Skip to main content

Table 4 Analyses of molecular variance (AMOVAs) for 18 Ficus hirta populations assessed with 9 microsatellite loci

From: High genetic diversity and low population differentiation of a medical plant Ficus hirta Vahl., uncovered by microsatellite loci: implications for conservation and breeding

 

Source of Variation

d.f

SS

Variance components

Percentage of variation (%)

φST

P

Species

Among populations

17

37.880

0.032

3.8

0.038

P < 0.001

Within populations

808

650.072

0.804

96.2

The mid-south cluster (ZJ, WN, LS, SD, HC, HZ, NN, JY, LD, SG, SZ, HY, ZP, LP)

Among populations

13

12.471

0.012

2.9

0.029

P < 0.001

Within populations

620

251.144

0.405

97.1

The eastern cluster (MZ, GZ, SX, ND)

Among populations

3

5.365

0.020

2.4

0.024

P < 0.001

Within populations

188

152.917

0.813

97.6

Two clusters

Among populations

1

8.442

0.026

3.0

0.030

P < 0.001

Within populations

824

679.510

0.825

97.0

The mid cluster (ZJ, SD, HC, HZ, NN, JY, LD, SG, SZ, HY, ZP, LP)

Among populations

11

8.715

0.009

2.0

0.020

P < 0.001

Within populations

526

216.415

0.411

98.0

The south cluster (WN, LS)

Among populations

1

1.687

0.016

1.10

0.011

P < 0.005

Within populations

94

102.104

1.086

98.9

Between Hainan island and mainland China

Among populations

1

7.698

0.041

4.7

0.047

P < 0.001

Within populations

824

680.253

0.826

95.3

Three clusters

Among populations

2

14.233

0.030

3.5

0.035

P < 0.001

Within populations

825

675.393

0.819

96.5