Skip to main content

Table 3 Significant QTLs detected using high-density linkage map for yield contributing traits in ILs evaluated across the environments created under rainfed situations

From: Dissection of QTLs conferring drought tolerance in B. carinata derived B. juncea introgression lines

Trait

QTL

Env

Chr

Pos

Flanking Markers

LOD

PVE (%)

Add

Marker interval (cM)

Plant height

qPH.2B.1

RE1

2B

10

2B_3291748–2B_1636089

3.26

16.38

-9.88

2.5–15.5

qPH.3B.1

RE2

3B

119

3B_19151635–3B_18990496

2.88

11.55

6.84

116.5–119.5

qPH.9A.1

RE3

9A

72

9A_45604301–9A_3104692

2.78

15.62

13.52

71.5–73.5

Secondary branches/plant

qSB.3B.1

RE1

3B

58

3B_65754767–3B_63675862

3.05

15.66

-4.67

57.5–58.5

qSB.7A.1

RE2

7A

80

7A_6835604–7A_7834496

3.10

5.49

3.01

76.5–82.5

qSB.10A.1

10A

49

10A_17921440–10A_847901

2.95

5.65

2.92

47.5–49.5

Main shoot length

qMSL.3B.1

RE1

3B

103

3B_9101086–3B_22690875

3.19

16.17

-5.28

96.5–111.5

Siliqua length

qSL.2B.1

RE1

2B

64

2B_65115276–2B_64577224

4.32

20.65

0.25

62.5–64.5

qSL.2B.1

RE2

2B

64

2B_65115276–2B_64577224

2.51

12.96

0.25

62.5–64.5

qSL.8A.1

RE3

8A

27

8A_3395566–8A_3395574

2.63

15.07

0.51

26.5–28.5

Seeds/ silique

qSS.9A.1

RE1

9A

24

9A_38513927–9A_5962669

2.82

18.21

2.64

23.5–24.5

qSS.9A.1

RE3

9A

24

9A_38513927–9A_5962669

2.81

13.89

3.32

23.5–24.5

Seed yield/ plant

qSY.3B.1

RE3

3B

100

3B_9101086–3B_22690875

2.74

14.15

-1.74

94.5–103.5

qSY.3B.2

RE2

3B

111

3B_22690875–3B_19151635

3.39

18.34

-2.55

104.5–115.5

Biological yield/plant

qBY.3A.1

RE2

3A

87

3A_2676786–3A_2045625

4.36

8.59

16.55

85.5–87.5

qBY.3B.1

RE2

3B

20

3B_60523215–3B_58467664

3.08

5.53

8.26

16.5–21.5

qBY.3B.2

RE3

3B

101

3B_9101086–3B_22690875

3.03

11.91

-5.44

96.5–104.5

qBY.3B.2

RE2

3B

104

3B_9101086–3B_22690875

5.52

10.75

-8.96

99.5–110.5

1,000 seed weight

qTSW.3B.1

RE3

3B

237

3B_59798024–3B_16518040

2.70

13.66

-0.34

229.5–237.5

qTSW.3B.2

RE1

3B

243

3B_16490510–3B_15005559

3.73

14.58

-0.47

238.5–245

qTSW.3B.2

RE2

3B

242

3B_16490510–3B_15005559

2.98

14.40

-0.31

237.5–245

qTSW.6B.1

RE2

6B

120

6B_17473921–6B_17473911

2.83

11.78

0.24

111.5–126.5

Oil content

qOIL.8A.1

RE1

8A

47

8A_16951000–8A_1068464

2.58

11.49

-1.11

44.5–49

Days to 50% flowering

qDF.5B.1

RE1

5B

9

5B_51917617–5B_48146581

3.48

7.42

10.31

7.5–10.5

qDF.1B.1

RE2

1B

71

1B_56351113–1B_30563611

3.82

17.84

2.57

68.5–72.5

qDF.3B.1

RE3

3B

116

3B_22690875–3B_19151635

3.13

15.07

1.60

110.5–119.5

Days to maturity

qDM.8B.1

RE2

8B

22

8B_69572249–8B_69878598

2.89

16.35

1.95

20.5–22.5

qDM.2B.1

RE3

2B

53

2B_58202892–2B_64284809

3.36

12.41

-4.85

48.5–56.5

  1. Where, Env Environment, Chr Chromosome, Pos Chromosome position (cM) of the QTL, LOD Logarithm of the odds, PVE Phenotypic variance explained (%); Add Additive effect (positive values of the additive effect indicated that alleles from parent ‘BC 4’ were in the direction of increasing trait score and negative indicated that alleles from parent ‘DRMRIJ 31’ were in the direction of increasing trait score); RE1 = 2018–19; RE2 = 2020–21-Delhi; RE3 = 2020–21-Bharatpur