Skip to main content

Table 2 Genetic statistics of the studied 10 oak populations

From: Hybridization and introgression in sympatric and allopatric populations of four oak species

Population

Null

NA

NE

HO

HE

AR

HS

FIS

FIS'

BY-A

0.140a

12.8

7.9

0.579

0.844

11.8

0.848

0.317*

0.027

BY-V

0.170a

10.2

6.3

0.505

0.791

9.6

0.797

0.366*

0.008

LT-F

0.102a

12.6

7.1

0.692

0.854

11.1

0.856

0.192*

0.005a

LT-B

0.110a

11.3

6.6

0.610

0.821

11.2

0.831

0.267*

0.042

ZW-V

0.181a

9.3

5.8

0.465

0.777

8.7

0.782

0.406*

0.018

ZW-B

0.169a

11.1

6.1

0.516

0.817

10.2

0.822

0.373*

0.021a

ZJ-A

0.106a

11.6

6.6

0.492

0.828

10.6

0.834

0.410

0.186

ZJ-V

0.188a

11.6

6.3

0.443

0.818

10.8

0.824

0.463*

0.065

ZJ-F

0.137a

12.6

7.4

0.579

0.858

11.5

0.862

0.328*

0.035

ZJ-B

0.111a

11.6

6.7

0.621

0.826

11.0

0.830

0.252*

0.023

mean

 

11.5

6.7

0.550

0.753

10.7

0.829

  
  1. NA number of alleles, NE effective number of alleles, AR allelic richness with rarefaction to the common sample size of 10, HO observed heterozygosity averaged across loci, HE expected heterozygosity averaged across loci, HS genetic diversity within populations averaged across loci, FIS inbreeding coefficient, FIS' corrected inbreeding coefficient estimated in INEST version 2.2 (Chybicki and Burczyk 2009) based on the nfb model (where n = null alleles, f = inbreeding coefficient and b = genotyping failures). aDeviance information criterion (DIC) values support the significance of null alleles or inbreeding in the nfb model; *P < 0.05