Linkage and QTL mapping for tuber shape and specific gravity in a tetraploid mapping population of potato representing the russet market class

Park, Jaebum; Massa, Alicia N.; Douches, David; Coombs, Joseph; Akdemir, Deniz; Yencho, G. Craig; Whitworth, Jonathan L.; Novy, Richard G.

doi:10.1186/s12870-021-03265-2

Table 4 Location comparison of QTL and linked SNPs between the A05141 mapping population and previously published references on molecular markers associated with potato tuber shape

From: Linkage and QTL mapping for tuber shape and specific gravity in a tetraploid mapping population of potato representing the russet market class

QTL ^a (Traits)	ch	SNPs ^b	Phy. Map. Pos. ^c	Molecular markers from references ^d	References	Reference Marker phy. Map. Pos. ^e	Dist. Bet. our SNP and reference SNP (cM) ^f
*TS_QTL_ch04_a* *(TS_clo)* *TS_QTL_ch04_b* *(TS_clo_ID)* *TS_QTL_ch04_c* *(TS_clo_ID_2010)*	4	^ac2_54790	1,151,453	pPt-651,535	Hara-Skrzypiec et al. 2018	~ 8,825,900	7.67
*TS_QTL_ch10_a* *(TS_clo)* *TS_QTL_ch10_b* *(TS_clo_ID)* *TS_QTL_ch10_d* *(TS_clo_2010)* *TS_QTL_ch10_e* *(TS_clo_2011)* *TS_QTL_ch10_f* *(TS_clo_ID_2010)* *TS_QTL_ch10_g* *(TS_clo_ID_2011)* *TS_QTL_ch10_h* *(TS_clo_NC_2010)* *TS_QTL_ch10_i* *(TS_clo_NC_2011)*	10	^ac1_15594	50,187,264	^ac2_27831	A. Massa, pers. comm.	50,806,407	0.62
				pPt-559,534	Hara-Skrzypiec et al. 2018	~ 49,356,600	0.83
				^ac2_45606	Endelman & Jansky 2016	48,218,820	1.97
				^ac2_25485	Endelman & Jansky 2016	48,737,840	1.45
				^ac1_16351	Endelman & Jansky 2016	48,761,642	1.43
				^ac1_8020	Endelman & Jansky 2016	48,863,048	1.32
				^ac1_11540	Endelman & Jansky 2016	49,659,510	0.53
				^ac2_27795	Endelman & Jansky 2016	50,458,044	0.27
				^ac2_27821	Endelman & Jansky 2016	50,649,574	0.46
				^ac2_27829	Endelman & Jansky 2016	50,782,097	0.59
				^ac2_53946	Endelman & Jansky 2016	51,926,830	1.74
*TS_QTL_ch10_c* *(TS_clo_NC)*	10	^ac1_11535	49,553,136	^ac2_27831	A. Massa, pers. comm.	50,806,407	1.25
				pPt-559,534	Hara-Skrzypiec et al. 2018	~ 49,356,600	0.20
				^ac2_45606	Endelman & Jansky 2016	48,218,820	1.33
				^ac2_25485	Endelman & Jansky 2016	48,737,840	0.82
				^ac1_16351	Endelman & Jansky 2016	48,761,642	0.79
				^ac1_8020	Endelman & Jansky 2016	48,863,048	0.69
				^ac1_11540	Endelman & Jansky 2016	49,659,510	0.11
				^ac2_27795	Endelman & Jansky 2016	50,458,044	0.90
				^ac2_27821	Endelman & Jansky 2016	50,649,574	1.10
				^ac2_27829	Endelman & Jansky 2016	50,782,097	1.23
				^ac2_53946	Endelman & Jansky 2016	51,926,830	2.37

^aThe titles of the mapped QTL and the BLUP data sets used
^bThe SNPs where the significant QTL peaks are located
^cPhysical map position of the SNPs above; Physical map position of each SNP was obtained by SPUD database
^dSNPs or other diversity array technology (DArT) markers analyzed by references; Those markers are linked to tuber shape and eye depth
^eThe physical map position of the SNP and DArT markers analyzed by references
^fThe distance between SNPs identified in this study and other SNPs (or DArT markers) studied in the references
^a “solcap_snp_” was omitted at the beginning of all the SNP marker names

Back to article page

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com

BMC Plant Biology

Contact us