Fig. 2From: Impact of water deficiency on leaf cuticle lipids and gene expression networks in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Comparison of the leaf stomatal density and stomatal aperture of cotton variety tolerant (XL22) or sensitive (XL17) to drought under the WW andWD conditions. A Leaf stomatal density of the two cotton varieties B Leaf stomatal aperture of the two cotton varieties. C Leaf impressions showing leaf stomatal apertere at two stages under WW and WD conditions on abaxial and adaxial surfaces. a and b. XL22 leaf at the seedling stage under WW and WD condition, respectively. c and d. XL22 leaf at the bud stage under WW and WD condition, respectively. e and f. XL17 leaf at the seedling stage under WW and WD condition, respectively. g and h. XL17 leaf at the bud stage under WW and WD condition, respectively. i, j, k and l, the adaxial surface of XL22 leaf corresponds to a, b, c and d. m, n, o and p, the adaxial surface of XL17 leaf corresponds to e, f, g and h. SS-22, XL22 leaves at seedling stage; SS-17, XL17 leaves at seedling stage; BS-22, XL22 leaves at bud stage; BS-17, XL17 leaves at bud stage. Error bars are standard errors. Values represent the means ± SE, n = 3. The data in Fig. 2A and B were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and mean comparison between treatments was performed based on Duncan's multiple range method at 5% level. For Fig. 2A and B, different letters above the bars indicate statistically different (p < 0.05)Back to article page