Skip to main content

Table 2 Prediction of RNA editing sites

From: Assembly and comparative analysis of the complete multichromosomal mitochondrial genome of Cymbidium ensifolium, an orchid of high economic and ornamental value

Type

RNA editing

Number

Percentage

hydrophilic-hydrophilic

CAC (H) =  > TAC (Y)

10

 

CAT (H) =  > TAT (Y)

18

 

CGC (R) =  > TGC (C)

11

 

CGT (R) =  > TGT (C)

31

 

total

70

13.21%

hydrophilic-hydrophobic

ACA (T) =  > ATA (I)

5

 

ACG (T) =  > ATG (M)

7

 

ACT (T) =  > ATT (I)

5

 

CGG (R) =  > TGG (W)

32

 

TCA (S) =  > TTA (L)

76

 

TCC (S) =  > TTC (F)

37

 

TCG (S) =  > TTG (L)

41

 

TCT (S) =  > TTT (F)

55

 

total

258

48.68%

hydrophilic-stop

CGA (R) =  > TGA (X)

2

 

total

2

0.38%

hydrophobic-hydrophilic

CCA (P) =  > TCA (S)

8

 

CCC (P) =  > TCC (S)

14

 

CCG (P) =  > TCG (S)

7

 

CCT (P) =  > TCT (S)

20

 

total

49

9.25%

hydrophobic-hydrophobic

CCA (P) =  > CTA (L)

48

 

CCC (P) =  > CTC (L)

10

 

CCC (P) =  > TTC (F)

6

 

CCG (P) =  > CTG (L)

26

 

CCT (P) =  > CTT (L)

26

 

CCT (P) =  > TTT (F)

12

 

CTC (L) =  > TTC (F)

5

 

CTT (L) =  > TTT (F)

9

 

GCA (A) =  > GTA (V)

1

 

GCC (A) =  > GTC (V)

1

 

GCG (A) =  > GTG (V)

4

 

GCT (A) =  > GTT (V)

3

 

total

151

28.49%

All

530

100%