Skip to main content

Table 3 Prediction accuracy of six genomic selection (GS) models for five fruit traits based on the confident 31,142 SNPs in three training populations

From: Prediction accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values for fruit traits in cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

GS modela

Training population

Prediction accuracyb

FWc

FWt

FH

PT

Brix

Parametric

RR-BLUP

TGC1

0.822

0.867

0.821

0.856

0.670

TGC2

0.748

0.766

0.687

0.618

0.776

Combined

0.758

0.802

0.719

0.765

0.736

BA

TGC1

0.824

0.868

0.821

0.856

0.673

TGC2

0.744

0.761

0.686

0.624

0.772

Combined

0.775

0.804

0.715

0.765

0.734

BL

TGC1

0.816

0.861

0.815

0.853

0.686

TGC2

0.734

0.779

0.679

0.623

0.779

Combined

0.766

0.799

0.708

0.748

0.739

Non-parametric

RKHS

TGC1

0.828

0.870

0.822

0.859

0.682

TGC2

0.758

0.775

0.700

0.625

0.784

Combined

0.777

0.813

0.738

0.773

0.746

SVM

TGC1

0.804

0.851

0.797

0.860

0.690

TGC2

0.755

0.772

0.669

0.594

0.797

Combined

0.778

0.808

0.723

0.767

0.765

RF

TGC1

0.835

0.865

0.810

0.866

0.702

TGC2

0.780

0.791

0.641

0.643

0.778

Combined

0.812

0.834

0.728

0.807

0.751

  1. aRidge regression-best linear unbiased prediction (RR-BLUP), BayesA (BA), Bayesian LASSO (BL), reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF)
  2. bPrediction accuracy was estimated using the Pearson correlation coefficients between genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) and observed phenotypes
  3. cFW (fruit weight), FWt (fruit width), FH (fruit height), and PT (pericarp thickness)