Skip to main content

Table 2 Analysis of transient carbohydrates in control and complemented lines

From: Effective carbon partitioning driven by exotic phloem-specific regulatory elements fused to the Arabidopsis thaliana AtSUC2 sucrose-proton symporter gene

Representative line

Carbohydrate

Lamina

petiole

WT

Glu

2.28 ± 0.95

0.51 ± 0.02

(Col-0)a

Fru

0.80 ± 0.36

0.14 ± 0.03

 

Suc

1.72 ± 0.76

0.35 ± 0.07

 

Starchb

59.53 ± 4.96

8.28 ± 3.68

 

Total

64.33 ± 4.42

9.28 ± 3.79

SUC2p::cSUC2

Glu

1.40 ± 0.42

0.53 ± 0.15

(line 1039)a

Fru

0.42 ± 0.12

0.12 ± 0.02

 

Suc

1.40 ± 0.40

0.35 ± 0.07

 

Starch

84.60 ± 18.20c

12.02 ± 3.64

 

Total

87.83 ± 18.17c

13.02 ± 3.60

CoYMVp::cSUC2

Glu

1.11 ± 0.22

0.55 ± 0.08

(line 1070)

Fru

0.41 ± 0.13

0.14 ± 0.03

 

Suc

1.90 ± 0.07

0.43 ± 0.04

 

Starch

46.55 ± 4.50d

10.92 ± 2.55

 

Total

49.96 ± 4.20d

12.04 ± 2.56

RolCp::cSUC2

Glu

15.41 ± 4.24c

0.67 ± 0.15

(line 1133)

Fru

3.44 ± 1.05c

0.17 ± 0.04

 

Suc

11.50 ± 1.79c

0.52 ± 0.03c

 

Starch

547.63 ± 117.90c

34.50 ± 6.80c

 

Total

577.97 ± 113.92c

35.87 ± 6.98c

  1. Sugar and starch in the lamina (excluding midrib) and petiole of the indicated plant lines after 30 days of growth. The first three mature leaves from each plant were pooled for extraction, and variation (standard deviation) calculated from n = 3 to 5 sibling plants. Sugars levels are expressed as nmoles per milligram fresh weight, and starch is expressed as glucose equivalents.
  2. a [25]
  3. b Expressed as glucose equivalents
  4. c Significant increase relative to wild type; Students T-test, p < 0.05
  5. d Significant decrease relative to wild type; Students T-test, p < 0.05