Open Access

Structure and evolution of Apetala3, a sex-linked gene in Silene latifolia

  • Radim Cegan1, 2,
  • Gabriel AB Marais3,
  • Hana Kubekova1,
  • Nicolas Blavet4,
  • Alex Widmer4,
  • Boris Vyskot1,
  • Jaroslav Doležel5,
  • Jan Šafář5 and
  • Roman Hobza1Email author
BMC Plant Biology201010:180

Received: 4 May 2010

Accepted: 18 August 2010

Published: 18 August 2010



The evolution of sex chromosomes is often accompanied by gene or chromosome rearrangements. Recently, the gene AP3 was characterized in the dioecious plant species Silene latifolia. It was suggested that this gene had been transferred from an autosome to the Y chromosome.


In the present study we provide evidence for the existence of an X linked copy of the AP3 gene. We further show that the Y copy is probably located in a chromosomal region where recombination restriction occurred during the first steps of sex chromosome evolution. A comparison of X and Y copies did not reveal any clear signs of degenerative processes in exon regions. Instead, both X and Y copies show evidence for relaxed selection compared to the autosomal orthologues in S. vulgaris and S. conica. We further found that promoter sequences differ significantly. Comparison of the genic region of AP3 between the X and Y alleles and the corresponding autosomal copies in the gynodioecious species S. vulgaris revealed a massive accumulation of retrotransposons within one intron of the Y copy of AP3. Analysis of the genomic distribution of these repetitive elements does not indicate that these elements played an important role in the size increase characteristic of the Y chromosome. However, in silico expression analysis shows biased expression of individual domains of the identified retroelements in male plants.


We characterized the structure and evolution of AP3, a sex linked gene with copies on the X and Y chromosomes in the dioecious plant S. latifolia. These copies showed complementary expression patterns and relaxed evolution at protein level compared to autosomal orthologues, which suggests subfunctionalization. One intron of the Y-linked allele was invaded by retrotransposons that display sex-specific expression patterns that are similar to the expression pattern of the corresponding allele, which suggests that these transposable elements may have influenced evolution of expression patterns of the Y copy. These data could help researchers decipher the role of transposable elements in degenerative processes during sex chromosome evolution.


Sex chromosomes evolved independently many times in both animals and plants [1]. The initial steps of their evolution, including the genetic degeneration of the non-recombining Y or W chromosomes (which are analogous to Y chromosomes), have received great interest from geneticists. To date, most of our knowledge about sex chromosome evolution stems from a few animal systems with evolutionary old sex chromosomes [2]. However, evolutionarily young sex chromosomes are needed to investigate the early steps in sex chromosome evolution. Such sex chromosomes can be found in plants [3, 4]. Although the majority of plants are cosexuals, forming either bisexual flowers (hermaphrodites) or unisexual flowers of both sexes on one individual (monoecy), dioecious plant species (with separate sexes) have evolved multiple times in different plant lineages [5]. The majority of dioecious plant species lack morphologically distinguishable sex chromosomes. However, well differentiated heteromorphic sex chromosomes were described in Rumex acetosa, Cannabis sativa and Silene latifolia. The latter has become a model species for investigations into the evolution of sex chromosomes in plants.

Silene latifolia Poiret (syn. Melandrium album Garcke, syn. Melandrium pratense Roehl.) is a strictly dioecious, perennial herb of the Caryophyllaceae family. The sex of individual plants is genetically determined by sex chromosomes that were first described independently by Blackburn [6] and Winge [7]. Females are homogametic with a pair of X chromosomes, while the males are heterogametic, XY [8]. The X and Y chromosomes are about 1.4-fold and 2-fold larger than the largest autosome, respectively [9]. Therefore, they contribute substantially to the large genome size of the species and to the slightly larger genome size in males than in females [10]. The Y chromosome in S. latifolia seems to lack some essential genes present on the X, since plants are not viable unless they have at least one X chromosome [11]. By analyzing hermaphroditic mutants and their progeny, Westergaard [12] showed that all independently derived hermaphrodites had deletions in one arm of the Y chromosome. From the studies on deletion mutants, Westergaard [13] concluded that one arm of the Y chromosome contains gene(s) for anther maturation, while the other arm has gene(s) suppressing carpel development, and additional genes located close to the centromere stimulate early stages of stamen development [13]. More recently, molecular markers in combination with a panel of deletion mutants were used to create a detailed map of the Y chromosome [1416].

Gene and genome duplications have been recognized as major forces driving the evolution of animal and plant genomes. Two basic processes can cause duplication of genes. The first process, segmental duplication, keeps the structure of a gene (exon-intron order, cis regulatory sequences) in its original constitution. The duplicated copy of the gene maintains expression patterns similar to the original copy. The second process, retrotransposition, often generates non-functional gene copies that lack regulatory elements and introns [17, 18].

The evolution of sex chromosomes is a complex genetic and epigenetic process [1], which is often accompanied by structural rearrangements and accumulation of repetitive DNA in non-recombining regions. Moreover, intensive gene turnover within sex chromosomes is reflected by a high number of retroposed genes both on X and Y chromosomes [19, 20]. It is known that over the course of S. latifolia sex chromosome evolution, many repetitive elements have accumulated on the Y chromosome [21]. However, we still lack information about which elements are linked to degenerative processes in Y chromosome evolution by either genetic or epigenetic mechanisms [22], and little is known about the structural and functional role of repetitive DNA in Y linked genic regions of this plant.

Here we unravel the structure and evolution of a sex linked gene, SlAP3, first reported as having originated by duplication from autosomes to the Y chromosome in S. latifolia [23]. Since SlAP3Y is located close to the oldest stratum (4.5-7 MY) in the Y chromosome, this gene is a candidate to be affected by various degenerative processes [24, 25]. In our study, we did not find evidence for a duplication event in the case of this gene. Instead, we identified a new pair of sex linked alleles with no evidence for autosomal paralogues. We demonstrated the accumulation of retrotransposon sequences in an intron region of the Y linked allele. We further analyzed expression patterns of individual elements identified in the Y copy of SlAP3 gene to reveal their role in Y chromosome evolution.


Identification of genomic clones for APETALA3 (AP3) gene

S. latifolia and S. vulgaris BAC libraries were screened with SlAP3A and SlAP3Y gene derived probes prepared using the sequences and primers from Matsunaga et al. [23]. Positively hybridizing clones were selected, and the presence of the target gene was verified by PCR including sequencing of PCR products. In total, we identified four clones containing the AP3 gene in the S. latifolia BAC library. Two clones contained the presumed autosomal SlAP3A copy (246/K15, 251/L13) and the other two contained SlAP3Y (30/L22 and 253/J6). Four copies of an orthologue, which we called SvAP3, were identified in the S. vulgaris BAC library. Both BACs containing the SlAP3Y copy were selected for further complete BAC sequencing. For the SlAP3A and SvAP3 BAC clones, we isolated DNA, digested it with HindIII and conducted a Southern blot hybridization. The original probes from the BAC library screening were used for the hybridization. Subsequent experiments revealed no difference in hybridization patterns within BAC groups (SlAP3A, SvAP3) (Additional file 1, Figure S1). Differences in signal intensity of individual hybridizing BACs are due mainly to the different sizes of BAC inserts, which prevented us from using equimolar amounts during gel loading. Based on complete sequence similarity (after sequencing of PCR products with the same primers as used for probe preparation) and an identical hybridization profile, we randomly selected BAC clones 91/M20 (containing SvAP3), 251/L13 (SlAP3A) and 30/L22, 253/J6 (SlAP3Y) for a more detailed analysis. The data obtained strongly suggest that there is just one allelic pair of the SlAP3 gene in both the S. latifolia and S. vulgaris genomes.

Linkage mapping by PCR on microdissected chromosomes

To confirm the linkage of individual SlAP3 alleles to specific chromosomes, we microdissected and separated X chromosomes and autosomes in S. latifolia (Additional file 2, Figure S2) and ran PCR using these chromosomes as templates. We used primers for POL sequence of the Retand retroelement [26] as a positive control. Surprisingly, PCR with primers for the SlAP3A K-domain resulted in a product only with genomic DNA of both sexes and using microdissected X chromosomes as a template (figure 1). We did not obtain any PCR product from microdissected autosomes, an observation which did not confirm the presumed presence of a copy of the SlAP3A gene on an autosome. These observations demonstrate that SlAP3A, originally described as an autosomal copy in Matsunaga et al. [23], is in fact an X linked allele of the SlAP3Y gene, which we call from here on SlAP3X.
Figure 1

PCR on microdissected chromosomes. POL Retand primers were used as a positive control (present in all chromosomes) and primers for SlAP3A/X K-domain were used for sex chromosomes localization. The template DNA is indicated in the figure (size marker (L) 100 bp, male genomic DNA (♂) female genomic DNA (♀) microdissected X chromosomes (X), microdissected autosomes (A) and negative control (no template). PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide.

Genomic organization

BAC clones 251/L13, 30/L22, 253/J6 and 91/M20 were purified and sequenced. We identified a copy of the AP3 gene in all the BACs sequenced [GenBank: HQ113124, HQ113125, HQ113126]. Comparison with mRNA for S. latifolia SlAP3A [GenBank: AB090863] and SlAP3Y [GenBank: AB090864] revealed seven exons for SlAP3Y and SvAP3, while SlAP3X contains only six exons (figure 2).
Figure 2

Alignment of a promoter and coding region of SlAP3X, SlAP3Y and SvAP3 genes. Rectangles represent exon regions of the genes. Corresponding coding sequences are indicated

The size of individual introns differed only slightly among the different copies of AP3 (figure 2). The only exception was a very large intron 2 (23,855 bp) in the SlAP3Y allele. We found that this intron contains two different retroelements that are shuffled into each other. The first retroelement contains a pair of LTRs, reverse transcriptase, RNaseH, integrase and gag gene, while the sequence of the second retroelement is incomplete and composed of LTRs and ORF1 product from Athila ORF-1 family (figure 3).
Figure 3

The structure of SlAP3Y gene. Red rectangles represent coding domains of retrotransposons. Blue rectangles are individual exons of SlAP3Y. Ovals represent long terminal repeats.

Genomic distribution of repetitive DNA in SlAP3Yintron

All coding domains (LINE, reverse transcriptase, integrase) and LTRs were used as probes for FISH on mitotic metaphase chromosomes (Additional file 3, Figure S3). Analysis of the distribution of individual signals did not indicate a specific role of these particular retroelements in Y chromosome evolution (figure S3). FISH analysis was also conducted with the tandemly arrayed repetitive Y promoter motive. There was no signal both after standard and low stringency FISH experiments, indicating a low abundance of this repetitive satellite motif in the S. latifolia genome.

Expression analysis of Y linked retroelements

To reveal activity (expression) of individual repetitive elements linked to SlAP3Y and their domains, we conducted RT-PCR experiments (figure 4). Retroelement A (its LTR part) and LINE were expressed in both males and females in different tissues (leaves and buds). Surprisingly, retroelement B had a different pattern of expression between the LTR part and the rest of its genes. Although integrase and RT domain showed similarly to retroelement A, and LINE widespread expression in both sexes and all tissues, the LTR B region was expressed only in the floral buds of both sexes.
Figure 4

RT-PCR analysis. Actin, LTR A, LTR B, integrase, reverse transcriptase (RT) and LINE primers were used. Genomic DNA with actin primers and BAC DNA with element specific primers were used as a positive control. Actin reveals a different sized PCR product when genomic DNA is used as a template than when cDNA is used as a template due to intron excision, and so can be used as an internal control for purity of RNA used for reverse transcription. Template DNA is indicated in the figure (size marker (M) 100 bp ladder), male genomic DNA (♂), female genomic DNA (♀), BAC DNA (30/L22 and 253/J6) S. latifolia male and female cDNA and RNA from leaves (L) and buds (B) and negative control (-, no template). PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide.

We quantified the expression of individual domains of the retroelements localized in the SlAP3Y copy by identifying the number of hits with the male and female specific EST database of S. latifolia. This database is composed of ca 100,000 reads generated by 454 sequencing (Roche FLX 454 pyrosequencing) using cDNA from male and female buds as a sequencing template. The accuracy of the selected approach was tested by comparing the occurrence of part of the actin gene in both male and female EST databases (Table 1). Internalpart of retroelement B (integrase, reverse transcriptase) revealed a similar number of hits (expression level) in both males and females. LTR A, LTR B and LINE element expression was stronger in males based on the EST database data. LTR B, which has 28× higher expression in males than in females, was the most different.
Table 1

Estimation of intensity of expression of different parts of retroelements in intron 2 based on the number of reads in S. latifolia cDNA libraries (actin was used as an internal control).










RT (Retroelement B



Integrase (Retroelement B)









Promoter structure analysis

By comparing promoter sequence structure, we discovered significant differences in SlAP3Y in comparison with SlAP3X and SvAP3. A part of the SlAP3Y promoter is formed by a 6 bp long direct repeat. Both ends of the repeat are bordered by inverted tandem structures that resemble the organization of a MITE element (Additional file 4, Figure S4). GenBank database searches revealed no similarity of this part of the promoter to any known sequence, except for the MROS1 gene [27] promoter region [GenBank: AB013446.1]. Although MROS1 is not a sex-linked gene, like SlAP3Y it is expressed only in males.

Sequence divergence analysis

In S. latifolia, recombination between the sex chromosomes has ceased in three steps, and three groups of genes with different levels of divergence (also called strata) have been identified [25, 28]. The level of divergence between SlAP3 X and Y copies is about 13% (see Table 2), between the 20% X-Y divergence typical of the stratum 1 genes and the 10% X-Y divergence typical of the stratum 2 genes.
Table 2

dN and dS analysis in X/Y, dioecious and non-dioecious species.

dN/dS analysis

dS X-Y

dN X-Y

dN/dS X

dN/dS Y



S. latifolia

S. latifolia

S. latifolia,

S. latifolia,



S. dioica,

S. dioica,

S. vulgaris,


S. diclinis

S. diclinis

S. conica


0.135 +- 0.035

0.055 +- 0.011




We conducted a dN/dS analysis on the SlAP3 sequence to study the possibility of differences in intensity and form of selection in the X and Y copies of this gene (and also with autosomal orthologs). We included all available orthologous sequences from Silene species to have as many sequences as possible for the phylogenetic dN/dS analysis, which tends to give more accurate results with more sequences, and to have outgroups (the non-dioecious species S. vulgaris and S. conica). The results are reported in table 2 and in additional file 5, figure S5. The dN/dS ratios in X and Y sequences among dioecious Silene species were not found to be significantly different, which does not provide clear evidence of the Y copy degeneration. However, dN/dS ratios were found to be significantly different (p-value = 0.0149) between dioecious and non-dioecious lineages. The higher ratio in the dioecious lineage suggests that selection has been relaxed in both the X and Y sequences compared to the autosomal copy in S. vulgaris and S. conica where dN/dS is much lower (see Table 2).


By screening more than five haploid complements of the S. latifolia genome, we identified two copies each of SlAP3Y and SlAP3A genes. The number of identified BAC clones containing variants of the Y and the presumed autosomal copy suggests that SlAP3 is a single copy gene. According to Matsunaga et al. [23], the Y copy of SlAP3 is a paralog of an autosomal allele that was transferred onto the Y chromosome after the beginning of sex chromosome evolution in Silene. Although the authors mentioned the existence of introns in both paralogs, genomic sequence data were not presented. To decipher the mechanism of the translocation of SlAP3 gene within the S. latifolia genome, we isolated and sequenced BAC clones containing SlAP3 paralogs. Moreover, we isolated and sequenced SlAP3 gene from the S. vulgaris genome (a closely related gynodioecious plant without sex chromosomes) and named this gene SvAP3 (Silene vulgaris APETALA3 gene). Comparison of the orthologs between S. latifolia and S. vulgaris revealed that the Y copy of S. latifolia and the autosomal copy of S. vulgaris have seven introns, whereas the X copy of S. latifolia contains only six introns. Surprisingly, the promoter region of SlAP3Y copy is completely different from both SvAP3 and SlAP3A.

To study the extent of the translocated autosomal region on the Y chromosome we intended to select low copy markers in the Y BAC clone and to map them on dissected sex chromosomes and autosomes by PCR. However, PCR with the SlAP3 specific primers revealed different localization of SlAP3 paralogues in the genome than expected. While we were able to amplify SlAP3 gene copies using X chromosomes as templates, there was no PCR product when only autosomes served as a template. These observations show that SlAP3 is a regular sex-linked gene with X and Y alleles, and that no transfer to the Y chromosome has occurred. Our data suggest different results as shown in Matsunaga et al. [23]. The simplest explanation in this case could be use of different techniques for separation of sex chromosomes. Chromosome sorting used by Matsunaga et al. [23] is a powerful method which generates large amount of DNA for further experiments. The main disadvantage of this method is that it is subject to impurities even when the chromosomes being sorted are significantly morphologically different, as is the case for S. latifolia sex chromosomes and autosomes [29]. Unlike chromosome sorting, laser microdissection is more laborious but produces a pure fraction of selected material [30, 31].

Based on comparisons of the X and Y alleles we showed that SlAP3X and SlAP3Y started to diverge quite early: their divergence at synonymous sites (13%) is close to the maximum X-Y divergence recorded so far for S. latifolia sex linked genes, although the mapping of SlAP3 on the X chromosome is needed to confirm this. No clear evidence of degeneration of the Y copy has been found in this case. Rather, the dN/dS values for dioecious vs. non-dioecious lineages suggest a subfunctionalization in which X and Y copies have differentially retained their ancestral functions (still coded by one gene in the non-dioecious species), as has been hypothesized for some sex-linked genes in humans [32]. Moreover, a branch-site analysis (Additional file 6, Table S1) revealed no significant evidence for positive selection on the Y sequences (or on the X sequences), which further supports subfunctionalization. Furthermore, the expression patterns of the Y copies and the X copies also suggest subfunctionalization [23]. The observed differences in expression patterns between SlAP3X and SlAP3Y are due to regulatory differences of particular alleles in males, where both SlAP3X and SlAP3Y are present. Comparisons of promoter sequences of all three copies of AP3 revealed that the autosomal promoter in S. vulgaris is identical to the SlAP3X promoter. Surprisingly, there is a unique 80 bp promoter region in the SlAP3Y copy. The only regulatory sequence that shows similarity with this Y promoter specific structure is a part of the MROS1 gene promoter in S. latifolia [27]. This gene (localized on autosomes) is also expressed exclusively in males. Although the role of the identified promoter with the same expression pattern of both SlAP3Y and MROS1 should be verified by e.g. transformation of a plant with "promoter-reporter gene " construct, an efficient transformation protocol is not yet available for Silene species. The most prominent evidence suggesting a role of the promoter in sex-specific gene expression regulation is its uniqueness in genome of S. latifolia; it appears only in a genic context and mainly co-occurrs with sex specifically expressed genes. Although it is a tandem repeat, it shows no accumulation in S. latifolia genome. Even a GenBank search of Silene species derived sequences shows no hits with these repetitive DNA fractions.

Our results have implications for intron size evolution in evolving sex chromosomes. We identified a very large intron containing two retrotransposons between the exons 2 and 3 of SlAP3Y. A similar phenomenon showing accumulation of different sequences in the Y linked introns was previously reported for some other S. latifolia genes [33, 34]. Although it is known that different repetitive elements such as microsatellites [35], tandem repeats [36], organellar DNA [37] and different retrotransposons [38, 39] have played a prominent role in the formation of sex chromosomes in S. latifolia, there is no direct link between the structural role of such elements and their impact on degeneration of the Y chromosome. To assess the role of these repetitive elements in the Y chromosome evolution we ran FISH experiments and expression (RT-PCR and in silico) analysis. Although we did not find specific accumulation of the studied elements in the Y chromosome, we observed different expression patterns among different retroelements and in different tissues. RT-PCR data showed that the LTR B domain, unlike other parts of retroelement B, is specifically expressed in the floral buds of both sexes. These data show an increased activation of a specific type of retroelement during early developmental stages. This phenomenon could be linked to meiotic stages of cells in developing buds when the epigenetic status of genetic information is reassembled and the regulatory role of epigenetic mechanisms is suppressed. A higher expression level was found in LTR A, LINE and especially LTR B in male bud tissue based on in silico analysis using EST databases. Although it is known that in males, germ line activity of some retroelements is elevated compared to females [40], we suggest several explanations that concern the evolution of sex chromosomes. It is known from recent papers [33, 34], that Y linked genes contain more repetitive elements in their introns compared to X alleles. Higher expression of such Y linked retroelements could be a consequence of co-expression of the element with Y linked genes. Biased occurrence of both LTRs identified in the SlAP3Y gene in male EST database could also be explained by another aspect of sex chromosomes evolution. Once a retroelement appears in a Y linked gene it follows the same rules for degenerative processes as Y linked genes. Entire retrotransposonal genes could loose their functions by mutation accumulation and the introduction of stop codons. Retrotranscription begins in the LTR region, and thus this part of the retrotransposon is kept in the expressome even after termination of transcription in other parts of the retroelement (gag, pol). It is also known that unpaired DNA caused by retrotransposon insertion into a chromosome is recognized by RNAi machinery and consequently homologous RNA is degraded [41]. Since there is no pairing of chromosomes in non-recombining regions of sex chromosomes, this mechanism is not triggered in this case and expression of retrotransposons is not regulated in males.

Our data further suggest that previously published retroelement types that are accumulated on the Y chromosome [38] are different from those that participate in intron targeting of Y linked genes. Analysis of the Y promoter linked repetitive microsatellite motif within a MITE element reveals a low abundance in S. latifolia genome. Paradoxically, the sequences responsible for the large size of sex chromosomes may thus be different from those that have potentially caused degeneration of Y linked genes.


This study unravels the structure and evolution of AP3, a sex linked gene with copies on the X and Y chromosomes in the dioecious plant S. latifolia. This gene was previously reported to be located on the autosomes, with one copy having been transferred by duplication to the Y chromosome. Our results provide evidence for the location of copies on X and Y chromosomes, and the absence of this gene on autosomes. Divergence between the X and Y-linked copies both at sequence (promoter and coding regions) and gene expression levels suggests subfunctionalization has been an important process in the evolutionary dynamics of this gene. One intron of the Y-linked allele was invaded by retrotransposons that display sex-specific expression patterns, similar to the expression pattern of the corresponding allele, which suggests transposable elements may have contributed to the evolution of gene expression of this gene


Plant material and isolation of metaphase chromosomes

Silene latifolia Garcke and Silene vulgaris plant material was obtained from a seed collection of the Institute of Biophysics, Brno. Sterilized seeds were cultured for 2 days in distilled water and then synchronized with aphidicoline (30 mmol/l for 12 h) and oryzalin (15 μmol/l for 4 h). Root tips from germinating seedlings were cut off and enzymatically protoplasted. The protoplasts were briefly fixed in the mixture of ethanol:acetic acid (3:1) to avoid further DNA damage. The mitotic protoplast suspension was dropped on a membrane (for laser microdissection, stained with Giemsa) or on microscope slides (for FISH experiments), where naked chromosomes were released [31].

BAC library construction and screening

The BAC libraries were constructed from S. latifolia male and S. vulgaris high molecular weight genomic DNA. Briefly, DNA was digested with HindIII enzyme and inserted into a pECBAC1 and pIndigoBAC-5 (Epicentre) vectors, respectively. Clones were then grid in duplicate on Hybond N+ (Amersham, Biosciences) nitrocellulose membrane filters in a 4 X 4 pattern that allowed us to identify well positions and plate numbers of each clone. The filters were incubated and processed as described in Bouzidi et al. [42]. The S. latifolia BAC library (total of 119,808 colonies) was arrayed on six nylon filters with 18,432 colonies each, and one nylon filter containing 9,216 clones. The average insert-size of the library is 128 kb. The S. vulgaris BAC library (total of 55,296 clones) was arrayed on three nylon filters with 18,432 colonies each. The average insert-size of the library was 110 kb. Based on nuclear size data by Vagera et al [10] and Široký et al. [43], we have estimated that coverage of the S. latifolia BAC library is 5.327 complements of the male haploid genome and the S. vulgaris BAC library is 6.8 complements of the haploid genome.

Screnning was performed by radioactive hybridization with α32P and with Prime-It II Random Primer Labelling Kit (Stratagene) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Probes were prepared by PCR amplification of K-box region of SlAP3A and SlAP3Y (see PCR).BAC DNA was isolated by Large Construct Kit (Qiagen). DNA for PCR reactions was isolated using NaOH/SDS precipitation according to Sambrook and Russel [44].

DNA amplification

For K-domain of SlAP3A and SlAP3Y and SvAP3 amplification we used primers according to Matsunaga et al., [23] and for MEF2A domain primers SVMEF2_F (5'-GGAAGAGGAAAGTTAGAGAT-3'), SVMEF2_R (5'-TGCAATTTGTGGGTGCTAGA-3') with male and female genomic DNA and with DNA of positively hybridized BAC clones. For amplification of conservative domains of retrolelements in the intron 2 of SlAP3Y we used the following primers: GAG_IN2_F (5'-CACCCTTGTCGGTTTCAATC-3'), GAG_IN2_R (5'-AGCGGATGCTAAGGAGATCA-3'), RT_IN2_F (5'-CCATCAACTACCCCCATTTG-3'), RT_IN2_R (5'-GTGGATACGGCTAAGGTGGA-3'), Integ_IN2_F (5'-CCTCTTCACCTTGCAACTCC-3'), Integ_IN2_R (5'-TTTGCAACAAGGTGATCTCG-3'), LTRB_IN2_F (5'-CCGAAGTTGGAGACTTTGGA-3'), LTRB_IN2_R (5'-GTTAATCCTCCCGTCCCAAT-3'). Primers for the POL part of the RETAND element were designed according to Kejnovsky et al. [26]. PCR conditions were the same for all primer pairs used. The reaction profile included 35 cycles of 45 s at 94°C, 1 min at 61°C and 2 min at 72°C preceded by initial denaturation (4 min at 94°C) and followed by final extension step (10 min at 72°C). PTC-200 (MJ Research) and T3000 (Biometra, Goettingen, Germany) thermal cyclers were used.


Total RNA was extracted from young flower buds (0.1-0.4 cm), and leaf tissues using RNA blue (Top-Bio). One microgram of total RNA was treated with RNase-free DNase (Ambion) and then used for cDNA synthesis using High Capacity RNA-to-cDNA Kit (Applied Biosystems) according to manufacturer's protocol. The synthesized cDNAs were used as templates for RT-PCR. For amplification of conservative domains of retrolelements we used the following primers: LINE_ap3y_F (5'-AAAGCAGGTGGGAGAAACCT-3'), LINE_ap3y_R (5'-GCAACCTTATTGGCTTCACG-3'), LTRB_ap3y_F (5'-TTACACCAAGCAAGGGAAGG-3'), LTRB_ap3y_R (5'-GCAATTACGTGGAAACGACA-3'), LTRA_ap3y_F (5'-AGATTACCCATCGCAACAGG-3'), LTRA_ap3y_R (5'-GACCGAGTATGGCTGGTGTT-3'), IN_ap3y_F (5'-GCGATAGATGCCAACGTTTT-3'), IN_ap3y_R (5'-TTCAAGCCTCTTGCTCCAAT-3'), RT_ap3y_F (5'-TGAGCATCTTCTCGGATTATGT-3'), RT_ap3y_R (5'-TATGCACCGTGTTAGGACCA-3'). PCR conditions were the same as described in DNA amplification. Actin was used as a positive control with primers ActinS-F (5'-CTGCTTACCGAAGCACCATT-3'), ActinS-R (5'-AGGGCGTAACCCTCGTAAAT-3'). The reaction profile for actin included 35 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 sec at 55°C and 30 sec at 72°C preceded by initial denaturation (4 min at 94°C) and followed by final extension step (10 min at 72°C).

Southern blot hybridization

BAC DNA was restricted by HindIII and than transferred by reverse Southern blotting on Hybond N+ (Amersham, Biosciences) membrane filters. Radioactive hybridization was performed as described in the BAC library screening.


Mitotic slides were prepared according to Lengerova et al. [45]. The CellCut Plus system (Olympus) was applied to isolate sex chromosomes and autosomes. Briefly, protoplasts were dropped on a microdissection membrane. Chromosomes of interest were selected and transferred into Eppendorf tube according to manufacturer's protocol (MMI).

Fluorescence in situhybridization on metaphase chromosomes

Slides were treated as described in Lengerova et al. [45] with slight modifications. Slide denaturation was performed in 7:3 (v/v) formamide: 2 X SSC for 2 min at 72°C. Slides were immediately dehydrated through 50%, 70%, and 100% ethanol (-20°C), and air dried. The probe was denatured at 70°C for 10 min, and 100 ng of the denatured probe was added at room temperature and hybridized for 18 h at 37°C. Slides were analyzed using Olympus Provis microscope, and image analysis was performed using ISIS software (Metasystems). DNA was labeled with Fluorolink Cy3-dUTP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) (red labeling) in combination with the nick translation mix (Roche).

The probe for the SlAP3Y promoter-repeat was synthesized by VBC-Genomics (Vienna) with Cy3 modification on 5'end. The sequence of this probe is: 5'- (ACCCGAN)3 -3'.


BAC DNA was isolated and commercially sequenced from selected BACs using 454 sequencing with Roche GS FLX (GATC Biotech, Konstanz). Basic sequence analysis, sequence assembling and alignment were done with Geneious software. Multiple sequence comparisons were performed with MAFFT [46] and BLAST online applications. A homology search was performed with BLAST [47]. Gene structure identification was done with GENSCAN software [48] and FGENESH [49]

ORFs were found with ORF Finder [50] and a homology search for conserved domains was performed with NCBI Conserved Domain Search [51] All primers were designed by Primer3 Input (v.0.4.0) [52] Other simple sequence analyses were done by The Sequence Manipulation Suite - version 2 (SMS2), [53]

Data analysis

To compute the dN and dS between X and Y copies of SlAP3 in different dioecious species both GenBank sequences and data from BAC sequencing were used. We then ran codeml with the pairwise option on the X and Y sequences [54]. We also performed a phylogenetic analysis of dN/dS using SlAP3 sequences presented in (S. latifolia and S. vulgaris) and from GenBank (S. latifolia, S. dioica, S. diclinis and S. conica from Matsunaga et al. [23]). We aligned the sequences using Seaview version 4 [55]. We used the species tree known for the Silene species in the alignment [56] instead of the tree built from the alignment because of tree building problems with less than 10 sequences (as in [34], see Additional file 5, figure S5). We then ran codeml (branch model and branch-site options) on the alignment and a tree. Statistical significance was tested using likelihood ratio tests [54]. For the expression analysis, we used EST libraries extracted from S. latifolia male and female individuals (Blavet et al., in preparation). These libraries are non-normalized, so we estimated the relative gene expression based on the quantity of reads. To estimate the expression of the retrotransposon located in the large intron of SlAP3Y, we performed a BLAST search with an E-value cut-off 10-40 versus both male and female libraries.



This research was supported by Czech Science Foundation (grant nos. 522/09/0083 and 204/09/H002), Grant Agency of AS CR (grant nos. M200040905 and KJB600040901), the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (grants no. AV0Z50040507 and AV0Z50040702), ETH Zurich (grant no. TH-7 06-3), and by Agence National de la Recherche for support (grant number ANR-08-JCJC-0109). We thank Dr. Julia M. Svoboda for critical reading of the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

Laboratory of Plant Developmental Genetics, Institute of Biophysics Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
Department of Plant Biology, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno
Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive (UMR 5558), CNRS University Lyon 1
Institute of Integrative Biology, Plant Ecological Genetics, ETH Zurich
Laboratory of Molecular Cytogenetics and Cytometry, Institute of Experimental Botany


  1. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B, Marais G: Steps in the evolution of heteromorphic sex chromosomes. Heredity. 2005, 95: 118-28. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800697.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Marshall Graves JA: Weird animal genomes and the evolution of vertebrate sex and sex chromosomes. Annu Rev Genet. 2008, 42: 565-86. 10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091714.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ming R, Moore PH: Genomics of sex chromosomes. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007, 10: 123-30. 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.01.013.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Negrutiu I, Vyskot B, Barbacar N, Georgiev S, Monéger F: Dioecious plants. A key to the early events of sex chromosome evolution. Plant Physiology. 2001, 127: 1418-1424. 10.1104/pp.010711.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Ainsworth C: Boys and girls come out to play: The molecular biology dioecious plants. Ann Bot-London. 2000, 86: 211-221. 10.1006/anbo.2000.1201.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackburn KB: Sex chromosomes in plants. Nature. 1923, 112: 687-688. 10.1038/112687c0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Winge O: On sex chromosomes, sex determination and preponderance of females in some dioecious plants. CR Trav Lab Carlsberg. 1923, 15: 1-26.Google Scholar
  8. Vyskot B, Hobza R: Gender in plants: sex chromosomes are emerging from the fog. Trends Genet. 2004, 20: 432-438. 10.1016/j.tig.2004.06.006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Matsunaga S, Hizume M, Kawano S, Kuroiwa T: Cytological analysis in Melandrium album: genome size, chromosome size and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cytologia. 1994, 59: 135-149.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Vagera J, Paulíková D, Doležel J: The development of male and female regenerants by in vitro androgenesis in dioecious plant Melandrium album. Ann Bot. 1994, 73: 455-459. 10.1006/anbo.1994.1056.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Veuskens J, Ye D, Oliveira M, Ciupercescu DD, Installe P, Verhoven HA, Negrutiu I: Sex determination in the dioecious Melandrium album - androgenetic embryogenesis requires the presence of the X-chromosome. Genome. 1992, 35: 8-16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Westergaard M: Aberrant Y chromosomes and sex expression in Melandrium album. Hereditas. 1946, 32: 419-443. 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1946.tb02784.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Westergaard M: The mechanism of sex determination in dioecious flowering plants. Adv Genet. 1958, 9: 217-281. full_text.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Farbos I, Veuskens J, Vyskot B, Oliveira M, Hinnisdaels S, Aghmir A, Mouras A, Negrutiu I: Dimorphism in white campion: Deletion on the Y chromosome results in afloral asexual phenotype. Genetics. 1999, 151: 1187-1196.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Lebel-Hardenack S, Hauser E, Law TF, Schmid J, Grant SR: Mapping of sex determination loci on the white campion (Silene latifolia) Y chromosome using amplified fragment length polymorphism. Genetics. 2002, 160: 717-25.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Bergero R, Charlesworth D, Filatov DA, Moore RC: Defining regions and rearrangements of the Silene latifolia Y chromosome. Genetics. 2008, 178: 2045-53. 10.1534/genetics.107.084566.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Babushok DV, Ostertag EM, Kazazian HH: Current topics in genome evolution: molecular mechanisms of new gene formation. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007, 64: 542-54. 10.1007/s00018-006-6453-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaessmann H, Vinckenbosch N, Long M: RNA-based gene duplication: mechanistic and evolutionary insights. Nat Rev Genet. 2009, 10: 19-31. 10.1038/nrg2487.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Lahn BT, Pearson NM, Jegalian K: The human Y chromosome, in the light of evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 2001, 2: 207-216. 10.1038/35056058.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Emerson JJ, Kaessmann H, Betrán E, Long M: Extensive gene traffic on the mammalian X chromosome. Science. 2004, 303: 537-40. 10.1126/science.1090042.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kejnovsky E, Hobza R, Kubat Z, Cermak T, Vyskot B: The role of repetitive DNA in structure and evolution of sex chromosomes in plants. Heredity. 2009, 102: 533-541. 10.1038/hdy.2009.17.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Bachtrog D: Expression profile of a degenerating neo-Y chromosome in Drosophila. Curr Biology. 2006, 16: 1694-1699. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.053.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Matsunaga S, Isono E, Kejnovsky E, Vyskot B, Kawano S, Charlesworth D: Duplicative transfer of MADS box gene to a plant Y chromosome. Mol Biol Evol. 2003, 20: 1062-1069. 10.1093/molbev/msg114.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Zluvova J, Janousek B, Negrutiu I, Vyskot B: Comparison of the X and Y chromosome organization in Silene latifolia. Genetics. 2005, 170: 1431-4. 10.1534/genetics.105.040444.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Nicolas M, Marais G, Hykelova V, Janousek B, Laporte V, Vyskot B, Mouchiroud D, Negrutiu I, Charlesworth D, Monéger F: A gradual process of recombination restriction in the evolutionary history of the sex chromosomes in dioecious plants. PloS Biol. 2005, 3: 47-56. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Kejnovsky E, Kubat Z, Macas J, Hobza R, Mracek J, Vyskot B: A novel family of gypsy-like retrotransposons harboring an amplified tandem repeat. Molecular Genetics and Genomics. 2006, 276: 254-263. 10.1007/s00438-006-0140-x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Matsunaga S, Kawano S, Takano H, Uchida H, Sakai A, Kuroiwa T: Isolation and developmental expression of male reproductive organ-specific genes in a dioecious campion, Melandrium album (Silene latifolia). Plant J. 1996, 10: 679-89. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1996.10040679.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Bergero R, Forrest A, Kamau E, Charlesworth D: Evolutionary strata on the X chromosomes of the dioecious plant Silene latifolia: evidence from new sex-linked genes. Genetics. 2007, 175: 1945-54. 10.1534/genetics.106.070110.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Kejnovský E, Vrána J, Matsunaga S, Soucek P, Siroký J, Dolezel J, Vyskot B: Localization of male-specifically expressed MROS genes of Silene latifolia by PCR on flow-sorted sex chromosomes and autosomes. Genetics. 2001, 158: 1269-77.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Hobza R, Hrusakova P, Safar J, Bartos J, Janousek B, Zluvova J, Michu E, Dolezel J, Vyskot B: MK17, a specific marker closely linked to the gynoecium suppression region on the Y chromosome in Silene latifolia. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2006, 113: 280-287. 10.1007/s00122-006-0293-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Hobza R, Vyskot B: Laser microdissection- based analysis of plant sex chromosomes. Methods Cell Biol. 2007, 82: 433-53. full_text.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Wilson MA, Makova KD: Evolution and survival on eutherian sex chromosomes. PloS Genet. 2009, 5: e1000568-10.1371/journal.pgen.1000568.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Moore RC, Kozyreva O, Lebel-Hardenack S, Siroky J, Hobza R, Vyskot B, Grant SR: Genetic and functional analysis of DD44, a sex-linked gene from the dioecious plant Silene latifolia, provides clues to early events in sex chromosome evolution. Genetics. 2003, 163: 321-334.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Marais G, Nicolas M, Bergero R, Chambrier P, Kejnovsky E, Monéger F, Hobza R, Widmer A, Charlesworth D: Evidence for degeneration of the Y chromosome in the dioecious plant Silene latifolia. Current Biology. 2008, 18: 545-549. 10.1016/j.cub.2008.03.023.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Kubat Z, Hobza R, Vyskot B, Kejnovsky E: Microsatellite accumulation on the Y chromosome in Silene latifolia. Genome. 2008, 51: 350-356. 10.1139/G08-024.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Hobza R, Lengerova M, Svoboda J, Kubekova H, Kejnovsky E, Vyskot B: An accumulation of tandem DNA repeats on the Y chromosome in Silene latifolia during early stages of sex chromosome evolution. Chromosoma. 2006, 115: 376-382. 10.1007/s00412-006-0065-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Kejnovsky E, Kubat Z, Hobza R, Lengerova M, Sato I, Tabata S, Fukui K, Matsunaga S, Vyskot B: Accumulation of chloroplast DNA sequences on the Y chromosome of Silene latifolia. Genetica. 2006, 128: 167-175. 10.1007/s10709-005-5701-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Cermak T, Kubat Z, Hobza R, Koblizkova A, Widmer A, Macas J, Vyskot B, Kejnovsky E: Survey of repetitive sequences in Silene latifolia with respect to their distribution on sex chromosomes. Chromosome Research. 2008, 16: 961-976. 10.1007/s10577-008-1254-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Filatov DA, Howell EC, Groutides C, Armstrong SJ: Recent spread of a retrotransposon in the Silene latifolia genome, apart from the Y chromosome. Genetics. 2009, 181: 811-7. 10.1534/genetics.108.099267.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Pasyukova E, Nuzhdin S, Li W, Flavell AJ: Germ line transposition of the copia retrotransposon in Drosophila melanogaster is restricted to males by tissue-specific control of copia RNA levels. Mol Gen Genet. 1997, 255: 115-24. 10.1007/s004380050479.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Matzke MA, Birchler JA: RNAi-mediated pathways in nucleus. Nat Rev Genet. 2005, 6: 24-35. 10.1038/nrg1500.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Bouzidi MF, Franchel J, Tao Q, Stormo K, Mraz A, Nicolas P, Mouzeyar S: A sunflower BAC library suitable for PCR screening and physical mapping of targeted genomic regions. Theor Appl Genet. 2006, 113: 81-9. 10.1007/s00122-006-0274-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Široký J, Lysák MA, Doležel J, Kejnovský E, Vyskot B: Heterogeneity of rDNA distribution of genome size in Silene spp. Chromosome Research. 2001, 9: 387-393. 10.1023/A:1016783501674.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Sambrook J, Russell DW: Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, New York; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 3 2001,Google Scholar
  45. Lengerova M, Kejnovsky E, Hobza R, Macas J, Grant SR, Vyskot B: Multicolor FISH mapping of the dioecious model plant, Silene latifolia. Theor Appl Genet. 2004, 108: 1193-1199. 10.1007/s00122-003-1568-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Katoh , Asimenos , Toh : Multiple Alignment of DNA Sequences with MAFFT. Bioinformatics for DNA Sequence Analysis edited by D. Posada (outlines DNA alignment methods and several tips including group-to-group alignment and rough clustering of a large number of sequences). Methods in Molecular Biology. 2009, 537: 39-64.Google Scholar
  47. Stephen F, David J: Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990, 215: 403-410.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Burge C, Karlin S: Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. J Mol Biol. 1997, 268: 78-94. 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0951.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Salamov AA, Solovyev VV: Ab initio gene finding in Drosophila genomic DNA. Genome Res. 2000, 10: 516-522. 10.1101/gr.10.4.516.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Tatusov T, Tatusov R: ORF Finder (Open Reading Frame Finder). National Center for Biotechnology Information. National Institute of Health. 2007, []Google Scholar
  51. Marchler-Bauer A, Bryant SH: "CD-Search: protein domain annotations on the fly". Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32: 327-331. 10.1093/nar/gkh454.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ: Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols Methods in Molecular Biology. Edited by: Krawetz S, Misener S. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ,2000,365-386.Google Scholar
  53. Stothard P: The Sequence Manipulation Suite: JavaScript programs for analyzing and formatting protein and DNA sequences. Biotechniques. 2000, 28: 1102-1104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Yang Z: PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24: 1586-91. 10.1093/molbev/msm088.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Gouy M, Guindon S, Gascuel O, SeaView version 4: A multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol Biol Evol. 2010, 27: 221-4. 10.1093/molbev/msp259.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Desfeux C, Maurice S, Henry JP, Lejeune B, Gouyon PH: Evolution of reproductive systems in the genus Silene. Proc Biol Sci. 1996, 263: 409-14. 10.1098/rspb.1996.0062. Ainsworth C: Boys and girls come out to play: The molecular biology dioecious plants. Ann Bot-London 2000, 86: 211-221PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Cegan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.