increased ethylene by 52.6% in Varuna and 75.0% in RH30. Increase in ethylene with 1.5 mM ethephon was associated with the increase in PN, gS and CA. Ethylene evolution with 3.0 mM ethephon proved inhibitory for photosynthetic parameters.
Table 1

Effects of different concentrations of ethephon (2-chloroethyl phosphonic acid) applied at 30 d after sowing on the activity of 1-aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid synthase (ACS; (ng ACC kg-1 leaf (FM) s-1) and ethylene evolution (ng kg-1 leaf (FM) s-1) in two cultivars of mustard (Brassica juncea) at 15 d after the treatment. Values ± SE. Data followed by the same letter within a column are significantly not different.

Ethephon Treatments (mM)

High photosynthetic capacity cultivar (Varuna)

Low photosynthetic capacity cultivar (RH 30)

 

ACS

Ethylene

ACS

Ethylene

0

62.2 ± 5.4c

3.8 ± 0.2c

40.8 ± 3.6c

2.4 ± 0.2c

0.75

64.6 ± 5.8c

4.4 ± 0.3bc

44.4 ± 4.0c

3.2 ± 0.2bc

1.5

68.2 ± 5.8b

5.8 ± 0.3b

52.8 ± 4.6b

4.2 ± 0.3b

3.0

73.5 ± 6.0a

7.0 ± 0.5a

62.3 ± 5.6a

6.0 ± 0.4a

Discussion

Maximum rates of photosynthesis were found with 1.5 mM ethephon. The increase in PN due to ethephon has been reported [46]. Increased gs and CA values in both the cultivars showed stomatal and mesophyll effects on photosynthesis. Mesophyll effects are characterized as a product of CO2 binding capacity and the electron transport capacity. The carboxylation capacity determines the mesophyll effects [13, 14]. Increase in CA activity at the site of CO2 fixation exhibited the enhanced carboxylation reaction [1517]. The changes in stomatal conductance due to ethephon were to maintain stable intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) under the given treatment. Thus, stomatal and mesophyll processes contributed to the increase in PN in response to ethephon. The ethephon-induced effects on photosynthetic parameters were mediated by ethylene evolved due to ethephon treatment. Taylor and Gunderson [18] showed a relationship between ethylene-enhanced gS and ethylene-enhanced PN. Higher concentration of ethephon (3.0 mM) decreased the PN and gS. Such condition of inhibition of PN by ethylene-releasing compound has been observed by Kays and Pallas [8] and Rajala and Peltonen-Sainio [9]. In all these studies ethylene has been attributed to the changes in PN due to its effect on gS. Mattoo and White [19] reported that ethylene affected CO2 assimilation and the plant responded depending on the tissue concentration. On the similar lines, Dhawan et al. [20], Kao and Yang [21] and Grodzinski et al. [22] reasoned that decrease in CO2 regulated PN and was related to ethylene evolution. In the present study, low photosynthetic cultivar, RH30 responded more to ethephon than the high photosynthetic cultivar, Varuna. In control plants, lesser ethylene evolution in RH30 than Varuna was responsible for lesser PN. As the ethylene evolution increased with ethephon application, the capacity of RH30 for PN also increased resulting in higher per cent increase in PN than the Varuna. An increase of 75% ethylene in RH30 due to 1.5 mM ethephon increased PN by 41.8%, whereas 52.6% increase in ethylene in Varuna due to the same treatment increased PN by 31.8%. Earlier strong positive correlation between ACS activity and PN has been shown [12].

It therefore, appears possible that the threshold value for ethylene with 1.5 mM ethephon was comparable to that which elicits the ethylene-mediated hormonal responses, which differ with the cultivars inherent capacity of physiological processes. It is that there is some requirement of ethylene for optimum response. Low and high concentration represent the two ends of an optimum curve, promoting at low concentration and inhibiting at high.

Conclusions

This study shows that ethephon affects PN in both high and low photosynthetic capacity cultivars, Varuna and RH30. In both the cultivars, changes in PN were due to stomatal and mesophyll effects. Ethephon-induced PN was attributed to ethylene evolution. The high photosynthetic capacity cultivar, Varuna responded less to ethephon than the low photosynthetic capacity cultivar, RH30. The low PN of RH30 was due to low level of ethylene. The low photosynthetic capacity of RH30 could be enhanced to give higher PN through increase in ethylene evolution. However, for both the cultivars there is a range of physiologically active concentration of ethylene beyond which it exerts inhibitory effects.

Methods

Two cultivars of mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern & Coss.), namely Varuna (high photosynthetic capacity) and RH30 (low photosynthetic capacity) were grown from seeds in 10 m2 field plots in complete randomized design with five replications. At seedling establishment a plant population of 12 plants m-2 was maintained and recommended plant cultivation procedures were adopted. A uniform recommended soil application of 18 g N, 3 g P and 3 g K m-2 was given at the time of sowing so as the nutrients were non-limiting.

At 30 d after sowing, 0, 0.75, 1.5 and 3.0 mM ethephon (2-chloroethyl phosphonic acid) was sprayed with a hand sprayer. Ethephon is a direct ethylene source when applied to plants and elicits response identical to those induced by ethylene gas [23, 24]. Since ethephon on hydrolysis releases ethylene and phosphorus, therefore equivalent amount of phosphorus present in 3.0 mM ethephon was given to all treatments including control to nullify the effects of phosphorus.

At 45 d after sowing (15 d after ethephon treatment) PN, gS, Ci, CA activity, ACS activity and ethylene evolution were determined.

Measurement of photosynthetic parameters

PN, gS and Ci were measured using infrared gas analyzer (LiCOR 6200, Lincoln, NE) on fully expanded upper most leaves at saturating light intensity on four plants from each replicate. The atmospheric conditions during the experiment between 1100–1200 h were: photosynthetic active radiation about 1050 μmol m-2 s-1, relative humidity 64% and temperature 23°C, atmospheric CO2 concentration 360 μmol mol-1.

Measurement of carbonic anhydrase activity

The leaves used for photosynthesis measurement were selected for CA activity determination. CA was measured by the method of Dwivedi and Randhava [25]. Leaves were cut into small pieces in 10 mL of 0.2 M cystein at 4°C. The solution adhering to the leaf surface was removed and immediately transferred to a tube having 4 mL phosphate buffer (pH 6.8). A 4 mL of 0.2 M sodium bicarbonate in 0.002 M sodium hydroxide and 0.2 mL of 0.002% bromothymol blue was added to the tube. The tubes were kept at 4°C for 20 min after shaking. Liberated CO2 during the catalytic action of enzyme on sodium bicarbonate was estimated by titrating the reaction mixture against 0.05 N hydrochloric acid.

Measurement of ACS activity and ethylene evolution

Activity of ACS was measured adopting the methods of Avni et al. [26] and Woeste et al. [27]. Leaf tissue was grind in 100 mM N-2 hydroxyethylenepiperazine N-2 ethanesulfonic acid buffer (pH 8.0) containing 4 mM dithiothreitol, 2.5 mM pyridoxal phosphate and 25% polyvinylpolypyrrolidone. The preparation was homogenized and centrifuged at 12000 g for 15 min. One mL of the supernatant was placed in a 30 mL tube and 0.1 mL of 5 mM S-adenosyl methionine (AdoMet) was added. This was incubated for 1 h at 22°C. The 1-aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid formed was determined by its conversion to ethylene by the addition of 0.1 mL of 20 mM HgCl2 followed by 0.1 mL of 1:1 mixture of saturated NaOH/NaCl and incubated on ice for 10 min, and ethylene evolution was measured on a gas chromatograph. For control set AdoMet was not added. For ethylene evolution 5 mL of gas phase was removed with a syringe and ethylene was measured on a gas chromatograph (GC 5700, Nucon, New Delhi) equipped with 1.8 m Porapack N (80/100 mesh) column, a flame ionization detector and an integrator. Nitrogen was used as carrier gas. The flow rates of nitrogen, hydrogen and oxygen were 0.5, 0.5 and 5 mL s-1, respectively. The oven temperature was 100°C and detector was at 150°C. Ethylene identification was based on the retention time and quantified comparing with the peaks from standard ethylene concentrations.

Data analysis

Data were analyzed statistically and standard error of the mean value was calculated. Analysis of variance was performed to identify the significant differences among treatments at P < 0.05 [28].

Abbrevations

Adomet: 

S-adenosyl methionine

ACS: 

1-aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid synthase

CA: 

carbonic anhydrase

Ci

intercellular CO2 concentration

gS

stomatal conductance

PN

net photosynthetic rate

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The author gratefully acknowledges financial assistance by the University Grants Commission, New Delhi for the work and to the two anonymous reviewers for constructive criticism on the earlier version of the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Botany, Aligarh Muslim University

References

  1. Abeles FB, Morgan PW, Saltveit ME: Ethylene in Plant Biology. 1992, London. UK: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Buhler B, Drumm H, Mohr H: Investigation on the role of ethylene in phytochrome-mediated photomorphogenesis. II. Enzyme levels and chlorophyll synthesis. Planta. 1978, 142: 119-122. 10.1007/BF00385129.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Grewal HS, Kolar JS: Response of Brassica juncea to chlorocholine chloride and ethrel sprays in association with nitrogen application. J Agric Sci. 1990, 114: 87-91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Subrahmanyam D, Rathore VS: Influence of ethylene on carbon-14 labelled carbon dioxide assimilation and partitioning in mustard. Plant Physiol Biochem. 1992, 30: 81-86.Google Scholar
  5. Pua EC, Chi GL: De novo shoot morphogenesis and plant growth of mustard (Brassica juncea) in vitro in relation to ethylene. Physiol Plant. 1993, 88: 467-474. 10.1034/j.1399-3054.1993.880312.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Khan NA, Lone NA, Samiullah : Response of mustard (Brassica juncea L.) to applied nitrogen with or without ethrel sprays under non-irrigated conditions. J Agron Crop Sci. 2000, 184: 63-66. 10.1046/j.1439-037x.2000.00350.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Khan NA, Singh S, Khan M, Samiullah : Interactive effect of nitrogen and plant growth regulators on biomass partitioning and seed yield of mustard. Brassica. 2003, 5: 64-71.Google Scholar
  8. Kays SJ, Pallas JE: Inhibition of photosynthesis by ethylene. Nature. 1980, 385: 51-52. 10.1038/285051a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Rajala A, Peltonen-Sainio P: Plant growth regulator effects on spring cereal root and shoot growth. Agron J. 2001, 93: 936-943.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Grewal HS, Kolar JS, Cheema SS, Singh G: Studies on the use of growth regulators in relation to nitrogen for enhancing sink capacity and yield of gobhi-serson (Brassica napus). Indian J Plant Physiol. 1993, 36: 1-4.Google Scholar
  11. Woodrow L, Grodzinski B: An evaluation of the effects of ethylene on carbon assimilation in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. J Exp Bot. 1989, 40: 361-368.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Khan NA: Activity of 1-aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid synthase in two mustard (Brassica juncea L.) cultivars differing in photosynthetic capacity. Photosynthetica. 2004, 42: 477-480. 10.1023/B:PHOT.0000046170.43688.8d.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Pell EJ, Eckardt NA, Enyedi AJ: Timing of ozone stress and resulting status of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase and associated net photosynthesis. New Phytol. 1992, 120: 397-405.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Eichelmann H, Laisk A: Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase content, assimilatory change and mesophyll conductance in leaves. Plant Physiol. 1999, 119: 179-189. 10.1104/pp.119.1.179.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Badger RR, Price GD: The role of carbonic anhydrase in photosynthesis. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1994, 45: 369-393. 10.1146/annurev.pp.45.060194.002101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Moroney JV, Bartlett SG, Samuelsson G: Carbonic anhydrase in plants and algae. Plant Cell Environ. 2001, 24: 141-153.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Khan NA, Javid S, Samiullah : Physiological role of carbonic anhydrase in CO2 fixation and carbon partitioning. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2004, 10: 153-166.Google Scholar
  18. Taylor GE, Gunderson CA: The response of foliar gas exchange to exogenously applied ethylene. Plant Physiol. 1986, 82: 653-657.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Mattoo AK, White WB: Regulation of ethylene biosynthesis. In: The Plant Hormone Ethylene. Edited by: Mattoo AK, Suttle JC. 1991, CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, 21-42.Google Scholar
  20. Dhawan KR, Bassi PK, Spencer MS: Effects of carbon dioxide on ethylene production and action in intact sunflower plants. Plant Physiol. 1981, 68: 831-834.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kao CH, Yang SF: Light inhibition of the conversion of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid to ethylene in leaves is mediated through carbon dioxide. Planta. 1982, 155: 261-266. 10.1007/BF00392725.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Grodzinski B, Boesel L, Horton RF: Ethylene release from leaves of Xanthium strumarium L. and Zea mays L. J Exp Bot. 1982, 33: 344-354.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Cooke AR, Randall DI: 2-Haloethanephosphonic acids as ethylene releasing agents for the induction of flowering in pineapples. Nature. 1968, 218: 974-975.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Edgerton LJ, Blanpied GD: Regulation of growth and fruit maturation with 2-chloroethanephosphonic acid. Nature. 1968, 219: 1064-1065.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Dwivedi RS, Randhava NS: Evaluation of a rapid test for the hidden hunger in plants. Plant Soil. 1974, 40: 445-451. 10.1007/BF00011531.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Avni A, Bailey BA, Mattoo AK, Anderson JD: Induction of ethylene biosynthesis in Nicotiana tabacum by a Trichoderma viride xylanase is correlated to the accumulation of 1-aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid (ACC) synthase and ACC oxidase transcripts. Plant Physiol. 1994, 106: 1049-1055. 10.1104/pp.106.3.1049.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Woeste KE, Ye C, Kieber JJ: Two Arabidopsis mutants that overproduce ethylene are affected in the post-transcriptional regulation of 1-aminocyclopropane 1-carboxylic acid synthase. Plant Physiol. 1999, 119: 521-529. 10.1104/pp.119.2.521.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Gomez KA, Gomez AA: Statistical Methods for Agricultural Research. 1984, New York: A Wiley-Interscience PublicationGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Khan; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement