Skip to main content
Download PDF

OsCIPK2 mediated rice root microorganisms and metabolites to improve plant nitrogen uptake

BMC Plant Biology volume 24, Article number: 285 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Crop roots are colonized by large numbers of microorganisms, collectively known as the root-microbiome, which modulate plant growth, development and contribute to elemental nutrient uptake. In conditions of nitrogen limitation, the over-expressed Calcineurin B-like interacting protein kinase 2 (OsCIPK2) gene with root-specific promoter (RC) has been shown to enhance growth and nitrogen uptake in rice. Analysis of root-associated bacteria through high-throughput sequencing revealed that OsCIPK2 has a significant impact on the diversity of the root microbial community under low nitrogen stress. The quantification of nifH gene expression demonstrated a significant enhancement in nitrogen-fixing capabilities in the roots of RC transgenetic rice. Synthetic microbial communities (SynCom) consisting of six nitrogen-fixing bacterial strains were observed to be enriched in the roots of RC, leading to a substantial improvement in rice growth and nitrogen uptake in nitrogen-deficient soils. Forty and twenty-three metabolites exhibiting differential abundance were identified in the roots and rhizosphere soils of RC transgenic rice compared to wild-type (WT) rice. These findings suggest that OSCIPK2 plays a role in restructuring the microbial community in the roots through the regulation of metabolite synthesis and secretion. Further experiments involving the exogenous addition of citric acid revealed that an optimal concentration of this compound facilitated the growth of nitrogen-fixing bacteria and substantially augmented their population in the soil, highlighting the importance of citric acid in promoting nitrogen fixation under conditions of low nitrogen availability. These findings suggest that OsCIPK2 plays a role in enhancing nitrogen uptake by rice plants from the soil by influencing the assembly of root microbial communities, thereby offering valuable insights for enhancing nitrogen utilization in rice cultivation.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

To ensure food security for the growing population, agricultural systems must produce crops that are environmentally friendly [1]. Soil rhizomicrobiomes promote plant growth and health, making them important to dealing with this challenge [2,3,4]. Plant-associated microbiota colonize diverse tissue types and root surfaces to facilitate access to soil nutrients [5]. The structure of microbial communities is significantly influenced by both plant genotypes and environmental factors [6, 7]. In response to biotic or abiotic stress, plants secrete chemical factors to help them adapt to these stresses by recruiting beneficial microorganisms, which is known as the “cry for help” strategy [5, 8]. Crop roots are colonized by large numbers of microorganisms, collectively known as the root-microbiome, which modulate plant growth as well as development and contribute to plant fitness under diverse environmental conditions [9, 10]. Roots also secret organic acids, amino acids, and sugars, which provide microorganisms in the rhizosphere with rich nutrients, enabling microbiota to migrate into the rhizosphere and roots [11]. Apart from nutrient uptake, the root-microbiome promotes plant growth and development by modulating plant hormone homeostasis, improving resilience to abiotic stresses, or protecting the host from pathogens [12, 13].

The growth and development of crops heavily rely on availability of nutrients that the root system can access, implying that crops have to overcome many challenges in extracting nutrients for cellular functions, and any lack of nutrients may decrease productivity [14, 15]. To enhance their defense abilities against nutrient deprivation, crop species recruit microbes from soil by regulating their nutrient uptake genes [16, 17]. For example, the maize rum1 gene is an important checkpoint for auxin-mediated initiation of lateral and seminal roots, which regulates auxin transport in primary roots as well as auxin perception in primary root pericytes and influences lateral root development [18]. Mutant rum1 lacks lateral roots, which reduces water and nutrient acquisition during early development. Compared with wild-type maize, bacterial diversity in the mutant rum1 rhizosphere was found to be significantly reduced during root development [19]. These results show that the rhizosphere’s microbial composition may be influenced by root development-related genes through a number of signaling substances that control lateral root’ length and number.

China accounts for about 20% of the world’s rice planting area, and consumes nearly 40% of the total nitrogen fertilizer used globally [20]. In the last 30 years, nitrogenous fertilizer consumption in China has increased 3.28-fold; however, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) is about 30–35%, which is less than the global average value (40–60%) [21, 22]. Plants take up nitrogen through their roots as nitrates (NO3−) and ammonia (NH4+), which they actively use in their metabolic processes. Various NUE-related genes have been identified, providing valuable information for screening or molecular breeding of high-NUE rice cultivars, such as Nitrate Transporter 1(NRT1), DENSE AND ERECT PANICLE 1(DEP1), NUE-related transcription factor 42 (NAC42) and Glutamine synthetase1.1 (GS1.1) [23,24,25]. Recently, more and more research showed that Calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs) and CBL-interacting proteinkinases (CIPKs) play an important role in nitrogen uptake and root development. For example, the CmCIPK23, a CIPK from Chrysanthemum, regulates CmTGA1 and activates nitrogen uptake during root development [26]. In plants, CBL and CIPK proteins form one of the important Ca2+ decoding complexes to decipher Ca2+ signals elicited by environmental challenges, such as nitrogen-limiting stress [27, 28]. When Arabidopsis plants are subjected to low NO3- concentrations, CBL9-CIPK23 complexes can phosphorylate the Thr101 site of CHL1, the earliest identified nitrate transporter in plants, enhancing NO3- uptake by plants [29]. Meanwhile, CIPK23 regulates NH4+ uptake by phospho-regulating AMT1, a high-affinity NH4+ transporter [30]. Moreover, CIPK8 positively regulates early nitrate signaling in Arabidopsis [31]. In a previous study under nitrogen-limiting conditions, we also found that OSCIPK2-overexpressing transgenic rice plants with root specific promoter (RC) increased rice yields by 35% and nitrogen uptake by 38.51%, compared to wild type (WT) rice [32].

Recent research has demonstrated that plant NUE-related genes play a crucial role in modulating nitrogen uptake and transport by influencing the root microbial community. For instance, NRT1.1B facilitates the colonization of rice roots by nitrogen cycle bacteria and promotes the conversion of organic nitrogen [33]. Endophytes microbes (e.g. root microbiomes) are ubiquitous in plant species and may originate from the soil, colonizing plants internally after successful interaction in the rhizosphere. These endophytes provide various benefits to plants, including increased nutrient uptake by roots, enhanced defense mechanisms, stress alleviation and modulation of plant development [34]. Recently study showed that Ca2+ signals play a key role in beneficial plant-microbe associations, such as in rhizobia-legume symbiosis [35] and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) growth [36]. In a study by Bao et al., it was found that the use of a calcium-based fertilizer led to a significant increase in the colonization rate of maize roots by AMF, with rates improving by up to 40% [37]. Given the significance of the CIPK family in mediating Ca2+ signaling, we propose that the overexpression of OSCIPK2 in rice roots may enhance root colonization by specific microbial species, thereby promoting nitrogen uptake under nitrogen-deficient conditions.

This study utilized 16 S rRNA high-throughput sequencing to investigate the impact of genetic variations on the composition of root-associated microbial communities in nitrogen-limited soil conditions. The predominant bacterial strains enriched in RC roots were isolated and their functions validated using the SynCom system. Subsequently, metabolomics analyses of both root and rhizosphere soils were performed to identify the key metabolites influencing the formation of root-associated microbiomes. Our findings are conducive for reducing the amount of applied nitrogen fertilizers and increasing rice productivity as well as nutrient uptake.

Materials and methods

The present study uses OSCIPK2-overexpressing transgenic rice plants to investigate how plant genes and root-associated microbes affect nitrogen uptake. Field and pot experiments were conducted under different nitrogen levels to analyze genetic variations in root microbiomes.

Plant materials and growth conditions

The experiment was performed in the experimental farm (26°08′ N,119°28′ E) of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China during the rice growing season of 2018–2019. The OSCIPK2-overexpressing transgenic rice plant with root specific promoter (RC), which exhibits high nitrogen uptake efficiency [32], and its corresponding wild type (WT) were used as experimental materials. The WT cultivar Kitaake were obtained from the International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines. At room temperature, rice seeds were soaked in water for 24 h at room temperature and germinated under moist conditions at 37℃ for 48 h. Germinated seeds were grown in paddy fields. After the 21-day germination period, seedlings were transplanted in a filed at a spacing of 0.15 × 0.15 m and one seedling per hill. Four nitrogen fertilizer levels were set (0 kg·ha− 1, 75 kg·ha− 1, 150 kg·ha− 1 and 225 kg·ha− 1), using urea as the nitrogen fertilizer. Phosphorus was applied as the base fertilizer and potassium for top dressing at rates of 112.5 kg ha− 1 (P2O5) and 180 kg ha− 1 (K2O), respectively. Soil textures included sandy loam, tillage layer with 2.33 g·kg− 1 total nitrogen, 196.2 mg·kg− 1 available nitrogen; 1.12 g·kg− 1 total phosphorus; 139.5 mg·kg− 1 available potassium; 1.05 g·kg− 1 total potassium; 135.09 mg·kg− 1 available phosphorus and 30.64 g·kg− 1 soil organic matter. In the soil pot experiment, five seedlings of RC and WT were transplanted in plastic buckets containing 12 kg soil. The RC and WT were separated by vertical plastic sheets in plastic buckets. The soils used in the pot experiment were consistent with those of the field experiment. No nitrogen fertilizer (0 kg·ha− 1) was applied during the whole growth season in the pot experiment. The amount of phosphorus and potassium fertilizer were converted according to the field experiment. The soil pot experiments were performed in a greenhouse at natural temperature and light from May 2019 to September 2019. Twenty pots were used in this experiment.

Determination of physiological parameters and grain yields

To determine nitrogen levels and grain yields in the field experiment, 10 rice plants were dried to a constant weight and sampled three times for each sample. Yield components, including the number of spikelets per panicle, effective panicles, seed setting rate and 1000 grain weight were also determined. Rice samples in the soil pot were collected during heading and maturing stages. At the heading stage, total nitrogen levels, shoot lengths, total dry mass and chlorophyll levels of leaf were measured. The semi-micro Kjeldahl method was used to determine nitrogen and protein levels. To measure the chlorophyll levels, readings of flag leaves were measured using SPAD (soil–plant analyses development) 502 chlorophyll meter at 11:00–12:00 a.m.

DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing

Rice roots from the pot were obtained for bacterial 16sRNA gene profiling. Root sampling was performed at the heading stage and washed until there were no visible soil particles. Next, 10 cm long roots from the ground were sliced into 2 mm sections and placed in a 2-ml tube. Three replicates were performed for each sample. Total DNA extraction from root bacteria was performed using the BioFast soil Genomic DNA Extraction kit (BioFlux, Hangzhou, China), as instructed by the manufacturer. Total DNA from root bacteria were detected by 1% agarose electrophoresis and their concentrations determined by the NanoDrop 2000 nucleic acid analyzer (Thermo Scientific, USA). The V5-V7 region of bacterial 16 S ribosomal RNA gene was amplified using 799 F (AACMGGATTAGATACCCKG) and 1193R (ACGTCATCCCCACCTTCC) primers. The PCR assay was performed using Trans Start Fastpfu DNA Polymerase (TransGen Biotech, China). After amplification, PCR products were identified by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gel and recovered using the AxyPrepDNA Gel Recovery Kit (Axygen Bioscience, China) after elution using Tris-HCl. The library was sequenced on a HiSeq 2500 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).

Processing of high-throughput sequencing data

Raw data were first screened after which sequences were removed from consideration if they were shorter than 230 bp, had a low quality score (≤ 20), contained ambiguous bases or did not exactly match primer sequences as well as barcode tags, and separated using sample-specific barcode sequences. Reads were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using the Vsearch’s Uparse algorithm (v2.7.1) at a similarity level of 97% [38]. All sequences were analyzed against the GenBank non-redundant nucleotide (nt) database using the BLAST tool.

The OTU information was used to generate rarefaction curves and to calculate the richness as well as diversity indices. α- andβ- diversities were analyzed using Mothur (v1.31.2) [39] and QIIME (v1.8.0) [40]. Heatmaps were generated using Mothur (version 1.31.2) to compare bacterial community membership and structures among samples [41]. To assess the similarity between RC and WT, clustering analyses and PCA were performed by R (v3.6.0) based on OTU information from RC and WT [42].

Quantitative PCR analysis

A quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) assay was performed using the Mastercycler ep realplex (Eppendorf, Germany) to determine the abundance of nirH genes and the specifically root-associated bacterial strains. The nirH was quantified with the primers (forward: 5’-CCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3’; reverse: 5’- ATTACCGCGGCTGCTGGCA-3’). The specifically root-associated bacterial strains were quantified using the primers shown in Table S1. The abundances of nifH and specifically root-associated bacterial strains in roots were quantified relative to a standard curve for plasmids containing the target gene or bacterial strains sequence inserts. qPCR was performed in a 15 µl reaction mixture containing 7.5 µl 2×q-PCR mastermix (DBI Bioscience, Germany), 0.6 µl of each primer (10 µ M) and 1 µl of template DNA (20 ng of total root or soil DNA or a serial dilution of plasmid DNA for standard curves). Four independent qPCR assays were performed for each sample.

Determination of the effects of root-associated bacteria on plant growth

SynCom were designed to evaluate the effects of specific bacteria enrichment in RC roots. Six root-associated bacterial strains (Phenylobacterium sp., Rhizobium sp., Pleomorphomonas sp., Devosia sp., Sphingomonas sp. and Azospirillum sp.), were purchased from the Agricultural Culture Collection of China (ACCC, http://www.accc.org.cn/), and used to design a SynCom. The signal bacterial strain was cultivated in 50 ml tubes TSB medium at 28 °C and grown to OD 600 nm = 1. Bacterial cells were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in deionized water. The SynCom was created by inoculating six prepared bacterial suspensions in equal volumes, followed by adjusting them to an OD600 of 0.5 using deionized water. In the pot experiments, 40 ml of the SynComs suspensions was inoculated into the 250 g of native or sterile soil. The seeds of WT or RC transgenics rice were disinfected using 30% H2O2 for 30 min, rinsed 3–5 times using deionized water and placed in a dark incubator at 30 °C for 48 h to germinate. Coleoptiles of germinated seeds were placed in styrofoam and hydroponically cultured for 14 days. Then, 14-day old seedlings were transplanted into sterile and native soils, respectively. Native soils were the same as those used in the pot experiment. Sterilized soil was prepared by autoclaving. Plants were grown in an acclimatized room at 32/25°C day/night, 16 h light and 35% humidity. After 2 weeks, shoot lengths, total dry mass, leaf SPAD values and total nitrogen content for plants were measured.

Metabolite fingerprinting analysis of root and rhizosphere soil

The roots selected for metabolite analyses were the same as root samples used for bacterial 16sRNA gene profiling. Freeze-dried roots were crushed for 1.5 min using a zirconia bead in a mixer mill (MM 400, Retsch). Then, 100 mg of the powder was weighted and extracted overnight at 4℃ using 0.6 ml of 70% aqueous methanol. After centrifugation at 10, 000 g for 10 min, extracts were passed through the SPE Cartridge (250 mg, 3 ml; CNW, ANPEL, Shanghai, China) and filtered via micro-pores (0.22 μm pore sizes; ANPEL, Shanghai, China) before UPLC-MS/MS analysis. Root metabolites were assayed by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC, Shim-pack UFLC SHIMADZU CBM30A, Japan) coupled with Tandem mass spectrometry (Applied Biosystems 4500 QTRAP, USA). Root metabolites were determined as shown in Text S1. A widely targeted metabolomic method was used to profile root metabolites using the self-built MWDB database (Metware biotechnology Co., Ltd. Wuhan, China, http://www.metware.cn/). Secondary spectrum information was used to qualitatively analyze the metabolites. Further, triple quadruple-bar mass spectrometry was used for metabolite quantification.

In order to determine the metabolites released from roots, the metabolomes of rhizosphere soils from RC and WT were examined. The rhizosphere represents a key site for plant-microbe interactions within the soil. The composition of rhizosphere soil metabolites is intricate, encompassing root exudates, microbial metabolites, and the decomposition of plants, microbes, and organic matter within the soil. Compared to LC-MS, GC-MS offers distinct advantages in identifying complex metabolites. Therefore, GC-MS analysis was conducted for soil metabolic profiling of RC and WT rhizospheres. Rhizosphere soils were collected within 5 mm of root surface. Soil metabolite extraction was done as reported by Song et al. [43] (Text S2). Briefly, 2 g soil sample was placed in a 15 ml tube and supplemented with 3 ml of 75% methanol and 3 m of ethyl acetate. In this assay, 10 µL adonitol (10 mg/ml) was used as the internal standards. After homogenization with a 45-Hz ball mill for 1 min, samples were subjected to ultrasound for 10 min in ice water. Then, they were centrifuged for 10 min at 10,000 rpm and 4 °C. Their supernatants were transferred to 15 ml tubes and supplemented with a mixture of 3 ml 75% methanol and 3 ml ethyl acetate. The supernatants were subjected to ball milling and then filtered using 0.45 μm pore size (Millipore) and dried without heating in a vacuum concentrato. A solution of 100 L of methoxyamine (20 mg/ml in pyridine) hydrochloride was used to dissolve the samples under incubation at 37 °C for 2 h. Following this, 70 µL MSTFA was added and a 30-min trimethylsilylation reaction performed at 37 °C. The soil metabolome was analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) using a Shimadzu GC-2010 plus equipped with a Shimadzu TQ8040 triple-quadrupole MS (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Soil metabolites were determined as shown in Text S2. Based on the GC-MS spectrum, soil metabolites were identified using the NIST MS search 2.0 from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The concentrations of added internal standards were used to normalize the data matrix.

Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was performed to visualize the high-dimensional data and determine the variation in root and soil metabolomics between RC and WT. OPLS-DA was applied after log transformation (log2) and mean centering of data. To avoid overfitting, a permutation test (200 permutations) was performed. Significantly regulated metabolites between groups were determined by VIP ≥ 1 and absolute Log2FC (fold change) ≥ 1 VIP values were obtained from OPLS-DA results, which also includes plots of score and permutation, and were generated using “MetaboAnalystR” in R. The identified metabolites were annotated using the KEGG compound database (http://www.kegg.jp/kegg/compound/). Then, annotated metabolites were mapped to the KEGG pathway database (http://www.kegg.jp/kegg/pathway.html). Pheatmap R package (version 1.0.12) was used to create heatmaps.

Analysis of the effects of specific metabolites on rice plant and root-associated bacteria growth

Citric acid was used to study the effects of root metabolites on root-associated bacteria growth. Briefly, 250 g of soil for rice cultivation was filled in a plastic cup and mixed with 200 mL of 50 µmol/L citric acid solution. Then, abundances of the six root-associated bacterial strains were assayed by qPCR at 24 h, 48 h, 7 d and 14 d after citric acid treatment. Growth parameters of rice plants were analyzed on the 14th day after citric acid treatment. Six root-associated bacterial strains (those selected to design a SynCom) were used in this assay. The citric acid was filter sterilized and aseptically added to the 8-fold dilution of LB medium to final concentrations of 0 µmol/L, 1 µmol/L, 5 µmol/L, 20 µmol/L, 50 µmol/L and 100 µmol/L, respectively. Then, 10 µL activated bacterial liquid for each bacterial strains were added to each tube. The strains were cultured at 30° C for 10 h under 180 rpm in a constant-temperature oscillator. Then, 200 uL of the culture medium was added to a 96-well enzyme labeled plate and the absorbance determined at 600 nm. To study its effect on the growth of six root-associated bacteria strains in the natural soil environment, citric acid was also added to the soil that used to cultivate the rice.

Results

Overexpressed OSCIPK2 in rice root promoted nitrogen uptake and plant growth under nitrogen-limiting conditions

To study differences in nitrogen uptake and utilization characteristics between RC and WT genotypes, four nitrogen fertilizer levels were set in field experiments. The yield of RC increased significantly by 11.3% and 5.75% under nitrogen inputs of 0 kg·ha− 1 and 75 kg·ha− 1, respectively, compared to WT, primarily due to an increase in effective panicles (Table S2). No significant difference was observed between RC and WT at nitrogen inputs of 150 kg·ha− 1 and 225 kg·ha− 1. The variation trend of nitrogen levels between RC and WT were consist with the change trend of yield. Compared with WT, the nitrogen levels in RC were significantly increased by 11.75% and 4.42% at nitrogen fertilizer level of 0 kg·ha− 1 and 75 kg·ha− 1, respectively (Table S3). A quadratic equation was employed to analyze the relationship between yield and nitrogen application rates. The correlation coefficient R2 of the quadratic equation surpassed 0.99, indicating a high degree of fit. Based on the quadratic equation, the theoretical yield of RC was higher than that of WT. Furthermore, a reduction of 10.45% in nitrogen supply did not result in a noticeable decrease in yield for RC when compared to WT (Table S4).

To mitigate the impact of field environment variables and facilitate sampling procedures, RC and WT were transplanted into plastic pots. The most significant disparity in yield between RC and WT was observed at the 0 kg·ha− 1 nitrogen level in the field experiment. Consequently, a nitrogen-free treatment (0 kg·ha− 1) was implemented in the pot experiment. RC exhibited superior performance compared to WT during both the heading and maturation stages (Fig. 1). Compared to WT, shoot length, total dry mass, leaf SPAD value and total nitrogen content of RC were increased by 10.06%, 15.68%,13.85% and 15.85% at the heading stage, respectively. At the maturation stage, yields were measured under low nitrogen conditions in pots, revealing that the yields of RC increased by 50.6% compared to WT (Table S5). This increase was significantly greater than the yield differences observed between RC and WT in the field experiment.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Comparisons between root-specific overexpressed OSCIPK2 (RC) rice and wild type (WT) rice in low nitrogen soils. Fourteen days old rice seedlings of RC and WT were transplanted into the same plastic pot containing filed soils without nitrogen supplementation (low-nitrogen conditions). Plant growths were measured at heading stage and maturity stage. (A) Phenotypic comparisons of RC and WT at heading and maturity stages. (B) Total nitrogen levels of RC and WT at the heading stage, as measured by the Kjeldahl method. (C) Shoot lengths of RC and WT at heading stage. (D) Total dry mass per plant of RC and WT at heading stage. (E) Leaf SPAD value of RC and WT at heading stage, as measured by SPAD meter. n = 10, ***p < 0.001, **p-value 0.001 to 0.01

Full size image

RC and WT have distinct root microbiota in low nitrogen soils

To assess differences in root microbiota abundance between RC and WT in low nitrogen soils, bacterial community profile for root microbiota was created by amplification of the 16 S rRNA gene targeting the V5–V7 region using primers 799 F and 1193R, followed by Illumina sequencing. A total of 42,857 effective tags with bacterial species annotations were obtained from 6 root samples, with each providing an average of 7,142 effective tags. Rarefaction curves were created based on OTUs at 97% similarity (Fig. S1) and appeared to reach a plateau. At a 97% sequence similarity cut-off, 777 and 748 were obtained in RC and WT roots, respectively.

To elucidate on effects of plant genotypes on root microbial diversity, α- andβ- diversity analyses were performed. α-diversity was used to assess the complexity of species diversity for each sample. Compared to WT root, there were higher values of Shannon, Chao1, Observed species and PD whole tree in RC root (Fig. 2A) indicating that bacterial communities in RC root were significantly more diverse and complex than those of WT root. β- diversity were calculated to assess species complexity. In the principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of Bray-Curtis similarities (β-diversity), the first two components (PC1 and PC2) of PCoA explained 70.24% and 12.86% of total bacterial community variations, respectively (Fig. 2B), implying clear differences in root bacteria composition between RC and WT.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Root microbiome for root-specific overexpressed OSCIPK2 (RC) rice and wild type (WT) rice. (A) Calculations of Shannon, Chao1, Observed_species and PD whole tree of root microbiome between RC and WT. (B) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of bacterial communities based on weighted Unifrac algorithm for two different root samples. Centroids of Bray–Curtis dissimilarity scores for the composition of root sample compartments in the RC differed from WT. (C) Relative abundance, at phylum level, of the dominant bacteria in RC and WT rice root. (D) Heatmap depicting that relative abundances of OTUs were increased in RC, compared to WT. Heatmap was generated using Mothur (version 1.31.2) and was color-coded based on row z-scores

Full size image

To establish plant genotype-mediated differences in root bacterium structures, pairwise comparisons were performed using DEseq2. At the phylum level, OTUs in RC and WT roots were primarily assigned to the 10 bacterial phyla. The dominant phyla between RC and WT sample was Proteobacteria, accounting for 87.92% and 88.75% of bacterial sequences, respectively. In addition, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria were also present in the two samples with relative abundances between 1% and 4%. The relative abundances of Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria were found to be significantly higher in RC root compared to WT root in nitrogen-limiting soils (p < 0.05; Fig. 2C). A total of 59 genera with differing abundances between RC and WT roots were identified at the genus level (p < 0.05), primarily belonging to the proteobacteria phyla. Of these, 34 genera exhibited increased abundances in RC roots (Fig. 2D), while 25 genera showed decreased abundances (Fig. S2). Functional analysis indicated that 11 genera enriched in RC roots were associated with nitrogen-fixing capabilities. They included Phenylobacterium [44], Rhizobium [45], Sphingomonas [46], Pleomorphomonas [47], Devosia [48] and Azospirillum [49]. To estimate population sizes of nitrogen-fixing bacteria in RC roots, qPCR assays of root samples from RC and WT at the heading stage were performed. The results showed that the copy numbers (×1012/g of root) of nifH genes in RC roots were significantly greater than those in WT roots (Fig. 3A), suggesting that in nitrogen-deficient soil conditions, the nitrogen fixation capabilities of RC roots may be heightened compared to WT roots.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Quantification of the nirH gene and specific bacterial strains in the roots of root-specifically overexpressed OSCIPK2 (RC) rice and wild type (WT) rice under the low nitrogen conditions. RNA was isolated from roots at the heading stage and used for qPCR. (A) Absolute abundance of nirH gene in the roots of RC and WT. (B-G) Absolute abundance of Devosia sp., Sphingomonas sp., Rhizobium sp., Phenylobacterium sp., Pleomorphomonas sp., and Azspirillum sp.in the roots of RC and WT. The absolute abundance of nifH and specifically bacterial strains in roots were quantified relative to a standard curve for plasmids containing the target gene or bacterial strains sequence inserts. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation (one-way analysis of variance, n = 3). ***p < 0.001, **p-value 0.001 to 0.01

Full size image

Acquisition and quantification of specific bacterial strains in roots

In order to investigate the functions of specific root bacteria enriched in RC root, 16SrRNA sequences of 34 root bacteria with increased relative abundances in RC were identified by aligning them against sequences from the rice root bacterial culture collection established by Zhang et al. [33]. Twenty-two unique bacterial strains were successfully identified (sequence identity ≥ 97%), with 6 bacterial species demonstrating nitrogen fixation capabilities (species of the genera Phenylobacterium, Rhizobium, Sphingomonas, Pleomorphomonas, Devosia and Azospirillum; Table S6) selected for further analysis. Quantification of these root bacteria strains was performed by qPCR. First, the standard curve was established according to absolute copies and their Ct values, respectively. In Figure S3, a linear correlation with an R2 value exceeding 0.99 was observed when plotting the Ct values relative to absolute copies of six bacterial strains, indicating the suitability of the standard curve for absolute quantification. The levels of Phenylobacterium sp., Rhizobium sp., Pleomorphomonas sp., Devosia sp., Sphingomonas sp., and Azospirillum sp. in RC roots showed enhancements of up to 2.48-, 1.85-, 1.42-, 1.79-, 1.39-, and 2.36-fold, respectively, compared to WT roots, consistent with results from deep pyrosequencing analysis (Fig. 3B-G).

Effects of root-associated bacteria on rice growth

In the current study, the functions of root-associated bacteria were verified using the method of SynCom. A SynCom was designed using six bacterial strains (Phenylobacterium sp., Rhizobium sp., Pleomorphomonas sp., Devosia sp., Sphingomonas sp., and Azospirillum sp.) to assess their impact on rice growth in low nitrogen environments. After a 14-day co-cultivation period with SynCom in sterile soil, there were no apparent phenotypic differences observed between the SynCom treatment and control groups (Fig. S4). Furthermore, the native soil from the experimental field was specifically selected for the cultivation of rice plants. Following a 14-day co-cultivation period with SynCom in the native soil, significant improvements were noted in the total nitrogen levels, shoot length, total dry mass, and leaf SPAD values of the rice plants. These enhancements showed increases of 1.48- 1.08-, 1.16-, and 1.34-fold, respectively, compared to the control group. During a comparable growth period, RC transgenic rice demonstrated significant increases in total nitrogen levels, shoot length, total dry mass, and leaf SPAD values compared to the control group. Conversely, the SynCom group displayed notable decreases in total nitrogen levels, total dry mass, and leaf SPAD values when compared to RC, with no significant difference observed in shoot length (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Synthetic microbial communities (SynCom) promoted rice growth in low-nitrogen soils. Fourteen days old rice seedlings were transplanted into plastic cups containing 250 g soil without nitrogen supplementation (low-nitrogen conditions). The soil was the same as in the pot experiment and mixed with SynCom, which was consisted of Phenylobacterium sp., Rhizobium sp., Pleomorphomonas sp., Devosia sp., Sphingomonas sp. and Azspirillum sp.,. After 14 days of SynCom treatment, the growth parameters were measured. (A) Rice growth after 14 days of SynCom treatment. (B) Total nitrogen content per plant, as measured by the Kjeldahl method. (C) Shoot length. (D) Total dry mass per plant. (E) Leaf SPAD value, as measured by SPAD meter. n = 10. ***p < 0.001, **p-value 0.001 to 0.01, *p-value 0.05 to 0.01

Full size image

RC and WT had distinct root metabolomes in low N soil

Metabolomic profiling via LC-MS analysis identified 427 root metabolites in RC and WT plants grown in low nitrogen soils. OPLS-DA analysis revealed significant differences in root metabolomes between the two (Fig. 5A), suggesting distinct metabolic strategies for nitrogen adaptation. Metabolites with VIP values ≥ 1.0 and p < 0.05 were considered significantly change. The OPLS-DA model revealed 40 significantly differentially expressed metabolites (Fig. 5B, Table S7), with 27 up-regulated and 13 down-regulated in RC roots (Fig. 5C). The enrichment analysis showed that differential metabolites mainly involve in the biosynthesis of flavonoids and organic acids (Fig. 5D). The findings revealed that roots of the RC genotype exhibited elevated concentrations of organic acids, such as adipic acid, citric acid, and citraconic acid, in comparison to roots of the WT genotype. This suggests the significant contribution of organic acids in facilitating the response of rice roots to low nitrogen conditions.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Metabolites fingerprinting of root metabolites of root-specific overexpressed OSCIPK2 (RC) rice and wild type (WT) rice under nitrogen-limiting condition. (A) Orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) scores scatter plot for RC and WT based on root metabolic profiles. Data were obtained by metabolite fingerprinting (UPLC-MS/MS analysis in positive and negative ion mode and controlled by Analyst 1.6.3 software). (B) VIP (Variable importance in the project)-plot of the OPLS-DA model. Root metabolites with VIP scores ≥ 1 were considered to be significantly differentially expressed between RC and WT. (C) Metabolic pathway analysis of the identified differentially expressed metabolites. Root metabolites were identified by searching by the self-built database, MWDB (Metware biotechnology Co., Ltd. Wuhan, China) (http://www.metware.cn/). Identified metabolites were annotated and mapped to KEGG database (http://www.kegg.jp/kegg). UP-and Down-regulated metabolites indicated increased or decreased metabolite levels in RC relative to WT. (D) Heatmap analysis of differentially expressed root metabolites between RC and WT. High and low metabolite levels are represented as reddish and greenish scales, respectively. Heatmaps were created using the pheatmap R package (version 1.0.12)

Full size image

RC and WT had distinct rhizophere soil metabolomes in low N soil

Metabolomic profiling using GC-MS analysis revealed the presence of 143 soil metabolites in the rhizospheres of RC and WT plants grown in a nitrogen-deficient environment (Fig. 6A). Of these metabolites, 23 exhibited significant differences, with 18 showing up-regulation and 5 down-regulation in RC compared to WT. Specifically, organic acids such as fumaric acid, malic acid, and citric acid were found to be more prevalent in the rhizospheres of RC plants. Additionally, alcohols emerged as the second group of metabolites displaying differential expression between the rhizosphere soils of RC and WT plants. Three sugars (D-glucose, sucrose, D-mannose) were significantly higher in RC rhizosphere compared to WT (Fig. 6D). KEGG analysis revealed enrichment in citrate cycle, secondary metabolites biosynthesis, fatty acid biosynthesis, and starch/sucrose metabolism in differentially expressed metabolites in rhizosphere soils. Of particular significance, the critical intermediate citric acid in the citrate cycle exhibits an increasing trend in both the rhizosphere soil and root system of RC. This suggests the citric acid may play an important role in assembly of root microbiome under low nitrogen environments.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Metabolites fingerprinting of rhizosphere soil metabolites of root-specific overexpressed OSCIPK2 (RC) rice and wild type (WT) rice under nitrogen-limiting conditions. (A) Orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) scores scatter plot for RC and WT based on soil metabolic profiles. Data were obtained by metabolite fingerprinting of GC-MS. (B) VIP (Variable importance in the project)-plot of the OPLS-DA model. Soil metabolites with VIP scores ≥ 1 were considered to be significantly differentially expressed between RC and WT. (C) Metabolic pathway analysis of the identified differentially expressed metabolites. Soil metabolites were identified by searching in National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) library (NIST Version 14.0). the identified metabolites were annotated and mapped to KEGG database (http://www.kegg.jp/kegg). UP-and Down-regulated metabolites indicated increased or decreased metabolite levels in RC, relative to WT. (D) Heatmap analysis of differentially expressed soil metabolites between RC and WT. High and low metabolite levels are presented as reddish and greenish scales, respectively. Heatmaps were created using the pheatmap R package (version 1.0.12)

Full size image

Effects of citric acid on growth of rice plant and root-associated bacteria

The present study examines the effects of citric acid on the growth of root microbiota in LB medium. Six root-associated bacteria strains, which were selected to design a SynCom, were used in this experiments. The findings indicate that the biomasses of Phenylobacterium SP., Rhizobium SP., Pleomorphomonas SP., Devosia SP. and Sphingomonas SP. gradually increased citric acid levels from 0 to 50 µmol/L. At 100 µmol/L, no additional growth in biomass was observed. (Fig. 7A). Furthermore, citric acid (50 µmol/L) was directly added into the low nitrogen soil cultivated with WT rice. However, there were no obvious differences in growth of rice plant in low nitrogen soils on the 14th day after citric acid treatment (Fig. S5). Quantitative PCR analysis demonstrated a significant increase in the abundance of five bacterial strains in soil, namely Phenylobacterium SP., Rhizobium SP., Pleomorphomonas SP., Devosia SP., and Sphingomonas SP., within 48 h following citric acid treatment (Fig. 7B). However, by the 14th day, the differences in abundance of all selected bacterial strains between the citric acid and water treatment groups were found to be statistically insignificant. Furthermore, analyses of variations in nifH abundance in response to citric acid treatment were conducted, revealing significant differences in gene copy numbers within 48 h, while differences in gene copy numbers at days 7 and 14 were deemed insignificant (Fig. 7C).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Effects of citric acid on growth of root-associated bacteria. (A) Effects of increasing citric acid concentrations (0,1, 5, 20, 50 and 100 µmol/L) on the growth of root-associated bacteria in LB medium. Bacterial growth is presented as absorbance value at OD 600 nm. (B) Effects of 50 µmol/L citric acid on root-associated bacteria abundance in the low nitrogen soils. (C) Effects of 50 µmol/L citric acid on absolute abundance of nifH gene in the low nitrogen soils. Citric acid was directly applied to the soil cultivated with 14 days old rice seedlings. Soil samples were collected at 24 h, 48 h,7 and 14 days after citric acid treatment, and used for the DNA extraction and qPCR. The absolute abundances of nifH and root-associated bacterial in soil were quantified relative to a standard curve for plasmids containing the target gene or bacterial strains sequence inserts. Columns with different letters are statistically different (LSD test, p < 0.05). ***p < 0.001, **p-value 0.001 to 0.01

Full size image

Discussion

The advancement of cultivars with high nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) or low nitrogen tolerance is essential for the progression of sustainable agriculture. Nitrogen uptake and transport efficiency are influenced by the plant species and genotypes. A prior investigation demonstrated that the overexpression of OSCIPK2 in rice roots (RC) notably enhanced nitrogen uptake in low-nitrogen soils [32]. The findings of this study indicate that a reduction of 10.45% in nitrogen supply did not lead to a significant decrease in yield for RC compared to WT in an open-field system. Furthermore, the study observed higher yields for RC in the pot system compared to the field system, potentially due to lower total soil nitrogen levels in the pot system relative to the field system. These findings suggest that OSCIPK2 is a gene associated with low nitrogen tolerance in rice plants, facilitating increased nitrogen absorption from soils under conditions of nitrogen deficiency. Recent research has demonstrated a strong correlation between nitrogen uptake in crops and the composition of the root microbiome [33, 50]. Plants attract root microbiota from the surrounding soil through the release of root exudates. The presence of root microbiota expands the ecological niche and metabolic capabilities of plants, enhancing nutrient uptake, promoting plant growth, and improving responses to environmental stressors [51, 52]. The current investigation utilized a multi-omics approach, integrating microbiome sequencing with metabolomics, to demonstrate that OSCIPK2 induces substantial changes in the composition of root-associated bacterial communities and metabolite profiles in root and rhizosphere soils under conditions of nitrogen limitation. This study provides evidence supporting the notion that interactions between genotype and microbiome influence the phenotype of plants [53].

High-throughput sequencing analysis demonstrated a clear distinction in root bacterial composition between the RC and WT plants, suggesting a significant impact of OSCIPK2 on root bacteria establishment in nitrogen-limited environments. Previous studies have shown that plant genotypes significantly influence the composition of root-microbiome interactions. For instance, the root-specific transcription factor MYB72 plays a crucial role in regulating the excretion of coumarin scopoletin, a phenolic compound that aids in iron mobilization and exhibits antibacterial properties against certain beneficial microbial communities associated with roots [54]. Additionally, another study has shown that genes responsible for phosphate starvation responses facilitate the recruitment of root microbiomes necessary for efficient phosphate absorption by plant roots [55]. Subsequent analysis demonstrated greater diversities in root microbiota associated with RC compared to WT cultivars, suggesting that RC roots harbored a larger number of bacterial species. Recent studies on rice have also shown that the increased microbial diversities in indica cultivars compared to japonica cultivars contribute to the high nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in indica [33]. Thus, a high microbial diversity in rice roots may play a significant role in nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiency.

Genus-level analysis revealed that Phenylobacterium, Rhizobium, Sphingomonas, Pleomorphomonas, Devosia and Azospirillum were the predominant microbiota present in RC root. Notably, these genera have been previously documented to possess nitrogen-fixing capabilities. Rhizobium is a well-known nitrogen-fixing bacterium in legumes and rice roots [56], while other bacteria like Azospirillum [57], Pleomorphomonas [58], and Sphingomonas [46] are also associated with nitrogen fixation in rice roots. Phenylobacterium [44] and Devosia [48] genera have been reported to have nitrogen-fixing capacities in other crops. These results indicated that the capabilities of nitrogen fixation in RC root enhanced in the low nitrogen soil, which was also confirmed by increased copies of the nifH gene. In the context of rice cultivation, nitrogen-fixing bacteria have been found to contribute between 36 and 42% of the plant’s nitrogen requirements [59, 60]. This study examined the abundance of six bacterial strains belonging to nitrogen-fixing genera in rice roots, revealing a significantly higher presence of these strains in RC roots compared to WT. The findings suggest that the overexpression of OSCIPK2 in rice roots promotes the colonization of nitrogen-fixing bacteria, thereby enhancing their nitrogen-fixing capacity and enabling RC plants to better assimilate nitrogen in nitrogen-deficient environments compared to WT plants. Notably, in the field experiment, it was observed that total nitrogen levels in RC plants exhibited a significant increase only in low nitrogen conditions, suggesting that high nitrogen may inhibit their nitrogen-fixing abilities. This is similar to the “nitrogen repression” effect seen in legumes.

To determine the roles of bacteria present in RC roots, the SynCom experiment was conducted. SynCom serves as a valuable tool for studying the factors that facilitate the formation of microbial communities, their regulatory functions, and the molecular mechanisms linked to plant growth and development [61]. Our findings revealed the presence of six nitrogen-fixing bacterial strains within the SynCom, which notably enhanced the growth of rice in nitrogen-deficient soils, underscoring the significance of bacteria inhabiting RC roots in facilitating plant nitrogen absorption and growth. Significantly, when SynCom was utilized in sterile soils, no discernible phenotypic distinctions were observed between the SynCom treatment and control groups. Previous research often focused on plant varieties cultivated under largely sterile conditions, yet the presence of a native microbiome in field settings suggests a non-sterile environment. Inoculating rhizosphere soil with external strains has been shown to enhance plant growth by activating local bacterial species with known plant growth-promoting properties [62,63,64]. Our research also revealed that the six bacterial strains comprising SynCom have the potential to act as “hub microorganisms” in facilitating the assembly of the RC root microbiome. These key species can significantly impact microbial community structures through robust biotic interactions with the host plant or other microorganisms, rather than solely due to their own numerical dominance [65, 66]. The presence of hub microorganisms can exert direct and indirect influences on microbiome assembly and facilitate interactions between the plant and its associated microbial community [67]. Future studies should explore the effects of these hub microorganisms on the assembly of the RC root microbiome under nitrogen-limiting conditions. Furthermore, in this research, the six root-associated bacterial strains were combined into a SynCom in equal quantities. However, for subsequent investigations, it would be more ecologically valid to construct the SynCom based on the relative abundances of these six bacterial strains as identified in the soil or root sample through qPCR, thereby providing a more accurate representation of the bacterial community composition. In addition, it is noteworthy that while SynCom treatment can indeed enhance rice growth to some extent in low-nitrogen soils, there remains a disparity compared to RC transgenic plant. Perhaps this discrepancy arises from the fact that certain beneficial bacteria aiding nitrogen absorption in the root system of RC have yet to be isolated and identified in the present study.

Plants use ∼ 20% of their photosynthesized carbon to make root-derived organic molecules, which stimulate the formation of distinct root microbiota from the surrounding soils [54, 68, 69]. A study in Arabidopsis showed that triterpenes produced by roots can shape the root-associated microbiome [70]. A total of 40 and 23 differentially expressed metabolites were identified in root and rhizosphere soils between RC and WT, indicating that OSCIPK2 regulates the synthesis and secretion of root metabolites in response to low nitrogen stress. Under a low nitrogen environment, organic acids were the main differential metabolic categories both in the rhizosphere soil and root between RC and WT. The organic acids secreted by plant roots can serve as carbon and nutrient sources for the growth of soil microorganisms and play regulatory roles in plant–soil–microbe interactions [71, 72]. Previous studies involving Tartary buckwheat [73], maize [74] and rice [75] showed that organic acids exuded by roots are beneficial to plants under low nitrogen stress by regulating soil nutrient availability. Plants secrete organic acids to recruit beneficial microbes in the root zone for coping with changes in inorganic nitrogen levels in rhizosphere soils [76]. Importantly, we found that under a low nitrogen environment, citric acid levels were significantly increased in both root and rhizosphere soils of RC in comparison with WT. Citric acid, a key component in the citrate cycle, is synthesized through the enzymatic action of citrate synthase, which combines acetyl-CoA and oxaloacetate. CIPKs, a novel class of plant Ca2+ sensors, have been identified as playing a significant role in response to various environmental stresses [77]. It is understood that the activity of CIPKs can be regulated by Ca2+ interacting with citrate synthase [78, 79]. Consequently, it is hypothesized that CIPKs may influence the production of citric acid by modulating intracellular Ca2+ levels in plants. The OsCIPK17 gene in rice has been demonstrated to enhance rice drought resistance and play a role in the citric acid accumulation within the citrate cycle [80]. Ca2+ have the potential to enhance soybean tolerance to aluminum ions (Al3+) by stimulating citric acid secretion and mitigating oxidative stress damage [81]. Nevertheless, further investigation is required to elucidate the precise mechanisms by which OsCIPK2 modulates citric acid biosynthesis in response to low nitrogen conditions.

In a previous study, some specific beneficial bacterial species, such as those known for promoting crop growth, were observed to be negatively impacted by citric acid [69]. For example, citric acid was identified as a chemotactic attractant for Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS365, a strain capable of establishing itself on tomato roots [82]. Likewise, watermelon roots release citric acid, which facilitates the colonization of roots by the growth-promoting rhizobacteria, Paenibacillus polymyxa SQR-21 [83]. In the present study, the application of a concentration of citric acid (50 µmol/L) was found to enhance the growth of Phenylobacterium SP., Rhizobium SP., Pleomorphomonas SP., Devosia SP., and Sphingomonas SP., known for their nitrogen-fixing capabilities. Furthermore, the abundances of these bacterial strains in soil were significantly elevated at 24 h and 48 h post citric acid treatment. Gene copy numbers of nifH in soil revealed the same trend as the abundance change of the above 5 bacterial strains. These findings suggest that optimal levels of citric acid may play a crucial role in enhancing the nitrogen-fixing abilities of RC rice in low nitrogen soils. A study on the intercropping of maize and alfalfa demonstrated a positive correlation between atmospheric nitrogen levels and citric acid concentrations in the rhizosphere of alfalfa [84]. This relationship may facilitate the mobilization of soluble resources for nitrogen fixation in the absence of additional nitrogen inputs. There were no changes in the abundance of above 5 nitrogen-fixing bacterial strains in the soil on days 7 and 14 after citric acid treatment. This resulted in no significant differences in plant growth parameters, including total nitrogen levels at 14 days in low nitrogen soils. The complexity of soil microorganisms in the rhizosphere and rapid utilization or absorption of citric acid by other microbial communities may have contributed to this outcome. These findings suggest that sustained-release technologies should be taken into account when applying essential metabolites to soil in order to facilitate the development and proliferation of nutrient-related microorganisms.

Conclusion

Enhanced OSCIPK2 expressions in roots could promote citric acid production by rice to recruit nitrogen-fixing bacteria in its root from bulk soil in response to low-nitrogen stress. The use of SynCom made from RC root-enriched bacteria could significantly improve plant nitrogen acquisition in low-nitrogen soil. These results demonstrate that plant genotype has a strong effect on root microbiome diversity and abundance and influences plant nitrogen acquisition. However, our study focused on a specific set of root-associated bacterial strains and a particular rice variety under nitrogen-limitation conditions. Future studies could explore the interactions between different rice varieties and their associated root microbiomes. Such research would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the intricate relationships between plants and their associated microbial communities, paving the way for the development of more effective and sustainable agricultural practices.

Data availability

Data is provided within the manuscript or supplementary information files.

Abbreviations

RC:

Root-specific overexpressed OSCIPK2

SynCom:

Synthetic microbial communities

NUE:

Nitrogen use efficiency

CIPK:

CBL-interacting protein kinases

OTUs:

Operational taxonomic units

qPCR:

Quantitative real-time PCR

PCA:

Principal component analysis

VIP:

Variable importance in the project

References

  1. Yashveer S, Singh V, Kaswan V, Kaushik A, Tokas J. Green biotechnology, nanotechnology and bio-fortification: perspectives on novel environment-friendly crop improvement strategies. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 2014;30(2):113–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pieterse CM, Zamioudis C, Berendsen RL, Weller DM, Van Wees SC, Bakker PA. Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2014;52:347–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mueller UG, Sachs JL. Engineering microbiomes to improve plant and animal health. Trends Microbiol. 2015;23(10):606–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Raza W, Wei Z, Jousset A, Shen Q, Friman V-P. Extended plant metarhizobiome: understanding volatile organic compound signaling in plant-microbe metapopulation networks. Msystems. 2021;6(4):e00849–00821.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bai B, Liu W, Qiu X, Zhang J, Zhang J, Bai Y. The root microbiome: community assembly and its contributions to plant fitness. J Integr Plant Biol. 2022;64(2):230–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Friesen ML, Porter SS, Stark SC, von Wettberg EJ, Sachs JL, Martinez-Romero E. Microbially mediated plant functional traits. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2011;42:23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dastogeer KM, Tumpa FH, Sultana A, Akter MA, Chakraborty A. Plant microbiome–an account of the factors that shape community composition and diversity. Curr Plant Biology. 2020;23:100161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu F, Mao J, Kong W, Hua Q, Feng Y, Bashir R, Lu T. Interaction variability shapes succession of synthetic microbial ecosystems. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hardoim PR, van Overbeek LS, van Elsas JD. Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth. Trends Microbiol. 2008;16(10):463–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lemanceau P, Blouin M, Muller D, Moenne-Loccoz Y. Let the Core Microbiota be functional. Trends Plant Sci. 2017;22(7):583–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Walker TS, Bais HP, Grotewold E, Vivanco JM. Root exudation and rhizosphere biology. Plant Physiol. 2003;132(1):44–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mayak S, Tirosh T, Glick BR. Plant growth-promoting bacteria confer resistance in tomato plants to salt stress. Plant Physiol Bioch. 2004;42(6):565–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang J, Kloepper JW, Ryu CM. Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress. Trends Plant Sci. 2009;14(1):1–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ehrmann J, Ritz K. Plant: soil interactions in temperate multi-cropping production systems. Plant Soil. 2014;376(1):1–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sukumar P, Legue V, Vayssieres A, Martin F, Tuskan GA, Kalluri UC. Involvement of auxin pathways in modulating root architecture during beneficial plant–microorganism interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 2013;36(5):909–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Millet YA, Danna CH, Clay NK, Songnuan W, Simon MD, Werck-Reichhart D, Ausubel FM. Innate immune responses activated in Arabidopsis roots by microbe-associated molecular patterns. Plant Cell. 2010;22(3):973–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Teixeira PJP, Colaianni NR, Fitzpatrick CR, Dangl JL. Beyond pathogens: microbiota interactions with the plant immune system. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2019;49:7–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Woll K, Borsuk LA, Stransky H, Nettleton D, Schnable PS, Hochholdinger F. Isolation, characterization, and pericycle-specific transcriptome analyses of the novel maize lateral and seminal root initiation mutant rum1. Plant Physiol. 2005;139(3):1255–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu P, He X, Baer M, Beirinckx S, Tian T, Moya YA, Zhang X, Deichmann M, Frey FP, Bresgen V. Plant flavones enrich rhizosphere Oxalobacteraceae to improve maize performance under nitrogen deprivation. Nat Plants. 2021;7(4):481–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yan XL, Wu P, Ling HQ, Xu GH, Xu FS, Zhang QF. Plant nutriomics in China: an overview. Ann Bot-London. 2006;98(3):473–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fan MS, Shen JB, Yuan LX, Jiang RF, Chen XP, Davies WJ, Zhang FS. Improving crop productivity and resource use efficiency to ensure food security and environmental quality in China. J Exp Bot. 2012;63(1):13–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang F, Wang J, Zhang W, Cui Z, Ma W, Chen X, Jiang R. Situation and counter measures of nutrient utilization efficiency for major cereal crops in China. Acta Pedol Sin. 2008;45(5):915–24.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sun HY, Qian Q, Wu K, Luo JJ, Wang SS, Zhang CW, Ma YF, Liu Q, Huang XZ, Yuan QB, et al. Heterotrimeric G proteins regulate nitrogen-use efficiency in rice. Nat Genet. 2014;46(6):652–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tang WJ, Ye J, Yao XM, Zhao PZ, Xuan W, Tian YL, Zhang YY, Xu S, An HZ, Chen GM, et al. Genome-wide associated study identifies NAC42-activated nitrate transporter conferring high nitrogen use efficiency in rice. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):5279.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Tabuchi M, Abiko T, Yamaya T. Assimilation of ammonium ions and reutilization of nitrogen in rice (Oryza sativa L). J Exp Bot. 2007;58(9):2319–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu B, Fan H, Sun C, Yuan M, Geng X, Ding X, Ma R, Yan N, Sun X, Zheng CJSR. New insights into the role of chrysanthemum calcineurin B–like interacting protein kinase CmCIPK23 in nitrate signaling in Arabidopsis roots. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):1018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Luan S. The CBL-CIPK network in plant calcium signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2009;14(1):37–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dong QY, Bai BW, Almutairi BO, Kudla J. Emerging roles of the CBL-CIPK calcium signaling network as key regulatory hub in plant nutrition. J Plant Physiol. 2021;257:153335.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ho CH, Lin SH, Hu HC, Tsay YF. CHL1 functions as a nitrate sensor in plants. Cell. 2018;2009–138–6–6:1184–94.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Straub T, Ludewig U, Neuhauser B. The kinase CIPK23 inhibits ammonium transport in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2017;29(2):409–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Hu HC, Wang YY, Tsay YF. AtCIPK8, a CBL-interacting protein kinase, regulates the low-affinity phase of the primary nitrate response. Plant Journal: Cell Mol Biology. 2009;57(2):264–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Khan MU, Li P, Amjad H, Khan AQ, Arafat Y, Waqas M, Li Z, Noman A, Islam W, Wu L, et al. Exploring the potential of overexpressed OsCIPK2 Rice as a Nitrogen utilization efficient crop and analysis of its Associated Rhizo-Compartmental Microbial communities. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(15):3636.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang J, Liu YX, Zhang N, Hu B, Jin T, Xu H, Qin Y, Yan P, Zhang X, Guo X, et al. NRT1.1B is associated with root microbiota composition and nitrogen use in field-grown rice. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(6):676–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Negi NP, Prakash G, Narwal P, Panwar R, Kumar D, Chaudhry B. Rustagi AJFiPS: the calcium connection: exploring the intricacies of calcium signaling in plant-microbe interactions. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1248648.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Oldroyd GEJNRM. Speak, friend, and enter: signalling systems that promote beneficial symbiotic associations in plants. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11(4):252–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Harrison MJJARM. Signaling in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2005;59:19–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bao Z, Shi C, Tu W, Li L, Li QJEP. Recent developments in modification of biochar and its application in soil pollution control and ecoregulation. Environ Pollut 2022, 120184.

  38. Edgar RC. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods. 2013;10(10):996–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DJ, Weber CF. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75(23):7537–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Pena AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7(5):335–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Jami E, Israel A, Kotser A, Mizrahi I. Exploring the bovine rumen bacterial community from birth to adulthood. ISME J. 2013;7(6):1069–79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang Y, Sheng H-F, He Y, Wu J-Y, Jiang Y-X, Tam NF-Y, Zhou H-W. Comparison of the levels of bacterial diversity in freshwater, intertidal wetland, and marine sediments by using millions of illumina tags. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78(23):8264–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Song Y, Li X, Yao S, Yang X, Jiang X. Correlations between soil metabolomics and bacterial community structures in the pepper rhizosphere under plastic greenhouse cultivation. Sci Total Environ. 2020;728:138439.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Yang Y, Wang N, Guo X, Zhang Y, Ye B. Comparative analysis of bacterial community structure in the rhizosphere of maize by high-throughput pyrosequencing. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(5):e0178425.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Masson-Boivin C, Giraud E, Perret X, Batut J. Establishing nitrogen-fixing symbiosis with legumes: how many rhizobium recipes? Trends Microbiol. 2009;17(10):458–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Videira SS, De Araujo JLS, da Silva Rodrigues L, Baldani VLD, Baldani JI. Occurrence and diversity of nitrogen-fixing Sphingomonas bacteria associated with rice plants grown in Brazil. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009;293(1):11–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Xie C-H, Yokota A. Pleomorphomonas oryzae gen. nov., sp. nov., a nitrogen-fixing bacterium isolated from paddy soil of Oryza sativa %J society for General Microbiology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005;55(3):1233–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Rivas R, Velázquez E, Willems A, Vizcaíno N, Subba-Rao NS, Mateos PF, Gillis M, Dazzo FB, Martínez-Molina E. A new species of Devosia that forms a unique nitrogen-fixing root-nodule symbiosis with the aquatic legume Neptunia natans (lf) Druce. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(11):5217–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Steenhoudt O, Vanderleyden J. Azospirillum, a free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterium closely associated with grasses: genetic, biochemical and ecological aspects. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2000;24(4):487–506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Paul K, Saha C, Nag M, Mandal D, Naiya H, Sen D, Mitra S, Kumar M, Bose D, Mukherjee G, et al. A tripartite Interaction among the Basidiomycete Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, N2-Fixing Endobacteria, and Rice Improves Plant Nitrogen Nutrition. Plant Cell. 2020;32(2):486–507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Berendsen RL, Pieterse CMJ, Bakker PAHM. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci. 2012;17(8):478–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Huang XF, Chaparro JM, Reardon KF, Zhang RF, Shen QR, Vivanco JM. Rhizosphere interactions: root exudates, microbes, and microbial communities. Botany 2014, 92(4).

  53. Ravanbakhsh M, Kowalchuk GA, Jousset A. Root-associated microorganisms reprogram plant life history along the growth-stress resistance tradeoff. ISME J. 2019;13(12):3093–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Stringlis IA, Yu K, Feussner K, De Jonge R, Van Bentum S, Van Verk MC, Berendsen RL, Bakker PA, Feussner I, Pieterse CM. MYB72-dependent coumarin exudation shapes root microbiome assembly to promote plant health. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2018, 115(22):E5213-E5222.

  55. Castrillo G, Teixeira PJ, Paredes SH, Law TF, de Lorenzo L, Feltcher ME, Finkel OM, Breakfield NW, Mieczkowski P, Jones CD, et al. Root Microbiota drive direct integration of phosphate stress and immunity. Nature. 2017;543(7646):513–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. HH Z. Rhizobium-legume symbiosis and nitrogen fixation under severe conditions and in an arid climate. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999;63(4):968–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Ladha J, Barraquio W, Watanabe I. Immunological techniques to identify Azospirillum associated with wetland rice. Can J Microbiol. 1982;28(5):478–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Xie C-H, Yokota A. Pleomorphomonas oryzae gen. nov., sp. nov., a nitrogen-fixing bacterium isolated from paddy soil of Oryza sativa. Int J Syst Evol MicroBiol. 2005;55(3):1233–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Govindarajan M, Balandreau J, Kwon SW, Weon HY, Lakshminarasimhan C. Effects of the inoculation of Burkholderia Vietnamensis and related endophytic diazotrophic bacteria on grain yield of rice. Microb Ecol. 2008;55(1):21–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Malarvizhi P, Ladha J. Influence of available nitrogen and rice genotype on associative dinitrogen fixation. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1999;63(1):93–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Schmitz L, Yan Z, Schneijderberg M, de Roij M, Pijnenburg R, Zheng Q, Franken C, Dechesne A, Trindade LM, van Velzen R, Bisseling T, Geurts R, Cheng X. Synthetic bacterial community derived from a desert rhizosphere confers salt stress resilience to tomato in the presence of a soil microbiome. ISME J. 2022;16(8):1907–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Glick BR. Beneficial plant-bacterial interactions. Springer Cham; 2015.

  63. Chihaoui S-A, Trabelsi D, Jdey A, Mhadhbi H, Mhamdi R. Inoculation of Phaseolus vulgaris with the nodule-endophyte Agrobacterium sp. 10C2 affects richness and structure of rhizosphere bacterial communities and enhances nodulation and growth. Arch Microbiol. 2015;197(6):805–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Santoyo G, Orozco-Mosqueda MC, Govindappa M. Mechanisms of biocontrol and plant growth-promoting activity in soil bacterial species of Bacillus and Pseudomonas: a review. Biocontrol Sci Technol. 2012;22(8):855–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Hamonts K, Trivedi P, Garg A, Janitz C, Grinyer J, Holford P, Botha FC, Anderson IC, Singh BK. Field study reveals core plant microbiota and relative importance of their drivers. Environ Microbiol. 2018;20(1):124–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Agler MT, Ruhe J, Kroll S, Morhenn C, Kim ST, Weigel D, Kemen EM. Microbial Hub Taxa Link Host and abiotic factors to Plant Microbiome Variation. Plos Biol. 2016;14(1):e1002352.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Trivedi P, Leach JE, Tringe SG, Sa T, Singh BK. Plant-microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18(11):607–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Nguyen C. Rhizodeposition of organic C by plants: mechanisms and controls. Agronomie. 2003;23(5–6):375–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Zhalnina K, Louie KB, Hao Z, Mansoori N, da Rocha UN, Shi SJ, Cho HJ, Karaoz U, Loque D, Bowen BP, et al. Dynamic root exudate chemistry and microbial substrate preferences drive patterns in rhizosphere microbial community assembly. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3(4):470–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Huang AC, Jiang T, Liu YX, Bai YC, Reed J, Qu BY, Goossens A, Nutzmann HW, Bai Y, Osbourn A. A specialized metabolic network selectively modulates Arabidopsis root microbiota. Science. 2019;364(6440):eaau6389.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Yoshitomi K, Shann J. Corn (Zea mays L.) root exudates and their impact on 14 C-pyrene mineralization. Soil Biol Biochem. 2001;33(12–13):1769–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Rentz JA, Alvarez PJ, Schnoor JL. Benzo [a] pyrene co-metabolism in the presence of plant root extracts and exudates: implications for phytoremediation. Environ Pollut. 2005;136(3):477–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Chen W, Cui Y, Yang Y, Huangfu Q, Sun C. The Mechanical of Organic Acids Secreted by Roots of Tartary Buckwheat under the Effects of Low Nitrogen Stress. BioRxiv 2018:346064.

  74. Wang X, Gao Y, Zhang H, Shao Z, Sun B, Gao Q. Enhancement of rhizosphere citric acid and decrease of NO3–/NH4 + ratio by root interactions facilitate N fixation and transfer. Plant Soil. 2020;447(1):169–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Ji L, Li T, Zhang X, Yu H. Characteristics of organic acids and amino acids in root exudates of rice genotype with high nitrogen efficiency. Plant Nutr Fertilizer Sci. 2012;18(5):1046–55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Zhang N, Wang D, Liu Y, Li S, Shen Q, Zhang R. Effects of different plant root exudates and their organic acid components on chemotaxis, biofilm formation and colonization by beneficial rhizosphere-associated bacterial strains. Plant Soil. 2014;374(1):689–700.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Thakur P, Negi NP. CBL-CIPK: the ca + signals during abiotic stress response. Crop improvement: biotechnological advances. Boca Raton and London: CRC; 2021. pp. 63–74.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  78. Wan B, LaNoue K, Cheung J, Scaduto RJJBC. Regulation of citric acid cycle by calcium. J Biol Chem. 1989;264(23):13430–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Traaseth N, Elfering S, Solien J, Haynes V, Giulivi CJBBA-B. Role of calcium signaling in the activation of mitochondrial nitric oxide synthase and citric acid cycle.Biochimica. et Biophys Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics. 2004;1658(1–2):64–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Lu S, Chen Y, Wang S, Han B, Zhao C, Xue P, Zhang Y, Fang H, Wang B. Cao YJFiPS: combined metabolomic and transcriptomic analysis reveals key components of OsCIPK17 overexpression improves drought tolerance in rice. Front Plant Sci. 2023;13:1043757.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Hashimoto Y, Smyth TJ, Hesterberg D. Israel DWJSs, nutrition p: soybean root growth in relation to ionic composition in magnesium-amended acid subsoils: implications on root citrate ameliorating aluminum constraints. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2007;53(6):753–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. de Weert S, Vermeiren H, Mulders IH, Kuiper I, Hendrickx N, Bloemberg GV, Vanderleyden J, De Mot R, Lugtenberg BJ. Flagella-driven chemotaxis towards exudate components is an important trait for tomato root colonization by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2002;15(11):1173–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Ling N, Raza W, Ma J, Huang Q, Shen Q. Identification and role of organic acids in watermelon root exudates for recruiting Paenibacillus polymyxa SQR-21 in the rhizosphere. Eur J Soil Biol. 2011;47(6):374–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Wang X, Gao Y, Zhang H, Shao Z, Sun B, Gao QJP. Soil: enhancement of rhizosphere citric acid and decrease of NO 3–/NH 4+ ratio by root interactions facilitate N fixation and transfer. 2020, 447:169–82.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Yang Bai (Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Science) for his kind provision of the root-associated bacterial strains.

Funding

This work was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of Fujian (2021J01093) and the Open Project Fund of Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Genetics, Breeding, and Multiple Utilization of Crops of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (GBMUC-2019-002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of JunCao Science and Ecology, Fujian Agricultural and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350002, China

    Mengying Chen, He Lv, Zewen Wang, Yuhang Zeng, Wenxiong Lin & Zhixing Zhang

  2. Key Laboratory of Crop Ecology and Molecular Physiology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350002, China

    Mengying Chen, Shizhong Feng, He Lv, Zewen Wang, Yuhang Zeng, Wenxiong Lin & Zhixing Zhang

  3. Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Agroecological Processing and Safety Monitoring, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China

    Shizhong Feng, Wenxiong Lin & Zhixing Zhang

  4. Soil and Fertilizer & Resources and Environment Institute, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanchang, 330200, China

    Caihong Shao

Authors
  1. Mengying Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shizhong Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. He Lv
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zewen Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yuhang Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Caihong Shao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Wenxiong Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zhixing Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

WL and ZZ designed and supervised the project. MC, YZ, HL, ZW and SF performed the experiment work. ZZ, CS and MC performed the data analyses. MC wrote the manuscript and ZZ revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhixing Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors agree that the present work will be published.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, M., Feng, S., Lv, H. et al. OsCIPK2 mediated rice root microorganisms and metabolites to improve plant nitrogen uptake. BMC Plant Biol 24, 285 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-04982-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-04982-0

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us