Research article
Open Access

Characterization of phosphorus-regulated miR399 and miR827 and their isomirs in barley under phosphorus-sufficient and phosphorus-deficient conditions

  • Michael Hackenberg1,
  • Bu-Jun Shi2Email author,
  • Perry Gustafson3 and
  • Peter Langridge2
BMC Plant Biology201313:214

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-13-214

©  Hackenberg et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

Received: 23 August 2013

Accepted: 16 November 2013

Published: 13 December 2013

Abstract

Background

miR399 and miR827 are both involved in conserved phosphorus (P) deficiency signalling pathways. miR399 targets the PHO2 gene encoding E2 enzyme that negatively regulates phosphate uptake and root-to-shoot allocation, while miR827 targets SPX-domain-containing genes that negatively regulate other P-responsive genes. However, the response of miR399 and miR827 to P conditions in barley has not been investigated.

Results

In this study, we investigated the expression profiles of miR399 and miR827 in barley (Hordeum vulagre L.) under P-deficient and P-sufficient conditions. We identified 10 members of the miR399 family and one miR827 gene in barley, all of which were significantly up-regulated under deficient P. In addition, we found many isomirs of the miR399 family and miR827, most of which were also significantly up-regulated under deficient P. Several isomirs of miR399 members were found to be able to cleave their predicted targets in vivo. Surprisingly, a few small RNAs (sRNAs) derived from the single-stranded loops of the hairpin structures of MIR399b and MIR399e-1 were also found to be able to cleave their predicted targets in vivo. Many antisense sRNAs of miR399 and a few for miR827 were also detected, but they did not seem to be regulated by P. Intriguingly, the lowest expressed member, hvu-miR399k, had four-fold more antisense sRNAs than sense sRNAs, and furthermore under P sufficiency, the antisense sRNAs are more frequent than the sense sRNAs. We identified a potential regulatory network among miR399, its target HvPHO2 and target mimics HvIPS1 and HvIPS2 in barley under P-deficient and P-sufficient conditions.

Conclusions

Our data provide an important insight into the mechanistic regulation and function of miR399, miR827 and their isomirs in barley under different P conditions.

Keywords

Barley Phosphorus miR399 miR827 Isomir Antisense Targets Differential expression

Background

Phosphorus (P) is a major component of fundamental macromolecules in organisms and plays multiple roles in plants, especially in energy transfer, metabolic pathways and regulation of enzymatic reactions. However, P is the second most limiting element for plant growth after nitrogen. Typically, its availability in soil is too low to meet the requirements of plant growth. Therefore, many efforts have been made in the past to improve the ability of plants to acquire P from soils. These efforts have included the utilization of P transporters and, recently, microRNAs (miRNAs) [1–10]. miRNAs are a novel class of non-coding small RNAs (sRNAs) of approximately 22 nucleotides (nt) in length. They are generated from stem loop-forming miRNA precursors (pre-miRNAs), which are processed from long primary miRNAs (pri-miRNAs), transcribed from genomic DNA. In cytoplasm, only one strand (guide strand) of miRNA is loaded into the miRNA induced silencing complex (miRISC) and guides the Argonaut protein (AGO) in miRISC to recognise and cleave mRNA targets or to inhibit protein translation of the targets [11]. Another strand (passenger strand) of the miRNA is degraded via the degradation pathway. Despite their small size, miRNAs play an important role in the regulation of gene expression in various organisms. Compared with other classes of RNAs including mRNAs, miRNAs are more conserved across species.

With the advent of deep sequencing technology, multiple miRNA variants have been identified in various species, tissues and physiological conditions [12, 13]. These miRNA variants are termed isomirs [14], and result either from imprecise or alternative cleavage by the RNaseIII enzymes Dicer (in plants) or Drosha (in animals) during miRNA biogenesis, or from post-transcriptional editing. Isomirs can be classified into three major types: length variations, nt variations along the miRNA and non-templated additions (NTAs) such as adenylation and uridylation at the 3′ end [15]. All three types of isomirs have been suggested to have a biological role [12, 13]. However, it is not clear if the generation of isomirs is a process that is regulated according to environmental conditions. The capacity and specificity of isomirs to regulate their targets relative to their canonical miRNAs are also not well understood.

miR399 is the first miRNA demonstrated to have an ability to increase plant uptake of P in plants [8, 16–20]. Its target has been identified as UBC24, which encodes a ubiquitin-conjugating E2 enzyme, also known as PHOSPHATE 2 (PHO2) [9]. In transgenic plants, increasing miR399 transcripts reduces UBC24 transcripts [21]. It has been shown that the 5′-untranslated region (UTR) of UBC24/PHO2 contains multiple sequences complementary to miR399 [22]. Removal of these sequences stabilises the level of UBC24/PHO2 transcripts under P deficiency [16], indicating that these sequences are likely to be targeted by miR399. The miR399 relationship with UBC24/PHO2 in response to P starvation has been proposed to be conserved in angiosperms [20, 23, 24].

However, the miR399 activity in targeting PHO2 is quenched by IPS1 (Induced by Phosphate Starvation 1), a long non-coding RNA containing a sequence motif complementary to miR399 [25]. IPS1 functions as a target mimic by using its motif to sequester miR399 from PHO2, thereby protecting PHO2 from miR399-mediated cleavage. Because IPS1 lacks a miRNA-mediated cleavage site, the interaction between IPS1 and miR399 is stable. Interestingly, the expression of IPS1 is suppressed by PHO2 per se, revealing autoregulation of miR399 and PHO2.

Another P-upregulated miRNA under P deficiency is miR827 [26–30]. miR827 targets SPX-MSF genes, dependent on P conditions. Under low P conditions it targets SPX-MSF1 while under optimal P conditions it targets SPX-MSF2[28]. The SPX-MFS genes have been predicted to be implicated in phosphate (Pi) sensing or transport [28]. In Arabidopsis, miR827 is also shown to target the Nitrogen Limitation Adaptation (NLA) gene, thereby playing a pivotal role in regulating Pi homeostasis in a nitrate-dependent fashion [29].

Currently, little information is available on the relationship of miR827 or miR399 expression with P conditions in cereal crops. In this study, by analysing expression profiles of miR399 and miR827, we identified 9 novel members of the miR399 family, and many isomirs and antisense sRNAs for both miR399 and miR827. Importantly, we identified several functional isomirs of the miR399 family. Additionally, several small RNAs (sRNAs) derived from the single-stranded loops of the hairpin structures of two MIR399 genes were also shown to be functional by the detection of cleavage products of their predicted targets. Furthermore, we also identified a potential regulatory network among miR399, its target HvPHO2 and target mimics HvIPS1 and HvIPS2 in barley under P-deficient and P-sufficient conditions. Our data provide an important insight into the mechanistic regulation and function of miR399 and miR827 in barley under different P conditions.

Results

Presence of miR399 and miR827 genes in the barley genome

To date, 159 miR399 genes (155 unique sequences) and 16 miR827 genes (16 unique sequences) have been identified from various species and deposited in miRBase (Release 19: August 2012). All the 159 mature miR399 members (39 unique sequences) and 16 mature miR827 members (9 unique sequences) originate from 3p arms. The deposited 5p arm sequences in miRBase are only 19 (18 unique sequences) for miR399 genes and 2 (2 unique sequences) for miR827 genes. There is a dichotomy between the numbers of mature miRNAs and unique sequences in the database. This can be explained by the very high level of conservation between miRNAs of different species. Although many miR399 and miR827 members/genes have been identified in various plant species, currently only one miR399 sequence, but no miR827 sequence, from barley is deposited in miRBase. Given this scenario, we took advantage of our previously obtained sRNA datasets from shoots of P-deficient and P-sufficient barley [30] to identify additional miR399 and miR827 genes in the barley genome. We first aligned all the sRNA sequencing reads to miRBase without mismatch, identifying seven miR399-like sRNA sequences with a total of 644 reads in P-deficient barley and five miR399-like sequences with a total of 62 reads in P-sufficient barley (Additional file 1: Table S1). All of the five miR399-like sequences from P-sufficient barley were detected and up-regulated in the P-deficient barley dataset. When up to 2 nt mismatches were allowed, 10 additional miR399-like sequences were identified in P-deficient barley (red sequences in Additional file 1: Table S1), but no additional miR399-like sequences were found in P-sufficient barley. One of the miR399-like sequences was aligned with miR399d in antisense (Additional file 1: Table S1). Compared to miR399, only two miR827-like sequences, corresponding to osa-miR827a and ghr-miR827a, respectively, were perfectly matched in miRBase from the barley sRNA datasets (Additional file 1: Table S1). However, the homolog of ghr-miR827a does not map to the barley genome (Additional file 1: Table S1). When one nt mismatch was allowed, 50 and 26 miR827-like sequences were further identified in P-deficient and P-sufficient barley, respectively (Additional file 1: Table S1). Of these, 24 were only detected in P-deficient barley while two were specific to P-sufficient barley (Additional file 1: Table S1). Twenty of the miR827-like sequences common to both datasets were up-regulated in P-deficient barley, while three were down-regulated (Additional file 1: Table S1).

The detection of miRNA genes by simply mapping the sRNA sequencing reads to miRBase may generate several errors: (i) some miRNA ‘genes’ might not have a stem-loop structure or low mean free energy, because their pre-miRNA sequences have not been assessed, and hence they may not be true miRNA sequences; (ii) some of the mapped reads might be isomiRs (sequence variants of the canonical mature miRNA [13] and hence not distinct miRNAs); and (iii) some reads may have been erroneously generated from sequencing errors. In line with these points, we found that nine miR399-like sequences and all of the miR827-like sequences (except for the homolog of osa-miR827a) do not perfectly map to the barley genome (Additional file 1: Table S1). We thus consider these sequences to be false positive detections. Some of these sequences may be isomirs, as some nt variations occur at the 5′ ends or internal sequences, which are unlikely to be generated by sequencing errors.

In order to improve the detection of miR399 and miR827 genes, we used a prediction based on the miRanalyzer algorithm [31], together with the newly available barley genome assemblies [32]. In total, we found ten miR399 genes and one miR827 gene. The ten miR399 genes are hvu-miR399-1, hvu-miR399-2, hvu-miR399-3 and hvu-miR399-4, miR399b, miR399c, miR399d, miR399e-1, miR399e-2 and miR399k (Additional file 2: Table S2). The first four miR399 genes give rise to the same mature miRNAs and hence they are given the same name, but with a unique suffix of an identifier number. Of the identified miR399 genes, only one (hvu-miR3993p) is currently annotated in miRBase, but the corresponding 5p arm is not annotated in miRBase. The other nine miR399 genes are novel (Additional file 2: Table S2). miR399-2 and miR399-3 not only have the same miR399-3p sequence but also have the same miR399-5p sequence, which was covered by five reads in our experimental data from P-deficient barley. The 5p sequence of miR399-4 was not detected in our datasets, but the theoretical sequence only differs in one position from the miR399-2-5p sequence. It is very likely that the hvu-miR399-3p sequence in miRBase is derived from hvu-miR399-2, as some reads mapped uniquely to this sequence and not to the other three miR399 genes. Furthermore, the annotated miR399 gene in miRBase does not show a canonical biogenesis, allowing us to rule out that the mature guide strand was obtained from this gene. This does not necessarily mean that the miRBase MIR399 gene is a false positive, but only that in barley shoots it seems not to be processed accordingly to a miRNA. For miR399e, which includes two genes, miR399e-1 and miR399e-2, we found both genes give rise to the same miR399e-3p sequence but have different miR399e-5p sequences. The remaining miR399 genes have both 3p and 5p arm sequences detected from the sRNA datasets. All of the pre-miR399s form stem-loop structures, with mature miRNAs located in the stems (Additional file 3: Figure S1).

Alignment of miR399 3p sequences (red sequences in Figure 1) revealed high homology. Only three nt vary among the ten miR399-3p sequences. By contrast, the miR399 5p sequences (green sequences in Figure 1) only share three conserved nt. If the 5p sequence of hvu-miR399-1 is excluded, the conserved number of nt increases to seven. The overall sequence identity among the ten miR399 genes is about 35%. The lowest sequence identity is between hvu-MIR399-1 and hvu-MIR399c (39%), while the highest identity is between hvu-MIR399d from barley cv. Barke and hvu-MIR399d from cultivars Morex or Bowman (98%). By contrast, miR399 gene sequences in miRBase are less conserved, because they originate from different plant species (Additional file 4: Table S3).
Figure 1

Sequence alignments of barley pre-miR399 genes. Sequences highlighted in red are hvu-miR399-3p sequences, while those highlighted in green are hvu-miR399-5p sequences. Conserved nucleotides are indicated by “*”. For hvu-miR399d, suffixes Morex, Barke and Bowman indicate the genomic sequences of the barley cultivars from which pre-miR399 sequences were derived.

By detecting novel miR399 genes at a genomic level, we could resolve that the perfect match of the read ‘TGCCAAAGGAGAATTGCCC’ to the miRBase sequence of tae-miR399 (see Additional file 1: Table S1) is a false positive, as this read mapped in the barley genome to the same location as miR399b, showing that it is a 3′ truncated isomiR of miR399b and not a novel miR399 gene homologous to tae-miR399. Examples such as this enforce the need for a genome sequence to reliably detect novel miRNAs. While many false positives detected using the miRBase mapping approach have low read counts, setting a stricter threshold on the read counts could result in bona-fide miRNAs being missed. For example, in our barley datasets, while miR399k gave low read counts, both arms were perfectly covered by sequencing reads.

Only one miR827 gene was found in the barley genome, whose 3p and 5p arms were both represented by reads (Additional file 2: Table S2). Surprisingly, from this gene other 3p and 5p arm sequences of miR827 were also detected by reads (Additional file 2: Table S2).

Genomic location of barley miR399 and miR827 genes

Currently, three barley genome assemblies from varieties Morex, Bowman and Barke are available [33]. All the miR399 gene sequences, except for miR399-4, could be found in each of the three barley genome assemblies. miR399-4 is only found in the Morex and Bowman genome assemblies, but not in the Barke assembly (Additional file 2: Table S2). Similarly, the miR827 gene is only found in the Morex and Barke genome assemblies, but not in the Bowman assembly (Additional file 2: Table S2). The chromosomal locations of all miR399 and miR827 genes were determined from the barley assemblies (Additional file 2: Table S2), and were confirmed by Southern blot hybridization with barley-wheat addition lines (data not shown). The miR399 genes are distributed in the long arms of chromosomes 1H, 2H, 3H and 7H, of which 7HL contains five miR399 genes, while the others each contain two miR399 genes (Additional file 2: Table S2). The hvu-MIR399b and hvu-MIR399e-1 genes formed a cluster, as did hvu-MIR399-3 and hvu-MIR399-4 (Additional file 2: Table S2). The distance between the two genes in each cluster is around 2000 nt (Additional file 2: Table S2). The orientation of hvu-MIR399-3 is the same as that of hvu-MIR399-4, while the orientation of MIR399b is the same as that of hvu-MIR399e-1 (Additional file 2: Table S2). Consistently, miR399 members in the rice genome were also found to form clusters [34].

Further location analysis showed that hvu-MIR399b is localized within an intron, while hvu-MIR399e-1 is localized within an exon of a protein-encoding gene confirmed by RT-PCR. hvu-MIR399c, hvu-MIR399d and hvu-MIR399k were also localized within introns. Intriguingly, hvu-MIR399-1, hvu-MIR399-2, hvu-MIR399-3, hvu-MIR399-4, hvu-MIR399e-1 and hvu-MIR399k each have one or two homologous sequences either in a cluster form or in different locations. It is unclear whether these loci are functional. hvu-MIR827 locates to chromosome 2HL (Additional file 2: Table S2), within an intronic region of a gene.

Expression profile of miR399 and miR827 genes under different phosphorus conditions

To compare the obtained read counts (number of times a given RNA molecule was sequenced) between the sequence datasets obtained from P-sufficient and P-deficient barley, we used the RPM (Reads Per Million) expression value, calculating the number of reads mapped to a given element out of each 1,000,000 input reads. This measure is independent of the total number of input reads and can be used for an unbiased comparison between different samples. We found that MIR827 was more highly expressed than any of the MIR399 genes (Additional file 5: Table S4). In P-deficient shoots, we detected 9559 (RPM = 3341) sequence reads corresponding to the guide strand (3p) while under P-sufficiency only 1203 (RPM = 592) reads were detected (Additional file 5: Table S4). This difference corresponds to a fold-change of nearly 6. The RPM expression value shows that under P deficiency, miR827-3p made up nearly 0.33% of all mapped input reads.

Among MIR399 genes, miR399k-3p was the lowest expressed (RPM = 1.4). The other MIR399 genes varied within a very small range from 50.7 (miR399d-3p) to 93.3 (miR399e-1-3p). Although the expression values of the guide strand were similar among the different MIR399 genes, the fold-changes between P-deficient and P-sufficient samples varied significantly. For example, miR399e-3p was expressed over 90-fold more highly under P deficiency, whereas the increase in miR399c-3p expression under P deficiency was only 2.3-fold. The most strikingly P-regulated MIR399 gene was miR399d, for which we could not find a single read in the P-sufficient dataset. By contrast, we identified 145 reads belonging to the guide strand of this miRNA in the P-deficient dataset. It is not known how miR399d is regulated under P conditions, but there is likely to be a P-controlled switch for expression of this miRNA under certain P conditions.

As expected, we generally observed high ratios between the read counts of the guide strand and the passenger strand for most MIR827 and MIR399 genes (see ‘Arm ratio 3p/5p’ in Additional file 5: Table S4). For example, for MIR827 we found nearly 41 times more reads from the 3p strand while for MIR399-1 and MIR399d we found the ratio to be around 29 (Additional file 5: Table S4). Those high ratios strongly suggest that the passenger strand is degraded while the guide strand is functional. However, there were three notable exceptions in the data in Additional file 5: Table S4: [1] although at an overall low read count, the read count of the passenger strand (5p) of MIR399k was five times higher than that of the guide strand (3p) (20 reads vs. 4 reads); [2] there were almost the same number of reads for each of the 3p and 5p arms of MIR399b (150 reads from the 5p arm vs. 177 reads from the 3p arm); and [3] for MIR399c the reads from the guide strand were only slightly higher (1.9 times) than those from the passenger strand. Additionally, a modified read from miR399c-5p was observed, which might have a functional miRNA/mRNA interaction.

Intriguingly, for both MIR399c and MIR399b, for which we observed low 3p/5p arm ratios, we found that the 5p passenger strand is differentially expressed more strongly than the guide strand (Additional file 5: Table S4) due to P conditions. The 5p arm of MIR399b shows a 106.7-fold increase in expression under P deficiency, while the guide strand (3p) is only up-regulated by 9.7 folds (Additional file 5: Table S4). Similarly but less pronouncedly, for miR399c-5p we observed a 4.7-fold increase in expression in the P-deficient barley, while for miR399c-3p there was only a 2.4-fold increase (Additional file 5: Table S4). This stronger differential expression of the passenger strand might suggest the presence of an alternative biogenesis pathway in which the passenger strand is incorporated (more frequently) into the miRISC complex. The detected target cleavage product for miR399c-5p could support this possibility.

To better estimate the expression levels of miR399 and miR827 under different P conditions, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed. We firstly used a forward primer specific to mature hvu-miR399 or hvu-miR827 sequences, and a universal reverse primer. The expression level of hvu-miR399 was 1.5-fold higher under P-deficient conditions than under P-sufficient conditions (Figure 2A), which was consistent with the read abundance of this miRNA in the P-deficient and P-sufficient barley sequencing datasets. This suggests that sRNA sequencing data can be used for assessing the expression levels of sRNAs. Similar to miR399, the expression level of miR827 was also 2.5-fold higher in P-deficient barley than in P-sufficient barley (Figure 2B), suggesting that both miR399 and miR827 may function in P homeostasis in barley. The expression level of miR827 was 50-fold higher than that of miR399 under P-deficient conditions (Figure 2A and B). Because the initial primers used for qRT-PCR could not distinguish between different members of the miR399 family, we designed specific forward and reverse primers according to the pre-miR399 sequences (Additional file 6: Table S5). qRT-PCR analysis showed that four pre-miR399 genes were expressed at much higher levels in P-deficient barley than in P-sufficient barley (Figure 3), which is consistent with previous studies [12]. However, pre-miR399k was expressed at a lower level in P-deficient barley than in P-sufficient barley (Figure 3E). All the other pre-miR399s were expressed at very low levels in both P-deficient and P-sufficient barley, below the detection limits of qRT-PCR (data not shown). These results, combined with the read abundance of mature miR399s, reveal the existence of different expression between the mature miRNAs and the pre-miRNAs in the cells. The expression profile of pre-miR827 was found to be similar to its mature miRNA, which was about 2.5-fold higher in P-deficient barley than in P-sufficient barley (data not shown). Taken together, these results indicate that the expression of miR399 members and miR827 are clearly affected by P conditions in barley. However, how they are affected by P and whether the resultant differential expression is involved in different functions in barley remain unclear.
Figure 2

qRT-PCR analysis of the expression of mature miR399 and miR827 in P-deficient (−P) and P-sufficient (+P) barley shoots. Mature miRNA sequences were used as forward primers while an oligo(dT) sequence was used as a universal reverse primer for both miR399 (A) and miR827 (B). Please note that the expression level of miR827 is much higher than that of miR399.

Figure 3

qRT-PCR analysis of the expression of pre-miR399 and pre-miR827 genes in P-deficient (−P) and P-sufficient (+P) barley shoots. Specific forward and reverse primers were designed from the 5′ terminal sequences and 3′ terminal sequences, respectively, of pre-miR399 and pre-miR827 members. A: Pre-miR399e-1; B: Pre-miR399b; C: Pre-miR399c; D: Pre-miR399d; E: Pre-miR399k.

Profile of miR399 and miR827 isomirs and alternative biogenesis pathways

Different putatively functional sRNAs can be generated from the same pre-miRNA sequence [35]. A typical example is isomirs, which have been shown to be functional in plant species [36]. Recently, isomirs became the focus of miRNA research and most miRNA variants might have the capability to change the target gene repertoire of the canonical sequence. Analysis of isomirs of miR399 and miR827 showed that both adenylated and uridylated reads were present for all guide strand mature sequences under P deficiency (Additional file 7: Table S6). Under P-sufficient conditions, we only found uridylated or adenylated reads for MIR827, but not for MIR399-1. Interestingly, we found that the strongest modified mature sequence under P deficiency is hvu-miR399c-5p, which has nearly 10% of uridylated reads (Additional file 7: Table S6). Furthermore, MIR399c is the least differentially expressed miRNA, perhaps due to the destabilizing potential of uridylation [37]. miR399c-3p, miR399-3p and miR399k-3p did not show adenylation and uridylation at their 3′ ends (Additional file 7: Table S6).

A previous study showed that the most frequent length variants of miRNAs are 1 nt shorter or longer than the canonical version at their 3′ and 5′ ends [38]. However, we found that the most frequent length variant in MIR399-1 is one truncated by 3 nt at the 5′ end, which almost makes up 10% of the total variants, for example, those in miR399c-3p (Additional file 7: Table S6). These variants have potentially different targets compared to the canonical sequence.

Apart from the generation of isomirs, we also analysed if there might be any other differences in the biogenesis of miRNAs under P sufficiency and P deficiency. We observed that MIR399-1 generates a number of sRNAs under P deficiency which are absent under P sufficiency (Additional file 3: Figure S2). The alignment pattern shown in Additional file 3: Figure S2 indicates that at least four different and unique sRNAs are generated from the MIR399-1 pre-cursor sequence. However, we didn’t find targets for these sRNAs in our degradome library, so currently we cannot confirm that the generation of these fragments has function.

Another interesting observation is that MIR827 generates two, overlapping bona fide miRNAs (Additional file 2: Table S2 and Additional file 3: Figure S3). Apart from the canonical sequence, we found a second pair of mature/mature* miRNA sequences that show a perfect 2 nt 3′ overhang as expected from a canonical DCL processing. In plants, it was previously observed that a single pre-miRNA sequence can give rise to several different sRNA molecules. However, as far as we know this is the first time that two different, but overlapping mature miRNAs have been detected. This suggests that within barley shoots, the MIR827 precursor is processed in two different ways: i) to generate the canonical form which shows dramatic differences between P deficiency and P sufficiency in its frequency; and ii) the alternative form that overlaps with the canonical and which does not show differential frequency between P deficiency (RPM: 2.8) and P sufficiency (RPM: 3.1). Only the canonical biogenesis pathway appeared to be regulated by P.

Surprisingly, we found a few sequence reads from the loops of the hairpin structures of MIR399b and MIR399e-1, although the read length of these was short, ranging from 16 nt to 19 nt only (Additional file 3: Figure S4). Loop-derived sRNAs have been found previously in Drosophila[39–41] and have been shown to be functional [42, 43], suggesting that the reads derived from the single-stranded loops of MIR399e-1 and MIR399b in barley may not be randomly generated and may be stable and active in cells. This would in turn suggest that they contribute to target specificity, as their sequences are different from the canonical miRNAs from the same pre-miRNAs.

Targets of miR399 and miR827 and their isomirs in barley

Targets of miR399 and miR827 were first predicted using psRNAtarget. A total of 46 targets for the miR399 members and 12 targets for miR827 were predicted (Additional file 8: Table S7). Some targets have functional annotations, while others do not. A number of targets contain multiple target sites, and are targeted by either the same miRNA or different miRNAs. For example, the gene encoding DNA primase (AV835204) has two predicted sites specifically targeted by hvu-miR399g, while HvPHO2 has five predicted target sites, targeted by different miR399 members (Additional file 8: Table S7).

Predicted targets of miR399 and miR827 were validated using a barley degradome library constructed by RLM-5′-RACE (RNA ligase-mediated rapid amplification of 5′ cDNA ends) technology. The advantage of using a degradome library is that the cleavage sites of miR399 or miR827 targets can be identified without requiring a priori miRNA target prediction. In total, 160 targets of miR399 and 22 targets of miR827 were detected in the library (Additional file 9: Table S8), some of which corresponded to target identities that were predicted bioinformatically, while others had not been predicted. The detected targets of miR399 and miR827 indicate that both miRNAs have diverse and complicated function. It is to note that the targets listed in Additional file 9: Table S8 also include those of putative miR399 and miR827 genes that were not identified in our barley sRNA datasets but were annotated in miRBase.

Consistent with previous studies, many cleavage sites occurred at positions 10–11 relative to the 5′ end of the miRNA (Additional file 9: Table S8). However, cleavage sites occurring at other positions within the targeted site were also observed (Additional file 9: Table S8). Intriguingly, although HvPHO2 targeted by miR399 contains five predicted miR399-interacting sites in the 5′ untranslated region [44], only two of these (interacting sites 2 and 5) were found to be cleaved, and occurred at positions 10–11 relative to the 5′ end of the miRNA (Figure 4). By contrast, in Arabidopsis four of the five miR399-interacting sites [2–5] in the PHO2 gene were reported to be cleaved [21, 45]. Why the other three miR399-interacting sites could not be cleaved by miR399 in barley is unknown, but likely linked to the expression level of the miR399 member(s) that specifically cleave the site, and this may be tissue- or condition-dependent. With the exception of miR399d, all miR399 members cleaved both interacting sites 2 and 5 (miR399d cleaved interacting site 2 only). Furthermore, all miR399 members cleaved the HvPHO2 target at an equal efficiency as judged by the fragment frequency.
Figure 4

Alignment of miR399 members to two predicted cleavage sites [2],[5]on HvPHO2 . Mismatched nucleotides (nt) are indicated in red, while a missing nt is represented by “-“.

To further confirm the targets of miR399 and miR827, some of the targets detected in the degradome library for miR399 and miR827 were selected for qRT-PCR to determine their expression levels. It is expected that a given miRNA and its target would show an inverse relationship in expression level. Indeed, qRT-PCR analysis showed that when the levels of miR399 or miR827 increased under P deficiency, the levels of most of the selected target transcripts decreased (Figure 5). However, one target (Accession No. TC275184) of miR827, which encodes cytochrome P450-like TBP (TATA box binding protein) and plays important endogenous and exogenous roles in the oxidative metabolism [46], did not reduce its expression level in P-deficient barley where the level of miR827 increased (Figure 5). On the other hand, its cleavage product was detected in the degradome library and many P450-derived sRNAs were detected in the sRNA datasets. Therefore, it is inferred that other unknown factor(s) may be involved in the expression of miR827, which is irrelevant to the regulation of the target. It is worth mentioning here that this target is named as MLOC_73301.3 and annotated as Aquaporin 1 in the MIPS Barley database [47]. In order not to be tangled, all the genes described below would be given both Accession No and gene name from the MIPS Barley database. If the genes are not found in the MIPS Barley database, then they would be given only Accession No.
Figure 5

qRT-PCR analysis of the expression of predicted targets of miR399 and miR827 in P-deficient (−P) and P-sufficient (+P) barley shoots. Primer pairs flank cleavage sites of the predicted targets defined by the bioinformatics prediction and degradome library. NP398309 (MLOC_67378.2), AV835204, AL508349 (AK358746), BY839718 and TC275184 (MLOC_73301.3) are accession numbers or gene names from the MIPS Barley database (in bracket) of the predicted targets of miR399 or miR827, encoding NBS-LRR-like protein, DNA primase, proline rich protein, an unknown protein and cytochrome P450-like protein, respectively.

Targets of isomirs of miR399 and miR827 were also directly examined using the barley degradome library. We found several targets for isomirs derived from MIR399-4, MIR399c, MIR399b and MIR399d genes but not for those derived from other miR399 genes or from miR827 (Additional file 10: Table S9). These functional isomirs include mono-adenylated reads from miR399c-5p (Additional file 10: Table S9). In addition, we found that one target (AV835204) was cleaved by isomirs derived from three miR399 genes at two different positions (Additional file 10: Table S9). Furthermore, this target can also be cleaved by their canonical miRNAs.

As described above, several sequence reads were identified from the loops of the hairpin structures of MIR399b and MIR399e-1 (Additional file 3: Figure S4), and were implied to be functional. Accordingly, in the barley degradome library we found that these reads cleaved their predicted targets (Additional file 11: Table S10).

Antisense sequences of miR399 and miR827 in P-deficient and P-sufficient barley

The detection of both arm sequences of pre-miR399 and pre-miR827 in P-deficient and P-sufficient barley prompted us to investigate antisense sequences of miR399 and miR827. Surprisingly, every MIR399 or MIR827 was found to have an antisense sequence (Additional file 12: Table S11). The antisense sequences of hvu-MIR399d in P-deficient barley were even more abundant than their sense sequences (Additional file 12: Table S11). In P-sufficient barley, with the exception of hvu-MIR399c and hvu-MIR827, all of the miR399 antisense sequences were more abundant than their sense sequences (Additional file 12: Table S11). However, there were no significant differences in antisense read abundance for any of the hvu-MIR399 genes or the hvu-MIR827 gene, between P-deficient and P-sufficient barley (Additional file: 12: Table S11). By contrast and as described above, significant differences were observed for sense read abundance for all of the hvu-MIR399 genes and for the hvu-MIR827 gene between P-deficient and P-sufficient barley (Additional file 12: Table S11). The sense reads of hvu-MIR399d and hvu-MIR399k were not present in the P-sufficient barley dataset (Additional file 12: Table S11), suggesting that these two miRNAs are tightly regulated by P. Intriguingly, while MIR399k has no sense read in P-sufficient barley, its antisense reads are the second most abundant in this dataset (Additional file 12: Table S11). Perhaps the expression of sense RNA of MIR399k is sequestered by its antisense RNA under P sufficient conditions.

The antisense sequences of miR827 were not abundant in either the P-deficient or P-sufficient barley datasets (Additional file 12: Table S11). However, the ratio of sense to antisense miR827 was significantly different between P-deficient and P-sufficient barley. In P-deficient barley, this ratio was 179, while in P-sufficient barley it was only 13, which is a more than 13-fold difference between P-deficient and P-sufficient barley. Whether the high level of expression of miR827 in P-deficient barley results from a lower number of antisense sequences under P deficiency relative to P sufficiency is an interesting question to speculate upon. Some of the antisense reads identified for miR399 and miR827 may function as mimics to protect the targets of these miRNAs from cleavage. This could explain why some of the predicted targets of miR399 and miR827 were not identified in the barley degradome library (Additional file 9: Table S8). One miR399 mimic target has previously been identified in barley [44].

Determination of miR399 cleaving HvPHO2

The target gene HvPHO2 of miR399 contains five predicted miR399 target sites. By examining the degradome library, we confirmed that interacting sites 2 and 5 in HvPHO2 were cleaved by miR399. However, it was not known which of the ten miR399 members cleaved these sites. To determine this, we firstly aligned all miR399 sequences with interacting sites 2 and 5 in HvPHO2. We found that hvu-miR399-3p (including hvu-miR399-1-3p, hvu-miR399-2-3p, hvu-miR399-3-3p and hvu-miR399-4-3p) has a single nt deletion relative to target site 2, and two mismatches to target site 5 (Figure 4). By contrast, all the other miR399 members have a single nt deletion and one mismatch to target site 2, and 1–3 mismatches to target site 5 (Figure 4). hvu-miR399k contained a mismatch at position 11 relative to the 5′ end of the miRNA, to both target sites 2 and 5 (Figure 4). Next, we examined the abundance of the miR399 members in the sRNA datasets. As described, all of miR399s had similar read abundance under P deficiency except for hvu-miR399k, which was much less abundant (Figure 4). Taking these results together, we inferred that target site 2 would most likely be cleaved by hvu-miR399-3p (hvu-miR399-1-3p, hvu-miR399-2-3p, hvu-miR399-3-3p and hvu-miR399-4-3p inclusive), followed by hvu-miR399b-3p and hvu-miR399e-3p (miR399e-1-3p and hvu-miR399e-2-3p inclusive), while target site 5 would most likely be cleaved by hvu-miR399b-3p and hvu-miR399e-3p (miR399e-1-3p and hvu-miR399e-2-3p inclusive). hvu-miR399k may not be able to cleave the target due to its low expression level and the mismatch at position 11, which is a pre-requisite for this position to be cleaved. The role of this miRNA in barley is unclear.

Base-pairing of the other three target sites in HvPHO2 with the miR399 genes was also analysed. None of the miR399 genes had less than 3 mismatches to target sites 3 and 4, thereby making these two sites the most diverse (Additional file 3: Figure S5). Furthermore, a mismatch at target site 4 occurs within the miRNA seed sequence important for recognising the target sequence, presumably making it difficult for this target site to be cleaved by miR399. In Arabidopsis, no mismatch occurs within the miRNA seed sequence to any of the five predicted target sites, and hence most of the target sites are cleaved [45]. Unexpectedly, although target site 1 in HvPHO2 was perfectly matched to the abundant hvu-miR399-3p (hvu-miR399-1-3p, hvu-miR399-2-3p, hvu-miR399-3-3p and hvu-miR399-4-3p inclusive) (Additional file 3: Figure S5), its cleavage product by these or other miR399 genes was not found in the degradome library, suggesting that additional factor(s) may control the selection of miRNA cleavage sites.

Correlation of miR399, its PHO2 target and IPS target mimics in P-deficient barley

Previous studies showed that P deficiency-induced IPS genes are target mimics of miR399 and can protect the targets of miR399, such as PHO2, from miR399-mediated cleavage [25]. We also showed that under P deficiency in barley (cv. Pallas) roots, where HvIPS1 and HvIPS2 were expressed at high levels [44], increased miR399 did not reduce the transcript level of HvPHO2, a PHO2 ortholog in barley [44]. To see whether this is the same case in barley shoots, we examined the expression levels of these three genes (HvPHO2, HvIPS1 and HvIPS2) under the same P conditions as for barley roots [44]. qRT-PCR showed that HvPHO2 was expressed at higher levels under P-sufficient conditions than under P-deficient conditions (Figure 6), consistent with observations in Arabidopsis[8, 9, 16], but not in rice [48] or in barley roots [44]. By contrast, HvIPS1 was expressed at higher levels under P-deficient conditions than under P-sufficient condition (Figure 6). However, HvIPS2 expression did not differ between the two P conditions (Figure 6).
Figure 6

qRT-PCR analysis of the expression of HvPHO2, HvIPS1 and HvIPS2 in P-deficient (−P) and P-sufficient (+P) shoots of barley (cv. Pallas). The primers and conditions for the qRT-PCR were as previously described (Huang et al., 2011). A: qRT-PCR of HvPHO2; B: qRT-PCR of HvIPS1; C: qRT-PCR of HvIPS2. * means p < 0.003 versus the expression of the same gene under sufficient P.

To further explore the correlation among hvu-miR399, HvIPS1, HvIPS2 and HvPHO2, we aligned all the reads from the P-deficient and P-sufficient barley datasets with HvIPS1, HvIPS2 and HvPHO2 transcript sequences in both sense and antisense directions. We found no reads derived from HvIPS1 or HvPHO2 transcripts, but several reads derived from HvIPS2, in P-sufficient barley (Additional file 3: Figure S5). However, none of these reads were located in the miR399-interacting portion of the transcript sequence (Additional file 3: Figure S5). By contrast, HvIPS1, HvIPS2 and HvPHO2 transcript-derived reads were identified in the P-deficient barley dataset, although the read number for each transcript was limited (Additional file 3: Figure S5). In contrast to the reads derived from HvIPS1 or HvIPS2 transcripts, which were located outside the miR399-interacting sequence, the reads derived from HvPHO2 were mostly located at miR399 target sites (Additional file 3: Figure S5). We also found a number of reads derived from the antisense strands of HvIPS1 and HvIPS2 transcripts, all of which were only found in the P-deficient barley dataset (Additional file 3: Figure S5). In addition, these reads were all located outside the miR399-interacting portions of the sequences (Additional file 3: Figure S5). Reads derived from the antisense strand of the HvPHO2 transcript were also detected, more abundantly in P-deficient barley than in P-sufficient barley (Additional file 3: Figure S5). All of these reads were located at the target sites of miR399 (Additional file 3: Figure S5). These findings are important because they imply a miRNA regulation network that is more complex than expected. However, more work is required to gain an understanding of how these genes and sequences are coordinated, and regulated by plant P status.

Discussion

We identified ten miR399 genes in barley. In rice nine miR399 loci exist [22, 49], while in dicot Arabidopsis and soybean, six and five miR399 loci are present, respectively [22, 50]. All of these miR399 genes are up-regulated under deficient P, but generally expressed at low levels in these plants. Numerous previous studies have shown that gene expression is controlled by upstream elements such as the promoter [51–54]. However, when we analysed upstream sequences of miR399 genes in plants, we could not find high sequence similarity for these upstream sequences. This suggests that the control of the expression of miR399 genes is independent. In support of this hypothesis, we found that different miR399 genes in barley are differentially expressed under the same conditions. This in turn suggests that other factors are involved, which may control the activity of upstream elements of miR399 genes. Such factors may either be common or unique to each miR399 gene, but associated with plant species, tissue specificity, developmental stage and/or environmental conditions.

In addition to the identified miR399 and miR827 genes, we also identified many isomirs of miR399 and miR827 in barley. Based on previous studies, these isomirs may not be attributable to sequencing errors or alignment artefacts [55–57], but are likely generated from the imprecise cleavage of Dicer or from post-transcriptional editing. Corresponding to this hypothesis, we found that the ends of most of the identified isomirs of miR399 and miR827 fit the type cleavage product from Dicer. However, some isomirs of miR399 or miR827 may be generated from different pathways, because their lengths vary significantly relative to their canonical miRNAs [58]. The specific origin of isomirs of miR399 or miR827 remains unclear. Intriguingly, we found NTAs at the 3′ ends of some isomirs of miR399 and miR827, and that these additions do not favour specific nt. A similar situation has been observed in animals, in which any nt can be added at the 3′ end of a miRNA [58–60]. However, uridylation (U) and adenylation (A) are relatively dominant NTAs. In animal miRNA isomirs, a U at the 3′ ends was proposed to help, while an A at the 3′ ends was anticipated to hinder, association with the miRISC [37]. However, we found that miR399 isomirs with an A addition also cleave their predicted targets in vivo. This suggests that the A addition differs little from the U addition in the ability to incorporate into the miRISC and permit function. In contrast to the 3′ terminal variations, the 5′ terminal variations are predicted to have more impact on the determination of targets [41, 59]. This is because in mature miRNAs, the 5′ terminal sequences are used for guiding AGO protein to cleave the targets.

Recent studies have shown that miRNAs can be generated from loop strands and function [42, 43]. In line with this new discovery, we identified several sRNAs derived from the loops of the hairpin structures of MIR399b and MIR399e-1 (Additional file 3: Figure S4) that were able to cleave their predicted targets (Additional file 12: Table S11). However, how these functioning loop-derived sRNAs were generated is unknown. It is likely that an alternative miRNA processing pathway may apply, which produces miRNA-like sRNAs independent of the Dicer process. This has been the case for mirtrons [61–63], snoRNA-derived miRNAs [64] and tRNA-derived miRNAs [65]. Another possibility is that pre-miRNAs could directly be loaded into the miRISC and processed into mature miRNAs or functional sRNAs by an unknown exonuclease. Nevertheless, the emerging number of studies in this area suggests that loop-derived sRNAs or miRNAs may be conserved across different species. Future studies are needed to unravel the mechanisms of biogenesis and function of loop-derived sRNAs or miRNAs.

It is commonly understood that only one strand (guide strand) from the miRNA duplex is incorporated into the miRISC and functional. The other strand (passenger strand or miRNA*) is degraded. However, we found that both guide and passenger strands of miR827 were abundant, especially in the P-deficient barley dataset. This raises the possibility that the abundant passenger strand of miR827 may also be incorporated into the miRISC and hence stabilized. If this is true, then it is expected that the passenger strand of miR827 can function as a guide strand. Indeed, we detected cleavage products of the passenger strand of miR827 in the barley degradome library. Our result fits recent data from animal systems, showing that passenger strands are incorporated into the miRISC and functional [40, 66–68]. The passenger strand of miR827 may also be able to inhibit target translation. This is because we found no cleavage product in the degradome library for a predicted target (gb|GAKM01126847.1|) which contains a site perfectly reverse complementary to the passenger strand of miR827 at the 3′ untranslational region. Of course, we cannot exclude the possibility that the predicted target may not be a bona fide target. Further experiments are required to reveal a protein level of the target.

One of the predicted targets of miR827, which encodes cytochrome P450-like protein (TC275184/MLOC_73301.3), was observed to have an increasing transcription level in P-deficient barley where the level of miR827 also increased (Figure 5). Several possibilities may explain the parallel increases in miRNA and target expression levels. Firstly, cytochrome P450-like TBP may not be a bona fide target of miR827. However, this does not explain why its cleavage product was detected in the barley degradome library. Secondly, the transcription of cytochrome P450-like TBP may be regulated by both miR827 and P status, but that P status is the dominant regulator, thereby resulting in a high expression level of this RNA in P-deficient barley. Thirdly, the cytochrome P450-like TBP may, like HvPHO2, be protected by an unknown mimic sequence which interacts with miR827, inhibiting effective activity of the miRNA. The detection of the target cleavage product may result from incomplete protection by the mimic sequence. Finally, the mode of action of miR827 may be through inhibition of translation of the cytochrome P450-like TBP rather than cleavage of the mRNA. This has been reported for other miRNAs. Translation inhibition may occur via prevention of the ribosome from reading the cap or proteolysis after translation of the polypeptide chain [69]. The regulation of miR827 and its target genes may be complex. Similarly, in rice miR827 is co-expressed with its targets, OsSPX-MFS1 and OsSPX-MFS2, in the same cells in response to P deficiency, where OsSPX-MFS1 is down-regulated and OsSPX-MFS2 is up-regulated in the plants [28].

In Arabidopsis, miR399 targets PHO2, which negatively regulates Pi uptake and root-to-shoot allocation [9]. In barley we found that with increasing levels of miR399, the transcript levels of HvPHO2 decreased under P deficiency, suggesting that miR399 suppresses the expression of HvPHO2. This is consistent with some, but not all, studies of the relationship between miR399 and PHO2[9]. However, it is not clear why the highly expressed miR399 target mimic, HvISP1, in the same cells could not protect HvPHO2 from miR399-mediated cleavage. In Arabidopsis, over-expression of IPS1 has been shown to increase accumulation of mRNA of the miR399 target PHO2[25]. Other factors, such as HvPHO2-associated sRNAs in barley may be involved in the degradation of HvPHO2. In support of this suggestion, we found that some sRNA species derived from HvPHO2 were only present in the P-deficient barley dataset, but not in the P-sufficient dataset (Additional file 3: Figure S5). Furthermore, these sRNAs were all localised to or near the target sites of HvPHO2 (Additional file 3: Figure S5). We also found that a lot of antisense sRNAs (siRNAs) to HvPHO2 were only present in the P-deficient barley dataset (Additional file 3: Figure S5). The presence of HvPHO2-associated sRNAs in P-deficient barley could substitute for miR399 in mediating the cleavage of HvPHO2. This can explain why the expression level of HvPHO2 was reduced in the presence of high levels of HvIPS1 transcript. Because HvPHO2 contains five predicted target sites, these sRNAs may be triggered by miR399 [45, 70, 71]. However, it cannot be ruled out that part of the sRNA population may be derived from other genes that contain the same sequence as the target sites. Several such genes have been found in the barley EST databases (data not shown).

Previous studies showed that cleavage events triggered by miR399 occurred at target sites 2–5 in PHO2[21, 45]. In one study, the cleavage sites were predominantly at target sites 2 and 3 [21]. In another study, target sites 3, 4, and 5 were predominant [45]. However, our investigation of a barley degradome library only revealed cleavage sites at target sites 2 and 5, and occurring at positions 10–11 relative to the 5′ end of the miRNA. The cause of discrepancy between previous studies was proposed to be due to relative abundance differences of different miR399 members in the samples [45]. However, because almost all miR399 genes have the same sequence in the first 10 nt that are the key for miRNA function, it is difficult to judge which miRNA is responsible for cleavage at each target site, especially at positions 10–11 relative to the 5′ end of the miRNA. On the other hand, it is unlikely that two miRNA genes would cleave the same target site with equal efficiency. Therefore, we presume that one cleavage site may only be cleaved by one miRNA at a certain position and a certain time, and that both sequence specificity (including mismatch positions) and abundance are important for site cleavage. Why has it been observed in previous studies [21, 45] that one target site is cleaved at several positions? One possibility is that the target site could be cleaved by different members of the miR399 family at different times, and another possibility is that some cleavage products may result from natural degradation. The third possibility is that the target site may be cleaved by siRNAs rather miRNAs, as discussed above. Why target site 1, which is perfectly matched to the abundant hvu-miR399, hvu-miR399c and hvu-miR399e, is not cleaved by these or any other miR399 members in this and previous studies [21, 45], is not understood. It suggests that cleavage may be a complex process which relies not only on sequence specificity and abundance, but also on the nature of miRNAs and/or other factors such as plant species, tissue specificity, developmental stage and/or environmental conditions.

miR399 and miR827 are not only responsive to low P, but also responsive to low nitrogen (N) in plants [72–74]. Like P, N is also essential in plant growth and development. In Arabidopsis and maize, miR399 and miR827 are down-regulated under low N conditions [73, 74]. However, in soybean, the two miRNAs were not detected [75] although as many as 452 other miRNAs have been detected and many of them are responsive to low N stress in this plant [75]. Under other nutrient stresses such as sulfate starvation and high levels of Fe, Cu, Zn, Al, Cd and Hg in soils, the latter of which inhibit plant growth and cause toxicity to plants [76], miR399 and miR827 were not found to be regulated. It is unclear how miR399 and miR827 are responsive to low N in plants. It is likely that low N affects the expression of transcription factors or co-factors that control the transcription of MIR399 and MIR827 genes, thereby reducing the expression of the mature miRNAs [77]. This might be true because previous studies have identified multiple cis-elements (GNATATNC), which are bound by a MYB transcription factor, PHOSPHATE STARVATION RESPONSE 1 (PHR1), in the upstream sequences of all six miR399 genes in Arabidopsis [8, 78]. On the other hand, the expression of miR399 and miR827 may also be determined by other factors. In support, miR399 as well as many other nutrient-responsive miRNAs were detected in the phloem of nutrient stressed plants [79–82]. Because the phloem plays a key role in long-distance signalling for many developmental and environmental responses [83], this suggests that miRNAs can be remotely regulated by signals rather have to be regulated physically. From this point of view, miRNAs themselves could function as a signal in systemic regulation of nutrient stress response [78]. This in turn suggests that the stress-regulated miRNAs such as miR399 and miR827 may share a common mechanism in both expression and function. However, this hypothesis needs to be validated via experimental studies.

Conclusions

This study characterises two most P-regulated miR399 and miR827 in barley and provides their potential functional mechanisms in the relationship with P and the adaptive responses to P deficiency. The results could be used for miR399- or miR827-based engineering in the future for improvement of crop yields with limited P fertilizer.

Methods

Prediction and expression profiling

Pallas barley was grown in soil supplied with either 22.5 mg (deficient P) or 75 mg (sufficient P) Pi (KH2PO4) kg-1 dry soil. Basal nutrients and calcium carbonate were added into the soil as previously described [84]. Plant growth conditions were the same as those described [84]. Small RNAs were isolated from the plant shoots that were harvested 16 days after seed imbibitions and sequenced using the 36-base Illumina platform as previously described [30]. Prediction of novel MIR399 and MIR827 genes was performed with a modified miRanalyzer algorithm [31]. Briefly, we mapped all reads to the barley genome (Morex assembly) allowing no mismatches. Reads that map to nearly identical positions in the genome were clustered into “read clusters” in the following way: (i) the reads were sorted by read count (read frequency); (ii) the most frequent read was assigned to the first read cluster (the coordinates of the read cluster are given by the coordinates of the most frequent read); (iii) for all other reads, we checked if the read lay within a window defined by ClusterStart – 3 nt and ClusterEnd + 5 nt on the same strand (flankings were added in order to assign all isomiRs to the same read cluster); (iv) if the read belonged to an existing cluster, the associated read information (sequence and the read count) was added to the cluster; and (v) if the read did not belong to an existing cluster, a new cluster was opened. After clustering all reads, we extracted pairs of read clusters with distances of less than 150 nt between each other, because for bona fide miRNAs there should be two read clusters corresponding to the two arms processed from the pre-miRNA sequence. Next, the genomic sequence spanned by the two read clusters was extracted and the secondary structure and alignment pattern of the derived pre-miRNA was analysed. We retained only those candidates for which: (i) the reads mapped to the stem of the pre-miRNA; (ii) the reads showed little fluctuation around the 5′ start position in the alignment; and (iii) the read representing the 3p arm mapped to a known miRBase miR399 or miR827 sequence, allowing no more than 2 mismatches.

The obtained mature miRNA sequences (the guide strand which is 3p for both miR399 and miR827) were then mapped again with no mismatches to the genome, in order to obtain all genes giving rise to the same mature miRNA. For all mappings the putative pre-miRNA sequence was extracted. We accepted the candidate if a hairpin structure with MFE < = −35 kcal/mol existed and the 3p reads were located on the stem of the hairpin structure, which was predicted using Mfold [85].

To profile the expression values of a given mature miRNA, we first mapped all reads to the barley genome for obtaining the corresponding genomic coordinates for each read, then by means of the coordinates of the mature miR399 and miR827 sequences, we extracted all reads that lay within a window of: start position of the canonical mature miRNA – 3 nt and end position of the canonical mature miRNA + 5 nt. We allowed a window of [−3;+5] around the canonical miRNA in order to detect all isomiRs and to assign them correctly to each miRNA.

Target genes of miR399 and miR827

Target genes of miR399 and miR827 were first predicted using psRNATarget [86], a plant sRNA target analysis server [87], and were then validated using a barley (cv. Pallas) degradome library constructed using RLM-5'-RACE technology according to Addo-Quaye et al. [88]. Briefly, poly(A) RNA was extracted from total RNA of barley plants using the Oligotex kit (Qiagen) and then ligated with a 5′ RNA adaptor containing a MmeI restriction site using T4 RNA ligase (Invitrogen), followed by reverse transcription, second-strand synthesis, MmeI digestion, ligation of a 3′ dsDNA adaptor, gel-purification, and PCR amplification. Amplified PCR products were sequenced with the Illumina HiSeq platform.

Southern blot hybridization

Southern blot hybridization was carried out according to Shi et al. [89]. Briefly, barley genomic DNA was digested with appropriate restriction enzymes and separated via gel electrophoresis. The DNA was then transferred to a membrane and hybridized with radiolabelled probes. After hybridization, the membrane was washed once at 65°C for 30–45 min in 2xSSC (0.3 M NaCl and 0.03 M sodium citrate) containing 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), and twice at 65°C for 30–45 min in 1xSSC containing 0.1% SDS. The membrane was subjected to autoradiography at −80°C as required until sufficient probe signal became visible.

RT-PCR and qRT-PCR

RT-PCR was performed as described [90], and qRT-PCR was conducted using the NCode™ VILO™ miRNA cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen). Specifically, following isolation of total RNA, all miRNAs and pre-miRNAs in the sample were polyadenlyated and reverse-transcribed using poly A polymerase, ATP, SuperScript™ III RT, and a specially designed universal RT primer in a single reaction. The synthesized first-strand cDNA was then amplified with a forward primer specific to the miRNA of interest and a universal reverse primer provided in the kit. The amplification was performed in an RG 6000 Rotor-Gene real-time thermal cycler (Corbett Research) using the following conditions: 3 minutes at 95°C followed by 45 cycles of 1 s at 95°C, 1 s at 55°C, 30 s at 72°C (fluorescence reading acquired), and 15 s at 81°C. The transcript levels of genes encoding glyceraldehyde 3-Pi dehydrogenase, heat shock protein 70, cyclophilin, and α-tubulin were used as controls [91]. Normalization was carried out using multiple control genes as described by Burton et al. [91].

Availability of supporting data

All the supporting data are included as additional files.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Chunyuan Huang for providing plant materials and Ursula Langridge, Hui Zhou, Yuan Li, Margaret Pallotta and Bryce Shi for providing technical assistance. The authors also thank Dr. Julie Hayes for her careful reading of the manuscript. This work was funded by the Australian Research Council, the Grains Research and Development Corporation and the South Australian Government.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Computational Genomics and Bioinformatics Group, Genetics Department, University of Granada
(2)
Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics, The University of Adelaide
(3)
USDA-ARS, University of Missouri

References

  1. Mitsukawa N, Okumura S, Shirano Y, Sato S, Kato T, Harashima S, Shibata D: Overexpression of an Arabidopsis thaliana high-affinity phosphate transporter gene in tobacco cultured cells enhances cell growth under phosphate-limited conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997, 94: 7098-7102. 10.1073/pnas.94.13.7098.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Liu C, Muchhal US, Mukatira U, Kononowicz AK, Raghothama KG: Tomato phosphate transporter genes are differentially regulated in plant tissues by phosphorus. Plant Physiol. 1998, 116: 91-99. 10.1104/pp.116.1.91.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Shin H, Shin HS, Dewbre GR, Harrison MJ: Phosphate transport in Arabidopsis: Pht1;1 and Pht1;4 play a major role in phosphate acquisition from both low- and high-phosphate environments. Plant J. 2004, 39: 629-642. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02161.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Ai P, Sun S, Zhao J, Fan X, Xin W, Guo Q, Yu L, Shen Q, Wu P, Miller AJ, et al: Two rice phosphate transporters, OsPht1;2 and OsPht1;6, have different functions and kinetic properties in uptake and translocation. Plant J. 2009, 57: 798-809. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03726.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Rae AL, Cybinski DH, Jarmey JM, Smith FW: Characterization of two phosphate transporters from barley; evidence for diverse function and kinetic properties among members of the Pht1 family. Plant Mol Biol. 2003, 53: 27-36.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Rae L, Jarmey JM, Mudge SR, Smith FW: Over-expression of a high-affinity phosphate transporter in transgenic barley plants does not enhance phosphate uptake rates. Funct Plant Biol. 2004, 31: 141-148. 10.1071/FP03159.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Ramaekers L, Remans R, Rao IM, Blair MW, Vanderleyden J: Strategies for improving phosphorus acquisition efficiency of crop plants. Field Crops Res. 2010, 117: 169-176. 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.03.001. references thereinView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Bari R, Datt Pant B, Stitt M, Scheible WR: PHO2, microRNA399, and PHR1 define a phosphate-signaling pathway in plants. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141: 988-999. 10.1104/pp.106.079707.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Kuo HF, Chiou TJ: The role of microRNAs in phosphorus deficiency signalling. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156: 1016-1024. 10.1104/pp.111.175265.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Sunkar R, Li YF, Jagadeeswaran G: Functions of microRNAs in plant stress responses. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17: 196-203. 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.01.010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Vaucheret H, Vazquez F, Crete P, Bartel DP: The action of ARGONAUTE1 in the miRNA pathway and its regulation by the miRNA pathway are crucial for plant development. Genes Dev. 2004, 18: 1187-1197. 10.1101/gad.1201404.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee LW, Zhang S, Etheridge A, Ma L, Martin D, et al: Complexity of the microRNA repertoire revealed by next-generation sequencing. RNA. 2010, 16: 2170-2180. 10.1261/rna.2225110.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Neilsen CT, Goodall GJ, Bracken CP: IsomiRs – the overlooked repertoire in the dynamic microRNAome. Trends Genet. 2012, 28: 544-549. 10.1016/j.tig.2012.07.005. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2012.07.005PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Morin RD, O’Connor MD, Griffith M, Kuchenbauer F, Delaney A, Prabhu AL, Zhao Y, McDonald H, et al: Application of massively parallel sequencing to microRNA profiling and discovery in human embryonic stem cells. Genome Res. 2008, 18: 610-621. 10.1101/gr.7179508. doi:10.1101/gr.7179508PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Wyman SK, Knouf EC, Parkin RK, Fritz BR, Lin DW, Dennis LM, Krouse MA, Webster PJ, Tewari M: Post-transcriptional generation of miRNA variants by multiple nucleotidyl transferases contributes to miRNA transcriptome complexity. Genome Res. 2011, 21: 1450-1461. 10.1101/gr.118059.110.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Fujii H, Chiou TJ, Lin SI, Aung K, Zhu JK: A miRNA involved in phosphate-starvation response in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol. 2005, 15: 2038-2043. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.016.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Aung K, Lin SI, Wu CC, Huang YT, Su CL, Chiou TJ: pho2, a phosphate overaccumulator, is caused by a nonsense mutation in a microRNA399 target gene. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141: 1000-1011. 10.1104/pp.106.078063.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Chiou TJ, Aung K, Lin SI, Wu CC, Chiang SF, Su C: Regulation of phosphate homeostasis by microRNA in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2006, 18: 412-421. 10.1105/tpc.105.038943.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Gao N, Su Y, Min J, Shen W, Shi W: Transgenic tomato overexpressing ath-miR399d has enhanced phosphorus accumulation through increased acid phosphatase and proton secretion as well as phosphate transporters. Plant Soil. 2010, 334: 123-136. 10.1007/s11104-009-0219-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Hu B, Zhu C, Li F, Tang J, Wang Y, Lin A, Liu L, Che R, Chu C: LEAF TIP NECROSIS1 plays a pivotal role in regulation of multiple phosphate starvation responses in rice. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156: 1101-1115. 10.1104/pp.110.170209.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Allen E, Xie Z, Gustafson AM, Carrington JC: microRNA-directed phasing during trans-acting siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cell. 2005, 121: 207-221. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.04.004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Sunkar R, Zhu JK: Novel and stress-regulated microRNAs from Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2004, 16: 2001-2019. 10.1105/tpc.104.022830.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Valde’s-Lo’pez O, Arenas-Huertero C, Ramı’rez M, Girard L, Sa’nchez F, Vance CP, Luis Reyes J, Herna’ndez G: Essential role of MYB transcription factor: PvPHR1 and microRNA:PvmiR399 in phosphorusdeficiency signalling in common bean roots. Plant Cell Environ. 2008, 31: 1834-1843. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01883.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu JQ, Allan DL, Vance CP: Systemic signalling and local sensing of phosphate in common bean: cross-talk between photosynthate and microRNA399. Mol Plant. 2010, 3: 428-437. 10.1093/mp/ssq008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Franco-Zorrilla JM, Valli A, Todesco M, et al: Target mimicry provides a new mechanism for regulation of microRNA activity. Nat Genet. 2007, 39: 1033-1037. 10.1038/ng2079.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Pant BD, Buhtz A, Kehr J, Scheible WR: MicroRNA399 is a long-distance signal for the regulation of plant phosphate homeostasis. Plant J. 2008, 53: 731-738. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03363.x.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Hsieh LC, Lin SI, Shih AC-C, Chen JW, Lin WY, Tseng CY, Li WH, Chiou TJ: Uncovering small RNA-mediated responses to phosphate deficiency in Arabidopsis by deep sequencing. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151: 2120-2132. 10.1104/pp.109.147280.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Lin SI, Santi C, Jobet E, Lacut E, El Kholti N, Karlowski WM, Verdeil JL, Breitler JC, Pe’rin C, Ko SS, et al: Complex regulation of two target genes encoding SPX-MFS proteins by rice miR827 in response to phosphate starvation. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51: 2119-2131. 10.1093/pcp/pcq170.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Kant S, Peng M, Rothstein SJ: Genetic regulation by NLA and MicroRNA827 for maintaining nitrate-dependent phosphate homeostasis in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7: e1002021. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002021.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Hackenberg M, Huang PJ, Huang CY, Shi BJ, Gustafson P, Langridge P: A comprehensive expression profile of microRNAs and other classes of non-coding small RNAs in barley under phosphorous-deficient and -sufficient conditions. DNA Res. 2012, 19: 1-17. 10.1093/dnares/dsr037.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Hackenberg M, Rodriguez-Ezpeleta N, Aransay AM: miRanalyzer: an update on the detection and analysis of microRNAs in high-throughput sequencing experiments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39: W132-W138. 10.1093/nar/gkr247.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. The International Barley Genome Sequencing Consortium: A physical, genetic and functional sequence assembly of the barley genome. Nature. 2012, 491: 711-717.Google Scholar
  33. IPK Barley Blast Server. http://webblast.ipk-gatersleben.de/barley/viroblast.php.
  34. Cui X, Xu SM, Mu DS, Yang ZM: Genomic analysis of rice microRNA promoters and clusters. Gene. 2009, 431: 61-66. 10.1016/j.gene.2008.11.016.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang W, Gao S, Zhou X, Xia J, Chellappan P, Zhou X, Zhang X, Jin H: Multiple distinct small RNAs originated from the same microRNA precursors. Genome Biol. 2010, 11: R81. 10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r81.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Vaucheret H: AGO1 homeostasis involves differential production of 21-nt and 22-nt miR168 species by MIR168a and MIR168b. PLoS One. 2009, 4: e6442. 10.1371/journal.pone.0006442.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Kai ZS, Pasquinelli AE: MicroRNA assassins: factors that regulate the disappearance of miRNAs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010, 17: 5-10. 10.1038/nsmb.1762. doi:10.1038/nsmb.1762PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhou HJ, Arcila ML, Li ZH, Lee EJ, Henzler C, Liu JY, Rana TM, Kosik KS: Deep annotation of mouse iso-miR and iso-moR variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40: 5864-5875. 10.1093/nar/gks247. doi:10.1093/nar/gks247PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Ruby JG, Stark A, Johnston WK, Kellis M, Bartel DP, Lai EC: Evolution, biogenesis, expression, and target predictions of a substantially expanded set of Drosophila microRNAs. Genome Res. 2007, 17: 1850-1864. 10.1101/gr.6597907.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Ghildiyal M, Xu J, Seitz H, Weng Z, Zamore PD: Sorting of Drosophila small silencing RNAs partitions microRNA* strands into the RNA interference pathway. RNA. 2010, 16: 43-56. 10.1261/rna.1972910.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Berezikov E, Robine N, Samsonova A, Westholm JO, Naqvi A, Hung JH, Okamura K, Dai Q, Bortolamiol-Becet D, Martin R, et al: Deep annotation of Drosophila melanogaster microRNAs yields insights into their processing, modification, and emergence. Genome Res. 2011, 21: 203-215. 10.1101/gr.116657.110.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Okamura K, Ladewig E, Zhou L, Lai EC: Functional small RNAs are generated from select miRNA hairpin loops in flies and mammals. Genes Dev. 2013, 27: 778-792. 10.1101/gad.211698.112.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Winter J, Link S, Witzigmann D, Hildenbrand C, Previti C, Diederichs S: Loop-miRs: active microRNAs generated from single-stranded loop regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41: 5503-5512. 10.1093/nar/gkt251.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Huang CY, Shirley N, Genc Y, Shi B, Langridge P: Phosphate utilization efficiency correlates with expression of low-affinity phosphate transporters and noncoding RNA, IPS1, in barley. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156: 1217-1229. 10.1104/pp.111.178459.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Lin SI, Chiang SF, Lin WY, Chen JW, Tseng CY, Wu PC, Chiou TJ: Regulatory network of microRNA399 and PHO2 by systemic signalling. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147: 732-746. 10.1104/pp.108.116269.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Nelson DR, Koymans L, Kamataki T, Stegeman JJ, Feyereisen R, Waxman DJ, Waterman MR, Gotoh O, Coon MJ, Estabrook RW, Gunsalus IC, Nebert DW: P450 Superfamily: update on new sequences, gene mapping, accession numbers and nomenclature. Pharmucogenetics. 1996, 6: 1-42. 10.1097/00008571-199602000-00002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. MIPS PlantsDB. http://mips.helmholtz-muenchen.de/plant/barley/ga/index.jsp.
  48. Zhou J, Jiao FC, Wu ZC, Li YY, Wang XM, He XW, Zhong WQ, Wu P: OsPHR2 is involved in phosphate-starvation signaling and excessive phosphate accumulation in barley of plants. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146: 1673-1686. 10.1104/pp.107.111443.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Ismail AM, Heuer S, Thomson MJ, Wissuwa M: Genetic and genomic approaches to develop rice germplasm for problem soils. Plant Mol Biol. 2007, 65: 547-570. 10.1007/s11103-007-9215-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Xu F, Liu Q, Chen L, Kuang J, Walk T, Wang J, et al: Genome-wide identification of soybean microRNAs and their targets reveals their organ-specificity and responses to phosphate starvation. BMC Genomics. 2013, 14: 66. 10.1186/1471-2164-14-66. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-66PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Smale ST: Core promoters: active contributors to combinatorial gene regulation. Genes Dev. 2001, 15: 2503-2508. 10.1101/gad.937701.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Thomas MC, Chiang CM: The general transcription machinery and general cofactors. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2006, 41: 105-178. 10.1080/10409230600648736.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Heintzman ND, Ren B: The gateway to transcription: identifying, characterizing and understanding promoters in the eukaryotic genome. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007, 64: 386-400. 10.1007/s00018-006-6295-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Juven-Gershon T, Hsu J-Y, Theisen JW, Kadonaga JT: The RNA polymerase II core promoter - the gateway to transcription. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008, 20: 253-259. 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.03.003.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Kim J, Cho IS, Hong JS, Choi YK, Kim H, Lee YS: Identification and characterization of new microRNAs from pig. Mamm Genome. 2008, 19: 570-580. 10.1007/s00335-008-9111-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Reese TA, Xia J, Johnson LS, Zhou X, Zhang W, Virgin HW: Identification of novel microRNA-like molecules generated from herpesvirus and host tRNA transcripts. J Virol. 2010, 84: 10344-10353. 10.1128/JVI.00707-10.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Burroughs AM, Kawano M, Ando Y, Daub CO, Hayashizaki Y: pre-miRNA profiles obtained through application of locked nucleic acids and deep sequencing reveals complex 5′/3′ arm variation including concomitant cleavage and polyuridylation patterns. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40: 1424-1437. 10.1093/nar/gkr903.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. de Hoon MJ, Taft RJ, Hashimoto T, Kanamori-Katayama M, Kawaji H, Kawano M, Kishima M, Lassmann T, Faulkner GJ, Mattick JS, et al: Cross-mapping and the identification of editing sites in mature microRNAs in high-throughput sequencing libraries. Genome Res. 2010, 20: 257-264. 10.1101/gr.095273.109.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Chiang HR, Schoenfeld LW, Ruby JG, Auyeung VC, Spies N, Baek D, Johnston WK, Russ C, Luo S, Babiarz JE, et al: Mammalian microRNAs: experimental evaluation of novel and previously annotated genes. Genes Dev. 2010, 24: 992-1009. 10.1101/gad.1884710.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Guo L, Yang Q, Lu J, Li H, Ge Q, Gu W, Bai Y, Lu Z: A comprehensive survey of miRNA repertoire and 3’ addition events in the placentas of patients with pre-eclampsia from high-throughput sequencing. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e21072. 10.1371/journal.pone.0021072.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Berezikov E, Chung WJ, Willis J, Cuppen E, Lai EC: Mammalian mirtron genes. Mol Cell. 2007, 28: 328-336. 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.09.028.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Okamura K, Hagen JW, Duan H, Tyler DM, Lai EC: The mirtron pathway generates microRNA-class regulatory RNAs in Drosophila. Cell. 2007, 130: 89-100. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.028.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Ruby JG, Jan CH, Bartel DP: Intronic microRNA precursors that bypass Drosha processing. Nature. 2007, 448: 83-86. 10.1038/nature05983.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Babiarz JE, Ruby JG, Wang Y, Bartel DP, Blelloch R: Mouse ES cells express endogenous shRNAs, siRNAs, and other Microprocessor-independent, Dicer-dependent small RNAs. Genes Dev. 2008, 22: 2773-2785. 10.1101/gad.1705308.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Ender C, Krek A, Friedlander MR, Beitzinger M, Weinmann L, Chen W, Pfeffer S, Rajewsky N, Meister G: A human snoRNA with microRNA-like functions. Mol Cell. 2008, 32: 519-528. 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.10.017.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Czech B, Zhou R, Erlich Y, Brennecke J, Binari R, Villalta C, Gordon A, Perrimon N, Hannon GJ: Hierarchical rules for Argonaute loading in Drosophila. Mol Cell. 2009, 36: 445-456. 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.028.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Jazdzewski K, Liyanarachchi S, Swierniak M, Pachucki J, Ringel MD, Jarzab B, de la Chapelle A: Polymorphic mature microRNAs from passenger strand of pre-miR-146a contribute to thyroid cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009, 106: 1502-1505. 10.1073/pnas.0812591106.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Okamura K, Liu N, Lai EC: Distinct mechanisms for microRNA strand selection by Drosophila Argonautes. Mol Cell. 2009, 36: 431-444. 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.027.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Gu S, Kay MA: How do miRNAs mediate translational repression?. Silence. 2010, 1: 1. 10.1186/1758-907X-1-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Ronemus M, Vaughn MW, Martienssen RA: MicroRNA-targeted and small interfering RNA-mediated mRNA degradation is regulated by argonaute, dicer, and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2006, 18: 1559-1574. 10.1105/tpc.106.042127.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Axtell MJ, Jan C, Rajagopalan R, Bartel DP: A two-hit trigger for siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cell. 2006, 127: 565-577. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.032.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Liang G, He H, Yu D: Identification of nitrogen starvation-responsive microRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e48951. 10.1371/journal.pone.0048951.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Xu Z, Zhong S, Li X, Li W, Rothstein SJ, et al: Genome-wide identification of microRNAs in response to low nitrate availability in maize shoots and roots. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e28009. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028009. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028009PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhao M, Tai H, Sun S, Zhang F, Xu Y, Li WX: Cloning and characterization of maize miRNAs involved in responses to nitrogen deficiency. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e29669. 10.1371/journal.pone.0029669.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Wang Y, Zhang C, Hao Q, Sha A, Zhou R, Zhou X, Yuan L: Elucidation of miRNAs-mediated responses to low nitrogen stress by deep sequencing of two soybean genotypes. PLoS One. 2013, 8: e67423. 10.1371/journal.pone.0067423.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Zeng HQ, Wang GP, Hu XY, Wang HZ, Du LQ, Zhu YY: Role of microRNAs in plant responses to nutrient stress. Plant Soil. 2013, doi:10.1007/s11104-013-1907-6Google Scholar
  77. Chiou TJ: The role of microRNAs in sensing nutrient stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2007, 30: 323-332. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01643.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Chiou TJ, Lin SI: Signaling network in sensing phosphate availability in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 2011, 62: 185-206.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Buhtz A, Springer F, Chappell L, Baulcombe DC, Kehr J: Identification and characterization of small RNAs from the phloem of Brassica napus. Plant J. 2008, 53: 739-749. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03368.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Buhtz A, Pieritz J, Springer F, Kehr J: Phloem small RNAs, nutrient stress responses, and systemic mobility. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10: 64. 10.1186/1471-2229-10-64.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Kehr J: Systemic regulation of mineral homeostasis by microRNAs. Front Plant Sci . 2013, 4: 145.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Pant BD, Musialak-Lange M, Nuc P, May P, Buhtz A, Kehr J, Walther D, Scheible WR: Identification of nutrient-responsive Arabidopsis and rapeseed microRNAs by comprehensive real-time polymerase chain reaction profiling and small RNA sequencing. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150: 1541-1555. 10.1104/pp.109.139139.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Dinant S, Suárez-López P: Multitude of long-distance signal molecules acting via phloem. Biocommunication of Plants. Edited by: Witzany G, Baluska F. New York: Springer; 2012,89-121.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Genc Y, Huang CY, Langridge P: A study of the role of root morphological traits in growth of barley in zinc-deficient soil. J Exp Bot. 2007, 58: 2775-2784. 10.1093/jxb/erm142.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Zuker M: Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 3406-3415. 10.1093/nar/gkg595.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Dai XB, Zhao PX: psRNATarget: a plant small RNA target analysis server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39 (suppl 2): W155-W159. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr319PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. psRNATarget server. http://plantgrn.noble.org/psRNATarget.
  88. Addo-Quaye C, Eshoo TW, Bartel DP, Axtell MJ: Endogenous siRNA and miRNA targets identified by sequencing of the Arabidopsis degradome. Curr Biol. 2008, 18: 758-762. 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.042.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Shi BJ, Sutton T, Collins NC, Pallotta M, Langridge P: Construction of a barley bacterial artificial chromosome library suitable for cloning genes for boron tolerance, sodium exclusion and high grain zinc content. Plant Breed. 2010, 129: 291-296. 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2009.01762.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Schreiber AW, Shi BJ, Huang CY, Langridge P, Baumann U: Discovery of barley miRNAs through deep sequencing of short reads. BMC Genomics. 2011, 12: 129. 10.1186/1471-2164-12-129.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Burton RA, Shirley NJ, King BJ, Harvey AJ, Fincher GB: The CesA gene family of barley (Hordeum vulgare): quantitative analysis of transcripts reveals two groups of co-expressed genes. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134: 224-236. 10.1104/pp.103.032904.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Hackenberg et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement