Skip to main content

Table 1 Relative evolution rate (ERaBLE output was normalized by rate of evolution in concatenated RNA- and protein-coding sequences) in different regions of IR

From: Comparative analysis of inverted repeats of polypod fern (Polypodiales) plastomes reveals two hypervariable regions

Region All Polypodiales Eupolypods 1 Eupolypods 2 Dennstaedtiaceae + Pteridium
Intergene1 1,27 1,43 1,22 1,65
ndhB 2,46 3,50 2,78 2,83
Intergene2 11,52 12,55 10,86 14,59
trnT-UGU 16,59 26,18 3,11 31,63
Intergene3 2,68 3,32 2,20 3,45
trnL-CAA 2,20 3,24 2,44 2,53
Intergene3p 5,43 8,53 6,47 5,13
trnR-ACG 85,25 0,00 138,59 0,00
Intergene4 10,11 13,42 12,65 10,99
rrn5 0,15 0,22 0,27 0,11
Intergene5 7,25 0,46 8,02 7,12
Intergene6 2,35 2,49 3,46 0,93
rrn23 0,78 9,81 1,77 0,30
Intergene7 2,97 2,51 4,30 2,26
trnA-UGC 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
Intergene8 22,93 10,48 59,98 11,34
orf42 530,31 1221,25 3,38 3,77
Intergene9 0,74 1,05 0,86 0,73
trnA-UGC2 0,02 0,04 0,00 0,00
Intergene10 2,67 16,92 1,71 1,70
trnI-GAU 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
Intergene11 2,07 3,40 2,61 2,22
ycf68 2,87 2,55 8,39 1,07
Intergene12 68,77 41,48 245,28 15,63
trnI-GAU2 2,31 5,57 0,00 0,00
Intergene13 3,01 4,05 3,76 3,10
rrn16 0,42 0,18 0,97 0,20
Intergene14 9,37 27,47 11,23 8,26
rps12 1,88 2,13 2,77 1,44
Intergene15 1,43 1,48 1,24 1,59
rps7 2,20 2,32 2,65 1,83
Intergene16 7,31 7,69 7,79 7,57
psbA 1,42 1,89 1,78 1,30
Intergene17 2,57 4,21 2,63 2,91
trnH-GUG 0,35 0,86 0,00 0,01
Intergene18 3,14 1,92 3,36 4,20
Intergene19 5,47 5,07 4,97 6,56
trnN-GUU 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
Intergene20 3,02 5,42 3,27 4,03
  1. The bolded rows marked intergenic spacers there LRT for the branch site model A was significantly better than the model B. (Model A was used for the ribosomal RNA and non-coding regions and supposes that substitutions in a DNA sequences of different tree branches are homogenous, model B – the same but supposes non-homogenous substitutions, see also materials and methods)
\