Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Phylogenetic incongruence in an Asiatic species complex of the genus Caryodaphnopsis (Lauraceae)

Original Submission
9 Dec 2023 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Dec 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
16 Jan 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
8 Feb 2024 Author responded Author comments - Yu Song
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Feb 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Feb 2024 Author responded Author comments - Yu Song
Resubmission - Version 5
9 Feb 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 5
10 Feb 2024 Author responded Author comments - Yu Song
Resubmission - Version 6
10 Feb 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 6
10 Mar 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
15 Mar 2024 Author responded Author comments - Yu Song
Resubmission - Version 7
15 Mar 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 7
17 Mar 2024 Author responded Author comments - Yu Song
Resubmission - Version 8
17 Mar 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 8
17 Mar 2024 Author responded Author comments - Yu Song
Resubmission - Version 9
17 Mar 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 9
2 Apr 2024 Author responded Author comments - Yu Song
Resubmission - Version 10
2 Apr 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 10
18 Apr 2024 Author responded Author comments - Yu Song
Resubmission - Version 11
18 Apr 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 11
19 Apr 2024 Author responded Author comments - Yu Song
Resubmission - Version 12
19 Apr 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 12
Publishing
19 Apr 2024 Editorially accepted
28 Jun 2024 Article published 10.1186/s12870-024-05050-3

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page