Skip to main content

Mitigating water deficit stress in lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.) through integrated soil amendments: A pathway to sustainable agriculture

Abstract

Lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.) is a valuable medicinal plant, but its growth can be significantly impacted by drought stress. This study aimed to mitigate the adverse effects of water deficit stress on lemon balm biomass by integrating poultry manure compost, poultry manure biochar, NPK fertilizer, Trichoderma harzianum, Thiobacillus thioparus, and elemental sulfur as soil amendments. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse using a completely randomized design with a factorial arrangement, consisting of three replicates. It included a water deficit stress factor at three levels (95–100%, 75–80%, and 55–60% of field capacity) and a soil amendment treatment factor with eleven different fertilizer levels. Treatments included control (no amendment), NPK fertilizer, poultry manure compost, poultry manure biochar, and combinations of these with T. harzianum, T. thioparus, and elemental sulfur under various water deficit levels. Water deficit stress significantly reduced photosynthetic pigments, gas exchange parameters, chlorophyll fluorescence, relative water content, and antioxidant enzyme activity, while increasing membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation in lemon balm plants. However, the integrated application of organic, biological, and chemical amendments mitigated these negative impacts. The combined treatment of poultry manure compost, poultry manure biochar, NPK fertilizer, T. harzianum, T. thioparus, and elemental sulfur was the most effective in improving the morpho-physiological properties (1.97–60%) and biomass (2.31–2.76 times) of lemon balm under water deficit stress. The results demonstrate the potential of this holistic approach to enhance the resilience of lemon balm cultivation in water-scarce environments. The integration of organic, biological, and chemical amendments can contribute to sustainable agricultural practices by improving plant morphological and physiological properties and plant performance under drought conditions.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.) is a perennial herb valued for its essential oils [1], but drought stress significantly impacts its growth. With climate change leading to decreased rainfall and increased drought, water scarcity poses a major challenge to agriculture [2, 3]. Drought stress can significantly alter the biochemical, physiological, and morphological traits of plants, as well as their quality characteristics, resulting in noticeable changes in structure, function, and growth patterns [4, 5]. Changes in the biochemical, physiological, and morphological characteristics of the plant caused by drought stress can affect lemon balm plant biomass [6]. Consequently, researchers are actively seeking solutions to enhance water productivity and soil fertility, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions, while minimizing costs and biological pollution.

Various programs have been proposed to address this challenge, with one prominent method being the implementation of organic amendments in soil management practices [7, 8]. In a study, it was found that drought stress negatively impacted the growth and physiological traits of mustard (Brassica juncea), as well as its macro- and micronutrient concentrations. However, the application of organic fertilizers significantly improved plant height, leaf area, relative water content, membrane stability index, and chlorophyll content, enabling the plants to better withstand drought conditions and enhancing their nutrient content [9]. In another study, it was found that drought stress increased essential oil content but decreased essential oil yield and other physiological traits of lemon balm; however, the application of vermicompost significantly improved these traits, especially relative water content, highlighting important interactions with irrigation treatments [10]. The incorporation of adequate amounts of organic amendments into soil also enhances its physical, chemical, and biological properties, thereby facilitating improved water infiltration, reduced soil evaporation, and increased water retention capacity [11,12,13].

One of the organic amendments commonly utilized in agriculture is poultry manure. Despite being a valuable source of nutrients (rich in N and significant quantities of P and K and trace elements) for plants, poultry manure presents certain drawbacks in agricultural practices (e.g., infectious diseases and pests such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella, etc. and nematodes, burning seedlings, toxic gas hazards, high salinity, slow fertilizer efficiency, pollution of the environment, soil hypoxia, nutritional imbalance, inconvenient transportation, etc.) [14,15,16]. To address these challenges, it is essential to implement proper composting, handling, enrichment, and application techniques. These measures are crucial for mitigating risks and ensuring the safe and effective utilization of poultry manure as an organic fertilizer. Various technologies exist for processing poultry manure into value-added products, with biological treatment methods like composting or anaerobic digestion being the most commonly used [14]. Conversion of poultry manure into compost has shown potential for soil and environmental applications, but it can also result in N loss through ammonia emission, ranging from 13 to 70% [17, 18]. The pyrolysis of poultry manure into biochar has also demonstrated potential for soil and environmental applications, although it has yet to be widely implemented and scaled up to operational installations [19, 20]. Biochar has been shown to mitigate ammonia emissions and N loss during poultry manure composting [21, 22]. Typically, poultry manure contains 1–14% carbon, resulting in a C:N ratio of 6–7 [23]. Hence, optimal utilization of poultry manure or poultry manure compost as a soil organic fertilizer may necessitate the addition of an external carbon source such as biochar to mitigate N and P loss through leaching. In addition, the utilization of biochar as a soil amendment has garnered increased attention in recent years, attributed to its significant contributions in mitigating climate change, enhancing soil fertility, improving water use efficiency, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and boosting crop production [24]. Biochar application also improves soil conditions, fostering beneficial microorganisms like plant growth-promoting bacteria. These bacteria improve nutrient availability and produce plant growth-stimulating compounds, boosting plant performance, especially under drought stress [25,26,27].

Soil microorganisms, like Trichoderma spp., play key roles in soil functions, promoting plant growth by enhancing organic matter decomposition, nutrient availability, and soil enzyme activity. They thrive in the rhizosphere, stimulating nutrient mineralization and improving plant performance through increased nutrient absorption [28, 29].

Studies have explored methods to improve plant nutrition in calcareous soils. The use of acidic materials like sulfuric acid and elemental sulfur is a practical and effective approach, enhancing nutrient uptake by reducing soil pH around the roots. When elemental sulfur is applied, soil microorganisms (e.g., Thiobacillus bacteria) oxidize it to produce sulfuric acid, boosting nutrient absorption and plant growth [30].

The research addresses the pressing need for sustainable agricultural practices in the face of climate change-induced water scarcity. By combining poultry manure compost with poultry manure biochar, NPK fertilizer, Trichoderma harzianum, and Thiobacillus thioparus along with elemental sulfur, the study aimed to investigate the combined effects of these amendments on some morphological and physiological properties of the biomass of lemon balm under water deficit stress in calcareous soil. The goal was to assess the feasibility and sustainability of these combined treatments and to contribute to innovative strategies for sustainable agriculture in drought-prone environments. The innovation lies in the holistic approach of integrating multiple amendments to optimize soil fertility, water retention, and plant resilience. We hypothesized that poultry manure compost enriched with various biological and non-biological modifiers can improve the morphological and physiological properties of lemon balm biomass by mitigating water deficit stress.

Materials and methods

Soil collection and analysis

Soil samples were collected from the top 30 cm layer at the research farm of the Faculty of Agriculture of Lorestan University, Iran. After air-drying and passing through a two-millimeter sieve, various physical and chemical soil characteristics were determined (Table S1). Soil texture was analyzed using the hydrometer method [31], organic matter content was assessed via the wet oxidation method [32], and soil pH was measured in saturated paste extracts [33]. Electrical conductivity (EC) of saturated extracts was determined using an electrical conductivity meter [34], while soil cation exchange capacity was calculated according to a previous study [35]. Calcium carbonate equivalent was determined through acid neutralization [36], and available P was extracted with sodium bicarbonate [37]. Total N was measured via the Kjeldahl method [38], and cationic elements (Fe, Zn, Cu, and Mn) were extracted using the DTPA method [39]. Potassium content was determined by extraction with ammonium acetate, and readings were taken using a flame photometer [40].

Preparation of poultry manure compost and poultry manure biochar

Poultry manure compost and poultry manure biochar were prepared using poultry manure supplied from the complex of broiler breeding farms in Khorram Abad, Iran. The composting process was carried out aerobically according to a previous study [41]. The poultry manure was converted into biochar following a previously established method [42], with the conversion process conducted at a temperature of 300 °C. Subsequently, the compost and biochar derived from poultry manure were ground, and several chemical and physical characteristics were analyzed (Table S2). The pH and EC were measured in a one-to-ten ratio of samples to water [43], while organic carbon content was determined using the wet oxidation method [32], and total N was assessed via the Kjeldahl method [38]. Moreover, the functional groups of biochar were identified using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and its morphology was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Fig. 1Sa-d). For chemical analysis, 1 g of each sample was ashed individually in an electric furnace at 400 °C for four hours, dissolved in 2 N hydrochloric acid, and filtered with distilled water. The concentrations of Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu were determined using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer, K concentration was measured with a flame photometer, and P concentration was determined using the ammonium molybdate vanadate method [44].

Preparation of fungal and bacterial inoculum

Trichoderma harzianum (1 × 107 spores mL−1) was obtained from the Gene Bank of the Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Lorestan University, Iran. To initiate the inoculum, 500 g of wheat grains were combined with 500 mL of distilled water in one-liter jars. Subsequently, the jars underwent autoclaving for two consecutive days at 121 °C and a pressure of 1 atmosphere to ensure sterilization. Following cooling under sterile conditions, 107 spores of T. harzianum per milliliter or 4 plugs of 2 cm from the margin of actively growing T. harzianum culture were added to each jar containing sterilized wheat seeds. The inoculated jars were then stored at 25 °C and incubated until complete coverage of all culture media by T. harzianum was achieved. Daily gentle shaking of the flasks ensured uniform fungal growth. The prepared inoculum was used as a powder [45]. The inoculum of T. thioparus bacterum, in powder form with a population of 108 CFU g−1, was obtained from the Biology Department of the Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center of Golestan province, Iran.

Experimental set up and treatments

This study was conducted in 2021 at the research greenhouse of the Faculty of Agriculture, Lorestan University, Iran. The experiment followed a factorial design based on a completely randomized setup with three replications. In this assessment, poultry manure compost was enriched with poultry manure biochar, T. harzianum, T. thioparus + elemental sulfur, and NPK chemical fertilizers, either separately or in combination. Each fertilizer package (consisting of poultry manure compost with other modifiers, combined or separate) was added to pots containing 4 kg of soil at a rate of half a percent, equivalent to 20 tons per hectare. The experimental treatments comprised three levels of water deficit stress (95–100 (D0), 75–80 (D1), and 55–60 (D2) percent of field capacity) and eleven soil amendment treatments as fertilizer, including: control (F0); poultry manure compost (0.5%,w/w) (F1); F1 + poultry manure biochar (10% of poultry manure compost) (F2); F1 + T. harzianum (0.5% of poultry manure compost) (F3); F1 + T. thioparus (0.5% of poultry manure compost) + sulfur (5.5% of poultry manure compost) (F4); F1 + NPK chemical fertilizer (F5); F1 + poultry manure biochar + T. harzianum (F6); F1 + poultry manure biochar + T. thioparus + sulfur (F7); F1 + poultry manure biochar + NPK chemical fertilizer (F8); F1 + poultry manure biochar + T. harzianum + T. thioparus + sulfur (F9); and F1 + poultry manure biochar + T. harzianum + T. thioparus + Sulfur + NPK chemical fertilizer (F10). NPK chemical fertilizers were sourced from urea, triple superphosphate, and potassium sulfate, respectively, with each fertilizer applied at a rate of 50 kg per hectare.

To carry out the experiment, the soil was mixed with 0.5% by weight of various fertilizer treatments. After thorough mixing, the soil was then transferred to 4 kg pots, which are plastic pots weighing 210 ± 10 g when empty, with a diameter of 15.5 cm and a height of 18 cm. Except for NPK chemical fertilizer, the other modifiers were thoroughly mixed with poultry manure compost and added to pots containing soil. The mixture was then well-incorporated and incubated at 25 °C for 20 days. During the incubation period, experimental treatments were weighed every two days, and any weight loss due to water evaporation was compensated by adding water. Following the incubation period, one healthy lemon balm sprout obtained from Specialized Service Center for Production and Propagation of Medicinal Plants, Lorestan University, Iran, were planted in each pot containing the respective treatments. This wild plant (with herbarium code of Lu1000) was identified botanically by Dr. Faraj Allah Tarnian at the Pasture and Watershed Management, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran.

Initially, to prevent potential nutrient deficiencies based on the soil test results, zinc, copper, and iron were incorporated into the soil at rates of 150, 1, 2, and 5 mg kg−1 soil, respectively, sourced from zinc sulfate, copper sulfate, and iron sequestrene as a solution, respectively. Water deficit stress was not imposed until the six-leaf stage. Following this stage, irrigation was conducted daily throughout the growing season to maintain soil moisture levels consistent with the specified values. Daily measurements of pot weights were recorded using a digital scale to calculate moisture levels. This involved comparing the initial weight of each pot (on the day of watering) with its daily weight. Irrigation adjustments were made as necessary to address any soil water deficiencies according to the assigned treatments. It is important to note that by positioning a series of pots without plants alongside those containing plants, we were able to measure the water required to maintain moisture levels based on the weight of the empty pots. This method effectively accounts for water loss due to evaporation and other factors (transpiration and absorption), eliminating the interference of the increasing weight of the plants as they grow. The average daily temperature ranged from 25 °C to 32 °C, while the night temperature ranged from 20 °C to 16 °C. Relative humidity levels were maintained between 60 and 70%. Light intensity in the greenhouse was measured at 400–500 micromoles per square meter per second. The length of the plant growth period in greenhouse was seven months.

Measurements

At the end of the experiment, the height of lemon balm plant was measured using a ruler. The shoot of the plant was harvested from the soil surface using garden shears, immediately transferred to the laboratory. The plant material was first washed with tap water and then rinsed with distilled water. To determine the dry weight, the plant material (shoot and root) was placed in a paper envelope and dried in an oven at 65 °C for 72 h. After the drying period, the dry weight was also measured using a digital scale accurate to 0.001 g.

Chlorophyll (a and b) and carotenoid were measured according to a previous method [46]. The chlorophyll fluorescence of the plants was quantified using a fluorimeter device (Hanon tech, Pocket PEA, England), and the maximum PSII quantum efficiency (Fm/Fv) was subsequently computed [47]. Gas exchange parameters were assessed in the upper leaves using a portable gas exchange measuring device (CI-340 model, USA). Measurements included photosynthesis (Pn) in micromoles of carbon dioxide per square meter per second, stomatal conductance (gs) in millimoles of water per square meter per second, CO2 concentration within the stomatal chamber (Ci) in micromoles per mole, and transpiration (E) in millimoles of water per square meter per second. Data collection occurred between 9 to 11 a.m. on the most developed upper leaf in each replicate. Each leaf was placed in the gas exchange chamber for 60 s, with room temperatures maintained between 20 °C to 30 °C.

To assess the relative water content of the leaves, a sample was chosen from the growing young leaves. Initially, the fresh weight of the sample was measured. Subsequently, the sample was immersed in distilled water for 24 h, and the rehydrated weight was recorded. For the determination of the dry weight, the sample was oven-dried for 48 h at 80 °C. Finally, the relative water content of the leaf was calculated using these measurements [48]. In order to assess the electrolyte leakage of leaf cells, discs of uniform size were prepared and washed with distilled water. These samples were then placed in glass tubes filled with 10 mL of distilled water. After 24 h, the electrical conductivity of the solution was measured using an electrical conductivity meter. Subsequently, the tube containing the sample was subjected to autoclaving at 120 °C for 20 min. Following a cooldown period, the electrical conductivity was measured once more. Finally, the percentage of electrolyte leakage was calculated based on these measurements [49]. To measure malondialdehyde concentration, 0.5 g fresh leaf tissue was ground with 5 mL 20% trichloroacetic acid and 0.5% thiobarbiotic. The extract was centrifuged, then heated at 80 °C for 25 min, cooled, and centrifuged again. The malondialdehyde-thiobarbiotic rust-red substance was measured at 532 nm using a spectrophotometer. Other pigments' absorption was read at 600 nm. Malondialdehyde concentration was calculated in micromoles per gram of leaf fresh weight [50]. For catalase enzyme extraction, 1.5 mL of potassium phosphate buffer with PVP and EDTA was mixed with 0.3 g of powdered leaf tissue. The resulting suspension underwent centrifugation for 20 min at 14,000 rpm and 4 °C. The enzyme assay was conducted at a wavelength of 240 nm, monitoring optical absorption changes at 10-s intervals. Enzyme activity was determined by the amount of hydrogen peroxide inactivated per minute per gram of leaf tissue [51]. For peroxidase enzyme extraction, 1.5 mL of pH 7 potassium phosphate buffer was added to 0.3 g of powdered leaf tissue. After centrifugation for 20 min at 14,000 rpm and 4 °C, the peroxidase enzyme activity was monitored by measuring light absorption changes every 10 s for two minutes at 475 nm. The enzyme activity was quantified based on the inactivation of oxygen in one minute per gram of fresh tissue weight [52].

Data statistical analysis

Data statistical analysis (two way-ANOVA) was conducted to evaluate the impact of various treatments on various parameterizes measured in this assay. Means were compared using Tukey's test at a significance level of 0.05, facilitated by SAS 9.2 software. Correlation analysis was performed using Pearson's coefficients, and the correlation diagram between traits was created using the R-4.4.0 program. Additionally, principal component analysis and cluster analysis were conducted using the factoextra and heatmaps packages in the same software. Graphical representation of the results was generated using GraphPad Prism 8 software.

Results

Effect on photosynthetic activity

As water deficit stress increased, photosynthesis rates decreased. However, the application of enriched fertilizers, particularly the F10 treatment, positively impacted photosynthetic activity across all moisture levels. Compared to no fertilizer, photosynthesis rates at moisture levels of 95–100% (D0), 75–80% (D1), and 60–55% (D2) increased by 2.28, 2.24, and 2.34 times, respectively. The highest photosynthesis rate—28.13 μmol m⁻2 s⁻1—was recorded under no stress with F10 fertilizer, while the lowest (10.86 μmol m⁻2 s⁻1) occurred at the 55–60% stress level without fertilizer (Fig. 1A). Chlorophyll a content decreased with increasing stress across all fertilizer treatments, although F10 application significantly enhanced chlorophyll a levels compared to no fertilizer. Increases were observed with F10 application at 52.41%, 55.41%, and 60.00% for water levels D0, D1, and D2, respectively (Fig. 1B). The highest chlorophyll a content (10.14 mg g⁻1 leaf fresh weight) was noted at 95–100% field capacity with F10, whereas the lowest (5.696 mg g⁻1 leaf fresh weight) was observed at D2 without fertilizer. Chlorophyll b content also followed a similar trend, declining with greater stress, but the negative effects were mitigated by fertilizer treatments, particularly F10, which increased chlorophyll b levels by 24.44%, 22.20%, and 31.69% for D0, D1, and D2 (Fig. 1C). The highest chlorophyll b content (5.961 mg g⁻1 leaf fresh weight) was observed under no stress with F10, compared to the lowest (4.250 mg g⁻1 leaf fresh weight) at the D2 stress level without fertilizer. Carotenoid levels similarly decreased under stress. However, F10 fertilizer produced the most favorable results, with increases of 77.54%, 75.59%, and 94.97% at moisture levels D0, D1, and D2 (Fig. 1D). The peak carotenoid content (3.107 mg g⁻1 fresh weight) was achieved without stress using F10. The lowest was found at the D2 level without fertilizer (1.414 mg g⁻1 fresh weight).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effect of fertilizer treatments on photosynthesis rate (A), chlorophyll a (B), chlorophyll b (C), and carotenoids (D) of lemon balm under water deficit D0, water holding capacity at 95–100 percent of field capacity; D1, water holding capacity at 75–80 percent of field capacity; D2, water holding capacity at 55–60 percent of field capacity; control (F0); poultry manure compost (F1); F1 + poultry manure biochar (10% of poultry manure compost) (F2); F1 + T. harzianum (F3); F1 + T. thioparus + sulfur (F4); F1 + NPK chemical fertilizer (F5); F1 + poultry manure biochar + T. harzianum (F6); F1 + poultry manure biochar + T. thioparus + sulfur (F7); F1 + poultry manure biochar + NPK chemical fertilizer (F8); F1 + poultry manure biochar + T. harzianum + T. thioparus + sulfur (F9); and F1 + poultry manure biochar + T. harzianum + T. thioparus + Sulfur + NPK chemical fertilizer (F10). The means ± SD (n = 3) that share the same letters are not significantly different as determined by Tukey’s multiple range test at a significance level of p < 0.05

Water deficit stress resulted in increased sub-stomatal CO2 concentrations, while enriched fertilizers lowered these levels. With the F10 treatment, sub-stomatal CO2 decreased by 50.77%, 49.82%, and 43.03% at moisture levels D0, D1, and D2 (Fig. 2A). The highest concentration (361 µmol mol⁻1) occurred without fertilizer at D2, while the lowest (169 µmol mol⁻1) was seen with F10 at D0. Quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fm/Fv) declined under stress but improved with F10 application—18.53%, 17.09%, and 16.15% increases at D0, D1, and D2 compared to no fertilizer (Fig. 2B). The highest efficiency was recorded at D0 with F10. The influence of water deficit stress on stomatal conductance was significant; however, fertilizer application enhanced this trait. Both D1 and D2 significantly reduced stomatal conductance, while all fertilizer levels showed improvement over the control treatment, most notably with F10 (Fig. 2C and D).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect of fertilizer treatments on substomatal CO2 concentration (A) and quantum efficiency of photosystem II (B) of lemon balm under water deficit stress and the effect of water deficit stress and fertilizer treatments on stomatal conductance (C and D) of lemon balm. Refer to the caption of Fig. 1 for a description of the treatments. The means ± SD (n = 3) that share the same letters are not significantly different as determined by Tukey’s multiple range test at a significance level of p < 0.05

Similarly, while water deficit stress substantially decreased transpiration rates, the application of F10 fertilizer significantly boosted these rates. Each fertilizer level surpassed the control treatment, but no significant differences were found between lower fertilizer levels and the control (Fig. 3A and B). The interaction of water deficit stress and fertilizer treatments showed no significant effect on leaf relative water content (p < 0.05). Water deficit stress led to notable reductions in leaf relative water content, with D1 and D2 resulting in decreases of 3.43% and 7.48% compared to the control treatment (no stress). Application of enriched fertilizers increased relative leaf water content significantly, with F1 through F10 demonstrating increases ranging from 6.87% to 18.69% compared to controls (F0), with the highest relative water content recorded in the F10 treatment, although not significantly different from F9 (Fig. 3C and D).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of water deficit stress and fertilizer treatments on transpiration rate (A and B) and leaf relative water content (C and D) of lemon balm. Refer to the caption of Fig. 1 for a description of the treatments. The means ± SD (n = 3) that share the same letters are not significantly different as determined by Tukey’s multiple range test at a significance level of p < 0.05

Effects on oxidant and antioxidant activity

The interaction between water deficit stress and fertilizer treatment demonstrated that malondialdehyde levels increased with water deficit stress, while fertilizer applications, particularly the F10 treatment, effectively reduced malondialdehyde levels in plants (Fig. 4A). At moisture levels of 95–100% (D0), 75–80% (D1), and 55–60% (D2) of field capacity, malondialdehyde levels decreased by 49.95%, 47.37%, and 46.56%, respectively, with F10 compared to no fertilizer application at the same moisture levels. The highest malondialdehyde concentration (4.793 µmol g⁻1 fresh weight) was observed at the D2 stress level without fertilizer, while the lowest (2.187 µmol g⁻1 fresh weight) occurred under no stress with F10 treatment (Fig. 4A).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of fertilizer treatments on malondialdehyde (A), catalase activity (B), and peroxidase activity (C) of lemon balm under water deficit stress and the effect of water deficit stress on electrolyte leakage (D) of lemon balm. Refer to the caption of Fig. 1 for a description of the treatments. The means ± SD (n = 3) that share the same letters are not significantly different as determined by Tukey’s multiple range test at a significance level of p < 0.05

Catalase activity increased in response to both water deficit stress and fertilizer treatments. Among the fertilizers, F10 led to the most significant enhancement in catalase activity, which increased by 2.10, 2.49, and 2.31 times at moisture levels D0, D1, and D2, respectively, compared to no fertilizer application. The highest catalase enzyme activity was noted at the D2 stress level with F10 (2.442 μmol min⁻1 fresh weight), while the lowest activity (0.840 μmol min⁻1 fresh weight) was recorded under no stress with no fertilizer (Fig. 4B). Peroxidase enzyme activity also increased with water deficit stress and fertilizer applications. The F10 fertilizer exhibited the most substantial impact, resulting in increased peroxidase activity by 1.79, 1.97, and 2.07 times at D0, D1, and D2, respectively, compared to controls. The maximum peroxidase activity was observed at D2 with F10 treatment (2.754 μmol min⁻1 fresh weight), while the minimum (1.177 μmol min⁻1 fresh weight) was seen in the control group without fertilizer (Fig. 4C).

The interaction between water deficit stress and fertilizer treatments did not significantly affect ion leakage (p < 0.05). Electrolyte leakage increased with drought stress, particularly at stress levels D1 and D2, which exhibited increases of 3% and 4.06%, respectively, compared to the no stress control. Conversely, enriched fertilizer treatments reduced electrolyte leakage significantly, with reductions of 4.20% to 24.69% across different fertilizer levels compared to controls. However, no significant differences were found between the F1 treatment and the control (Fig. 4D and Fig. 5A).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effect of fertilizer treatments on electrolyte leakage (A) of lemon balm and effect of fertilizer treatments on height (B), shoot dry weight (C), and root dry weight (D) of lemon balm under water deficit stress. Refer to the caption of Fig. 1 for a description of the treatments. The means ± SD (n = 3) that share the same letters are not significantly different as determined by Tukey’s multiple range test at a significance level of p < 0.05

Effect on plant biomass

The interaction between water deficit stress and fertilizer treatments revealed that plant height decreased under stress, while fertilizer applications, particularly F10, significantly enhanced this trait (Fig. 5B). At moisture levels of 95–100% (D0), 75–80% (D1), and 60–55% (D2), plant height increased by 2.76, 2.72, and 2.12 times, respectively, with F10 compared to no fertilizer. The maximum height (38 cm) was observed at D0 with F10, while the minimum (17 cm) occurred at D2 without fertilizer. Water deficit stress also reduced shoot dry weight (Fig. 5C). However, all fertilizer treatments improved shoot dry weight, with F10 showing the most significant effects, increasing dry weight by 2.76, 2.72, and 2.71 times at D0, D1, and D2, respectively. The highest dry weight (76.6 g pot⁻1) was recorded at D0 with F10, while the lowest (24.73 g pot⁻1) was at D2 without fertilizer. Root dry weight decreased under water deficit stress, but fertilizer treatments mitigated these negative impacts. F10 significantly increased root dry weight by 2.31, 2.36, and 2.51 times at D0, D1, and D2, respectively (Fig. 5D). The highest root dry weight (50.5 g pot⁻1) was at D0 with F10, with no significant difference from F9. The lowest root weight (17.43 g pot⁻1) was observed at D2 without fertilizer, showing no significant difference from D1. In conclusion, the application of enriched fertilizers, especially F10, significantly enhanced plant biomass under water deficit stress levels (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

An image depicting lemon balm plant growth under varying levels of water deficit stress, both with and without the application of a soil amendment (F10) and the effects of water deficit stress and the soil amendment on the morphophysiological parameters measured in this study. Upward arrows represent an increasing effect, while downward arrows indicate a decreasing effect

Correlation and principal component analysis

The correlation analysis revealed that sub-stomatal CO2 concentration, malondialdehyde, and electrolyte leakage exhibited positive correlations among themselves while negatively correlating with other traits. The strongest positive correlations were found between chlorophyll a content and photosynthesis rate (r = 0.96), plant height and shoot dry weight (r = 0.96), and transpiration rate with stomatal conductance (r = 0.96). Conversely, the most significant negative correlation occurred between stomatal conductance and sub-stomatal CO2 concentration (r = -0.97), indicating that reduced stomatal conductance corresponds with an increase in CO2 concentration (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Pearson’s correlation analysis of the impacts of fertilizer fertilizers on morphophysiological parameters of lemon balm in this study under different levels of water deficit stress. CO2: substomatal CO2 concentration, MDA: malondialdehyde, EL: electrolyte leakage, Per: peroxidase activity, Cat: catalase activity, Fv-Fm: quantum efficiency of photosystem II, Tr: transpiration rate, SC: stomatal conductance, DS: shoot dry weight, H, plant height, RP: photosynthesis rate, Chl_B: chlorophyll b, Chl_A: chlorophyll a, DR: root dry weight, CAR: carotenoids, and RWC: leaf relative water content

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) showed that the first component accounted for over 80% of the variation in the data, with the first and second components together explaining 91.7% of the total variance. This allowed for more confident interpretation of the results. The PCA indicated two distinct groups of traits differentiated by the first component, with sub-stomatal CO2 concentration, malondialdehyde, and electrolyte leakage forming one group, while other traits formed a second group. The closely aligned vectors for catalase and peroxidase indicated minimal variation in response to treatments (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Principal component analysis (PCA) based on treatments and studied parameters. Refer to the caption of Fig. 7 for a description of the parameters

In the biplot analysis, treatments such as F7D2, F8D2, F6D1, and F6D2 were positioned near the origin, indicating minimal effects on traits. In contrast, treatments like F10D0, F9D0, F10D1, F10D2, F0D2, F9D2, and F10D2 exerted more significant impacts and were located further from the origin (Fig. 9). The first component effectively separated factor F levels, with negative values corresponding to treatments F0 through F4 and positive values for treatments F6 through F10. The second component distinguished factor D levels, with D0, D1, and D2 showing negative, zero, and positive values, respectively.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Distribution of the studied treatments using principal component analysis (PCA). Refer to the caption of Fig. 1 for a description of the treatments

Cluster analysis further categorized the studied traits into two groups. The first group consisted of sub-stomatal CO2 concentration, malondialdehyde, and electrolyte leakage, while the second group included the remaining traits. Treatments grouped into four clusters, with specific treatments exhibiting varying traits: F10D1 and similar treatments had lower trait values, while treatments F0D2, F1D2, and F0D1 showed higher averages for CO2 concentration and related traits but lower values for the others (Fig. 10). The findings highlight the complex interrelations among physiological traits and their responses to different treatments. Significant correlations and clear separations among traits suggest targeted avenues for further research on optimizing plant responses to environmental conditions.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Heatmap analysis for grouping the studied treatments and measured parameters in this study. Refer to the caption of Fig. 1 and 7 for a description of the treatments and measured parameters in this study, respectively

Discussion

This study explored the integration of various soil amendments to mitigate water deficit stress in lemon balm, a valuable medicinal plant, through a comprehensive greenhouse experiment. Water deficit stress is a primary challenge for agriculture, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions, where it can dramatically affect lemon balm growth and physiological functions [53, 54]. Our findings underscore the potential of combining organic, biological, and chemical amendments to enhance the resilience of lemon balm under water deficit conditions.

A reduction in water availability significantly disrupts plant functioning by impairing physiological activities [55]. Photosynthetic pigments like chlorophyll and carotenoids are vital indicators of plant health and growth, with their levels directly affecting photosynthesis [56]. Drought reduces chlorophyll and carotenoid content by inhibiting biosynthetic enzymes and increasing oxidative stress due to free radicals [57, 58]. Our findings confirmed that fertilizer treatments significantly improved pigment levels under water deficit stress, with organic fertilizers enhancing the availability of essential nutrients for chlorophyll synthesis [59, 60]. According to previous studies, organic fertilizers such as poultry manure compost and poultry manure biochar enhance the availability of essential nutrients for chlorophyll synthesis through several synergistic mechanisms. These organic amendments improve the release and retention of key nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in the soil. Biochar, in particular, possesses a high cation exchange capacity, which aids in retaining nutrients and preventing their leaching, thereby making them more accessible to plants [61]. Additionally, the incorporation of biochar and compost stimulates microbial activity, which is crucial for the mineralization of organic matter. This microbial process releases nutrients in forms that plants can readily absorb, enhancing nitrification and nitrogen availability [62]. Furthermore, biochar improves soil structure by increasing porosity and water retention, facilitating better root growth and nutrient uptake, which are essential for chlorophyll synthesis. Microorganisms like Trichoderma enhance nutrient absorption and chlorophyll levels [63, 64] by solubilizing phosphorus and other nutrients, thereby increasing their availability to plants [65]. This effect is particularly beneficial when using organic amendments such as poultry manure compost and biochar, which can be enriched with nutrients through microbial activity. Additionally, Trichoderma spp. boost soil enzyme activities, including phosphatase, facilitating the mineralization of organic phosphorus and improving nutrient uptake by plants [65]. Their presence also alters the soil microbial community, promoting beneficial microbes that enhance nutrient cycling and availability, especially in soils amended with organic materials like poultry manure [62]. The sulfur supplied in fertilizers aids in amino acid production vital for chlorophyll synthesis and overall plant health [66].

Drought stress lowers stomatal conductance, restricting CO2 supply and subsequently limiting photosynthesis and plant growth. Abscisic acid levels increase in response to drought, leading to stomatal closure [67, 68]. Interestingly, enriched compost improved stomatal conductance, likely due to enhanced root growth and water access resulting from organic fertilizers [69]. Transpiration rates are crucial for understanding water uptake. Under drought, stomata close to conserve water, leading to reduced transpiration and photosynthesis. Our study highlighted that prolonged drought stress can severely diminish photosynthetic efficiency and biomass through stomatal closure [70]. According to previous studies, the soils treated with compost and biochar also enhanced leaf photosynthetic efficiency, promoting increased Rubisco activity and carbohydrate production [71, 72]. Based on the findings of previous studies, compost and biochar enhance photosynthetic efficiency through several key mechanisms. Biochar improves soil structure by increasing porosity and water retention, facilitating better root growth and nutrient uptake, which are essential for photosynthesis. It also adsorbs nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus, crucial for chlorophyll synthesis. Compost enriches the soil with organic matter, boosting microbial activity and nutrient cycling. Together, these amendments improve microbial communities, reduce nutrient losses, and enhance nutrient availability, collectively contributing to greater photosynthetic efficiency in plants [73,74,75].

Substomatal CO2 concentrations reflected reduced carbon fixation due to drought stress, indicating damage to the photosynthetic apparatus [76]. However, the application of various fertilizers improved stomatal conductivity, leading to a decrease in substomatal CO2 levels, suggesting a recovery in photosynthetic function during optimal conditions. The Fv/Fm index is a critical measure of photosynthetic capacity under stress, and drought negatively impacts this metric due to damage to Photosystem II (PSII) [77, 78]. Supplementing soil fertility enhances chlorophyll synthesis and stabilizes thylakoid membranes, which are crucial for efficient photosynthesis. Adequate nutrients, particularly nitrogen, are essential for producing chlorophyll, allowing plants to capture light energy more effectively. Additionally, a nutrient-rich environment helps maintain the integrity of thylakoid membranes, ensuring optimal functioning of the photosynthetic machinery. This stability leads to reduced chlorophyll fluorescence, a stress indicator that increases when plants face nutrient deficiencies. By maintaining soil fertility, plants experience less stress, which allows them to sustain higher photosynthetic efficiency and overall productivity [79, 80]. Organic fertilizers, like enriched poultry compost, enhance micronutrient absorption, which is vital for photosynthesis, even under drought conditions. These fertilizers provide essential micronutrients such as zinc, iron, and manganese, which play critical roles in chlorophyll synthesis and enzyme functions related to photosynthesis. The organic matter in poultry compost improves soil structure and water retention, helping plants access moisture more effectively during dry periods. Additionally, the microbial activity stimulated by compost aids in the solubilization and availability of these micronutrients, ensuring that plants can uptake the necessary elements for optimal photosynthetic performance. This combination of improved nutrient availability and enhanced soil health allows plants to maintain photosynthesis even when water is limited [81, 82].

Relative water content (RWC) serves as a crucial indicator of drought tolerance. Plants under drought typically experience reduced RWC, leading to diminished photosynthesis and severe physiological effects [83, 84]. Our study revealed that both simple and enriched compost positively influenced RWC, showing the highest improvements with organic and biological amendments. Compost and biochar improved soil structure and moisture retention, ultimately supporting higher leaf RWC [85, 86]. Enhanced RWC promotes better nutrient absorption and overall plant health, critical for drought resistance [87, 88]. Membrane integrity, indicated by ion leakage, is essential in assessing plant stress response. Drought induces elevated reactive oxygen species levels, leading to increased ion leakage and cell membrane damage [89]. Our findings showed that enriched compost reduced ion leakage, indicating improved membrane stability. Trichoderma also contributed to maintaining membrane integrity through enhanced antioxidant activity, minimizing ion leakage [90, 91]. Paryan et al. [92] also reported that the application of farmyard manure under drought stress enhances plant growth while reducing electrolyte leakage and protein content in maize tissues and grains.

Water deficit also enhances reactive oxygen species stress in plants by elevating the production of catalase, superoxide dismutase, ascorbate peroxidase, peroxidase, and phenolic compounds [55, 93]. Catalase and peroxidase enzymes play pivotal roles in detoxifying hydrogen peroxide, particularly under drought-induced stress [94, 95]. The present study also revealed a significant increase in the production of antioxidants, specifically catalase and peroxidase, under conditions of water deficit stress. A similar response was noted by Cia et al. [96] and Hussain and Shah [97], where drought-stressed plants exhibited higher levels of catalase and ascorbate peroxidase compared to drought non-stressed plants. These reactive oxygen species generate hydrogen peroxide, which disrupts plant physiological activities through the subsequent production of hydroxyl radicals. These uncharged hydroxyl radicals react with cell membranes, leading to the formation of malondialdehyde compounds [98]. Malondialdehyde content served as a marker for oxidative stress, and increased malondialdehyde levels indicated significant cell damage during drought [99]. The application of compost reduced malondialdehyde levels, suggesting improved antioxidant defenses against oxidative stress [100]. This aligns with findings that organic fertilizers enhance photosynthetic capacity while mitigating oxidative damage [101]. Our study showed that the application of enriched compost significantly elevated these antioxidant enzyme activities, enhancing the plant's ability to cope with oxidative stress [27, 102]. A study on rice plants also found that microbial inoculation with Trichoderma and Pseudomonas reduced drought stress effects. This treatment increased the activity of antioxidant enzymes such as peroxidase, ascorbate peroxidase, and glutathione reductase, demonstrating that microbial inoculants can enhance the biochemical and molecular resilience of rice plants under drought conditions [103]. The synergistic benefits of organic fertilizers and beneficial microorganisms like Trichoderma strengthen the plant’s defense mechanisms against drought-induced oxidative damage, enhancing resilience [104]. The increase in antioxidant enzyme activity in response to drought stress and further enhancement by various modifiers suggests that these treatments could be effective strategies for improving plant resilience under challenging conditions. This aligns with the concept of stress acclimatization, where plants adapt to their environment through physiological and biochemical changes.

Water deficit stress also significantly affected plant growth metrics, including plant biomass (shoot and root dry weights) and height, due to limited photosynthesis and stomatal closure [105]. In previous studies, biochar, farmyard manure, and poultry manure enriched with mineral nutrients also promoted root hair development and expanded the root exploration area, facilitating enhanced water uptake [55, 92, 97]. Notably, biochar application yielded significantly better results compared to farmyard manure, and poultry manure, likely due to its superior nutrient retention capacity. Additionally, biochar enhances soil hydro-physical properties, contributing to improved overall soil health [106, 107].

Overall, the combination of poultry manure compost enriched with poultry manure biochar, T. harzianum, T. thioparus, sulfur, and NPK fertilizer effectively mitigated water deficit stress on lemon balm through several mechanisms. According to the findings of previous studies, poultry manure compost enriches the soil with nutrients and improves soil structure, enhancing water retention and microbial activity, which supports plant growth during drought [95]. Poultry manure biochar enhances soil aeration and moisture retention, reducing nutrient leaching and improving nutrient availability [108]. T. harzianum promotes root development and nutrient uptake, particularly phosphorus, while producing growth-promoting substances that help plants tolerate stress [109]. Thiobacillus thioparus converts elemental sulfur into sulfate, making sulfur more available, which is essential for synthesizing amino acids and proteins vital for stress response [110]. Sulfur enhances chlorophyll production, supporting photosynthesis [111], while NPK fertilizer provides a balanced supply of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, promoting overall plant health [112, 113]. Together, these components create a synergistic effect, boosting lemon balm's morpho-physiological properties and biomass, allowing the plants to better withstand water deficit stress. This research highlights the efficacy of integrated soil amendments in enhancing plant performance and offers insights for sustainable agriculture in water-scarce environments.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the effectiveness of integrating multiple soil amendments to mitigate the adverse effects of water deficit stress on lemon balm. The combined application of poultry manure compost, poultry manure biochar, NPK fertilizer, Trichoderma harzianumThiobacillus thioparus, and elemental sulfur significantly enhanced the plant’s morpho-physiological properties and overall biomass, particularly under moderate water deficit conditions (75–80% of field capacity). The results revealed that under these moderate drought conditions, the synergistic effects of these amendments dramatically improved chlorophyll content, photosynthesis rates, stomatal conductance, and antioxidant enzyme activity, thereby reinforcing the plant’s resilience to stress. The enhancement of physiological traits was less pronounced under severe drought conditions (55–60% of field capacity), indicating that the integrated amendments are more effective when plants experience moderate water deficits. Overall, these findings emphasize the potential of a holistic approach to soil management, combining organic, biological, and chemical amendments to promote sustainable agriculture and enhance the cultivation of medicinal plants like lemon balm in water-scarce environments. Future research should further explore these integrated strategies and assess their long-term impacts on soil health and plant performance under varying environmental conditions.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Doğan H, Uskutoğlu T, Baş H, Stankov S, Fidan H, Şenkal BC, Stoyanova A, Petkova N, Yılmaz G, Dincheva I: Phytochemical composition of wild lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.) from the flora of Bulgaria. Anatolian Journal of Botany 2021, 5(2):112–119.

  2. Zscheischler J, Westra S, Van Den Hurk BJJM, Seneviratne SI, Ward PJ, Pitman A, AghaKouchak A, Bresch DN, Leonard M, Wahl T. Future climate risk from compound events. Nat Clim Chang. 2018;8(6):469–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ingrao C, Strippoli R, Lagioia G, Huisingh D. Water scarcity in agriculture: An overview of causes, impacts and approaches for reducing the risks. Heliyon. 2023;9(8): e18507.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Seleiman MF, Al-Suhaibani N, Ali N, Akmal M, Alotaibi M, Refay Y, Dindaroglu T, Abdul-Wajid HH, Battaglia ML. Drought stress impacts on plants and different approaches to alleviate its adverse effects. Plants. 2021;10(2):259.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Forotaghe ZA, Souri MK, Jahromi MG, Torkashvand AM. Physiological and biochemical responses of onion plants to deficit irrigation and humic acid application. Open agriculture. 2021;6(1):728–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chrysargyris A, Petropoulos SA, Tzortzakis N. Essential Oil Composition and Bioactive Properties of Lemon Balm Aerial Parts as Affected by Cropping System and Irrigation Regime. Agronomy. 2022;12(3):649.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Oduor N, Kiboi MN, Muriuki A, Adamtey N, Musafiri CM, Ngetich FK. Soil management strategies enhanced crop yield, soil moisture, and water productivity in Nitisols of the Upper Eastern Kenya. Environmental Challenges. 2021;5: 100375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nogues I, Miritana VM, Passatore L, Zacchini M, Peruzzi E, Carloni S, Pietrini F, Marabottini R, Chiti T, Massaccesi L: Biochar soil amendment as carbon farming practice in a Mediterranean environment. Geoderma Regional 2023:e00634.

  9. Geremew A, Carson L, Woldesenbet S, Carpenter C, Peace E, Weerasooriya A. Interactive effects of organic fertilizers and drought stress on growth and nutrient content of Brassica juncea at vegetative stage. Sustainability. 2021;13(24):13948.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kazeminasab A, Yarnia M, Lebaschy MH, Mirshekari B, Rejali F: The effect of vermicompost and PGPR on physiological traits of lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.) plant under drought stress. Journal of Medicinal Plants and By-products 2016, 5(2):135–144.

  11. Shu X, He J, Zhou Z, Xia L, Hu Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Luo Y, Chu H, Liu W. Organic amendments enhance soil microbial diversity, microbial functionality and crop yields: A meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ. 2022;829: 154627.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Franco-Andreu L, Gómez I, Parrado J, García C, Hernández T, Tejada M. Soil biology changes as a consequence of organic amendments subjected to a severe drought. Land Degrad Dev. 2017;28(3):897–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Serri F, Souri MK, Rezapanah M. Growth, biochemical quality and antioxidant capacity of coriander leaves under organic and inorganic fertilization programs. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture. 2021;8:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dróżdż D, Wystalska K, Malińska K, Grosser A, Grobelak A, Kacprzak M. Management of poultry manure in Poland – Current state and future perspectives. J Environ Manage. 2020;264: 110327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Myszograj S, Puchalska E: Waste from rearing and slaughter of poultry–treat to the environment or feedstock for energy. Medycyna Środowiskowa 2012, 15(3).

  16. Manogaran MD, Shamsuddin R, Mohd Yusoff MH, Lay M, Siyal AA. A review on treatment processes of chicken manure. Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy. 2022;2: 100013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hao X, Benke MB. Nitrogen transformation and losses during composting and mitigation strategies. Dynamic Soil, Dynamic Plant. 2008;2(1):10–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shin MS, Jung K-H, Kwag J-H, Jeon Y-W. Biogas separation using a membrane gas separator: Focus on CO2 upgrading without CH4 loss. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2019;129:348–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Składeczek F, Głodek-Bucyk E. Research of using low-temperature pyrolysis for processing of waste biomass to biochar. Sci Work Inst Ceram Build Mater. 2017;28:50–61.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zolfi Bavariani M, Ronaghi A, Ghasemi R. Influence of pyrolysis temperatures on FTIR analysis, nutrient bioavailability, and agricultural use of poultry manure biochars. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2019;50(4):402–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Janczak D, Malińska K, Czekała W, Cáceres R, Lewicki A, Dach J. Biochar to reduce ammonia emissions in gaseous and liquid phase during composting of poultry manure with wheat straw. Waste Manage. 2017;66:36–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sanchez-Monedero MA, Cayuela ML, Roig A, Jindo K, Mondini C, Bolan N. Role of biochar as an additive in organic waste composting. Biores Technol. 2018;247:1155–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Agbede TM, Ojeniyi SO, Adeyemo AJ. Effect of poultry manure on soil physical and chemical properties, growth and grain yield of sorghum in southwest. Nigeria American-Eurasian journal of sustainable agriculture. 2008;2(1):72–7.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sanchez-Reinoso AD, Ávila-Pedraza EA, Restrepo-Díaz H. Use of biochar in agriculture. Acta Biológica Colombiana. 2020;25(2):327–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Marcińczyk M, Oleszczuk P. Biochar and engineered biochar as slow-and controlled-release fertilizers. J Clean Prod. 2022;339: 130685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hagner M, Jauhiainen L, Kemppainen R, Rämö S, Tiilikkala K, Setälä H: Wood biochar is a potential soil amendment to reduce glyphosate leaching in agricultural soils. In: 2015 2015. Hochschule Geisenheim University.

  27. Etesami H, Maheshwari DK. Use of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) with multiple plant growth promoting traits in stress agriculture: Action mechanisms and future prospects. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018;156:225–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang Q-C, Shamsi IH, Xu D-T, Wang G-H, Lin X-Y, Jilani G, Hussain N, Chaudhry AN. Chemical fertilizer and organic manure inputs in soil exhibit a vice versa pattern of microbial community structure. Appl Soil Ecol. 2012;57:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Asghar W, Kataoka R: Effect of co-application of Trichoderma spp. with organic composts on plant growth enhancement, soil enzymes and fungal community in soil. Archives of microbiology 2021, 203(7):4281–4291.

  30. Besharati H. Effects of sulfur application and Thiobacillus inoculation on soil nutrient availability, wheat yield and plant nutrient concentration in calcareous soils with different calcium carbonate content. J Plant Nutr. 2017;40(3):447–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gee GW, Bauder JW. Particle size analysis by hydrometer: a simplified method for routine textural analysis and a sensitivity test of measurement parameters. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1979;43(5):1004–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nelson DW, Sommers LE: Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 Chemical methods 1996, 5:961–1010.

  33. Thomas GW: Soil pH and soil acidity. Methods of soil analysis: part 3 chemical methods 1996, 5:475–490.

  34. Rhoades JD: Salinity: Electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 Chemical methods 1996, 5:417–435.

  35. Sumner ME, Miller WP: Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 Chemical methods 1996, 5:1201–1229.

  36. Loeppert RH, Suarez DL: Carbonate and gypsum. Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 chemical methods 1996, 5:437–474.

  37. Olsen SR: Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate: US Department of Agriculture; 1954.

  38. Bremner JM: Nitrogen‐total. Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 Chemical methods 1996, 5:1085–1121.

  39. Lindsay WL, Norvell W. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1978;42(3):421–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Knudsen D, Peterson GA, Pratt PF: Lithium, sodium, and potassium. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties 1983, 9:225–246.

  41. Farhad W, Cheema MA, Saleem MF, Radovich T, Abbas F, Hammad HM, Wahid MA: Yield and Quality Response of Maize Hybrids to Composted Poultry Manure at Three Irrigation Levels. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology 2013, 15(2).

  42. Zolfi-Bavariani M, Ronaghi A, Ghasemi-Fasaei R, Yasrebi J. Influence of poultry manure–derived biochars on nutrients bioavailability and chemical properties of a calcareous soil. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 2016;62(11):1578–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Singh B, Singh BP, Cowie AL. Characterisation and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment. Soil Research. 2010;48(7):516–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Chapman HD, Pratt PF. Methods of analysis for soils, plants and waters. Soil Sci. 1962;93(1):68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Komala G, Madhavi GB, Nath R. Shelf life studies of different formulations of Trichoderma harzianum. Plant Cell Biotechnol Mol Biol. 2019;20:1100–5.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lichtenthaler HK: [34] Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. In: Methods in enzymology. vol. 148: Elsevier; 1987: 350–382.

  47. Genty B, Briantais J-M, Baker NR: The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-General Subjects 1989, 990(1):87–92.

  48. Ritchie SW, Nguyen HT, Holaday AS. Leaf water content and gas-exchange parameters of two wheat genotypes differing in drought resistance. Crop Sci. 1990;30(1):105–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Lutts S, Kinet J, Bouharmont J: NaCl-induced senescence in leaves of rice (Oryza sativaL.) cultivars differing in salinity resistance. Annals of botany 1996, 78(3):389–398.

  50. Buege JA, Aust SD: [30] Microsomal lipid peroxidation. In: Methods in enzymology. vol. 52: Elsevier; 1978: 302–310.

  51. Chance B, Maehly A: [136] Assay of catalases and peroxidases. 1955.

  52. MacAdam JW, Sharp RE, Nelson CJ: Peroxidase activity in the leaf elongation zone of tall fescue: II. Spatial distribution of apoplastic peroxidase activity in genotypes differing in length of the elongation zone. Plant Physiology 1992, 99(3):879–885.

  53. Szabó K, Radácsi P, Rajhárt P, Ladányi M, Németh É. Stress-induced changes of growth, yield and bioactive compounds in lemon balm cultivars. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017;119:170–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Nikbakht N, Danesh Shahraki A, Koohi Dehkordi M: The effect of drought stress and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on agro-morphological characters of lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.). Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences 2022, 15(2):393–405.

  55. Abideen Z, Koyro HW, Huchzermeyer B, Ansari R, Zulfiqar F, Gul B. Ameliorating effects of biochar on photosynthetic efficiency and antioxidant defence of Phragmites karka under drought stress. Plant Biol. 2020;22(2):259–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Pavlović D, Nikolić B, Đurović S, Waisi H, Anđelković A, Marisavljević D. Chlorophyll as a measure of plant health: Agroecological aspects. Pesticidi i fitomedicina. 2014;29(1):21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Hafez EM, Kheir AM, Badawy SA, Rashwan E, Farig M, Osman HS. Differences in physiological and biochemical attributes of wheat in response to single and combined salicylic acid and biochar subjected to limited water irrigation in saline sodic soil. Plants. 2020;9(10):1346.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Ghorbani A, Omran VOG, Razavi SM, Pirdashti H, Ranjbar M: Piriformospora indica confers salinity tolerance on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) through amelioration of nutrient accumulation, K+/Na+ homeostasis and water status. Plant Cell Reports 2019, 38:1151–1163.

  59. Wei W, Yang H, Fan M, Chen H, Guo D, Cao J, Kuzyakov Y. Biochar effects on crop yields and nitrogen loss depending on fertilization. Sci Total Environ. 2020;702: 134423.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Adejumo S, Owolabi M, Odesola I. Agro-physiologic effects of compost and biochar produced at different temperatures on growth, photosynthetic pigment and micronutrients uptake of maize crop. Afr J Agric Res. 2016;11(8):661–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Subedi R, Taupe N, Ikoyi I, Bertora C, Zavattaro L, Schmalenberger A, Leahy J, Grignani C. Chemically and biologically-mediated fertilizing value of manure-derived biochar. Sci Total Environ. 2016;550:924–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ye J, Zhang R, Nielsen S, Joseph SD, Huang D, Thomas T. A combination of biochar–mineral complexes and compost improves soil bacterial processes, soil quality, and plant properties. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:372.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Rahimi A, Siavash Moghaddam S, Ghiyasi M, Heydarzadeh S, Ghazizadeh K, Popović-Djordjević J: The influence of chemical, organic and biological fertilizers on agrobiological and antioxidant properties of Syrian Cephalaria (Cephalaria syriaca L.). Agriculture 2019, 9(6):122.

  64. Mergawy MM, Metwaly HA, Shoeip AM. Evaluation of the efficacy of some bioagents accompanied with Bio-and Mineral Fertilizers in controlling early blight of tomato and improvement yield. Egyptian Journal of Phytopathology. 2022;50(1):31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Busato J, Ferrari L, Chagas Junior A, da Silva D, dos Santos PT, de Paula A. Trichoderma strains accelerate maturation and increase available phosphorus during vermicomposting enriched with rock phosphate. J Appl Microbiol. 2021;130(4):1208–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Jamal A, Moon Y-S, Zainul Abdin M: Enzyme activity assessment of peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) under slow-release sulphur fertilization. Australian Journal of Crop Science 2010, 4(3):169–174.

  67. Sanchooli N: Effects of different ratios of manure and chemical fertilizer and mixture on soil properties, yield and yield components of corn. 2007.

  68. Khanam D, Mohammad F. Plant growth regulators ameliorate the ill effect of salt stress through improved growth, photosynthesis, antioxidant system, yield and quality attributes in Mentha piperita L. Acta Physiol Plant. 2018;40(11):188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Arif M, Ali K, Jan MT, Shah Z, Jones DL, Quilliam RS. Integration of biochar with animal manure and nitrogen for improving maize yields and soil properties in calcareous semi-arid agroecosystems. Field Crop Res. 2016;195:28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Abdelmoaty S, Khandaker M, Mahmud K, Majrashi A, Alenazi M, Badaluddin N. Influence of Trichoderma harzianum and Bacillus thuringiensis with reducing rates of NPK on growth, physiology, and fruit quality of Citrus aurantifolia. Braz J Biol. 2022;82: e261032.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Fateh H, Siosemardeh A, Karimpoor M, Sharafi S. Effect of drought stress on photosynthesis and physiological characteristics of barley. International Journal of Farming and Allied Sciences. 2012;1(2):33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Bijanzadeh E, Moosavi SM, Bahadori F: Quantifying water stress of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars by crop water stress index under different irrigation regimes. Heliyon 2022, 8(3).

  73. Liu X, Zhang J, Wang Q, Chang T, Shaghaleh H, Hamoud YA: Improvement of Photosynthesis by Biochar and Vermicompost to Enhance Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Yield under Greenhouse Conditions. Plants 2022, 11(23):3214.

  74. Zulfiqar F, Chen J, Younis A, Abideen Z, Naveed M, Koyro HW, Siddique KHM. Biochar, Compost, and Biochar-Compost Blend Applications Modulate Growth, Photosynthesis, Osmolytes, and Antioxidant System of Medicinal Plant Alpinia zerumbet. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12: 707061.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Naveed M, Tanvir B, Xiukang W, Brtnicky M, Ditta A, Kucerik J, Subhani Z, Nazir MZ, Radziemska M, Saeed Q, Mustafa A. Co-composted Biochar Enhances Growth, Physiological, and Phytostabilization Efficiency of Brassica napus and Reduces Associated Health Risks Under Chromium Stress. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12: 775785.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. El–Bially ME, Saudy HS, Hashem FA, El–Gabry YA, Shahin MG: Salicylic acid as a tolerance inducer of drought stress on sunflower grown in sandy soil. Gesunde Pflanzen 2022, 74(3):603–613.

  77. Flexas J, Medrano H. Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C3 plants: stomatal and non-stomatal limitations revisited. Ann Bot. 2002;89(2):183–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Agegnehu G, Bass AM, Nelson PN, Bird MI. Benefits of biochar, compost and biochar–compost for soil quality, maize yield and greenhouse gas emissions in a tropical agricultural soil. Sci Total Environ. 2016;543:295–306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. He Y, Yao Y, Ji Y, Deng J, Zhou G, Liu R, Shao J, Zhou L, Li N, Zhou X. Biochar amendment boosts photosynthesis and biomass in C3 but not C4 plants: A global synthesis. Gcb Bioenergy. 2020;12(8):605–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Guo L, Yu H, Kharbach M, Wang J. The response of nutrient uptake, photosynthesis and yield of tomato to biochar addition under reduced nitrogen application. Agronomy. 2021;11(8):1598.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Gilani A, Abbasdokht H, Gholami A: Effects of Thiobacillus and different levels of sulfur fertilizer on growth and physiological indices in intercropping of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) and Mung Bean (Vigna radiata L.). Gesunde Pflanzen 2021, 73(3):317–333.

  82. Reddy AR, Chaitanya KV, Vivekanandan M. Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. J Plant Physiol. 2004;161(11):1189–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Dalal VK, Tripathy BC. Water-stress induced downsizing of light-harvesting antenna complex protects developing rice seedlings from photo-oxidative damage. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):5955.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Hajizadeh HS, Azizi S, Rasouli F, Okatan V: Modulation of physiological and biochemical traits of two genotypes of Rosa damascena Mill. by SiO2-NPs under In vitro drought stress. BMC Plant Biology 2022, 22(1):538.

  85. Piri E, Babaeian M, Tavassoli A, Esmaeilian Y. Effects of UV irradiation on plants. African journal of microbiology research. 2011;5(14):1710–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Yang W, Li Y, Liu W, Wang S, Yin L, Deng X. Sustainable high yields can be achieved in drylands on the Loess Plateau by changing water use patterns through integrated agronomic management. Agric For Meteorol. 2021;296: 108210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Adak T, Singha A, Kumar K, Shukla S, Singh A, Kumar Singh V. Soil organic carbon, dehydrogenase activity, nutrient availability and leaf nutrient content as affected by organic and inorganic source of nutrient in mango orchard soil. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2014;14(2):394–406.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Ahmad HM, Wang X, Fiaz S, Azeem F, Shaheen T: Morphological and physiological response of Helianthus annuus L. to drought stress and correlation of wax contents for drought tolerance traits. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 2022:1–15.

  89. Akhtar N, Ilyas N, Hayat R, Yasmin H, Noureldeen A, Ahmad P. Synergistic effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and silicon dioxide nano-particles for amelioration of drought stress in wheat. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2021;166:160–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Safari F, Akramian M, Salehi-Arjmand H, Ghorbanpour M: Nitric oxide-induced physiochemical alterations and gene expression in lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.) under water deficit stress. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 2023, 42(9):5438–5451.

  91. Sorkhi F, Rostami R, Fateh M: The effect of superabsorbent and biological fertilizers under water deficit stress on leaf area index, relative water content and yield of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal 2024, 26(1).

  92. Paryan YA, Mirzakhani M, Sajedi NA. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer and farm yard manure on physiological traits of maize under water deficit condition. Research on Crops. 2012;13(1):75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Sharma P, Jha AB, Dubey RS, Pessarakli M. Reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage, and antioxidative defense mechanism in plants under stressful conditions. J Bot. 2012;2012(1): 217037.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Heydarzadeh S, Arena C, Vitale E, Rahimi A, Mirzapour M, Nasar J, Kisaka O, Sow S, Ranjan S, Gitari H. Impact of different fertilizer sources under supplemental irrigation and rainfed conditions on eco-physiological responses and yield characteristics of dragon’s head (Lallemantia iberica). Plants. 2023;12(8):1693.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Abd El-Mageed TA, Abdelkhalik A, Abd El-Mageed SA, Semida WM. Co-composted poultry litter biochar enhanced soil quality and eggplant productivity under different irrigation regimes. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2021;21(3):1917–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Cia MC, Guimarães A, Medici L, Chabregas S. Azevedo RAd: Antioxidant responses to water deficit by drought-tolerant and-sensitive sugarcane varieties. Annals of Applied Biology. 2012;161(3):313–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Hussain S, Shah MN. Organic amendments mitigate drought stress-induced oxidative changes in synthetic cultivars of maize. Pak J Bot. 2023;55(2):429–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Caliskan O, Radusiene J, Temizel KE, Staunis Z, Cirak C, Kurt D, Odabas MS: The effects of salt and drought stress on phenolic accumulation in greenhouse-grown Hypericum pruinatum. Italian Journal of Agronomy 2017, 12(3).

  99. Tripathi A, Poudel R, Gurung R, Ghimire U, Pandey M, Kandel BP, Joshi BK. Drought tolerance screening of maize accessions at early growth stage in the mid-hills of Nepal. Cogent Food & Agriculture. 2024;10(1):2319157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. El Nahhas N, AlKahtani MD, Abdelaal KA, Al Husnain L, AlGwaiz HI, Hafez YM, Attia KA, El-Esawi MA, Ibrahim MF, Elkelish A: Biochar and jasmonic acid application attenuates antioxidative systems and improves growth, physiology, nutrient uptake and productivity of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) irrigated with saline water. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 2021, 166:807–817.

  101. Paetsch L, Mueller CW, Kögel-Knabner I, Von Lützow M, Girardin C, Rumpel C. Effect of in-situ aged and fresh biochar on soil hydraulic conditions and microbial C use under drought conditions. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):6852.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Meng X, Miao Y, Liu Q, Ma L, Guo K, Liu D, Ran W, Shen Q. Tg SWO from Trichoderma guizhouense NJAU4742 promotes growth in cucumber plants by modifying the root morphology and the cell wall architecture. Microb Cell Fact. 2019;18:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Singh DP, Singh V, Gupta VK, Shukla R, Prabha R, Sarma BK, Patel JS. Microbial inoculation in rice regulates antioxidative reactions and defense related genes to mitigate drought stress. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):4818.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Rawal R, Scheerens JC, Fenstemaker SM, Francis DM, Miller SA, Benitez M-S. Novel Trichoderma isolates alleviate water deficit stress in susceptible tomato genotypes. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13: 869090.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Kamali S, Mehraban A: Effects of Nitroxin and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the agro-physiological traits and grain yield of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) under drought stress conditions. Plos one 2020, 15(12):e0243824.

  106. Agbna GH, Dongli S, Zhipeng L, Elshaikh NA, Guangcheng S, Timm LC. Effects of deficit irrigation and biochar addition on the growth, yield, and quality of tomato. Sci Hortic. 2017;222:90–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Singh R, Singh P, Singh H, Raghubanshi A. Impact of sole and combined application of biochar, organic and chemical fertilizers on wheat crop yield and water productivity in a dry tropical agro-ecosystem. Biochar. 2019;1:229–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Bohara H, Dodla S, Wang JJ, Darapuneni M, Acharya BS, Magdi S, Pavuluri K. Influence of poultry litter and biochar on soil water dynamics and nutrient leaching from a very fine sandy loam soil. Soil and Tillage Research. 2019;189:44–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Fazeli-Nasab B, Shahraki-Mojahed L, Piri R, Sobhanizadeh A: Trichoderma: Improving growth and tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses in plants. In: Trends of Applied Microbiology for Sustainable Economy. Elsevier; 2022: 525–564.

  110. Chaudhary S, Tanvi RD, Goyal S. Different applications of sulphur oxidizing bacteria: A review. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2019;8(11):770–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Kastori R, Plesnicar M, Arsenijevic-Maksimovic I, Petrovic N, Pankovic D, Sakac Z. Photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, and water relations in young sugar beet plants as affected by sulfur supply. J Plant Nutr. 2000;23(8):1037–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Sinha D, Tandon PK: An overview of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium: Key players of nutrition process in plants. Sustainable solutions for elemental deficiency and excess in crop plants 2020:85–117.

  113. Cissé L: Balanced fertilization for sustainable use of plant nutrients. Fertilizer Best Management Practices 2007, 33.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors wish to appreciate Lorestan University and University of Tehran, Iran, for the needful facilities for the research.

Funding

No Funding was provided for doing the current project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.B., M.F., and H.E.; methodology, Z.B., software, Z.B., and H.E., resources, M.F., and H.E.; data curation, Z.B; writing—original draft preparation, Z.B.; and H.B., writing—review and editing, Z.B.; M.F.; H.E.; and L.S.K., supervision, M.F., L.S.K, and H.E., All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hassan Etesami.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. We have obtained permissions to collect plant material and seedlings.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bolhassani, Z., Feizian, M., Sadegh Kasmaei, L. et al. Mitigating water deficit stress in lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.) through integrated soil amendments: A pathway to sustainable agriculture. BMC Plant Biol 24, 900 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05624-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05624-1

Keywords