Skip to main content

Table 1 Evaluation of Qingliu resistance to N. lugens using SSST and MSST

From: Transcriptomics identifies key defense mechanisms in rice resistant to both leaf-feeding and phloem feeding herbivores

Standard seedbox screening test (SSST)

 Variety

Mudgo

Qingliu

H105

TN1

TNG67

Baiqiaowan

 Damage score

5.0 ± 0.0c

5.0 ± 0.0c

5.0 ± 0.0c

8.3 ± 1.2a

7.0 ± 0.0b

9.0 ± 0.0a

p-value

2.37E-07

Modified seedbox screening test (MSST)

 Variety

Mudgo

Qingliu

H105

TN1

TNG67

Baiqiaowan

 Damage score

5.0 ± 0.0c

5.0 ± 0.0c

5.7 ± 1.2bc

7.0 ± 0.0ab

8.3 ± 1.2a

8.3 ± 1.2a

p-value

0.000388

  1. Two BPH-moderately resistant checks: Mudgo and H105. Two BPH-susceptible checks: TN1 and TNG67. The average damage score ± SD from three experimental repeats was analyzed with two-way ANOVA and LSD post hoc test with different letters denoting a significant difference (p < 0.05)