Skip to main content

Table 1 Information about name, mean dry forage yield, and stability parameter of 21 parental genotypes and 42 full-sib families of tall fescue used in this study

From: Genetic parameters and selection in full-sib families of tall fescue using best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) analysis

Parental genotypes Full-sib families
Parental genotype name Origin Maternal genotype Paternal genotype Mean dry forage yield (g/plant) Yield stability (bi) Full-sib family code Parental plants Number of genotype in each full-sib family Mean dry forage yield (g/plant) Yield stability (bi) Full-sib family code Parental plants Number of genotype in each full-sib family Mean dry forage yield (g/plant) Yield stability (bi)
1E Iran, Isfahan,Yazdabad Yes Yes 76.8 1.14 1 ♀1E × ♂2E 2 352.41 0.58 22 ♀17 M × ♂1 M 7 160 1.18
2E Iran,Yasuj No Yes 87.24 0.54 2 ♀1E × ♂4E 1 223.91 0.51 23 ♀17 M × ♂2 L 1 292.7 0.51
3E Iran, Isfahan, Mobarake Yes No 39.45 1.86a 3 ♀1E × ♂1 M 6 135.54 1.46 24 ♀21 M × ♂14E 2 158.72 1.24
4E Iran, Isfahan, Mobarake Yes Yes 49.76 1.65a 4 ♀3E × ♂10E 2 159.37 1.20 25 ♀21 M × ♂1 M 3 200.69 0.93
10E USA, New Jersy Yes Yes 41.47 2.09a 5 ♀3E × ♂14E 2 178.31 1.08 26 ♀21 M × ♂11 M 2 307.74 0.96
14E Hungary, unknown Yes Yes 88.26 0.81 6 ♀3E × ♂1 M 1 73.16 1.91a 27 ♀21 M × ♂6 L 1 190.62 0.46
16E Iran, Isfahan, Fozve No Yes 77.54 0.55 7 ♀3E × ♂11 M 3 149.16 1.31 28 ♀22 M × ♂4E 2 144.45 1.26
1 M Iran, Isfahan,Yazdabad Yes Yes 132.35 1.02 8 ♀4E × ♂11 M 2 294.74 0.57 29 ♀22 M × ♂10E 1 92.58 2.06a
3 M Iran, Yasuj Yes No 72.27 0.57 9 ♀4E × ♂17 M 3 195.9 0.87 30 ♀22 M × ♂1 M 2 201.7 0.73
11 M Hungary, unknown Yes Yes 55.67 1.59 10 ♀10E × ♂1 M 5 200.23 0.8 31 ♀22 M × ♂21 M 1 107.7 1.92a
17 M Iran, Isfahan, Fozve Yes Yes 58.57 1.24 11 ♀14E × ♂1E 1 146.41 1.14 32 ♀23 M × ♂14E 2 290.45 0.55
21 M Iran, Isfahan, Fozve Yes Yes 141.44 0.97 12 ♀14E × ♂2E 11 198.3 1.03 33 ♀23 M × ♂17 M 2 168.66 1.12
22 M Poland, unknown Yes No 37.8 2.26a 13 ♀14E × ♂25 L 2 276.55 0.7 34 ♀23 M × ♂3 L 2 237.22 0.94
23 M Poland, unknown Yes No 133.52 1 14 ♀14E × ♂11 M 6 181.19 1.06 35 ♀23 M × ♂15 L 1 194.66 0.66
2 L Iran, Isfahan, Daran No Yes 45.58 1.43 15 ♀1 M × ♂21 M 3 148.85 1.13 36 ♀6 L × ♂1E 2 97.51 1.94a
3 L Iran, Isfahan, Yasuj No Yes 93.85 0.59 16 ♀3 M × ♂2E 3 225.66 0.78 37 ♀6 L × ♂1 M 1 194.58 0.81
6 L Iran, Isfahan, Daran Yes Yes 129.89 0.45 17 ♀3 M × ♂1 M 4 203.19 0.58 38 ♀12 L × ♂1E 6 246.66 0.95
12 L Iran, Isfahan, Daran Yes No 117.65 0.66 18 ♀3 M × ♂6 L 1 102.83 1.86a 39 ♀12 L × ♂1 M 4 184.42 0.97
15 L Hungary, unknown No Yes 64.53 1.01 19 ♀11 M × ♂2E 9 195.01 1.02 40 ♀12 L × ♂2 L 3 287.84 0.64
20 L Iran, Isfahan, Yazdabad Yes No 165.74 0.59 20 ♀11 M × ♂16E 1 159.41 1.19 41 ♀20 L × ♂4E 4 300.85 0.95
25 L Iran, Isfahan, Fozve No Yes 121.74 0.76 21 ♀11 M × ♂1 M 1 130.7 1.22 42 ♀20 L × ♂14E 2 288.81 0.59
  1. aSignificantly different from 1 for bi at the 0.05 probability level