Proteome and transcriptome analyses reveal key molecular differences between quality parameters of commercial-ripe and tree-ripe fig (Ficus carica L.)

Table 1 Key and differentially expressed proteins in sugar accumulation

Accession	Description	Annotation database	p-value	Ratio	PSMs
c26558_g1	Sucrose synthase 2	RNA-Seq assembly	0.00	1.28	35
^ac44769_g2	Sucrose-phosphate synthase 1	RNA-Seq assembly	0.03	1.52	10
^ac41752_g1	Hexokinase-1	RNA-Seq assembly	0.04	1.36	12
^aW9S032	Alpha-1,4 glucan phosphorylase	Morus notabilis	0.00	1.34	25
^aW9QQH1	Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase	Morus notabilis	0.00	0.75	66
^aW9S728	Triosephosphate isomerase	Morus notabilis	0.00	0.76	45
^aW9R6S4	Triosephosphate isomerase	Morus notabilis	0.00	0.61	10
^aW9S4U6	Triosephosphate isomerase	Morus notabilis	0.01	0.66	18
^aW9SM44	GDP-mannose 3,5-epimerase 1	Morus notabilis	0.01	0.73	4
^ac43883_g3	UDP-glucose glucosyltransferase	RNA-Seq assembly	0.00	1.31	122

^afold change ≥1.3; PSM, peptide-spectrum match; Ratio: tree-ripe/commercial-ripe

ISSN: 1471-2229