Skip to main content

Table 4 Means and standard deviation of malt quality parameters for high performing RIL, Otis and Golden Promise cultivars for year 2020 under dryland conditions

From: QTL mapping of shoot and seed traits impacted by Drought in Barley using a recombinant inbred line Population

RIL

DP

AA

ME (%)

BG (ppm)

FAN (ppm)

Wort SP (%)

Total Protein (%)

S/T (%)

15

84 ± 6

37 ± 1

73 ± 1

1058 ± 94

141 ± 1

3.2 ± 0.04

13.34 ± 0.03

23 ± 0.4

23

93 ± 20

27 ± 6

72 ± 5

1039 ± 161

121 ± 3

3.11 ± 0.05

14.07 ± 0.41

21 ± 0.3

83

105 ± 8

51 ± 1

75 ± 1

744 ± 369

171 ± 1

4.0 ± 0.00

14.04 ± 0.11

27 ± 0.1

126

118 ± 1

25 ± 4

70 ± 2

1278 ± 8

98 ± 1

2.96 ± 0.06

15.98 ± 0.35

18 ± 0.1

150

71 ± 4

25 ± 1

72 ± 1

1309 ± 41

117 ± 4

3.17 ± 0.17

16.36 ± 0.88

19 ± 2.0

GP

124 ± 5

66 ± 2

78 ± 1

284 ± 144

154 ± 7

3.98 ± 0.13

13.74 ± 0.23

28 ± 0.5

Otis

82 ± 4

33 ± 2

74 ± 1

1248 ± 4

144 ± 18

3.38 ± 0.35

15.38 ± 0.59

21 ± 1.3

  1. High performing lines were selected as described in materials and methods. AA, alpha amylase; DP, diastatic power; ME, Malt extract; BG, beta glucan; FAN, free amino nitrogen; SP, malt soluble protein; S/T, soluble protein/total protein; DWB, reported on dry weight basis