Skip to main content

Table 3 Effect of cold acclimation on TSS (mg g -1 DW) and starch (mg g -1 DW) changes in leaves and roots of plants of both Andean and Antarctic ecotypes of C. quitensis exposed to PhT and recovery period

From: Cold-acclimation limits low temperature induced photoinhibition by promoting a higher photochemical quantum yield and a more effective PSII restoration in darkness in the Antarctic rather than the Andean ecotype of Colobanthus quitensis Kunt Bartl (Cariophyllaceae)

   

Leaves

Roots

Acclimation

Ecotype

Treatment

TSS

Starch

TSS

Starch

Non- acclimated

Andean

Initial

53 ± 3(e)

15 ± 2(cde)

21 ± 1(de)

5 ± 2(f))

  

PhT.

66 ± 3(cd)

13 ± 2(cdef)

13 ± 1(e)

8 ± 2(ef)

  

Recovery

124 ± 1(a)

11 ± 3(efg)

18 ± 1(de)

5 ± 2(f)

 

Antarctic

Initial

53 ± 2(e)

17 ± 3(cd)

68 ± 7(b)

13 ± 2(bcde)

  

PhT.

59 ± 1(de)

18 ± 2(c)

27 ± 3(d)

12 ± 3(cde)

  

Recovery

38 ± 4(f)

13 ± 2(cdef)

27 ± 4(d)

9 ± 2(def)

Cold- acclimated

Andean

Initial

96 ± 1(b)

25 ± 2(b)

58 ± 5(b)

19 ± 2(b)

  

PhT.

71 ± 6(cd)

7 ± 2(fg)

45 ± 1(c)

15 ± 2(bcd)

  

Recovery

77 ± 5(c)

10 ± 1(efg)

11 ± 1(e)

13 ± 2(bcde)

 

Antarctic

Initial

99 ± 12(b)

33 ± 3(a)

28 ± 5(d)

27 ± 3(a)

  

PhT.

59 ± 5(de)

8 ± 2(fg)

29 ± 3(d)

18 ± 2(bc)

  

Recovery

66 ± 3(cde)

6 ± 2(g)

87 ± 7(a)

14 ± 2(bcde)

  1. Results show mean values ± SE of five different individuals. Different letters represent significant differences between acclimation, treatment and ecotypes P<0.05 using three-way ANOVA.