Skip to main content

Table 1 Information about name, mean dry forage yield, and stability parameter of 21 parental genotypes and 42 full-sib families of tall fescue used in this study

From: Genetic parameters and selection in full-sib families of tall fescue using best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) analysis

Parental genotypes

Full-sib families

Parental genotype name

Origin

Maternal genotype

Paternal genotype

Mean dry forage yield (g/plant)

Yield stability (bi)

Full-sib family code

Parental plants

Number of genotype in each full-sib family

Mean dry forage yield (g/plant)

Yield stability (bi)

Full-sib family code

Parental plants

Number of genotype in each full-sib family

Mean dry forage yield (g/plant)

Yield stability (bi)

1E

Iran, Isfahan,Yazdabad

Yes

Yes

76.8

1.14

1

♀1E × ♂2E

2

352.41

0.58

22

♀17 M × ♂1 M

7

160

1.18

2E

Iran,Yasuj

No

Yes

87.24

0.54

2

♀1E × ♂4E

1

223.91

0.51

23

♀17 M × ♂2 L

1

292.7

0.51

3E

Iran, Isfahan, Mobarake

Yes

No

39.45

1.86a

3

♀1E × ♂1 M

6

135.54

1.46

24

♀21 M × ♂14E

2

158.72

1.24

4E

Iran, Isfahan, Mobarake

Yes

Yes

49.76

1.65a

4

♀3E × ♂10E

2

159.37

1.20

25

♀21 M × ♂1 M

3

200.69

0.93

10E

USA, New Jersy

Yes

Yes

41.47

2.09a

5

♀3E × ♂14E

2

178.31

1.08

26

♀21 M × ♂11 M

2

307.74

0.96

14E

Hungary, unknown

Yes

Yes

88.26

0.81

6

♀3E × ♂1 M

1

73.16

1.91a

27

♀21 M × ♂6 L

1

190.62

0.46

16E

Iran, Isfahan, Fozve

No

Yes

77.54

0.55

7

♀3E × ♂11 M

3

149.16

1.31

28

♀22 M × ♂4E

2

144.45

1.26

1 M

Iran, Isfahan,Yazdabad

Yes

Yes

132.35

1.02

8

♀4E × ♂11 M

2

294.74

0.57

29

♀22 M × ♂10E

1

92.58

2.06a

3 M

Iran, Yasuj

Yes

No

72.27

0.57

9

♀4E × ♂17 M

3

195.9

0.87

30

♀22 M × ♂1 M

2

201.7

0.73

11 M

Hungary, unknown

Yes

Yes

55.67

1.59

10

♀10E × ♂1 M

5

200.23

0.8

31

♀22 M × ♂21 M

1

107.7

1.92a

17 M

Iran, Isfahan, Fozve

Yes

Yes

58.57

1.24

11

♀14E × ♂1E

1

146.41

1.14

32

♀23 M × ♂14E

2

290.45

0.55

21 M

Iran, Isfahan, Fozve

Yes

Yes

141.44

0.97

12

♀14E × ♂2E

11

198.3

1.03

33

♀23 M × ♂17 M

2

168.66

1.12

22 M

Poland, unknown

Yes

No

37.8

2.26a

13

♀14E × ♂25 L

2

276.55

0.7

34

♀23 M × ♂3 L

2

237.22

0.94

23 M

Poland, unknown

Yes

No

133.52

1

14

♀14E × ♂11 M

6

181.19

1.06

35

♀23 M × ♂15 L

1

194.66

0.66

2 L

Iran, Isfahan, Daran

No

Yes

45.58

1.43

15

♀1 M × ♂21 M

3

148.85

1.13

36

♀6 L × ♂1E

2

97.51

1.94a

3 L

Iran, Isfahan, Yasuj

No

Yes

93.85

0.59

16

♀3 M × ♂2E

3

225.66

0.78

37

♀6 L × ♂1 M

1

194.58

0.81

6 L

Iran, Isfahan, Daran

Yes

Yes

129.89

0.45

17

♀3 M × ♂1 M

4

203.19

0.58

38

♀12 L × ♂1E

6

246.66

0.95

12 L

Iran, Isfahan, Daran

Yes

No

117.65

0.66

18

♀3 M × ♂6 L

1

102.83

1.86a

39

♀12 L × ♂1 M

4

184.42

0.97

15 L

Hungary, unknown

No

Yes

64.53

1.01

19

♀11 M × ♂2E

9

195.01

1.02

40

♀12 L × ♂2 L

3

287.84

0.64

20 L

Iran, Isfahan, Yazdabad

Yes

No

165.74

0.59

20

♀11 M × ♂16E

1

159.41

1.19

41

♀20 L × ♂4E

4

300.85

0.95

25 L

Iran, Isfahan, Fozve

No

Yes

121.74

0.76

21

♀11 M × ♂1 M

1

130.7

1.22

42

♀20 L × ♂14E

2

288.81

0.59

  1. aSignificantly different from 1 for bi at the 0.05 probability level