Skip to main content
Download PDF

Integrated transcriptome and metabolome analysis reveals anthocyanin biosynthesis mechanisms in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) leaves under continuous blue light irradiation

BMC Plant Biology volume 24, Article number: 210 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Different metabolic compounds give pepper leaves and fruits their diverse colors. Anthocyanin accumulation is the main cause of the purple color of pepper leaves. The light environment is a critical factor affecting anthocyanin biosynthesis. It is essential that we understand how to use light to regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis in plants.

Result

Pepper leaves were significantly blue–purple only in continuous blue light or white light (with a blue light component) irradiation treatments, and the anthocyanin content of pepper leaves increased significantly after continuous blue light irradiation. This green-to-purple phenotype change in pepper leaves was due to the expression of different genes. We found that the anthocyanin synthesis precursor-related genes PAL and 4CL, as well as the structural genes F3H, DFR, ANS, BZ1, and F3’5’H in the anthocyanin synthesis pathway, had high expression under continuous blue light irradiation. Similarly, the expression of transcription factors MYB1R1-like, MYB48, MYB4-like isoform X1, bHLH143-like, and bHLH92-like isoform X3, and circadian rhythm-related genes LHY and COP1, were significantly increased after continuous blue light irradiation. A correlation network analysis revealed that these transcription factors and circadian rhythm-related genes were positively correlated with structural genes in the anthocyanin synthesis pathway. Metabolomic analysis showed that delphinidin-3-O-glucoside and delphinidin-3-O-rutinoside were significantly higher under continuous blue light irradiation relative to other light treatments. We selected 12 genes involved in anthocyanin synthesis in pepper leaves for qRT-PCR analysis, and the accuracy of the RNA-seq results was confirmed.

Conclusions

In this study, we found that blue light and 24-hour irradiation together induced the expression of key genes and the accumulation of metabolites in the anthocyanin synthesis pathway, thus promoting anthocyanin biosynthesis in pepper leaves. These results provide a basis for future study of the mechanisms of light quality and photoperiod in anthocyanin synthesis and metabolism, and our study may serve as a valuable reference for screening light ratios that regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis in plants.

Peer Review reports

Background

Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) is an important vegetable crop in China because of its high nutritional value and wide agronomic range [1]. Due to differences in metabolites, pepper leaves and fruits occur in various colors, including green, yellow, and purple. Anthocyanins are an important secondary flavonoid metabolite in plants, and anthocyanins usually produce red, blue, or purple colors in leaves and fruits (if cell fluid is acidic, red is produced, and if cell fluid is alkaline, blue is produced) [2]. Anthocyanins have pollination, seed dispersal, and resistance functions for plants [3, 4], and they also have health benefits for humans in the fields of anti-aging, beauty, and cardiovascular disease [5, 6]. The biosynthesis of plant anthocyanins is affected by many external environmental factors, such as light, hormones, sugars, and temperature, which can promote or inhibit anthocyanin synthesis [7]. Among these factors, light is considered to be key: light intensity, light quality, and photoperiod affect anthocyanin biosynthesis [8].

Previous studies have shown that anthocyanin glycoside-related genes are downregulated under low light or darkness in fruits and leaves, resulting in a reduction in anthocyanin content [9]. For example, compared to shaded pericarps, apple fruits exposed to sunshine collected more anthocyanin glycosides [10]. Light quality is crucial in anthocyanin synthesis and accumulation [11]. The effects of light quality on anthocyanin biosynthesis and accumulation vary with plant species, as do the regulatory effects of light quality on genes related to anthocyanin synthesis [12]. In a study of bayberry fruits, blue light induced the expression of genes related to anthocyanin synthesis, increasing the accumulation of anthocyanins in fruits [13]. Tao et al. [14] found that blue light strongly induced the accumulation of anthocyanins in red pear skin, while red light had almost no effect. Adding UV-A and Blue light irradiation to the growth environment of lettuce increased anthocyanin concentration in young lettuce leaves by 11% and 31%, respectively [11]. Blue light increased anthocyanin content and transcript levels of anthocyanin biosynthesis genes more than white or red light in strawberries [15]. Zhang et al. [16] confirmed that blue light significantly increased the anthocyanin content of Cabernet Sauvignon grapes compared to white light.

Studies of photoperiodic regulation suggest that the circadian clock is fundamental (in addition to photoreceptors) in detecting and responding to photoperiodic changes [8]. Therefore, plant anthocyanin biosynthesis is strictly regulated by circadian rhythms, forming a complex secondary metabolic network [17]. Continuous illumination is an important tool to understand the circadian rhythms of plants [18]. Continuous light (CL) refers to an environment where plants grow under continuous 24-hour light [19]. Photoperiod directly affects the synthesis of plant secondary metabolites [20,21,22]. Several studies have shown that prolonged illumination will increase the accumulation of anthocyanins in plants. Carvalho et al. [22] found an increase in gene expression related to the flavonoid synthesis pathway in sweet potato leaves after 30 d of treatment with 16 h of sunlight compared to 8 h of sunlight; this led to increased anthocyanin and flavonoid content. Similarly, a longer light duration can significantly increase the concentration of nutrients such as anthocyanins and phenolic compounds in cucumber seedlings, thus improving their nutritional quality [23]. Studies have also confirmed that continuous light has a positive effect on the growth, development, yield, and quality of horticultural plants [24,25,26].

Transcription factors play an important role in plant growth and development, secondary metabolic regulation by regulating gene expression [27, 28]. Transcriptional regulation modifies gene expression by changing the transcription rate, thereby affecting the biosynthesis of anthocyanins in plants [29]. Studies have shown that in the anthocyanin synthesis pathway of Arabidopsis thaliana, MYB transcription factor genes interact with bHLH transcription factor genes and WD40-repeat transcription factor genes to form the MYB-bHLH-WD40 protein complex (MBW) [30]. The R2R3-MYB plays a central role in the regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis and is a key element in the MBW complex that governs anthocyanin synthesis [31]. At present, R2R3-MYB has been found in many horticultural crops, such as maize [32], grape [33], tomato [34], and apple [10], and participates in regulating anthocyanin biosynthesis in response to light induction. In Solanaceae, the bHLH branch involved in the regulation of plant anthocyanin biosynthesis includes mainly the orthologous genes PhAN1 and PhjAF13 in petunia. Related studies have shown that compared with uncolored peppers and eggplant, the PhAN1 homologous genes CabHLH and SmbHLH were highly expressed in colored fruits and were positively correlated with anthocyanin structural genes and accumulation levels [35,36,37]. D’Amelia et al. confirmed that MYB transcription factors can interact with StAN1 and StbHLH [38]. In the WD40 protein family, TTG1 is an important transcription factor related to anthocyanin synthesis. The WD40 protein can provide a stable platform for MYB and bHLH proteins to form a MBW complex [39]. In addition to MBW, other transcription factor families have also been shown to play a role in flavonoid biosynthesis in higher plants, such as bZIP, NAC, and WRKY [31]. Nowadays, more and more consumers prefer foods rich in anthocyanins; thus, efficiently regulating the biosynthesis of anthocyanins in plants is of great significance. We studied the effects of monochromatic blue light and monochromatic red light on anthocyanin synthesis in pepper leaves under continuous light conditions. The pepper leaf transcriptome and metabolome were sequenced to explore the genes affecting leaf color change relative to light quality and photoperiod. Our intent was to identify the functional role of key genes in anthocyanin metabolism and to identify the mechanism of molecular regulation of anthocyanins in response to light quality and photoperiod. These results will provide a foundation for further screening light ratios that will regulate anthocyanin synthesis and enhance the resistance of pepper seedlings.

Results

Phenotype identification and pigment content analysis

Pepper leaves under different light treatments had significant color differences (Fig. 1a). Our results showed that pepper leaves treated with continuous blue light were purple, and a small amount of purple was also distributed in peppers under constant white light. In contrast, leaves experienced a significant change to yellow after red light treatment. Pepper growth was remarkable after red light treatment but significantly inhibited after continuous blue light treatment (Fig. 1b). Colorimetric measurements showed that color luminance (ΔL), red (|Δa|), yellow (Δb), and total chromaticity (ΔE) values in pepper leaves after blue light treatment were considerably lower than those of pepper leaves in white or red light treatments, and the continuous blue light treatment (TB) colorimetric parameter was significantly lower than in the other light treatments (Fig. 1c). Chlorophyll a and b under a normal photoperiod were substantially higher than under a continuous photoperiod. However, the highest anthocyanin contents were found in TB (continuous blue light treatment), at 92 ug/g, and in TW (continuous white light treatment), at 40 ug/g (Fig. 1d). This was consistent with changes in leaf color after continuous light treatment, indicating that change in the light environment had great influence on leaf color.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Phenotypic and leaf pigment content analysis of pepper under different light treatment groups.CK: normal light treatment(14 h light/10 h dark); T: continuous light treatment 24 h light/0 h dark. CW: normal white light treatment; CB: normal blue light treatment; normal red light treatment. TW: continuous white light treatment; TB: continuous blue light treatment; TR: continuous blue light treatment. (a) Phenotypic identification of pepper leaves. (b) Analysis of growth indicators of pepper plants; (c) Chroma values of pepper leaves. (d) Photosynthetic pigment content and anthocyanin content. *, P-value < 0.05

Full size image

Metabolome analysis of pepper leaves after different light treatments

To better understand the process of leaf color change in pepper, liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used to analyze anthocyanin metabolites in pepper leaves in each treatment group, and 108 anthocyanin compounds were identified. (Table S1). By subjecting these compounds to unit variance scaling (UV) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), we identified 12 delphinidin compounds, eight cyanidin compounds, eight flavonoids, seven pelargonidin compounds, six malvidin compounds, six petunidin compounds, three peonidin compounds, and one procyanidin compound (Fig. 2a, Table S2).

A total of 12 differential metabolites were compared between TW/CW, TB/CB, and TR/CR, with content values > 5 as the screening condition (Fig. 2b). The results showed significant variation in the levels of delphinidin-3-O-glucoside, delphinidin-3-O-rutinoside, fzelin, kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside, naringenin-7-O-glucoside, rutin, and quercetin-3-O-glucoside under different light conditions (Fig. 2c). The metabolic content in the TB treatment was notably higher than in other light treatments, suggesting that these compounds influence the formation of purple leaves.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Metabolome analysis of pepper leaves under different light treatment groups. (a) Heat map of 51 anthocyanin contents. (b) Venn diagram between different light treatments under the same light quality. (c) histogram of differential metabolite contents

Full size image

Transcriptome analysis of pepper leaves after different light treatments

Illumina NovaSeq6000 sequencing was performed on 18 samples. For each sample, 6.23Gb of clean data was generated, with a Q30 base percentage of 92.94% or greater. Subsequently, the data were summarized, and 527,312,454 clean reads were obtained. After removing low-quality reads and rRNA, the clean reads were compared to the Capsicum_annuum.Zunla-1_v2.0.genome.fa database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/10896), with a comparison rate ranging from 90.49 to 95.89%. A total of 46,108 genes were identified in the sample, of which 35,318 genes were quantified (Table S3). A total of 30,296 and 30,144 genes were quantified in the continuous and normal photoperiodic treatments, respectively. Among them, 974 genes were quantified between TB and TW. Some genes were quantified only under a particular light treatment, with 766, 608, and 539 specific genes under the TW, TB, and TR treatments, respectively. Subsequently, the results of two different treatment conditions showed that the number of genes quantified by TW and TB was 1,724 and 1,737, respectively (Fig. 3a–b).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Statistical analysis of genes identified by transcriptome analysis. (a) Veen of quantified genes under normal light and continuous light conditions in the same light quality. (b) Veen of quantified genes under normal light and continuous light. (c) Venn of differentially expressed genes between different light treatments in the same light quality

Full size image

Analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs)

By comparing gene expression in different light treatments, 16,243 DEGs were identified (Table S4. There were 4,544, 7,936, and 5,023 DEGs in TW/CW, TB/CB, and TR/CR, respectively, and there were 2,049, 4,290, and 2,758 upregulated genes and 2,494, 3,646, and 2,265 downregulated genes in TW/CW, TB/CB, and TR/CR, respectively (Table S5, Supplementary Fig. 1). There were 175 DEGs in each comparison group, while 1,204, 1,713 and 496 genes were significantly different only in TW/CW, TB/CB, and TR/CR, respectively (Fig. 3c). Further analysis showed that anthocyanidin synthesis precursor genes and chlorophyll synthesis genes were significantly different under each treatment. Among them, the expression of PAL (Capana05g002560) and 4CL (Capana03g001365) genes under TB was 1.43-fold and 2.49-fold higher, respectively, than under CB. While chlorophyll synthesis-related genes POR (Capana00g004560) and LIP (Capana02g002261) were higher under CB, these genes exhibited a significant decrease in expression under TB, by 2.15-fold and 2.41-fold, respectively. The differential expression of genes related to anthocyanin synthesis precursors and chlorophyll synthesis may be an important reason for the apparent change in leaf color under continuous blue light treatment.

Functional enrichment analysis for DEGs

The classification of DEGs using the Gene Ontology (GO) database revealed that these DEGs were annotated to one or more GO terms covering three main branches: cellular components, molecular functions, and biological processes. These branches could be further classified into 18, 15, and 21 terms. Analysis of the top 37 GO terms with the largest number of DEGs (Fig. 4a) showed that these DEGs were mainly enriched in membrane, membrane part, cell, and organelle. Binding processes and catalytic activity were predominant in the molecular functional categories. In terms of biological processes, metabolic processes, and cellular processes, single-organism processes had the highest number of DEGs. We found that the degree of enrichment in CC, MF and BP function bars was markedly higher in the TB/CB group than in other light treatments. Abundant DEGs in these GO terms may be one of the reasons for anthocyanin synthesis and accumulation in pepper leaves under TB.

To gain a deeper understanding of the metabolic pathways that play an essential role in anthocyanin synthesis in pepper leaves, we selected the top 20 DEGs from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways for the nine light comparison groups for enrichment analysis (Fig. 4b). The results showed that DEGs were significantly enriched in all light comparison groups, primarily in plant-pathogen interactions, plant-hormone signal transduction, and MAPK signaling pathway-plant. The number of DEGs in the TR/CR group was significantly less than in the TW/CW and TB/CB groups, suggesting that differential expression of genes in the above pathways may lead to leaf color differences under different light quality and photoperiod treatments. We also found that the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway, flavonoid biosynthesis pathway, and circadian rhythm-plant pathway related to anthocyanin biosynthesis were significantly enriched in DEGs in the TB/CB and TW/CW groups, and the genes enriched in these three pathways were upregulated in the TB and TW groups. This suggests that differentially expressed genes in these metabolic pathways may be involved in forming purple colored pepper leaves.

Fig. 4
figure 4

(a) GO analysis of differentially expressed genes. (b) KEGG analysis of differentially expressed genes

Full size image

Gene expression patterns in the anthocyanin pathway

To further investigate the effects of light quality and photoperiod on anthocyanin synthesis in pepper leaves, we analyzed the structural genes and anthocyanin metabolites involved in the anthocyanin synthesis pathway (Fig. 5). The expression of CHS (Capana05g002274, Capana12g000350, and newGene_6924) and CHI (Capana00g002736) in pepper leaves was significantly higher under TB treatment, which resulted in more intermediates, such as naringenin and naringenin-7-O-glucoside, being catalyzed via TB treatment. Meanwhile, the high expression of F3H (Capana02g002586) in the TW and TB treatments led to further catalytic formation of higher amounts of dihydrokaempferol. With dihydrokaempferol as an intermediate in the TW and TB groups, FLS (Capana09g002173 and Capana09g002174), F3’5’H (Capana03g000892), DFR (Capana05g000665), ANS (Capana10g001356), and BZ1 (Capana10g001978, Capana10g001979, and Capana10g001980) were strongly expressed and further catalyzed the synthesis of large amounts of delphinidins. These results suggest that continuous blue and white light irradiation elevated the expression of relevant genes in the anthocyanin synthesis pathway, leading to significant accumulation of delphinidins, which were the main cause of purple color in leaves.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Expression of anthocyanin pathway genes and metabolites. W, white light; B, blue light; R, red light; CK: normal light treatment; T: continuous light treatment. Solid line: generation process; dashed line: generation of subsequent reactions; the red font: substances with content in the anthocyanin pathway; purple box, delphinium derivatives

Full size image

Gene expression patterns in the circadian rhythm-plant pathway

The results of KEGG enrichment analysis showed that pepper leaves under continuous blue light had many DEGs in the circadian rhythm pathway, so we performed an in-depth analysis of genes related to this pathway (Fig. 6a). The expression of the red light receptor PHYB (Capana01g002319), upstream of the circadian pathway, was higher under the continuous blue light treatment and significantly higher than under the normal blue light treatment. In comparison, the expression of the blue light receptor CRY (Capana04g001057) was lower under the blue light treatment and significantly lower than under the other light treatments. Most genes showed significantly higher expression after continuous light treatment compared with normal light treatment, such as LHY (Capana02g002266, Capana02g00058, Capana10g000698, Capana10g001790, and Capana08g000974), SPA1 (Capana17g002184), CHE (Capana06g001366), and COP1 (Capana12g002818). Among them, the five LHY genes detected in pepper leaves were higher after TW, TB, and TR treatments than CW, CB, and CR treatments, with the highest expression after TB treatment and the lowest expression after CB treatment.

To investigate whether plant circadian rhythms played a role in anthocyanin biosynthesis, we analyzed correlations between anthocyanin pathway structural genes and circadian rhythm pathway genes (Fig. 6b). The results showed that COP1 (Capana03g000817) was positively correlated with various anthocyanin structural genes, such as CHS (Capana05g002274), CHI (Capana05g002107), F3’5’H (Capana03g000892), and BZ1 (Capana10g001978) and that LHY (Capana02g000058) was also positively correlated with DFR (Capana05g000665), FLS (Capana10g001337), and F3H (Capana02g002586). This suggests that light induced changes in the expression of structural genes in the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway, leading to changes in anthocyanin content.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Combined analysis of differentially expressed circadian rhythm-plant genes and differentially expressed anthocyanin synthesis genes. (a) Analysis of differentially expressed genes in the circadian rhythm-plant pathway (b) Correlation network between circadian rhythm-related gene and anthocyanin structural gene. Only Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC) ≥ 0.80 or ≤ -0.80 are shown. solid line, positive correlation between genes; dashed line, negative correlation between genes.

Full size image

Transcription factor analysis

The anthocyanin synthesis pathway is regulated primarily by four transcription factor families, namely MYB, bHLH, WD40-repeat, and bZIP. In our study, a total of 16 transcription factor families were identified in pepper leaves under different light treatments, among which the proportions of MYB, bHLH, WD40-repeat, and bZIP were 13.4%, 15.6%, 0.9%, and 2.1%, respectively. (Fig. 7a, Table S6). The DEGs in the MYB, bHLH, and WD40-repeat transcription factor families were further analyzed, with a fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKM) value > 5 as the screening condition. The results showed that the levels of DEGs in the same transcription factor were not identical under different light treatments (Fig. 7b–c). Compared with the normal light treatment, the expression of transcription factors in the continuous light treatment increased; MYB1R1-like (Capana06g000979), MYB48 (Capana11g000757), MYB4-like isoform X1 (Capana01g002912), bHLH143-like (Capana04g000890), and bHLH92-like (Capana03g004551) were significantly upregulated in TW and TB, indicating that the biosynthesis of anthocyanin required higher transcriptional activity. There was no significant difference in the expression of the WD40-repeat protein between treatment groups. At the same time, we also found that the transcription factor Dof zinc finger protein DOF5.5 (CDF1), which regulates anthocyanin synthesis and exhibits highly dynamic changes in response to light (Table S7, Supplementary Fig. 2), showed significantly increased gene expression in the continuous light treatments compared with the normal light treatments, and gene expression was higher in the TB and TW treatments than in the TR treatment.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Analysis of transcription factors associated with the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway. (a) Families of related transcription factors. (b) Heat map of bHLH transcription factors. (c) Heat map of MYB and WD40-repeat transcription factors. Gene expression was scaled using Z-scores of fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped (FPKM) for mean values of three biological replicates in heatmaps. W, White light; B, Blue light; R, Red light. CK indicates normal photoperiod irradiation; T indicates continuous photoperiod irradiation. (d) Correlation network analysis of anthocyanin structural genes with anthocyanin components, MYB TFs. (e) Correlation network analysis of anthocyanin structural genes with anthocyanin components, bHLH TFs. Only Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC) ≥ 0.80 or ≤ -0.80 are shown. solid line, positive correlation between genes; dashed line, negative correlation between genes

Full size image

Further analysis of correlations between the structural genes in the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway and transcription factors was performed (Fig. 7d–e). The results showed that MYB1R1-like, MYB48, bHLH143-like, and bHLH92-like isoform X3 were positively correlated with anthocyanin structural genes F3H (Capana02g002586), FLS (Capana10g001336 and Capana10g001337), and DFR (Capana02g002763 and Capana05g000665) and that MYB4-like isoform X1 (Capana01g002912) was positively correlated with BZ1 (Capana10g001980), FLS (Capana09g002174), F3’5’H (Capana03g000892), and many other structural genes. These transcription factors may be involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis and the regulation of leaf color.

qRT-PCR verification for RNA-Seq

To examine the results of RNA-Seq sequencing, we selected 12 DEGs for qRT-PCR experiments. By comparing the transcriptome abundance (FPKM) obtained from transcriptome sequencing, we found that the qRT-PCR results of the light-treatment-related genes were basically consistent with the trend of FPKM values, which proved that the RNA-Seq assay data in this study were reliable (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Validation and expression analysis of selected genes using qRT-PCR. The X-axis represents leaf samples from different light treatment groups; the left Y-axis represents relative gene expression levels (2−ΔΔCt) analyzed by qRT-PCR; the right Y-axis represents FPKM values obtained by RNA-seq. CK indicates normal photoperiod irradiation; T indicates continuous photoperiod irradiation. The error bars indicate the SDs of three biological replicates. W, White light; B, Blue light; R, Red light. FLS: Capana09g002174;BZ1: Capana10g001980; DFR: Capana05g000665; CHI: Capana00g002736; F3’5’H: Capana03g000892; 3AT: Capana10g000432; ANS: Capana10g001356; LHY: Capana08g000974; bHLH143-like: Capana04g000890; bHLH48 isoform X1: Capana10g002370; MYB48: Capana11g000757; MYB1R1-like: Capana06g000979

Full size image

Discussion

Light has significant regulatory effects on plant growth and development, morphogenesis, physiological processes, material metabolites, and gene expression [40]. Horticultural plants perceive different light qualities through their photoreceptors, and this can cause changes in photosynthetic pigments [41]. It has been shown that eggplant [42], cucumber [43], and lily [44] seedlings have significantly more chlorophyll under red light than under blue light. Meng [9] showed that blue light was better than red light in promoting the synthesis and accumulation of anthocyanins in Gerbera plants. Hoffmann and Hern´andez et al. found that in pepper leaves and tomato seedlings, anthocyanin content increased with an increasing proportion of blue light [45, 46]. Strawberry fruits accumulated anthocyanin glycosides in response to different light qualities; the highest accumulation of anthocyanin glycosides was observed under blue light, while red light treatment caused a weaker induction of anthocyanin glycoside synthesis than blue or white light [15]. Anthocyanin content in European lingonberry fruit was significantly higher after a 24 h light treatment than a 12 h light treatment [47]. In our study, anthocyanin accumulation in pepper leaves was significantly higher after continuous blue light treatment than after red light treatment, while anthocyanin accumulation was also observed in pepper leaves under continuous white light (which contained blue light) treatment, indicating that anthocyanin biosynthesis in pepper leaves is affected by blue light and a long photoperiod.

The main types of anthocyanins present in nature are cornflower pigments, delphinium pigments, and geranium pigments, which are widely present in leaves, flowers, and fruits [48]. Among them, dihydroxy anthocyanidins are responsible for red color in fruits and leaves, and trihydroxy anthocyanidins are responsible for blue–purple color in plants [4, 49]. The highest cornflower pigment content (dihydroxy anthocyanidins) was found in the ‘Red Earth’ grape, while anthocyanidins in purple eggplant were mainly B-ring trihydroxy delphinidin 3-O-rutinoside and delphinidin 3-O-p-coumaroyl glucose [50, 51]. The seven anthocyanins that Luo et al. identified in purple shamrock were all derivatives of delphinidin [52]. In addition, delphinidin-3-O-glucoside and delphinidin-3-O-rutinoside were the predominant anthocyanins in blackcurrant [53]. Anthocyanins can be divided into light-induced and non-light-induced types. The major anthocyanins detected in purple leaves in this experiment included delphinidin-3-O-glucoside and delphinidin-3-O-rutinoside, both of which were significantly elevated after continuous blue and white light treatments, and anthocyanin content in the continuous blue light treatment group was significantly higher than in the other light treatment groups. This indicates that the main types of anthocyanins in pepper leaves were light-induced, continuous blue light irradiation regulated anthocyanin accumulation.

Differences in anthocyanin content may be due to the induction, by different light treatments, of gene expression related to the anthocyanin metabolic pathway. Two types of genes have been shown to influence anthocyanin biosynthesis: One type is a structural gene (an enzyme in the metabolic pathway that catalyzes anthocyanin biosynthesis), and the other type is a transcriptional gene that regulates structural genes [54,55,56,57]. Previous studies have shown that irradiation of cherries with blue or white–blue–green light increased the activity of PAL enzymes, resulting in higher anthocyanin content in the fruit [58]. In blueberry leaves, blue light and red/blue light promoted anthocyanin biosynthesis by inducing the expression of key structural genes and participating in the accumulation of metabolites in the anthocyanin synthesis pathway [59]. Blue light can also promote the expression of MrMYB1 and the anthocyanin synthesis-related structural genes MrCHI, MrF3H, MrF3’H, MrDFR1, MrDFR2, and MrANS in bayberry fruit, thus promoting anthocyanin synthesis [13]. By analyzing the expression of structural genes for anthocyanin synthesis in pepper leaves, we found that the expression of PAL (Capana05g002560), F3H (Capana02g002586), DFR (Capana05g000665), BZ1 (Capana10g001980), and ANS (Capana10g001356) were significantly higher. In addition, F3’5’H is a crucial enzyme for the synthesis of delphinidin in the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway, and the abundance of the F3’5’H gene at the transcriptional level can affect the composition of blue anthocyanin [60]. Yukihisa et al. [61] successfully obtained a new blue–purple rose with delphinidin accumulation by transferring F3’5’H into roses and overexpressing it. In the present experiment, delphinidin was dominant in purple pepper leaves, and the expression of F3’5’H (Capana03g000892) was positively proportional to anthocyanin content under continuous blue light and continuous white light irradiation. Therefore, we speculate that light duration and blue light irradiation induced high expression of F3’5’H, causing pepper leaves to accumulate delphinidin-3-O-rutinoside and delphinidin-3-O-glucoside in large amounts and to change from green to purple.

Transcription factors regulate the structural genes of anthocyanin biosynthesis and promote anthocyanin accumulation in plants [31]. Previous studies have found that MdMYB1 and MdMYBA are key regulatory factors in anthocyanin accumulation and fruit color in apples in response to light induction, and MYB is thought to be related to the regulation of the blue light response [62, 63]. The MYB and bHLH transcription factors in peanut seed coats regulate the structural genes DFR and ANS in the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway [64]. The structural genes F3H and F3’H in the anthocyanin synthesis pathway in ‘RP’ Lobelia are consistent with transcriptional level expression trends in MYB and bHLH [65]. PhJAF13 and PhAN1 are the main bHLH-like regulators of anthocyanin biosynthesis in Petunia; they both interact with PhAN2 to activate DFR expression and PhAN1 can also directly activate DFR expression [66]. Qiu et al. [67] found that the SlAN1 gene in tomato overexpression plants was always co-expressed with SlF3’5’H and SlDFR, thus enhancing anthocyanin accumulation in the tomato pericarp. In the present study, MYB1R1-like, MYB48, MYB4-like isoform X1, bHLH143-like, and bHLH92-like isoform X3 had significantly elevated expression under continuous blue light. Correlation network analysis revealed a strong, positive correlation between these transcription factors and structural anthocyanin synthesis genes F3H, DFR, ANS, and F3’5’H. These results showed that transcription factors caused the accumulation of anthocyanins by regulating the expression of anthocyanin synthesis structural genes. However, whether these transcription factors regulate the expression of anthocyanin structural genes by mediating long-day and blue light responses remains to be verified. At present, a large number of studies have confirmed that the WD40 gene TTG1 regulates the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway with bHLH and MYB transcription complexes [30, 67]. The expression of StWD40, StAN1, and StbHLH was significantly upregulated in red and purple fleshy tubers of potato [68]. In this study, although there was no significant difference in the levels of the WD40-repeat protein between the groups, whether it forms a complex with MYB and bHLH proteins requires further verification.

The anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway has numerous steps and is also tightly regulated by circadian rhythms, forming a complex secondary metabolic network [17]. Three components of the central oscillator of the circadian system, LHY, CCA1, and TOC1, constitute the core negative feedback loop that regulates circadian rhythms in Arabidopsis, rice, and other plants [69,70,71]. COP1, located downstream of the photoreceptor, acts as the main ligase for photomorphogenesis [72], photoperiodic growth [73], and anthocyanin biosynthesis [74] in plants induced by light. Li showed that COP1 proteins are involved in light-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis by binding to the photoreceptor [74]. MdCOP1 interacts with MdMYB1 to regulate apple fruit color, and MdMYB1 is degraded by MdCOP1 in dark conditions [75]. Maier and Hoecker discovered that the COP1/SPA1 complex is an essential suppressor of light signaling, and its mutation leads to excessive accumulation of anthocyanins under normal and high-intensity light [76]. Jiang et al. [77] found that blue light induced a CRY1/CRY2-COP1 interaction in eggplant and promoted the binding of SmMYB to promoters of anthocyanin synthesis structural genes, such as SmCHS and SmDFR. In this study, continuous blue light and continuous white light irradiation activated anthocyanin biosynthesis in pepper leaves, and we found that LHY and COP1 were significantly expressed under continuous blue light irradiation. Our analysis showed that LHY and COP1 were positively correlated with several anthocyanin structural genes, including CHS, CHI, F3H, F3’5’H, DFR, and BZI. Therefore, we concluded that due to the change of light/dark cycle under continuous blue light treatment, the disappearance of dark conditions in the circadian rhythm system of pepper plants led to continuous expression of LHY, and an end to the inhibition of LHY by TOC1. At the same time, continuous light caused COP1 to lose its function of degrading anthocyanin synthesis gene expression and to participate in different ways in photo-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis in pepper leaves. This agrees with previous studies [78, 79]. In conclusion, blue light and a prolonged photoperiod promoted anthocyanin formation by means that are not specific.

Conclusion

Transcriptional analysis revealed 16,243 differentially expressed genes in pepper leaves, including 4,544, 7,936, and 5,023 genes in the TW/CW, TB/CB, and TR/CR treatments, respectively. Identification and functional analysis of DEGs showed that continuous blue light irradiation significantly increased the expression of LHY, COP1, F3H, F3’5’H, and BZ1 genes in the circadian rhythm-plant pathway and anthocyanin metabolism pathway, which affected the expression of genes related to the MYB and bHLH transcription factor families. Correlation analysis showed that LHY, COP1, MYB1R1-like, MYB48, MYB4-like isoform X1, bHLH92-like isoform X3, and bHLH143-like genes were positively correlated with the structural genes in the anthocyanin synthesis pathway. Metabolic analysis showed that delphinidin-3-O-glucoside and delphinidin-3-O-rutinoside accumulated significantly in pepper leaves under continuous blue light irradiation. We observed the regulatory mode of light-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis in pepper leaves (Fig. 9); this mode showed that blue light and 24 h irradiation jointly activated structural genes and transcription factors in the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway of pepper leaves. This study presents a mechanistic basis for anthocyanin anabolic metabolism induced by light quality and photoperiod in pepper leaves and provides a reference for screening plant anthocyanin biosynthesis as regulated by a reasonable light ratio.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Model diagram of light-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis

Full size image

Materials and methods

Plant materials and treatment

Seeds were soaked in warm broth, placed in an artificial climate chamber for germination, and then sown in 50-hole cavity trays where they received 16 h of light at 28 °C and 8 h of darkness at 20 °C. Seedlings received normal water and fertilizer management. When they had four leaves and one heart, seedlings were transplanted to 32-hole seedling trays and then placed under white (W), blue (B), and red (R) light-emitting diodes (LEDs) for 15 d. Photoperiodic setting were as follows: 14 h light and 10 h dark for the normal photoperiodic irradiation group (CK) and 24 h light and 0 h dark for the continuous photoperiodic irradiation group (T), with a diurnal temperature of 28 °C (day) and 20 °C (night) and humidity of 65 ± 5%. There were 40 seedlings in each treatment group and three replications. The photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) was maintained at 200 ± 5 µmol/m2·s in each treatment. The phenotypes of normal white light treatment ( CW ), normal blue light treatment ( CB ), normal red light treatment ( CR ), continuous white light treatment ( TW ), continuous blue light treatment ( TB ), and continuous red light treatment ( TR ) were observed and photographed before and after treatment, and functional pepper leaves were sampled for the subsequent experiments.

Determination of phenotypic indicators of pepper plants

Whole pepper plants were sampled separately after light quality treatment. Plant height was measured with a ruler, stem thickness was measured with vernier calipers (accuracy 0.001 m), roots were washed with water and blotted with paper, and the fresh weight of the whole plant was obtained on a balance with an accuracy of one-tenth of 1%. The fresh samples were oven dried at 60 ℃ for two to three days and then the dry weight of the whole plant was determined. Each treatment was repeated three times, and the average value was taken.

Determination of pigment indicators in pepper leaves

Leaf color differences for the CW, CB, CR, TW, TB, and TR phenotypes were measured using a spectrophotometer (Ts7600, Shenzhen 3nh Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China). Six leaves from the same location on three plants were selected from each treatment group for measurement. The color difference parameters △L (light and dark), △a (red–green), and △b (yellow–blue) were obtained, and the total chromaticity value △E was calculated. Functional leaves with significant phenotypic changes were selected, and three plants were chosen from each treatment group, with three replications. The absorbance values of the sample extracts at A663, A645, and A470 nm were determined using a multifunctional enzyme marker (TECAN/ SPARK), and chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoid contents were calculated after 24 h maceration with 80% acetone (until the material whitened), following the method of Arnon [80]. Total anthocyanin glycosides were extracted via the methanol-hydrochloric acid method. Samples (0.5 g) were ground with liquid nitrogen and incubated in 5 ml of methanol containing 0.1% (v/v) hydrochloric acid at room temperature and protected from light overnight. The absorbance of the sample extracts at 520 and 700 nm was measured using a multifunctional enzyme marker (TECAN/ SPARK) and the anthocyanin content of the samples was measured by pH difference [81].

RNA extraction, library preparation, and sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from tissues using TRI reagent (Sigma Life Science, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, checked for quality by ribonuclease-free agarose gel electrophoresis to avoid possible degradation and contamination, and validated using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Poly(A) mRNA was then isolated using oligo-dT beads (Qiagen, Germany) and later fragmented into short fragments by adding a fragmentation buffer. First-strand cDNA was synthesized via reverse transcription with random hexamer primers using mRNA as a template, and second-strand cDNA was synthesized by adding buffer, RNase H, and DNA polymerase I. The cDNA fragments were purified with a QIA rapid PCR extraction kit and then washed with EB buffer for end-repair poly(a) addition and ligated to sequencing adapters. After agarose gel electrophoresis and extraction of cDNA from the gel, cDNA fragments were purified and enriched by PCR to construct the final cDNA library, which was sequenced using paired-end technology on the Illumina sequencing platform (Illumina-nova6000). Three biological replicates were performed for each strain, resulting in 18 differential gene expression (DGE) libraries.

Transcriptome analysis

After sequencing, raw reads were filtered using Perl software to remove low-quality sequences (more than 50% of a sequence with a base mass below 20 or a sequence containing more than 5% N-base (unknown) reads) and reads containing adapter sequences. Clean reads were mapped to the pepper reference genome using TopHat2, allowing for at most one mismatch [82]. All successfully mapped transcripts were identified using the R package “edgeR” against DEGs, and expression levels were calculated for each gene and normalized to FPKM. The false discovery rate (FDR) was used to determine thresholds for p-values across multiple experiments. Transcripts with an FDR < 0.05 were considered significant and served as significant cut-offs for gene expression differences and for GO and KEGG enrichment analysis. GO terms with corrected P-values < 0.05 and KEGG pathways with P-values < 0.05 were considered significantly enriched for differentially expressed genes. The GO (http://www.geneontology.org/) functional database and KEGG (https://www.genome.jp/kegg/) pathway database were used to perform enrichment analysis on the differential gene set.

Metabolite extraction

Pepper leaf tissue was freeze-dried and ground into powder with a grinder (30 Hz, 1.5 min), and 50 mg powder was extracted in 0.5 mL methanol/water/hydrochloric acid (500:500:1, v/v/v). Then, the extract was vortexed for 5 min, ultrasonicated for 5 min, and centrifuged at 12,000 g for 3 min at 4 °C. The residue was re-extracted by repeating the above steps under the same conditions. The supernatants were collected and filtrated through a membrane filter (0.22 μm, Anpel) before LC-MS/MS analysis [83].

HPLC-MS/MS analysis

LC-MS/MS analysis was performed with an ExionLC™ AD system (SCIEX) from New Genetics Corporation (Beijing, China) coupled to a QTRAP® 6500 + mass spectrometer (SCIEX). Samples were injected into an Xselect HSS T3 (2.1 × 150 mm, 2.5 μm) using a 20 min linear gradient with a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min for the positive/negative polarity mode. The eluents were eluent A (0.1% formic acid in water) and eluent B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile) [84]. The solvent gradients were set as follows: 2% B, 2 min; 2–100% B, 15.0 min; 100% B, 17.0 min; 100–2% B, 17.1 min; and 2% B, 20 min. The QTRAP® 6500 + mass spectrometer was operated in positive polarity mode with a twilight gas of 35 psi, medium collision gas, ion spray voltage of 5500 V, and temperature of 550 °C. The QTRAP® 6500 + mass spectrometer was operated in negative polarity mode with a twilight gas of 35 psi, dielectric collision gas, ion spray voltage of − 4500 V, temperature of 550 °C, ion source gas 1:60, and ion source gas 2:60.

Quantitative real-time PCR

Differentially expressed genes identified by transcriptome analysis were detected by quantitative real-time PCR. qRT-PCR was performed by Taylor et al. [85], using Actin as the internal reference gene, and three replicates of each sample were performed using the Vazyme fluorescence quantification kit (ChamQTM SYBR® qPCR Master Mix, Jiangsu, China) qRT-PCR validation was performed. The relative expression levels of genes were normalized by the 2−ΔΔCt method [86]. qRT-PCR primer sequences are shown in Table S8.

Data availability

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. RNA-Seq data generated in this study are available from the SRA-Archive (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra) with accession number PRJNA980944.

Abbreviations

DEGs:

Differentially expressed genes

CW:

Normal white light irradiation

CB:

Normal blue light irradiation

CR:

Normal red light irradiation

TW:

Continuous white light irradiation

TB:

Continuous blue light irradiation

TR:

Continuous red light irradiation

PAL :

phenylalanin ammonialyase

4CL :

4-coumarate:CoA ligase

CHS :

chalcone synthase

CHI :

chalcone isomerase

F3H :

flavonoid 3-hydroxylase

FLS :

flavonol synthase

F3’H :

flavonoid3’-hydroxylase

F3’5’H :

flavonoid 3’5’-hydroxylase

DFR :

dihydroflavonol 4-reductase

ANS :

anthocyanidin synthase

BZ1 :

anthocyanidin 3-O-glucosyltransferase

3AT :

anthocyanidin 3-0-glucoside 6"O-acyltransferase

LHY :

MYB-related transcription factor LHY

COP1 :

E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RFWD2

SPA1 :

protein suppressor of PHYA-105 1

References

  1. Zou Z, Zou X. Geographical and Ecological Differences in Pepper Cultivation and Consumption in China. Front Nutr. 2021;8:718517.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Tanaka Y, Sasaki N, Ohmiya A. Biosynthesis of plant pigments: anthocyanins, betalains and carotenoids. Plant J. 2008;54:733–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. He J, Giusti MM. Anthocyanins: natural colorants with health-promoting properties. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2010;1:163–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tanaka Y, Ohmiya A. Seeing is believing: engineering anthocyanin and carotenoid biosynthetic pathways. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2008;19:190–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wei J, Wu H, Zhang H, Li F, Chen S, Hou B, et al. Anthocyanins inhibit high glucose-induced renal tubular cell apoptosis caused by oxidative stress in db/db mice. Int J Mol Med. 2018;41:1608–18.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Isaak CK, Petkau JC, Blewett H, O K, Siow YL. Lingonberry anthocyanins protect cardiac cells from oxidative-stress-induced apoptosis. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2017;95:904–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weiss D. Regulation of flower pigmentation and growth: multiple signaling pathways control anthocyanin synthesis in expanding petals. Physiol Plant. 2000;110:152–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zoratti L, Karppinen K, Luengo Escobar A, Häggman H, Jaakola L. Light-controlled flavonoid biosynthesis in fruits. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:534.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Meng X, Xing T, Wang X. The role of light in the regulation of anthocyanin in Gerbera hybrida. Plant Growth Regul. 2004;44:243–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Feng F, Li M, Ma F, Cheng L. Phenylpropanoid metabolites and expression of key genes involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis in the shaded peel of apple fruit in response to sun exposure. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2013;69:54–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li Q, Kubota C. Effects of supplemental light quality on growth and phytochemicals of baby leaf lettuce. Environ Exp Bot. 2009;67:59–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nhut DT, Takamura T, Watanabe H, Okamoto K, Tanaka M. Responses of strawberry plantlets cultured in vitro under superbright red and blue light-emitting diodes (LEDs). Planr Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2003;73:43–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shi L, Cao S, Chen W, Yang Z. Blue light induced anthocyanin accumulation and expression of associated genes in Chinese bayberry fruit. Sci Hort. 2014;179:98–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tao R, Bai S, Ni J, Yang Q, Zhao Y, Teng Y. The blue light signal transduction pathway is involved in anthocyanin accumulation in Red Zaosu pear. Planta. 2018;248:37–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kadomura-Ishikawa Y, Miyawaki K, Noji S, Takahashi A. Phototropin 2 is involved in blue light-induced anthocyanin accumulation in Fragaria x ananassa fruits. J Plant Res. 2013;126:847–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang P, Lu S, Liu Z, Zheng T, Dong T, Jin H, et al. Transcriptomic and metabolomic profiling reveals the effect of LED light quality on Fruit Ripening and Anthocyanin Accumulation in Cabernet Sauvignon grape. Front Nutr. 2021;8:790697.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Pérez-García P, Ma Y, Yanovsky MJ, Mas P. Time-dependent sequestration of RVE8 by LNK proteins shapes the diurnal oscillation of anthocyanin biosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:5249–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Velez-Ramirez AI, van Ieperen W, Vreugdenhil D, Millenaar FF. Plants under continuous light. Trends Plant Sci. 2011;16:310–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sysoeva MI, Markovskaya EF, Shibaeva TG. Plants under Continuous Light: A Review.

  20. Jaakola L, Hohtola A. Effect of latitude on flavonoid biosynthesis in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2010;33:1239–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Camm EL, McCALLUM J, Leaf E, Koupai-Abyazani MR. Cold-induced purpling of Pinus contorta seedlings depends on previous daylength treatment. Plant Cell Environ. 1993;16:761–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Carvalho IS, Cavaco T, Carvalho LM, Duque P. Effect of photoperiod on flavonoid pathway activity in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) Leaves. Food Chem. 2010;118:384–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kopsell D, Lefsrud M, Augé R, Both AJ. Biomass Production and Pigment Accumulation in Kale grown under increasing photoperiods. Dean Kopsell. 2006;41.

  24. Zhou WL, Liu WK, Yang QC. Quality changes in hydroponic lettuce grown under pre-harvest short-duration continuous light of different intensities. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2012;87:429–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou W, Wenke L, Qichang Y. Reducing nitrate content in lettuce by pre-harvest continuous light delivered by red and blue light-emitting diodes. J Plant Nutr. 2013;36.

  26. Wen Y, Zha L, Liu W. Dynamic responses of Ascorbate Pool and Metabolism in Lettuce to Light Intensity at Night Time under continuous light provided by Red and Blue LEDs. Plants (Basel). 2021;10:214.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Li J, Han G, Sun C, Sui N. Research advances of MYB transcription factors in plant stress resistance and breeding. Plant Signal Behav. 2019;14:1613131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Meraj TA, Fu J, Raza MA, Zhu C, Shen Q, Xu D, et al. Transcriptional factors regulate plant stress responses through mediating secondary metabolism. Genes. 2020;11:346.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yin X, Wang T, Zhang M, Zhang Y, Irfan M, Chen L, et al. Role of core structural genes for flavonoid biosynthesis and transcriptional factors in flower color of plants. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2021;35:1214–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gonzalez A, Zhao M, Leavitt JM, Lloyd AM. Regulation of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway by the TTG1/bHLH/Myb transcriptional complex in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant J. 2008;53:814–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu Y, Tikunov Y, Schouten RE, Marcelis LFM, Visser RGF, Bovy A. Anthocyanin biosynthesis and degradation mechanisms in Solanaceous vegetables: a review. Front Chem. 2018;6.

  32. Paz-Ares J, Ghosal D, Wienand U, Peterson PA, Saedler H. The regulatory c1 locus of Zea mays encodes a protein with homology to myb proto-oncogene products and with structural similarities to transcriptional activators. EMBO J. 1987;6:3553–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Koyama K, Ikeda H, Poudel PR, Goto-Yamamoto N. Light quality affects flavonoid biosynthesis in young berries of Cabernet Sauvignon grape. Phytochemistry. 2012;78:54–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cao X, Qiu Z, Wang X, Van Giang T, Liu X, Wang J, et al. A putative R3 MYB repressor is the candidate gene underlying atroviolacium, a locus for anthocyanin pigmentation in tomato fruit. J Exp Bot. 2017;68:5745–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Stommel JR, Lightbourn GJ, Winkel BS, Griesbach RJ. Transcription factor families regulate the anthocyanin Biosynthetic Pathway in Capsicum annuum. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2009;134:244–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Niu S-S, Xu C-J, Zhang W-S, Zhang B, Li X, Lin-Wang K, et al. Coordinated regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in Chinese bayberry (Myrica rubra) fruit by a R2R3 MYB transcription factor. Planta. 2010;231:887–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim S-H, Lee J-R, Hong S-T, Yoo Y-K, An G, Kim S-R. Molecular cloning and analysis of anthocyanin biosynthesis genes preferentially expressed in apple skin. Plant Sci. 2003;165:403–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. D’Amelia V, Aversano R, Batelli G, Caruso I, Castellano Moreno M, Castro-Sanz AB, et al. High AN1 variability and interaction with basic helix-loop-helix co-factors related to anthocyanin biosynthesis in potato leaves. Plant J. 2014;80:527–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Broucke E, Dang TTV, Li Y, Hulsmans S, Van Leene J, De Jaeger G, et al. SnRK1 inhibits anthocyanin biosynthesis through both transcriptional regulation and direct phosphorylation and dissociation of the MYB/bHLH/TTG1 MBW complex. Plant J. 2023;115:1193–213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. McCree KJ. The action spectrum, absorptance and quantum yield of photosynthesis in crop plants. Agric Meteorol. 1971;9:191–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Peng J, Feng Y, Wang X, Li J, Xu G, Phonenasay S, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rate on the photosynthetic pigment, leaf fluorescence characteristics, and yield of indica hybrid rice and their interrelations. Sci Rep. 2021;11:7485.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Di Q, Li J, Du Y, Wei M, Shi Q, Li Y, et al. Combination of red and blue lights improved the growth and development of Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) seedlings by regulating photosynthesis. J Plant Growth Regul. 2021;40:1477–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. su N, Wu Q, Shen ZG, Xia K, Cui J. Effects of light quality on the chloroplastic ultrastructure and photosynthetic characteristics of cucumber seedlings. Plant Growth Regul. 2014;73.

  44. Shang W, Song Y, Zhang C, Shi L, Shen Y, Li X, et al. Effects of light quality on growth, photosynthetic characteristics, and endogenous hormones in in vitro-cultured Lilium plantlets. Hortic Environ Biotechnol. 2023;64:65–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Hoffmann A, Noga G, Hunsche M. Alternating high and low intensity of blue light affects PSII photochemistry and raises the contents of carotenoids and anthocyanins in pepper leaves. Plant Growth Regul. 2016;79.

  46. Hernández R, Eguchi T, Deveci M, Kubota C. Tomato seedling physiological responses under different percentages of blue and red photon flux ratios using LEDs and cool white fluorescent lamps. Sci Hort. 2016;213:270–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Uleberg E, Rohloff J, Jaakola L, Trost K, Junttila O, Häggman H et al. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on yield and Chemical Composition of Northern and Southern Clones of Bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L). J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60.

  48. Jaakola L. New insights into the regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in fruits. Trends Plant Sci. 2013;18:477–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Brugliera F, Tao G-Q, Tems U, Kalc G, Mouradova E, Price K, et al. Violet/blue chrysanthemums–metabolic engineering of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway results in novel petal colors. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013;54:1696–710.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sun L, Li S, Tang X, Fan X, Zhang Y, Jiang J, et al. Transcriptome analysis reveal the putative genes involved in light-induced anthocyanin accumulation in grape Red Globe (V. Vinifera L). Gene. 2020;728:144284.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sun J, Song Y-L, Zhang J, Huang Z, Huo H-X, Zheng J, et al. Characterization and quantitative analysis of phenylpropanoid amides in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) by high performance liquid chromatography coupled with diode array detection and hybrid ion trap time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Agric Food Chem. 2015;63:3426–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Luo B, Chen L, Chen G, Wang Y, Xie Q, Chen X, et al. Transcription and metabolism pathways of anthocyanin in Purple Shamrock (Oxalis triangularis A.St.-Hil). Metabolites. 2022;12:1290.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Ponder A, Hallmann E, Kwolek M, Średnicka-Tober D, Kazimierczak R. Genetic differentiation in Anthocyanin Content among Berry fruits. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2021;43:36–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Niu TQ, Gao ZD, Zhang PF, Zhang XJ, Gao MY, Ji W et al. MYBA2 gene involved in anthocyanin and flavonol biosynthesis pathways in grapevine. Genet Mol Res. 2016;15.

  55. Ranganath KG, Shivashankara KS, Roy TK, Dinesh MR, Geetha GA, Pavithra KC, et al. Profiling of anthocyanins and carotenoids in fruit peel of different colored mango cultivars. J Food Sci Technol. 2018;55:4566–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Karanjalker GR, Ravishankar KV, Shivashankara KS, Dinesh MR, Roy TK, Sudhakar Rao DV. A study on the expression of genes involved in carotenoids and anthocyanins during ripening in Fruit Peel of Green, Yellow, and Red Colored Mango cultivars. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2018;184:140–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. An X-H, Tian Y, Chen K-Q, Wang X-F, Hao Y-J. The apple WD40 protein MdTTG1 interacts with bHLH but not MYB proteins to regulate anthocyanin accumulation. J Plant Physiol. 2012;169:710–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Kokalj D, Zlatić E, Cigić B, Vidrih R. Postharvest light-emitting diode irradiation of sweet cherries (Prunus avium L.) promotes accumulation of anthocyanins. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2019;148:192–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. J Z, S L, H A, X Z, B Z. Integrated transcriptome and metabolome analysis reveals the anthocyanin biosynthesis mechanisms in blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) leaves under different light qualities. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13.

  60. Lo Piero AR. The state of the art in biosynthesis of anthocyanins and its regulation in pigmented Sweet oranges [(Citrus sinensis) L. Osbeck]. J Agric Food Chem. 2015;63:4031–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Katsumoto Y, Fukuchi-Mizutani M, Fukui Y, Brugliera F, Holton TA, Karan M, et al. Engineering of the rose flavonoid biosynthetic pathway successfully generated blue-hued flowers accumulating delphinidin. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007;48:1589–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ban Y, Honda C, Hatsuyama Y, Igarashi M, Bessho H, Moriguchi T. Isolation and functional analysis of a MYB transcription factor gene that is a key regulator for the development of red coloration in apple skin. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007;48:958–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Takos AM, Jaffé FW, Jacob SR, Bogs J, Robinson SP, Walker AR. Light-induced expression of a MYB gene regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis in red apples. Plant Physiol. 2006;142:1216–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Ahmad N, Zhang K, Ma J, Yuan M, Zhao S, Wang M, et al. Transcriptional networks orchestrating red and pink testa color in peanut. BMC Plant Biol. 2023;23:44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Yi D, Zhang H, Lai B, Liu L, Pan X, Ma Z, et al. Integrative Analysis of the Coloring Mechanism of Red Longan Pericarp through Metabolome and Transcriptome analyses. J Agric Food Chem. 2021;69:1806–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Spelt C, Quattrocchio F, Mol JN, Koes R. anthocyanin1 of petunia encodes a basic helix-loop-helix protein that directly activates transcription of structural anthocyanin genes. Plant Cell. 2000;12:1619–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Qiu Z, Wang X, Gao J, Guo Y, Huang Z, Du Y. The Tomato Hoffman’s Anthocyaninless Gene encodes a bHLH transcription factor involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis that is developmentally regulated and Induced by Low Temperatures. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0151067.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Payyavula RS, Singh RK, Navarre DA. Transcription factors, sucrose, and sucrose metabolic genes interact to regulate potato phenylpropanoid metabolism. J Exp Bot. 2013;64:5115–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Carbonell-Bejerano P, Rodríguez V, Royo C, Hernáiz S, Moro-González LC, Torres-Viñals M, et al. Circadian oscillatory transcriptional programs in grapevine ripening fruits. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14:78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Matsuzaki J, Kawahara Y, Izawa T. Punctual Transcriptional Regulation by the Rice Circadian Clock under Fluctuating Field Conditions. The Plant cell. 2015;27.

  71. Carré IA, Kim J-Y. MYB transcription factors in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. J Exp Bot. 2002;53:1551–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Hong SH, Kim HJ, Ryu JS, Choi H, Jeong S, Shin J, et al. CRY1 inhibits COP1-mediated degradation of BIT1, a MYB transcription factor, to activate blue light-dependent gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2008;55:361–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Yu J-W, Rubio V, Lee N-Y, Bai S, Lee S-Y, Kim S-S, et al. COP1 and ELF3 control circadian function and photoperiodic flowering by regulating GI stability. Mol Cell. 2008;32:617–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Li Y-Y, Mao K, Zhao C, Zhao X-Y, Zhang H-L, Shu H-R, et al. MdCOP1 ubiquitin E3 ligases interact with MdMYB1 to regulate light-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis and red fruit coloration in apple. Plant Physiol. 2012;160:1011–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Li J, He Y-J, Zhou L, Liu Y, Jiang M, Ren L, et al. Correction to: transcriptome profiling of genes related to light-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) before purple color becomes evident. BMC Genomics. 2018;19:324.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Maier A, Hoecker U. COP1/SPA ubiquitin ligase complexes repress anthocyanin accumulation under low light and high light conditions. Plant Signal Behav. 2015;10:e970440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Jiang M, Liu Y, Ren L, Lian H, Chen H. Molecular cloning and characterization of anthocyanin biosynthesis genes in eggplant (Solanum melongena L). Acta Physiol Plant. 2016;38.

  78. Kondo S, Tomiyama H, Rodyoung A, Okawa K, Ohara H, Sugaya S, et al. Abscisic acid metabolism and anthocyanin synthesis in grape skin are affected by light emitting diode (LED) irradiation at night. J Plant Physiol. 2014;171:823–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Zoratti L, Sarala M, Carvalho E, Karppinen K, Martens S, Giongo L, et al. Monochromatic light increases anthocyanin content during fruit development in bilberry. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14:377.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Arnon DI. COPPER ENZYMES IN ISOLATED CHLOROPLASTS. POLYPHENOLOXIDASE IN BETA VULGARIS. Plant Physiol. 1949;24:1–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Lee H, Wicker L. Anthocyanin pigments in the skin of Lychee Fruit. J Food Sci. 2006;56:466–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Davidson NM, Oshlack A. Corset: enabling differential gene expression analysis for de novo assembled transcriptomes. Genome Biol. 2014;15:410.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Want EJ, Masson P, Michopoulos F, Wilson ID, Theodoridis G, Plumb RS, et al. Global metabolic profiling of animal and human tissues via UPLC-MS. Nat Protoc. 2013;8:17–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Luo P, Dai W, Yin P, Zeng Z, Kong H, Zhou L, et al. Multiple reaction monitoring-ion pair finder: a systematic approach to transform nontargeted mode to pseudotargeted mode for metabolomics study based on liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2015;87:5050–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Taylor SC, Nadeau K, Abbasi M, Lachance C, Nguyen M, Fenrich J. The Ultimate qPCR experiment: producing publication quality, reproducible data the First Time. Trends Biotechnol. 2019;37:761–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Mestdagh P, Van Vlierberghe P, De Weer A, Muth D, Westermann F, Speleman F, et al. A novel and universal method for microRNA RT-qPCR data normalization. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This study was funded by the Special Project of Biological Seed Industry and Fine and Deep Processing of Agricultural Products (202202AE090031); Yunnan Science and Technology Plan Project (202204BI090004), and Project of Education Department of Hunan Province (Grant No. 22B0229).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yao Zhou and Weisheng Wu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Engineering Research Center of Education Ministry for Germplasm Innovation and Breeding New Varieties of Horticultural Crops, Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biology of Hunan Province, College of Horticulture, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China

    Yao Zhou, Weisheng Wu, Ying Sun, Yiyu Shen, Lianzhen Mao, Yunhua Dai, Bozhi Yang & Zhoubin Liu

Authors
  1. Yao Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Weisheng Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ying Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yiyu Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lianzhen Mao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yunhua Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bozhi Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zhoubin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, B.Y. and Z.L.; methodology, Y.Z.; software, W.W. and L.M.; validation, Y.Z., W.W. and Y.S.; formal analysis, Y.Z.; investigation,Y.S. and Y.D.; data curation, Y.-y.S. and Y.D.; resources, Z.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z. and W.W.; writing—review and editing, B.Y. and Z.L.; visualization, Y.-y.S.; project administration, Z.L.; funding acquisition, Z.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bozhi Yang or Zhoubin Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The plant samples used in this study were grown and collected at Hunan Agricultural University in Hunan, China. The samples were collected in strict accordance with the relevant regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, Y., Wu, W., Sun, Y. et al. Integrated transcriptome and metabolome analysis reveals anthocyanin biosynthesis mechanisms in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) leaves under continuous blue light irradiation. BMC Plant Biol 24, 210 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-04888-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-04888-x

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us