Genetic mapping and marker development for resistance of wheat against the root lesion nematode Pratylenchus neglectus
© Jayatilake et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 26 September 2013
Accepted: 23 December 2013
Published: 31 December 2013
The Rlnn1 locus, which resides on chromosome 7A of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) confers moderate resistance against the root lesion nematode Pratylenchus neglectus. Prior to this research, the exact linkage relationships of Rlnn1 with other loci on chromosome 7A were not clear and there were no simple codominant markers available for selection of Rlnn1 in wheat breeding. The objectives of the research reported here were to (1) develop an improved genetic map of the Rlnn1 region of chromosome 7A and (2) develop molecular markers that could be used in marker-assisted selection to improve resistance of wheat against P. neglectus.
A large-effect quantitative trait locus (QTL) for resistance against P. neglectus was genetically mapped using a population of Excalibur/Kukri doubled haploid lines. This QTL coincides in position with the rust resistance gene(s) Lr20/Sr15, the phytoene synthase gene Psy-A1 and 10 molecular markers, including five new markers designed using wheat-rice comparative genomics and wheat expressed sequence tags. Two of the new markers are suitable for use as molecular diagnostic tools to distinguish plants that carry Rlnn1 and Lr20/Sr15 from those that do not carry these resistance genes.
The genomic location of Rlnn1 was confirmed to be in the terminal region of the long arm of chromosome 7A. Molecular markers were developed that provide simple alternatives to costly phenotypic assessment of resistance against P. neglectus in wheat breeding. In Excalibur, genetic recombination seems to be completely suppressed in the Rlnn1 region.
KeywordsRoot lesion nematode Pratylenchus neglectus Wheat Molecular markers Rlnn1 Lr20 Sr15 Psy-A1
The root lesion nematode Pratylenchus neglectus infects a wide range of host plants, including wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and crops that are grown in rotation with wheat. As a migratory endoparasite, P. neglectus moves in and out of roots, feeding as it moves through the root cortex. It causes lesions on roots, stunts plant growth and can significantly reduce crop yield. Plants that reduce the nematode population in root systems and in the soil are considered to be resistant. Resistant crop species and cultivars are valuable in crop rotations because they reduce the threat to subsequent crops.
The Australian wheat cultivars Excalibur and Krichauff have long been known to be at least moderately resistant against P. neglectus[1, 2]. Williams et al.  attributed the P. neglectus resistance of these cultivars to a locus (Rlnn1) on the long arm of chromosome 7A (7AL). They estimated Rlnn1 to be 9.1 cM distal to the gene Lr20, which confers resistance against leaf rust (Puccinia triticina). Lr20 has in turn been reported to co-segregate with Sr15 and Pm1[4, 5], which confer resistance against stem rust (Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici) and powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici), respectively.
Evaluation of resistance against P. neglectus can be laborious and costly, requiring replicated inoculated trials involving counting of nematodes (e.g., ) or the extraction of DNA from soil and root systems, followed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to estimate the quantity of P. neglectus DNA . Molecular markers for Rlnn1 could therefore be very useful selection tools in wheat breeding, allowing phenotyping resources to be allocated only to progeny that had been pre-selected as likely to carry the resistance allele. Williams et al.  suggested conversion of the restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) marker cdo347 and the amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) marker AGC/CCT179, both of which they had reported to be at the same position as Lr20, into PCR-based assays for use in marker-assisted selection of Rlnn1. To our knowledge, no such assays have been developed. This may have been because the reported distance of 9.1 cM seemed too large for such markers to be very useful in wheat breeding.
The phytoene synthase locus Psy-A1 is also in the distal region of 7AL . At this locus, there are multiple alleles, conferring different levels of yellow pigment in wheat grain and flour [8–10]. Krichauff and several other cultivars with moderate resistance against P. neglectus have been reported to carry either the Psy-A1s or Psy-A1t allele [8, 9], both of which are associated with high levels of yellow pigment in flour. Wheat breeders in Australia are interested in developing cultivars with both white flour and resistance against P. neglectus, but, to our knowledge, they have not identified any materials with this combination of traits.
In the research reported here, a large mapping population was used to map Rlnn1 relative to molecular markers and to the genes Lr20, Sr15 and Psy-A1, and new markers were developed and validated for use in selection for resistance against P. neglectus.
Resistance against leaf rust, stem rust and Pratylenchus neglectus
Evaluation of disease responses against the P. triticina pathotype 104–2,3,6,7 and the P. graminis f. sp. tritici pathotype 98–1,2,(3),5,6 indicated that Excalibur and 98 Excalibur/Kukri doubled haploid (DH) lines carry Lr20/Sr15 resistance, while Kukri and 74 other Excalibur/Kukri DH lines are susceptible to both rust pathogens. No lines were observed to be resistant against one pathogen and susceptible to the other, indicating that if Lr20 and Sr15 are two genes (not a single pleiotropic gene), they are in complete coupling linkage in the Excalibur/Kukri population.
With QTL analysis using the estimated quantity of P. neglectus DNA per plant as the trait value, Rlnn1 was detected as a highly significant QTL (peak LOD = 34; Figure 2) at the same position as Lr20, Sr15, Psy-A1 and the collocating STS, SSR and DArT markers. This locus accounted for 60% of the observed phenotypic variation.
Development of new markers based on comparative analysis between wheat and rice
Since the physical locations of the SSR markers cfa2240 (in the above-mentioned terminal marker cluster) and cfa2019 (28.3 cM proximal to the cluster) had both previously been assigned to the wheat deletion bin 7AL16-0.86-0.90 , 42 unique expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from that deletion bin and 45 unique ESTs from the deletion bin 7AL18-0.90-1.00 were selected for use in comparative genomic analysis with rice (see Additional file 3). Of these 87 ESTs, 60 had BLASTN E-values less than e-10. Consistent with previous evidence of synteny between the distal part of 7AL and chromosome 6 of rice , more than half of these ESTs were similar to sequences in the terminal region of rice chromosome 6 (19 of 30 ESTs from 7AL16-0.86-0.90, and 15 of 30 ESTs from 7AL18-0.90-1.00).
Similarly, the probe sequences of three RFLP markers that had previously been reported to be linked with Rlnn1, Lr20 and/or Pm1[3, 4] showed high similarity with predicted genes in the terminal region of rice chromosome 6: PSR148 with LOC_Os06g51150 (1.2e-260), PSR680 with LOC_Os06g49380 (5.4e-103), and CDO347 with LOC_Os06g51270 (1.2e-98). The CDO347 sequence also had a significant BLASTN hit (5.7e-88) on rice chromosome 2 (LOC_Os02g58560). For PSR121, a probe that had been used to map another RFLP near Rlnn1, Lr20 and Pm1[3, 4] the most significant hit (7.6e-161) was on rice chromosome 5 (LOC_Os5g31140).
BE445506: The primer pair BE445506_F/R amplified products of approximately 150 bp from both parents and from an artificial heterozygote (a 1:1 mixture of Excalibur and Kukri DNA) (Figure 3A). Similar amplicons were obtained for all six Chinese Spring group-7 nullisomic-tetrasomic lines (CS N7A-T7B, CS N7A-T7D, CS N7B-T7A, CS N7B-T7D, CS N7D-T7A and CS N7D-T7B), indicating that this primer pair is not genome-specific. With high-resolution melting analysis, a polymorphism between Excalibur and Kukri was detected, providing a codominant marker assay (wri1) (Figure 4A).
BE445653: The primer pair BE445653_F/R (wri2) amplified 7A-specific products with differing sizes from Excalibur (586 bp) and Kukri (512 bp). This length polymorphism can be scored visually after electrophoretic separation on agarose gels (Figure 3B), providing a codominant marker assay. Sequencing of the amplicons revealed that the 74-bp length polymorphism between Excalibur and Kukri is due to the net effect of a number of insertion/deletion polymorphisms, which range in length from 1 to 30 nucleotides. Sequence polymorphisms between Excalibur and Kukri were also observed at 80 nucleotide sites (see Additional file 4).
BF484041: The primer pair BF484041_F/R (wri3) amplified three distinct products from Kukri (approximately 250 bp, 450 bp and 350 bp which are apparently specific to chromosomes 7A, 7B and 7D respectively). In Excalibur, only the 7B- and 7D-specific products showed strong amplification (Figure 3C). With high-resolution melting analysis, Excalibur, Kukri and an artificial heterozygote (a 1:1 mixture of Excalibur and Kukri DNA) each had a distinct melting curve, providing a codominant marker assay (Figure 4B).
CN010180: The primer pairs CN010180_F1/R and CN010180_F2/R amplified 7A-specific products from Excalibur and Kukri, respectively. The two clearly visible amplicons were of similar size (approximately 175 bp). With sequential loading of the two PCR products onto gels, the two complementary allele-specific primer pairs (CN010180_F1/R and CN010180_F2/R) provided a codominant marker assay (wri4) (Figure 3D).
BF483039: The primer pair BF483039A_F2/BF483039_cpR1, obtained from the Wheat SNP Database [13, 14] amplified a product of approximately 600 bp from Kukri, but no product from Excalibur, providing a 7A-specific dominant marker (wri5, Figure 3E).
When assayed on the Excalibur/Kukri DH lines, all five EST-based markers co-segregated with gwm344, cfa2240, wPt-0790, schfc3, sts638, Psy-A1, Lr20 and Sr15.
Molecular marker genotypes of resistant and susceptible wheat cultivars
With the csPSY marker, all 11 resistant cultivars provided the same result as Excalibur, indicating the presence of the Psy-A1s or Psy-A1t (‘very yellow’) alleles. None of the susceptible cultivars gave this result. With sequencing of the region in which the Psy-A1s or Psy-A1t alleles have been reported to differ, it was confirmed that all 11 resistant cultivars carry the Psy-A1t allele [GenBank:HM006895] (see Additional file 2). With BstN1 restriction of the csPSY amplicon, each of the susceptible cultivars was classified as carrying either the Psy-A1p (‘pale yellow’) or Psy-A1e (‘white’) allele.
Data on 182 progeny lines derived from a cross between Excalibur and Kukri wheat were used to map the root lesion nematode resistance locus Rlnn1 as a QTL on 7AL, at a position that coincides with several molecular markers and with the rust resistance loci Lr20 and Sr15. As expected, the allele from Excalibur conferred greater resistance. For P. neglectus and other parasitic nematodes, resistance refers to the ability of the plant to limit nematode multiplication and thereby reduce the nematode population in the soil. In field experiments, measures of resistance require data on initial and final nematode populations. In inoculated experiments such as the one conducted here, estimates of the final populations are sufficient, given that the initial population is the same for all plants. In this experiment, P. neglectus DNA was quantified in the root systems only (and not in the surrounding soil). Accordingly, there could be some unknown confounding from differences in the size of the root system. Although root mass was not recorded in this experiment, no obvious differences in root size or density were noticed. Given that the moderate resistance of Excalibur was originally detected in field experiments [1, 2] and that it has been repeatedly classified as moderately resistant using a range of methods, its resistance cannot be dismissed as simply an artefact of any variation in root size.
Our linkage map can be compared to a previously published map  based on the relative positions of the SSR marker gwm344, the rust resistance gene Lr20 and the STS marker schfc3 (Figure 2). In addition, the positions of the new markers wri3 and wri4 can be compared with the position of the RFLP locus cdo347. This is because wri3 and wri4 were designed based on EST sequences [GenBank:BF484041 and GenBank:CN010180] with high similarity (1.0e-56 and 4.0e-113, respectively) to the rice gene LOC_Os06g51270, which was the most significant hit for the CDO347 probe.
On the Excalibur/Kukri map, the Rlnn1 QTL and four molecular markers (gwm344, schfc3, wri3 and wri4) all collocate with Lr20. In the earlier map , schfc3 and cdo347 collocated with Lr20, but gwm344 was 22.7 cM distal to Lr20 and Rlnn1 was about halfway between Lr20 and gwm344. These discrepancies are probably due to differences in sample size and methodology. The original estimate of the position of Rlnn1 relied upon data from three small samples of progeny lines (25, 30 and 31 lines), each derived from a different cross. Each line was classified as either resistant or susceptible to P. neglectus and a consensus mapping approach was used to map Rlnn1 as a discrete locus. With that approach and those sample sizes, any misclassification of lines or mis-scoring of markers could have considerably expanded the estimated distance between loci. In our work, trait data for P. neglectus resistance, which exhibited bimodal quantitative variation (Figure 1), were used to map Rlnn1 as a QTL, without any attempt to classify the lines into distinct categories.
We detected a very strong association of resistance against P. neglectus with Lr20/Sr15, Psy-A1 and 10 collocating molecular markers (gwm344, cfa2240, schfc3, wPt-0790, sts638, wri1, wri2, wri3, wri4 and wri5). Of these, sts638 had already been recommended  for selection of resistance conferred by Lr20 and/or Pm1, but it has the disadvantage of being a dominant marker. The markers schfc3, wPt-0790 and wri5 are also dominant, as is wri3 when assayed using gel electrophoresis with scoring of the presence or absence of a 250-bp chromosome 7A-specific amplicon. The markers csPSY, gwm344, cfa2240, wri2 and wri4 can all be assayed as codominant markers using electrophoresis, while wri1 and wri3 can be assayed as codominant markers using high-resolution melting analysis. We confirmed that csPSY, wri2, wri3, wri4 and wri5 all distinguish Excalibur and 11 wheat cultivars that are known to have moderate resistance against P. neglectus and/or to carry Lr20/Sr15, from Kukri and other 14 wheat cultivars that lack the resistance conferred by Rlnn1 and Lr20/Sr15.
For marker-assisted selection of the root lesion nematode resistance locus Rlnn1, we recommend wri2 for gel electrophoresis (Figure 3B) and wri3 for high-resolution melting analysis (Figure 4B). The 7A-specific marker wri2 is suitable for electrophoretic separation because it involves a substantial (74-bp) length polymorphism, whilst wri3 can be scored as a high-throughput codominant marker using high-resolution melting analysis. Either of these markers would also be suitable for selection of the resistance genes Lr20/Sr15 and Pm1. They both clearly distinguish between all of the resistant and susceptible materials that we have assayed, so they are likely to be useful across a wide range of wheat breeding germplasm.
Other loci within the wheat genome have also been reported to carry sets of co-segregating genes conferring resistance against rusts and powdery mildew. These include the Lr34/Yr18/Pm38 locus on chromosome 7D, Lr46/Yr29/Pm39 locus on chromosome 1B and Lr67/Yr46 locus on chromosome 4D [15–21]. For the Lr34/Yr18/Pm38 locus, a single gene encoding a protein resembling an adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette (ABC) transporter has been determined to confer resistance against leaf rust, stripe rust (caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici) and powdery mildew . For Lr20/Sr15 and Pm1, McIntosh  found that changes to the Lr20 disease reaction were always accompanied by changes to the Sr15 reaction, while changes to Pm1 were independent, indicating that the genetic determinant of Pm1 resistance is not the same as for Lr20/Sr15. There is no particular reason to assume that the Rlnn1 resistance effect is due to the same gene(s) as the Lr20/Sr15 or Pm1 resistance effects.
While coupling-phase linkage of alleles conferring resistance against multiple pathogens may be advantageous, the linkage of resistance alleles with a Psy-A1 allele that confers high levels of yellow pigment in wheat flour is disadvantageous for markets that favour white flour. Recombinant progeny carrying the nematode resistance gene in combination with a low-pigment allele of Psy-A1 would be useful in wheat breeding. We have not found any such recombinants. Neu et al.  have suggested that Lr20 and Pm1 are in a region of suppressed recombination. They proposed that this could be due to an alien introgression or a genetic rearrangement. Based on the results presented here, it seems likely that Rlnn1 and Psy-A1 are also within the region of suppressed recombination. Based on previously reported sequence similarity of the Psy-A1t allele with B-genome alleles , it seems possible that chromosome 7A of Excalibur and the other resistant cultivars carries an ancestral translocation from the terminal region of the long arm of chromosome 7B.
Both the observed collocation of the Rlnn1 QTL with Psy-A1 (Figure 2) and the hypothesis that these loci are in a region of suppressed recombination are consistent with the experience of wheat breeders in Australia, who have not (to our knowledge) been able to combine Rlnn1 resistance with white flour colour. In addition to limiting the opportunity to obtain favourable recombinants between Rlnn1 and Psy-A1 for wheat breeding purposes, suppression of recombination could impede positional cloning of Rlnn1, Lr20/Sr15 and Pm1.
The research reported here has clarified the position of the Rlnn1 locus for resistance against the root lesion nematode P. neglectus, by using a large wheat population to map Rlnn1 as a QTL, rather than relying upon consensus mapping from small samples. The approach adopted here has clearly shown that Rlnn1 is very closely linked with the rust resistance gene(s) Lr20 and Sr15, the t allele of the phytoene synthase gene Psy-A1 and several molecular markers. Some of the molecular markers developed here are useful for wheat breeding; they provide simple alternatives to costly phenotypic assessment of resistance against P. neglectus and they have been confirmed to be diagnostic across a panel of wheat cultivars. The results reported here are consistent with the hypothesis that materials with Rlnn1 resistance carry a chromosome rearrangement on 7AL and that this suppresses genetic recombination in this region.
The plant materials used here included the Australian wheat cultivars Excalibur (RAC177(Sr26)/Uniculm492//RAC311S; released by the University of Adelaide in 1991) and Kukri (76ECN44/76ECN36//RAC549; Madden/6*RAC177; released by the University of Adelaide in 1999), 182 DH lines produced from the F1 generation of a cross between Excalibur and Kukri, a panel of 25 other wheat cultivars (sourced from the Australian Winter Cereals Collection) and six Chinese Spring nullisomic-tetrasomic lines (CS N7A-T7B, CS N7A-T7D, CS N7B-T7A, CS N7B-T7D, CS N7D-T7A and CS N7D-T7B, developed by Sears ).
The 182 Excalibur/Kukri DH lines were selected from 233 such lines for which molecular markers had previously been assayed . The remaining 51 DH lines were excluded based on examination of the molecular marker data: 43 because they seemed to be genetically identical to other lines in the population, 6 because the DNA samples representing those lines exhibited more than one allele for numerous markers, indicating possible contamination of the lines or DNA samples, and 2 due to possible errors in DNA extraction.
Among the 25 wheat cultivars in the panel, 11 (Aroona, Bindawarra, Bowie, BT-Schomburgk, Wyalkatchem, Cascades, Krichauff, Thew, Tatiara, Orion and Vectis) are known to have moderate resistance against P. neglectus and/or to carry Lr20/Sr15, while the other 14 (AGT Scythe, Annuello, Babbler, Buckley, Calingiri, Chara, Gladius, Hartog, Machete, Sunbri, Sunlin, Sunstate, Sunvale and Yitpi) are susceptible to P. neglectus and do not carry Lr20/Sr15.
Evaluation of resistance against leaf rust, stem rust and Pratylenchus neglectus
Resistance against rust pathogens was evaluated using the methods described by Bariana and McIntosh . Two sets of seedlings were sown, one for inoculation with the P. triticina (Pt) pathotype 104–2,3,6,7 (PBI culture no. 231) and one for inoculation with the P. graminis f. sp. tritici (Pgt) pathotype 98–1,2,(3),5,6 (PBI culture no. 279). For each pathogen, 176 Excalibur/Kukri DH lines (six of the lines that had been genotyped were excluded due to insufficient seed availability or poor germination) were sown in 9-cm plastic pots (five seeds per line and four lines per pot) filled with a mixture of pine bark and river sand. Sown pots were fertilized with balanced fertilizer Aquasol® (10 g/10 L for 100 pots). Seedlings were raised in a controlled-environment microclimate room maintained at 20 ± 2°C. At 7 d after sowing, urea was applied at the same rate as the Aquasol®. At the two-leaf stage (10 to 12 d after sowing), urediniospores suspended in light Shellsol T® mineral oil were atomised on the seedlings using a hydrocarbon pressure pack. The Pt-inoculated seedlings were incubated for 24 h in a misting room fitted with an ultrasonic humidifier. The Pgt-inoculated seedlings were incubated for 48 h under natural light conditions at 18 ± 2°C on water-filled steel trays covered with plastic hoods. Seedlings were then transferred to a microclimate room maintained at 18 ± 2°C. Infection type assessments of each line were made 14 d after inoculation using the 0–4 scales described by McIntosh et al. . Each line was classified as resistant or susceptible to leaf and stem rust.
Evaluation of resistance against P. neglectus was carried out by the South Australian Research and Development Institute Root Disease Testing Service, Adelaide . Plants were grown in a partially replicated experiment using four blocks sown at weekly intervals. Thirteen lines had to be excluded from this experiment due to insufficient availability of viable seed. Excalibur, Kukri and each of 170 Excalibur/Kukri DH lines, were each assigned to one block, while each of 50 Excalibur/Kukri DH lines was assigned to two blocks. Seeds of Excalibur, Kukri and the Excalibur/Kukri DH lines were pre-germinated over a period of 2 d in a misting chamber maintained between 22 and 24°C. For each experimental unit, five pre-germinated seeds were sown in tubes (55 × 120 mm) containing 350 g of steam-pasteurised sand. These tubes were arranged in crates according to a pre-determined design, with each experimental unit consisting of a row of five adjacent tubes. Watering was carried out by flooding the tubes up to a 100-mm depth for 4 min, every 3 d.
The P. neglectus inoculum used in the study was sourced from plants grown in Cambrai soil in South Australia. The culture was maintained in carrot calli using methods modified from Moody et al.  and was subcultured every 90 d. The nematodes were extracted from the carrot calli using a mist chamber as described by Hooper . Nematodes were counted in three 250-μL samples of extract and the inoculum was adjusted to a final concentration of 1,500 nematodes/mL by diluting with sterile water. One week after sowing, each tube was inoculated by making two 50-mm-deep holes close to the seedling and dividing a 1-mL aliquot of the inoculum between the two holes. After inoculation, watering was suspended for 3 d. On the second day after inoculation, 1.4 g of a slow-release fertiliser (Osmocote, Scotts Miracle-Gro, USA) was added to each tube and the sand surface was covered with a layer of plastic beads to reduce evaporation and mould development.
Eight weeks after inoculation, the plants were removed from the tubes. The roots were cut, washed with running water to remove all soil and dried at 60°C. For each plant, total DNA was extracted from air dried roots as has been described for soil DNA extraction [30, 31]. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed on an ABI PRISM® 7900HT instrument using TaqMan® Minor Groove Binder probe (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The TaqMan probe (6FAM- 5′- CATTGGGCTCAGAAAC −3′) was used at 200 nM final concentration with a forward primer (5′- CACGGACCAAGGAGTTTATCG −3′) and a reverse primer (5′-CGAGGACATGTTTCACTTTCATTG-3′), each at 400 nM final concentration. The qPCR reactions were prepared using the QuantiTect Probe PCR Master Mix (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany). The PCR conditions were 50°C for 2 min; 95°C for 15 min followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min. The quantity of P. neglectus DNA per plant was calculated using a standard calibration curve obtained from 10-fold serial dilution series of purified P. neglectus genomic DNA.
The resulting phenotypic data were analysed using the REML directive in GenStat v220.127.116.1125 (VSN International Ltd., UK), employing a model that included random effects for the experimental block and the parental or DH line. Comparisons of the P. neglectus resistance between the rust-resistant and rust-susceptible groups were carried out by applying a two-sample t test to line best linear unbiased predictions (BLUPs) for P. neglectus DNA per plant, assuming unequal group variances.
Wheat-rice comparative analysis and development of new markers from wheat ESTs
PCR markers designed based on five wheat expressed sequence tags (ESTs)
Forward primer (5′-3′)
Reverse primer (5′-3′)
Partial sequencing of Psy-A1and BE445653
The primer pair PSY7A5_F/R was used to amplify a region of the gene Psy-A1 from the cultivars Excalibur, Aroona, Bindawarra, Bowie, BT-Schomburgk, Wyalkatchem, Cascades, Krichauff, Thew, Tatiara, Orion and Vectis using conditions given in Additional file 5. PCR products were cleaned up using NucleoSpin® Gel and PCR clean-up kit (MACHEREY-NAGEL GmbH & Co. KG). Sequencing was carried out at Australian Genome Research Facility Ltd., Adelaide by capillary separation on the Applied Biosystems 3730xl DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). The sequences of Excalibur and 11 other cultivars were aligned to Psy-A1t allele sequence of the breeding line WAWHT2074 [GenBank:HM006895]  and Psy-A1s allele sequence of the cultivar Schomburgk [GenBank:EU649795]  with the multiple align module implemented in Geneious® 6.0.4 (Biomatters Ltd., New Zealand) with default settings.
Primer pair wri2_F/R was used to amplify a region of BE445653 from the cultivars Excalibur, Bowie, Wyalkatchem, Cascades, Krichauff, Kukri, Machete, AGT Scythe, Chara, Gladius, Buckley and Yitpi using the conditions described in Additional file 5. PCR purification, sequencing and sequence analysis and alignment were performed as described above.
Genotyping of molecular markers
The STS markers schfc3 (designed based on the STS marker FC7) and sts638, the Psy1-A1 marker csPSY and five new markers (wri1, wri2, wri3, wri4 and wri5, Table 1) were assayed on Excalibur, Kukri and each of the 182 Excalibur/Kukri DH lines, using PCR conditions described in Additional file 5. For markers wri2, wri4, wri5, schfc3 and csPSY, genotypes were assayed on 2.0 to 2.5% agarose gels (see Additional file 5). For markers wri1, wri3 and sts638, genotypes were assayed using high-resolution melting technology  in a Roche LightCycler® 480 using conditions reported in Additional file 5. Melting curves were analysed using the gene scanning module of Roche LightCycler® software version 1.5.0. The five new markers (wri1, wri2, wri3, wri4 and wri5) and csPSY were also assayed on the panel of 25 wheat cultivars, on the Chinese Spring nullisomic-tetrasomic lines (CS N7A-T7B, CS N7A-T7D, CS N7B-T7A, CS N7B-T7D, CS N7D-T7A and CS N7D-T7B) and on an artificial heterozygote (created by combining equal amounts of Excalibur and Kukri 50-ng/μl DNA).
For each rust pathogen, each Excalibur/Kukri DH line for which all plants were resistant (infection type of 0–2) was classified as carrying the Excalibur allele of the corresponding rust resistance gene and each line for which all plants were susceptible (infection type of 3–4) were classified as carrying the Kukri allele. Four lines that exhibited mixed responses (some resistant plants and some susceptible) were treated as having missing data for the rust resistance loci. Similarly, for each molecular marker, each DH line was classified as carrying the same allele as Excalibur or the same allele as Kukri. Six markers that had originally been mapped on chromosome 7A  were excluded due to ambiguous genotypic scores (gdm125, gwm681, wPt-7299, wPt-2260 and wPt-1259) or a high frequency of missing data (wPt-6668). The newly assayed markers (wri1, wri2, wri3, wri4, wri5, sts638 and schfc3), the phytoene synthase gene Psy-A1 and the rust resistance locus Lr20/Sr15 were added to the existing chromosome 7A genetic linkage map  using the ‘distribute’ function of MapManager QTXb20  (search linkage criterion set at a LOD threshold of p = 1e-6; map distance estimation done using Kosambi mapping function ). The marker order was refined using RECORD  and the goodness-of-fit of the marker order was examined by plotting pairwise recombination fractions against LOD linkage statistics. Line BLUPs of the quantity of P. neglectus DNA per plant were used to map Rlnn1 as a QTL on the resulting genetic map by interval mapping as implemented in Qgene 4.3.10  with a step size of 1 cM and a significance threshold for detection of QTL set by performing 1000 permutations with a genome wide Type I error rate of 0.05. The final linkage map and QTL graph was plotted using MapChart v2.2 .
DVJ and EJT are joint first authors.
Quantitative trait locus
Long arm of chromosome 7A
Polymerase chain reaction
Restriction fragment length polymorphism
Amplified fragment length polymorphism
Simple sequence repeat
Diversity arrays technology
Logarithmic of odds
expressed sequence tag
Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
Best linear unbiased prediction.
This work was supported by grants from the Grains Research and Development Corporation and by a University of Adelaide International Postgraduate Research Scholarship awarded to Dimanthi Jayatilake. We thank Danuta Pounsett and John Lewis of the South Australian Research and Development Institute for assessment of nematode resistance, the Australian Winter Cereals Collection for providing seeds of wheat cultivars and Margaret Pallotta of the Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics for providing seeds of Chinese Spring nullisomic-tetrasomic lines.
- Taylor SP, Hollaway GJ, Hunt CH: Effect of field crops on population densities of Pratylenchus neglectus and P. thornei in southeastern Australia; part 1: P. neglectus. J Nematol. 2000, 32: 591-599.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Vanstone VA, Rathjen AJ, Ware AH, Wheeler RD: Relationship between root lesion nematodes (Pratylenchus neglectus and P. thornei) and performance of wheat varieties. Aust J Exp Agric. 1998, 38: 181-188. 10.1071/EA97109.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Williams KJ, Taylor SP, Bogacki P, Pallotta M, Bariana HS, Wallwork H: Mapping of the root lesion nematode (Pratylenchus neglectus) resistance gene Rlnn1 in wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2002, 104: 874-879. 10.1007/s00122-001-0839-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Neu C, Stein N, Keller B: Genetic mapping of the Lr20-Pm1 resistance locus reveals suppressed recombination on chromosome arm 7AL in hexaploid wheat. Genome. 2002, 45: 737-744. 10.1139/g02-040.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- The TT, McIntosh RA: Cytogenetical studies in wheat VIII: * telocentric mapping and linkage studies involving Sr22 and other genes in chromosome 7AL. Aust J Biol Sci. 1975, 28: 531-538.Google Scholar
- Ophel-Keller K, McKay A, Hartley D, Herdina , Curran J: Development of a routine DNA-based testing service for soilborne diseases in Australia. Australas Plant Pathol. 2008, 37: 243-253. 10.1071/AP08029.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- He XY, Zhang YL, He ZH, Wu YP, Xiao YG, Ma CX, Xia XC: Characterization of phytoene synthase 1 gene (Psy1) located on common wheat chromosome 7A and development of a functional marker. Theor Appl Genet. 2008, 116: 213-221. 10.1007/s00122-007-0660-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Howitt CA, Cavanagh CR, Bowerman AF, Cazzonelli C, Rampling L, Mimica JL, Pogson BJ: Alternative splicing, activation of cryptic exons and amino acid substitutions in carotenoid biosynthetic genes are associated with lutein accumulation in wheat endosperm. Funct Integr Genomics. 2009, 9: 363-376. 10.1007/s10142-009-0121-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Crawford AC, Stefanova K, Lambe W, McLean R, Wilson R, Barclay I, Francki MG: Functional relationships of phytoene synthase 1 alleles on chromosome 7A controlling flour colour variation in selected Australian wheat genotypes. Theor Appl Genet. 2011, 123: 95-108. 10.1007/s00122-011-1569-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ravel C, Dardevet M, Leenhardt F, Bordes J, Joseph JL, Perretant MR, Exbrayat F, Poncet C, Balfourier F, Chanliaud E, Charmet G: Improving the yellow pigment content of bread wheat flour by selecting the three homoeologous copies of Psy1. Mol Breed. 2013, 31: 87-99. 10.1007/s11032-012-9772-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sourdille P, Singh S, Cadalen T, Brown-Guedira GL, Gay G, Qi L, Gill BS, Dufour P, Murigneux A, Bernard M: Microsatellite-based deletion bin system for the establishment of genetic-physical map relationships in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Funct Integr Genomics. 2004, 4: 12-25. 10.1007/s10142-004-0106-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sorrells ME, La Rota M, Bermudez-Kandianis CE, Greene RA, Kantety R, Munkvold JD, Miftahudin , Mahmoud A, Ma X, Gustafson PJ, Qi LL, Echalier B, Gill BS, Matthews DE, Lazo GR, Chao S, Anderson OD, Edwards H, Linkiewicz AM, Dubcovsky J, Akhunov ED, Dvorak J, Zhang D, Nguyen HT, Peng J, Lapitan NLV, Gonzalez-Hernandez JL, Anderson JA, Hossain K, Kalavacharla V, et al: Comparative DNA sequence analysis of wheat and rice genomes. Genome Res. 2003, 13: 1818-1827.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wheat SNP database. http://probes.pw.usda.gov:8080/snpworld/Map.
- Akhunov ED, Akhunova AR, Anderson OD, Anderson JA, Blake N, Clegg MT, Coleman-Derr D, Conley EJ, Crossman CC, Deal KR, Dubcovsky J, Gill BS, Gu YQ, Hadam J, Heo H, Huo N, Lazo GR, Luo M-C, Ma YQ, Matthews DE, McGuire PE, Morrell PL, Qualset CO, Renfro J, Tabanao D, Talbert LE, Tian C, Toleno DM, Warburton ML, You FM, Zhang W, Dvorak J: Nucleotide diversity maps reveal variation in diversity among wheat genomes and chromosomes. BMC Genomics. 2010, 11: 702. 10.1186/1471-2164-11-702.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lillemo M, Asalf B, Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J, Chen XM, He ZH, Bjørnstad Å: The adult plant rust resistance loci Lr34/Yr18 and Lr46/Yr29 are important determinants of partial resistance to powdery mildew in bread wheat line Saar. Theor Appl Genet. 2008, 116: 1155-1166. 10.1007/s00122-008-0743-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Spielmeyer W, McIntosh RA, Kolmer J, Lagudah ES: Powdery mildew resistance and Lr34/Yr18 genes for durable resistance to leaf and stripe rust cosegregate at a locus on the short arm of chromosome 7D of wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2005, 111: 731-735. 10.1007/s00122-005-2058-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Herrera-Foessel SA, Lagudah ES, Huerta-Espino J, Hayden MJ, Bariana HS, Singh D, Singh RP: New slow-rusting leaf rust and stripe rust resistance genes Lr67 and Yr46 in wheat are pleiotropic or closely linked. Theor Appl Genet. 2011, 122: 239-249. 10.1007/s00122-010-1439-x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Singh RP: Genetic association of leaf rust resistance gene Lr34 with adult plant resistance to stripe rust in bread wheat. Phytopathology. 1992, 82: 835-838. 10.1094/Phyto-82-835.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McIntosh RA: Close genetic linkage of genes conferring adult‒plant resistance to leaf rust and stripe rust in wheat. Plant Pathol. 1992, 41: 523-527.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- William M, Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J, Islas SO, Hoisington D: Molecular marker mapping of leaf rust resistance gene Lr46 and its association with stripe rust resistance gene Yr29 in wheat. Phytopathology. 2003, 93: 153-159. 10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.2.153.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hiebert CW, Thomas JB, McCallum BD, Humphreys DG, DePauw RM, Hayden MJ, Mago R, Schnippenkoetter W, Spielmeyer W: An introgression on wheat chromosome 4DL in RL6077 (Thatcher*6/PI 250413) confers adult plant resistance to stripe rust and leaf rust (Lr67). Theor Appl Genet. 2010, 121: 1083-1091. 10.1007/s00122-010-1373-y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Krattinger SG, Lagudah ES, Spielmeyer W, Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J, McFadden H, Bossolini E, Selter LL, Keller B: A putative ABC transporter confers durable resistance to multiple fungal pathogens in wheat. Science. 2009, 323: 1360-1363. 10.1126/science.1166453.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McIntosh RA: Nature of induced mutations affecting disease reaction in wheat. Induced mutations against plant diseases: Proceedings of a symposium on the use of induced mutations for improving disease resistance in crop plants; 31 January - 4 February 1977; Vienna. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 1977, 551-564.Google Scholar
- Sears ER: The aneuploids of common wheat. Res Bull Mo Agric Exp Sta. 1954, 572: 1-58.Google Scholar
- Edwards J: PhD thesis. A genetic analysis of drought related traits in hexaploid wheat. The University of Adelaide, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine; 2012,Google Scholar
- Bariana HS, McIntosh RA: Cytogenetic studies in wheat: XV location of rust resistance genes in VPM1 and their genetic linkage with other disease resistance genes in chromosome 2A. Genome. 1993, 36: 476-482. 10.1139/g93-065.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McIntosh RA, Wellings CR, Park RF: Wheat rusts: an atlas of resistance genes. Melbourne: CSIRO; 1995,View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moody EH, Lownsbery BF, Ahmed JM: Culture of the root-lesion nematode Pratylenchus vulnus on carrot disks. J Nematol. 1973, 5: 225-226.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hooper DJ: Extraction of Nematodes from Plant Material. Laboratory Methods for Work with Plant and Soil Nematodes. Edited by: Southey JF. London: HMSO Books; 1986, 51-58. 6Google Scholar
- Haling RE, Simpson RJ, McKay AC, Hartley D, Lambers H, Ophel-Keller K, Wiebkin S, Herdina , Riley IT, Richardson AE: Direct measurement of roots in soil for single and mixed species using a quantitative DNA-based method. Plant Soil. 2011, 348: 123-137. 10.1007/s11104-011-0846-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Riley IT, Wiebkin S, Hartley D, McKay AC: Quantification of roots and seeds in soil with real-time PCR. Plant Soil. 2010, 331: 151-163. 10.1007/s11104-009-0241-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Graingenes database. http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/GG2/index.shtml]
- Rice genome annotation project database. http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/analyses_search_blast.shtml]
- Kawahara Y, de la Bastide M, Hamilton JP, Kanamori H, McCombie WR, Ouyang S, Schwartz DC, Tanaka T, Wu J, Zhou S, Childs KL, Davidson RM, Lin H, Quesada-Ocampo L, Vaillancourt B, Sakai H, Lee SS, Kim J, Numa H, Itoh T, Buell CR, Matsumoto T: Improvement of the Oryza sativa nipponbare reference genome using next generation sequence and optical map data. Rice. 2013, 6: 4. 10.1186/1939-8433-6-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- NCBI. [http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/]
- Parker GD, Langridge P: Development of a STS marker linked to a major locus controlling flour colour in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Mol Breed. 2000, 6: 169-174. 10.1023/A:1009638017859.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wittwer CT, Reed GH, Gundry CN, Vandersteen JG, Pryor RJ: High-resolution genotyping by amplicon melting analysis using LCGreen. Clin Chem. 2003, 49: 853-860. 10.1373/49.6.853.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Manly KF, Cudmore RH, Meer JM: Map manager QTX, cross-platform software for genetic mapping. Mamm Genome. 2001, 12: 930-932. 10.1007/s00335-001-1016-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kosambi DD: The estimation of map distances from recombination values. Ann Eugen. 1944, 12: 172-175.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Van Os H, Stam P, Visser RGF, Van Eck HJ: RECORD: a novel method for ordering loci on a genetic linkage map. Theor Appl Genet. 2005, 112: 30-40. 10.1007/s00122-005-0097-x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Joehanes R, Nelson JC: QGene 4.0, an extensible Java QTL-analysis platform. Bioinformatics. 2008, 24: 2788-2789. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn523.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Voorrips RE: MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J Hered. 2002, 93: 77-78. 10.1093/jhered/93.1.77.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.