Skip to main content
Download PDF

Investigating the synergistic effects of biochar, trans-zeatin riboside, and Azospirillum brasilense on soil improvement and enzymatic activity in water-stressed wheat

BMC Plant Biology volume 24, Article number: 314 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Water stress is a major danger to crop yield, hence new approaches to strengthen plant resilience must be developed. To lessen the negative effects of water stress on wheat plants, present study was arranged to investigate the role of synergistic effects of biochar, trans-zeatin riboside (t-ZR), and Azospirillum brasilense on soil improvement and enzymatic activity in water-stressed wheat.

Results

In a three-replication experiment comprising of four treatments (T0: Control, T1: Drought stress (DS), T2: DS + t-ZR with biochar, T3: DS + A. brasilense with biochar), we observed notable improvements in soil quality and enzymatic activities in water-stressed wheat plants with the application of t-ZR and A. brasilense with biochar. In drought stress, Treatment having the application of A. brasilense with biochar performs best as compared to the other and significant increased the enzymatic activities such as peroxidase (7.36%), catalase (8.53%), superoxide dismutase (6.01%), polyphenol oxidase (14.14%), and amylase (16.36%) in wheat plants. Different enzymatic activities showed different trends of results. Soil organic C, dissolved organic C, dissolved organic N also enhanced 29.46%, 8.59%, 22.70% respectively with the application of A. brasilense with biochar under drought stress condition.

Conclusions

The synergistic action of A. brasilense and biochar creates an effective microbiological environment that supports essential plant physiological processes during drought stress. This enhancement is attributed to improved soil fertility and increased organic matter content, highlighting the potential of these novel strategies in mitigating water stress effects and enhancing crop resilience.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) has much greater significance beyond its use as a staple grain. It has greatly influenced the development of culture and economy, fostering the emergence of modern societies and the flourishing of civilizations [1]. Wheat is a symbol of durability and a testament to agricultural human ingenuity because of its adaptability and persistence. Wheat is important because it is a major component of the world’s food supply and grows well in a variety of environments [2]. It is the need to enhance the wheat production on sustainable basis under the current climatic change and the growing global population scenario [3]. Lack of water, extreme heat, and irregular rain patterns can all negatively impact the amount of wheat production [4, 5]. These challenges require a thorough understanding of the mechanisms underlying drought stress in wheat in addition to the development of innovative mitigation strategies [6].

Drought stress poses a serious threat to crop yield worldwide [7]. It is a major concern in the agricultural sector for causing food insecurity. Wheat crop is very crucial for global nutrition and has been significantly harmed by environmental challenges [4]. The twenty-first century is bringing with it more and more clear evidence of climate change, which is increasing the frequency and intensity of droughts [8]. Wheat plant and soil enzymatic activity plays a critical role in determining the overall health and productivity of these essential agricultural components. It’s still unclear how these enzyme activities relate to the way they respond to drought stress [9]. To better understand how plants withstand dry conditions and develop strategies to mitigate the detrimental effects of water scarcity on agricultural output, we must gain insight into how drought stress affects these enzyme functions [10]. Plants under drought stress exhibit a number of physiological and biochemical reactions as they adjust to the shortage of water. Stomatal closure is one of the main physiological effect [7]. It minimizes water loss through transpiration but also reduces the amount of carbon dioxide that can be absorbed for photosynthesis, which lowers growth rates [4]. Drought stress can also result in dehydration of the cells, which can lower turgor pressure, hinder cell development, and eventually lower plant production. Superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POX) are among the antioxidant enzymes that effected when plants under drought stress and can cause the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [4, 7, 9]. These enzymes stop oxidative stress-induced cellular damage by scavenging ROS. The activity of osmolyte synthesis-related enzymes such as proline and glycine betaine, which support cellular osmotic balance and stabilize proteins and membranes in water-deficient environments, is similarly impacted by drought stress. All the physiological and enzymatic activities severally affected by the drought stress [7, 9, 10].

Biochar has become known as an attractive and promising tool for improving soil health and increasing crop yields, especially in the growing field of environmental science and sustainable agriculture [6]. Biochar is a kind of charcoal generated from the pyrolysis of organic materials that are used to increase plant growth and soil fertility. This is also very important for sustainable agriculture and soil management [11, 12]. Biochar affects soil enzymes, growth, and development of plants; especially in wheat is one of the most fascinating aspects of this material [6]. The enzymatic activity of the soil is essential for the breakdown of organic matter, nutrient cycling, and overall soil health. Adding biochar to soil has been found to impact this enzymatic activity in multiple ways [13, 14]. Biochar can also change the makeup of the microbial population which affects soil enzymes both directly and indirectly in addition to increasing nutrient availability and soil organic carbon stability [6]. Understanding the intricate relationship between soil enzymatic activity and biochar is essential to identifying the underlying mechanisms and improving soil conditions to support sustainable agriculture. The effect of biochar on different plant enzymatic processes, including those connected to nutrition intake, photosynthesis, and stress responses, is a topic of growing interest for scientists and experts in agriculture. They are excited to investigate the potential benefits of biochar on wheat growth and resilience, given the crucial role wheat plays in the world food chain [6, 11].

Trans-zeatin riboside (t-ZR) is a naturally occurring plant growth regulator that has emerged as a strong growth hormone used for improving plant growth under stress conditions [15]. This material is a derivative of cytokinin and is necessary for the growth and development of plants [16]. t-ZR has demonstrated promise in reducing the negative effects of stress on plants providing a useful instrument for enhancing plant health and productivity in difficult environmental circumstances. t-ZR functions as a signaling molecule that coordinates different aspects of plant growth and development by influencing these internal processes [15]. t-ZR can contribute to improved nutrient uptake, photosynthesis, and metabolic processes in the plant. It plays a role in encouraging cell elongation and division, both of which support general growth. This enhances plant resilience and productivity, especially when faced with stressors [15, 16].

Azospirillum brasilense offers unique chances to enhance soil health and agricultural productivity. Due to its role in increasing enzymatic activity such as nitrogenase, protease, phosphatase, cellulose, lipase activity within the soil ecosystem and nutrient availability for plants, especially wheat, this beneficial soil bacterium has gained recognition [15]. Enzymes are essential to the breakdown of organic materials in soil and the cycling of nutrients and These enzymatic activities are a key sign of the soil’s fertility and health because they greatly influence plant growth and development [17]. A. brasilense has demonstrated potential in increasing soil enzymatic activity by controlling the microbial community, nutrient availability, and organic matter breakdown due to its capacity to establish mutualistic relationships with plants. These effects promote improved soil quality and plant growth [15].

Our objective for this study is to highlight the potential of biochar in combination with t-ZR and A. brasilense for sustainable wheat farming in water-scarce and ecologically challenging environments. The purpose of this study was to examine how biochar acts in conjunction with t-ZR and A. brasilense and how much they can reduce the negative effects of drought stress on soil enzymatic activities in wheat plants. We hypothesized that the application of t-ZR and A. brasilense can enhcan enzamatic activities in the soil as well as in the plant. This study is essential for securing a stable and resilient future of wheat production for sustainable agriculture and food security. The use of t-ZR or A. brasilense with biochar also provided the future direction that which one is more efficient for soil fertility and to improve plant growth under drought.

Materials and methods

Plant growth conditions and experimental layout

A well-planned experiment was conducted at the agricultural research farm, Khwaja Fareed University E&IT, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan to investigate the effect of biochar with trans-zeatin riboside (tZR) and Azospirillum brasilense under drought stress conditions. Drought stress was applied at the booting stage (after 75 days of sowing) by noting applying the irrigation at the booting stage and data was collected at the anthesis stage (after 100 days of sowing). The experiment consisted of four treatments (T0: Control (C) (No drought stress, No application of biochar, t-ZR or A. brasilense), T1: Drought stress (DS), T2: DS + t-ZR with biochar, T3: DS + A. brasilense with biochar) having three replications. The plot size during this experiment was 5 × 7 ft. “Dilkash 2020” an approved variety of wheat was obtained from the Regional Agricultural Research Institute and the wheat seed was sowed on 20th November, 2022. t-ZR was obtained from the lab and applied @ 25 mg/L, as foliar spray in solution form after 75 days of sowing when drought stress was applied at the booting stage. t-ZR applied only one time during the drought stress condition on wheat crop. A. brasilense strains was collected from the GC University Lahore and was inoculated with the wheat seeds at sowing time according to the procedure reported by Fukami et al. [18]. Biochar 9000 kg/ha (pyrolysis at 700◦C) was applied before 5 days of the sowing in the soil with soil preparation according to the treatments (Table 1). All other inputs remained the same for all treatments. Average monthly temperature and humidity of the experimental area during the experiment is shown in Table 2. Four irrigations were applied as per recommendations of agriculture department, 1st on thiilering stage, 2nd on booting, 3rd on flowering and 4th on anthesis stage. Fertilizers (NPK; 120–8060 kg/ha) was also applied as per recomdadations with irrigation water. All other inputs kept same.

Table 1 Properties of biochar applied
Full size table
Table 2 Average monthly temperature and humidity during experiment at experimental area
Full size table

Recorded parameters

To record the soil and plant eyzamatic parameters, All soil and plant samples were obtained at maturity of wheat crop. Homogenate of plant tissue was prepared to determine the peroxidase activities in wheat plants combining it with a peroxidase substrate (guaiacol). By tracking the change in absorbance at a particular wavelength over time, the reaction would be observed. The peroxidase activities were noticed using a standard curve [19]. The process for measuring catalase activity entails incubating the plant extract with hydrogen peroxide and tracking how quickly the hydrogen peroxide breaks down as reported by Hadwan [20]. This was tracked by looking at changes in absorbance at a particular wavelength or the evolution of oxygen. A standard curve was created with known catalase concentrations used for calculations. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities were measured by assessing the enzyme’s ability to inhibit a reaction involving superoxide radicals. The spectrophotometric method was employed for this purpose, and commercially available assay kits were used to quantify SOD activity in wheat plants [21]. The oxidation of a phenolic substrate was used to measure polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity. A standard curve with known enzyme concentrations was used to calculate PPO activity as reported by Yokotsuka et al. [22].

The process for measuring amylase activity entails soaking the plant extract in a starch substrate and watching for the release of reducing sugars [23] and the plant extract is incubated with a protein substrate to determine protease activity [24]. Plant extracts are incubated with a lipid substrate, cellulose substrate, phenylalanine substrate and phosphate substrate, phosphate substrate under alkaline conditions to measure lipase activity, fatty acids, cellulase activity, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), acid phosphatase activity and alkaline phosphatase activity respectively. Calculations were made by using a standard curve [25,26,27,28,29]. Nitrate solution was incubated in the plant tissue to evaluate the activity of nitrate reductase, and the amount of nitrate that was converted to nitrite was then measured. The final measurement of nitrate reductase activity was expressed in micromoles per hour per gram of fresh weight, which is obtained by comparing the experimental results to a standard curve with known concentrations [30]. Soil enzymatic activities [urease (UR), dehydrogenase (DH), β-glucosidase (G), and acid phosphatase (AcP)] in the soil were noticed as per procedurereported by Tabatabai [31]. Soil organic carbon (SOC) was measured as procedure reported by Sparks et al. [32] and Dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) and carbon (DOC) were noticed as per procedure described by Smolander and Kitunen [33].

Statistical analysis

Data was collected from the three replications and arranged in MS Excel – Microsoft for the statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was done with the use of a computer software “Statistix 8.1”. Different alphabetical letters with the data present in tables and figures, shows statistical difference between each treatment.

Results

Different enzymatic activities affect differently with the application of biochar with trans-zeatin riboside (t-ZR) and biochar with Azospirillum brasilense under drought stress. Peroxidase activity and Catalase activity significantly affect all studied treatments (Figs. 1 and 2). The highest peroxidase activity (57.32 U/mg) was noticed in T0 having a control condition of no drought stress followed by T3 (57.32 U/mg) when biochar was applied with A. brasilense under drought stress and lowest peroxidase activities (56.43 U/mg) were noticed in T2 when biochar was applied with t-ZR. The highest catalase activities were noticed in T0 (132.56 µmol/min/mg) followed by T4 (113.32 µmol/min/mg) and the lowest catalase activities (93.34 µmol/min/mg) were seen in T2.

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) were significantly affected by the application of biochar with t-ZR and biochar with A. brasilense. The highest SOD activities were noticed in T0 (78.34 U/mg) under control treatment having no drought followed by T4 (68.34 U/mg) when biochar was applied with A. brasilense and the lowest SOD activities were noticed in T3 (58.34 U/mg) when biochar was applied with t-ZR (Fig. 3). The highest PPO activities were noticed in T0 (22.34 U/mg) followed by T4 (14.35 U/mg) and the lowest PPO activities were seen in T2 (12.34 U/mg) (Fig. 4).

Amylase and protease activity significantly decreased with the application of biochar with t-ZR and biochar with A. brasilense. The highest amylase activities were noticed in T0 (9.34 µmol/min/mg) followed by T1 (5.56 µmol/min/mg) and the lowest amylase activities (3.45 µmol/min/mg) were seen in T2 (Fig. 5). Highest protease activities were noticed in T0 (28.45 U/mg) under control treatments followed by T1 (21.35 U/mg) when drought stress conditions occurred having no application and lowest protease activities were noticed in T2 (17.45 U/mg) when biochar was applied with t-ZR (Fig. 6).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effect of combine application of biochar with trans-zeatin riboside and with Azospirillum brasilense on peroxidase activity (U/mg) of wheat under drought stress

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect of combine application of biochar with trans-zeatin riboside and with Azospirillum brasilense on catalase activity (µmol/min/mg) of wheat under drought stress

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of combine application of biochar with trans-zeatin riboside and with Azospirillum brasilense on superoxide dismutase (SOD) (U/mg) of wheat under drought stress

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of combine application of biochar with trans-zeatin riboside and with Azospirillum brasilense on polyphenoloxidase (PPO) activity (U/mg) of wheat under drought stress

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Effect of combine application of biochar with trans-zeatin riboside and with Azospirillum brasilense on amylase activity (µmol/min/mg) of wheat under drought stress

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Effect of combine application of biochar with trans-zeatin riboside and with Azospirillum brasilense on protease activity (U/mg) of wheat under drought stress

Full size image

Lipase activities significantly decreased with the application of biochar with t-ZR and biochar with A. brasilense of wheat under drought stress (Fig. 7). Highest lipase activities (24.54 U/mg) were noticed in T0 under control treatment followed by T1 (17.34 U/mg) when drought stress was applied and lowest lipase activities (12.54 U/mg) were seen in T2 when biochar was applied with t-ZR. The highest cellulase activities (15.45 U/mg) were noticed in T0 followed by T3 (10.34 U/mg) and the lowest cellulase activities (09.34 U/mg) were seen in T1 (Fig. 8).

Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) and nitrate reductase activities were significantly enhanced with the application of biochar with t-ZR and biochar with A. brasilense under drought stress (Figs. 9 and 10). The highest PAL (39.34 U/mg) and nitrate reductase activities (24.54 µmol/hr/g FW) were noticed in T0 under control treatment having no drought and no application followed by T3 (PAL: 30.32 U/mg, nitrate reductase: 18.34 µmol/hr/g FW) and lowest results were seen in T1 (PAL: 25.87 U/mg, nitrate reductase: 15.32 µmol/hr/g FW).

Acid phosphatase and alkaline phosphatase activities significantly improved with the application of biochar with t-ZR and biochar with A. brasilense under drought-stress conditions (Figs. 11 and 12). Highest acid phosphatase activities were noticed in T0 (17.23 U/mg) under control treatment followed by T3 (13.34 U/mg) when biochar was applied with A. brasilense under drought stress conditions and the lowest acid phosphatase activities were observed in T1 (11.34 U/mg) when drought stress was applied having no biochar application highest alkaline phosphatase activities were noticed in T0 (20.34 U/mg) followed by T2 (16.82 U/mg) and lowest alkaline phosphatase activities were seen in T1 (14.31 U/mg).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Effect of combine application of biochar with trans-zeatin riboside and with Azospirillum brasilense on lipase activity (U/mg) of wheat under drought stress

Full size image
Fig. 8
figure 8

Effect of combine application of biochar with trans-zeatin riboside and with Azospirillum brasilense on cellulase activity (U/mg) of wheat under drought stress

Full size image
Fig. 9
figure 9

Effect of combine application of biochar with trans-zeatin riboside and with Azospirillum brasilense on phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) (U/mg) of wheat under drought stress

Full size image
Fig. 10
figure 10

Effect of combine application of biochar with trans-zeatin riboside and with Azospirillum brasilense on nitrate reductase activity (µmol/hr/g FW) of wheat under drought stress

Full size image
Fig. 11
figure 11

Effect of combine application of biochar with trans-zeatin riboside and with Azospirillum brasilense on acid phosphatase activity (U/mg) of wheat under drought stress

Full size image
Fig. 12
figure 12

Effect of combine application of biochar with trans-zeatin riboside and with Azospirillum brasilense on alkaline phosphatase activity (U/mg) of wheat under drought stress

Full size image

Soil dehydrogenase (DH) and soil urease (UR) were significantly affected by the application of biochar with t-ZR and biochar with A. brasilense under drought stress (Table 3). Highest DH (68.32 nmol TPF g-1 soil h-1) and UR (23.45 µmol NH3-N g-1 h-1) activities were noticed in T0 (DH: 63.45 nmol TPF g-1 soil h-1, UR: 21.45 µmol NH3-N g-1 h-1) followed by T3 and lowest DH (57.34 nmol TPF g-1 soil h-1) and UR (17.34 µmol NH3-N g-1 h-1) was observed in T1. Soil Acid Phosphatase (AcP) and Soil β-Glucosidase (βG) significantly increased with the application of biochar with t-ZR and biochar with A. brasilense under drought stress conditions. Highest AcP (30.46 µmol p-Nitrophenol g-1 h-1) and βG (6.28 µmol p-Nitrophenol g-1 h-1) activities were noticed in T0 followed by T3 (AcP: 27.94 µmol p-Nitrophenol g-1 h-1, βG: 4.67 µmol p-Nitrophenol g-1 h-1) and lowest AcP (22.34 µmol p-Nitrophenol g-1 h-1) and βG (2.45 µmol p-Nitrophenol g-1 h-1) activities were observed in T2.

Table 3 Effect of combine application of biochar with trans-zeatin riboside and with Azospirillum brasilense on soil dehydrogenase (DH), soil urease (UR), soil acid phosphatase (AcP), soil β-Glucosidase (βG) of wheat under drought stress
Full size table

SOC (soil organic C), DOC (dissolved organic C), and DON (dissolved organic N) were significantly enhanced with the application of biochar with t-ZR and biochar with A. brasilense under drought stress conditions. Highest SOC (1.64 g kg-1), DOC (149 µg g-1) and DON (23.45 µg g-1) were noticed in T0 followed by T3 (SOC: 1.45 g kg-1, DOC: 139 µg g-1, DON: 20.32 µg g-1) and lowest SOC (1.12 g kg-1), DOC (128 µg g-1) and DON (16.56 µg g-1) were noticed in T1 (Table 4).

Table 4 Effect of combine application of biochar with trans-zeatin riboside and with Azospirillum brasilense on SOC (soil organic C), DOC (dissolved organic C), DON (dissolved organic N) of wheat under drought stress
Full size table

Discussion

Drought stress is a main abiotic stress that can reduction in wheat crop yield especially in under developing countries, Use of biochar, trans-zeatin riboside (t-ZR) and Azospirillum brasilense in crop production is very helpful to get sustainable wheat crop yield under such kind of the conditions. Applying biochar containing trans-zeatin riboside (t-ZR) and Azospirillum brasilense to wheat crops had a significant effect on peroxidase activities in wheat plants [16]. Biochar enhances the structure of the soil by boosting microbial activity, nutrient availability, and water retention in the soil [6]. A plant hormone known as t-ZR is a cytokinin that influences numerous physiological processes linked to growth and stress response. It may also have an extra impact on peroxidase activity [15]. A. brasilense increases plant growth by enhancing nutrient uptake and possibly influencing the regulation of peroxidase activity [34]. A. brasilense, t-ZR, and biochar application boost peroxidase activity under drought stress [15]. The combined actions of A. brasilense and biochar produced a favorable microbiological environment that supported plant physiological processes during drought stress, which is why the applied treatment boosted peroxidase activity. Because each treatment has a different method of action and affects enzyme activities under drought stress, the control plants showed higher peroxidase activity than the biochar + t-ZR and biochar + Azospirillum-treated plants. Plant growth under stress is impacted by t-ZR, whereas soil water retention and microbial activity are enhanced by biochar. Working together, A. brasilense may also help plants become more drought-tolerant; this tactic may increase wheat’s peroxidase levels and fortify the plant’s defenses against stress brought on by drought [35]. Zaheer et al. [6] reported that biochar increases soil water retention and microbiological activity. Plants that are under stress may benefit from the cytokinin t-ZR [15]. Ali et al. [35] reported that A. brasilense enhances nutrient availability and fosters plant development. The two vital enzymes that scavenge reactive oxygen species (ROS), superoxide dismutase and catalase are impacted by the combination of these elements [36]. The cooperative effect may increase antioxidant enzyme activity, enhancing the wheat plant’s resistance to oxidative stress caused by dryness [37]. Regarding a number of relevant studies, the findings derived from the research on Carex duriuscula by Hou et al. [38], wheat plants under stress by Caverzan et al. [39], bread wheat by Qayyum et al. [40], and drought-exposed wheat cultivars by Huseynova [41] provide important new understandings of the mechanisms underlying plant enzymatic responses and drought tolerance. All of these studies point to the importance of gaseous exchange, osmotic adjustment, osmolyte synthesis, and antioxidant enzyme activity in improving plant resistance to water stress. Our study supports these results by showing how biochar, t-ZR, and A. brasilense work together to enhance enzyme activities in water-stressed wheat plants, including peroxidase, catalase, superoxide dismutase, polyphenol oxidase, and amylase. This emphasizes the significance of novel methods like biochar and microbial inoculants in mitigating the negative impacts of water stress.

Significant effects on important physiological processes and enzymatic activity are observed in wheat when biochar, t-ZR, and A. brasilense are applied, particularly when drought stress is present [15]. Biochar enhances soil structure and microbial activities which is very helpful for a suitable environment for plant growth. Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) expression is frequently altered by microbial interactions, so biochar affects PPO activities. Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) is an essential enzyme in the plant’s defense mechanism against abiotic stress and its production is improved with the application of biochar and A. brasilense [42]. t-ZR is associated with several physiological processes, including cell division and differentiation, which impact the activity of the enzyme amylase and are involved in starch metabolism [15]. Enzymatic activities that are essential for metabolic processes are impacted when wheat grows using biochar containing t-ZR and biochar containing A. brasilense during drought [43]. By altering the microbial communities in the soil and the availability of nutrients, biochar may affect the activities of lipase, cellulase, and proteases [44]. It’s possible that t-ZR can regulate these enzymatic activities because of its function in plant growth and stress responses [15]. The growth-promoting bacteria A. brasilense for plants increases the availability of nutrients, which in turn influences the activities of lipase, protease, and cellulose enzymes crucial for nutrient uptake and cell wall modification [45].

Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) and nitrate reductase activities significantly increased in response to both biochar compositions, showing a favorable response to the mitigation of drought stress [6]. Addition of the biochar in the soil can enhance the soil’s ability to retain moisture and release nutrients that directly improve the plant metabolic processes [42]. The observed increase in PAL and nitrate reductase activities are most likely the result of the combined effects of t-ZR and A. brasilense, which are known to stimulate plant growth and metabolic pathways [15]. When biochar was applied having no drought stress in wheat PAL and nitrate reductase activities can increase. This bolsters the hypothesis that plants react physiologically to drought and other stressors and that using biochar can mitigate those effects [46]. The lowest levels of PAL and nitrate reductase activities were observed where drought stress was applied without the use of biochar supplementation. This result highlights the critical role that biochar plays in enhancing plant stress tolerance. Activities of alkaline phosphatase and acid phosphatase can increased with the application of biochar as it can increase the soil fertility, organic matter, and physiological processes of the plant that directly increase the photosynthates and growth hormones in the plant [47]. Duff et al. [48] reported that the acid phosphatase is associated with the mobilization of phosphorus, whereas alkaline phosphatase facilitates the uptake of nutrients. The increase in these enzyme activities suggests that the biochar amendments may have contributed to the improved nutrient availability in the root zone [49].

Significant increases in soil dehydrogenase and urease activities have been noticed by biochar and A. brasilense that shows the biochar efficacy in enhancing these enzyme functions in drought-stressed wheat-growing soil [4, 6]. Biochar that contained t-ZR exhibited decreased activity for both enzymes, indicating that in similar conditions, it might not have as much of an impact on urease and dehydrogenase [50]. The application of both biochar formulations significantly increased soil β-glucosidase (βG) and soil acid phosphatase (AcP) activities under drought stress conditions [6]. The control treatment showed the highest activities for AcP and βG indicating that the absence of biochar supplementation resulted in the most notable increase in these enzyme activities. Zaheer et al. [6] reported that the biochar infused with A. brasilense exhibited noteworthy activity for both AcP and βG, indicating its potential utility in augmenting these soil enzymatic processes. Reduced activities for AcP and βG were observed in biochar containing t-ZR [49], suggesting that drought stress may not have as much of an impact on these enzyme activities. Biochar with A. brasilense and Biochar with t-ZR both have a positive effect on soil properties especially for the SOC, DOC, and DON. Dong et al. [51, 52] reported similar findings with the application of biochar. SOC promotion is necessary to maintain soil fertility and structure [4]. Both biochar infused with t-ZR and biochar infused with A. brasilense support this attribute. The dissolved organic carbon (DOC) levels analysis demonstrates the advantageous effects of both biochar formulations. Elevated DOC levels can be used as a marker for increased microbial activity, the decomposition of organic matter, and the availability of nutrients. Biochar containing t-ZR and biochar containing A. brasilense are both effective in fostering a favorable environment for DOC [37] although the specific mechanisms enhancing dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in the soil may differ. Dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) shows that both biochar formulations have a positive effect on the nitrogen dynamics in the soil. An indication of better plant nutrient availability is elevated DON levels. Their respective efficacies show that biochar containing t-ZR and biochar containing A. brasilense can both increase the amount of dissolved organic nitrogen in soil used for growing wheat during drought stress [6, 53].

Conclusion

Drought stress significantly damaged the enzymatic activities of wheat plants and soil properties. Biochar with trans-Zeatin Riboside and with Azospirillum brasilense both are very effective for plant growth promotion and to increase enzymatic activities under drought stress conditions. The most promising combination for mitigating the detrimental effects of drought stress on enzymatic activity was A. brasilense with biochar. A. brasilense and biochar can enhance the enzymatic and soil structure which may be helpful for water-scarce environments that are very effective for sustainable agriculture. So it is recommended to for the farmers to use the A. brasilense with biochar to improve wheat growth especially under drought stress condition.

Data availability

Data is provided within the manuscript or supplementary information files.

References

  1. Huang H, Huang J, Wu Y, Zhuo W, Song J, Li X, et al. The Improved Winter Wheat Yield Estimation by assimilating GLASS LAI into a Crop Growth Model with the proposed bayesian posterior-based ensemble Kalman Filter. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2023;61:4401818. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2023.3259742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Du K, Huang J, Wang W, Zeng Y, Li X et al. Monitoring low-temperature stress in Winter Wheat using TROPOMI Solar-Induced Chlorophyll fluorescence. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 224;62:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2024.3351141.

  3. Song M, Zhou S, Hu N, Li J, Huang Y, Zhang J, et al. Exogenous strigolactones alleviate drought stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by promoting cell wall biogenesis to optimize root architecture. Physiol Biochem. 2023;204:108121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.108121.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zaheer MS, Raza MAS, Saleem MF, Erinle KO, Iqbal R, Ahmad S. Effect of rhizobacteria and cytokinins application on wheat growth and yield under normal vs drought conditions. Commun Soil Sci Plan Anal. 2019;50:2521–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2019.1667376.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hu H, Jia Y, Hao Z, Ma G, Xie Y, Wang C, Ma D. Lipidomics-based insights into the physiological mechanism of wheat in response to heat stress. Physiol Biochem. 2023;205:108190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.108190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zaheer MS, Ali HH, Soufan W, Iqbal R, Habib-ur-Rahman M, Iqbal J, Israr M, Sabagh EL. Potential effects of biochar application for improving wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth and soil biochemical properties under drought stress conditions. Land. 2021;10:1125. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10111125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yi J, Li H, Zhao Y, Shao M, Zhang H, et al. Assessing soil water balance to optimize irrigation schedules of flood-irrigated maize fields with different cultivation histories in the arid region. Agric Water Manag. 2022;265:107543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Qiu S, Yang H, Zhang S, Huang S, Zhao S, Xu X, et al. Carbon storage in an arable soil combining field measurements, aggregate turnover modeling and climate scenarios. CATENA. 2023;220:106708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2022.106708.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang Y, Liu H, Wu J, Zhang S, Gao C, Zhang S, Tang DWS. Soil enzyme activities, soil physical properties, photosynthetic physical characteristics and water use of winter wheat after long-term straw mulch and organic fertilizer application. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1186376. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1186376.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Seleiman MF, Al-Suhaibani N, Ali N, Akmal M, Alotaibi M, Refay Y, Dindaroglu T, Abdul-Wajid HH, Battaglia ML. Drought stress impacts on plants and different approaches to alleviate its adverse effects. Volume 10. Plants; 2021. p. 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020259.

  11. Jia Q, Sun J, Gan Q, Shi N, Fu S. Zea mays cultivation, biochar, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculation influenced lead immobilization. Microbiol Spectr. 2024;23:e0342723. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.03427-23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guan H, Huang J, Li L, Li X, Miao S, Su W, et al. Improved gaussian mixture model to map the flooded crops of VV and VH polarization data. Remote Sens Environ. 2023;295:113714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. He M, Ren T, Jin ZD, Deng L, Liu H, Cheng YY, et al. Precise analysis of potassium isotopic composition in plant materials by multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Spectrochim Acta Part B Spectrosc. 2023;209:106781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2023.106781.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu J, He T, Yang Z, Peng S, Zhu Y, Li H, et al. Insight into the mechanism of nano-TiO2-doped biochar in mitigating cadmium mobility in soil-pak choi system. Sci Total Environ. 2024;916:169996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.169996.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zaheer MS, Ali HH, Erinle KO, Wani SH, Okon OG, Nadeem MA, Nawaz M, Bodlah MA, Waqas MM, Iqbal J, Raza A. Inoculation of Azospirillum brasilense and exogenous application of trans-zeatin riboside alleviates arsenic induced physiological damages in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29:33909–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18106-w.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sellami K, Couvert A, Nasrallah N, Maachi R, Abouseoud M, Amrane A. Peroxidase enzymes as green catalysts for bioremediation and biotechnological applications: a review. Sci Total Environ. 2022;806:150500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Neemisha SS. Soil enzymes and their role in Nutrient Cycling. In: Giri B, Kapoor R, Wu QS, Varma A, editors. Structure and functions of Pedosphere. Singapore: Springer; 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8770-9_8.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Fukami J, Nogueira MA, Araujo RS, Hungria M. Accessing inoculation methods of maize and wheat with Azospirillum brasilense. AMB Express. 2016;6:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-015-0171-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Singh H, Dixit S, Singh P, Verma PC. Differential peroxidase activities in three different crops upon insect feeding. Plant Signal Behav. 2013;8:e25615. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.25615.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hadwan MH. Simple spectrophotometric assay for measuring catalase activity in biological tissues. BMC Biochem. 2018;19:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12858-018-0097-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Eyidoĝan F, Öktem HA, Yücel M. Superoxide dismutase activity of Hexaploid and tetraploid wheat Cultivars Subjected to heat and chilling stress. Cereal Res Commun. 2003;31:387–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03543369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yokotsuka K, Shimizu T, Shimizu T. Polyphenoloxidase from six mature grape varieties and their activities towards various phenols. J Ferment Bioeng. 1991;71:156–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0922-338x(91)90102-m.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rice EW. Improved Spectrophotometric determination of Amylase with a new stable starch substrate solution. Clin Chem. 1959;5:592–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/5.6.592.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Banik S, Biswas S, Karmakar S. Extraction, purification, and activity of protease from the leaves of Moringa oleifera. F1000Research. 2018;7:1151. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15642.1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Zienkiewicz A, Rejón JD, Zienkiewicz K, Castro AJ, Rodríguez-García MI. In gel detection of lipase activity in crude plant extracts (Olea europaea). Bio-protocol. 2015;5:e1444. https://doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.1444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Worsfold PJ, Whiteside IRC, Pfeiffer HF, Waldhoff H. An automated spectrophotometric flow-injection procedure for the determination of cellulase activity in bioreactor preparations. J Biotechnol. 1990;14:81–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1656(90)90020-c.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Goldson A, Lam M, Scaman CH, Clemens S, Kermode A. Screening of phenylalanine ammonia lyase in plant tissues, and retention of activity during dehydration. J Sci Food Agr. 2008;88:619–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Luchter-Wasylewska E. Continuous assay for acid phosphatase using 1-naphthyl phosphate as a substrate. Acta Biochim Pol. 1997;44:853–60. https://doi.org/10.18388/abp.1997_4391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fernandez DS, Ascencio J. Acid phosphatase activity in bean and cowpea plants grown under phosphorus stress. J Plant Nutr. 1994;17:229–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904169409364723.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Jaworski EG. Nitrate reductase assay in intact plant tissues. Biochem Bioph Res Co. 1971;43:1274–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-291x(71)80010-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tabatabai MA. Soil enzymes. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Microbiological and Biochemical Properties; Weaver RW, Angle S, Bottomley P, Bezdicek D, Smith S, Tabatabai A, Wollum A, Eds.; SSSA: Madison, ME, USA, 1994; pp. 775–833.

  32. Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH, Soltanpour PN, Tabatabai MA, Johnston CT, Sumner ME. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3, Chemical Methods; SSSA: Madison, ME, USA, 1996.

  33. Smolander A, Kitunen V. Soil microbial activities and characteristics of dissolved organic C and N in relation to tree species. Soil Biol Biochem. 2002;34:651–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhao H, Sun N, Huang L, Qian R, Lin X, Sun C, Zhu Y. Azospirillum brasilense activates peroxidase-mediated cell wall modification to inhibit root cell elongation. iScience. 2023;26:107144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107144.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Ali HH, Ilyas M, Zaheer MS, Hameed A, Ikram K, Khan WD, Iqbal R, Awan TH, Rizwan M, Mustafa AEMA, Elshikh MS. Alleviation of chromium toxicity in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) using salicylic acid and Azospirillum brasilense. BMC Plant Biol. 2023;23:535. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04528-w.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Samanta S, Seth CS, Roychoudhury A. The molecular paradigm of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) with different phytohormone signaling pathways during drought stress in plants. Physiol Biochem. 2024;206:108259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.108259.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ighodaro OM, Akinloye OA. First line defence antioxidants-superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPX): their fundamental role in the entire antioxidant defence grid. Alexandria J Med. 2018;54:287–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajme.2017.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hou P, Wang F, Luo B, Li A, Wang C, Shabala L, Ahmed HAI, Deng S, Zhang H, Song P, et al. Antioxidant enzymatic activity and osmotic Adjustment as Components of the Drought Tolerance mechanism in Carex duriuscula. Plants. 2021;10:436. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10030436.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Caverzan A, Casassola A, Brammer SP. Antioxidant responses of wheat plants under stress. Genet Mol Biol. 2016;39:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2015-0109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Qayyum A, Al Ayoubi S, Sher A, Bibi Y, Ahmad S, Shen Z, Jenks MA. Improvement in drought tolerance in bread wheat is related to an improvement in osmolyte production, antioxidant enzyme activities, and gaseous exchange. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021;28:5238–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.05.040.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Huseynova IM. Photosynthetic characteristics and enzymatic antioxidant capacity of leaves from wheat cultivars exposed to drought. Biochimica et biophysica acta, 212; 8:1516-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.02.037.

  42. Zhu X, Chen B, Zhu L, Xing B. Effects and mechanisms of biochar-microbe interactions in soil improvement and pollution remediation: a review. Environ Pollut. 2017;227:98–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.032.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Alhammad BA, Zaheer MS, Ali HH, Hameed A, Ghanem KZ, Seleiman MF. Effect of Co-application of Azospirillum brasilense and Rhizobium pisi on wheat performance and soil nutrient status under deficit and partial Root drying stress. Plants. 2023;12:3141. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12173141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Liao X, Kang H, Haidar G, Wang W, Malghani S. The impact of biochar on the activities of soil nutrients acquisition enzymes is potentially controlled by the pyrolysis temperature: a meta-analysis. Geoderma. 2022;411:115692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115692.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Hou X, McMillan M, Coumans JVF, Poljak A, Raftery MJ, Pereg L. Cellular responses during Morphological Transformation in Azospirillum brasilense and its flcA knockout mutant. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e114435. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114435.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Haider I, Raza MAS, Iqbal R, Aslam MU, Habib-ur-Rahman M, Raja S, et al. Potential effects of biochar application on mitigating the drought stress implications on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under various growth stages. J Saudi Chem Soc. 2020;24:974–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2020.10.005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Ma H, Egamberdieva D, Wirth S, Li Q, Omari RA, Hou M, Bellingrath-Kimura SD. Effect of Biochar and Irrigation on the interrelationships among soybean growth, Root Nodulation, Plant P Uptake, and soil nutrients in a Sandy Field. Sustainability. 2019;11:6542. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236542.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Duff SMG, Sarath G, Plaxton WC. The role of acid phosphatases in plant phosphorus metabolism. Physiol Plant. 1994;90:791–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1994.tb02539.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Liu G, Wang H, Yan G, Wang M, Jiang S, Wang X, et al. Soil enzyme activities and microbial nutrient limitation during the secondary succession of boreal forests. CATENA. 2023;230:107268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2023.107268.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. García-Fortea E, Lluch-Ruiz A, Pineda-Chaza BJ, et al. A highly efficient organogenesis protocol based on zeatin riboside for in vitro regeneration of eggplant. BMC Plant Biol. 2020;20:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-2215-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Nguyen HN, Nguyen TQ, Kisiala AB, Emery RJN. Beyond transport: cytokinin ribosides are translocated and active in regulating the development and environmental responses of plants. Planta. 2021;254:45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-021-03693-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Dong L, Yang X, Shi L, Shen Y, Wang L, Wang J, et al. Biochar and nitrogen fertilizer co-application changed SOC content and fraction composition in Huang-Huai-Hai plain, China. Chemosphere. 2022;291:132925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132925.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhao Y, Wang H, Song B, Xue P, Zhang W, Peth S, et al. Characterizing uncertainty in process-based hydraulic modeling, exemplified in a semiarid Inner Mongolia steppe. Geoderma. 2023;440:116713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Researchers Supporting Project for funding this work through Researchers Supporting Project number (RSPD2024R708), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

Researchers Supporting Project Number (RSPD2024R708), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agricultural Engineering, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan

    Muhammad Saqlain Zaheer, Kamran Ikram & Yasir Niaz

  2. Department of Plant Nutrition, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES), University of Bonn, 53115, Bonn, Germany

    Muhammad Rizwan

  3. School of Biomedical Science, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan, China

    Nazish Aijaz

  4. MOA Key Laboratory of Soil Microbiology, Rhizobium Research Center, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China

    Nazish Aijaz

  5. Institute of Plant Protection, MNS University of Agriculture, Multan, 61000, Pakistan

    Akhtar Hameed, Hafiz M. Usman Aslam, Nadeem Ahmed & Rani Bibi

  6. Department of Agriculture, Government College University, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan

    Hafiz Haider Ali

  7. Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA

    Hafiz Haider Ali

  8. Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia

    Salim Manoharadas

  9. State Key Laboratory of Wheat Breeding, Group of Wheat Quality and Molecular Breeding, College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an, Shandong, 271000, China

    Muhammad Waheed Riaz

  10. Department of Plant Science, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, P.R. China

    Muhammad Aamir Manzoor

  11. National Key Laboratory of Wheat Improvement, Peking University Institute of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Weifang, 261325, China

    Shamsur Rehman

  12. Department of Plant Pathology, San Luis Valley Research Center, Colorado State University, Colorado, USA

    Hafiz M. Usman Aslam

Authors
  1. Muhammad Saqlain Zaheer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Muhammad Rizwan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nazish Aijaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Akhtar Hameed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kamran Ikram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hafiz Haider Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yasir Niaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hafiz M. Usman Aslam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Salim Manoharadas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Muhammad Waheed Riaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Nadeem Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Rani Bibi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Muhammad Aamir Manzoor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Shamsur Rehman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.S.Z. and H.H.A. conceived the ideas; S.M. and A.H. designed the methodology; M.R., R.B. and MAM collected and analyzed the data; M.S.Z., Y.N. and K.I. wrote the manuscript; N. Aijaz., S.R. and M.W.R. revised the manuscript; N. Ahmed., H.M.U.A. and N. Aijaz. provided financial support. All authors contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Muhammad Saqlain Zaheer, Muhammad Rizwan or Salim Manoharadas.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

An approved “Dilkash 2020” variety seed of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were obtained from the Regional Agriculture Research Institute Bahawalpur (RARI) for research. All local, national or international guidelines and legislation were adhered to for the use of plants in this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

During the preparation of this manuscript the author(s) used Chat GPT and Grammarly in order to improve the technical and English language of the paper. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take(s) full responsibility for the content of the publication.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zaheer, M.S., Rizwan, M., Aijaz, N. et al. Investigating the synergistic effects of biochar, trans-zeatin riboside, and Azospirillum brasilense on soil improvement and enzymatic activity in water-stressed wheat. BMC Plant Biol 24, 314 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05038-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05038-z

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us