Antenna complexes protect Photosystem I from Photoinhibition
© Alboresi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 23 September 2008
Accepted: 09 June 2009
Published: 09 June 2009
Photosystems are composed of two moieties, a reaction center and a peripheral antenna system. In photosynthetic eukaryotes the latter system is composed of proteins belonging to Lhc family. An increasing set of evidences demonstrated how these polypeptides play a relevant physiological function in both light harvesting and photoprotection. Despite the sequence similarity between antenna proteins associated with the two Photosystems, present knowledge on their physiological role is mostly limited to complexes associated to Photosystem II.
In this work we analyzed the physiological role of Photosystem I antenna system in Arabidopsis thaliana both in vivo and in vitro. Plants depleted in individual antenna polypeptides showed a reduced capacity for photoprotection and an increased production of reactive oxygen species upon high light exposure. In vitro experiments on isolated complexes confirmed that depletion of antenna proteins reduced the resistance of isolated Photosystem I particles to high light and that the antenna is effective in photoprotection only upon the interaction with the core complex.
We show that antenna proteins play a dual role in Arabidopsis thaliana Photosystem I photoprotection: first, a Photosystem I with an intact antenna system is more resistant to high light because of a reduced production of reactive oxygen species and, second, antenna chlorophyll-proteins are the first target of high light damages. When photoprotection mechanisms become insufficient, the antenna chlorophyll proteins act as fuses: LHCI chlorophylls are degraded while the reaction center photochemical activity is maintained. Differences with respect to photoprotection strategy in Photosystem II, where the reaction center is the first target of photoinhibition, are discussed.
Photosynthesis is powered by light absorbed by chlorophyll (Chl) and carotenoid molecules bound to thylakoid membrane proteins. These pigment-binding proteins are organized in two supramolecular complexes: Photosystem (PS) I and II. Each Photosystem is composed of two different moieties: (i) the core complex, responsible for charge separation and the first steps of electron transport and (ii) the peripheral antenna system, which plays a role in light harvesting and transfer of excitation energy to the reaction center. Antenna polypeptides in green algae and plants are all members of a multigenic family of proteins called Lhc (Light harvesting complexes, [1, 2]. PSI antenna system (LHCI) comprises four major proteins, Lhca1-4, while PSII antenna comprises six, Lhcb1-6 . Additional Lhc sequences have been identified, namely Lhca5-6 and Lhcb7-8: the corresponding polypeptides, however, are less expressed and their physiological significance remains unclear [1, 3].
Light is the energy source for photosynthesis but, if the rate of energy absorption exceeds the overall rate of electron transfer, it may cause photo-oxidation damages . PSII is generally considered as the major target of this phenomenon (photoinhibition) as it is less stable than PSI under strong light treatments [5, 6]. Several photoprotection mechanisms activated with different timescales, such as NPQ (Non Photochemical Quenching), xanthophyll cycle and acclimation were shown to be involved in PSII photoprotection. Interestingly, members of the multigenic family of antenna proteins have been shown to be involved to some extent in all these mechanisms [7–14]. A growing set of evidences, thus, supports the idea that antenna proteins, at least those associated to PSII, play a dual role and are involved both in light harvesting and photoprotection .
In contrast PSI is generally believed to be less sensitive to light stress  and its photoprotection mechanisms were less investigated. However, several recent evidences showed that PSI can also be targeted by photoinhibition, especially under chilling conditions and when the linear electron transport chain is unbalanced [15–20]. PSI photoprotection has been suggested to be mainly mediated by oxygen scavenging enzymes (e.g., superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase) which efficiently detoxify reactive species produced at the reducing side of Photosystem I . A decreased ability of these enzymes to scavenge ROS at low temperatures was proposed to be the reason of the major PSI photo-sensitivity in chilling conditions . In addition, it was shown that PSI reaction centre itself is very efficient in dissipating energy as heat [22–26].
Despite the sequence similarity with PSII antenna polypeptides, a possible role of PSI antenna polypeptides in photoprotection was never completely proven [27–30]. Recent evidences, however, suggested that PSI antenna might play a more relevant role than generally believed. In fact, Lhca depleted plants showed a large reduction in their fitness in a natural environment: all genotypes produced less seeds than WT under sunlight and the largest differences were observed in the case of ΔLhca2 and ΔLhca4 mutants . Moreover, it was shown that carotenoids bound to Lhca polypeptides are very efficient in quenching Chl triplets, suggesting that the pigments bound to these complexes are well protected from radiation damages [32, 33].
In this work we analyzed the role of LHCI polypeptides in photoprotection, using a combination of in vivo and in vitro approaches: we first compared the phenotype of plants depleted in individual Lhca polypeptides under strong illumination [34, 35] and observed that reactive oxygen species (ROS) production was positively correlated with the reduction in PSI antenna size, suggesting a role of LHCI chlorophyll-proteins in photoprotection. This hypothesis was confirmed by experiments performed in vitro on isolated complexes, confirming that the in vivo phenotype was due to differences in the composition of the PSI-LHCI complexes. We also show that antenna complexes are the first target in PSI photoinhibition, suggesting they act as safety fuses in PSI photoprotection. When radiation damages cannot be avoided, their targeting to the LHCI antenna prevents damages at the reaction center, whose catalytic activity is thus stable even under high light conditions.
Lhca depleted plants are defective in photoprotection
Despite their name, light harvesting complexes (Lhc) are not only involved in light capture but they also play a relevant role in photoprotection. Evidences supporting this idea, however, have been almost exclusively obtained for PSII antenna polypeptides, while the physiological role of Lhc complexes associated to PSI is still poorly understood. We analyzed plants depleted in Lhca proteins, whose absence drove to destabilization of the PSI antenna system at different extents, depending on the targeted gene product [34, 35]. The largest effect was observed upon deletion of Lhca4, followed by Lhca2 and Lhca3. In the case of ΔLhca1 the effect was the weakest. However, this last statement must be considered as provisional since the only available mutant is a leaky allele, which still retains a significant levels of Lhca1 . Functional and biochemical analyses showed that the PSI antenna size in these genotypes was in the following order: Δa4 < Δa2 = Δa3 < Δa1 [34, 35]. In contrast to previous work, we used here a KO plant for Lhca2, instead of the previously characterized antisense plants . However, as described in Additional file 1, biochemical characterization of PSI samples from these plants showed very similar results to data obtained on antisense Lhca2 plants.
Similar experiments were performed with whole plants instead of leaf disks: again, an increased bleaching and MDA production was observed in mutants, even if, due to the unavailability of a large 4°C growth chamber, high light treatments were performed at 22°C for a longer time (4 days) in order to obtain comparable MDA productions. Thereafter we focused our experiments on detached leaves for two main reasons: first, in the long term we could not avoid the activation of an acclimative response in plants and thus the activation of photoprotective mechanisms which might mask the effect of Lhca depletion. As an example, during acclimation the synthesis of several antioxidant molecules such as carotenoids, vitamin E, anthocyanins and other flavonoids might be differentially induced . Second, since PSI is more sensitive to photoinhibition at chilling temperatures, low temperatures are more suited to analyze photoprotection mechanisms in this supercomplex [16, 17].
PSI particles with reduced antenna show increased photosensitivity
The observation that PSI with reduced antenna is less stable in response to high light treatment suggests that antenna proteins are indeed relevant in photoprotection of the complex. In order to confirm this result, we repeated the same photobleaching experiments by comparing PSI-LHCI particles with the PSI core and LHCI moieties purified from WT thylakoids. Results in figure 2B show that, consistent with the above results, PSI core is less resistant to illumination with respect to the whole PSI-LHCI supercomplex. This observation thus confirms the role of the antenna system in protecting PSI from excess illumination damages. However, data in figure 2B also show that this protecting effect is not due to an intrinsically higher resistance of LHCI: in fact, isolated LHCI is even more sensitive to high light than the PSI reaction center. To confirm this, we measured the bleaching kinetics of PSI core + LHCI mixed together, which showed an intermediate behavior with respect to isolated PSI core and LHCI (not shown).
These experiments were done using the same P700 concentrations, exploiting known PSI to Chl stoichiometries , in order to evidence differences between a PSI core with or without antenna complexes. We nevertheless verified that differences in concentration were not affecting the results: in experiments using equivalent Chl amounts isolated core and antenna moieties were more sensitive to high light treatment with respect to whole PSI-LHCI complexes (see Additional file 3).
LHCI is effective in protecting Photosystem I catalytic activity
In order to analyze the possibility that the antenna system actually plays a role in this process, the same analysis was performed on PSI particles purified from ΔLhca4 plants. In this case, we observed a faster Chl bleaching, as already pointed out, but also a faster decrease in concentration of photo-oxidizable P700 concentration, clearly showing that the reduction in antenna size reduces its protection from Chl bleaching but also from impairment of charge separation capacity. Moreover, in ΔLhca4 mutant photo-oxidizable P700 decreases together with Chl bleaching starting from the very beginning of the light treatment. These results clearly demonstrate that the antenna complex is needed in order to localize radiation damages far from the PSI reaction center. The relevance of the antenna is evident from data in the inset of figure 3B: while in WT photo-oxidizable P700 concentration is substantially unaffected after 60 minutes of light treatment, in ΔLhca4 plants in the same time period it is already reduced by 20%. Thus in most physiological conditions, the presence of the antenna prevents P700 from undergoing significant damages.
LHCI is the first target of PSI photoinhibition
Results presented so far suggested that P700 Chls are not the first targets in PSI photoinhibition. In order to identify what these targets are, we analyzed in more detail the modification occurring in the PSI-LHCI super-complex during the strong illumination treatment.
Densitometric quantification of the different bands, reported in figure 4B, confirms this view. PSI-LHCI constantly decreases during the light treatment. In a first phase this is correlated with the increase in PSI-LHCI* and PSI core populations, while free LHCI is hardly detectable. Thus, LHCI bound Chls are preferentially degraded in this phase, while PSI-LHCI* and PSI core are affected only later.
Light effects on polypeptides composition were also analyzed by loading on a SDS-PAGE samples at different stages of the light treatment. As shown in figure 4C, light induced protein degradation is observed as several bands become fainter in the SDS-PAGE pattern. Moreover, degradation products become visible as smeared bands. Lhca polypeptides are the most sensitive to this treatment: densitometric analysis showed a significant reduction (> 20%) of Lhca polypeptides after t3 (90 min). Instead, PSI core polypeptides like PsaB, which is known to be a main target of PSI core upon illumination , are more resistant to light treatment and show protein degradation only at t5 (165 min). Other PSI core polypeptides like PsaD and PsaF are even more stable and show relevant degradation only after t7 (285 min). By densitometric analysis we also compared the degradation rate of the different antenna polypeptides, but the differences were too small to be significant. This suggests that there are little differences in light susceptibility among the Lhca polypeptides and they are all affected simultaneously or in a very fast succession. Mutant phenotypes are thus rather due to differences in antenna size than due to the absence of a specific polypeptide.
LHCI polypeptides protects PSI from excess light
In this work we analyzed the phenotype under high light of plants depleted in Lhca polypeptides. These mutants have a different LHCI content, ranging from around 5–10% of WT levels in ΔLhca4, 20–30% in ΔLhca2-3 to 50–60% in ΔLhca1 plants [34, 35]. Plants with the strongest depletion in LHCI polypeptides showed higher lipid peroxide formation quantified as MDA derivates .
If we compare this measure with literature data on several mutants affecting photoprotection, although plant treatments are not equivalent, we observed that the phenotype of Lhca depleted plants is strong. In contrast, several mutants in the carotenoid biosynthesis or PsbS mutant, although affected in well known photoprotection mechanisms do not show significant differences in MDA production . Consistent with this hypothesis of a relevant role of LHCI in photoprotection, plant fitness experiments in a natural environment showed that ΔLhca4 plants had the strongest phenotype with respect to all other Lhca or Lhcb depleted plants or even PsbS less plants .
The role of Lhca polypeptides in photoprotection has been confirmed by in vitro experiments. Both PSI particles isolated from ΔLhca4 depleted plants and purified PSI core showed a faster Chl bleaching under high light compared to PSI-LHCI WT particles. Isolated LHCI showed an even lower resistance to high light, implying that its photoprotective effect requires the interaction with PSI core: PSI-LHCI supercomplex, in fact, is more resistant to light treatment than both individual moieties.
In this respect it is worth reminding that PSI-LHCI supercomplex is peculiar because it contains a pigment complement, constituted by "Gap" and "Linker" Chls, which are bound at the interface between the core and the antenna moiety [41, 46]. These Chls are specific of PSI and were shown to be implied in the linkage between core and antenna and in stabilizing the supercomplex structure . Data presented here add new information to the picture showing that these pigments are also relevant for its photoprotection.
LHCI acts as a safety valve for PSI activity
PSI with reduced antenna or isolated PSI core showed a lower resistance than PSI-LHCI, both in vivo and in vitro. The presence of the antenna system strongly influences the extent of radiation damage but also its localization. In fact, antenna complexes are the first target of radiation damages in PSI-LHCI: figure 4 is very clear in this respect, showing that during the first part of light treatment PSI core is stable while only the antenna moiety is affected. These results are also consistent with previous results showing the antenna sensitivity to high light in PSI, both in vivo  and in vitro [28, 48].
This preferential degradation of LHCI upon illumination is effective in protecting PSI catalytic activity: during the first phase of light treatment, concentration of photo-oxidizable P700 is maintained despite a significant degradation of a fraction of Chl molecules. The LHCI role in PSI photoprotection is thus dual: its presence not only increases the overall resistance to high light, but also changes the localization of the radiation damage far from the reaction center, acting like a safety valve. In contrast to PSII, it appears that the subunits suffering radiation damages are antenna subunits while the reaction center is more stable.
It is interesting to underline that around 30% of Chls were already bleached before a significant decrease in P700 concentration was observed. Such a large Chl bleaching is very difficult to observe in leaves and, although this figure cannot be directly transferred in vivo, it suggests that in most physiological conditions PSI activity is efficiently protected.
Consistent with the hypothesis that radiation damage to the PSI core is a rare event, PSI repair mechanisms are known to be very slow: even after several days, recovery from PSI core photoinhibition is still incomplete [42, 49, 50]. Furthermore, recovery requires complete degradation of photoinhibited PSI and its complete re-synthesis , making the process energetically demanding. We may thus hypothesize that, in the case of PSI-LHCI super complex, the strategy evolved was to target photo-oxidation damage to the LHCI moiety to save the reaction center. This degradation also causes a decrease in PSI antenna size thus reducing light absorption efficiency and thus further decreasing the probability of damages. When the whole photosynthetic electron transport chain is considered, the strong resistance of PSI catalytic activity also appears well suited to prevent over-reduction of the plastoquinone pool and consequent PSII saturation and photoinhibition.
In line with the proposed role of LHCI as safety valve, in two previous studies the functional antenna size in PSI was evaluated in vivo after photoinhibitory treatment affecting PSI. Both studies show that a higher light intensity was required to oxidize P700, suggesting a reduction of the antenna proteins associated to PSI [42, 50].
The role of "red absorption forms"
This ability of LHCI to work as a safety valve for PSI is likely due to the presence in this antenna of the red absorption forms. These Chls are peculiar since they have energy level lower with respect to all other pigments in Photosystem I, including the reaction centre P700. Even at room temperature, 90% of the energy is concentrated in these chlorophylls before being transferred to PSI reaction centre . This energy distribution explains why light in excess is affecting the antenna moiety rather than the reaction center: the probability of generating Chl triplets by intersystem crossing is clearly higher here than anywhere else in the complex.
Red absorption forms, moreover, have some properties which make them particularly well photoprotected from excess light. In fact they have lower fluorescence yield with respect to all other antenna bound Chls, meaning they are particularly efficient in thermal dissipation of excess energy . Furthermore, Chl triplets eventually generated by red Chls are efficiently quenched by nearby carotenoids . This efficiency in Chl triplets quenching was also shown to be directly dependent on the presence of red forms and to be less efficient in a mutant depleted in red forms . The presence of red Chls in PSI antenna is thus relevant for both photoprotective mechanisms evidenced in this work since (i) they contribute to increase the resistance of antenna proteins to high light and (ii) they localize radiation damages far from the reaction center.
Differences and similarities in photoprotection strategies between PSI and PSII
Photosystem II is known to experience radiation damages even at very low illumination intensities. This is due to the fact that 1O2 is generated by charge recombination from P680+ Pheo- and that effective protection from carotenoids is lacking. In fact, carotenoid molecules in PSII core structure are located too far from P680 to be able to efficiently quench the Chl triplets generate by charge recombination . On the other hand, if the carotenoids were closer, they would be immediately oxidized by P680+ because of its strong oxidizing potential . For this reason PSII reaction center is poorly protected from the action of singlet oxygen and an efficient mechanism of PSII repair has evolved in order to maintain the photochemical capacity. When light is in excess, the D1 protein is rapidly degraded and re-synthesized to reestablish a fully active PSII reaction center [6, 55, 56]. A similar mechanism is not known for PSI: after radiation damages its recovery requires several days [42, 49, 50]. Furthermore, the repair from photoinhibition does not require the turnover of a single polypeptide, as in the case of D1, but involves degradation and re-synthesis of the whole PSI complex.
Although the mechanisms and localization are different, the D1 protein might also be considered as a safety fuse: in fact, once D1 is degraded, not only charge separation but also singlet oxygen production are stopped thus protecting the remaining PSII core structures from oxidation damage and photobleaching . Thus, it appears that in both cases (PSI and PSII) some sacrificial proteins exist functioning like a safety fuse for the rest of the structure. In the case of PSI these are the antenna chlorophyll-proteins while in the case of PSII is the D1 protein of the reaction center to play this role.
It is worth mentioning that P700+ is not such a strong oxidizer as P680+, and no massive charge recombination has been reported in PSI. This is probably one major reason explaining why different photoprotection strategies evolved in PSI and PSII. It is interesting to point out that, despite the differences, in both cases the antenna system is fundamental in photoprotection. In PSII antenna function needs to be regulated: in low light conditions light harvesting capacity must be preponderant while in high light quenching mechanisms are activated . Without such a regulation, PSII reaction center would be less efficient if associated to a constitutively quenched antenna, as suggested by the observation that plants over-expressing PsbS and accumulating zeaxanthin showed a reduced growth in limiting light conditions . On the other side, PSI can afford being associated with an antenna with constitutive low fluorescence yield without losing efficiency in low light conditions .
The stability of PSI catalytic activity under high light also explains partially why PSII is widely considered as the only target of photoinhibition. In fact, early work in this field (reviewed in ) mainly evaluated the reaction center capacity of charge separation: for PSII this is easily affected by light treatments, while for PSI this occurs only under extreme conditions, as discussed above. A further possible explanation for the underestimation of LHCI role in photoprotection is also the fact that photoprotection capacity is not strongly modulated according to environmental conditions but rather intrinsic to the system. In fact, at present no modulation of light harvesting or fluorescence quenching efficiency was ever shown within the PSI antenna. Even the number of Lhca antennas associated with PSI is not reduced in high light conditions: four polypeptides, one copy of each Lhca1, 2, 3 and 4 polypeptide was in fact found associated to PSI in plants acclimated to different growing conditions, different from what was observed in the case of PSII antenna polypeptides .
In this work we showed that the presence of the antenna system is effective in PSI photoprotection: if treated with strong illumination, PSI with reduced antenna showed a lower resistance than PSI-LHCI, both in vivo and in vitro. Antenna polypeptides not only increase the resistance of the supercomplex to light damages but also act as safety valves. Thanks to the presence of red forms, energy is concentrated far from the reaction centre, where any possible radiation damage will not affect catalytic activity.
Plant material and growth conditions
Wild type Arabidopsis thaliana, lhca1 (KO line, kindly provided by Prof. S. Jansson, Umea Sweden), lhca3 (antisense line NASC ID: N3892) and lhca4 mutants (T-DNA knockout line SALK-127744) are in the Col0 background, as described by [34, 36]. lhca2 mutant (JIC Gene Trap line NASC ID: N101690;  was isolated in a Lansdberg erecta (Ler) background (see Additional file 1). For growth under controlled conditions six seeds from different Arabidopsis thaliana genotypes were sown in small pots and then stratified for 48 h at 4°C in the dark: Seeds were then transferred for 6–8 weeks in a growth chamber (22°C day/18°C night and 60% relative humidity) under a light cycle of 16 h of light (100 μE m-2 s-1) and 8 h of dark.
Lipid peroxidation Assay
The thiobarbituric acid (TBA) test, which determines malondialdehyde (MDA) as an end product, was used to analyze lipid peroxidation [37, 59]. Briefly, detached leaves were treated with strong light (1000 μmol m-2s-1) at 4°C for 9 hours. Samples were harvested and then immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Photo-oxidative stress was assessed by measuring MDA formation, as indirect quantification of lipid peroxidation. MDA was quantified as MDA-(TBA)2 by HPLC as described .
Purification of the native complexes
Unstacked thylakoid membranes were isolated from Arabidopsis thaliana leaves and used for PSI-LHCI particles purification. PSI-LHCI complex and its PSI core and LHCI moieties were then purified as previously reported [35, 51].
Kinetics of PSI-LHCI, PSI and LHCI photobleaching were measured by treating samples with 1600 μmol m-2s-1 of white light (provided by a Schott KL1500 LCD) in a 1 cm cuvette water cooled at 10°C. Initial and maximal OD (at 435 nm) was 0.8 for wild-type PSI-LHCI particles, while average OD in whole visible spectra is 0.25. For figure 2 and 3, PSI complexes isolated from Lhca depleted plants, PSI core and LHCI, concentration was adjusted to an equivalent number of PSI reaction centers, by using the previously determined mutants antenna sizes [34, 35]. Maximum OD employed are respectively 0.54 and 0.23 for isolated PSI core and LHCI. Experiments were also performed with equivalent Chl concentration (OD435 0.8 for all samples). A different photobleaching set-up was instead employed for gel electrophoresis and P700 determinations, since these analyses required larger sample amounts. PSI-LHCI samples (max OD435 2 per cm) in a 96 well plate were treated with 1000 μE m-2s-1 from a white halogen lamp. The microtiter plate was kept in melting ice in order to control the temperature at 4°C. Optical length in the microtiter was 0.5 cm. For each point of the time course, samples from three different wells of the plate were pooled together and used for gel electrophoresis, pigment analyses and P700 measurements.
SDS PAGE Electrophoresis
SDS-PAGE electrophoresis was performed as  with the modifications described in : a acrylamide/bis-acrylamide ratio of 75:1 and a total concentration of acrylamide + bis-acrylamide of 4.5% and 15.5% were employed respectively for the stacking and running gel. 6 M urea was also incorporated into the running gel.
Spectroscopy and pigment analysis
HPLC analysis was as in . Chlorophyll to carotenoid ratio and Chl a/b ratio were independently measured by fitting the spectrum of acetone extracts with the spectra of individual purified pigments .
Deriphat PAGE analysis
Non-denaturing Deriphat-PAGE was performed following the method developed by  with the following modifications: the stacking gel contained 3.5% (w/v) acrylamide (38:1 acrylamide/bis-acrylamide). The resolving gel was obtained with an acrylamide concentration gradient from 4.5 to 11.5% (w/v) stabilized by a glycerol gradient from 8% to 16%. 12 mM Tris and 48 mM Glycine pH 8.5 were also included in the gel. In the case of PSI-LHCI particles the equivalent of 10 μg of chlorophyll were loaded in each lane.
Measurement of P700 redox kinetics
Functional P700 concentration in samples during the photobleaching experiments was estimated by measuring the light induced P700+ absorption at 435 nm  using a laser based Joliot type spectrophotometer . The measuring light pulse of 5 ns time-duration is produced by a Surelite Q-switched Nd:YAG laser (Continuum) which pumps a Surelite OPO (BBO I crystal, Continuum) to produce coherent, broadband tunable radiation from 420 to 590 nm. Excitation light is provided by dye laser emission (DCM 650) in a home built dye cell which is pumped by a second harmonic Minilite Nd:YAG laser (Continuum). The excitation pulses have an intensity of ~1.5 mJ, wavelength 640 ± 10 nm and duration of 5 ns. Three Schott BG39 (3 mm) optical filters and a low pass dielectric filter (transmission less than 10-3 at 600 nm) are placed in front of each detector. Samples were placed in 2 mm cuvettes in front of each detector. The measurements were performed at room temperature. 1 mM ascorbate and 20 μM 5-methyl phenazonium methyl sulfate (PMS), were added to each sample just before measuring to assure P700 reduction in the dark. Data were fitted from 30 light induced absorption changes obtained in the time range from 1 ms to 1425 ms by a single decaying exponential function, the so obtained amplitude was taken as relative quantification of photo-oxidizable P700.
- The abbreviations used are:
- Lhca (b):
light harvesting complex of Photosystem I (II)
- LHCI (II):
antenna complex of Photosystem I(II)
- PSI (II):
Photosystem I (II)
Reactive Oxygen Species
We would like to thank Prof. R. Bassi (University of Verona, Italy) for useful discussions and Dr. Stefano Caffarri (LGBP, UMR 6191, CEA-CNRS-Université de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France) for the help in MDA analysis. We thank Dr Hoai-Nam Truong (INRA Centre de Dijon, France) for language revision. AA was supported by the European Community's Human Potential Program contract HPRN-CT-2002-00248 (PSICO) and by a CEA fellowship. GMG acknowledge Murst (PRIN project 2005050270) and the FISR grants "Idrobio" for financial support
- Jansson S: A guide to the Lhc genes and their relatives in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 1999, 4: 236-240. 10.1016/S1360-1385(99)01419-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alboresi A, Caffarri S, Nogue F, Bassi R, Morosinotto T: In silico and biochemical analysis of Physcomitrella patens photosynthetic antenna: identification of subunits which evolved upon land adaptation. PLoS ONE. 2008, 3: e2033-10.1371/journal.pone.0002033.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Klimmek F, Sjodin A, Noutsos C, Leister D, Jansson S: Abundantly and rarely expressed Lhc protein genes exhibit distinct regulation patterns in plants. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140: 793-804. 10.1104/pp.105.073304.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barber J, Andersson B: Too Much of a Good Thing – Light Can Be Bad for Photosynthesis. Trends Biochem Sci. 1992, 17: 61-66. 10.1016/0968-0004(92)90503-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Powles SB: Photoinhibition of photosynthesis induced by visible light. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. 1984, 35: 15-44. 10.1146/annurev.pp.35.060184.000311.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aro E-M, Virgin I, Andersson B: Photoinhibition of Photosystem-2 – Inactivation, Protein Damage and Turnover. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993, 1143: 113-134. 10.1016/0005-2728(93)90134-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li XP, Muller-Moule P, Gilmore AM, Niyogi KK: PsbS-dependent enhancement of feedback de-excitation protects photosystem II from photoinhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 15222-15227. 10.1073/pnas.232447699.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Elrad D, Niyogi KK, Grossman AR: A major light-harvesting polypeptide of photosystem II functions in thermal dissipation. Plant Cell. 2002, 14: 1801-1816. 10.1105/tpc.002154.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Horton P, Ruban A: Molecular design of the photosystem II light-harvesting antenna: photosynthesis and photoprotection. J Exp Bot. 2005, 56: 365-373. 10.1093/jxb/eri023.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Szabo I, Bergantino E, Giacometti GM: Light and oxygenic photosynthesis: energy dissipation as a protection mechanism against photo-oxidation. EMBO Rep. 2005, 6: 629-634. 10.1038/sj.embor.7400460.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pascal AA, Liu Z, Broess K, van Oort B, Van Amerongen H, Wang C, Horton P, Robert B, Chang W, Ruban A: Molecular basis of photoprotection and control of photosynthetic light-harvesting. Nature. 2005, 436: 134-137. 10.1038/nature03795.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dall'Osto L, Caffarri S, Bassi R: A Mechanism of Nonphotochemical Energy Dissipation, Independent from PsbS, Revealed by a Conformational Change in the Antenna Protein CP26. Plant Cell. 2005, 17: 1217-1232. 10.1105/tpc.104.030601.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ballottari M, Dall'Osto L, Morosinotto T, Bassi R: Contrasting behavior of higher plant photosystem I and II antenna systems during acclimation. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282: 8947-8958. 10.1074/jbc.M606417200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Johnson MP, Havaux M, Triantaphylides C, Ksas B, Pascal AA, Robert B, Davison PA, Ruban AV, Horton P: Elevated zeaxanthin bound to oligomeric LHCII enhances the resistance of Arabidopsis to photooxidative stress by a lipid-protective, antioxidant mechanism. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282: 22605-22618. 10.1074/jbc.M702831200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Terashima I, Funayama S, Sonoike K: The Site of Photoinhibition in Leaves of Cucumis-Sativus l at Low-Temperatures Is Photosystem-I, Not Photosystem-Ii. Planta. 1994, 193: 300-306. 10.1007/BF00192544.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sonoike K, Terashima I: Mechanism of Photosystem-I Photoinhibition in Leaves of Cucumis-Sativus l. Planta. 1994, 194: 287-293. 10.1007/BF01101690.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tjus SE, Moller BL, Scheller HV: Photosystem I is an early target of photoinhibition in barley illuminated at chilling temperatures. Plant Physiol. 1998, 116: 755-764. 10.1104/pp.116.2.755.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ivanov AG, Morgan RM, Gray GR, Velitchkova MY, Huner NPA: Temperature/light dependent development of selective resistance to photoinhibition of photosystem I. FEBS Lett. 1998, 430: 288-292. 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00681-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tjus SE, Scheller HV, Andersson B, Moller BL: Active oxygen produced during selective excitation of photosystem I is damaging not only to photosystem I, but also to photosystem II. Plant Physiol. 2001, 125: 2007-2015. 10.1104/pp.125.4.2007.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scheller HV, Haldrup A: Photoinhibition of photosystem I. Planta. 2005, 221: 5-8. 10.1007/s00425-005-1507-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Asada K: THE WATER-WATER CYCLE IN CHLOROPLASTS: Scavenging of Active Oxygens and Dissipation of Excess Photons. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999, 50: 601-639. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.601.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nuijs AM, Shuvalov VA, van Gorkom HJ, Plijter JJ, Duysens LNM: Picosecond absorbance difference spectroscopy on the primary reactions and the antenna-excited states in photosystem I particles. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1986, 850: 310-318. 10.1016/0005-2728(86)90186-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Byrdin M, Rimke I, Schlodder E, Stehlik D, Roelofs TA: Decay kinetics and quantum yields of fluorescence in photosystem I from Synechococcus elongatus with P700 in the reduced and oxidized state: Are the kinetics of excited state decay trap-limited or transfer-limited?. Biophys J. 2000, 79: 992-1007. 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76353-3.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bukhov NG, Carpentier R: Measurement of photochemical quenching of absorbed quanta in photosystem I of intact leaves using simultaneous measurements of absorbance changes at 830 nm and thermal dissipation. Planta. 2003, 216: 630-638.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rajagopal S, Bukhov NG, Tajmir-Riahi HA, Carpentier R: Control of energy dissipation and photochemical activity in photosystem I by NADP-dependent reversible conformational changes. Biochemistry. 2003, 42: 11839-11845. 10.1021/bi034949k.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rajagopal S, Joly D, Gauthier A, Beauregard M, Carpentier R: Protective effect of active oxygen scavengers on protein degradation and photochemical function in photosystem I submembrane fractions during light stress. FEBS J. 2005, 272: 892-902. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2004.04512.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mukerji I, Sauer K: Temperature-dependent steady-state and picosecond kinetic fluorescence measurements of a photosystem I preparation from spinach. PhotosynthesisPlant Biology. Edited by: Briggs WR. 1989, New York: Alan R. Liss, 8: 105-122.Google Scholar
- Hui Y, Jie W, Carpentier R: Degradation of the photosystem I complex during photoinhibition. Photochem Photobiol. 2000, 72: 508-512. 10.1562/0031-8655(2000)072<0508:DOTPIC>2.0.CO;2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Morosinotto T, Castelletti S, Breton J, Bassi R, Croce R: Mutation analysis of Lhca1 antenna complex. Low energy absorption forms originate from pigment-pigment interactions. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 36253-36261. 10.1074/jbc.M205062200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Slavov C, Ballottari M, Morosinotto T, Bassi R, Holzwarth AR: Trap-limited charge separation kinetics in higher plant photosystem I complexes. Biophys J. 2008, 94: 3601-3612. 10.1529/biophysj.107.117101.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ganeteg U, Kulheim C, Andersson J, Jansson S: Is each light-harvesting complex protein important for plant fitness?. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134: 502-509. 10.1104/pp.103.033324.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carbonera D, Agostini G, Morosinotto T, Bassi R: Quenching of chlorophyll triplet states by carotenoids in reconstituted Lhca4 subunit of peripheral light-harvesting complex of photosystem I. Biochemistry. 2005, 44: 8337-8346. 10.1021/bi050260z.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Croce R, Mozzo M, Morosinotto T, Romeo A, Hienerwadel R, Bassi R: Singlet and Triplet State Transitions of Carotenoids in the Antenna Complexes of Higher-Plant Photosystem I. Biochemistry. 2007, 46: 3846-3855. 10.1021/bi602531k.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Klimmek F, Ganeteg U, Ihalainen JA, van Roon H, Jensen PE, Scheller HV, Dekker JP, Jansson S: Structure of the higher plant light harvesting complex I: in vivo characterization and structural interdependence of the Lhca proteins. Biochemistry. 2005, 44: 3065-3073. 10.1021/bi047873g.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Morosinotto T, Ballottari M, Klimmek F, Jansson S, Bassi R: The association of the antenna system to photosystem I in higher plants. Cooperative interactions stabilize the supramolecular complex and enhance red-shifted spectral forms. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 31050-31058. 10.1074/jbc.M502935200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ganeteg U, Strand A, Gustafsson P, Jansson S: The Properties of the Chlorophyll a/b-Binding Proteins Lhca2 and Lhca3 Studied in Vivo Using Antisense Inhibition. Plant Physiol. 2001, 127: 150-158. 10.1104/pp.127.1.150.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Havaux M, Eymery F, Porfirova S, Rey P, Dormann P: Vitamin E protects against photoinhibition and photooxidative stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2005, 17: 3451-3469. 10.1105/tpc.105.037036.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Abarca D, Roldan M, Martin M, Sabater B: Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Cvi shows an increased tolerance to photo-oxidative stress and contains a new chloroplastic copper/zinc superoxide dismutase isoenzyme. J Exp Bot. 2001, 52: 1417-1425. 10.1093/jexbot/52.360.1417.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kalbina I, Strid A: Supplementary ultraviolet-B irradiation reveals differences in stress responses between Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29: 754-763. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01436.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Havaux M, Kloppstech K: The protective functions of carotenoid and flavonoid pigments against excess visible radiation at chilling temperature investigated in Arabidopsis npq and tt mutants. Planta. 2001, 213: 953-966. 10.1007/s004250100572.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ben Shem A, Frolow F, Nelson N: Crystal structure of plant photosystem I. Nature. 2003, 426: 630-635. 10.1038/nature02200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang SP, Scheller HV: Photoinhibition of photosystem I at chilling temperature and subsequent recovery in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004, 45: 1595-1602. 10.1093/pcp/pch180.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shinkarev VP, Zybailov B, Vassiliev IR, Golbeck JH: Modeling of the P700+ charge recombination kinetics with phylloquinone and plastoquinone-9 in the A1 site of photosystem I. Biophys J. 2002, 83: 2885-2897. 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75298-3.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tjus SE, Moller BM, Scheller HV: Photoinhibition of Photosystem I damages both reaction centre proteins PSI-A and PSI-B and acceptor-side located small Photosystem I polypeptides. Photosynthesis Research. 1999, 60: 75-86. 10.1023/A:1006283618695.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dall'Osto L, Fiore A, Cazzaniga S, Giuliano G, Bassi R: Different roles of alpha- and beta-branch xanthophylls in photosystem assembly and photoprotection. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282: 35056-35068. 10.1074/jbc.M704729200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ballottari M, Govoni C, Caffarri S, Morosinotto T: Stoichiometry of LHCI antenna polypeptides and characterisation of gap and linker pigments in higher plants Photosystem I. Eur J Biochem. 2004, 271: 4659-4665. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.04426.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hwang HJ, Kim JH, Eu YJ, Moon BY, Cho SH, Lee CH: Photoinhibition of photosystem I is accelerated by dimethyldithiocarbamate, an inhibitor of superoxide dismutase, during light-chilling of spinach leaves. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2004, 73: 79-85. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2003.09.008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rajagopal S, Bukhov N, Carpentier R: Changes in the structure of chlorophyll-protein complexes and excitation energy transfer during photoinhibitory treatment of isolated photosystem I submembrane particles. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2002, 67: 194-200. 10.1016/S1011-1344(02)00326-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bernhard Teicher H, Moller BL, Scheller HV: Photoinhibition of Photosystem I in field-grown barley (Hordeum vulgare L.): Induction, recovery and acclimation. Photosynthesis Research. 2000, 64: 53-61. 10.1023/A:1026524302191.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kudoh H, Sonoike K: Irreversible damage to photosystem I by chilling in the light: cause of the degradation of chlorophyll after returning to normal growth temperature. Planta. 2002, 215: 541-548. 10.1007/s00425-002-0790-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Croce R, Zucchelli G, Garlaschi FM, Bassi R, Jennings RC: Excited state equilibration in the photosystem I-light – harvesting I complex: P700 is almost isoenergetic with its antenna. Biochemistry. 1996, 35: 8572-8579. 10.1021/bi960214m.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Morosinotto T, Breton J, Bassi R, Croce R: The nature of a chlorophyll ligand in Lhca proteins determines the far red fluorescence emission typical of photosystem I. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 49223-49229. 10.1074/jbc.M309203200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ihalainen JA, Croce R, Morosinotto T, van Stokkum IH, Bassi R, Dekker JP, van Grondelle R: Excitation decay pathways of Lhca proteins: a time-resolved fluorescence study. J Phys Chem B Condens Matter Mater Surf Interfaces Biophys. 2005, 109: 21150-21158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Telfer A: What is beta-carotene doing in the photosystem II reaction centre?. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002, 357: 1431-1439. 10.1098/rstb.2002.1139.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barbato R, Friso G, Rigoni F, Vecchia FD, Giacometti GM: Structural Changes and Lateral Redistribution of Photosystem-II During Donor Side Photoinhibition of Thylakoids. J Cell Biol. 1992, 119: 325-335. 10.1083/jcb.119.2.325.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baena-Gonzalez E, Aro EM: Biogenesis, assembly and turnover of photosystem II units. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002, 357: 1451-1459. 10.1098/rstb.2002.1141.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bergantino E, Brunetta A, Touloupakis E, Segalla A, Szabo I, Giacometti GM: Role of the PSII-H subunit in photoprotection: novel aspects of D1 turnover in Synechocystis 6803. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 41820-41829. 10.1074/jbc.M303096200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sundaresan V, Springer P, Volpe T, Haward S, Jones JD, Dean C, Ma H, Martienssen R: Patterns of gene action in plant development revealed by enhancer trap and gene trap transposable elements. Genes Dev. 1995, 9: 1797-1810. 10.1101/gad.9.14.1797.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heath RL, Packer L: Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts. I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1968, 125: 189-198. 10.1016/0003-9861(68)90654-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Laemmli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970, 227: 680-685. 10.1038/227680a0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gilmore AM, Yamamoto HY: Zeaxanthin Formation and Energy-Dependent Fluorescence Quenching in Pea Chloroplasts Under Artificially Mediated Linear and Cyclic Electron Transport. Plant Physiol. 1991, 96: 635-643. 10.1104/pp.96.2.635.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Croce R, Canino g, Ros F, Bassi R: Chromophore organization in the higher-plant photosystem II antenna protein CP26. Biochemistry. 2002, 41: 7334-7343. 10.1021/bi0257437.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peter GF, Thornber JP: Biochemical composition and organization of higher plant photosystem II LIGHT-HARVESTING PIGMENT-PROTEINS. J Biol Chem. 1991, 266: 16745-16754.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ke B: The primary electron acceptor of photosystem I. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1973, 301: 1-33.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar