Skip to main content

Table 2 Genetic and genotypic diversity measurements

From: Evolution of almond genetic diversity and farmer practices in Lebanon: impacts of the diffusion of a graft-propagated cultivar in a traditional system based on seed-propagation

Pop Genotypic Diversity % LD(G) Genetic diversity
N G R PI (N) Ar+ Pa+ Ho (N) He (N) Fis (N) Fis (G)#
Halwani 284 195 0.69 1.20E-13 95 4.80 (0.36) 2.01 (0.31) 0.67 (0.07) 0.66 (0.04) −0.03 0
HB_Bi 23 8 0.32 4.40E-11 42 3.60 (0.25) 0.02 (0.01) 0.70 (0.08) 0.62 (0.03) −0.12*
HB_Fe 33 14 0.41 7.60E-08 77 2.89 (0.20) 0.10 (0.07) 0.62 (0.12) 0.47 (0.06) −0.34*
HB_NA 30 19 0.62 2.20E-12 83 3.93 (0.25) 0.04 (0.02) 0.74 (0.08) 0.64 (0.05) −0.15 −0.08*
HB_Ze 16 7 0.4 1.50E-06 14 2.12 (0.18) 0.00 (0.00) 0.54 (0.12) 0.42 (0.06) −0.28*
HM_Am 29 27 0.93 2.60E-08 20 2.86 (0.29) 0.12 (0.08) 0.63 (0.09) 0.49 (0.06) −0.33* −0.30*
HM_Ma 30 21 0.69 6.10E-09 21 2.96 (0.24) 0.05 (0.03) 0.75 (0.09) 0.52 (0.05) −0.45* −0.39*
HM_Je 30 29 0.97 1.60E-17 52 6.10 (0.40) 0.21 (0.06) 0.66 (0.04) 0.76 (0.03) 0.13* 0.14*
HN_Bc 32 22 0.68 6.80E-11 70 3.65 (0.32) 0.03 (0.01) 0.75 (0.08) 0.59 (0.05) −0.28 −0.21*
HN_Bt 23 23 1 7.70E-12 43 3.91 (0.51) 0.20 (0.09) 0.62 (0.08) 0.60 (0.07) −0.03 −0.03
HS_DQ 23 14 0.59 6.30E-08 50 2.93 (0.25) 0.02 (0.02) 0.73 (0.11) 0.48 (0.06) −0.56*
HS_T a 15 10 0.64 7.90E-09 18 3.10 (0.24) 0.07 (0.03) 0.52 (0.08) 0.51 (0.06) −0.06*
Khachabi 331 314 0.95 1.80E-25 74 8.28 (0.50) 5.48 (0.45) 0.68 (0.05) 0.86 (0.03) 0.20 0.20*
KB_Ba 26 26 1 2.30E-21 3 7.23 (0.47) 0.23 (0.07) 0.64 (0.05) 0.84 (0.03) 0.24 0.24*
KB_Bi 20 20 1 4.40E-16 21 6.08 (0.41) 0.29 (0.08) 0.70 (0.06) 0.74 (0.03) 0.05 0.05*
KB_EM 30 30 1 2.80E-21 13 7.47 (0.49) 0.22 (0.06) 0.73 (0.05) 0.82 (0.03) 0.12 0.12*
KB_Ir 15 15 1 3.70E-18 33 6.31 (0.47) 0.41 (0.14) 0.72 (0.06) 0.79 (0.04) 0.10* 0.10*
KB_KL 30 29 0.97 1.50E-20 13 7.01 (0.46) 0.26 (0.07) 0.70 (0.05) 0.83 (0.02) 0.15 0.15*
KB_Lu 30 30 1 1.10E-20 14 6.92 (0.43) 0.31 (0.06) 0.73 (0.05) 0.83 (0.03) 0.13 0.13*
KB_Sh 18 18 1 1.40E-17 37 6.19 (0.37) 0.23 (0.11) 0.63 (0.06) 0.78 (0.04) 0.18 0.18*
KN_As 16 16 1 3.10E-19 20 6.92 (0.53) 0.41 (0.12) 0.62 (0.07) 0.80 (0.04) 0.22 0.22*
KN_EQ 16 16 1 8.20E-19 14 6.83 (0.52) 0.56 (0.13) 0.62 (0.06) 0.79 (0.05) 0.22* 0.22*
KS_Ba 30 30 1 7.20E-21 22 7.20 (0.48) 0.32 (0.08) 0.71 (0.06) 0.82 (0.03) 0.12 0.12*
KS_Bl 29 29 1 2.40E-19 18 6.71 (0.42) 0.18 (0.06) 0.67 (0.05) 0.80 (0.03) 0.16 0.16*
KS_Ch 23 21 0.91 1.30E-20 25 7.14 (0.47) 0.37 (0.12) 0.71 (0.05) 0.83 (0.03) 0.14 0.15*
KS_MJ 18 17 0.94 2.90E-17 19 5.91 (0.40) 0.12 (0.05) 0.71 (0.06) 0.77 (0.04) 0.08 0.07*
KS_T a 30 18 0.59 1.80E-15 52 5.32 (0.30) 0.13 (0.04) 0.65 (0.08) 0.73 (0.03) 0.11* 0.15*
  1. N, Number of samples; G, Number of distinct genotypes; R, Proportion of distinct genotypes = (G-1)/(N-1); PI, probability of identity of two genotypes; %LD: percentage of genotypic linkage disequilibrium based on a single MLG copy; Ar+, average number of alleles per locus; Pa+, mean number of private alleles per locus; Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, unbiased expected heterozygosity; Fis, inbreeding coefficient
  2. +Standardized population at G = 15 using rarefaction method
  3. #Fis calculated for sample size over 15 individuals
  4. *Significant departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P ≥ 0.05)
  5. X(N) Values calculated based on N matrix
  6. X(G) Values calculated based on G matrix
  7. Standard errors are in brackets