Population size as a major determinant of mating system and population genetic differentiation in a narrow endemic chasmophyte

Table 1 Sampling localities, number of individuals and population genetic parameter estimates for six populations of Moehringia tommasinii and three populations of M. muscosa

Taxon	Pop.	Lat/Long	Elev. (m)	N _ind	N _pg	N _pr	N _ar	H _o	H _e	F _is
M. tommasinii	¹GL	45⁰37’03.2’’/13⁰52’27.9’’	150	230	30	5	3.31	0.46	0.49	0.08*
	OSP	45⁰34’20.5’’/13⁰51’45.9’’	100	1150	30	7	3.73	0.38	0.41	0.07*
	CK	45⁰32’56.8’’/13⁰53’06.8’’	350	714	30	4	3.33	0.37	0.38	0.02
	PP	45⁰31’43.5’’/13⁰54’11.7’’	325	248	30	12	3.81	0.40	0.44	0.08*
	ISTa	45⁰22’42.2’’/13⁰52’55.4’’	60	2730	30	2	3.15	0.41	0.38	-0.10
	ISTb	45⁰22’43.3’’/13⁰53’41.8’’	140	970	30	4	2.76	0.34	0.36	0.05
M. muscosa	¹GL^m	45⁰37’03.2’’/13⁰52’27.9’’	150	/	16	5	3.17	0.41	0.55	0.24*
	VDC^m	45⁰28’26.4’’/14⁰04’59.3’’	780	/	21	3	3.22	0.48	0.51	0.05*
	OBR^m	45⁰28’13.6’’/14⁰27’23.4’’	1170	/	/	/	/	/	/	/

Pop.–population’s acronyms, Lat/Long in WGS84, Elev.–elevation, N _ind–number of individuals per population, N _pg–number of samples for population genetic analysis per population, N _pr–number of private allels, N _ar–allelic richness, H _o–detected heterozygosity, H _e–expected heterozygosity, F _is–within-population fixation index, ¹Sympatric population with M. tommasinii and M. muscosa, * significance at the p < 0.05, dash indicates lack of information

ISSN: 1471-2229